a high-input voltage two-phase series-capacitor dc-dc...

15
Research Article A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila and Simon S. Ang Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila; [email protected] Received 15 December 2019; Revised 19 April 2020; Accepted 23 April 2020; Published 8 June 2020 Academic Editor: Herve Morel Copyright © 2020 Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila and Simon S. Ang. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A high-input voltage 2-phase series-capacitor (2-pscB) DC-DC buck converter is theoretically analyzed, designed, and imple- mented. A new design approach for an automatic current sharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitor syn- chronous buck converter. e series-capacitor voltage is used to achieve current sharing between phases without a current sensing circuit or external control loop as each phase inductor charges and discharges the series capacitor to maintain its average capacitor voltage constant. A novel isolated gate driver circuit to accommodate an energy storage capacitor is proposed to deliver isolated gate voltages to the switching transistors. An I 2 control scheme that uses only one feedback path control for the four gate drivers is proposed to enable higher voltage conversion. An experimental 110-12 V 6 A load prototype converter was designed, and its current sharing characteristics were experimentally verified. 1. Introduction Two-phase series-capacitor buck converters were introduced to power laptops as low-voltage, high-current voltage reg- ulator modules (VRMs) as well as nonisolated point-of-load (POL) converters [1–3]. Automatic current sharing is im- portant to distribute heat generation in multiphase switching topologies at full load without the need to use current sensing circuit or external control loop between phases. Current sharing implementation for multiphase switching converter topologies is reported in [4–8]. e automatic current sharing concept is the main feature of this double step-down buck topology where the series capacitor was utilized to accomplish current sharing. 2-pscB is a unique converter topology that combines the benefits of a switch capacitor circuit as a DC source and a two-phase buck converter [9–11]. Usually, these converters are used as low- voltage (<12V) POL voltage regulators [12]. In this work, a high-voltage input (110V) 2-pscB con- verter is theoretically analyzed, designed, and implemented to examine the capability of current sharing at a higher voltage level and its impact on overall efficiency [13]. A new design methodology, without using fudge factors or con- stants compared to previous designs [14], is used to im- plement an automatic current sharing scheme. e practical implementation of the 2-pscB converter is a challenging task due to the complexity of gate driver galvanic isolation due to timing mismatch between phase A switches. e two con- ventional bootstrap structures as shown in paper [1] are unsuitable for higher input voltages, and bootstrap diode isolation is not adequate to provide stability to gate driver reference voltage because voltage swing is common due to charging and discharging of the series capacitor between the phase A gate drivers. A new isolated gate driver circuit to accommodate an energy storage capacitor is proposed to deliver isolated gate voltages to the switching transistors. An I 2 control scheme that enables higher voltage conversion is proposed that uses only one feedback path control to drive the 4 gate drivers. An experimental 110-12 V at 6 A load prototype converter was designed, and its current sharing characteristics were experimentally verified to show that a higher input voltage is possible compared to low input voltage [14, 15] using an integrated circuit controller driving internal FETs of TPS54A20. Figure 1(a) shows the two-phase Hindawi Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Volume 2020, Article ID 9464727, 15 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9464727

Upload: others

Post on 27-Feb-2021

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

Research ArticleA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DCBuck Converter

Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila and Simon S Ang

Department of Electrical Engineering University of Arkansas Fayetteville AR 72701 USA

Correspondence should be addressed to Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila saa016uarkedu

Received 15 December 2019 Revised 19 April 2020 Accepted 23 April 2020 Published 8 June 2020

Academic Editor Herve Morel

Copyright copy 2020 Salahaldein Ahmed Rmila and Simon S Ang )is is an open access article distributed under the CreativeCommons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided theoriginal work is properly cited

A high-input voltage 2-phase series-capacitor (2-pscB) DC-DC buck converter is theoretically analyzed designed and imple-mented A new design approach for an automatic current sharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitor syn-chronous buck converter)e series-capacitor voltage is used to achieve current sharing between phases without a current sensingcircuit or external control loop as each phase inductor charges and discharges the series capacitor to maintain its average capacitorvoltage constant A novel isolated gate driver circuit to accommodate an energy storage capacitor is proposed to deliver isolatedgate voltages to the switching transistors An I2 control scheme that uses only one feedback path control for the four gate drivers isproposed to enable higher voltage conversion An experimental 110-12V 6A load prototype converter was designed and itscurrent sharing characteristics were experimentally verified

1 Introduction

Two-phase series-capacitor buck converters were introducedto power laptops as low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator modules (VRMs) as well as nonisolated point-of-load(POL) converters [1ndash3] Automatic current sharing is im-portant to distribute heat generation in multiphaseswitching topologies at full load without the need to usecurrent sensing circuit or external control loop betweenphases Current sharing implementation for multiphaseswitching converter topologies is reported in [4ndash8] )eautomatic current sharing concept is the main feature of thisdouble step-down buck topology where the series capacitorwas utilized to accomplish current sharing 2-pscB is aunique converter topology that combines the benefits of aswitch capacitor circuit as a DC source and a two-phase buckconverter [9ndash11] Usually these converters are used as low-voltage (lt12V) POL voltage regulators [12]

In this work a high-voltage input (110V) 2-pscB con-verter is theoretically analyzed designed and implementedto examine the capability of current sharing at a highervoltage level and its impact on overall efficiency [13] A new

design methodology without using fudge factors or con-stants compared to previous designs [14] is used to im-plement an automatic current sharing scheme )e practicalimplementation of the 2-pscB converter is a challenging taskdue to the complexity of gate driver galvanic isolation due totiming mismatch between phase A switches )e two con-ventional bootstrap structures as shown in paper [1] areunsuitable for higher input voltages and bootstrap diodeisolation is not adequate to provide stability to gate driverreference voltage because voltage swing is common due tocharging and discharging of the series capacitor between thephase A gate drivers A new isolated gate driver circuit toaccommodate an energy storage capacitor is proposed todeliver isolated gate voltages to the switching transistors AnI2 control scheme that enables higher voltage conversion isproposed that uses only one feedback path control to drivethe 4 gate drivers An experimental 110-12V at 6A loadprototype converter was designed and its current sharingcharacteristics were experimentally verified to show that ahigher input voltage is possible compared to low inputvoltage [14 15] using an integrated circuit controller drivinginternal FETs of TPS54A20 Figure 1(a) shows the two-phase

HindawiJournal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringVolume 2020 Article ID 9464727 15 pageshttpsdoiorg10115520209464727

series-capacitor buck converter with automatic currentsharing

)e outline of the paper is as follows Section 2 describesthe fundamentals of this topology Section 3 derives themainparameters for the 2-pscB converter Section 4 describes theisolated gate driver circuit design Section 5 presents theproposed control scheme Section 6 presents the simulationresults using LTspice Section 7 shows the experimentalprototype and characterization results to illustrate thefunctionality and performance of the 2-pscB converterSections 8 and 9 provide discussion and the summary

2 Analysis of the 2-pscB Converter

A 2-pscB converter has four switching intervals the firstswitching interval D1T with Q11 and Q22 switching on thesecond and fourth switching intervalsD2Tand (1 minus d3)TwithQ12 and Q22 switching on and the third switching intervalD3T with Q12 and Q21 switching on Figure 1(b) shows thefour switching intervals and the switching devices that areswitched on during these intervals Hence

d2 minus d1( 1113857T D2T

d3 minus d2( 1113857T D3T

1 minus d3( 1113857T 1 minus D1 minus D2 minus D3( 1113857T

(1)

where T is the switching period At steady state during thefirst switching interval the high-side switch of phase Aswitch Q11 is switched on and the inductor current flowingthrough inductor L1 charges the series capacitor Cs [3 9])e duty cycle is given as

Vo

Vin

d1 d3 minus d2( 1113857

d1 + d3 minus d2

D1D3

D1 + D3 (2)

where d1 d2 and d3 represent switching intervals for theseries-capacitor buck modes When these intervals are thesame D1 D2 D3 D Hence

Vo

Vin

D

2 (3)

To achieve the current sharing balance between the twophases the switching voltage nodes must be the sameHence

Vcs

Vin

d1

d1 + d3 minus d2

D1

D1 + D3 (4)

From equations (2) and (4) at steady-state conditionsVo

Vcs D3 (5)

3 Derivation of Design Parameters

A new design approach for an automatic current sharingscheme is presented for the 2-pscB converter )e series-capacitor voltage is used to achieve current sharing be-tween phases without a current sensing circuit or externalcontrol loop as each phase inductor charges and dischargesthe series capacitor to maintain its average capacitorvoltage constant Design parameters are derived and ex-perimentally validated

)e main switches of both phases are driven at 180degphase shifts and with a duty ratio of less than 50 )einductor currents are defined as

IL1max min IR1plusmn

12

Vo

L11 minus D1( 1113857T1113890 1113891 IR1

plusmnΔiL1

2 (6)

IL2max min IR2plusmn

12

Vo

L21 minus D3( 1113857T1113890 1113891 IR2

plusmnΔiL2

2 (7)

where IL1max minand IL2max min

are the maximum andminimumvalues of phase A and B inductor currents IR1 and IR2 arethe average load currents at phase A and B respectively Inthis 2-pscB converter the total average output inductorcurrent is the sum of both the average phase inductorcurrents For a complete current sharing the peak-to-peakripple current of a single phase is

ΔiL1 ΔiL2

1L

Vin

2minus Vo1113874 1113875Ton1113876 1113877 (8)

vin

Q11

ndashiLCs

Cin

VCs

+

L2

Co

Q12

Q21

Q22

ioL1

RVo

+ndash

+

ndash

rCo

(a)

Q11 Q22

Q22

Q22

Q12

Q12 Q21

Q12

d1T

d2T

d3T

TTime (s)

Inte

rval

s

(b)

Figure 1 (a) Circuit schematic of the 2-pscB converter and (b) switching intervals

2 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

where Ton D1T D3T As such a larger L and smaller Tonwill yield a smaller ripple current )e total average outputcurrent in terms of iL will be

Iout ILmax + ILmin

2 IR1

+ IR2 (9)

)e total inductor current at zero condition is equal tothe minimum value ILmin when Q11 is off in modes II andIV

ILmin iL(0) IL1min

+23IL2max

56Iout +

12

VoT

L

23

1 minus D3( 1113857 minus 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877 (10)

When the load current contributed by each phase is atcomplete current sharing condition IR1

IR2 ( 12) Iout

the maximum inductor current value will be at full chargingof series capacitor in phase A and at fully discharging inphase B

ILmax iL d1T( 1113857 IL1max

+13IL2max

IR1+13IR2

+12

VoT

L

13

1 minus D3( 1113857 + 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877

23Iout +

23

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877

(11)

)us the peak-to-peak inductor current ripple is

ΔiL IL1maxminus IL1min

minus13IL2max

Vo

61

Lfsw5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113888 1113889

56

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877 minus

16Iout

16

5ΔiLphaseminus Iout1113876 1113877

(12)

where ΔiLphaseis phase A or B average current ripple at full

current sharing At continuous current mode (CCM) op-eration ILmin

is a positive value During current sharingwhen L1 L2 ILmin

gt 0 we have53IR1

minusVoT

L

1 minus d1( 1113857

2minus

d2 + 1 minus d3( 1113857

31113888 1113889gt 0 (13)

)e critical value for the two-phase inductors is then

Lcritical gtR

5fsw1 minus 3D1 + 2D3( 1113857 (14)

)e phase inductance should be within 15 to 2 timesthe critical inductance given in equation (14) to yield a goodefficiency Note that the efficiency of the converter in-creases with increasing inductance with performancedegradation in its transient response To avoid this effectthe inductance value should be chosen to provide

reasonable efficiency and good transient response As suchthe output inductor value can be expressed in terms of itscurrent ripple as

Lgt5R Vo (1 minus D)

fsw 6RΔiL + Vo1113858 1113859 (15)

)e instantaneous capacitor charge stored in one half ofthe switching period can be used to determine its outputcapacitance value as shown in Figure 2

ΔQ 12

T

41113874 1113875ΔiL2

CoΔVo (16a)

orΔVo

Vo

T

96Co

T

L5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113874 1113875 (16b)

Hence during a complete current sharing

Co gt1

96fsw ΔVoVo( 1113857max

5Lfsw

(1 minus D) minus1R

1113888 1113889 (17)

Using the maximum and minimum output capacitorcurrent expressions

ΔiCo

1R + rCo

RΔiL minus Δvo( 1113857 (18)

For smaller output capacitor parasitic resistance rCoand

smaller Δvo ΔiCo ΔiL

Series-capacitor voltage VCs acts as an internal feedbackloop quantity to adjust the current sharing for the twophases As such if the inductor currents are not equal theseries-capacitor voltage would drift up or down and asmooth charging balance could not be maintained [16 17])is is because the average capacitor voltage remains con-stant only when the charge and discharging period balanceexists Inductor currents iL1 and iL2 charge and discharge theseries capacitor Cs respectively Figure 3 shows a simplifiedmathematical representation of 2-pscB converter with itsinternal current sharing mechanism resulting from the se-ries-capacitor voltage VCs including parasitic componentsIn steady-state conditions during automatic current sharingthe two inductor currents should be equal and then theaverage series capacitor voltage will be constant as well withapproximately half the input voltage across it and the seriescapacitor acts as a dc voltage source for the third intervalHence

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 3

d1 Vin minus Vcs( 1113857 minus Vcs D3 0

Mode I langiCsrang langiL1rang

Mode II IV langiCsrang 0

Mode III langiCsrang minus langiL2rangwhere

langiCsrang langiL1rangD1 minus langiL2

rangD3 0

(19)

Using the iCs waveform shown in Figure 4 if IminD1 canbe neglected the minimum Cs value can be generalized andexpressed at complete current sharing as

ΔQ D1T IminD1 +12

D1TΔiL1

2 CsΔVCs (20)

Cs D1 Vo 1 minus D1( 1113857

4f2swL1 ΔVCs

+D1T IminD1

ΔVCs (21)

CsgtD2 ( 1 minus D)

4 L f2sw ΔVCsVCs( 1113857max

(22)

)e above equations enable design parameters such asCs Co and ∆iL to be determined

One of the technical advantages of multiphase is that thecombined output ripple (total ripple) is less than the ripplecurrent in each inductor (phase ripple) )is occurs due todriving the phases out of phase In case of the 2-pscBconverter at interleaving the phases with a proper timingcircuitry ripple current reductions can be easily achievedeven under unbalanced current sharing since the series-capacitor voltage can compensate for the current differencefor certain limits that results in much less output voltageripple Assuming all the ripple voltage is caused by thecapacitance of the output capacitor the approximated peakto the peak value of the total output current ripple to befiltered by the output capacitor is

ΔiL2pscB vo(1 minus 2D)

Lfsw

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)+

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)1113896 1113897 (23)

KRCM 2 1 minusm

NlowastD1113874 1113875(2m + 1 minus Nlowast2D) (24)

where KRCM is output current ripple cancellation multiplierN is the number of the phases and floor function returns thegreatest integer value less than the argument

m floor(NlowastD) (25)

where (m + 1)N geDgemN N gem ge 0Figure 5 shows that at certain duty cycle (D) value there

is a total cancellation of the ripple current according to theabove constraints For example total ripple current

cancellation for a 2-phase converter occurs beyond a dutycycle of 025 whereas for a 4-phase converter this totalripple current cancellation occurs at duty cycle beyond 0125and between a duty cycle of 025 and 0375 as shown inFigure 5

4 A Novel Isolated Gate Driver

Figure 6 shows the gate driver circuit using a UCC27531gate driver to accommodate adding a series capacitorbetween switches Q11 and Q12 of the phase A [18] where

iCo

(∆iL2) = (∆iCo2)

t

iComax

iComin

(12)d1T

D1T(32)d1T

Q

Figure 2 Instantaneous output capacitor circuit

+

+

+ndash

+

+

Control

++

+ndash

VoVin

IL1

IL2 IO

ICsVCs

D1

D3

Automatic current sharing

++

Figure 3 Self-balancing technique for 2-pscB converter

ΔvCsvin2

iCs

vCs

iminD3

imaxD3

imaxD1

T

ΔiL12

D1T D3T

ΔiL22t

t

Q

Q

Figure 4 Series-capacitor current and voltage at steady state

4 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the gate reference voltage for the isolated high-sideswitch is the positive side of Cs whereas the gate voltagefor the low-side switch circuit requires a different iso-lation loop since its reference voltage is ground As suchan isolation scheme must encompass the entire high-sideswitch circuit because inserting a series capacitor willintroduce a time delay between the gate voltages of thetwo switches

)is will interfere with the synchronization of theswitching time and voltage level Isolation scheme is re-quired to isolate the ground loops this means there shouldbe no direct conduction path between the high-side driverand the synchronous rectifier switch driver due to thevoltage storage element of Cs )e anode of bootstrap di-odes DBstrap1 is commonly connected to a driver sourceVDD)erefore bootstrap capacitors C5 to C8 are charged bya voltage difference between the driver source voltage VDDand the series-capacitor voltage VCs during the on-times ofthe Q12 switch through the bootstrap diode DBstrap1 Since

the four bootstraps diodes are isolated using an isolated DCsource the gate voltages of the main switches Q11 andQ21 areenough to charge the bootstrap capacitors As such phase Buses the same gate drivers as phase A To reduce the cost ofthe four matched bootstrap capacitors for each gate driverC5 to C8 two of them can be eliminated For voltage higherthan 12V external FETs are used for better heat distributionand isolation [15] )e gate driver should be located as closeto the MOSFETs as possible In this way self-inductance andself-resistance of the traces will be reduced to minimizevoltage spikes and reduce EMI For a complete currentsharing dead time must be the same for both phases In theproposed circuit there are two ways to adjust the dead timebetween the high-side signal and low-side signal using twovariable resistors before and after the optocoupler Currentsink loops for the high-side switches are not similar in eachphase as illustrated in Figure 7 dVdt occurs on theMOSFET drain when the MOSFET is already held in its offstate by the gate driver )e current created by this dVdt

Vin(t)G

G

VDD

VDDDBstrap1

DC source 5V

18V+

ndash

+ndash

C4C5

C6

C7

C8

C3

C2

Rdelay Rt

Roff Doff

CS-1CS-2CS-N

1st phase

2nd phase

ENIN

MOSFETdriver

R4 R5

R6

R2

R3

PWM-1 Q11

DC sourse

C1 R1

Optocoupler

Z1

Isolated area

Figure 6 Circuit schematic of gate driver circuit for Q11

2-Ph3-Ph4-Ph

5-Ph6-Ph

0

05

1

15

2

Nor

mal

ized

pk-

pk o

utpu

t cur

rent

ripp

le

01 02 03 040Duty cycle D

Figure 5 Normalized output inductor ripple versus duty cycle

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 5

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 2: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

series-capacitor buck converter with automatic currentsharing

)e outline of the paper is as follows Section 2 describesthe fundamentals of this topology Section 3 derives themainparameters for the 2-pscB converter Section 4 describes theisolated gate driver circuit design Section 5 presents theproposed control scheme Section 6 presents the simulationresults using LTspice Section 7 shows the experimentalprototype and characterization results to illustrate thefunctionality and performance of the 2-pscB converterSections 8 and 9 provide discussion and the summary

2 Analysis of the 2-pscB Converter

A 2-pscB converter has four switching intervals the firstswitching interval D1T with Q11 and Q22 switching on thesecond and fourth switching intervalsD2Tand (1 minus d3)TwithQ12 and Q22 switching on and the third switching intervalD3T with Q12 and Q21 switching on Figure 1(b) shows thefour switching intervals and the switching devices that areswitched on during these intervals Hence

d2 minus d1( 1113857T D2T

d3 minus d2( 1113857T D3T

1 minus d3( 1113857T 1 minus D1 minus D2 minus D3( 1113857T

(1)

where T is the switching period At steady state during thefirst switching interval the high-side switch of phase Aswitch Q11 is switched on and the inductor current flowingthrough inductor L1 charges the series capacitor Cs [3 9])e duty cycle is given as

Vo

Vin

d1 d3 minus d2( 1113857

d1 + d3 minus d2

D1D3

D1 + D3 (2)

where d1 d2 and d3 represent switching intervals for theseries-capacitor buck modes When these intervals are thesame D1 D2 D3 D Hence

Vo

Vin

D

2 (3)

To achieve the current sharing balance between the twophases the switching voltage nodes must be the sameHence

Vcs

Vin

d1

d1 + d3 minus d2

D1

D1 + D3 (4)

From equations (2) and (4) at steady-state conditionsVo

Vcs D3 (5)

3 Derivation of Design Parameters

A new design approach for an automatic current sharingscheme is presented for the 2-pscB converter )e series-capacitor voltage is used to achieve current sharing be-tween phases without a current sensing circuit or externalcontrol loop as each phase inductor charges and dischargesthe series capacitor to maintain its average capacitorvoltage constant Design parameters are derived and ex-perimentally validated

)e main switches of both phases are driven at 180degphase shifts and with a duty ratio of less than 50 )einductor currents are defined as

IL1max min IR1plusmn

12

Vo

L11 minus D1( 1113857T1113890 1113891 IR1

plusmnΔiL1

2 (6)

IL2max min IR2plusmn

12

Vo

L21 minus D3( 1113857T1113890 1113891 IR2

plusmnΔiL2

2 (7)

where IL1max minand IL2max min

are the maximum andminimumvalues of phase A and B inductor currents IR1 and IR2 arethe average load currents at phase A and B respectively Inthis 2-pscB converter the total average output inductorcurrent is the sum of both the average phase inductorcurrents For a complete current sharing the peak-to-peakripple current of a single phase is

ΔiL1 ΔiL2

1L

Vin

2minus Vo1113874 1113875Ton1113876 1113877 (8)

vin

Q11

ndashiLCs

Cin

VCs

+

L2

Co

Q12

Q21

Q22

ioL1

RVo

+ndash

+

ndash

rCo

(a)

Q11 Q22

Q22

Q22

Q12

Q12 Q21

Q12

d1T

d2T

d3T

TTime (s)

Inte

rval

s

(b)

Figure 1 (a) Circuit schematic of the 2-pscB converter and (b) switching intervals

2 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

where Ton D1T D3T As such a larger L and smaller Tonwill yield a smaller ripple current )e total average outputcurrent in terms of iL will be

Iout ILmax + ILmin

2 IR1

+ IR2 (9)

)e total inductor current at zero condition is equal tothe minimum value ILmin when Q11 is off in modes II andIV

ILmin iL(0) IL1min

+23IL2max

56Iout +

12

VoT

L

23

1 minus D3( 1113857 minus 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877 (10)

When the load current contributed by each phase is atcomplete current sharing condition IR1

IR2 ( 12) Iout

the maximum inductor current value will be at full chargingof series capacitor in phase A and at fully discharging inphase B

ILmax iL d1T( 1113857 IL1max

+13IL2max

IR1+13IR2

+12

VoT

L

13

1 minus D3( 1113857 + 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877

23Iout +

23

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877

(11)

)us the peak-to-peak inductor current ripple is

ΔiL IL1maxminus IL1min

minus13IL2max

Vo

61

Lfsw5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113888 1113889

56

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877 minus

16Iout

16

5ΔiLphaseminus Iout1113876 1113877

(12)

where ΔiLphaseis phase A or B average current ripple at full

current sharing At continuous current mode (CCM) op-eration ILmin

is a positive value During current sharingwhen L1 L2 ILmin

gt 0 we have53IR1

minusVoT

L

1 minus d1( 1113857

2minus

d2 + 1 minus d3( 1113857

31113888 1113889gt 0 (13)

)e critical value for the two-phase inductors is then

Lcritical gtR

5fsw1 minus 3D1 + 2D3( 1113857 (14)

)e phase inductance should be within 15 to 2 timesthe critical inductance given in equation (14) to yield a goodefficiency Note that the efficiency of the converter in-creases with increasing inductance with performancedegradation in its transient response To avoid this effectthe inductance value should be chosen to provide

reasonable efficiency and good transient response As suchthe output inductor value can be expressed in terms of itscurrent ripple as

Lgt5R Vo (1 minus D)

fsw 6RΔiL + Vo1113858 1113859 (15)

)e instantaneous capacitor charge stored in one half ofthe switching period can be used to determine its outputcapacitance value as shown in Figure 2

ΔQ 12

T

41113874 1113875ΔiL2

CoΔVo (16a)

orΔVo

Vo

T

96Co

T

L5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113874 1113875 (16b)

Hence during a complete current sharing

Co gt1

96fsw ΔVoVo( 1113857max

5Lfsw

(1 minus D) minus1R

1113888 1113889 (17)

Using the maximum and minimum output capacitorcurrent expressions

ΔiCo

1R + rCo

RΔiL minus Δvo( 1113857 (18)

For smaller output capacitor parasitic resistance rCoand

smaller Δvo ΔiCo ΔiL

Series-capacitor voltage VCs acts as an internal feedbackloop quantity to adjust the current sharing for the twophases As such if the inductor currents are not equal theseries-capacitor voltage would drift up or down and asmooth charging balance could not be maintained [16 17])is is because the average capacitor voltage remains con-stant only when the charge and discharging period balanceexists Inductor currents iL1 and iL2 charge and discharge theseries capacitor Cs respectively Figure 3 shows a simplifiedmathematical representation of 2-pscB converter with itsinternal current sharing mechanism resulting from the se-ries-capacitor voltage VCs including parasitic componentsIn steady-state conditions during automatic current sharingthe two inductor currents should be equal and then theaverage series capacitor voltage will be constant as well withapproximately half the input voltage across it and the seriescapacitor acts as a dc voltage source for the third intervalHence

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 3

d1 Vin minus Vcs( 1113857 minus Vcs D3 0

Mode I langiCsrang langiL1rang

Mode II IV langiCsrang 0

Mode III langiCsrang minus langiL2rangwhere

langiCsrang langiL1rangD1 minus langiL2

rangD3 0

(19)

Using the iCs waveform shown in Figure 4 if IminD1 canbe neglected the minimum Cs value can be generalized andexpressed at complete current sharing as

ΔQ D1T IminD1 +12

D1TΔiL1

2 CsΔVCs (20)

Cs D1 Vo 1 minus D1( 1113857

4f2swL1 ΔVCs

+D1T IminD1

ΔVCs (21)

CsgtD2 ( 1 minus D)

4 L f2sw ΔVCsVCs( 1113857max

(22)

)e above equations enable design parameters such asCs Co and ∆iL to be determined

One of the technical advantages of multiphase is that thecombined output ripple (total ripple) is less than the ripplecurrent in each inductor (phase ripple) )is occurs due todriving the phases out of phase In case of the 2-pscBconverter at interleaving the phases with a proper timingcircuitry ripple current reductions can be easily achievedeven under unbalanced current sharing since the series-capacitor voltage can compensate for the current differencefor certain limits that results in much less output voltageripple Assuming all the ripple voltage is caused by thecapacitance of the output capacitor the approximated peakto the peak value of the total output current ripple to befiltered by the output capacitor is

ΔiL2pscB vo(1 minus 2D)

Lfsw

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)+

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)1113896 1113897 (23)

KRCM 2 1 minusm

NlowastD1113874 1113875(2m + 1 minus Nlowast2D) (24)

where KRCM is output current ripple cancellation multiplierN is the number of the phases and floor function returns thegreatest integer value less than the argument

m floor(NlowastD) (25)

where (m + 1)N geDgemN N gem ge 0Figure 5 shows that at certain duty cycle (D) value there

is a total cancellation of the ripple current according to theabove constraints For example total ripple current

cancellation for a 2-phase converter occurs beyond a dutycycle of 025 whereas for a 4-phase converter this totalripple current cancellation occurs at duty cycle beyond 0125and between a duty cycle of 025 and 0375 as shown inFigure 5

4 A Novel Isolated Gate Driver

Figure 6 shows the gate driver circuit using a UCC27531gate driver to accommodate adding a series capacitorbetween switches Q11 and Q12 of the phase A [18] where

iCo

(∆iL2) = (∆iCo2)

t

iComax

iComin

(12)d1T

D1T(32)d1T

Q

Figure 2 Instantaneous output capacitor circuit

+

+

+ndash

+

+

Control

++

+ndash

VoVin

IL1

IL2 IO

ICsVCs

D1

D3

Automatic current sharing

++

Figure 3 Self-balancing technique for 2-pscB converter

ΔvCsvin2

iCs

vCs

iminD3

imaxD3

imaxD1

T

ΔiL12

D1T D3T

ΔiL22t

t

Q

Q

Figure 4 Series-capacitor current and voltage at steady state

4 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the gate reference voltage for the isolated high-sideswitch is the positive side of Cs whereas the gate voltagefor the low-side switch circuit requires a different iso-lation loop since its reference voltage is ground As suchan isolation scheme must encompass the entire high-sideswitch circuit because inserting a series capacitor willintroduce a time delay between the gate voltages of thetwo switches

)is will interfere with the synchronization of theswitching time and voltage level Isolation scheme is re-quired to isolate the ground loops this means there shouldbe no direct conduction path between the high-side driverand the synchronous rectifier switch driver due to thevoltage storage element of Cs )e anode of bootstrap di-odes DBstrap1 is commonly connected to a driver sourceVDD)erefore bootstrap capacitors C5 to C8 are charged bya voltage difference between the driver source voltage VDDand the series-capacitor voltage VCs during the on-times ofthe Q12 switch through the bootstrap diode DBstrap1 Since

the four bootstraps diodes are isolated using an isolated DCsource the gate voltages of the main switches Q11 andQ21 areenough to charge the bootstrap capacitors As such phase Buses the same gate drivers as phase A To reduce the cost ofthe four matched bootstrap capacitors for each gate driverC5 to C8 two of them can be eliminated For voltage higherthan 12V external FETs are used for better heat distributionand isolation [15] )e gate driver should be located as closeto the MOSFETs as possible In this way self-inductance andself-resistance of the traces will be reduced to minimizevoltage spikes and reduce EMI For a complete currentsharing dead time must be the same for both phases In theproposed circuit there are two ways to adjust the dead timebetween the high-side signal and low-side signal using twovariable resistors before and after the optocoupler Currentsink loops for the high-side switches are not similar in eachphase as illustrated in Figure 7 dVdt occurs on theMOSFET drain when the MOSFET is already held in its offstate by the gate driver )e current created by this dVdt

Vin(t)G

G

VDD

VDDDBstrap1

DC source 5V

18V+

ndash

+ndash

C4C5

C6

C7

C8

C3

C2

Rdelay Rt

Roff Doff

CS-1CS-2CS-N

1st phase

2nd phase

ENIN

MOSFETdriver

R4 R5

R6

R2

R3

PWM-1 Q11

DC sourse

C1 R1

Optocoupler

Z1

Isolated area

Figure 6 Circuit schematic of gate driver circuit for Q11

2-Ph3-Ph4-Ph

5-Ph6-Ph

0

05

1

15

2

Nor

mal

ized

pk-

pk o

utpu

t cur

rent

ripp

le

01 02 03 040Duty cycle D

Figure 5 Normalized output inductor ripple versus duty cycle

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 5

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 3: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

where Ton D1T D3T As such a larger L and smaller Tonwill yield a smaller ripple current )e total average outputcurrent in terms of iL will be

Iout ILmax + ILmin

2 IR1

+ IR2 (9)

)e total inductor current at zero condition is equal tothe minimum value ILmin when Q11 is off in modes II andIV

ILmin iL(0) IL1min

+23IL2max

56Iout +

12

VoT

L

23

1 minus D3( 1113857 minus 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877 (10)

When the load current contributed by each phase is atcomplete current sharing condition IR1

IR2 ( 12) Iout

the maximum inductor current value will be at full chargingof series capacitor in phase A and at fully discharging inphase B

ILmax iL d1T( 1113857 IL1max

+13IL2max

IR1+13IR2

+12

VoT

L

13

1 minus D3( 1113857 + 1 minus D1( 11138571113876 1113877

23Iout +

23

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877

(11)

)us the peak-to-peak inductor current ripple is

ΔiL IL1maxminus IL1min

minus13IL2max

Vo

61

Lfsw5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113888 1113889

56

Vo

L( 1 minus D)T1113876 1113877 minus

16Iout

16

5ΔiLphaseminus Iout1113876 1113877

(12)

where ΔiLphaseis phase A or B average current ripple at full

current sharing At continuous current mode (CCM) op-eration ILmin

is a positive value During current sharingwhen L1 L2 ILmin

gt 0 we have53IR1

minusVoT

L

1 minus d1( 1113857

2minus

d2 + 1 minus d3( 1113857

31113888 1113889gt 0 (13)

)e critical value for the two-phase inductors is then

Lcritical gtR

5fsw1 minus 3D1 + 2D3( 1113857 (14)

)e phase inductance should be within 15 to 2 timesthe critical inductance given in equation (14) to yield a goodefficiency Note that the efficiency of the converter in-creases with increasing inductance with performancedegradation in its transient response To avoid this effectthe inductance value should be chosen to provide

reasonable efficiency and good transient response As suchthe output inductor value can be expressed in terms of itscurrent ripple as

Lgt5R Vo (1 minus D)

fsw 6RΔiL + Vo1113858 1113859 (15)

)e instantaneous capacitor charge stored in one half ofthe switching period can be used to determine its outputcapacitance value as shown in Figure 2

ΔQ 12

T

41113874 1113875ΔiL2

CoΔVo (16a)

orΔVo

Vo

T

96Co

T

L5 minus 6D1 + D3( 1113857 minus

1R

1113874 1113875 (16b)

Hence during a complete current sharing

Co gt1

96fsw ΔVoVo( 1113857max

5Lfsw

(1 minus D) minus1R

1113888 1113889 (17)

Using the maximum and minimum output capacitorcurrent expressions

ΔiCo

1R + rCo

RΔiL minus Δvo( 1113857 (18)

For smaller output capacitor parasitic resistance rCoand

smaller Δvo ΔiCo ΔiL

Series-capacitor voltage VCs acts as an internal feedbackloop quantity to adjust the current sharing for the twophases As such if the inductor currents are not equal theseries-capacitor voltage would drift up or down and asmooth charging balance could not be maintained [16 17])is is because the average capacitor voltage remains con-stant only when the charge and discharging period balanceexists Inductor currents iL1 and iL2 charge and discharge theseries capacitor Cs respectively Figure 3 shows a simplifiedmathematical representation of 2-pscB converter with itsinternal current sharing mechanism resulting from the se-ries-capacitor voltage VCs including parasitic componentsIn steady-state conditions during automatic current sharingthe two inductor currents should be equal and then theaverage series capacitor voltage will be constant as well withapproximately half the input voltage across it and the seriescapacitor acts as a dc voltage source for the third intervalHence

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 3

d1 Vin minus Vcs( 1113857 minus Vcs D3 0

Mode I langiCsrang langiL1rang

Mode II IV langiCsrang 0

Mode III langiCsrang minus langiL2rangwhere

langiCsrang langiL1rangD1 minus langiL2

rangD3 0

(19)

Using the iCs waveform shown in Figure 4 if IminD1 canbe neglected the minimum Cs value can be generalized andexpressed at complete current sharing as

ΔQ D1T IminD1 +12

D1TΔiL1

2 CsΔVCs (20)

Cs D1 Vo 1 minus D1( 1113857

4f2swL1 ΔVCs

+D1T IminD1

ΔVCs (21)

CsgtD2 ( 1 minus D)

4 L f2sw ΔVCsVCs( 1113857max

(22)

)e above equations enable design parameters such asCs Co and ∆iL to be determined

One of the technical advantages of multiphase is that thecombined output ripple (total ripple) is less than the ripplecurrent in each inductor (phase ripple) )is occurs due todriving the phases out of phase In case of the 2-pscBconverter at interleaving the phases with a proper timingcircuitry ripple current reductions can be easily achievedeven under unbalanced current sharing since the series-capacitor voltage can compensate for the current differencefor certain limits that results in much less output voltageripple Assuming all the ripple voltage is caused by thecapacitance of the output capacitor the approximated peakto the peak value of the total output current ripple to befiltered by the output capacitor is

ΔiL2pscB vo(1 minus 2D)

Lfsw

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)+

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)1113896 1113897 (23)

KRCM 2 1 minusm

NlowastD1113874 1113875(2m + 1 minus Nlowast2D) (24)

where KRCM is output current ripple cancellation multiplierN is the number of the phases and floor function returns thegreatest integer value less than the argument

m floor(NlowastD) (25)

where (m + 1)N geDgemN N gem ge 0Figure 5 shows that at certain duty cycle (D) value there

is a total cancellation of the ripple current according to theabove constraints For example total ripple current

cancellation for a 2-phase converter occurs beyond a dutycycle of 025 whereas for a 4-phase converter this totalripple current cancellation occurs at duty cycle beyond 0125and between a duty cycle of 025 and 0375 as shown inFigure 5

4 A Novel Isolated Gate Driver

Figure 6 shows the gate driver circuit using a UCC27531gate driver to accommodate adding a series capacitorbetween switches Q11 and Q12 of the phase A [18] where

iCo

(∆iL2) = (∆iCo2)

t

iComax

iComin

(12)d1T

D1T(32)d1T

Q

Figure 2 Instantaneous output capacitor circuit

+

+

+ndash

+

+

Control

++

+ndash

VoVin

IL1

IL2 IO

ICsVCs

D1

D3

Automatic current sharing

++

Figure 3 Self-balancing technique for 2-pscB converter

ΔvCsvin2

iCs

vCs

iminD3

imaxD3

imaxD1

T

ΔiL12

D1T D3T

ΔiL22t

t

Q

Q

Figure 4 Series-capacitor current and voltage at steady state

4 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the gate reference voltage for the isolated high-sideswitch is the positive side of Cs whereas the gate voltagefor the low-side switch circuit requires a different iso-lation loop since its reference voltage is ground As suchan isolation scheme must encompass the entire high-sideswitch circuit because inserting a series capacitor willintroduce a time delay between the gate voltages of thetwo switches

)is will interfere with the synchronization of theswitching time and voltage level Isolation scheme is re-quired to isolate the ground loops this means there shouldbe no direct conduction path between the high-side driverand the synchronous rectifier switch driver due to thevoltage storage element of Cs )e anode of bootstrap di-odes DBstrap1 is commonly connected to a driver sourceVDD)erefore bootstrap capacitors C5 to C8 are charged bya voltage difference between the driver source voltage VDDand the series-capacitor voltage VCs during the on-times ofthe Q12 switch through the bootstrap diode DBstrap1 Since

the four bootstraps diodes are isolated using an isolated DCsource the gate voltages of the main switches Q11 andQ21 areenough to charge the bootstrap capacitors As such phase Buses the same gate drivers as phase A To reduce the cost ofthe four matched bootstrap capacitors for each gate driverC5 to C8 two of them can be eliminated For voltage higherthan 12V external FETs are used for better heat distributionand isolation [15] )e gate driver should be located as closeto the MOSFETs as possible In this way self-inductance andself-resistance of the traces will be reduced to minimizevoltage spikes and reduce EMI For a complete currentsharing dead time must be the same for both phases In theproposed circuit there are two ways to adjust the dead timebetween the high-side signal and low-side signal using twovariable resistors before and after the optocoupler Currentsink loops for the high-side switches are not similar in eachphase as illustrated in Figure 7 dVdt occurs on theMOSFET drain when the MOSFET is already held in its offstate by the gate driver )e current created by this dVdt

Vin(t)G

G

VDD

VDDDBstrap1

DC source 5V

18V+

ndash

+ndash

C4C5

C6

C7

C8

C3

C2

Rdelay Rt

Roff Doff

CS-1CS-2CS-N

1st phase

2nd phase

ENIN

MOSFETdriver

R4 R5

R6

R2

R3

PWM-1 Q11

DC sourse

C1 R1

Optocoupler

Z1

Isolated area

Figure 6 Circuit schematic of gate driver circuit for Q11

2-Ph3-Ph4-Ph

5-Ph6-Ph

0

05

1

15

2

Nor

mal

ized

pk-

pk o

utpu

t cur

rent

ripp

le

01 02 03 040Duty cycle D

Figure 5 Normalized output inductor ripple versus duty cycle

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 5

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 4: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

d1 Vin minus Vcs( 1113857 minus Vcs D3 0

Mode I langiCsrang langiL1rang

Mode II IV langiCsrang 0

Mode III langiCsrang minus langiL2rangwhere

langiCsrang langiL1rangD1 minus langiL2

rangD3 0

(19)

Using the iCs waveform shown in Figure 4 if IminD1 canbe neglected the minimum Cs value can be generalized andexpressed at complete current sharing as

ΔQ D1T IminD1 +12

D1TΔiL1

2 CsΔVCs (20)

Cs D1 Vo 1 minus D1( 1113857

4f2swL1 ΔVCs

+D1T IminD1

ΔVCs (21)

CsgtD2 ( 1 minus D)

4 L f2sw ΔVCsVCs( 1113857max

(22)

)e above equations enable design parameters such asCs Co and ∆iL to be determined

One of the technical advantages of multiphase is that thecombined output ripple (total ripple) is less than the ripplecurrent in each inductor (phase ripple) )is occurs due todriving the phases out of phase In case of the 2-pscBconverter at interleaving the phases with a proper timingcircuitry ripple current reductions can be easily achievedeven under unbalanced current sharing since the series-capacitor voltage can compensate for the current differencefor certain limits that results in much less output voltageripple Assuming all the ripple voltage is caused by thecapacitance of the output capacitor the approximated peakto the peak value of the total output current ripple to befiltered by the output capacitor is

ΔiL2pscB vo(1 minus 2D)

Lfsw

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)+

N(D minus (mN))(((2m + 1)N) minus 2D)

D((12) minus D)1113896 1113897 (23)

KRCM 2 1 minusm

NlowastD1113874 1113875(2m + 1 minus Nlowast2D) (24)

where KRCM is output current ripple cancellation multiplierN is the number of the phases and floor function returns thegreatest integer value less than the argument

m floor(NlowastD) (25)

where (m + 1)N geDgemN N gem ge 0Figure 5 shows that at certain duty cycle (D) value there

is a total cancellation of the ripple current according to theabove constraints For example total ripple current

cancellation for a 2-phase converter occurs beyond a dutycycle of 025 whereas for a 4-phase converter this totalripple current cancellation occurs at duty cycle beyond 0125and between a duty cycle of 025 and 0375 as shown inFigure 5

4 A Novel Isolated Gate Driver

Figure 6 shows the gate driver circuit using a UCC27531gate driver to accommodate adding a series capacitorbetween switches Q11 and Q12 of the phase A [18] where

iCo

(∆iL2) = (∆iCo2)

t

iComax

iComin

(12)d1T

D1T(32)d1T

Q

Figure 2 Instantaneous output capacitor circuit

+

+

+ndash

+

+

Control

++

+ndash

VoVin

IL1

IL2 IO

ICsVCs

D1

D3

Automatic current sharing

++

Figure 3 Self-balancing technique for 2-pscB converter

ΔvCsvin2

iCs

vCs

iminD3

imaxD3

imaxD1

T

ΔiL12

D1T D3T

ΔiL22t

t

Q

Q

Figure 4 Series-capacitor current and voltage at steady state

4 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the gate reference voltage for the isolated high-sideswitch is the positive side of Cs whereas the gate voltagefor the low-side switch circuit requires a different iso-lation loop since its reference voltage is ground As suchan isolation scheme must encompass the entire high-sideswitch circuit because inserting a series capacitor willintroduce a time delay between the gate voltages of thetwo switches

)is will interfere with the synchronization of theswitching time and voltage level Isolation scheme is re-quired to isolate the ground loops this means there shouldbe no direct conduction path between the high-side driverand the synchronous rectifier switch driver due to thevoltage storage element of Cs )e anode of bootstrap di-odes DBstrap1 is commonly connected to a driver sourceVDD)erefore bootstrap capacitors C5 to C8 are charged bya voltage difference between the driver source voltage VDDand the series-capacitor voltage VCs during the on-times ofthe Q12 switch through the bootstrap diode DBstrap1 Since

the four bootstraps diodes are isolated using an isolated DCsource the gate voltages of the main switches Q11 andQ21 areenough to charge the bootstrap capacitors As such phase Buses the same gate drivers as phase A To reduce the cost ofthe four matched bootstrap capacitors for each gate driverC5 to C8 two of them can be eliminated For voltage higherthan 12V external FETs are used for better heat distributionand isolation [15] )e gate driver should be located as closeto the MOSFETs as possible In this way self-inductance andself-resistance of the traces will be reduced to minimizevoltage spikes and reduce EMI For a complete currentsharing dead time must be the same for both phases In theproposed circuit there are two ways to adjust the dead timebetween the high-side signal and low-side signal using twovariable resistors before and after the optocoupler Currentsink loops for the high-side switches are not similar in eachphase as illustrated in Figure 7 dVdt occurs on theMOSFET drain when the MOSFET is already held in its offstate by the gate driver )e current created by this dVdt

Vin(t)G

G

VDD

VDDDBstrap1

DC source 5V

18V+

ndash

+ndash

C4C5

C6

C7

C8

C3

C2

Rdelay Rt

Roff Doff

CS-1CS-2CS-N

1st phase

2nd phase

ENIN

MOSFETdriver

R4 R5

R6

R2

R3

PWM-1 Q11

DC sourse

C1 R1

Optocoupler

Z1

Isolated area

Figure 6 Circuit schematic of gate driver circuit for Q11

2-Ph3-Ph4-Ph

5-Ph6-Ph

0

05

1

15

2

Nor

mal

ized

pk-

pk o

utpu

t cur

rent

ripp

le

01 02 03 040Duty cycle D

Figure 5 Normalized output inductor ripple versus duty cycle

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 5

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 5: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

the gate reference voltage for the isolated high-sideswitch is the positive side of Cs whereas the gate voltagefor the low-side switch circuit requires a different iso-lation loop since its reference voltage is ground As suchan isolation scheme must encompass the entire high-sideswitch circuit because inserting a series capacitor willintroduce a time delay between the gate voltages of thetwo switches

)is will interfere with the synchronization of theswitching time and voltage level Isolation scheme is re-quired to isolate the ground loops this means there shouldbe no direct conduction path between the high-side driverand the synchronous rectifier switch driver due to thevoltage storage element of Cs )e anode of bootstrap di-odes DBstrap1 is commonly connected to a driver sourceVDD)erefore bootstrap capacitors C5 to C8 are charged bya voltage difference between the driver source voltage VDDand the series-capacitor voltage VCs during the on-times ofthe Q12 switch through the bootstrap diode DBstrap1 Since

the four bootstraps diodes are isolated using an isolated DCsource the gate voltages of the main switches Q11 andQ21 areenough to charge the bootstrap capacitors As such phase Buses the same gate drivers as phase A To reduce the cost ofthe four matched bootstrap capacitors for each gate driverC5 to C8 two of them can be eliminated For voltage higherthan 12V external FETs are used for better heat distributionand isolation [15] )e gate driver should be located as closeto the MOSFETs as possible In this way self-inductance andself-resistance of the traces will be reduced to minimizevoltage spikes and reduce EMI For a complete currentsharing dead time must be the same for both phases In theproposed circuit there are two ways to adjust the dead timebetween the high-side signal and low-side signal using twovariable resistors before and after the optocoupler Currentsink loops for the high-side switches are not similar in eachphase as illustrated in Figure 7 dVdt occurs on theMOSFET drain when the MOSFET is already held in its offstate by the gate driver )e current created by this dVdt

Vin(t)G

G

VDD

VDDDBstrap1

DC source 5V

18V+

ndash

+ndash

C4C5

C6

C7

C8

C3

C2

Rdelay Rt

Roff Doff

CS-1CS-2CS-N

1st phase

2nd phase

ENIN

MOSFETdriver

R4 R5

R6

R2

R3

PWM-1 Q11

DC sourse

C1 R1

Optocoupler

Z1

Isolated area

Figure 6 Circuit schematic of gate driver circuit for Q11

2-Ph3-Ph4-Ph

5-Ph6-Ph

0

05

1

15

2

Nor

mal

ized

pk-

pk o

utpu

t cur

rent

ripp

le

01 02 03 040Duty cycle D

Figure 5 Normalized output inductor ripple versus duty cycle

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 5

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 6: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

charges the Cgd Miller capacitance and is shunted by thepull-down stage of the driver

If the pull-down impedance is not sufficiently low then avoltage spike can appear in the Vgs of the MOSFET )eupper limit for the voltage at the EN node is 5V )iscomplete gate circuit contains 4 bootstrap diodes at theoutput terminals of the power supply fly-back transformer

5 An I2 Control Scheme for 2-pscB Converter

)e objective of the feedback compensation loop is to enableits closed-loop converter to possess adequate line and loadregulations with a low output voltage overshoot Multiphasecurrent sharing two loops control was proposed in [19 20]Converter control to output transfer function at full currentsharing is

Gv D(s) R

2R + rL

vin sωempty( 1113857 + 1( 1113857

s2ω2o( 1113857 + sQoωo( 1113857 + 1

(26)

where

ωempty R

CorCo

ωo

2R + rL

LCo R + rCo( 1113857

1113971

(27)

Qo

LCo 2R + rL( 1113857 R + rCo( 1113857

1113969

L + RCorL + CorCo rL + 2RCorCo( 1113857 (28)

To obtain a well-regulated average output voltage signalswitching frequency must be greater than ten times theresonant frequency for small output voltage ripple(fsw asymp 20fo recommended) )e natural output impedance(Zout) of output filter peaks at the converter resonant fre-quency (fo 12 kHz) )erefore the unity-gain crossoverfrequency (fc) must be higher than the resonance frequencyto yield a sufficient gain margin to suppress its ringing effectmaintain constant series-capacitor voltage and obtain asufficient phase margin If the equivalent series resistance(ESR) of the capacitor that dominates its impedance at

higher frequencies is neglected then the peak resonanceoccurs at

Zoutminus Max1113868111386811138681113868

1113868111386811138681113868 R

2Z2

o + r2L

2Z2o( 1113857 Z2

o + RrL( 11138572

+ r2L

1113971

(29)

where Zo LCo

1113968is the characteristic impedance of the

filterFor a converter that has a long series capacitance

charging period an enhanced I2 current control scheme isused to compare the sum of the output current (with acurrent sensing gain Zi) and analog current of its outputvoltage feedback line (with a current sensing gain Zv) to theoutput voltage of the compensated error amplifier )eenhanced I2 control can achieve a fast load transient re-sponse at a constant frequency )e equivalence series re-sistance (ESR) of the output capacitors or iL is used as thecurrent sensing resistor as shown in Figure 8(a) where theinner loop uses the inverting input signal voltage Vsenseacross the sensing resistor Rs generated by both outputcurrent io and feedback as a proportional feedback controlvariable and the outer loop uses the control signal VCgenerated by compensating the errors between the outputvoltage vo and the reference voltage Vref in the error am-plifier )e sensing voltage Vsense in the inner loop containsthe information of both the feedback output voltage andinductor current when Vsense reaches the value of VC )ecomparator changes the state at its output u(t) whichcompares with the oscillator ramp signal r(t) at twice theswitching frequency )is allows the logic latch circuit togenerate two pulses at half the oscillator frequency)e logiclatch and delay time circuit consist of logic gates and gal-vanic isolation of (10ndash50)MBd to produce four signals with amaximum 50 duty cycle that can be controlled by onlyDDrive signal variations An RC inverting negative feedbackcircuit can be added to the current regulator (comparator) toaccurately control the overall current regulator gain )eerror amplifier uses a PID compensator with a Vref of 125V

A single feedback control loop with one modulator forthe two phases gives several advantages over conventionalschemes [7 13 19] such as immunity against sensinginaccuracies which potentially reduces the complexity and

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q11

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Csn

Ci

vin

Isink

ROL

2nd phase

(a)

RGoff

Gate driver

Zener diode ofdriver voltage

Q12

vDS

Coss

CDG

CGS

Ci

vCs

Isink

ROL

(b)

Figure 7 Phase A current sink loops (a) top switch and (b) bottom switch

6 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 7: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

the number of components and size of the controller andminimizes the time propagation delay and voltage drop toenable the generation of two duty cycle pulses D1 and D3within one ramp signal period As such no offline or onlinecalibration is needed to achieve optimum efficiencyFigure 8(b) shows the waveforms within the compensatorloop where xprime(t)≜1 minus x(t) yprime(t)≜1 minus y(t)

As shown in Figure 9 the ramp signal frequency istwice the converter switching frequency to generate two-phase pulses During a step response the controller de-creases the current passing through the load to minimizethe current surge as seen in Figure 10(a) As can be seen alow overshoot voltage is due to fast-direct feedback loopaction where series-capacitor charging starts instanta-neously at zero time at the same time its soft start featureallows the output voltage to ramp up in a controlledmanner minimizing output voltage overshoot duringstartup as shown in Figure 10(b) )e step response hasonly a small effect on maintaining automatic currentsharing balance as shown in Figure 10(c) where iL1 isdecreased by switching off Q11 to achieve a predeterminedovershoot voltage magnitude as well as to enable the softstart feature As such it eliminates the need to monitorand precharge the series-capacitor voltage )e simulatedMatlab waveforms shown in Figure 10 verify the analyticaland design methods

6 Simulation Work

Using derived equations (12) to (22) the converter pa-rameters for the desired load and output ripples are de-termined )e specifications for the 11012V dc 2-pscBconverter are listed in Table 1 A two-phase series-capacitorbuck converter is simulated using LTspice )e simulationefficiency reaches 987 for a perfect dead time imple-mentation in the steady-state operation

Figure 11(a) shows the waveforms for Vds and Ids of Q11during theD1T interval As can be seen both Vds andVCs are55V Its drain current which is also the phase A inductorcurrent increases linearly to charge the series capacitor to itsmaximum voltage Figure 11(b) shows the switching lossesofQ11Current spikes occur during the switching transitionsof both Q11 and Q22 )e total switching losses are 40Wduring a 4 ns switching period Figure 11(c) shows Ig wherethe gate currents are less than 15A and 25A during therising and falling edges of the gate pulses

Figure 12 shows the series-capacitor voltage currentand two-phase inductor current waveforms during steady-

+

ndash+p

ndashn

u(t)

r(t)+ ndash

+ ndash

ndashiLCsVCs

+

L2

CoQ12

Q21

Qt

voL1

Latc

h an

d de

ad

time C

ircui

t

vo

VPP

ZiZC

ZFBVrefV

CCo

RCo

Rs

Com

pane

sato

r

rC

Io

Voltage regulator

Current regulator

Sensinganalog conditioning

Isolated gate drivers

(T = 1Fsw)DDrive

VDDrive

++

Zv

x(t)

xprime(t)

y(t)

yprime(t)

Current sense Amp gain

(T = 05 Fsw)

Q11

vin(t)

VsenseVC

Com

pens

ator

(a)

V() V(ref)

V(u) V(r)

V(Ddrive)

Vgs(Q11) Vgs(Q12)

Vgs(Q21) Vgs(Q22)

12501V12499V12497V

14V6V

ndash2V

40V20V00V

16V

ndash2V

16V

ndash2V27720ms 27741ms

Time (s)27762ms 27783ms

10V4V

7V

(b)

Figure 8 Enhanced I2 control scheme (a) circuit and (b) waveforms of the control parameters

D1T

D3T

T

T2

Vc

DDrive (T2) DDrive (T2)

U

VPP

U

VDD

DDrive = (VPP ndash U)VPP

t

t

t

t

VDD

Figure 9 Generation of the control pulses DDrive

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 7

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 8: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

Step load340A

40A30A20A10A00A

318A296A

(a)

132V124V116V

175ms 196ms 217ms 238ms

Vo

16V12V

8V4V0V

(b)

00ms 03ms 06ms 09ms 12ms 15ms

Time (s)

18ms 21ms 24ms

IL1 IL2

42A24A

ndash12Andash30A

6A

(c)

Figure 10 Simulated transient response with (a) step load (b) output voltage and (c) inductor currents of the converter

Table 1 2-pscB converter experimental evaluation parameters

Component Abbreviation ValueSeries capacitor Cs 9 μFPhase inductors L1 and L2 10 μHOutput capacitor Co gt80 μFSwitching frequency Fsw 250 kHzInput voltage Vin 110VOutput voltage Vo 125ndash135VStray components rCs 20mΩStray components ron rL1 rL2 lt20mΩOutput power Po lt75W

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11) Id (Q11)

ndash6V

0V

6V

12V

18V

24V

30V

36V

42V

48V

54V

60V

ndash2A

0A

2A

4A

6A

(a)

Figure 11 Continued

8 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 9: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

state operation As can be seen from Figure 12(a) the av-erage VCs maintains its value at exactly half of the inputvoltage with a voltage ripple of less than 05V )e outputvoltage ripple can be controlled by the size of the outputfilter )e average charging and discharging currents for theseries capacitor are similar as shown in Figure 12(b) thisverifies the steady-state operation of the 2-pscB converterFigure 12(c) shows the inductor currents iL1 and iL2 the twoinductor currents have identical magnitudes and they are180deg out of phase at steady-state operation

7 Experimental Results

)e component selections for the 2-pscB converter are firstjustified For a 254 cm long and 40-mil wide printed circuitboard (PCB) copper trace the parasitic inductance is about 8nH)e parasitic inductance of a 04mm diameter via a 16mmthick PCB is 12nH [21 22])e self-resistance calculations of alltraces are performed using the Autodesk Eagle software )e

parasitic resistance rCs can be reduced to half the value by usingtwo parallel aluminum electrolytic capacitors of 45microF with adissipation factor of 03 for the two series capacitors Cs1 and Cs2)e total ESR of the two parallel capacitors is

ESR tan δ2ωCs

002Ω at 250 kHz (30)

Two ERU (16) helically wound choke inductors with aDC resistance of 37mΩ and a current saturation of 183Aare used for the phase inductors A total of fourIPB530N15N3 power MOSFETs are required to implementthe 2-pscB and an additional power MOSFET (Si7898) isused for the fly-back converter to provide or serve as acomponent power supply as shown in Table 2 [23]

)is fly-back converter is used to supply four isolated18V to drive the gate of four MOSFETs at a frequency of323 kHz A Tektronix P5200 Differential Probe 50X500Xattenuation was used to measure voltages as shown in

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms

Vds (Q11)lowastId (Q11)

ndash40W

0W

40W

80W

120W

160W

200W

240W

280W

320W

360W

400W

440W

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash21A

ndash18A

ndash15A

ndash12A

ndash09A

ndash06A

ndash03A

00A

03A

06A

09A

12A

15A

(c)

Figure 11 Waveforms of (a) Vds and Id of Q11 (b) switching losses of Q11 and (c) gate current (source and sink) Ig of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 9

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 10: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357ms5480 V

5484 V

5488 V

5492 V

5496 V

5500 V

5504 V

5508 V

5512 V

5516 V

5520 VV (Q11_S SW1)

(a)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash6 A

ndash5 A

ndash4 A

ndash3 A

ndash2 A

ndash1 A

0 A

1 A

2 A

3 A

4 A

5 AI (Cs_2) + I (Cs_1)

(b)

1346ms 1347ms 1348ms 1349ms 1350ms 1351ms 1352ms 1353ms 1354ms 1355ms 1356ms 1357msndash04 A

00 A

04 A

08 A

12 A

16 A

20 A

24 A

28 A

32 A

36 A

40 A

(c)

Figure 12 Waveforms of (a) series-capacitor voltage VCs (b) series-capacitor current ICs and (c) inductor currents IL1 and IL2

10 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 11: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

Figure 13 )e evaluation model (EVM ) input 5 V PWMsignal with twice the switching frequency and a double dutycycle to generate four signals through the latch circuit Inputsignal and phase A generated gate driver signals are shown inFigure 14 )e input PWM signal (DDrive) will be at 500 kHzat 50 duty or less to generate four signals at 250 kHz at 25duty cycle or less As such controlling the four gate signalsbecomes easier and can be achieved with only themain input

PWM signal Signal delay time between the optocouplerinput and MOSFET gate is measured to be 170 ns whichincludes the rise time and first propagation delay time asshown in Figure 15 )e time delay is 57 ns to include boththe fall and second propagation delay times )is differenceis caused by the PCB conductors which can be reduced by abetter PCB layout as well as a multilayer structure to separatethe power conductors from the ground conductors Toachieve the required dVdt the gate driver must deliver thegate charge Qgd in 20 ns or less )is means a gate current ofIg = 3 nC20 ns = 015A or higher is needed However theMOSFET gate-source current reaches 12 A and the sinkcurrent is less (Qgd = 3 nC maximum dVdsdt= 20Vns) asshown in Figure 16 which is almost similar to the simulatedgate current value for a Rg(on) (ext) = 2Ω Rg(off) (ext) = 0(Figure 11(c)) Figure 17 exhibits the typical waveforms ofVds versus Vgs for MOSFET Q21 of phase B Figure 18 showsthe node voltages Vsw1 and Vsw2 at a switching frequency of250 kHz As can be seen these node voltages have a variationof within 05V As stated earlier these node voltages must bethe same at full current sharing Any difference or any smallvariation is caused by dead time trace width and lengthunbalance of the two phase paths or it can be the result ofswitching speed due to the different charging and dis-charging time for the MOSFETrsquos input capacitors (Cgs)Since the switch node voltage slope is caused by the loadcurrent as such the slope of Vsw1 is affected by the chargingperiod of both Cs and Co )is is because Vsw2 charges onlyCo and then a slope difference can be seen To eliminate thisdifference the value of Cs must be chosen carefully in termsof inductance variations zero dc bias inductance saturationprofiles and converter layout and Cs position

Figures 19 and 20 show the series-capacitor current iCsand inductor currents iL1 and iL2 at a resistive load currentof 24 A respectively )e phase A inductor current (iL1) hasa slightly higher peak-to-peak ripple due possibly to slopedifference and converter layout parasitic inductance )e

Table 2 2-pscB converter MOSFETs

MOSFET Ciss VDS RDS (on)max IDIPB530N15N3 667 pF 150 V 53 mΩ 21 ASi7898 (fly-back) 900 pF 150 V 85 mΩ 48 A

Vgs (Fly-backMOSFET)

Vds (Fly-backMOSFET)

5Vdiv

1μsdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 13 Fly-back gate driver signal Vgs (top waveform) anddrain source voltage Vds (bottom waveform) at the transformerinput

Input PWM

Vgs (Q11) Vgs (Q12)

02 times 50Vdiv

5Vdiv

Figure 14 Input PWM signalDDrive (top waveform) and the gate-source voltages of Q11 and Q12 (bottom waveforms)

1Vdiv

OptocouplerPWM signal

10VdivVgs Q11

Figure 15 Signal delay between the optocoupler PWM input signaland the gate-source voltage of Q11

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 11

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 12: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

maximum efficiency achieved from this prototype converteris 92 at a load current of 338A and an input current of442mA despite the peak-to-peak ripple of about 270mA dueto charging and discharging of both Cs and Co Prototype isshown in Figure 21 Maximum output power of 73W withan efficiency of 91was achieved at a full load current of 6A)e experimental and simulated efficiency results are il-lustrated in Figure 22

8 Discussion

Due to PCB trace drop voltages and layout mismatch ofthe two phases there is an expected small variation be-tween the simulation and measured efficiency resultsMoreover wires and component parasitic circuit elementsalso have a negative impact Dissipation curves show a

normal increase with increasing load currents Eventhough there is a small trace resistive unbalance betweenthe two phases its current sharing mechanism is stillfunctioning well Because of the above the node voltage atVsw2 is nearly 05 V less than that at Vsw1 Otherwiselosses are very low when current sharing condition isachieved For some cases to reduce losses and provideprotection to the MOSFET switches there is a need to addtime delay control circuit to precharge the series capacitorto half of its nominal voltage to protect the converter andreduce the charging current surge before switching on theconverter

Using only one PWM signal input of the latch logiccircuit may give an advantage for the closed-loop circuit andsimplify the control scheme where the control loop fre-quency and duty cycle should be twice the actual switching

Vgs (Q12) before Rg 10Vdiv

Ig (sink current)15AdivIg (source current)

Vgs (Q12) aer Rg 10Vdiv

Figure 16 Gate-source voltages of Q12 measured before gate resistor Rg (top waveform) and after Rg (bottom waveform)

Vds Q21

Vgs Q21

1μsdiv05 times 50Vdiv

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 17 Typical waveforms of Vds and Vgs for Q21

12 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 13: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

Vgs_Q11

1microsdiv

Vsw1

Vsw2

05 times 50Vdiv

Figure 18 Gate pulses of Q11 (top waveform) and Vsw1 and Vsw2 at 250 kHz (bottom waveforms)

Vgs_Q11

05 times 50Vdiv

ICs

02 times 50Adiv 1μsdiv

Figure 19 Series-capacitor current ICs at 250 kHz

Vgs Q11

IL2 IL1

Vgs Q21

05 times 50Vdiv

2Adiv2Adiv

1μsdiv

Figure 20 Inductor currents IL1 and IL2 at a load current of 24 A

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 14: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

frequency Since the main switches of both the phases aredriven at 180o phase shift and with a duty ratio of less than50 a push-pull controller can be implemented to achievethis range Note that the other two MOSFETs for the syn-chronous rectifier switches (lower side) are just comple-mentary switches According to Amperersquos Law the physicalphase current loop forms a magnetic field in proportion tothe output shared current and the phase loop area )is fieldcan couple with other circuit loops such as control circuit(per Faradayrsquos law) with more coupling at higher frequen-cies resulting in harmful crosstalk But this is not the case ofthis topology since the first and the third mode current loopsare nearly opposite in direction and the field will be cancelledout In this circuit there is tendency to avoid extra ldquoband-aidrdquo circuitry like snubbers to reduce line current distortionand losses )e proposed 2-pscB converter shows a goodperformance suitable for high-frequency dcdc applicationswith high step-down ratios such as those in EV dc powerconverters and laptop power suppliers )ese applicationsare restricted by physical size heat dissipation and inductorvariations

9 Summary

A new theoretical approach to design an automatic currentsharing scheme was presented for a 2-phase series-capacitorsynchronous buck converter )e effects of its phase un-balance and parasitic circuit elements were discussed An I2current feedback controller was used to regulate the outputvoltage as well as to balance the two-phase inductor currents

Experimental results were presented for an 110V12V6A 250 kHz 2-pscB converter with a newmultiphase isolatedgate driver

Data Availability

)e simulation and experimintal data used to support thefindings of this study are available from the correspondingauthor upon request

Conflicts of Interest

)e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

EMI

Fly-back converter

Seriescapacitors

Figure 21 Prototype of the 110V12V6A 2-pscB converter

Efficiency_simulationEfficiency_measured

Dissip_simulation (W)Dissip_measured (W)

Pow

er lo

ss (W

)

Efficiency vs load current

0

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

1

Effic

ienc

y

1 2 3 4 5 60Load current (A)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Figure 22 Simulated and experimental efficiencies versus load currents

14 Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15

Page 15: A High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jece/2020/9464727.pdfA High-Input Voltage Two-Phase Series-Capacitor DC-DC Buck Converter Salahaldein

References

[1] K Abe K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshimaand T Sato ldquoA novel three-phase buck converter withbootstrap driver circuitrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE PowerElectronics Specialists Conference Orlando FL USA June2007

[2] K Matsumoto K Nishijima T Sato and T Nabeshima ldquoAtwo-phase high step down coupled-inductor converter fornext generation low voltage CPUrdquo in Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Power Electronics-ECCE AsiaJeju Korea June 2011

[3] B Oraw and R Ayyanar ldquoSmall signal modeling and controldesign for new extended duty ratio interleaved multiphasesynchronous buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC06-Twenty-Eighth International Telecommunications EnergyConference Providence RI USA September 2006

[4] M M Jovanovic D E Crow and L Lieu Fang-Yi ldquoA novellow-cost implementation of ldquodemocraticrdquo load-currentsharing of paralleled converter modulesrdquo IEEE Transactionson Power Electronics vol 11 no 4 pp 604ndash611 1996

[5] D J Perreault R L Selders and J G Kassakian ldquoFrequency-based current-sharing techniques for paralleled power con-vertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 13 no 4pp 626ndash634 1998

[6] L Hua and S G Luo ldquoDesign considerations for small signalmodeling of dc-dc converters using inductor DCR currentsensing under time constants mismatch conditionsrdquo inProceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics SpecialistsConference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[7] S Mazumder M Tahir and K Acharya ldquoMasterndashslavecurrent-sharing control of a parallel DC-DC converter systemover an RF communication interfacerdquo IEEE Transactions onIndustrial Electronics vol 55 no 1 pp 59ndash66 2008

[8] P Midya P T Krein and M F Greuel ldquoSensorless currentmode control-an observer-based technique for DC-DCconvertersrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 16no 4 pp 522ndash526 2001

[9] K Nishijima K Harada T Nakano T Nabeshima andT Sato ldquoAnalysis of double step-down two-phase buckconverter for VRMrdquo in Proceedings of the INTELEC 05-Twenty-Seventh International TelecommunicationsConference Berlin Germany September 2005

[10] J A A Qahouq and L Huang ldquoHighly efficient VRM for wideload range with dynamic non-uniform current sharingrdquo inProceedings of the APEC 07-Twenty-Second Annual IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition Ana-heim CA USA March 2007

[11] P Shenoy M Amaro J Morroni and D Freeman ldquoCom-parison of a buck converter and a series capacitor buckconverter for high-frequency high-conversion-ratio voltageregulatorsrdquo IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics vol 31no 10 2016

[12] P S Shenoy M Amaro D Freeman and J MorronildquoComparison of a 12V 10A 3MHz buck converter and aseries capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Charlotte NC USA March 2015

[13] Z Lukic Z Zhao A Prodic and D Goder ldquoDigital controllerfor multi-phase dcdc converters with logarithmic currentsharingrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEE Power Electronics Spe-cialists Conference Orlando FL USA June 2007

[14] Texas Instruments TI Datasheet TPS54A20 8-V to 14-VInput 10-A up to 10-MHz SWIFTtrade Step Down Converter2016 httpwwwticomlitdssymlinktps54a20pdf

[15] P Shenoy O Lazaro R Ramani M Amaro and W WiktorldquoA 5MHz 12V 10A monolithically integrated two-phaseseries-capacitor buck converterrdquo in Proceedings of the IEEEApplied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)Long Beach CA USA March 2016

[16] P Shenoy O Lazaro and M Amaro ldquoAutomatic currentsharing mechanism in the series capacitor buck converterrdquo inIEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)Detroit MI USA September 2015

[17] P Shenoy andM Amaro ldquoImproving light load efficiency in aseries capacitor buck converter by uneven phase interleavingrdquoin Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Con-ference and Exposition (APEC) Charlotte NC USA March2015

[18] Texas Instruments ldquoTI datasheet single gate driverldquoUCC2753xrdquordquo 2012 httpwwwticomproductUCC27531

[19] X Zhou P Xu and F C Lee ldquoA novel current-sharingcontrol technique for low-voltage high-current voltage reg-ulator module applicationsrdquo IEEE Transactions on PowerElectronics vol 15 no 6 pp 1153ndash1162 2000

[20] G Zhou J Xu and J Wang ldquoConstant-frequency peak-ripple-based control of buck converter in CCM reviewunification and dualityrdquo IEEE Transactions on IndustrialElectronics vol 61 no 3 pp 1280ndash1291 2014

[21] S Maniktala Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines Na-tional Semiconductor Dallas TX USA

[22] AN-1229 Simple Switcherreg PCB Layout Guidelines httpwwwticomlitansnva054csnva054cpdf

[23] Infineon Datasheet N-OptiMOSTM3 power-transistorMOSFETs IPD530N15N3 2013

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 15