ambient noise measurements for seismic response and

46
1 AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND EXPLORATION OF SEDIMENTARY LAYERS: CASE OF KIRYAT SHEMONA May 2010 No 500/522/10 Principal Investigator: Dr. Y. Zaslavsky, Collaborators: G. Ataev, M. Kalmanovich, M. Gorstein, T. Aksinenko, V. Giller, N. Perelman, I. Livshits, D. Giller, I. Dan, A. Shvartsburg and Dr. A. Shapira

Upload: others

Post on 27-Apr-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

1

AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR

SEISMIC RESPONSE AND EXPLORATION OF

SEDIMENTARY LAYERS: CASE OF KIRYAT

SHEMONA

May 2010 No 500/522/10

Principal Investigator:

Dr. Y. Zaslavsky,

Collaborators:

G. Ataev, M. Kalmanovich, M. Gorstein, T. Aksinenko, V. Giller,

N. Perelman, I. Livshits, D. Giller, I. Dan, A. Shvartsburg and

Dr. A. Shapira

Page 2: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

2

CONTENTS

ABSTRACT ................................................................................................ 5

1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 6

2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING ..................................................................... 7

3. RECORDING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING ......................... 9

4. COMPARISON OF H/V SPECTRAL RATIOS FROM AMBIENT

NOISE AND SEISMIC EVENTS ............................................................ 11

5. DISTRIBUTION OF H/V RESONANCE FREQUENCY AND THEIR

ASSOCIATED AMPLITUDE LEVELS. ................................................ 13

6. ESTIMATION OF S-WAVE VELOCITY MODELS ......................... 17

7. RECONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE ................. 26

7.1 Profile A ....................................................................................... 26

7.2 Profile B ........................................................................................ 30

7.3 Estimating the thickness of soft sediments. ................................. 32

8. SEISMIC HAZARD MICROZONATION .......................................... 32

CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................... 39

ACKNOWLEDGMENT .......................................................................... 41

REFERENCES ......................................................................................... 42

Page 3: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

3

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1. Part of the Geological map (1:50,000) by A. Sneh and R.Weinberger (2003),

also showing the location of the measurement points and reference places. ................. 8

Figure 2. Comparison between average H/V (solid line) and Hsite/Hbedrock spectral

ratios (dashed line) obtained at 3 places RL1, RL2 and RL3 indicated in Figure 1. ... 11

Figure 3. Average H/V spectral ratios for Kiryat Shemona strong motion station

obtained from: two horizontal accelerograms of Beirut earthquake (thick line),

seismogram of eight local and regional earthquakes (shaded line) and ambient noise

(thin line). ..................................................................................................................... 12

Figure 4. Examples of the individual and average H/V spectral ratios in the Kiryat

Shemona. ...................................................................................................................... 14

Figure 5. Distribution of the H/V resonance frequency in the Kiryat Shemona. ......... 15

Figure 6. Distribution of the H/V amplitude level in the Kiryat Shemona. ................. 16

Figure 7. The Geological map of the Kiryat Shemona (1:50,000) by A. Sneh and

R.Weinberger (2003), also showing the location of wells and refraction lines used in

this study. The straight lines A and B show the position of the geological cross

sections constructed in this study. ................................................................................ 18

Figure 8. a) Comparison between H/V spectrum ratios (red lines) and analytical

transfer functions computed using refraction survey data (black lines) at sites along

the refraction line3; b) velocity-depth section along the refraction line3. ................... 20

Figure 9. a) Comparison between H/V spectrum ratios (red lines) and analytical

transfer functions computed using refraction survey data (black lines) at sites along

the refraction line5; b) velocity-depth section along the refraction line5. ................... 21

Figure 10. a) Lithological section of well QS; b) Vs-depth section of well QS, derived

from interpretation of H/V spectra at point 102; c) comparison between H/V spectra at

point102 (red line) and the analytical transfer function (black line). .......................... 22

Figure 11. a) Lithological section of well Hula-1; b)Vs-depth section of well Hula-1,

derived from interpretation of H/V spectra at point 86; c) comparison between H/V

spectra at point 86(red line) and analytical transfer function ( black line). ................. 23

Figure 12. The schematic map of the average S-wave velocity of the soft sedimentary

layer, derived from H/V spectral ratio analyses. Positions of the refraction lines are

shown by red lines. ...................................................................................................... 25

Figure 13. Schematic geological cross-section A constructed on the base of ambient

vibration data analysis.................................................................................................. 27

Page 4: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

4

Figure 14. H/V spectral ratio at site 99, which shows absence of site effect, and

comparison of the average H/V spectral ratios (red lines) with the analytical transfer

functions (black lines) for other sites along profile A. ................................................ 28

Figure 15. Schematic geological cross-section B constructed on the base of ambient

vibration data analysis.................................................................................................. 31

Figure 16. Comparison of the average H/V spectral ratios (red lines) with the

analytical transfer functions (black lines) for sites along profile B. ............................ 31

Figure 17. The schematic map of the sediment thickness, inferred from H/V spectral

ratio analyses also shows the faults in the Kiryat Shemona ........................................ 33

Figure 18. Seismic microzonation map of the Kiryat Shemona. ................................. 35

Figure 19. Generalized 1D soil columns for each zone. .............................................. 35

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Parameters of earthquake recorded by accelerometer station and are used in

this study. Distance is to the surface projection of the rupture. ................................... 12

Table 2. List of earthquakes used in this study. Eq.- earthquake; Md . – duration

magnitude (Mw – moment magnitude)........................................................................ 13

Table 3. Geotechnical data from refraction survey in the Kiryat Shemona................. 18

Table 4. S-wave velocities model of the Kiryat Shemona area. .................................. 24

Table 5. Parameters of generalized 1D soil columns and acceleration spectrums. ..... 36

Page 5: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

5

ABSTRACT

Damage distribution during moderate earthquakes is frequently controlled by site

effect. Subsoil impedance contrast can significantly amplify the shaking level, as well as

increase the duration of strong ground motion. During a measurement campaign in 2002,

instrumental ambient noise recording were conducted at 300 sites in and around the Kiryat

Shemona (Zaslavsky et al., 2002). Two methods were applied to estimate site effects: (1)

horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (H/V) of the ambient motions at the investigated site; (2)

horizontal-to horizontal spectra ratios of motions recorded simultaneously at the investigated

site and at a reference site. In this stage, two maps that reflected fundamental characteristics

of site effects were prepared: distribution of the fundamental frequency and its associated

H/V level. The survey suggests site amplifications in the order of 2.0- 8.0 over the frequency

range 0.7-14.0 Hz. These results imply significant variations in the shear-wave velocities

across the area and considerable variations of sediments thickness. Unfortunately, in 2002

there was no available geotechnical and geophysical information.

In the following years the Geophysical Institute of Israel have carried out few seismic

refraction lines in the investigated area that allowed calibrating experimental H/V spectral

ratios obtained along these lines using analytical 1D model. Later on, the Vs and thickness of

sediments were calculated by fitting analytical function to empirical H/V ratios for every

measurement point. In addition, we determined the area of expansion of different reflectors

and constructed two contour maps: shear-wave velocity of sediments and its thickness in the

study area. In addition, in this Report we present part of the Kiryat Shemona fault (left lateral

offset along the Dead Sea Rift) not mapped previously by geological survey that was detected

by ambient vibration measurements.

We divided the study area into eight zones. The grouping is done manually taking into

consideration the fundamental frequency, H/V amplitude and the shape of the response

function. The Uniform hazard site-specific acceleration spectra for all zones were computed

for a probability of exceedence 10% during an exposure time of 50 years and a damping ratio

of 5%. The shape of the spectra obtained for all zones differ significantly from those

prescribed by Israel Building Code (IS-413). IS-413 essentially underestimates the

accelerations in the period range from 2 sec. to 0.1 sec. These evaluations are very important

for realistic assessment of the vulnerabilities of all types of existing and newly designed

structures and for urban and land use planning.

Page 6: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

6

1. INTRODUCTION

Kiryat Shemona is a relatively small town (about 22 000 inhabitants), situated in the

northern part of Israel alongside the Hula Valley between two major segments of the Dead

Sea fault system. Two most recent destructive earthquakes in this region occurred in 1759

and in 1837. These earthquakes had a maximum intensity X on the MM scale and caused

severe damage and loss of life in the northern Levant, presently Israel, Syria, Jordan and

Lebanon (Amiran at al., 1994).

In the process of assessing the seismic hazard to the Kiryat Shemona area, we have

investigated the possibility of site amplification effects that might enhance the earthquake

risk to the town. Various empirical techniques have been used to detect locations where site

effects are likely to occur. Kagami et al (1982) proposed that spectral ratio of horizontal

components of ambient vibration obtained in soil to those in the bedrock can be used for

ground motion amplification assessment. Nakamura (1989) hypothesized that spectral ratios

of horizontal versus vertical component (H/V ratios) of the ambient vibration represents the

site response to seismic waves. Recently, Seekins et al (1996), Chavez-Garcia and Cuenca

(1998), Zaslavsky et al (2003) and others have demonstrated that the two techniques provide

similar results.

In this study we performed ambient noise measurements at 300 locations on a dense

spatial grid from which we obtained a spatial distribution of the frequencies at which

amplification is likely to occur and the magnitude of the expected level of amplification at

those frequencies. These data were used to divide the study area into zones in which the

fundamental frequencies and the spectral ratio levels are similar. For each zone we developed

a subsurface model from which we determined the site response functions and evaluated the

uniform hazard site-specific acceleration spectra. The subsurface models were derived by

combining the results from the ambient noise measurements with available geological and

geophysical information. This approach has proven to yield a systematic representation of

basic structural parameters of the subsurface to be imbedded in earthquake hazard and risk

assessments.

Page 7: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

7

2. GEOLOGICAL SETTING

The town of Kiryat Shemona occupies a territory of 25 km2. It is located at the Kiryat

Shemona graben in close proximity to the Hula Valley - a structural part of the Dead Sea

fault system. The Kiryat Shemona fault (Figure 1), crossing the town in the west, is the

master fault (i.e., transform) which separates the African plate from the Arabian plate (Sneh

and Weinberger, 2003). The Margaliyyot fault branches off the Kiryat Shemona fault at the

southern entrance to Kiryat Shemona and then traces towards the northwest. In the north-west

of the study area the local Muftalah fault is characterized by throw direction unknown. The

faults of Tel-Hay and Shehumit trending in the north-south direction are also part of the Dead

Sea fault system and form the east boundary of the Kiryat Shemona graben.

The geology of the investigated area (Figure 1) is characterized by outcrops of basalt

flow of Pleistocene age. The tufa (travertine) overlies the basalt flows in the area between

Nahal Iyyon and the Hazbani River and exceeded 25m in thickness near HaGosherim. West

of Tel-Hay fault, the marl of Paleocene age covers a horst. Hard conglomerate of Miocene

age, dolomite and limestone of Cretaceous age crop out in the north-western part of the town.

The sandstone of the Kurnub Gr. (Lower Cretaceous age) is presented in the south-west.

There are a complex of slope movement material in the south-west of the Kiryat Shemona

area, composed of loam, debris and talus breccias of 15-70 m thick, which cover the basalt,

carbonate and sandstone.

The alluvium sediments occupy most part of the study area. They accumulated in the

Kiryat Shemona graben that merges in the south with the Hula Valley. Thickness of the

alluvium sediments changes from some meters in the northern part till 170meters in the

southern part of the study area. These deposits overlay the Plio-Pleistocene basalt flows.

Geological data show that in the most part of study area the basalt of Plio-Pleistocene

age is the hard base rock (reflector), which produced the site response. Also the carbonate

and conglomerate in the north-west of study area may produce the site response.

Page 8: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

8

Figure 1. Part of the Geological map (1:50,000) by A. Sneh and R.Weinberger (2003),

also showing the location of the measurement points and reference places.

Qiry

at

Sh

em

on

af

Marqaliyyot f.

Sh

eh

um

itf.

Te

l-H

ay f

.

Muft

ala

hf.

Alluvium

Slope movement material

(Late Pleistocene-Holocene)

Tufa (travertine)

(Pleistocene)

Basalt (Pleistocene)

Conglomerate

(Miocene)

Chalk

(Lower Eocene)

Marl (Paleocene)

Limestone & dolomite

(Albian -Cenomanian)

Sandstone (Barremian)

Measurement point

popointpointpoint 1

R2 5

1

R3

1

1

2R1 13

Accelerometer station

Reference line R 1

Page 9: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

9

3. RECORDING SYSTEM AND DATA PROCESSING

A microzonation study to investigate possible site effect was carried out through

ambient noise survey at 300 sites across the town using 250m grid between measurement

points. Two methods are used to estimate site effects: H/V spectral ratio and Hsite/Hbedrock

In our experimental set-up, each seismograph station consists of three (one vertical and

two horizontal) L4C velocity transducers (Mark Products) with a natural frequency of 1.0 Hz

and damping ratio 70% of critical. The recorded signals are sampled at 100 samples per

second and band-pass filtered between 0.2 Hz and 25 Hz. All the equipment: sensors, power

supply, amplifiers, personal computer and connectors are carried in a vehicle, which also

serves as a recording centre. The seismometers are fixed on levelled metal plate placed

directly on the ground. Prior to performing measurements, the individual seismometer

constants (natural frequency, damping and motor constant) are determined using sine and

step calibration signals, and then the frequency response functions of all channels are

computed. This procedure allows evaluating change of natural frequency and motor constant

(voltage sensitivity) during long time of measurements in harsh conditions in the free field.

The length of recorded ground motions (ambient noise) may affect the results and

influence the reliability and applicability of the technique. In our experiments, the ambient

noise is continuously recorded for 60-70 minutes, stored in a series of data files of 3 minutes

each. We compile a set of up to 50 selected time windows and then average the spectral ratio.

To study the characteristics of spectra of ambient noise signals, we compute Fourier

spectra and spectral ratios. The record length (time window) used for spectral calculations

depends on the fundamental frequency.

The H/V spectral ratios are obtained by dividing the individual spectrum of each of the

horizontal components [SNS(f) and SEW(f)] by the spectrum of the vertical component [SV(f)]:

fS

fSfA

V

NS

NS fS

fSfA

V

EW

EW

The average spectral ratio for each of two horizontal components is computed, if the curves

of average spectral ratios of the two components are similar then the average of the two

horizontal-to-vertical ratios is defined as:

n

i

n

i fi

S

fi

S

fi

S

fi

S

nfA

V

EW

V

NS

1 12

1

Page 10: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

10

As already observed by many researchers, there is high scatter in the H/V spectra. The

source of the scatter is debated between the researchers. Mucciarelli (1998), for example,

claims that traffic is not a major reason for the scatter and Horice et al. (2001) used noise

originated by passing traffic in their analysis. In a recent study, Parolai and Galiana-Merino

(2006) showed that the influence of transients on the H/V spectral ratio is insignificant. Our

observations indicate that the effect of transients is almost unnoticeable. In order to reduce

the scatter and increase stability, our processing scheme involves a careful manual selection

of the time windows from which we obtain the H/V functions. In selecting the time windows,

the analysts follow the concept that sites with no site effect should exhibit spectra of the H

and V components that are of the same level throughout the spectrum. At sites with

significant site effect, the spectra of the two components should differ only within a certain

limited frequency band, probably at the neighbourhood of the resonance frequency. Time

windows with spectra that exhibit such or similar conditions are selected. Evidently, this

practice has yielded an appreciated reduction in the H/V scatter.

In applying the second technique, one station that serves as a reference station is

located on a basalt outcrop throughout the duration of the experiment, while the other station

is moved from point to point. Due to practical limitations, we are able to carry out only three

such sets of measurements, marked as R1, R2 and R3 (see Figure 1) where the reference

station is within 400 meters from the investigated sites. Figure 2 shows the comparison

between the average Hsite/Hbedrock and H/V spectral ratios for different points on those

three places. The two functions showed similar peak values at the same fundamental

frequency clearly indicating that the two methods reflect the same characteristics of the local

site response. It is important to note that there are no significant differences in shapes of

spectral ratios. The marked rise in the H/V spectral ratios observed at a frequency near 0.3 Hz

(R2 place) is normally associated with ocean waves. Therefore, this peak is negligible in the

Hsite/Hbedrock spectral ratios.

Page 11: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

11

Figure 2. Comparison between average H/V (solid line) and Hsite/Hbedrock spectral

ratios (dashed line) obtained at 3 places RL1, RL2 and RL3 indicated in Figure 1.

4. COMPARISON OF H/V SPECTRAL RATIOS FROM AMBIENT

NOISE AND SEISMIC EVENTS

The theoretical background for use of ambient noise measurements in site response

investigations is debated. Not likewise, the association of H/V spectral ratio from earthquake

signals. The later clearly explains why H/V spectral ratios of S waves, often known as

receiver functions, are also representing the site amplification. It is thus interesting to

compare H/V spectral functions as obtained from ambient noise and earthquake recordings.

In our studies we analyze the H/V spectral ratios from ambient noise measurements and from

ground motion measurements generated by different sources of excitation: Local and regional

earthquakes recorded by different sensors i.e.; accelerometers and seismometers. The strong

motion station (Table 1) that recorded earthquake and used in this study is marked in the

Figure 1. The recorded earthquakes are presented in Table 2.

Figure 3 presents the calculated receiver function of a site in Kiryat Shemona, as evaluated

from the spectral ratio of strong motion recordings:

a. The H/V spectral ratio from two horizontal components of accelerograms of the

Beirut earthquake. This H/V function shows prominent peak near 4 Hz (f1) with an

amplification factor of about 4.5 and with a second peak near 8.0 Hz.

R1 R3

R2

Page 12: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

12

b. The average spectral ratio obtained from eight earthquakes (events 1 to 8 in Table1).

The average function also yields two peaks at frequency 4.5 Hz (with amplitude 4.5)

and 8.0 Hz.

c. The horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio from ambient noise shows two prominent

peaks near 4.5 Hz and 8.0 Hz in agreement with the resonance frequencies identified

by the receiver function.

Figure 3. Average H/V spectral ratios for Kiryat Shemona strong motion station

obtained from: two horizontal accelerograms of Beirut earthquake (thick line),

seismogram of eight local and regional earthquakes (shaded line) and ambient noise

(thin line).

Table 1. Parameters of earthquake recorded by accelerometer station and are used in

this study. Distance is to the surface projection of the rupture.

Site Date

yr/mo/dy

Origin

time

hr:mn:sec

MW

Geographic

coordinates Distance

(km) Region

Lat.(N) Long.(E)

Kiryat Shemona 97/08/04 11:29:46 4.0 33.26 35.73 14 Beirut

Page 13: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

13

Table 2. List of earthquakes used in this study. Eq.- earthquake; Md . – duration

magnitude (Mw – moment magnitude).

As mentioned above, site effect may be strongly influenced by soil structure interaction. In

our case the strong motion station is located in a cellar of a-two-stories building. The Fourier

amplitude spectra from wind excitation recorded on the roof allowed establishing that f2~8

Hz is the fundamental frequency of the building.

5. DISTRIBUTION OF H/V RESONANCE FREQUENCY AND THEIR

ASSOCIATED AMPLITUDE LEVELS.

Examples of the individual and average H/V spectral ratios, obtained in different parts

of study area are shown in Figure 4. In the most cases of the measurements the spectral ratios

have one distinct peak, which is the resonance frequency of soil. Presence of only one peak of

the resonance frequency characterizes of the uniform velocity section of the soft sediments

covering the hard rock. The resonance frequency is proportional to the S-wave velocity in the

soft layer and inversely proportional to its thickness. The height of the H/V peak depends on

the seismic impedance between the soil and the hard rock.

No. Site Date

yr/mo/dy

Origin

time

hr:mn:sec

Md

Geographic

coordinates Distance

km Region Type

Lat.(N) Long.(E)

1

Kiryat

Shemona.

99/03/25 16:37:11 3.6 36.46 31.04 560 East

Mediterr. Eq.

2 99/03/27 13:42:29 3.6 34.61 33.25 270 Cyprus Eq.

3 99/03/28 19:54:11 2.5 33.71 32.73 300 East

Mediterr. Eq.

4 99/04/06 00:08:25 W5.2 39.50 37.90 700 Turkey Eq.

5 99/04/07 08:55:48 3.0 34.01 21.89 350 East

Mediterr Eq.

6 99/04/08 00:13:17 3.9 35.92 27.02 830- Crete Eq. 7 99/04/10 22:46:09 3.4 35.68 28.16 740 East Crete Eq. 8 99/04/11 19:45:05 3.6 33.16 35.64 10 Golan Eq.

Page 14: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

14

0.7/3.4

QS201

1.6/3.1

QS75

2.9/2.7

QS17

3.4/8.4 QS47

10.3/4.5

QS241 4.6/6.2

QS26

Figure 4. Examples of the individual and average H/V spectral ratios in the Kiryat

Shemona.

We have constructed maps displaying the distribution of the observed resonance

frequencies (Figure 5.) and the associated H/V amplitude levels (Figure 6). The data exhibit

peaks changing from 2 to 8, occurring at frequencies 0.7 -14 Hz. We obtained almost flat

H/V ratios at sites where basalt, conglomerates, limestone and travertine are outcropped.

Exceptions are the site effects had obtained on the basalt outcrop along the front of youngest

the Hazbani basalt flows (Pleistocene), which covers the Meshki basalt flows (Pliocene).

Probably this can be explained by decrease of the thickness and S-velocity in the margins of

basalt lava. The erosion could be here the cause of decrease of the thickness and S-velocity.

Whereas, the S-velocity of Meshki basalt, which is reflector here, increases probably to the

south, farther from a source of volcanic flows. Our results show, with respect to the expected

site effects, that the area can be divided into two zones separated by the Shehumit and Tel

Hay faults. The first zone constitutes the built area of the town and is located in the Kiryat

Shemona graben.

Page 15: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

15

Figure 5. Distribution of the H/V resonance frequency in the Kiryat Shemona.

This zone is characterized by frequency anomalies of irregular shape with general trend

to decrease from 14 Hz in the north to 1 Hz in the south. These variations seem to coincide

with the variations in the depth to the basement. The significant increase of H/V ratios

amplitudes, reaching 8 in the central part of Kiryat Shemona is probably associated with

presence of loose alluvium deposits (i.e., low S-velocity) in this part of graben. Whereas the

coarse deposits are predominating in the west in the vicinity of the outcropping of

conglomerates and carbonate rock.

254000 256000

790000

792000

794000

14

no site effect

0.7

0.8

1

1.5

2

3

4

6

108

10

Page 16: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

16

Figure 6. Distribution of the H/V amplitude level in the Kiryat Shemona.

The second zone is located to the east of the Shehumit and Tel Hay faults and south to the

basalt outcropping. Gradual decrease of resonance frequency from 14 Hz to 0.7 Hz from the

north near the outcrop of basalt to the south is correlated with dipping of the basalts. Thus in

accordance to Hula 1 well that located in the southern part of the study area and reaching the

basalt flow at the depth of 170m. The great part of this zone is generally characterized by

790000

792000

794000

254000 256000

8

3

4

5

6

2

no site effect

Page 17: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

17

lesser variability and lower H/V spectral ratios (a level of 3-4). However, we observe a few

spots of high amplitudes in the vicinity of the basalt outcropping.

6. ESTIMATION OF S-WAVE VELOCITY MODELS

Fourier spectra parameters and spectral ratios analysis over the study area show good

correlation with variations in the subsurface geology and may be used to provide information

about S-wave velocities and sediment thickness.

Measurements of ambient noise were carried out very close to drilling sites where

geology data is available. We also used S-wave velocities and thickness of shallow sediments

from seven seismic refraction lines (Ezersky, Shtivelman 1999, Frieslander, Medvedev,

2002). Locations of wells and refraction lines, used in this study, are shown in Fig.7. Limited

data on S-wave velocities and sediment thickness obtained from seismic refraction surveys

and boreholes enable calibration of the H/V spectral ratio with an analytical site response

derived from a 1D subsurface model and then estimating the S-wave velocity profile at-depth.

Then we extrapolate neighbouring sites model, using H/V spectral observations and

information about the regional geology to constraint S-wave velocities of the lithological

units present in the area.

Table 3 presents the S-wave velocities and thicknesses of sediments from refraction

lines in the Kiryat Shemona (Ezersky, Shtivelman 1999, Frieslander, Medvedev, 2002).

Proceeding from geological condition and locations of the refraction lines, we started to

correlate S-wave velocities of the line 1: Vs=470m/s with the soil, Vs=760m/s and

Vs=1120m/sec with two facies of tufa (travertine) (Sneh and Weinberger, 2003). In this area

the tufa overlies the Hazbani basalt flows (Vs=1230m/s) (Sneh and Weinberger, 2003). S-

wave velocities of the line 2 could be correlated with the soil (Vs=640m/s), the Hazbani

basalt (Vs=970m/s) and the Meshki basalt (Vs~1500m/s). It is known that surface of basaltic

lava is clinker and blister, while inside mass is more dense and massive. First (Vs=150-

170m/s) and second layers with Vs= 350-730m/s of the lines 3, 4, 5, 6 corresponded to the

alluvium sediments. Refraction line 7(0015) was carried out on the landslide scar, therefore,

Vs=380-710m/s corresponded to the complex of slope movement material (loam, debris and

talus breccias).

Page 18: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

18

Figure 7. The Geological map of the Kiryat Shemona (1:50,000) by A. Sneh and

R.Weinberger (2003), also showing the location of wells and refraction lines used in this

study. The straight lines A and B show the position of the geological cross sections

constructed in this study.

Table 3. Geotechnical data from refraction survey in the Kiryat Shemona.

Refraction

lines

Layer 1 Layer 2 Layer 3

Vs, m/s Depth

interval, m Vs, m/s Depth interval, m Vs, m/s

Depth

interval, m

1 470 0-3 760 1120 3 to 20-

30

20-30 to

45-70 1230

30-80 and

below

2 640 5-7 970 5-7 to

15-25

1330 -

1500

15-25 and

below

Geological cross section

derived from H/V

measurements

Accelerometer station

Measurement point

popointpointpoint 1

Well

Qiry

at

Sh

em

on

af

Marqaliyyot f.

Sh

eh

um

itf.

Tel-

Hay f

.

Muft

ala

hf.

Hula 1

BH-1, 2

1

QS

7 4 5

2

1

6

3

Refraction lines (Ezersky,

Shtivelman, 1999,

Frieslander, Medvedev,

2002) B

A

Page 19: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

19

Third layer in all the refraction lines was correlated with the hard rock- basalt of Plio-

Pleistocene age. S-wave velocity of basalt changes from 1200m/s in the north (the

outcropping of basalt flows) to 2320m/s in the south of the investigated area. Within the area

of obtained site response, refraction lines 3-7 showed velocities of basalt 1820-2320m/s. It

supposed to be high seismic impedance producing the site effect.

As examples, Figs. 8 and 9 showed velocity- depth sections along refraction lines 3

and 5, correspondingly (locations see in Figure7), average H/V spectral ratios at points

located on the lines.

3 150 0 to 2-3 350 2-3 to 12-21 2000 12-21 and

below

4 170 0-4 500 4 to 17-30 2110 17-25 and

below

5 170 0-4 450 4 to 17-38 1820 17-38 and

below

6 170 0 to 5-13 240-450-730 5-13 to 85-115 2080-

2320

85-115 and

below

7(0015) 380 0-5 710 5 to 22-35 1850 22-35 and

below

a) 1 2

SPECTRAL

RATIO

SPECTRAL

RATIO

Page 20: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

20

Figure 8. a) Comparison between H/V spectrum ratios (red lines) and analytical transfer

functions computed using refraction survey data (black lines) at sites along the

refraction line3; b) velocity-depth section along the refraction line3.

As demonstrated by these examples, that resonance frequency has varied from point to point.

Here, over a distance of only about 200m it changes from 3.8 to 7.5 Hz.

To construct a velocity models for point 102 located near QS well (location see in

Figure7) we used boreholes data and Vs from Table 3.

-20

0

0 100 200

H

m

m

W E

Ab)

1 2 3 4

3 4

SPECTRAL

RATIO

SPECTRAL

RATIO

Page 21: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

21

Figure 9. a) Comparison between H/V spectrum ratios (red lines) and analytical transfer

functions computed using refraction survey data (black lines) at sites along the

refraction line5; b) velocity-depth section along the refraction line5.

0 100 200

-40

-20

0

H

m

NS

m

b) 1 2 3

3

2

1 a)

SPECTRAL

RATIO

SPECTRAL

RATIO

SPECTRAL

RATIO

Page 22: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

22

Well QS is located on the landslide scar and reached the basalt at the depth 64m.

Lithological section presented by slope movement materials with the prevalence of debris of

sandstone in the upper part and debris of the limestone in the low part (Figure10a).

Calculated analytical transfer function is compared with the empirical H/V spectral ratio at

point 102 (Figure 10). We obtained similar velocities to those of refraction line 7, located at a

distance of 1.5km to the north in the similar geological conditions.

Figure 10. a) Lithological section of well QS; b) Vs-depth section of well QS, derived

from interpretation of H/V spectra at point 102; c) comparison between H/V spectra at

point102 (red line) and the analytical transfer function (black line).

To estimate velocity model for point 86 (Hula-1 well), we used data Vs of alluvium and

Vs of basalt from Table 3 and borehole data. Well Hula-1 is placed in the southern part of the

study area (location see in Figure7) and penetrates the basalt flows at the depth 170 m. Figure

11 shows the lithological section of the well Hula-1, Vs-depth section, analytical transfer

function in comparison with observed H/V spectral ratio at point 86 located near the well.

Both functions have the same resonance frequency. We obtained similar velocities for

alluvium to those of refraction survey.

basalt

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

Dep

th

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Vsloam,

debris of

sandstone

and of

limestone

a) b)

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2

Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

c)

basalt gravel

Page 23: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

23

Figure 11. a) Lithological section of well Hula-1; b)Vs-depth section of well Hula-1,

derived from interpretation of H/V spectra at point 86; c) comparison between H/V

spectra at point 86(red line) and analytical transfer function ( black line).

Here (Figure11) we used S-wave velocity of basalt 2300m/s obtained from the

refraction line 6. When Vs=1800-2300m/s of basalt or its average value (Vs=2000m/s), was

used the accuracy of modeling was about 10-15%. Therefore, for all models of the study area,

we used Vs= 2000m/s of basalt flows, which is the main reflector.

As we noted above, the main reflector in the western part of study area may be the

carbonate of Albian and Cenomanian age. Its velocity Vs=1900m/s was already defined in

our previous works (Zaslavsky et al., 2001, 2004). Velocity of conglomerate (Miocene) also

was taken from previous works.

Based on our results of site effect investigation we constrained the Vs range for main

lithological units, present in the Kiryat Shemona area (Table 4). GEOLOGICAL MAP OF

ISRAEL (METULLA) (A. Sneh and R. Weinberger, 2003) also was used.

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2

Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

c)

-350

-300

-250

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Vs

a) b)

clay

gravel

basalt gravel

basalt

Page 24: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

24

Table 4. S-wave velocities model of the Kiryat Shemona area.

* Sediments were not contributing in the creating of the site effect.

Estimations of Vs velocities in the Kiryat Shemona area were constrained by borehole

and seismic refraction survey data. This information helped us to develop Vs models over the

study area, using H/V spectral ratios. It allowed us to construct the schematic map of the

average S-wave velocity of the sedimentary layer (Figure 12) within the area where the site

response was obtained. It is necessary to say that the upper layer with Vs=150-200m/s was

not accounted in the average S-wave velocity, because its thickness is less than 20% of the

depth to the reflector. As noted above, the spectral ratios have one peak of frequency in most

cases of measurements, that is evidence of uniform lithological section, where velocity

characteristics of the sediments change gradually. Therefore, we used the weighted average

of soft layer velocity for constructing this map in the landslide zone and in the weathered

basalt zone. The site effect is created by the seismic impedance between this soft layer and

the hard rock (reflector).

Lithological unit Vs,

m/s

Alluvium (Holocene) silt 150-200

clay, gravel 300-600

Slope movement material-loam, gravel of sandstone, limestone

(Late Pleistocene-Holocene) 400-700

Tufa (travertine)

(Pleistocene) *

upper 750

lower 1100

Basalt (Plio-Pleistocene) weathered 900-1000

Hazbani flow, Meshki flow 1800-2300

Conglomerate (Miocene) 750-900

Limestone & dolomite (Albian - Cenomanian) 1900

Page 25: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

25

Figure 12. The schematic map of the average S-wave velocity of the soft sedimentary

layer, derived from H/V spectral ratio analyses. Positions of the refraction lines are

shown by red lines.

The map (Figure12) is characterized by increase of velocity of the soft sediments from

northern and central parts of study area to the west of the town where slope movement

material is accumulated and to the south-east where thickness of sediments is increased. Zone

of Vs=900-1000m/s is the weathered basalt, on which surface site effect with low amplitude

was also observed.

254000 256000

790000

792000

794000

300

400

500

600

700

900

6

5

3

4

7

Page 26: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

26

7. RECONSTRUCTION OF SUBSURFACE STRUCTURE

To develop model of the subsurface and to estimate layer thicknesses, where borehole

data or other data are not available, we used the derived Vs model of study area and H/V

spectral information. The analytical transfer functions are consistent with the observed H/V

functions of each site. It has to be emphasized that in order to obtain accurate depth

estimations (within 30% of the real depth known from borehole data), it is required that the

grid of measured sites will be dense and uniform. A dense grid helps us to obtain models

that are consistent with all other geological information. In this study we have built the

geological structures along of two profiles A and B (location see in the Figure 7). The

directions of profiles are chosen while taking into account the distribution of the resonance

frequency together with the goal to demonstrate geological structural elements derived

from H/V measurements.

7.1 Profile A

Profile A crosses the study area from the north-west to the south-east (see Figure 7) and

is presented in Figure13. Comparison between H/V spectral ratios and calculated transfer

function at selected sites are shown in Figure14. H/V Ratios along the profile are

characterized by one peak of frequency, except the point 69, which showed two frequencies

with low amplitudes. The wide range of the resonance frequency (0.75-15Hz) reflects the

varying depth to the reflector. The corresponding H/V amplitudes reach a level of 8 at the

west (central part of the town). We could differentiate four tectonic blocks of the cross-

section by different intervals of frequency.

According to our modeling and geology data, in the western block of the profile (points

99 and 37), conglomerate of Miocene age is the main reflector with Vs=750-900m/s. In this

part of the study area (also see Figures 5, 6) seismic impedance between conglomerates,

which thickness are more than 400m (Sneh and Weinberger, 2003) and alluvium of some

meters thickness created the site effect with high resonance frequencies (6-14 Hz) and

corresponding amplitudes 2.5-4. Point 99 does not show the site effect, because is located on

the outcrop of conglomerate.

Sharp change of the resonance frequency from 13Hz to 6Hz and change in the

amplitudes suggest the existence of the fault between points 37 and 170 (Figure 14). This

fault may be the branch of the Muftalah fault which is situated in the similar direction about

500m west.

Page 27: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

27

Figure 13. Schematic geological cross-section A constructed on the base of ambient vibration data analysis.

99

37170 175 170 95 171 49 52

5759

68 69 176 221 202 203 174 173 80 81 88 87 86

0 1000 2000 3000 4000

Distance, m

-100

0

100

-100

0

100

200

300

Dep

th

Hula1

NW

SE

Sh

eh

um

it f

.

Tel

Hay f

.

Giv'at Shehumit

Basalt Vs=1000m/s

Basalt Vs=2000m/s

silt, clay,

Vs=300-450m/s fault,derived from H/V vibration measurements

conglomerate,Vs=800m/s

clay,gravel,Vs=450-600m/s

Page 28: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

28

Figure 14. H/V spectral ratio at site 99, which shows absence of site effect, and

comparison of the average H/V spectral ratios (red lines) with the analytical transfer

functions (black lines) for other sites along profile A.

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

203

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

81

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2

Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

86-well Hula1

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

57

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

69

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

202

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectral R

atio

49

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

52

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

95

10 208642Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

37

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

170 99

Page 29: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

29

Next part of the profile, from point 170 –to 52 shows wide range of the H/V ratios with

single peak of frequency (3-8 Hz) and high amplitudes from 5 to 8. Here the increase of

amplitudes level also reflects the change of the main reflector from conglomerate to basalt

(Vs=2000m/s). Our modeling shows that the low velocities of the first soft layer

(Vs=300m/s) provide the rapid change of the resonance frequencies but not the sharp change

of the reflector depth. For example, frequency changes from 3 Hz (point 95) to 7.2 Hz (point

52) on distance of 0.5 km only.

As we noted above, we observed spectral ratios on some of local zones of the basalt

outcropping, where the young and weathered basalt with Vs=900-1000m/s lies on the old

basalt lava (Vs=2000m/s). H/V functions show a single peak at 6-14 Hz with low amplitudes

(2-2.5) (Figures5, 6). Point 57 of profile A (Figure 13) is a characteristic example. It locates

on the Giv’at Shehumit and our model suggested 31m of the weathered basalt layer with

Vs=990m/s (see Figure 14).

The analysis of H/V spectra shows the faults between points 52-57 (Tel-Hay f.) and

68-69 (Shehumit f.). These faults were detected by the geological survey (Picard, 1952,

Glikson, 1966, Kafri, 1991, Ron, 1997, Zilberman, 2000) and concluded in GEOLOGICAL

MAP OF ISRAEL (METULLA) by Sneh and Weinberger in 2003. We also detected these

faults in the north and south of the study area, where the faults are concealed (Figures5, 6).

The H/V ratio with two peaks was observed at the point 69.The first resonance

frequency (4 Hz) is related to old basalt (reflector). Low seismic impedance between

weathered basalt (Vs=980m/s) and the upper layer of soil with Vs=450m/s creates the

second peak- 9 Hz with low amplitude.

The part of the profile (points 176–86) corresponds to zone of the increase of

sediment thicknesses. This zone is characterized by single H/V resonance peaks, changing

from 2.7 Hz to 0.7 Hz with amplitudes level of 3.5-5.The structure of this zone presents a

simple two-layer model, when the soft layer of alluvium which is of uniform composition

overlays basalt. Our models are confirmed by geological data from Hula-1 well (Figure 11,

13, 14), which penetrates the basalt flows from the depth 170 m. Clay (Vs=350-400m/s)

alternating with gravel (Vs=600m/sec) does not create additional seismic impedance, that

could be responsible for the second peak of frequency. We have to note that we also used

the data from depth section along reflection line GP-0170 (Frieslander and Medvedev,

2002) which is attached to Hula-1 and stretches in the west direction.

Page 30: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

30

7.2 Profile B

Profile B located in the western part of the study area (Figure 7), where “a complex of

slope movement material and three overlying lobes of rock and debris flow deposits were

identified” (A. Sneh and R.Weinberger, 2003). Our interpretation was performed using

modeling at all sites in the landslide zone. Cross-section along profile B is presented in the

Figure 15. H/V spectral ratios and corresponding analytical transfer functions at selected

sites along profile are shown in Figure 16. H/V ratios at sites are characterized by single

resonance frequencies, which changed in the wide range (2.6Hz-10Hz).

The important structural features of this profile are faults, derived from H/V

measurements and dividing the blocks with different reflectors and depth to the reflector.

Point 102 (Figures 15, 16) presents the southern and downdip block of the profile.

Point 102 is located near the QS well, which was mentioned above (Figure 10). According

to the borehole data, basalt is the main reflector in this block.

Next updip block is represented by point 181 (Figures 15, 16). H/V ratio has peak of

frequency at 8Hz with relatively high amplitude (a factor 5). According to GEOLOGICAL

MAP OF ISRAEL (METULLA) (A. Sneh and R. Weinberger, 2003), sandstone of

Barremian age or basalt Plio-Pleistocene age could be the main reflector. S-wave velocity

of sandstone, as a rule, significantly below (Vs=600-750m/s), than Vs of basalt, and

comparable with velocity of debris material. Assuming the basalt with Vs=2000m/s as

main reflector we obtained good agreement between observed H/V function and calculated

transfer function. Our models are confirmed by the data of the top Hasbani basalt from

reflection line GP-0170 (Frieslander and Medvedev, 2002), western end of which is located

200m away from the point 181.

We have detected faults bordering this block, by a sharp shift of resonance frequency.

These faults are striking in the W-E direction (also see Figure 17) in accordance with W-E

oriented faults mapped by A. Sneh and R. Weinberger (2003) to the west on the

Creataceous beds exposition (Figures 1, 7).

The part of the profile (points 17-4) is characterized by resonance frequencies at 2.5-3

Hz with relatively low amplitudes (see Figure 16). Limestone with Vs=1900m/s is the main

reflector for this block, as it follows from the geological data. Calculated depths to the

reflector are 65-70m.

Page 31: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

31

Figure 15. Schematic geological cross-section B constructed on the base of ambient

vibration data analysis.

Figure 16. Comparison of the average H/V spectral ratios (red lines) with the analytical

transfer functions (black lines) for sites along profile B.

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2

Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

102-well QS

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

181

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

17

1 102 4 6 8Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

29

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

247

1 102 4 6 80.80.60.40.2Frequency (Hz)

1

10

2

4

6

8

0.8

0.6

0.4

Sp

ectr

al R

ati

o

6

102 103181

18

17 15247 4

6 5 29

0

50

100

Dep

th

0 500 1000Distance, m

0

50

100

150QS

Q

irya

t

Sh

em

on

a f

.

SN

limestone &sanstoneconglomerateVs=800m/sec

fault derived from H/V measurements

debris of limestone,Vs=500-700m/sec

loam,debris of sandstone, Vs=350-450m/sec

Slope movement material:

limestone & dolomiteVs=1900m/sec

basaltVs=2000m/sec

Page 32: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

32

Points 6 -29 are located at the northern part of profile, corresponded to the Kiryat

Shemona graben where basalt is the main reflector. The small exposure of basalt exists to

the north of point 29 at the distance of 200m. In this block we observed increasing of

amplitude H/V ratios (a factor 4-5), possibly due to the loose sediments (Vs= 350-400m/s)

dominating in the slope movement materials along the foot of the Cretaceous beds

exposition (Figure 15).

We have detected fault between points 4 and 6, by a sharp change of H/V ratio

amplitudes. We have identified this fault as Kiryat Shemona fault, which is concealed in

the landslide zone.

7.3 Estimating the thickness of soft sediments.

Figure 17 shows a contour map of the sediment thickness, as inferred from the

analysis of ambient vibration measurements. The sediment thickness changes from 20m at

the north to 200m at the south of study area. We have obtained the data that allow us to

distinguish the areas that correspond to different reflectors: area marked by red color is the

area where basalt is the main reflector, by green color- limestone, by yellow color-

conglomerate. It should be noted that we have traced the northern border of the basalt flow

distribution. This was performed using H/V ratios with amplitude levels of less than 3.5.

The faults derived from analysis of ambient vibration measurement are also presented. We

have detected the parts of known faults covered by alluvium and slope movement material

(the Kiryat Shemona fault) within the area where the site response was obtained (Figure

17). As we see the vertical displacement along the Shehumit fault reached 40m at the south

part of the study area.

8. SEISMIC HAZARD MICROZONATION

In our studies we applied the SEEH procedure, developed by Shapira and van Eck (1993)

(SEEH- Stochastic Estimation of the Earthquake Hazard) to predict the site specific

acceleration response spectra computed for 10% probability of exceedence during an

exposure time of 50 years and for a damping ratio of 5%. The SEEH computations require

information on several seismological parameters such as spatial distribution of seismogenic

Page 33: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

33

zones and their seismicity characteristics, stress drop, Q-values, seismic moment – local

magnitude relationships, etc. Estimation of these parameters are based on seismological data

(local and regional earthquake) provided by the local seismic networks.

Figure 17. The schematic map of the sediment thickness, inferred from H/V spectral

ratio analyses also shows the faults in the Kiryat Shemona

790000

792000

794000

254000 256000

Fault derived from H/V

measurements

Page 34: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

34

The SEEH applies Monte Carlo simulation to simulate the seismicity in the different

seismogenic zones surrounding the investigated area over several thousands of years and

applies the stochastic method to synthesize ground motions for each of the simulated events.

At the final stage of the simulations, the synthetic horizontal accelerations propagate to the

surface of the site through the soil layers constituting the site’s sub-surface. The SEEH also

incorporates the uncertainties associated with almost every parameter needed in the

computations. The response function of the soil column of the site is calculated by using the

program SHAKE.

By comparison of the Uniform Hazard Acceleration Spectra calculated for 90 selected

sites in consideration of the constructed subsurface models across the study area we divided

the area into 8 zones (Figures 18, 19). Each zone is characterized by a generalized seismic

hazard function representative the site within that zone (Table 5), computed under the

assumption that the sediments are not susceptible to non-linear effects (black line).

The field observations of resent earthquakes using surface and downhole vertical array

of accelerometers indicated that nonlinear behavior of the soils have great seismic

engineering implications. In this study we used program of Joyner (1977) to calculate the

ground response in strong motion in various conditions of the stress-strain relation. The

physical properties of soil layers such as thickness, density and S-velocity were taken from

the linear models. Estimates of the dynamic shear strength for different soils were inferred

from the work of Hartzel et al (2004).The seismic acceleration spectrums allowing for non-

linear behavior of the soil are presented by blue lines (Table 5). As shown in Table 6, there

are significant differences when assuming linear and nonlinear soil behavior in all zones. The

uncertainty in the parameters we used for assessing the hazard while allowing nonlinear

effects is high. Consequently, our hazard assessments under nonlinear behavior of soil are

only of an illustrative character.

The design spectra required in the same area for ground conditions by the current Israel

Building Code 413 (IS-413) are also presented in Table 5.

It should be noted that the shape of the hazard functions (linear and nonlinear) differ

significantly from those prescribed by the IS-413 code in all zones. In the zone I hazard

assessment under nonlinear behavior of soil and the design spectra are comparable. In the

Kiryat Shemona area the Israel Building Code underestimates the expected accelerations in

different period ranges.

Page 35: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

35

Figure 18. Seismic microzonation map of the Kiryat Shemona.

Figure 19. Generalized 1D soil columns for each zone.

254000 256000

790000

792000

794000

I

IIIII

IV

VV

III

VI

VIII

VII

III

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

alluvium,Vs=300-450m/sec

clay,gravel Vs=450-600m/sec

slope movement material,Vs=500-700m/sec Limestone,Vs=1900m/sec

Basalt, Vs=2000m/sec

weathered basalt,Vs= 900-1000m/sec

I II III IV V VI VII VIII

conglomerate,Vs=750-900m/sec

Page 36: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

36

Table 5. Parameters of generalized 1D soil columns and acceleration spectrums.

Zone

1D soil column models for each zone Linear (black), Non Linear(blue)

Acceleration spectrums and

The Israel Building code IS-413 (red).

Thickness,

m

Density,

g/cm³

Vs,

m/s

Damping,

%

I

160 1.9 450 2

- 2.3 2000 -

II

95 1.9 450 3

- 2.3 2000 -

III 45 1.9 450 3

- 2.3 2000 -

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

Page 37: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

37

IV

23 1.9 450 3

- 2.3 2000 -

V

13 1.7 350 6

- 2.3 2000 -

VI

16 1.7 300 8

- 2.2 800 -

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

Page 38: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

38

VII

3 1.7 380 3

30 2.1 700 2

- 2.3 1900 -

VIII

10 1.7 500 6

16 2.1 960 2

- 2.3 1900 -

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

Period, [s]

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2

Sp

ectr

al

Accele

ra

tio

n, [g

]

Page 39: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

39

CONCLUSIONS

Site effect is very important in the evaluation of seismic hazard. Subsurface impedance

contrast can significantly amplify the shaking level, as well as increased duration of strong

ground motion. Site effect investigations were carried out at 300 sites in the Kiryat Shemona

area by using the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio of ambient noise. The horizontal-to-

horizontal spectral ratios of ambient noise recorded simultaneously at the investigated site

and the reference site also were used.

The analysis performed showed the following:

The most part of the measurement sites produced H/V spectral ratios with

single resonance peak, which indicate of uniform lithological section with

velocity characteristics of the sediments changing gradually. In the most part

of the study area the fundamental frequencies are associated with the basalt of

Plio-Pleistocene age which is the main reflector. At the north-west of study

area the carbonate and conglomerate are the main reflectors creating the site

response.

We observed distribution of the resonance frequencies in the range 0.7-14Hz

and their associated amplitude levels in the range 2-8. The frequency and its

amplitude maps were constructed. The fundamental frequencies correlate in

general with dipping of the basement (reflector).

H/V and H/H spectral ratios of ambient noise showed the consistent results.

However, since the source of ambient noise in urban areas varies significantly

from place to place, the H/H ratio technique can only be applied within a

limited area and within 200-400 m from a reference site.

We have developed S-wave velocities model for lithological units represented

in the Kiryat Shemona area using ambient noise measurements, surface

geology and refraction survey data and borehole data. The distribution of the

velocity of the soft upper layer throughout the study area was mapped.

Dense grid of measurements enabled estimating the depth to the main reflector

(within areas corresponding to different reflectors) and detected the northern

border of basalt flow distribution. On the basis of analysis H/V ratios two

schematic geological cross-section were constructed.

Page 40: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

40

We defined more accurately the known fault locations. Parts of the Kiryat

Shemona, the Tel- Hay and the Shehumit faults covered by alluvium and slope

movement material were defined. The main direction of faults is N-S, but we

have traced some new faults striking at W-E and NW-SE directions.

We had presented the seismic microzonation map of the Kiryat Shemona area

providing a realistic assessment of the site specific seismic hazard.

Generalized model is proposed for each zone. The characteristic acceleration

response spectra were computed using SEEH procedure on the bases of the

generalized subsurface models under assumption non-linear and linear

behavior of the sediments. Whereas non-linear hazard assessments had only an

illustrative character.

In all zones the shapes of the hazard functions differ significantly from those

prescribed by the IS-413 code.

Page 41: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

41

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Our grateful thanks to Dr. A. Hofstetter and to Dr. V. Pinsky have inspired us fruitful

discussion and constructive comments.

Page 42: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

42

REFERENCES

Amiran, D.H.K.; Arieh, E.; Turcotte, T. Earthquakes in Israel and Adjacent Areas:

Macroseismic Observations since 100 B.C.E. Israel Exploration Journal. 1994, 44, 261-

305.

Chavez-Garcia, F. J. and Cuenca, J. (1998). Site effects and microzonation in Acapulco.

Earthquake Spectra 14:1, 75-93.

Kagami, H., Duke C.M., Liang, G.C. and Ohta, Y. (1982). Observation of 1- to 5-second

microtremors and their application to earthquake engineering. Part II. Evaluation of site

effect upon seismic wave amplification deep soil deposits. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 72,

987-998.

Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using

microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research

30:1, 25-33.

Schnabel, P.B., Lysmer, J. and Seed, H.B. (1972). SHAKE – A computer program for response

analysis of horizontally layered sites. Report No. EERC 72-12, Univ. of California at

Berkeley.

Joyner, W. B., 1977. A Fortran program for calculating nonlinear seismic response, U. S.

Geological Survey, Open File Report 77-671.

Joyner, W. B., and Boore, D. M., 1981. Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-

motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California,

earthquake, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71: 2011-2038.

Mucciarelli M., Monachesi, G., 1998. A quick survey of local amplifications and their

correlation with damage observed during the Umbro-Marchesan (Italy) earthquake of

September 26, 1997. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 2, No 2: 325-337.

Mucciarelli M., 1998. Reliability and applicability of Nakamura’s technique using

microtremors: an experimental approach, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 4: 625-

638.

Seekins, L.C., Wennerberg, L., Margheriti, L. and Liu, H.-P. (1996). Site amplification at fife

locations in San Francisco, California: a comparison of S waves, codas and

microtremors. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 627-635.

Shapira, A. and van Eck, T. (1993). Synthetic uniform hazard site specific response spectrum.

Natural Hazard 8, 201-205.

Page 43: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

43

Shapira, A., and A. Hofstetter, 1993. Source parameters and scaling relationship of earthquakes

in Israel, Teconophysics: 217-226.

Shapira, A. and Avirav, V. (1995). PS-SDA Operation Manual, IPRG report Z1/567/79, 24pp.

Sneh A., 1998. The Dead Sea Rift: Lateral displacement and downfaulting phases,

Tectonophysics, 263: pp 277-292.

Ezersky M., 1999. Seismic borehole studies at the Kiryat Shemona, Beit Shean and Hagoshrim

sites, GII Report No.803/35/99.

Ezersky, M. and Shtivelman, V., 1999. Seismic refraction surveys for updating the

microzonation map of Israel, GII Report No. 802/43/99.

Horike, M., Zhao, B., and Kawase, H., 2001. Comparison of site response characteristics

inferred from microtremors and earthquake shear wave, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91;

1526-1536.

Sneh, A. and Weinberger, R. (2003). Geology of the Metulla quadrangle, northern Israel:

Implications for the offset along the Dead Sea Rift. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 52, 123-138.

Zaslavsky, Y., Shapira, A. and Arzi, A.A. (2000). Amplification effects from earthquakes and

ambient noise in Dead Sea Rift (Israel). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

20/1:4, 187-207.

Zaslavsky, Y., Shapira, A. and Leonov, J. (2003). Empirical evaluation of site effects by means

of H/V spectral ratios at the locations of strong motion accelerometers in Israel, Journal

of Earthquake Engineering 7:4, 655-677.

Shamir, G., Bartov, Y., Sneh, A., Fleischer, L., Arad., A., Rosenshaft, M, 2001. Preliminary

seismic Zonation in Israel, GSI Report No.GSI12/01, GII Report No. 550/95/01(1), pp

10.

Parolai, S., Bormann, P. and Milkereit, C., 2002. New relationship between VS, thickness of

sediments, and resonance frequency calculated by the H/V ratio of seismic noise for the

Cologne area (Germany), Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92 (6), 2521-2527.

Pavlenko, O. and Irikura, K., 2002: Changes in shear moduli of liquefied and nonliquefied

soils during the 1995 Kobe earthquake and its aftershocks at three vertical-array sites.

Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92: 1952-1969.

Perelman, N., and Zaslavsky, Y., 2001. Analysis of seismic signals in frequency domain,

(SEISPECT), GII Report, 569/345/01, 41pp.

Parolai, S., and Galiano-Merino, J.J., 2006. Effect of transient seismic noise on estimates on

H/V spectral ratios, Bull. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 96, 228-236.

Page 44: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

44

Zaslavsky, Y., Gorstein, M., Giller, V., Livshits, I., Giller, D., Dan, I., Shapira, A., Leonov, J.,

and Peled, U., 2001. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Seismic

microzoning of Lod and Ramla. GII Report 569/143/01.

Zaslavsky, Y., Shapira, A., and Arzi, A. A., 2002. Earthquake site response on hard rock –

empirical study, Proceeding of 5th International Conference on analysis of

Discontinuous Deformation, ICADD, 6-10 October 2002, Beer-Sheva, Israel 133-144.

Zaslavsky, Y., (Principal Investigator), Shapira, A., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Perelman,

N., Giller, V., Livshits, I., Giller, D., Dan I., Aksinenko, T., Ataeva G., Shvartsburg, A.,

2002. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 2: Site effects in and

around Kiryat Shemona, GII Report No 569/252/02.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Shapira, A., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Aksinenko,

T., Ataev, G., Giller, D, Dan I., Giller, V., Livshits, L., Perelman N., and Shvartsburg,

A., 2003. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 3: Empirical

determination of site- effects for the assessment of earthquake hazard and risk to Kefar

Sava. GII Report No 569/345/03.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Hofstetter, A., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Ataeva

G., Aksinenko, T., Giller, D, Dan I., Giller, V., Livshits, I., Perelman N. and

Shvartsburg, A., 2004. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 4:

Empirical determination of site-effect for the assessment of earthquake hazard and risk

to Dimona and Arad, GII Report No 569/076/04.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Ataeva G., Gorstein, M., Hofstetter, A., Kalmanovich,

M., Giller, D, Dan I., Perelman N., Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., Livshits, I., and

Shvartsburg, A., 2005. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 5:

Empirical determination of site-effect for the assessment of earthquake hazard and risk

to Beit Shean and Afula, GII Report No 569/175/05.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Ataeva G., Gorstein, M., Hofstetter, A., Kalmanovich,

M., Giller, D, Dan I., Perelman N., Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., Livshits, I., and

Shvartsburg, A., 2006. Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 6: Site-

effect and seismic hazard assessment for Petah Tikva, Hod haSharon and Rosh haAyin

towns. GII Report No 569/237/06.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Gorstein, M., Ataeva G., Kalmanovich, M., Perelman

N., Giller, D, Dan I., Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., Livshits, I., and Shvartsburg, A., 2007.

Microzoning of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 7: Empirical determination of

Page 45: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

45

site-effects for the assessment of earthquake hazard and risk to the Southern Sharon and

Lod valley areas. GII Report No 569/303/07.

Hofstetter, A. (Principal Investigator), Ataeva G., Aksinenko, T., Dr. Y. Zaslavsky, Gorstein,

M., Kalmanovich, M., Giller, D, Dan I., Perelman N., Giller, V., Livshits, I., and

Shvartsburg, A., 2008. Exploration of Sedimentary Layers and Reconstruction of

Subsurface Structure by Ambient Vibration measurements for Microzoning of the Afek

Area. GII Report No 508/388/08.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Aksinenko, T., Ataeva G., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich,

M., Giller, D, Dan I., Perelman N., Giller, V., Livshits, I., and Shvartsburg, A., 2008.

Empirical Determination of Site Effects for Seismic Hazard Assessment in Kishon

Graben area near Carmel Fault. GII Report No 510/389/08.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Kalmanovich, M., Dr. M. Ezersky, Gorstein, M.,

Perelman N., Dan I., Giller, V., Ataeva G., Aksinenko, T., Giller, D, and Shvartsburg,

A., 2008. Site effects from ambient noise measurements and seismic hazard assessment

in Nothern Tel Aviv. GII Report No 519/401/08.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Dan I., Perelman N.,

Giller, D, Ataeva G., Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., and Shvartsburg, A., 2009. Microzoning

of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 8: Site effect and seismic hazard

microzonation across the town of Tiberias. GII Report No 502/416/09.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., Shvartsburg, A., Gorstein, M.,

Ataeva G., Kalmanovich, M., Perelman N., Giller, D and Dan I., 2009. Site Effects in

the town of Akko: Implications for Seismic Hazard Assessment. GII Report No

552/471/09.

Zaslavsky, Y. (Principal Investigator), Ataeva G., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Perelman

N., Giller, V., Shvartsburg, A., Giller, D., Dan I. and Aksinenko, T., 2009. Microzoning

of the earthquake hazard in Israel. Project 9: Site specific earthquake hazards

assessment using ambient noise measurements in Hadera, Pardes Hana, Benyamina and

neighboring settlements. GII Report No 526/473/09.

'' מס בינייםי "מג ח "דו שמונה -תקירי באזור גבוהה בהפרדה רפלקציה סקר. מדבדייב. פריזלנדר וב. ר א"ד

398/243/02

ח "דו. רית שמונהמחקרי תגובת אתרים וספקטרום תגובה בק. 1994, .י, גיטרמן, .י, זסלבסקי, .א, שפירא

.D12/527/93(2)י מסכם מסי "מג

Page 46: AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE AND

46

Zaslavsky, Y., Ataev, G., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Perelman, and Shapira, A., 2008.

Assessment of site specific earthquake hazard in urban areas – Case study: The town of

Afula, Israel, and neighboring settlements, Bollettino di Geofisica, teorica and applicata

Vol. 49, N. 1, 93-108.

Zaslavsky, Y., Ataev, G., Gorstein, M., Kalmanovich, M., Hofstetter, A., Perelman, N.,

Aksinenko, T., Giller, V., Dan H., Giller, D., Livshits I., Shvartsburg , A., and Shapira

A., 2008. Microzoning of site response parameters in the towns of Dimona and Bet

Shean (Israel), Bollettino di Geofisica, teorica and applicata Vol. 49, N. 1, 109-130.

Y. Zaslavsky, A. Shapira, G. Ataev, M. Gorstein, T. Aksinenko, M. Kalmanovich, N.

Perelman, and R. Hofstetter, 2009. Using Ambient Noise Measurements in the Process

of Assessing Earthquake Hazards in Urban Areas: Examples from Israel, Authors /

Editors: T. Miura and Y. Ikeda, Earthquake Engineering: New research, Nova

Publisher.