overview neel reilley

IHS HIV Program Update

May 2012

IHS HIV Program Update

May 2012

1

Discussion OverviewDiscussion Overview

• Programmatic Update– AI/AN Epidemiology– New Resources– IHS HIV/AIDS Program Initiatives

• Where We Are Headed• Program Performance

• Programmatic Update– AI/AN Epidemiology– New Resources– IHS HIV/AIDS Program Initiatives

• Where We Are Headed• Program Performance

2

EpidemiologyEpidemiology

Including CDC-Generated Statistics

Including CDC-Generated Statistics

3

AI/AN HIV EpidemiologyAI/AN HIV Epidemiology

• HIV Estimates, 20091

– Incidence rate : 14.1/100K– About 26% AI/AN People Living with HIV were estimated

to be unaware of status• HIV Diagnosis, 20082

– Prevalence (# living with diagnosed HIV infection): 2,387• AIDS Diagnosis, since 1985

– AI/AN ever diagnosed with AIDS (estimated): 3,7023

• HIV Estimates, 20091

– Incidence rate : 14.1/100K– About 26% AI/AN People Living with HIV were estimated

to be unaware of status• HIV Diagnosis, 20082

– Prevalence (# living with diagnosed HIV infection): 2,387• AIDS Diagnosis, since 1985

– AI/AN ever diagnosed with AIDS (estimated): 3,7023

1Estimated rates of new HIV infections, 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia, 20092Diagnosis from 40 states and 5 dependent areas, 2008

3 All states and 5 dependent areas, 20094

Rates of HIV Infection Diagnosis/ 100K* Rates of HIV Infection Diagnosis/ 100K*

*40 states with long-term confidential name-based HIV infection reporting

Dependent areas not included due to limited census information

(Adults/Adolescents/Children)

5

AI/AN HIV EpidemiologyAI/AN HIV Epidemiology• HIV diagnosis rate for AI/AN men (18.4 per 100K)

slightly higher than white men (14.8)• HIV diagnosis rate for AI/AN women (6.6) more than

double the rate for white women (2.4)

• HIV diagnosis rate for AI/AN men (18.4 per 100K) slightly higher than white men (14.8)

• HIV diagnosis rate for AI/AN women (6.6) more than double the rate for white women (2.4)

Diagnosis from 40 states only, 2009 6

Proportion of Persons Surviving following an AIDS Diagnosis 2001-2005

7

New Resources of NoteNew Resources of Note

8

Epidemiology ResourceEpidemiology Resource• http://www.cdc.gov/Features/AtlasTool/• http://www.cdc.gov/Features/AtlasTool/

9

10

New WebsiteNew Website• http://www.ihs.gov/hivaids/• http://www.ihs.gov/hivaids/

11

AIDS 2012AIDS 2012• IHS presence• HUB opportunities

– Applications open now– Applications close on September 15, 2012– Recorded sessions will be available free of charge– http://www.aids2012.org/hubs.aspx

• Technical Assistance

• IHS presence• HUB opportunities

– Applications open now– Applications close on September 15, 2012– Recorded sessions will be available free of charge– http://www.aids2012.org/hubs.aspx

• Technical Assistance

12

IHS HIV/AIDS Program Initiatives:

IHS HIV/AIDS Program Initiatives:

Secretary’s Minority AIDS Initiative Fund

Secretary’s Minority AIDS Initiative Fund

13

Major IHS HIV InitiativesMajor IHS HIV Initiatives

• Enhanced Medical Information Technology • Patient-Centered Delivery of Medical Services/

Enhancing Continuity of Care• Clinical Capacity Enhancements and Hepatitis

Integration into Care• Effective Behavioral Interventions• Media Interventions (esp. youth and LGBT)• Continued Testing Expansions and Technical Assistance

• Enhanced Medical Information Technology • Patient-Centered Delivery of Medical Services/

Enhancing Continuity of Care• Clinical Capacity Enhancements and Hepatitis

Integration into Care• Effective Behavioral Interventions• Media Interventions (esp. youth and LGBT)• Continued Testing Expansions and Technical Assistance

14

15

IHS HIV Program Partnerships, 2009

Where Are We Headed?Where Are We Headed?

• Effective Behavioral Interventions Outcomes Dissemination

• Expanded relationships with Tribes and Communities: Including consultation

• Further expansion of HIV Testing• Improving linkages to care, engagement in

care• Improving integration with other IHS

programs and services• Reporting, monitoring and evaluation of

programs: HHS Streamlining of Metrics• Further growth of the HIV network in I/T/U

• Effective Behavioral Interventions Outcomes Dissemination

• Expanded relationships with Tribes and Communities: Including consultation

• Further expansion of HIV Testing• Improving linkages to care, engagement in

care• Improving integration with other IHS

programs and services• Reporting, monitoring and evaluation of

programs: HHS Streamlining of Metrics• Further growth of the HIV network in I/T/U 16

Program Performance and Measurement

How are we doing?

Program Performance and Measurement

How are we doing?

17

4 Performance Measures2010

4 Performance Measures2010

1. HIV Screening of 13-64 y.o.: 7%2. Prenatal HIV Screening (GPRA): 82%3. Comprehensive of STI+ patients: 31%4. Chlamydia screening of sexually active 15-24

y.o. females annually: 26%

All 4 measures based on national guidelines and recommendations

1. HIV Screening of 13-64 y.o.: 7%2. Prenatal HIV Screening (GPRA): 82%3. Comprehensive of STI+ patients: 31%4. Chlamydia screening of sexually active 15-24

y.o. females annually: 26%

All 4 measures based on national guidelines and recommendations

18

Reducing Infections: ScreeningReducing Infections: Screening

Number of HIV Tests Performed per Year 2000 - 2010

19

Impact: GPRA Prenatal HIV Screening

20

Successful ScreeningSuccessful Screening• Sites understand screening rationale

• Use of standing protocols or clinical reminders for patients eligible for screening

• Medical team comfortable offering HIV test and test results

• Clear responsibility for who offers HIV test

• Clear linkage to care for HIV+

• Generally “provider-endorsed, nurse-driven”

• Sites understand screening rationale

• Use of standing protocols or clinical reminders for patients eligible for screening

• Medical team comfortable offering HIV test and test results

• Clear responsibility for who offers HIV test

• Clear linkage to care for HIV+

• Generally “provider-endorsed, nurse-driven”

Successful screeningSuccessful screening

• Replicates exisiting prenatal HIV screening practices

• Replicates exisiting prenatal HIV screening practices

22

Reminder/Dialogue ChallengesReminder/Dialogue Challenges

• Inaccurate

• Too many

• Inflexible

• Inaccurate

• Too many

• Inflexible

Deploying Reminders (AK site method)

Deploying Reminders (AK site method)

1) Pilot test and refine with 1-2 providers2) Deploy reminder with all providers3) Data feedback for providers to teams to see

screening scores (iCare)4) Delegate screenings away from physicians5) Each professional only sees a subset of total

reminders

source: Onders et. al. JAMIA [in press]

1) Pilot test and refine with 1-2 providers2) Deploy reminder with all providers3) Data feedback for providers to teams to see

screening scores (iCare)4) Delegate screenings away from physicians5) Each professional only sees a subset of total

reminders

source: Onders et. al. JAMIA [in press]

New measureNew measure

• HCV screening, once only, birth cohort of persons born 1945-1965

• Already incorporated in CRS logic as national indicator

• HCV screening, once only, birth cohort of persons born 1945-1965

• Already incorporated in CRS logic as national indicator

26

Thank YouThank You

Lisa C. Neel, MPHProgram Analyst, HIV ProgramIHS Headquarters801 Thompson Ave, Suite 304BRockville, MD 20852(301) 443-4305lisa.neel@ihs.gov

http://www.ihs.gov/hivaids/

Lisa C. Neel, MPHProgram Analyst, HIV ProgramIHS Headquarters801 Thompson Ave, Suite 304BRockville, MD 20852(301) 443-4305lisa.neel@ihs.gov

http://www.ihs.gov/hivaids/

27