Slide 1

Slide 2

A Presentation on Resilient Packet Ring Technology 28-JUL-20132

Slide 3

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. ETHERNET AND SONET. LIMITATIONS OF ETHERNET AND SONET. WHY RPR TECHNOLOGY ? RPR TECHNOLOGY. CLASSIFICATION OF QOS. RPR CHARACTERISTICS. PACKET RING STANDARD DEVELOPMENT. CONCLUSION. S7 ECE DEPT3

Slide 4

INTRODUCTION Packet-based technologies from LAN to MAN MAC protocol for metro fiber ring networks. Emerging network Transport of data traffic over optical fiber ring networks. Ethernet and sonet 4

Slide 5

Todays Traditional Metro Access Networks ETHERNET SONET 5

Slide 6

ETHERNET Service offered via Ethernet interface. Speed10 Mbps to 10 Gbps Rapid acceptance in the marketplace. Familiarity, simplicity, and low cost. 6

Slide 7

SONET Synchronous optical network. High speed. Run on optical fiber. Multiplexing protocols. Point-to-point circuits between ring nodes. 7

Slide 8

WHY RPR TECHNOLOGY ? Limitations of sonet and ethernet. Fixed Circuits. Multicast Traffic. Wasted Protection Bandwidth. Does not have a fast protection mechanism. Not good at implementing global fairness. 8

Slide 9

WHY RPR TECHNOLOGY Reliability and manageability Advanced Protection. Distributed Control. Speed And Number Of Nodes. Plug-and-play Operation. Performance Monitoring Capabilities. Bandwidth Management. Unicast, Multicast And Broadcast Data Traffic. 9

Slide 10

WHAT IS RPR TECHNOLOGY Resilient Packet Ring Tech Symmetric Counter-rotating Rings Physical Layers Spatial Reuse Quality Of Service 10

Slide 11

Symmetric Counter-rotating Rings 11

Slide 12

Wrapping the Packets 12

Slide 13

Physical Layers Physical layer: two existing physical layers of high interest Ethernet and Sonet/SDH. There are two varieties of each: Gigabit Ethernet reconciliation sublayer (GERS) for the Gigabit Ethernet 10-Gigabit Ethernet reconciliation sublayer (XGERS) for the 10-Gigabit Ethernet Sonet/SDH reconciliation sublayer (SRS) for Generic Framing Procedure (GFP) GFP reconciliation sublayer (GRS) for GFP adaptation sublayer only 26-JUL-2011S7 ECE DEPT13

Slide 14

SPATIAL REUSE Unlike SONET / SDH, bandwidth is consumed only between the source and destination nodes. Packets are removed at their destination, leaving this bandwidth availableto downstream nodes on the ring. 14

Slide 15

CLASSIFICTIONS OF QOS SERVICE TYPE Class A (high-priority) Class B (medium-priority) Class C (low-priority). 15

Slide 16

The 802.17 MAC controls traffic access to four different logical services on the ring three of which provide different QOS capabilities: CLASS A It is a High priority Quality of service, it provides indefeasible reserved bandwidth that cannot be reclaimed by active lower-priority traffic, even if there is idle bandwidth available on the channel. 16

Slide 17

CLASS B It is a medium priority Quality of service it provides reserved bandwidth that may be reclaimed by active equal- or lower-priority traffic if there is idle bandwidth available on the channel. 17

Slide 18

CLASS C It is a Low priority Quality of Service it provides a share of any unused ring bandwidth. This channel is for best - effort services only. 18

Slide 19

RPR CHARACTERISTICS 1.Packet ADM Architecture. 2.Spatial Reuse. 3.Resiliency. 4.Bandwidth Fairness. 5.Broadcast or Multicast Traffic. 19

Slide 20

SPATIAL REUSE 20 Increase Efficiency. Bidirectionallytraffic. Provide Full Bandwidth.

Slide 21

RESILIENCY Recovery from a Fiber Cut Self-healing or automatic recovery. 21

Slide 22

RECOVERY FROM FIBER CUT 22

Slide 23

Broadcast or Multicast Traffic Natural fit for broadcast and multicast traffic. Nodes can simply receive the packet and forward it. Packet by sending one copy around the ring. Reserved Bandwidth of RPR is the bandwidth as the SONET multicast. 23

Slide 24

BANDWIDTH FAIRNESS 24 ETHRNET RPR TECH

Slide 25

PACKET RING STANDARD DEVELOPMENT IN IEEE 802.17 The Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers ( IEEE ) began the RPR standards ( IEEE 802.17) development project in December 2000 with the intention of creating a new Media Access Control layer for fiber optic rings. IEEEMedia Access Control layer 25

Slide 26

Some of the goals of the 802.17 Supports dual counter rotating ring topology. Full compatibility with IEEE's 802 architecture. Protection mechanism with sub 50ms fail-over. Packets destination stripping. Avoid technical risk. 26

Slide 27

CONCLUSION True alternative to SONET transport for packet networks. Fast protection, restoration, and performance monitoring comparable of SONET. Unlike SONET RPR provides an ETHERNET like cost curve as well as superior bandwidth utilization. RPR MAC with Ethernet offers highly efficient metro networks. 27

Slide 28

THANK YOU

Slide 29

QUIESTIONS 29 ?