a modular bioreactor for mechanical conditioning …...a modular bioreactor for mechanical...

1
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society EU Meeting -2010 Galway, Ireland A Modular Bioreactor for Mechanical Conditioning of Tissue Engineered Constructs: An Application on Endothelial Cells Yannis F Missirlis, Stergios C Dermenoudis, Corresponding Author: [email protected] Laboratory of Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics Dept., University of Patras, Rion, Greece Introduction Tissue engineering offers the possibility of developing a biological substitute material in vitro using bioreactors in which the in vivo mechanical and biochemical conditions are simulated. The hypothesis that drives our experimental work is that endothelial cells (EC) are able to differentiate towards a specific phenotype when cultivated under a given set of mechanical stimuli. To assess that, a novel bioreactor capable of submitting ECs’ to 1) shear stresses (blood flow), 2) normal stresses (internal pressure), 3) mechanical stress (substrate strain) and 4) gravitational forces was constructed. Materials and Methods The bioreactor was designed with Solidworks 2008. The engineering drawings guided the construction of the device (fig.1). Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) tubular pieces (4mm inner diameter) were coated with 4% gelatine crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. The tube was loaded on the bioreactor. Bovine capillary endothelial cells (BCE-HT + ) were infused (50.000 cells/cm 2 ) while the rotation mode was activated (9rph). 4hrs later a mechanical stimulus was superimposed. After 12hrs of exposure to a specific mechanical environment, cell viability and morphology response were evaluated by fluorescein diacetate (FDA)/propidium iodide (PI) staining. Images of the cells were acquired using confocal microscopy. Results A shear rate of 10 3 s -1 causes the cells to reorient parallel to the flow direction (1) (fig.2A). Cyclic uniaxial stretch of 6,7% at 1Hz induces a vertical orientation of the cell population (2) (fig.2B). The rotation of 1800rph results in elongated cells and the creation of spiral formations (fig.2C). When rotation is combined with the other stimuli, it suppresses the elongation of the cells but does not affect their orientation profile (fig.2D-E). Fig. 1. A) Oscillating plate delivering the uniaxial substrate strain. B) Loaded biomaterial specimen seeded with ECs. C) Rotation mechanism. D) Medium inflow and outflow delivering the shear stress to the ECs Fig. 2. FDA/PI staining of ECs Discussion and Conclusions The use of the described modular bioreactor has enabled us to observe the response of ECs to a combination of relevant mechanical stimuli. Experiments with different extra cellular matrices (ECMs), primary ECs and force modalities are in progress. References 1. Kataoka N. (1998) Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 36(1), 122. 2. Moretti M. (2004) J. of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 15, 1159. Disclosures Authors have nothing to disclose.

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Modular Bioreactor for Mechanical Conditioning …...A Modular Bioreactor for Mechanical Conditioning of Tissue Engineered Constructs: An Application on Endothelial Cells Yannis

Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society – EU Meeting -2010Galway, Ireland

A Modular Bioreactor for Mechanical Conditioning of Tissue Engineered Constructs: AnApplication on Endothelial Cells

Yannis F Missirlis, Stergios C Dermenoudis,Corresponding Author: [email protected]

Laboratory of Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering & Aeronautics Dept.,University of Patras, Rion, Greece

IntroductionTissue engineering offers the possibility ofdeveloping a biological substitute material invitro using bioreactors in which the in vivomechanical and biochemical conditions aresimulated.The hypothesis that drives our experimentalwork is that endothelial cells (EC) are able todifferentiate towards a specific phenotype whencultivated under a given set of mechanicalstimuli. To assess that, a novel bioreactorcapable of submitting ECs’ to 1) shear stresses(blood flow), 2) normal stresses (internalpressure), 3) mechanical stress (substrate strain)and 4) gravitational forces was constructed.

Materials and MethodsThe bioreactor was designed with Solidworks2008. The engineering drawings guided theconstruction of the device (fig.1).Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA) tubular pieces(4mm inner diameter) were coated with 4%gelatine crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. Thetube was loaded on the bioreactor.Bovine capillary endothelial cells (BCE-HT+)were infused (50.000 cells/cm2) while therotation mode was activated (9rph). 4hrs later amechanical stimulus was superimposed.After 12hrs of exposure to a specific mechanicalenvironment, cell viability and morphologyresponse were evaluated by fluorescein diacetate(FDA)/propidium iodide (PI) staining. Images ofthe cells were acquired using confocalmicroscopy.

ResultsA shear rate of 103s-1 causes the cells to reorientparallel to the flow direction(1) (fig.2A). Cyclicuniaxial stretch of 6,7% at 1Hz induces a verticalorientation of the cell population(2) (fig.2B). Therotation of 1800rph results in elongated cells andthe creation of spiral formations (fig.2C). Whenrotation is combined with the other stimuli, it

suppresses the elongation of the cells but doesnot affect their orientation profile (fig.2D-E).

Fig. 1. A) Oscillating plate delivering theuniaxial substrate strain. B) Loaded biomaterialspecimen seeded with ECs. C) Rotationmechanism. D) Medium inflow and outflowdelivering the shear stress to the ECs

Fig. 2. FDA/PI staining of ECs

Discussion and ConclusionsThe use of the described modular bioreactor hasenabled us to observe the response of ECs to acombination of relevant mechanical stimuli.Experiments with different extra cellularmatrices (ECMs), primary ECs and forcemodalities are in progress.

References1. Kataoka N. (1998) Medical & BiologicalEngineering & Computing, 36(1), 122.2. Moretti M. (2004) J. of Materials Science:Materials in Medicine, 15, 1159.

DisclosuresAuthors have nothing to disclose.