alex smith – university of minnesota determination of |v cb | using moments of inclusive b decay...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
217 views
TRANSCRIPT
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Determination of |Determination of |VVcbcb| Using Moments of Inclusive B | Using Moments of Inclusive B
Decay SpectraDecay Spectra
BEACH04 ConferenceJune 28-July 3, 2004
Chicago, IL
Alex Smith
University of Minnesota
Introduction Hadron Mass Moments in BXcl Lepton Energy Moments in BXcl Photon Energy Moments in BXs decays
Combined Fit to Determine |Vcb| and HQET parameters
Summary
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Measuring |VMeasuring |Vcbcb||
• |Vcb| is a fundamental parameter of the Standard Model
• Inclusive semileptonic bc transitions provide a good laboratory in which to measure |Vcb| – Exclusive semileptonic modes suffer large theoretical uncertainties– Purely hadronic final states too complicated– Weak bcl process still obscured by strong interactions
• Strong interactions of inclusive semileptonic decays described by– Perturbative QCD
• Short-distance effects
– Heavy Quark Effective Theory/Operator Product Expansion• Non-perturbative long-distance effects
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Heavy Quark Effective TheoryHeavy Quark Effective Theory
• Semileptonic rate expressed as a double expansion in s and 1/mb
– Use “kinetic mass” formulation of Uraltsev, et al (hep-ph/0401063)
33223
252
,,,,,,,1192 LSDGcbm
ms
cbbF mmNPVmG
cbc
b
couplingorbit -Spin :
TermDarwin : /1
)( splitting Hyperfine :
)(quark of momentum Fermi : /1
)( massquark : /1
massquark :
3
33
22
122
LS
Db
G
b
bb
c
mO
bmO
bmmO
cm
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Moments of Observable SpectraMoments of Observable Spectra
• Moment of distribution defined in usual way:
• A commom set of HQET parameters appear in expressions for– Lepton energy moments in BXcl– Hadronic mass-squared moments in BXcl– q2 moments in BXcl– Photon energy moments in BXs– Semileptonic width
• Simultaneously fit these measurements to determine HQET parameters
cut
cut
E
E
n
cutn
dEdE
d
dEdE
dE
EE
)(eg., lepton energy moment:
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
The CLEO II DetectorThe CLEO II Detector
• CESR symmetric e+e- collider– Energy near (4S)
• Most relevant features of detector:– Hermeticity of detector
neutrino reconstruction– Excellent shower
resolution of CsI calorimeter photons, electrons
– Good charged particle resolution and dE/dx of drift chamber leptons
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Hadronic Mass and Hadronic Mass and qq22 Moments in Moments in BBXXccll
Infer hadronicmass
Reconstructneutrino
Identifylepton
B
X W
l
Wl
qMX
El
E
UnknownSmall
beam222 cos22 BBBX pppEEEqMM
• Neutrino reconstruction technique
hep-ex/0403052
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Hadronic Mass and Hadronic Mass and qq22 Moments in Moments in BBXXccll
Infer hadronicmass
Reconstructneutrino
Identifylepton
B
X W
l
Wl
qMX
El
E
UnknownSmall
beam222 cos22 BBBX pppEEEqMM
• Neutrino reconstruction technique
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Hadronic Mass and Hadronic Mass and qq22 Moments in Moments in BBXXccll
• Selection criteria applied to suppress continuum and enhance neutrino reconstruction
• Fit differential decay rate in three dimensions:– q2
– MX2
– cosWl
• Fit Components and models:– BDl HQET+measured FF’s– BD*lHQET+measured FF’s– BD**lISGW2– B(Xc)non-reslGoity-Roberts– BXulISGW2+NR– Secondary leptons CLEO MC– Continuum and fakes data
Note: histogramsnormalized to same area
Fit Components
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Hadronic Mass and Hadronic Mass and qq22 Moments in Moments in BBXXccll
• Fit projections– Fit provides reasonable
description of the data
• Branching fractions of individual modes are very model-dependent
• Inclusive differential decay rate much less model-dependent
q2 MX2
cosWl |pl|
E
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Hadronic Mass and Hadronic Mass and qq22 Moments in Moments in BBXXccll
• Results are consistent with previous CLEO measurements
• Uncertainties and results comparable to BaBar measurements
• q2 moments expected to be somewhat complementary to MX moments– Only measured by CLEO
hep-ex/0403052
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Lepton Energy Moments in Lepton Energy Moments in BBXXccll
• Di-lepton event sample• Use one lepton as the “tag”:
– pl > 1.4 GeV/c, e or – ~97% of sample is primary
BXl– Lepton charge tags flavor of
parent B meson
• Look for signal electron in “tagged” events– pe > 0.6 GeV/c– Correct for backgrounds and
efficiencies– Use charge and kinematic
correlations to separate the spectra from primary and secondary leptons
• Primary leptons are the signal
Monte Carlo simulation of electron daughters from B decay
hep-ex/0403053
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Lepton Energy Moments in Lepton Energy Moments in BBXXccll
Unmixed B0 Mixed B0
Primary EventsOpposite B SecondariesSame B Secondaries
ebb ecbb
ecb
ebb ecbb
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Lepton Energy Moments in Lepton Energy Moments in BBXXccll
Unmixed B0 Mixed B0
Primary EventsOpposite B SecondariesSame B Secondaries
ebb ecbb
ecb
ebb ecbb
Easily vetoed with kinematic cut
X25 rejection66% efficient
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Lepton Energy Moments in Lepton Energy Moments in BBXXccll
• Subtract backgrounds• Correct for efficiencies• Algebraically solve for
primary spectrum
1
1
b opp
b sameb opp
dp
cdB
dp
bdB
dp
edN
dp
cdB
dp
cdB
dp
bdB
dp
edN
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Lepton Energy Moments in Lepton Energy Moments in BBXXccll
• Correct for – EW radiation– B boost
• Results consistent with previous CLEO measurements• Systematics-limited--- Uncertainty on moments comparable to BaBar• Integrate measured spectrum
%24.009.091.10 XeBBR
hep-ex/0403053
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Photon Energy Moments in Photon Energy Moments in BBXXss
• Large photon background from continuum processes– 0 and veto– Suppress using neural network
• Several different inputs related to event shape
– Pseudo-reconstruction• Ks
0 or K+/-
• 1-4 pions, at most one 0
– Large subtraction necessary
222 GeV 0020.00066.00226.0
GeV 011.0032.0346.2
EE
Ehep-ex/0108032
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Photon Energy Moments in Photon Energy Moments in BBXXss
• bs measurement is key to extracting HQET parameters– Sensitive to mb
• Mean energy (1st moment) roughly equal to mb/2
– Independent of mc
• New analysis in progress– Previous analysis optimized for branching fraction
measurement– New analysis of old data optimized for extraction of
spectrum– New results soon
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
• Measurements included in fit: – 1st and 2nd photon energy moments : E > 2.0 GeV
– 1st and 2nd lepton energy moments : Ee > 0.7, 1.2, 1.5 GeV
– 1st and 2nd hadronic mass moments : Ee > 1.0, 1.5 GeV
– 1st q2 moment : Ee > 1.0, 1.5 GeV
• Chi-squared fit including full correlation matrix of measurements
• Uses O(1/m3) formulation and code from Uraltsev and Gambino (hep-ph/0401063)
– Includes perturbative corrections to account for lepton/photon energy cuts
• Will also use approach of Bauer, Ligeti, et al before finalizing results (hep-ph/0210027)
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(GeV
2 )
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
1st and 2nd LeptonEnergy Moments
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(GeV
2 )
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
1st and 2nd PhotonEnergy Moments
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(GeV
2 )
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
1st and 2nd HadronicMass Moments
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(GeV
2 )
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
1st q2 Moments
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(GeV
2 )
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
• Only CLEO has measured photon energy, q2, hadronic mass, and lepton energy in a single experiment– A solution consistent with all measurements is found
– Without BXs mb and mc almost completely correlated in fit
– Most of the sensitivity to mb comes from BXs measurement
• First moment mean photon energy mb/2 (approx.)
• Other measurements primarily constrain mb-Cmc, C~0.6
– q2 moment gives some complementary information• Nearly independent of
2
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
CLEO data
(GeV/c2)
(Ge
V/c
2)
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
1st Lepton EnergyMoment
2nd Lepton EnergyMoment
1st Photon EnergyMoment
2nd Photon EnergyMoment
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
2nd Hadronic MassMoment
1st Hadronic MassMoment
1st q2 Moment
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
measurement key
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
Combined Fit to Determine |VCombined Fit to Determine |Vcbcb||
• Measurement of |Vcb| and HQET parameters, including mb(), mc(),
() at =1 GeV
• Expect to reduce experimental errors significantly with additional measurements
• Theory errors under study and not shown or included in fit– Expected to be >= experimental
errors33
3026.0029.0
3
2083.0081.0
2
2050.0054.0
2
210.011.0
2073.0074.0
GeV 17.005.0
GeV 091.0~GeV 10.0
GeV 483.0
GeV/ 16.1
GeV/ 564.4
LS
D
G
c
b
cm
cm
3108.04.42 cbV
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota
SummarySummary• Potential to significantly improve measurement of |Vcb|
– Experimental errors expected to be less than 2%– Theoretical errors expected to be comparable to experimental errors– Theoretical models will benefit from experimental constraints on higher
order parameters
• Many improvements to analysis in progress:– 3rd lepton energy moments– work in progress– Include more 1st and 2nd lepton energy moment measurements in fit– 2nd q2 moments – should have corrections soon
• Complementary sensitivity to parameters
– Improved BXs moments – soon• Critical constraint on mb
– Include theoretical uncertainties in fit– almost ready
• CLEO has measured several different moments in a single experiment– Complementary to and of comparable precision to public BaBar
measurements