analysis of gas exchange between air capillaries and blood capillaries in avian lungs
TRANSCRIPT
RC.v/CUl/o,r P/IKvio/oq~~ ( I Y78) 32. 27 4Y
@ El.\e\icr North-Holland Biomedical Press
ANALYSIS OF GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR CAPILLARIES AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES IN AVIAN LUNGS
PETER SCHEID
Abstract. A number of models is analyzed to study gas exchange between blood capillaries and air
capillaries in the avian parabronchial wall when diffusion is the only transport mechanism in the air
capillaries. The existing anatomical arrangement of blood capillaries that traverse the periparabronchial
tissue from peripherally located arterioles to draining venules at the luminal surFace appears to provide
a particularly high gas exchange efficiency.
Application of the theory to measurements in the hen using histological estimates suggests that aub-
stantial concentration gradients exist inside the air capillary gas whose magnitude vary along the para-
bronchu>. Thus at the gas inflow end of the parabronchus the partial pressure drop within the air
capillaries could amount. for both 0, and CO,. to ahout 10 IS torr at rest and to 30 40 torr during
exercise. Due to the peculiar arrangement of capillary blood tlow to the air capillaries the effects of these
gradients on gas exchange are very slight during reht. Durmg exercise. however. the diffusional resistance
Inside the air capillaries may become limiting for the over-all gas exchange. and other mechanisms may
be needed to secure respiratory gas transfer.
Avian respiration
Birds
Diffusion
Models for gas exchange
Stratification
Gas exchange in the avian parabronchial lung takes place in the periparabronchial
tissue where blood capillaries meet a meshwork of similarly fine air capillaries.
Whereas gas in the parabronchial lumen is renewed mainly by bulk flow, transfer
of O2 from this site to the gas-blood interface of the air capillaries, and vice uersa
for CO,, is accomplished mainly by diffusion in the periparabronchial airways,
that comprise the atria, the infundibula and the air capillaries. Zeuthen (1942)
and Hazelhoff (1943) have assessed this diffusional resistance to constitute a minor
28 P. SC‘HEID
impairment to the overall parabronchial gas exchange. However, the model under-
lying their calculations does not take due account of the anatomical arrangement
of blood and air capillaries (Duncker, 1971, 1972, 1974a.b; Abdalla and King,
1975). Piiper and Scheid (1973) stated, on the basis of this recent anatomical evi-
dence, that the arrangement of blood flow to the air capillaries showed functional
resemblence with a countercurrent system.
It is the purpose of this paper to develop the functional properties of gas exchange
in the air capillaries taking into account recent morphological data.
Notation
S_ybols
M, gas exchange rate (mmol mini ‘)
P, partial pressure (torr)
dp, relative partial pressure difference ( - )
D, diffusing capacity (mmol min ’ . torr - ’ )
D, diffusion coefficient (cm’. min- ‘)
Q, lung perfusion (ml. min- ‘)
N, number of parabronchi (-)
L, limitation factor (-) [cfl eq. (9)]
X, relative distance in air capillary from atria1 floor (-)
p, capacitance coefficient (mm01 . L- ’ . torr~ ‘)
1, length (cm)
r, radius of parabronchus (cm)
F, total cross-sectional area of air capillaries (cm2)
Subscripts
P, parabronchus
L, parabronchial lumen
A, air capillary
T, end of air capillary
M, blood-gas separating tissue membrane
b, blood
c, capillary
c’, end-capillary
a, arterial
V, mixed venous
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 31
Model II with opposite flow direction to that of Model I resembles the cocurrent
system in respect of partial pressure equilibration, the partial pressure profiles being
distinctly different from those in Model I. In Model III end-capillary blood, of
partial pressure PC’, results as a mixture of capillary blood leaving the contact zone
at various lengths along the air capillary. This model thus resembles the crosscurrent
arrangement used by Scheid and Piiper (I 970) for analysis of exchange between
the bulk of parabronchial gas and the capillary blood.
Blood in the first half of the blood capillary in Model IV equilibrates with air
capillary gas in a way similar to that of Model I except for the higher average gas-
to-blood gradient of Model IV which results from the smaller diffusing capacity,
DM, allotted to this part of the blood capillary. On the course back to the periphery
of the parabronchial wall, the direction of gas exchange may be reversed (as is the
case in the example of fig. 1 A), when O2 taken up by blood from the air capillary
diffuses back into it. This situation occurs when blood capillary partial pressure
surmounts that in air capillary gas. Thus this model creates a shunt between the
effluent and influent blood which results in a decreased gas exchange efficiency of
this model as compared to Models I to III (see below).
In Model V the partial pressure gradient inside the air capillary is constant.
Exchange between gas at the air capillary end and blood is functionally equal to
that in alveoli of mammalian lungs.
IZf~i’citwq* of’ gas cl.\-thanye in thr ourious tmdt~ls
It is convenient to define the relative partial pressure differences both in air capillary
and blood
PL-PPT APA = ~
PL-Ppv
PC’ - PV Apb = -~
PL-Ppv
(2)
(3)
where P-r and PC’ denote the partial pressure at the terminal of the air capillary and
in end-capillary blood. These expressions are readily obtained from the partial
pressure profiles as shown in the Appendix, where explicit expressions are given
for Apb in all models of fig. 1.
APA, the total (relative) partial pressure drop along the air capillary, is marked
by open arrow in fig. 1. Of even higher significance is Apb from which the efficacy
of the gas exchange system may be defined. The amount of gas transferred in any
of the models of fig. 1 is proportional to the end-capillary-to-mixed venous partial
pressure difference, PC’-PV, and thus to Apb. At given values of DM/DA, DM//?bi)
and (PL-PPV), the value of Apb can thus be utilized to compare the gas exchange
efficiency of the different models of fig. 1. In this figure, Apb is indicated by black
arrow besides each partial pressure profile. It is evident that for fig. 1 the sequence
of efficiency of the models is I = II > III > IV > V.
Figure 2 serves to compare the efficiency of the models over a wide range ot
DM/pbQ (abscissa) and for some values of DM;DA (curve parameter). The following
features are apparent.
(i) For very low values of DM,‘DA (c’.cJ. no significant diffusion resistance in air
capillaries) the efficiency is identical in all systems. In fact. for z.ero diffusion resis-
tance (DA ---f -x ) all models become functionally identical with the Ventilated Pool
Model of Piiper and Scheid (1075) used for analysis of alveolar gas exchange in
homogeneous lungs. The curve for DM/DA = 0.01 virtually coincides with that for
DM~DA = 0.
(ii) For any value of DMM/DA and DMi[jbQ the efficiency in Models I and II is
identical [c;f. eqs. (Al4) and (A20) in Appendix]. This result W;IS unexpected to me
since the efficiency of the cocurrent system (with convective flow on both sides of
the membrane) is allegedly poor, whereas the countercurrent system has the highest
efficiency known (Piiper and Scheid. 197.5). However, this fundamental difference
in gas exchange efficiency obtains only for models with convective flow of both
media. To demarcate from these models those in which gas transport is by diffusion
in one medium, the terms countercurrent-lib-c and cocurrent-lilir were adopted.
Despite identical efficiency, the partial pressure profiles in both Models I and II
generally differ considerably (cj: fig. I). In particular. the total partial pressure
drop inside the air capillary (-IPA, open arrow in fig. I) is much higher in Model I
than in II. Thus this partial pressure drop, which has been used by Zeuthen (1941)
0.8
@b
0.6
0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 1
DM /Pbb
Fig. 2. Relative partial pressure in blood. a measure to compare the gas transfer efficacy of the various
models. against the conductance ratio. DM,/%~. Curves calculated for three values of DM;DA. Encircled
numbers refer to the models displayed in fig. I.
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BI.oOD (‘APILLARIES 29
Theory
I. MODELS FOR GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR CAPILLARY AND BLOOD CAPILLARY
General proprties
It is assumed that respiratory gases are transported by d$firsion within the air spaces
of the periparabronchial tissue, consisting of the infundibula and air capillaries;
by d#uion in the tissue barrier separating gas from blood: by cornwtion within
the blood.
The following quantities are required for a quantitative treatment of gas exchange
(typical units in brackets; c:$ Piiper of a/., 1971):
Conduuctanws [mmol . min ’ . torr- ‘1 (c;f: Piiper and Scheid, 1975, 1977):
(I) Diffusive conductance in the gas phase of the air capillary:
DA = D. pg. F/lA (1)
where D represents the diffusion coefficient of the gas under study [cm’.min- ‘1; fig, is the capacitance coefficient of the gas phase, equalling 0.05 10 mmol . L I . torr- 1
for all ideal gases at 41 C (typical body temperature of the duck >nd hen); F and
1~ are cross-sectional area and length. respectively, of the air capillary;
(2) Conductance of diffusive transfer in the liquid phase through the gas-to-blood
tissue membrane, DM ;
(3) Convective conductance of blood, fiba, where [jb [mmol L ’ torr- ‘1 is
the capacitance coefficient in blood of the gas under study (equal to the slope of
the blood dissociation curve), and Q [ml. mini ‘1 is the blood flow to the blood
capillary.
Partial pressures (torr): (1) In the parabronchial lumen (and the atrium) at the
segment from which the air capillary departs, PL; (2) in mixed venous blood, Pv.
The following idealizing assumptions are made and will be discussed later:
(1) The parabronchial lung is functionally homogeneous, meaning that the ratio
DM//3bQ is constant along a given air capillary and that both ratios DM/DA and
Dlcl//IbQ are constant within a given parabronchus as well as in different para-
bronchi.
(2) The cross-sectional area of the air capillaries does not vary in radial direction.
(3) The air capillary may be represented by a straight, non-branching tube
running through the parabronchial wall from the atria1 floor to the interpara-
bronchial septum.
(4) There does not exist a radial partial pressure gradient within the parabronchial
lumen and the adjoining atria.
(5) The system is in steady state, implying constancy in time of PL, PV, and Q.
(6) bb is independent of partial pressure (linear blood dissociation curves).
30
M0Ll~Jl.s NIlU(I’XY/
The special arrangements
the five models that have
I’. S(‘Hl:II)
between blood capillaries and air capillaries underlying
been analyzed are shown in fig. I. In Models I and II
(fig. 1 A and B) the blood capillary contacts the air capillary along its entire course,
blood flow direction being opposite in the two. In Model IV (fig. ID) the blood
capillary follows the air capillary to its origin and then returns, diffusional exchange
taking place in both legs of this hair-pin. In Model III (fig. IC) blood contacts the
capillary only at a short segment along the air capillary length whereas in Model V
(fig. I E) gas has to overcome the entire diffusional resistance offered by air capillary
gas since the blood capillary contacts the air capillary only at the terminal end.
Gas exchange in these models is quantitatively analyzed in the Appendix. In fig. I
the partial pressure profiles in air capillary and blood capillary of each model are
depicted for a selected set of conductance ratios, DM~DA and DM/BbQ. The profiles
for Model I show much resemblance to those of a countercurrent system (Piiper
and Scheid. 1973). particularly the overlap of gas and blood partial pressure ranges.
I have, therefore, adopted the term countercurrent-like arrangement for this system.
A MODEL I B MODEL II
Countercurrent - hke Cocurrent - like IC’ MODEL Ill
Crosscurrent -like
PL
I
I
PT
4-l
PC. P, 1
I3 PC,
P - P, pn
pb d
PL
PL- Pv PT
0 PV 0 X 1
D MODEL IV
Recurrent Loop
PL
E MODEL V
Terminal Contact
PL
PL
PT
on/P& = 5
DM/DA = 5
Fig. I Models analyzed for diffusion limitation in parabronchial air capillaries.
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 33
and Hazelhoff (1943) to assess the limitation to gas exchange imposed by air capillary
diffusion (see below). appears to be not well suited for estimation of the efficiency.
The slope of the curves PA(X) at the beginning of the air capillary, (dPA/dx)x = (),
which is proportional to the gas exchanged, as is the area between PA(X) and Pb(X),
is identical for both. As is evident from the difference between PA(X) and Pb(X)
along the air capillary, gas is exchanged in Model II preferentially in the initial
parts whereas it is more evenly distributed over the air capillary length in Model I
(c:/: tig. I).
(iii) In general. the efficiency of Models I (and II), III, IV and V are different.
This difference is most pronounced in an intermediate range of DM/pbi) Model III
is always less efficient than I and II, and Model V even less than III. Model IV
behaves functionally like Models I and II for small values of DM/fibQ and becomes
identical with Model V for high values of DM//IbQ. Its efficiency can thus be higher
or lower than that of Model III, depending on DM/flbQ.
In the absence of diffusion resistance in t. 4 air capillary (DA + n) all five models
of fig. I behave functionally like the alveolar model. The impairment imposed on
gas exchange by diffusion in the gas phase may thus fictitiously be added to the
membrane resistance, and an apparent membrane diffusing capacity. DM*, in an
analog alveolar model of otherwise identical parameters may be defined which
lacks air capillary diffusion resistance (DA + z) but behaves functionally identically
with the real model (DA finite).
The relative partial pressure difference in blood, dpb. in the idealized, alveolar
model is ((:/I Piiper, 1962; Piiper and Scheid, 1975)
dpb = 1 - exp ( - DM*//Ib@ (4)
and thus
DM* = -/?bG.ln {l-dpb] (5)
Since both the real model for the air capillary and the analog (= alveolar) model
are assumed to have identical gas exchange performance, dpb of both must be
identical and DM* for any model can be calculated by introducing the respective
dpb (Appendix) into eq. (5). DM* thus calculated will in general fall short of the
true DM value and the discrepancy between both reflects the diffusion resistance
inside the air capillaries.
II. GAS EXCHANGE IN THE COMPOSITE PARABRONCHUS
So far gas exchange was considered in the model of an isolated air capillary with
its blood supply. The parabronchus consists of a number of these elements, arranged
in series with respect to parabronchial gas flow. This results in parabronchial gas
34 P. SCHEID
partial pressures, PL, that vary along the parabronchial axis and are not constant
as was assumed for the model analysis of fig. 1.
With varying PL along the parabronchus, PC’ varies, too. But for the homogeneous
parabronchus, with constant DM/pbQ throughout (cf: Assumptions), Apb does not
vary. Therefore, the apparent diffusing capacity, DM*, which is apt to describe the
effects of diffusion impairment inside the isolated unit of air capillary, may be used
to assess this effect on gas exchange in the parabronchus as a whole.
Lkvitiny efjkct qf air capillary d@sion
To evaluate the impairment imposed on gas exchange by diffusion in the air capil-
laries, the rate of parabronchial gas exchange, &I. may be compared with that, h;I T,,
in a parabronchus of identical parameters except for infinite DA (no diffusion
resistance in air capillaries).
To calculate h;r, the apparent diffusing capacity, DM*, may be used. In the cross-
current system applicable to parabronchial gas exchange (Scheid and Piiper, 1970;
Piiper and Scheid, 1975)
PbQ - -( 1 - exp ( - DM*/fibQ)) 1
PgV J (6)
where PI constitutes inspired partial pressure and ‘? parabronchial ventilation..
Using eq. (4), this can be re-written as
ti = (PI-PV)./?gV. I-exp { [- $Apb]j
In the absence of diffusion resistance in air capillaries, DM* = DM, and thus (for
unchanged PV)
- $(l -exp(-DM/fibQ)) II Combination of eqs. (7) and (8) allows to calculate a limitation factor
LA = IQ-&I 7-=_l-
l-exp{- s.Apb)
M, g( I- exp ( -
(9)
DM/@bQ))
which may be used for a quantitative evaluation of the impairment on parabronchial
gas transfer imposed by diffusion resistance in the air capillaries.
Figure 3 is a plot of LA against DM//?bQ for some selected values of DM/DA and
for figi’/fibQ = 1. The sequence of LA for the different models is very similar to the
sequence of the corresponding values of Apb (d: fig. 2): the model with lower LA
at a given set of parameters has a higher value Apb as would be expected from eq.
(9). In general, LA increases with increasing DM/DA (increasing diffusion resistance
in air capillaries) and, for a given DM/DA, decreases with increasing DM/flbQ.
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD (‘APILLARIES 35
LA
80
(%I
60
0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20
44lPtl~
50 loo
Fig. 3. Limitation imposed on gas transfer by diffusion resistance m air capillaries against the conduc-
tance ratio DM:/ibQ. Curves plotted for three values of DM:DA. Symbols as m fig. 7.
In the definition of LA [eq. (9)] the effect on gas exchange rate by air capillary diffusion is investigated while PV is kept constant. It may, however, be more relevant to keep the total gas exchange rate constant (which at steady state equals the metabolic rate) and express the effects ofdiffusion limitation in the air capillary as changes in PS. Thus removal of this diffusion resistance would result in a mixed venous partial pressure, PV, From eqs. (6) to (9) an expression for this partial pressure can be found
(Pv, -Pv) = (PI-Pii). LA (10)
Application to experimental data
Dif;fsing capacity DA
The theory will now be applied to experimental data, both morphological and physiological, to assess the limiting role in gas exchange played by diffusion in the gas phase of the air capillaries. Table 1 contains ranges of morphometrical estimates obtained for a variety of birds by H.-R. Duncker (persona1 communication). These values are utilized to calculate air capillary diffusing capacity, DA, from eq. (1). The total cross-sectional area, F, was assumed to equal one half of the area of the luminal wall of parabronchi (cf: Zeuthen, 1942; Hazelhoff, 1913). Thus
F = 0.5.2rcr.lp.N
where r constitutes the radius of the parabronchial lumen; lp, the length of an
36 P. SCHEID
TABLE I
Range ofmorphometrical data assessed from a variety of birds* to estimate air capillary diffusmg capacity _~ .- ~~~~ ~~~~-
Minimal Maximal
estimate estimate
Number of parabronchi in both lungs N 700 300
Length of parabronchus (cm) IP 2.5 3.0
Radius of parabronchial lumen (cm) r 0.0’ 0. I Length of air capillary (cm) IA 0.02 0.05
Diffusion coeflictents
(cm’ .min ‘)
n 0) 13.20**
n < 0: Y.hO**
Diffusing capactty of air capillary (DA),,, 0.42 9.52
(mmol.min I ‘torr~ r) (DA),,,. 0.31 6.92
* Personal communication by H.-R. Duncker.
** Binary diffusion coefficients in NL. at 41 C. calculated usmg eq. ( I I I I ) of Reid and Sherwood (1966).
individual parabronchus; and N, the number of parabronchi in the paleopulmo of
both lungs.
Membrane dt#Using capacity, DM, and pwfi.uiw conductance, DbQ
The values for flbQ and (DM*),> during rest listed in table 2 are taken from Scheid
and Piiper (1970; <f:f: Piiper and Scheid. 1975) and were obtained for the unanesthetized
chicken breathing spontaneously a hypoxicchypercapnic mixture. Since (DM*),~
was calculated assuming a model in which air capillary diffusing capacity, DA, was
TABLE 2
Effects of diffusion in air captllaries on parabronchial gas exchange during rest and exercise
(mmol.min~ r)
;o ( mmol min ’ torr r ) DM* (mmol mini ’ torr ’ ) DM (mmol~min~‘.torr~ r)
DA (mmol.min~‘.torr r)
/?g\i (mmol~min~‘.torr~‘)
LA (“,,) Pt - PV (torr)
Pa - PV (torr)
PV, - PV (torr)
PV, -PV
Pa-P?
Rest Exercise
20 IX
0.34 I.3
02 CO? 02 c-01
I 0 - 0.x
0.034 0.13 0.063 _
0.067 1.13
0.42 0.31
0.039
I.3 0.6
55 -26
32 - 8
0.7 - 0.2
_ _ 0.67 Il.3
0.42 0.31
0.78
13.5 12.x
90 -30
60 -15
I’ - 3.8
0.02 0.02 0.20 0.25
For details see text.
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 37
infinite, this value may underestimate the true membrane diffusing capacity, DM, and constitutes the apparent value of eq. (5). The true value for (DM)~, was obtained from (DM*)~~ by calculating dpb from eq. (4) and DM from eqs. (A12) and (AlA). As can be seen from table 2, DM deviates from DM* by only 6”;).
To calculate (DM)~~~, a ratio (DM)~~~/(DM)~~ = 16.8 was assumed which equals the ratio of Krogh’s diffusion constants for both gases in water at 37 C (Kawashiro
et ul., 1975).
For exercise a 20-fold increase in O2 uptake, tioJ, was assumed. Ventilation was
taken to increase in proportion with h;loz and both Q and DM to increase by a factor of 10. Although no experimental values are available for this increasein the con- ductances, it appears to be necessary for them to be elevated in order that the lung
can cope with the increased demand.
The partial pressure differences, (PI - PV) and (Pa - PV), during rest are those
obtained by Scheid and Piiper (1970) whereas the values during exercise were assumed.
Partial prrssure projk The partial pressure profiles for O2 and CO, in air and blood capillaries have been
calculated for Model I using the data of table 2 and eqs. (Al 0) and (Al 1) of the
Appendix (fig. 4).
Under the most favorable conditions. when DA = (DA)_ (dashed lines in fig. 4).
the partial pressure profiles resemble those expected for absent diffusion resistance.
A. REST IO ---------__T_----
8. EXERCISE ----------
B
Fig. 4. Partial pressure profiles in blood and air capillaries for Model I, plotted against the length of
the exchange area. Continuous lines, DA = (DA),,“; dashed lines. DA = (DA),,,~~. A. rest; B, exercise.
Upper half, 0, : lower half, CO,. Arrows indicate range of partial pressures in gas (open arrow) and blood
(closed arrow). The stippled arrow reflects the difference in the range of blood partial pressure between
(DA)mn and (DA),,,~~.
38 P. SC‘HEID
Only for CO, during exercise is there a signi~cant drop in air capillary partial pressure under this condition.
If, on the other hand, DA is at its minimal value, there does exist a marked partial pressure drop inside the air capillary gas for both CO, and 0, during rest and exercise as indicated by the open arrows in fig. 4. During either rest or exercise, the drop for CO? is more pronounced than that for 0,; conversely, the drop is enlarged during exercise.
This gradient inside the air capillary is not necessarily related to the i~npairment of gas exchange due to diffusion resistance in the air capillary (see above). A better yet qualitative indication for this impairment can be obtained from the relative partial pressure difference in blood, dpb, which is indicated for the case of DA = (DA)“,~~ by the black arrow in fig. 4 in the convention adopted from fig. 1, and by the stippled arrow for DA = (DA)_. As DA is increased from (DA),,,~,, to
(DGmax 3 dpb increases as the difference between the two arrows. Since (DA),,,~~ is functionally close to infinity, this increase is an estimate of the increased efficiency of gas exchange when the high diffusion resistance in the air capillaries is removed. Thus a particularly prominent increase in efficiency may be obtained during exercise, and, conversely, a prominent impairment to gas exchange by air capillary diffusion is expected under these conditions.
&jkct qf’uir capillary- d&$4sion resistutm ott hlooci gu.ws
This impairment can more quantitatively be expressed by the limitation factor, LA. LA can be calculated for Model I using the values for Bbif, DM, DA and {$g%’ listed in table 2 together with eqs. (Al4) and (9). For both rest and exercise the minimal values of DA from table 1 were used to assess maximum effects of air capil- lary diffusion.
During rest, LA is about 1 “o for both 0, and C02, meaning that gas exchange rates could be increased by about 1 “<, if DA were increased to infinity. During exercise,
LA is increased for both gases to about l3”,,. The effects of air capillary diffusion on blood gases was estimated from LA using
eq. (10). For both 0, and COz only small effects of air capillary diffusion on PV are calculated at rest which increase, however, substantially during exercise. During both rest and exercise the absolute change in PV is about 3 times larger for 0, than for COz. However, when this value is related to the total arterial-to-mixed venous partial pressure difference, very similar values result for both gases.
Calculation of LA has similarly been performed using recent experimental values offibQ, pgv, and DM* in the resting duck (R. E. Burger, M. Meyer, P. Scheid, un- published). The resulting limitation factors for 0, and CO2 are about twice the values assessed for the hen (table 2) and are thus very similar.
GAS EX<‘HANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 39
Discussion
I. MODEL ANALYSIS
For the analysis it was assumed that diffusion is the only mechanism for gas transport
in the air capillaries. In fact, even in those avian species in which there exist
anastomoses between air capillaries of neighboring parabronchi (Duncker, 1971;
King, 1966) convective movement through them would require a pressure difference
between adjacent parabronchi (Hazelhoff, 1943) for which there is no basis.
Quantitative analysis in all models is based on a number of simplifying assump-
tions which in part were made because of lack of precise knowledge and in part to
avoid confusing mathematical complications. Of particular interest are the following
assumptions.
(1) The total cross-sectional area of the air capillaries was assumed to be constant
in radial direction (assumption 2) although an increase might be expected in the
direction towards the periphery of the periparabronchial tissue. Thus the cross-
sectional area of the air capillaries at their origin from the parabronchial lumen
constitutes a lower limit; and so does DA that is calculated on this basis. This entrance
region to the air capillaries is conceivably the most significant part since all gas has
to pass this cross-section.
(2) Branching of the air capillaries has been neglected (assumption 3). Such
branching would have no effect on diffusion unless the total cross-sectional area
of air capillaries changed in the direction from the parabronchial lumen towards
its periphery (see above); and unless the curvature of the air capillary path con-
stituted a significant increase in the air capillary length. For this latter reason the
thickness of the periparabronchial tissue may be a minimum estimate for IA, and
DA calculated therefrom may thus overestimate the true diffusing capacity of the
air capillaries.
(3) It was assumed that no concentration gradients exist in radial direction
either in the air capillaries or in the parabronchial lumen, including the atria (as-
sumption 4). For the air capillary this seems to be justified because of its small diam-
eter. This diameter is, on the other hand, large as compared with the free path of
the gas molecules at atmospheric pressure so that influences by the proximity of
solid walls on gas diffusion are not expected (Weis-Fogh, 1964). But also for the
parabronchial lumen the assumption of absent radial concentration gradients may
be met since convective movement of parabronchial ventilation aids diffusion in
homogenizing gas concentrations. More serious may be the assumption that the
gas concentration within the parabronchial lumen equals that of the radially adjoin-
ing atria. However, since the dimensions of the atria are of the same order or below
the radius of the parabronchial lumen, secondary motions induced by ventilatory
flow are expected to provide enough convection inside the atria to counteract partial
pressure gradients in them (R. C. Schroter, personal communication).
40 P. SC‘HEID
(4) The dimensions of the parabronchus and its air capillaries were assumed to
be fixed. However, smooth muscle that occurs abundantly in the parabronchial wall
could adjust the parabronchial lumen. Thus during flight, when the demands on
gas exchange are maximal. the smooth muscle could relax to increase the diameter
of the parabronchial lumen which would not only reduce the air flow resistance
through the parabronchi (Molony rt ul., 1976) but would effectively reduce the
length of the air capillaries, and thus increase DA. Furthermore, rhythmic contrac-
tions of these muscles could result in convective movement of gas in the air capillaries
and thus effectively reduce the gas exchange resistance as was proposed by Akester
(1971).
Atu~ton~ical urrat~getmwt of’uir and blood cupilluries md the ai~~quatrJuttc,tiorlul tnodel
Gas exchange between air capillaries and blood capillaries depends on the relative
anatomical arrangement of the two capillary systems and it is this arrangement
which finally decides which of the models of fig. 1 is the most appropriate for this
problem. The arrangement of blood capillaries and air capillaries has recently been
studied experimentally in much detail (Duncker, 1971~ 1974a; Abdalla and King,
1975). These authors agree that the air capillaries anastomose profusely to form a
meshwork (<t:f: King, 1966). Different views, however, are held among investigators
on the structural arrangement of blood capillaries in the parabronchial wall. Duncker
(1971, figs. 37 and 38; 1972) assumes blood capillaries to emerge from arterioles at
the interparabronchial septum and to drain into venules close to the atria1 floor.
On their course these blood capillaries anastomose freely to form a meshwork
resembling that of air capillaries. Later, Duncker (1974a, fig. 2; 1974b, fig. 6) reported
that the blood capillaries run more or less straight, without anastomosing, connecting
arterioles in the periphery and venules at the parabronchial lumen. Abdalla and
King (1975, fig. 24) agree with Duncker (1971) on rich anastomoses between blood
capillaries. In their model, however, most intraparabronchiai arterioles and venules
penetrate to some extent into the parabronchial wall. Capillary blood flow in this
model may thus be oblique to the radial direction.
It is important to realize which of the anatomical parameters described are likely
to affect the gas exchange function of the system investigated in this paper and thus
impact on the choice of the model. In Model I the blood capillary has gas exchange
contact with the air capillary along its entire length. This would strictly apply to the
situation of straight, non-anastomosing blood capillaries, meeting straight, non-
anastomosing air capillaries, both arranged radially. At least the latter form a
meshwork; however, it is conceivable that at a given distance from the entrance
into the air capillary, the partial pressure between adjacent segments of the air
capillaries does not differ markedly. Thus for functional considerations the boundary
between adjacent air capillaries is of little significance and so is the meshwork
arrangement. Similariy. the arrangements of Duncker (1971) of a network of blood
capillaries and his later view (Duncker, 1974a, b) of straight, non-anastomosing
blood capillaries does not imply functional differences, since in both cases blood
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 41
contacts air capillaries over their entire course. This and the blood flow direction
from peripheral to central would make Model I the primary choice for use with
Duncker’s morphological picture.
The arrangement proposed by Abdalla and King (1975) is slightly different. Here
blood emerges at various depths in the parabronchial wall and is also drained within
this mantle. Thus a blood capillary has gas exchange contact with only a fraction of
the air capillary length. If, in fact, both the arterioles and venules penetrated the
entire parabronchial wall giving off air capillaries like the steps of a ladder, Model 111
(fig. 1C) would be most appropriate. It is evident that the arrangement proposed
by Abdalla and King (1975) is intermediate between Models I and III. However,
for most values of DM/DA and DM/fibQ that might occur in avian lungs (cj: table 2)
the functional differences between these models are not very prominent (c:f: figs. 2
and 3).
A different view on the arrangement of blood and air capillaries was expressed
by Akester (1971 ; c/l his fig. 26). According to this author arterioles and venules ac-
company each other and two such systems occur, one inside the interparabronchial
septa, the other close to the atria1 floor. Blood capillaries, emerging from arterioles
and draining into venules at both sites, form a meshwork to contact the network
of air capillaries. It is conceivable that blood of a given arteriole drains into the
concomitant venule. Thus blood in the contact zone would be expected to flow in
loops, one loop from the atria1 floor, the other from the interparabronchial septum,
and both digging about half way into the parabronchial wall. It is evident that
Model IV (fig. 1) is but a poor analog of this arrangement; however, it may be
used to assess the effect of this recurrent loop arrangement on gas exchange. In
fact, this arrangement appears to be inferior to any other in which blood is provided
on one side and drained on the other of the parabronchial wall.
Zeuthen (1942) and Hazelhoff (1943) have used the Terminal Contact Model V
to evaluate the effects of air capillary diffusion on gas exchange. Their model has
not been based on microscopic observations. Their analysis will be discussed below.
Sign[/icance of anatomical arrangement
The theoretical analysis suggests that any arrangement in which blood capillaries
traverse the entire parabronchial mantle to contact air capillaries along their whole
course (Models I and II) would be most beneficial to overcome possible impairment
by air capillary diffusion. It appears to be essential to feed the capillaries on one
side and drain them at the opposite side; it is, however, not essential for gas exchange
whether arterioles run in the periphery and venules close to the lumen, or vice versa
(equal efficiency for Models I and II). Opposite blood flow with arterioles at the
parabronchial lumen would require small arteries to traverse the gas exchange tissue
whose thicker walls would occupy more space than the thin-walled venules. It may.
therefore, be concluded that the arrangement met in the parabronchial wall appears
to be most efficient for gas exchange in the presence of a diffusional resistance in the
air capillaries.
42 P. SC‘HEID
Applicahilit?! to alwolar gas r.\-change duriny strut~fkution
It is tempting to utilize the Terminal Contact Model V for analysis of alveolar gas
exchange in the presence of stratified inhomogeneities, that is, when diffusion
equilibration within the terminal lung units is incomplete. In fact, a similar model
has recently been used by Adaro and Piiper (1976) and by Sikand rt al. (1976) to
assess effects of stratification on alveolar 0, uptake in dog and man. Model V
predicts significant limitations by gas diffusion only if the air capillary diffusing
capacity, DA, is of the same order of magnitude as or below that of the tissue mem-
brane, DM (c$ lig. 2). Since Krogh’s diffusion constant for 0, in the gas phase is
about 10” to lo6 times higher than in tissue, DA would be expected to surpass DM
unless the gas has to travel in the gas phase over distances comprising alveolar
ducts and sacs. Since blood contacts alveoli all along this path, the apprapriate
model to treat stratification in an otherwise homogeneous alveolar lung would be
the crosscurrent-like Model III rather than the Terminal Contact Model V.
West rt a/. (1969) in their fig. 12 have suggested that countercurrent flow past
the alveolar ducts, from the terminal end of the bronchial tree towards the conduct-
ing airways, minimizes the impairment of gas exchange in the presence of strati-
fication. This proposed flow pattern would correspond to our countercurrent-like
arrangement of Model I, and, in fact, its efficiency exceeds that of Model III (cf:
fig. 2) which would be appropriate for the homogeneous alveolar lung. However,
it should be noted that a cocurrent-like arrangement would have the same effect
on gas exchange in the presence of stratification as the countercurrent-like flow
pattern. Furthermore, as was expressed above, analysis of stratified inhomogeneities
in terms of concentration gradients does not necessarily permit conclusions about
their impact on gas exchange.
West rt al. (1969) have also proposed that a pattern of blood flow in the terminal
lung units that corresponds to the crosscurrent-like Model III, but with more flow
past proximal alveolar units, would oppose stratification. I have calculated the
effect of blood flow distribution in Model III with the conductance values under-
lying fig. 1. When blood flow decreased linearily from twice average at the beginning
to zero at the end of the air capillary, DM being evenly distributed along the air
capillary, the efficiency increased as compared with the homogeneous Model III,
dpb increasing from 0.76 (fig. IC) to 0.81. The total relative drop in air capillary
partial pressure, APA, decreased from 0.34 (fig. 1C) to 0.26 in this example. I have
not systematically investigated the effect of blood flow distribution in Model III
on gas exchange. It is, however, worth noting from this example that an unequal
distribution of blood flow to membrane diffusing capacity may offer an advantage
over the homogeneous case, whereas in most other systems inhomogeneity is detri-
mental (Piiper, 1969; Scheid et al., 1973).
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD C‘APILLARIES 43
II. LIMITING ROLE OF AIRWAY DIFFUSION IN AVIAN LUNGS
The morphological data used to calculate the possible range of DA are very rough
estimates. Moreover, the parameters that are most unfavorable for airway diffusion
have been combined in the estimate of (DA),,,~“, and riw w-m, and thus the range
of possible DA values may have been overestimated. The physiological parameters,
particularly those assessed for exercise conditions, have been estimated with some
extrapolation from equivalent data in mammals. In particular, the increase in DM
on exercise. which is observed in man and can be attributed in part to effects of
functional inhomogeneities (Piiper, 1969) had to be adopted for calculation of
values of table 2 in order that the expected mixed venous Par values be reasonable.
As a result, this study gives only a range for the possible effects of airway diffusion
on parabronchial gas exchange.
Effects on air capillary diffusion might be expected from the reduced gas density
during high altitude flight. Since the binary diffusion coefficients are inversely
proportional to the total gas pressure, PB, DA for any gas will increase approximately
inversely with PB. Thus when all other conductances are unchanged, LA is expected
to decrease and the total gas exchange conductance to increase. This increase will
in general be not sufficient to compensate the fall in inspiratory Paz which is about
proportional to PB.
Zeuthen (1942) was the first to assess limitations on CO? exchange offered by
the air capillaries. His analysis differs from that of this study in respect of two
main points. Firstly, the model used by him is the Terminal Contact Model V
(fig. I E) and thus his results are expected to overestimate the impairment. Secondly.
he has assumed equal distribution of CO, exchange over the parabronchial length.
Pco, profiles along the parabronchus (c$ Meyer et al., 1976) show that under normal
resting conditions most CO, exchange occurs in the initial portions of the para-
bronchus. Thus less than average air capillaries have to cope with CO, exchange
and the limitation is expected to be higher than assessed by Zeuthen (1942).
Zeuthen (1942) has predicted for the hen at rest a partial pressure drop from
parabronchial air to that in the air capillaries of 0.5 torr, and has interpreted this
finding as a negligible effect of diffusion in air capillaries. From the histological
values used by him, a value of DA = 2.12 mmol . min- ’ . torr~ ’ for both lungs can
be calculated which is only one third of our maximum estimate and is thus close to
the high end of the DA range assessed here. In fact, our estimates of table 1 would
predict, on the basis of his model, a Pco2 drop of 3.25 torr for (DA)~~” and 0.15 torr
for (DA),,,~~. For a flying bird with a 25-fold increase in gas exchange, Zeuthen
(1942) has predicted a partial pressure drop for CO, of about 12 torr, whereas our
values of DA in his model would give 3.8 to 81 torr, the latter figure exceeding by
more than a factor of 2 the expected total difference between PI and PV.
I, therefore, tend to agree, from the results of his study, with Zeuthen (1942)
that “ventilation of the air capillaries will possibly be beneficial in the flying bird,
although it is hardly a necessity” although I would like to criticize the deduction
44 I’. S(‘HEID
of this conclusion for three reasons. First, his model is not appropriate. Second,
the value of DA chosen by him may well be an underestimation of the reality. In
fact, values close to (DA),~,, of table I would have led him to a different conclusion.
Third, for theoretical reasons (see above). the partial pressure drop in the air
capillaries is a very poor estimate of the impairment of gas exchange derived from
airway diffusion.
Hazelhoff (1943) has used a similar model as Zeuthen ( 1942). His estimate of DA
for O2 is about 2.5 times that used by Zeuthen for CO,. Correspondingly, his con-
clusion is that diffusion in the air capillaries is sufficient “even during very swift
flight”. The discussion to the data of Zeuthen (1942) applies to his values and
arguments as well.
Appendix
I. C’ountrrcunent-lilac arrunyrnwnt (Model I; fiy. I A)
The amount of gas crossing the membrane element, DM . dx, of the air capillary at
the distance x from the parabronchial lumen leads to a change in the diffusional
partial pressure gradient of the air capillary, dPA/dx. and at the same time to an
increase in blood partial pressure. dPb/dx, of the gas under study. Thus
-D.pg. F. {(ddjx- (ddp;\)x+dj = DM.;; [PA(x)--b(x)) (Al)
pb@Pb(x)-Pb(x+dx)) = D,.d,” IPA(x)-P~(~)~ (A2)
Using eq. (1) and introducing
a = DM/DA ; b = DM/,8bo (A3)
and the relative distance in the air capillary from its origin at the atrial floor,
X = X/IA (A4)
these equations can be re-written
d2PA ~ = a(PA-Phi dX2
dPb
dX - -b{PA-Pb;
(A%
(A61
The following boundary conditions apply
x = 0: PA = PL
x= 1: dPA/dX = 0
(A7)
(W
Equations (A5) gas and blood
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 45
Pb = PV (A91
and (A6) can be integrated to yield the partial pressure profiles in
PA(X)-Pq k, exp (k,(l -X)) -k, exp ik,(l -X)j ___-_ ~ PL-Ppv k, exp(k+kz exp(k,)
Pb(X) - PV _~ ~ = b exp :k,(l -X)1-exp lk,tl -Xt’,
PL-Ppii ‘ ______ ~- .__~_.
k, exptk,)-k,exp(k,)
with
(AI2)
The relative partial pressure drop in air capillary, APA, and blood capillary, dpb, can be obtained from eqs. (AlO) and (Al 1)
PL-PT k~~exp(k~)-I~-k*~exp(k,)-1~ dpA =z pL_-pi; =: _~__~--- _ ._.__.__ k,exp(k,)-k,exp(k,)
(A131
exp(k,)-exp(k,) dpb =; ‘&I:.= b--p _ _-__ __ k, exp(k,)-kzexp(k,)
(A141
2. Cocurrent-like arrungrnwnt (Model II: fig. I B)
This arrangement resembles that of the countercurrent-like arrangement (tig. 5A), the difference being the reversed blood flow past the air capillary. Equations (A5) and (A6) apply to this system if b is replaced by -b. The boundary conditions in this model are
x = 0: PA = PL (A151
Pb = PC (A16)
x= 1: dPA/dX = 0 (A171
Integration of eqs. (A5) and (A6), with b -+ - b, and with eqs. (A 15) to (Al 7) yields
the partial pressure profiles both in air capillary gas, PA(X), and in blood, Pb(X):
PA(X)-PY exp(k,){b+k, exp(k,X)) -exp(k,)fb+k,exp(k,X)f = _______- ______ k, exp(kJ-k?exp(k,)
(A181 PL-Pf
Pqx) - PV b expel-exp(k~X)~ -expel-exp(k,X)~
PL-Ppv = * ___~__..~.._ -. .___
k, vfk,)-k, ev(k,) (A191
with k, and k, according to eq. (Al2). End-capiIlary partial pressure, PC’, can be calculated from eq. (A19) at X = 1:
PC’ - Pii exptk,)-exp(k,) Apb-:p=: .p PL-PQ b k, exp(k,)_k,exp(k,)
6420)
46 I’. X‘HtIl~
3. (‘r’o,r.Sc’lrl’l’c,tlt-lib-(’ LItWtl~J~‘IIlCtl t (Model I I1 ; fig. I C)
It is assumed that each element of air capillary length receives an equal fraction of
blood and that blood from all these elements is mixed to yield the equivalent of
end-capillary blood partial pressure, PC’.
Gas exchange between any element along the air capillary length with the respec-
tive blood flow may be treated as gas exchange in a mammalian alveolus (Piiper,
1962). The partial pressures in the blood leaving this element at the distance X,
Pb( X). and in air capillary gas. PA(X), are thus given by
Pb(X)- PV
PA(x)- PC = I -exp(- DMjpbi))
Furthermore, the amount of gas taken up by
partial pressure gradient in gas which can be
to eq. (A5)
d’PA a dX’ =b (Pb(X)- Pv]
(A?l)
this element leads to a change in the
expressed by an equation equivalent
(AZ)
This equation is to be integrated with the following boundary condition
x = 0: PA = PI. (~23)
x = I: dPA,,dX = 0 (~24)
The following solutions give the partial pressure profiles in gas and in end-capillary
blood along the air capillary
PA(x)- Pij exp ic(l -X)j +exp (-c(1 -X)]
pL_p; = exp (c) + exp ( -c) (A25)
Pb(X)- PV b.c’ exp Ic(l-X):+exp (-ccl-X))
PI. - PV a exp (c) + exp ( -cl
where
c= + J a (I-exp(-b)) b
(A26)
(A27)
The partial pressure in mixed blood leaving the air capillary, PC’, may be obtained
by integrating eq. (A26) over the air capillary length
PC’ - PV dpb = ~~
b.c exp(c)-exp(-c) pL_ppv = -y’ exp (c) + exp ( -c)
(A28)
4. Rrctirrcwt 100~ ~rrcm+‘n~mt (Model IV; fig. I D)
Blood has contact with the air capillary both in the course from the periphery to
the origin of the air capillary and back to the periphery. Membrane diffusing capa-
city, DM, is assumed to be evenly allotted to the air capillary length and, at a given
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLOOD CAPILLARIES 47
length, to both portions of the blood capillary. The differential equations are thus
d2PA a
dX2 - = 2 ((PA-Pb)+(PA-Pb))
dPb b -=_ dX 2
(PA- Pb;
dPb = b ‘PA--b) dX 2’
(A291
(A301
(A31)
a and b are given by eq. (A3). Pb refers to partial pressure of blood in the first half, Pb in the second half of the blood capillary.
The following boundary conditions apply
x = 0: Pb = Pb (A321
PA = PL (A331
x= 1: Pb = PV (A34)
dPA/dX = 0 (A351
The general solutions of eqs. (A29) to (A35) are
Pb(X) - PV ~~_ = l+A+B.X+C.emkX+DekX PL-Ppv
Pb(X)- PV
PL-Ppv ={l+A-tBj+BX-C{g+F+I)e-*‘-D{z-
(A37j
where
k = +m+a and
(A391
A = [%rG +k)e*+ F(22 -k)epk+2k]/E NW
B = k2(&-epk)/E (A41 1
(A421 C= -(i+:--k)(ek+z)/E
D=(i+F+k)(e-“+z)/E (A431
48 P. X‘HEID
e-k- {(k’+b)+ (; +k)($ + 3ek-4k (A44)
The partial pressure in end-capillary blood, PC’. can be derived from eq. (A38)
at x = 1.
Apb = “‘-” ~ = l+[{[;+k)($+~) PL-Ppv
+(b-k’i}e-*- j@ -k)(4b: + g) +(b-kz)jek+4k]/L (A45)
5. Tcmlinal contact arrangenwnt (Model V; fig. IE)
It is assumed in this model, as in the other models. that no radial diffusion gradient
exists inside the air capillary. Gas exchange between capillary blood and gas at
the terminal end of the capillary, of partial pressure PT, can thus be calculated by
the alveolar mode1 (Piiper, 1962):
(PC’- PV) = (PT- PV)( 1 -exp (- DM//jbo)I
Furthermore mass conservation leads to
fib@ Pc’ - PV) = DA( PL - PT)
Combination of both equations yields
(A46)
(A47)
PL-PPT APA =
1 -exp(-b)
PL-Ppv = a b+a~l~-;xp ( _ b);
PC’ - PV Apb = b
1 -exp(-b)
PL-Ppv = b+ajl-exp(-b))
(A481
(A49)
The partial pressure profile in the gas phase in this mode1 is obviously linear.
Acknowledgement
I wish to express thanks to Dr. Johannes Piiper who has contributed invaluable
suggestions at all steps during the preparation of the manuscript.
Abdalla, M. A. and A. S. King (1975). The functional anatomy of the pulmonary circulation of the
domestic fowl. Respir. Physiol. 23: 267-290.
GAS EXCHANGE BETWEEN AIR AND BLDDU CAPILLARIES 49
Adaro. F. and J. Ptiper (1976) Limiting role of stratification in alveolar exchange of oxygen. Rc.\/‘ir.
P/?r.rio/. 26 : I92 206. Akcster. A. R. (lY71). The blood vascular system. In: Phystology and Biochemistry of the Domestic
Fowl, Vol 2. edtted by D. J. Bell and B. M. Freeman. London, New York. Academic Press. pp
7x3 x39.
Duncker, H.-R. (1971 ). The lung an sac system of birds. Ery&n. .lt~trt. G~ru,rc,X/.-G’c,.~~,/~. 45. Heft 6.
Duncker, H.-R. (1972). Structure of avian lungs. Rc.\pir. Ph,~~sio/. 14: 44 63.
Duncker, H.-R. ( lY74a). Die Anordung des Gefafjsystems in der Vogellunge. l’crlr. .drtcrr. G‘c,.\. 6X. 5 I7 523.
Duncker, H.-R. (lY74b). Structure of the avian respiratory tract. Rc.vpir. Ph,v.siol. 23: I 19.
Hazelhoff, E. H. ( 1943). Bouw en functie van de vogellong. R. IV& .4ktrc/. U’c,/. I ‘hl. Gcwor~c~ I ‘b~qd .4/d. N’rrr~rurkd. 52: 3Y I 400. English translation (I951 ): Structure and functton of the lung of birds.
Poulrrj~ .s<,i. 30: 3 IO.
Kavvashiro. T.. W. Ntissc and P. Scheid (tY75). Determination of diffusivity of oxygen and carbon dioxtde
in respiring tissue: results in rat skeletal muscle. P/lii</zr.\ Arc,/!. 359: 231 251.
King. A. S. (1966). Structural and functional aspects of the avian lungs and air sacs. I/tr. RN. GOI. E.\-/,.
%ool. 7: I71 267.
Meyer. M.. H. Worth and P. Schcid (IY76). Gas-blood P,,,, equilibration in parabronchial lungs of
bards. .I. .-1/~p/. P/)~.\iol. 41 : 302 309. Molony. V., W. Graf and P. Scheid ( 1976). Effects of CO, on pulmonary atr flow reststance in the duck.
Rc.vpir. P/~‘lnGi. 26: 333 349
Piiper. J. (1962). Thcoretischr Untersuchung fiber die alveolar-capillare O,-Diffusion bei verschiedenen
Annahmcn t’iber dtc Lage des Diffuaionswiderstandes. [email protected] Arch. +‘.v. P/rj~.sio/. 275: 173 192.
Pitper, J. (1969). Apparent increase of the 0: diffusing capacity with increased OL uptake in inhomo-
geneous lungs: theory. Rv.tpir. Phj,.tiol. 6: 20Y II X.
Piiper. J.. P. Dejours, P. Haab and H. Rahn (1971). Concepts and basic quantittes m gas exchange
physiology. Rr.spir. P/r~~.tio/. 13: 2Y2 304.
Piipcr. J. and P. Schetd (1973). Gas exchange in avian lungs: models and experimental evidence. In:
Comparative Physiology. edited by L. Bolis. K. Schmidt-Nielsen and S. H. P. Maddrell. Amsterdam.
North-Holland. pp. I61 185.
Piiper. J. and P. Schcid (lY75). Gas transport efficacy of gills, lungs and skin: theory and experimental
data. Rev/C. P/~j~.\io/. ‘3 : 20’) 12 I.
Piiper. J. and P. Schetd (1977). Comparative phystology of respiration: Functional analysis of gas
exchange organs in vertebrates. In: International Review of Physiology. Vol. 14. Respiratory
Physiology II. edtted by J. G. Widdicombe. Baltimore, Md., University Park. pp. 2 19-253.
Reid. R. C. and T. K. Sherwood ( 1966). The Properties ofGases and Liquids, 2nd ed. New York. McGraw-
Hill.
Scheid. P. and J. Piiper ( 1970). Analysis of gas exchange in the avian lung: Theory and experiments in
the domestic fowl. Rcvpir. PI~~~.viol. 9: 246~ 262.
Scheid. P.. F. Adaro, J. Teichmann and J. Piiper (1973). Rebreathing and steady state pulmonary Do2
in the dog and in inhomogeneous lung models. Respir. Physiol. IS: 258-272.
Sikand, R. S., H. Magnussen. P. Scheid and J. Piiper (1976). Convective and diffusive gas mixing in
human lungs: experiments and model analysis. J. Appl. f’/~~~.sio/. 40: 362-371.
Weis-Fogh, T. (1964). Diffusion in insect wing muscle. the most active tissue known. J. Evp. Biol. 41 : 229-256.
West. J. B.. J. B. Glazier, J. M. B. Hughes and J. E. Maloney (1969). Pulmonary capillary flow. diffusion.
ventilation and gas exchange. In: Circulatory and Respiratory Mass Transport, edited by G. E. W.
Wolstenholme and J. Knight. London, Churchill. pp. 256-272.
Zeuthen. E. (1942). The ventilation of the respiratory tract in birds. Kg/. Dan. Vidmsk. Se/.&. Biol. Medd.
17: I 50.