access 2005 tagging

45
Sorting Out Social Classification Tagging and Folksonomies in Practice Gene Smith Access 2005 October 17, 2005

Upload: daniele

Post on 07-Dec-2014

1.002 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Access 2005 Tagging

Sorting Out Social Classification

Tagging and Folksonomies in Practice

Gene SmithAccess 2005

October 17, 2005

Page 2: Access 2005 Tagging

About Me

• Principal, nForm User Experience Consulting• Information Architect

– Founding member of the Information Architecture Institute

– Advisory board– Folksonomies Panel, IA Summit 2005

• Blogs– http://atomiq.org– http://tagsonomy.com

Page 3: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 4: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 5: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 6: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 7: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 8: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 9: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 10: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 11: Access 2005 Tagging

Tags & Tagging

Tags• User-added descriptive metadata

Tagging• The practice of

– users adding descriptive metadata to resources– allowing users to add and share their own

descriptive metadata

Page 12: Access 2005 Tagging

Some Examples

Social Bookmarking

Media Sharing

Weblogs Other

Page 13: Access 2005 Tagging

“Folksonomy is a neologism for a practice of collaborative categorization using simple tags.”

- Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Folksonomy

Page 14: Access 2005 Tagging

“Folksonomy is a neologism for a practice of collaborative categorization using simple tags.”

- Wikipediahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Folksonomy

Page 15: Access 2005 Tagging

Collaborative Categorization

• Tags are shared• Feedback loop

Page 16: Access 2005 Tagging

Simple Tags

• Flat namespace• No hierarchy• Simple interface (text box)• WordsSmashedTogether

– “sometaithurts”

Page 17: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 18: Access 2005 Tagging

Kinds of Folksonomy

BroadMany users tag one

resource

Examples:Del.icio.us, Furl, Digg

NarrowFew users tag one

resource

Examples:Flickr, Technorati

Page 19: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 20: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 21: Access 2005 Tagging

“The old way creates a tree. The new rakes leaves together.”

- David Weinberger

Page 22: Access 2005 Tagging

“Folksonomies … don't support searching and other types of browsing nearly as well as tags from controlled vocabularies applied by professionals.”

- Lou Rosenfeld

“Building, maintaining, and enforcing a controlled vocabulary is, relative to folksonomies, enormously expensive… - Clay Shirky

Page 23: Access 2005 Tagging

“Folksonomies … don't support searching and other types of browsing nearly as well as tags from controlled vocabularies applied by professionals.”

- Lou Rosenfeld

“Building, maintaining, and enforcing a controlled vocabulary is, relative to folksonomies, enormously expensive… - Clay Shirky

Page 24: Access 2005 Tagging

“It’s just as problematic to ignore the compelling social, cultural, and academic arguments against lowest-common-denominator classification… - Liz Lawley

“The mass amateurization of publishing means the mass amateurization of cataloging is a forced move.”

- Clay Shirky

Page 25: Access 2005 Tagging

“It’s just as problematic to ignore the compelling social, cultural, and academic arguments against lowest-common-denominator classification… - Liz Lawley

“The mass amateurization of publishing means the mass amateurization of cataloging is a forced move.”

- Clay Shirky

Page 26: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 27: Access 2005 Tagging

Ontology is Overrated

• Classification of the web has failed• Classification itself is filled with bias

and error• Tagging is the solution

• http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html

Page 28: Access 2005 Tagging

Two core questions

• What’s a sustainable way to classify the big messy web?

• Can a loosely organized network of individuals categorizing things for their own interest succeed where the librarians failed?

Page 29: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 30: Access 2005 Tagging

• “Yes, of course it would be easier. This is what is so radical about tagging — it would be easier because other people would do it for you.”

Page 31: Access 2005 Tagging

• “Yes, of course it would be easier. This is what is so radical about tagging — it would be easier because other people would do it for you.”

• Would they? Would you want them to?

Page 32: Access 2005 Tagging

• “Tagging bulldozes the cost of classification and piles it onto the price of discovery.”

– Ian Davis

Page 33: Access 2005 Tagging

The Big Messy Web

Page 34: Access 2005 Tagging

The Big Messy Web

• Ecosystem of Discovery– Email, Blogs, Search, News, Tags

• Constrained Domain– Security, privacy, content, community

• Big Messy Web– Pockets of local structure

Page 35: Access 2005 Tagging

Problems with Tagging

• Findability• Collection Management• Accuracy• Scalability

Page 36: Access 2005 Tagging

Benefits of Tagging

• Increased re-findability• User engagement & investment• Social interaction & community• Ad hoc user research• More metadata!

Page 37: Access 2005 Tagging

The Green Pages

• Expertise Directory• Intranet Application

– Name– Business contact information– Skills– Responsibilities

Page 38: Access 2005 Tagging

Features

• Synonyms– Basic authority file – “Tagging tags”– Adding descriptions

• Suggestions– Google Suggest * Flickr

Page 39: Access 2005 Tagging

What tagging means

• “I am describing my skills”• “I share skills with others in my

business unit”• “I am describing the skills of my

business unit”• “All/some/few of my skills are

relevant”

Page 40: Access 2005 Tagging

Authority, Accuracy and Trust

• “Knowledge is messy”• “There’s duplication/overlap in the skills

list”• “Can we group different kinds of skills?”• “How do you know someone has that skill?”• “How do you validate skills?”• “Are there liability issues?”

Page 41: Access 2005 Tagging

Approaches to managing tag sets

• Capture, contain, cleanse– Sacrifice agility in the long-term

• Semi-professionalization– Give engaged taggers tools to help

manage the tag cloud

• Algorithms– Scalable

Page 42: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 43: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 44: Access 2005 Tagging
Page 45: Access 2005 Tagging

Summary

• Tagging is augmentation– Re-findability, user engagement

• Tagging is an immature tool• Consider the ecosystem of discovery

– Search, taxonomies & tags playing together