table of contents for technology transfer and … · 2012. 2. 3. · diagnostic imaging jason shear...
Post on 10-Sep-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORTECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND RESEARCH COMMITTEE
Committee Meeting: 2/8/2012San Antonio, Texas
James D. Dannenbaum, ChairmanR. Steven Hicks, Vice ChairmanAlex M. CranbergPrintice L. GaryBrenda Pejovich
Committee Meeting
Page
Convene 10:00 a.m.Chairman Dannenbaum
1. U. T. System: Report on Chancellor's Technology Commercialization Advisory Council
10:00 a.m.Report/DiscussionMr. Allinson
293
2. U. T. System: Report on U. T. Horizon Fund 10:20 a.m.Report/DiscussionMr. Allinson
303
3. U. T. System: Report on Request for Proposals for novel programs in innovation and entrepreneurship
10:30 a.m.Report/DiscussionDr. Hurn
307
4. U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Report on key findings from the Institute for Cancer Care Excellence,including use of electronic medical records
10:45 a.m.Report/DiscussionThomas W. Feeley, M.D., Vice President, Medical Operations, U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
311
Adjourn 11:00 a.m.
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
292
1. U. T. System: Report on Chancellor's Technology Commercialization Advisory Council
REPORT
Mr. Bryan Allinson, Executive Director for Technology Commercialization, will report on the creation and plans for the Chancellor's Technology Commercialization Advisory Council to serve as a group of high-impact industry advisors to U. T. System. Fourteen high-impact individuals from strategic industry sectors, including healthcare, engineering, energy, and IT/Software, have accepted the invitation to serve in this role.
The Council will hold its initial meeting in Spring 2012. There will be a regular meeting each fall. The Council will interact with representatives from U. T. System institutions and U. T. System staff to serve as advisors to technology commercialization at U. T. System.
Mr. Allinson's presentation is set forth on the following pages.
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
293
U. T. SystemChancellor’s TechnologyCommercialization Advisory Council
Mr. Bryan Allinson, Executive Director for Technology Commercialization
U. T. System Board of Regents’ MeetingTechnology Transfer and Research CommitteeFebruary 2012
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
294
Purpose and Activities
• The Chancellor’s Technology Commercialization Advisory Council will serve as a group of advisors.
• The Chancellor has nominated fourteen (14) individuals, each having a term of two (2) or three (3) years.
• Industry sector expertise matches core technology & research areas of U. T. having commercial potential. areas of U. T. having commercial potential.
• U. T. System is in process of developing a briefing booklet to the Council, a portion is highlighted on the following slides:
2
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
295
Research Trends: Steady Growth; Federal % Peaked ‘03
3
• Research expenditures have been steadily increasing• Federal research portion peaked in 2003• Increasing portion of recent growth from local and private sources
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
296
Performance Metrics: Overall Steady, Up in 2 Areas
2nd in Total Research Funding2nd in Startups created4th in Licenses executed
Total Research Expenditures
Total Patent Applications (New, U.S.)
Issued Patents
Licenses License income
Startups
U.C. System U.C. System U.C. System U.C. System City of Hope U.C. System
U. T. System U. T. System Stanford StanfordNorth-western
U. T. System
4th in U.S. Patents Issued8th in U.S. Patent Applications
18th in License Income
U. T. System U. T. System Stanford Stanfordwestern
U. T. System
Johns Hopkins MIT MIT Washington NYU Utah
MIT Johns Hopkins U. T. System U. T. System Columbia Toronto
Michigan California Institute of Technology
California Institute of Technology
MIT Sloan Kettering MIT
Wisconsin Stanford Wisconsin Georgia U. T. System (18th) Brigham
Young
4
* Source: Association of University Technology Managers STATT (Statistical Access for Technology Transfer)
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
297
Market Dynamics: Patent Filings based onEvaluation of Market Opportunities
5
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
298
Institution & Faculty Activities: Patent Asset Positions
Inventor (% of patents) Institution and Field
Philip Thorpe (8.1%) UTSWMC, Cancer Immunopharmacology
Gabriel Lopez-Berestein(7.8%)
UTMDACC, Medicine and Experimental Therapeutics
Jonathan Sessler (6.6%) UT Austin, Chemistry
Jack Roth (6.3%) UTMDACC, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Gregory Hemmi (5.4%) UT Austin (formerly), Chemistry
UT Austin, 787
UTHSCH, 224
UTMB, 206
UT Arlington,
187
UTD, 156
UTEP, 63 UTSA, 21
UTHSCT, 14 UTPA, 7 UTPB, 1UTT, 1
6
Gregory Hemmi (5.4%) UT Austin (formerly), Chemistry
Frederick Becker (5.2%) UTMDACC, Molecular Pathology
Wadih Arap (5.1%) UTMDACC, Experimental Diagnostic Imaging
Jason Shear (4.8%) UT Austin, Chemistry
Andras Konya (4.7%) UTMDACC, Interventional Radiology
Sophia Ran (4.7%) UTSWMC (formerly), Medical Microbiology and ImmunologyInstitution, # Patents
UTSWMC, 620
UTMDACC, 589
UTHSCSA, 248
UTHSCH, 224
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
299
Multi-Institutional Thematic Mapping: Patent TextClustering around Technology Fields
Broad classifications
7
Targeted classifications
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
300
Industry Innovators: Forward & Backward PatentCitation Mapping as a Proxy
(M. I. T..)
(Univ. Washington)
(Fanuc Robotics)
8
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
301
Goal: Utilize the Council to Evaluate Strategy andOpportunities
Strategy &
Market Dynamics
Research TrendsPerformance
Metrics
9
Multi-Institutional Thematic Mapping
OpportunitiesInstitution &
Faculty ActivitiesIndustry
Innovators
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
302
2. U. T. System: Report on U. T. Horizon Fund
REPORT
Mr. Bryan Allinson, Executive Director for Technology Commercialization, will provide an update on the status of the U. T. Horizon Fund, which was detailed at the August 2011 Technology Transfer and Research Committee meeting and approved by the Board of Regents as part of the operating budgets for Fiscal Year 2012.
Mr. Allinson's presentation is set forth on the following pages.
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
303
Report on U. T. Horizon Fund
Mr. Bryan Allinson, Executive Director for Technology Commercialization
U. T. System Board of Regents’ MeetingTechnology Transfer and Research CommitteeFebruary 2012
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
304
Activities To Date
• Approved by U. T. System Board of Regents August 2011• December 2011
The Steering Committee concludes review Horizon Fund Advisory Committee formed
• January 2011 The U. T. Horizon Fund announcement released An analytical model initiated to analyze each of U. T. System’s equity An analytical model initiated to analyze each of U. T. System’s equity
80+ startups; 300+ hrs. expected required A graduate student Fellowship (internship) is announced to help prepare
analytic model, review specific companies, and provide experiential learning to U. T. students
2
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
305
Analytical Model
• U. T. System Office of Technology Commercialization will review a “look-back” of prior opportunities: Assess feasibility and potential for return from prior opportunities Compare to results from other universities (where available) Calculate what the returns might have been if U. T. System had invested
historically• Approach: • Approach:
Include all known information on Venture Capital or strategic partner backed companies, regardless of outcome (successful, failed, still private)
Use the data as a directional indicator of the quality of the pool of companies (not necessarily a forecast)
Monitor assumptions
3
Meeting of the U
. T. S
ystem B
oard of Regents - T
echnology Transfer and R
esearch Com
mittee
306
3. U. T. System: Report on Request for Proposals for novel programs in innovation and entrepreneurship
REPORT
Dr. Patricia Hurn, Associate Vice Chancellor for Health Research, will report on the intent to put forth to all U. T. System campuses a Request for Proposals (RFP) to develop novel faculty or graduate student programs that center on education in innovation and entrepreneurship.
The program proposal is set forth on the following pages.
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
307
Prepared by: Dr. Patricia HurnDate: January 2012
Request for Novel programs in education for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Rationale
There is an emerging call for research universities to serve as entrepreneurial centers that drive research breakthroughs and discover solutions to large-scale scientific and social problems. Examples of such global challenges include climate change, extreme poverty, the shortage of clean water, and the human epidemic of obesity.
American research universities have been at the heart of innovation throughout the history of our country. One only has to review the research portfolios of Stanford University, MIT, University of Michigan, UC Berkeley, UT Austin, UT Southwestern Medical Center, and UT MD Anderson Cancer Center to identify major discoveries that have been realized and that are generating significant dollars to the institution and high-impact societal benefit. Examples include discovery and manufacturing of drugs that reduce mortality for many cancer patients that previously had no hope for the future. Consider also the development of polymer chemistry or biopolymers that has allowed the field to discover significant functions of enzymes.
However, many argue that innovation and entrepreneurial activity must grow exponentially if we are to continue to advance American science and technology. One view is that now, in our time of great financial crisis, universities must use their intellectual capital and financial resources to tackle global challenges and transform our future. The nation’s research universities were originally created by entrepreneurial acts in and of themselves, and those who support these institutions fully expect them to lead the way in innovation.
The institutions of UT System are an ideal ground from which to advance a highly-visible,cross-institutional culture that fosters entrepreneurship rather than entrenched “silo” thinking. To accomplish such goals, fresh, new methodologies must be developed that will advance the education of established and budding scientists and train research leaders who are facile in forming academic-industry partnerships and creating companies and enterprises.
Program Strategy and general objectives
The purpose of this proposal is to fund educational projects and programs that accelerate entrepreneurship and innovation not only in the sciences, engineering, and medical sciences, but in all fields at The University of Texas System institutions. It is clear that entrepreneurship and innovation are at the heart of universities and that we must foster these two essential characteristics that make our institutions the best in this country and beyond.
We propose to invest in novel programs in education for entrepreneurship and innovation that will 1) develop and implement plans to deliver training for current faculty members and doctoral students throughout the UT System in entrepreneurship, innovation, and
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
308
Prepared by: Dr. Patricia HurnDate: January 2012
commercialization; 2) develop a strategy to provide seed funding for multidisciplinary and innovative research groups that can develop new platforms whose application could impact large, intractable problems, and the commercialization applications that may spawn from such platforms; and 3) create an entrepreneurship curriculum, for both faculty and doctoral students, that integrates academic rigor and real-world experience by bringing established professionals into the classroom as guest lecturers to teach all students about enterprise creation.
Program Criteria
The proposed educational effort will be innovative and potentially transformative, NOT a replication or refinement of an existing program.
Duplication of existing programs from UT institutions or outside institutions will not be considered.
Long-term formal coursework is acceptable, but not necessarily required. Formats such as short-term, high intensity workshops or summer session programs will be considered and may advance the goals of this funding opportunity.
The proposed educational offering must have the potential for wide adaptability throughout the UT System.
Sound educational and evaluation principles must be applied. The principal investigator (P.I.) must be a full-time or part-time faculty member at a
UT System academic institution.
Specifics
1. Two grants of $750,000 each will be awarded.2. A portion of the funds may be used to support innovative projects created pursuant to
development of the educational program by student participants.3. Deliverables include a yearly work in progress statement, including measurable
outcomes and metrics, and a detailed evaluation at end of project.4. Indicate institutional support for the time paid for by the grant.5. Salary and proportional fringe benefits included, but no indirect costs are allowed.6. P.I.s must be full-time or part-time faculty at UT System academic institutions.7. Submit appropriate letters supporting implementation of the innovation as described
in the proposal.8. P.I.’s time must be included in budget.9. Indicate the institutional match if available.10. Multidisciplinary collaborative approaches are preferred.
Process
Pre‐proposal letter of intent should be submitted electronically in PDF format and must include:
A. Background with statement of need and significance B. Project description C. Methodology = objectives
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
309
Prepared by: Dr. Patricia HurnDate: January 2012
D. Outcome measures E. Estimated total budget – no detail F. Up to 5 pages
Time Line
Request for Letters of Intent Feb 15, 2012
Letter of intent due March 1, 2012Invitations for full proposals March 15, 2012Full proposals due April 15, 2012Awards announced May 15, 2012
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
310
4. U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Report on key findings from the Institute for Cancer Care Excellence, including use of electronic medical records
REPORT
Thomas W. Feeley, M.D., Vice President of Medical Operations at U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, will report on key findings from U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's Institute for Cancer Care Excellence. The Institute, which is led by Dr. Feeley, performs research in cancer care delivery with a focus on patient care outcomes, costs, and the development of quality measurement methodologies. Dr. Feeley will present a unique use of electronic medical records that has broad application throughout health care delivery.
As part of the Institute, Clinic Station Outbound, a web portal for patients and outside physicians (also known as Personal Health Record), centers on how to engage patients and referring physicians in improving the safety and efficiency of the care experience. Dr. Feeley has spearheaded an internally developed electronic medical record system that is viewed by patients and referring physicians across the country and around the world via the patient portal, myMDAnderson.
Dr. Feeley is the Helen Shafer Fly Distinguished Professor of Anesthesiology. Dr. Feeley received both his undergraduate degree and his M.D. from Boston University and he trained in anesthesiology and critical care medicine at Harvard University's Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts. Following a 20-year career as a faculty member in anesthesiology and critical care medicine at Stanford University, he came to U. T. M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in 1997 to lead the Division of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, which is responsible for all anesthetic, critical care, and pain management in the institution. In addition to his administrative responsibilities, Dr. Feeley provides patient care services in the delivery of anesthesia.
Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents - Technology Transfer and Research Committee
311
top related