analysis of stackability of cfb boxes.pptx

Upload: prof-cspurushothaman

Post on 14-Apr-2018

245 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    1/29

    Analysis of Stackabilityof CFB Boxes

    ByRushikesh S. Aravkar (108PPT02)Narayan Iyer(108PPT08)

    Shaikh Fehmida Begum(108PPT27)

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    2/29

    Stage - I

    We discussed about :Objectives of project.Theory related to CFB boxes

    ManufacturingTypesQuality control parameters and tests

    McKees Formula. Theoretical Determination of Stackingstrength of CFB boxes.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    3/29

    STAGE - II

    7 BCT trials were done.Difference between theoretical andpractical values was standardized.RCT index was generated.MS-Excel based kraft paper estimator was developed.

    A 3-ply box was designed as analternative for existing 5-ply box.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    4/29

    Stacking Strength of CFB Box

    The compression strength of a CFBbox is a direct measure of its stackingstrength and box performance.

    BCT is the measure of the ability of CFB box to take top-down loadsDetermines how much load can be

    stacked upon the box without the wallsbuckling

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    5/29

    McKees Equation BCT = 0.6 x ECT x Z x t

    Where, BCT = Box Compression in kg,ECT = Edge Compression in kN/m,Z = Box Inside Perimeter in mm,t = Board thickness in mm

    Relation between RCT and ECT:

    ECT=1.28 x [RCT(L1) + TUF(F) x RCT(F) +RCT(L2)]where, ECT = Edgewise Compression in kN/m

    RCT = Ring Crush Test in kN/mRCT in CD is to be considered.TUF = Take-up Factor L1,L2 = Liners;F=Flute

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    6/29

    BCT Trials

    Seven trials were performedTo standardize the difference betweentheoretical and practical results was

    done.

    ReadingNo BCTTheoretical BCTPractical Factor Difference

    1 438.39 371.9 15.17

    2 387.79 272 29.86

    3 344.26 262.6 23.724 344.26 256.4 25.52

    5 332.38 238.4 28.28

    6 385.54 282.2 26.8

    7 402.12 328.6 18.28

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    7/29

    438.39

    387.79

    344.26 344.26 332.38

    385.54402.12

    371.9

    272 262.6 256.4238.4

    282.2

    328.6

    15.1729.86 23.72 25.52 28.28 26.8 18.28

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    B C T ( k g s )

    Reading No.

    BCT : Theoretical v/s Practical

    BCT Theoretical

    BCT Practical

    Factor Difference

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    8/29

    BCT Trials

    It was observed that the factor difference varies from about 15% to30%.

    So we can standardize this differenceto be 30 % at the max.Significant box to box variation in BCT

    valuesPaper properties are variabledepending on the amount and quality

    of recycled content used and the

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    9/29

    CFB box is designed with regards toits performance during stacking.

    The paper is selected on the basis of BF and GSM.Required BCT is approximately

    achieved by altering the GSM BFcombination by trial and error method.But, BF is not directly related to

    stacking strength.RCT ECT BCTStacking

    (paper) (board) (box)

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    10/29

    RCT Index

    Paper suppliers in India do not supplypaper as per the RCT.So an attempt was done to work out

    an index which would give theapproximate RCT value of given GSMand BF paper.Variety of papers of differentspecifications in terms of GSM and BFwere tested for RCT.The samples contained papers from

    different paper mills.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    11/29

    RCT Index

    It can be seen that RCT of paper of given GSM and BF varies significantlyfor different mills.

    It is because of varying source of pulp. Also it is impossible to determine theno. of times the fibres are recycled .Recently some mills like Ruby Maconshave started providing Kraft Paper asper RCT specifications but there is stillinconsistency.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    12/29

    RCT Index

    It gives the range of RCT values for given specification of GSM and BF.

    Paper Grade Range (CD) (kgf)

    140 GSM 18 BF 9 14140 GSM 20 BF 13 17

    150 GSM 20 BF 12 18

    150 GSM 22 BF 13 20

    150 GSM 24 BF 18 24

    180 GSM 20 BF 18 23

    180 GSM 24 BF 24 29

    200 GSM 28 BF 26 - 32

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    13/29

    9

    1312

    13

    18 18

    2426

    14

    17 1820

    24 23

    29

    32

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    140GSM18 BF

    140GSM20 BF

    150GSM20 BF

    150GSM22 BF

    150GSM24 BF

    180GSM20 BF

    180GSM24 BF

    200GSM28 BF

    R C T C D

    ( k g

    f )

    Paper Specifications

    RCT Index

    Minimum RCTMaximum RCT

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    14/29

    Designing 3-ply Box as anAlternative for 5-ply Box

    A 5-ply box is always stronger than a3-ply box of same dimensions andspecifications.But if a stronger paper is used a 3-plybox can provide equal strength as thatof a 5-ply box of same dimensionscost savings and paper savings also.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    15/29

    Steps

    An existing 5-ply box was tested for BCT.New 3-ply box should provide thesame BCT value as that of existing 5-ply.BCT 5-ply = BCT 3-ply => ECT 3-ply => RCT

    Thus using McKees Equation, RCT of paper was determined from requiredBCT.

    Sample Boxes were prepared from the

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    16/29

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    17/29

    The 3-ply boxes made of 180 GSM24BF was tested for BCT and theresults were found to be matchingvery closely with existing 5-ply box.

    BCT trial performed on 3-ply box made of 180GSM24BFReading No. BCT kgs

    1 270 2 250 3 274 4 272 5 268

    Average 266.8

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    18/29

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    19/29

    Static Load Testing of CFBBox

    Compression strength is not equal to stackingstrength.Compression strength (BCT) is a laboratory

    value measured under ideal conditions.

    Although BCT typically overestimates by four to eight times the real stacking strength indistributionIt provides a starting point for estimatingstacking strength.So to determine the load bearing capacity of the box under actual stacking conditions thenewly designed 3-ply CFB box was tested for static load testing.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    20/29

    Net weight of Box Contents: 8.5 kgsWeight of an empty box: 1.12 kgs

    Gross weight of one box: 9.62 kgsNo. of boxes on the top of bottommostbox: 5 (as desired stack is 6 boxes)Total weight required for the test = 9.62x 5 = 48kgsThe test was conducted from 23 rd Aprilto 30 th April 2012. No deflection was

    recorded.The box did not fail for 8 days. Hencewe can conclude that the box haspassed the static load test.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    21/29

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    22/29

    Kraft Paper Estimator

    Predicts the specifications of the KraftPaper, in terms of GSM and BF.This estimator is in the form of anexcel-sheet.It uses McKees formula and RCTindex.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    23/29

    Inputs to be given: No. of plies and flute construction C-Box Specifications TUF Thickness of the board Weight of contents that the CFB box will

    carry Number of boxes on the top of

    bottommost box Factor of Safety (3 to 8, generally 5)

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    24/29

    Given the following inputs the estimator calculates

    Box perimeter Weight of the box (150GSM paper as areference)BCT = (total load on top of bottommostbox) x( factor of safety)Then increasing this by 30 % as a

    standard difference between theoreticaland practical value.This BCT value is used to estimate ECT of the board and RCT of the paper.Depending on the RCT found, the RCTindex is referred to suggest the paper thatis suitable for making the CFB box.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    25/29

    DEMO

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    26/29

    Conclusions

    According to our study we concludethat:

    Theoretical BCT values are at the

    max. 30% higher as compared to thepractical results.

    RCT values vary significantly for paper of different paper mills.

    Generated an RCT index.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    27/29

    Conclusions

    Kraft Paper Estimator was developed.

    5-ply boxes can be replaced with 3-plyconstruction by using stronger paper.

    The 3-ply box designed saves paper by about 40 % and cost is reduced byRs.16/box.

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    28/29

  • 7/27/2019 Analysis of Stackability of CFB Boxes.pptx

    29/29

    THANK YOU