aig + partners · rohan shiram energy & sustainability director centrica business solutions 2...
TRANSCRIPT
Centrica Business Solutions 1
AIG + PartnersSustainability in the Built Environment
Rohan ShiramEnergy & Sustainability Director
Centrica Business Solutions 2
1.Decarbonisation: The War on carbon
2.New Draft London Plan and its implications
3.BREEAM Updates: 2014 vs 2018
Agenda
Centrica Business Solutions 3
About us
Assessment
Sustainability statements
Home Quality Mark
BREEAM
LEED
Analysis
Energy strategies
LZC feasibility studies
Thermal Bridging
Condensation Risk
Thermal Comfort
HVAC Loads
Air Tightness Testing
Daylight analysis
Thermal Modelling Sustainable Design Advise Energy Statement Reports Sustainability Statement
Overheating and Ventilation BREEAM Assessments SAP, SBEM & EPCs Daylight Analysis
Centrica Business Solutions 4
DECARBONISATION: The War on Carbon
What are the implications for 2019?…… and beyond……
Project Fantasy The Realities…..VS
What is Decarbonisation?
6
• The reduction or removal ofcarbon dioxide emissions fromenergy sources.
Why the urge?• The Paris Agreement, which the
UK Government has signed-up to,commits to:
• Mandatory greenhouse gasemission targets set in the UKClimate Change Act, whichrequires emissions to be cut by80% by 2050 compared to 1990levels.
• “ To limit the increase in theglobal average temperatures towell below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuingefforts to limit the temperatureincrease to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing thatthis would significantly reducethe risks and impacts of climatechange”
Climate change: How 1.5C degrees of global warming could change the world
• Pushing the Committee onClimate Change to recommendmore stringent carbon reductiontargets for all constructionsectors.
Centrica Business Solutions
Fuel Prices and CO2 FactorsThe implications of adopting SAP 10
Grid Electricity is decarbonised by 55% compared to SAP2012
There are two main implications-• The first is that the carbon emissions
from electric heating will now reflect the current reality, instead of being many years out of date.
• The second is that technologies generating electricity, such as gas-engine CHP and PV, will only be credited with reducing carbon by the amount of current grid carbon electricity, instead of the historic figure used in SAP 2012.
8
London Plan Target – Comparison MatrixSAP2012 (carbon factor of 519gCO2 /kWh for electricity). SAP10 (carbon factor of 233gCO2 /kWh for electricity).
9
Investment Costs VS Carbon Emissions
Centrica Business Solutions 10
Updates to the draft New London PlanPublished | July 2019
11
DRAFT LONDON PLAN KEY FIGURES – PLANNING PERSPECTIVE
12
CURRENT LONDON PLAN POLICY – ENERGY TARGETSEnergy strategies for development in London are guided by the current version of Chapter 5 of the London Plan and the relevant policies contained within:
13
DRAFT LONDON PLAN POLICY – ENERGY TARGETS The draft plan replaces the policies previously contained within Chapter 5 with Chapter 9 – Sustainable Infrastructure.
14
The overall policy target relating to carbon emissions remains a 35% on-site reduction beyond Part L 2013 standards, with zero carbon offset through a cash-in-lieu contribution (or verifiable offsite measures).
There are however a number of changes:
• ‘Be Lean’ target - raised from Part L compliance, to a residential target of 10% improvement through demand reduction and energy efficiency measures and 15% for non-residential (to be reviewed subject to Part L amendments).
• New fourth tier – ‘Be Seen’. This requires annual monitoring and reporting of post-construction energy demand and carbon emissions for a period of at least 5 years.
• An acknowledgement on operational emissions - showing a declining proportion of overall emissions, and a whole life-cycle approach to capture: o Unregulated emissions (cooking and appliances).
• Embodied emissions – raw material extraction, manufacture, transport and construction. o Maintenance and material disposal.
DRAFT LONDON PLAN POLICY – ENERGY TARGETS
15
• All referable applications will be required to undertake whole life-cycle carbon emission assessments, with major non-referable development required to calculate unregulated emissions as a minimum.
• Carbon offset payment is proposed to increase from £60/tonne for 30 years to £95/tonne (although with boroughs still able to set their own payment levels).
• Energy strategies are required to include additional details including: o Plan for monitoring and reporting of energy demand and CO2 emissions for at least 5 years post-
construction. o Proposals to address air quality risks.o A strategy for achieving zero carbon on-site by 2050. o Analysis of costs to occupants of energy strategy
• Grid-sourced electricity Carbon factors - , reduced from 0.519kgCO2/kWh to 0.233kgCO2/kWh. This has two key effects:
o Reduces emissions from electric heating systems – direct electric and heat pumps Reduces benefit of onsite electricity generation – solar PV and CHP
DRAFT LONDON PLAN POLICY – ENERGY TARGETS
• Your in-house planning and Energy/Sustainability experts
• Advise on Local, Regional and National Planning Policy requirements and S106 agreements
• Good working relationships with most London Borough and GLA planning and Energy officers
• We guide you on discharging prescriptive and informative planning conditions and advise on any risks of non-compliances.
How can we help?
Centrica Business Solutions 18
BREEAM NEW CONSTRUCTION 2018
SO WHATS NEW?
THE END OF BREEAM 2014
• 23 March 2018 - BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 scheme will close for registrations.
BREEAM 2018
• The launch date of the BREEAM UK New Construction 2018 scheme was 7 March 2018
• A key part of the update process is reviewing all current technical requirements of the scheme from:– delivering value to stakeholders– Reflecting the latest industry developments– Best practice standards– Regulation & policy
A comparison of BREEAM New Construction 2014 and 2018: What this means for your project
This document summarises the key changes that have been made within the latest
iteration, whilst providing a concise comparison with the 2014 scheme. The following pages
also identify where we anticipate additional time and cost implications that may arise from
the new scheme.
Please do get in touch should you wish to discuss any of the items in this document.
Key
Please note the scale of change, and resource / cost implications have been estimated as
follows:
Scale of change
Resource Cost impact
Minimal change /impact
Moderate change / impact
Significant change /impact
❖
❖❖
❖❖❖
£
££
£££
POST OCCUPANCY STAGE CERTIFICATE
• This new voluntary stage isadded in addition to theexisting Design Stage andPost-Construction Stage, with7 credits available in Energyand Water categories. (six inEnergy and one in Water)
• This additional stage cangather valuable data aboutthe performance gap to helpinfluence buildingperformance in the future.
• Able to assess the notion thata buildings often far exceedthe energy demands ascalculated during design.
CHANGE 1 – MAN 03 RESPONSIBLE CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES
• ConsiderateConstructor’s Schemereplaced with checklist of19 requirements creditavailable
• A CCS monitor report isacceptable as evidence tosupport the awarding ofsome criteria.
• Performance targets inthis section must now beformally agreed betweenthe client and contractor
Management
M AN
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
chang
e
Resour
ce
impact
Cost
impa
ct
MAN 01 Project brief and
design
Second credit for stakeholder consultation now requires a
design team workshop to be carried out with focus on Ene
01.
❖
Sustainability Champion credits, now BREEAM AP (Advisory
Professional) role more involved and focused, separate
appointment required from BREEAM Assessor role.
❖ £
MAN 02 Life cycle cost
and service life
planning
Only minor alterations to wording, no significantchange.
MAN 03 Responsible
construction
practices
Any contractor now managing the site, must have an ISO 14001
certified EMS (e.g. demolition contractor)
❖❖❖
BREEAM AP role more involved, and additional visits to site will
be required (separate from BREEAM Assessor role).
❖ £
At present, the Considerate Constructors Scheme has been
removed from the criteria. More detail will be provided on this in a
BRE guidance note to be released at the end of March 2018.
In replacement of the CCS scheme, requirement to complete a
responsible construction checklist: covering risk evaluation and
implementation, training, awareness, monitoring and reporting.
❖❖❖
Targets must now be set for the amount of consumption of
energy, water and transportation during construction, in addition to
monitoring.
❖
MAN 04 Commissioning
and handover
Minor changes to wording. New requirement to provide ‘technical
manual’as well as non-technical building user guide.
❖
MAN 05 Aftercare Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) credit, now requires commitment
of funds to carry out POE.
❖ £
CHANGE 2 – HEA 01 VISUAL COMFORT
• Glare control now requires aglare control assessment todemonstrate areas where glarewill, and will not be an issue
• Where compliant shadingmeasures are specified for allrelevant building areasregardless of the risk of glare, aglare control assessment will notbe necessary
CHANGE 3 – HEA 02 INDOOR AR QUALITY
• Credits in this section can no longer be claimed until an Indoor Air Quality plan has been created.
• Previous focus in this section on Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emission levels of paint has been expanded to consider the impact on air quality from other building materials including wood, plaster and insulation.
• A further credit is available if real-life air quality is measured and passes following construction.
Health and Wellbeing
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
chang
e
Resour
ce
impact
Cost
impa
ct
The update has ensured that relevant BREEAM criteria align more closely with the WELL standard.
HEA 01 Control of glare
from sunlight
The ‘glare control’ credit has been adapted, and requires a
glare control assessment to be carried out to fully justify
where areas are at risk of glare.
❖❖❖ £ ££
View out View out criteria extended to 8m room depth over 95% of
floor area. Credit now more achievable.
❖
HEA 02 Indoor air quality
(IAQ) plan
Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) plan is now a pre-requisite for this credit
issue.
❖❖❖ ££
Ventilation More options to demonstrate compliance with ventilation
requirements, and intakes must be 10m distance horizontally
from extract / source ofpollution.
❖
Natural ventilation Credit removed – criteria related to the potential for natural
ventilation is now included within WST 06 (design for
disassembly and adaptability), reviewedas an ‘adaptability
issue’. Removed due to city centre locations not wanting
openable windows as it would reduce air quality for the building.
Emissions from
construction
products
(previously VOC
credit)
Now two credits available for this credit issue based on
the number of products that comply.
This criteria VOC requirement and emission levels updated to
align with the required WELL standards.
Paints and coatings must comply with TVOC content limits.
❖❖
Post-construction
indoor air quality
measurement
Replaces the VOC testing credit. Similar approach, but
with new TVOC benchmarks for VOC testing.
❖
HEA
CHANGE 4 - HEA 07 SAFE AND HEALTHY SURROUNDINGS
• 2 credits are available in the new HEA07 section for providing occupants with safe access, dedicated cycle paths and storage, safe footpaths between buildings, vehicle drop off points and an outside amenity area
Health and Wellbeing
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
chan
ge
Resour
ce
impact
Cost
imp
act
HEA 03 Safe
containment
in
laboratories
Credit issue removed – now addressed within IAQ plan (Hea
02).
HEA 04 Thermal comfort No significant changes tocriteria.
However, thermal comfort criteria now requires the use
of new CIBSE 2016 weather files.
❖ £
HEA 05 Acoustic
performance
No significant changes tocriteria.
All buildings now have three credits available, other than
multi-residential.
❖
HEA 06 Security Safe access credit removed.
Only security credit considered now – minor clarification in
wording and SQSS definition updated.
Exemplary level credit now available.
❖❖
HEA 07
NEWCredit
Safe and
healthy
surroundin
gs
Safe movement around site (1 credit) replaces the 'safe
access' requirement previously addressed in Hea 06.
❖
Provision of outside space (1 credit) is now included to
ensure suitablyspace provided to facilitate activities that
can have physical, mental and social benefits for
occupants.
❖❖❖
HEA
CHANGE 5 - ENE 01 REDUCTION OF ENERGY USE AND CARBON EMISSIONS
• Most of the new Post Occupancy Stage credits are available in this section. This requires an assessor to be appointed and to report on the actual energy consumption compared with the targets set
• Credits available for how well the building was designed to limit energy use have been reduced to 9 at Design Stage.
• If the developer undertakes additional energy modelling during the Design and Post-Construction Stages, sets targets and reports on their progress, there are 4 credits available.
Energy
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
chang
e
Resourc
e
impact
Cost
impa
ct
ENE 01
NEWCredit
NEWCredit
Reduction of energy
use and carbon
emissions: energy
performance
The number of available credits for the energy performance criteria
have been reduced from 12 to 9. The criteria for this section of Ene
01 is similar to 2014 and based on the BRUKL model, but with more
onerous benchmarks.
The benchmarks are based on the Energy Performance Ratio for
New Construction (EPRNC) and a comparison between the credits
awarded for the 2014 scheme and new 2018 scheme are outlined
below:
❖ £
EPRNC for 2018
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
2014 credits achieved
3
5
7
10
12
2018 credits achieved
2
3
5
7
9
Prediction of
operational energy
consumption
Prediction of operational energy consumption: new credits are
availablefor undertaking additional energy modelling to generate
predicted operational energy consumption figures. A workshop
must be held to discuss this.
❖❖❖ ££
Exemplary level credits Two additional exemplary level credits available if there is a
commitment to carry out a post occupancy stage energy analysis –
this will require all Ene 02 credits to be achieved and a commitment
to pay for the analysis required at PCR stage, with appointment of
energy assessorconfirmed.
❖❖❖ £ ££
Mandatory
requirements
The mandatory requirements are now as follows:
• Excellent rating: at least 4 credits for energy performance
• Outstanding rating: at least 6 credits for energy performance, AND
4credits for energy modelling and reporting.
ENE
CHANGE 6 - TRA 01 & TRA 02
• The Travel section has completely changed with emphasis on how developers and contractors can improve access to local amenities and transport links as part of the building works.
Transport
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impac
t
TRA 01
NEW
Method
Transport
assessment and
travel plan
Transport category has been significantly restructured.
Two credits now available for carrying out a Travel Plan for Tra 01. This must
include calculation of the existing Accessibility Index (AI) for the development
and a strategy to increase or improve sustainable modes of transport, as
outlined in Tra 02.
❖❖❖ £
TRA 02
NEW
Credit
Sustainable
transport measures
Credit issue has 10 credits available -based on the number of pointsachieved
for improved sustainable transport measures - including electric car charging
points, new bus services, cycle storage,etc.
Credits are awarded based on the improvement of the AI whencompared to
the AI calculated for the existing site.
❖❖❖ £ ££
TRA 03 Credit issue removed.
TRA 04 Credit issue removed.
TRA 05 Credit issue removed.
TRA
CHANGE 7 - MAT 01 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS - BUILDING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
• LARGE SCALE CHANGES.
• The option of gaining points by following the Green Guide Rating has been dropped.
• Developers can choose to follow BRE’s Life Cycle Assessment tool, or go with Impact – a more enhanced calculation approach.
Materials
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impac
t
MAT 01
NEW
method
Environmental impacts
from construction
products – Building life
cycle assessment (LCA)
Seven credits and three exemplary level credits now available. This credit will
now look at the life cycle of the building as a whole, rather than an elemental
approach. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) must be carried out at key design
stages to demonstrate that the specification of material build-ups and their
impact have been considered.
A small number of credits will be available where a simplified LCA tool is
completed. More credits will be available where a more detailed BREEAM
compliant LCA tool is used. This second option will come as an additional cost.
❖❖❖ £ ££
MAT 02
NEW
Credit
Environmental impacts
from construction
products – Environmental
Product Declarations
(EPD)
Credits will be awarded based on the specification of products that have an
EPD. Points will be scored for each valid BS EN 15804 or ISO 21930 product is
specified.
❖❖ ££
MAT 03 Responsible sourcing of
construction products
Criteria have either stayed the same, or have been simplified. It may be
possible to score more credits under Mat 03 for BREEAM 2018 than
for BREEAM 2014.
❖
MAT 04 Insulation Credit issue removed -insulation will now be covered under the Mat 01 credit
issue.
MAT 05 Designing for
durability and
resilience
Criteria have been refined – requirements are nowmore detailed regarding
material degradation.❖
MAT 06 Material efficiency Criteria have been refined – examples of material efficiencies must now be
provided at each work stage.❖
M AT
CHANGE 8 - WST 05 ADAPTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
• A systematic risk assessment to identify the impact of expected extreme weather conditions arising from climate change on the building over its projected life cycle
• Previously focused on building material and structure only.
• Section expanded to include building services and renewable installations
Waste
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impac
t
WST 01
EXTRA
Credit
Construction site
waste management
Pre-demolition audit is now worth one credit and requirements are now more
onerous.❖ £
No significant changes to other requirements – waste benchmarks
were reviewed, but kept the same as 2014.
WST 02 Use of recycled
and sustainably
sourced
aggregates
Less emphasis on specifically recycled or secondary aggregate, now consider
aggregate use, type, location, and distance travelled.❖
WST 03 Operational waste The only significant change is that multi-residential developments
with communal facilities must now provide compostable waste
storage.
❖ £
WST 04 Speculative finishes No significant changes tocriteria.
WST 05 Adaptation to
climate change
No significant change – refined criteria to make requirements clearer and
includes building services within scope.
WST 06
EXTRA
Credit
Design for
disassembly and
adaptability
Two credits now available, with criteria from 2014 ‘functional adaptability’
credit split into two stages:
• The first requires a study to be carried out to explore the ease
of disassembly and the potential for functional adaptation.
• The second credit requires the recommendations of the study above
to have been implemented.
❖ £
W ST
CHANGE 10 – Land Use and Ecology
• Benchmarks for NOx have been revised. All emissions benchmarks are percentage improvements on EU legislative minimums
• This section has been made broader to cover particle pollution from biomass and solid fuel systems in addition to NOx emissions.
• Two credits are available by using low emission appliances to provide heat and hot water in the buildings.
Land Use andEcology
RefCredit
Key change Scale of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impact
The land use and ecology section has had a significant update following a lengthy consultation with a number of ecology specialists.
LE 01 Site selection No significant changes to criteria, only minor alterations towording.
LE 02 Identifying and
understanding the risks
and opportunities for the
project
Two routes, Route 1 with project team member (1 credit), or Route 2 with
ecologist (2 credits), dependent on site’s ecological complexity, one exemplary
credit available.
❖❖❖ ££
LE 03 Managing negative
impacts on ecology
Two routes, Route 1 by project team member (2 credits), or Route 2 by
ecologist (3 credits), dependent on site’s habitats.
• Route 1 -collaborate with design team to plan ecologically sensitive site
works / design, and avoid / protect / reduce negative impacts on site’s
existing ecology.
• Route 2 -collaborate with design team to plan ecologically sensitive site
works / design, and avoid / protect / reduce / compensate negative impacts
on site’s existing ecology.
❖❖❖ £
No longer a mandatory requirement for any BREEAM ratings.
NEWmethod
NEWmethod
LE
Land Use andEcology
Ref Credit Key change Scale of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impact
LE 04 Change and
enhancement of
ecological value
Two routes, Route 1 by project team member (1 credit), or Route 2 by
ecologist (4 credits), dependent on site’s habitat complexity. New calculation
methodology.
• Route 1 - implement locally appropriate ecological enhancements, feed back
data to local wildlife records centre.
• Route 2 -on / off site enhancements have been implemented, improved
calculation of change in ecological value based. Habitat calculation based on
the Defra biodiversity metric.
❖❖❖ £
LE 05 Long termecology
management and
maintenance
Two routes, Route 1 by project team member (1 credit), or Route 2 by
ecologist (2 credits), dependent on site’s habitat complexity
• Route 1 & 2 -commitments from client/tenant to monitor and maintainthe
site’s proposed ecological features, production of landscape and ecology
management plan.
❖❖❖ £
NEWmethod
NEWmethod
LE
CHANGE 9 - POL 02 LOCAL AIR QUALITY NOX EMISSIONS
• Benchmarks for NOx have been revised. All emissions benchmarks are percentage improvements on EU legislative minimums
• This section has been made broader to cover particle pollution from biomass and solid fuel systems in addition to NOx emissions.
• Two credits are available by using low emission appliances to provide heat and hot water in the buildings.
Pollution
Ref Credit Key change Scale
of
change
Resource
impact
Cost
impac
t
POL 01 Impact of refrigerants Impact of refrigerants criteria and benchmarks have remained thesame.
Clarifications have been added to the criteria for refrigerant leakdetection
credit (no significant changes).
POL 02 Local air quality Focus has changed to local air quality – credits are available by default for
heating and hot water supplied by non-combustion systems. Alternatively
credits can be based on NOx, Particulate Matter, and VOC emissions of the
installed systems.
Developments with heating supplied via grid electricity no longer penalised for
this credit.
❖❖
POL 03 Flood and surface water
management
Appointment of a suitably qualified consultant now required as apre-requisite
for any credits to be achieved.❖ £
3 0 % improvement now required for surface water run-off credits.❖
POL 04 Reduction of night
time light pollution
No significant changes tocriteria.
POL 05 Reduction of
noise pollution
No significant changes tocriteria.
POL
Centrica Business Solutions 43
Sustainability Champion: Case Study
Key Sustainability Champion role for
Canary Wharf Group
AIR WATER ENERGY
BIODIVERSITYHEALTH AND
WELLBEINGINNOVATION
Environmental Features assessed
Air
Through good design specification CWG buildings and Estate enhance internal and external air quality.
• Design envelope and entryways to minimise
pollution infiltration
• Design ventilation system to eliminate external
pollutants
• Prevent mound and microbe growth by using
UV treatment
• Select healthy material to improve indoor air
quality
• Provide Smoke free environment
• Minimise construction pollution through good
practice
• Monitor air quality on the estate regularly
• Improve air quality through extensive green
infrastructure
Water
Water Consumption
• Achieved up to 55% reduction in water
consumption in our outstanding buildings.
• Reduced water demand through use of
low flow rate fixtures
• Specified drought resistant planting in all
our parks and gardens.
• Facilitated good quality drinking water to
all visitors and users.
Drainage
• Implemented very efficient Sustainable
Urban Drainage Systems (SuDS) on the
estate
• Provided flood storage attenuation system
with sunken garden at dock level in our
cross rail station
CWG estate design aims to reduce water demand and manages surface water in a sustainable way
Energy and
Carbon
• Passive design analysis for all commercial
buildings to reduce energy demand
• Facade design to reduce demand and provide
optimum daylight and views
• Renewable energy technology in buildings.
• Innovative use of Renewable energy by use of
solar powered benches and UK’s first transparent
solar panelled bus stop
• Use of low embodied carbon materials
• Efficient mechanical and electrical systems to
reduce operational energy
• Green transport systems like cycling, electric
vehicles and public transport nodes.
We investigate passive design measures and implement energy hierarchy in designs
Biodiversity
One of the first developers to produce a
biodiversity action plan in the UK and converted a
brownfield site into thriving estate maximising
green infrastructure
• 30 years ago Canary Wharf was inherently a
brownfield site with no natural ecosystem. Today
the estate has:
• 4 urban parks
• 24,000 sqm of park/amenity space
• 348,000 sqm of open water habitat
• 2000 sqm of tree cover with a mix of over 30
species
• 13 buildings with living roofs covering 8000 sqm
• The estate is home to over 30 species of trees,
protected plant species, bird and bat boxes,
insect hotels and beehives.
Health and
WellbeingWe create thriving spaces that promote good human health, wellbeing and productivity to all users
and visitors.
• Public realm design to encourage a sense of
community
• Active transport systems including walking and
cycling encouraged with river walks, cycle parking,
parks with walkways
• Outdoor activities like yoga in cross rail, marathon
and various activities to encourage active lifestyle
• Selection of materials to help with indoor air quality
• Access to nature and river views for mental health
promotion
• Healthy eating options on the estate
Innovation
Innovation is the key driver for progress in everything we do!
• We design for future resilience:
• Climate change
• Functional adaptability of space
• Artificial Intelligence and other technology
• Changing user needs and perception
How can we help you?
• AIG can offers expert advice across all BREEAM schemes and building types, with sustainability specialists across a number of the BREEAM assessment categories. Our BREEAM Assessors and BREEAM Advisory Professional (AP) experts have worked on over 800+ BREEAM projects, across 14 different BREEAM schemes.
• Tailored In-house BREEAM champions, third party independent reviewers or BREEAM assessors to support your projects
• Access to BREEAM process management and calculation tools to ease the complex and painful evidence collection and certification process.
• BREEAM Project Managers – from assessing and appointing specialists tomanaging expectations from BRE.
Centrica Business Solutions 52
Completed Project Case Studies
Our Projects
Rizon Jet Airport Terminal, Biggin Hill
• SBEM calculations• Heat load calculations• Energy Strategy• Daylighting Analysis• Thermal Comfort Modelling
Riverside Studios• Energy strategy• Sustainability Statement• Overheating analysis• SAP, SBEM & EPC’s
Our Projects
AFC Wimbledon Stadium
• Energy strategy, • Sustainability Statement• Renewable Feasibility
Study• SAP & SBEM calculations
for Planning• BREEAM Pre-Assessments• BREEAM New
Construction 2014
Our Projects
Lindo Wing, St. Mary's Hospital• Heat load calculations• Carbon Reduction Calculations• Sustainability Strategy• Part L Building Regulations Compliance
Our Projects
Home Park Road, Wimbledon
• High End Residential Villa Sustainability Advise • Energy Strategy• SAP and EPC • Heat load calculations
Our Projects
Apex House, Seven Sisters
• Heat load calculations • overheating assessment• SAP & SBEM Part L Building Regulations
calculations• Sustainable Design Advise
Our Projects
44 Gloucester Avenue, Camden
• Energy Strategy• Sustainability Statement• Overheating Analysis• SAPs and SBEM• BREEAM Pre-Assessments• BREEAM Non-Domestic Refurbishment
and Fit out 2014• BREEAM Domestic Refurbishment 2014• S106 Energy & Sustainability Planning
Obligations
Our Projects Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines
Scope of Work: • Early stage Sustainable design strategies• Computer aided performance simulations and Energy
Modelling analysis• LEED certification and USGBC submission
Project Deliverables: • Energy Modelling Simulation analysis results• Detailed Report and feedback on the analysis• Produce the documents required for the Design
submission of EAc1 and EAp1 LEED credits• Design recommendations and performance
improvement suggestions for optimizing energy savings through passive and active design solutions in its scope of services.
Our Projects
Interpol global complex for innovation (IGCI)Tanglin, SingaporeScope of Work: • Early stage Sustainable design strategies• Testing and Setup Calculations for Energy Analysis (energy saving calculations
to achieve targeted rating (Platinum) • Progressive Energy Analysis to advise the project team on considerable
improvements in the designed systems.• Computer aided performance simulations and Energy Modelling analysis for
justification of results• LEED certification and USGBC submission
Project Deliverables: • Energy Modelling Simulation analysis results• Detailed Report and feedback on the analysis• Produce the documents required for the Design submission of EAc1 and EAp1
LEED credits• Design recommendations and performance improvement suggestions for
optimizing energy savings through passive and active design solutions in its scope of services
Thank youRohan Shiram
Director – Energy & Sustainability
07825059125
AIG + Partners
The Mille Tower,
1000 Great West Road
Brentford, TW8 9DW, UK