a good disruption · 2019-03-27 · low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent...

39
Prof. Dr. Martin R. Stuchtey March 18 th 2019 A Good Disruption – Redefining growth in the 21st century CONCAWE

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1

Prof. Dr. Martin R. StuchteyMarch 18th 2019

A Good Disruption –Redefining growth in the 21st century

CONCAWE

Page 2: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

22

Congruence, anomaly, or new paradigm?

SOURCE: Thomas Kuhn, Structure of a Scientific Revolution (1964)

Page 3: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

33

“The Great Divergence”Growing together

100

500

400

300

200

756560 80 20007055 9085 95501947 201005

Global GPI per capita

Real GDP per capita

Private employment

Labor productivity

Median family income

U.S. labor productivity, GDP per capita, employment, median income, and Global GPI per capita Indexed to 1947

We are seeing a “great divergence”

SOURCE: Stuchtey, et al (2015), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Brynjolfsson and McAfee , Kubiszewski et al. (2013)

Page 4: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

44

Annual GDP Growth rates in Germany, France, and the USA

70 2000

-4

05 10

6

85 20151960

2

65

-6

90

-2

080

4

75 95

8USA

GermanyFrance

4.8%3.2%

2.7%2.5%

1.3%

SOURCE: Insee, Statistisches Bundesamt, U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

Page 5: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

55

1 1990-2005, as later data not available globally,2 IWI exists in two versions, one unadjusted, and one where adjustments are made for environmental damage, oil capital gains, and total factor productivity. The adjusted version is shown here,3 Global population growth was 1.6 percent per year during the period

Gross Domestic Product

Human Development Index

Genuine Progress Indicator1

Inclusive Wealth Index2

Considerations

SocialEconomic Capital Natural

Measures of societal development that include natural capital depletion grow much slower than GDP

SOURCE: UNEP (2014a), Kubiszewski et al. (2013)

-0,2

-0,1

0,8

2,0

Progress per capital, globally, 1990 – 2010, real terms

Page 6: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

66

Paradigm shift: Most of the world’s resource using industries negative Profit margin (EBIT) before and after natural capital costs, based on top-2 companies in each Morgan Stanley Composite Index category, %, 2012

3 3

9 11 9

15 15

5 5

11

-8

-1 -1

911

-6

3

-11

-78

Cattle farming

Wheat farming

Paper-board

Cement Synthetic fertilizer

Silver mining

Bauxite mining

Iron & Steel

Non-ferrous metals

smelting

Coal power

generation

-165

Before

After

Page 7: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

77

Paradigm shift: wild vertebrates reduced to 4%

60%

36%

4%Wild mammals

Humans

Livestock for human use

Biomass weight of vertebrate population 2016

SOURCE: Bar-On, Philips, and Milo, 2018. The biomass distribution on Earth. PNAS Latest Articles ** Philip Wollen, 2012

Mass of humans and livestock 23 times that of wild mammals

Livestock outweighs wild mammals and birds by factor 11

Biomass of wild marine/ terrestrial mammals reduced six times

Wild plant biomass reduced by half

Cows are the world key predator: 90% of small fish catch is ground up for animal feed

Page 8: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

88

Paradigm shift: 15 Gt CO2 removal required to stay on Paris track

Limiting warming below 2°C with 66% probability

Limiting warming below 1.5°C with 50% probability

Ann

ual g

loba

l CO

2em

issi

ons

(GtC

O2/y

r)

Cum

ulat

ive

glob

al a

nthr

opog

enic

CO

2em

issi

ons

from

201

7 on

war

d (G

tCO

2)

Anthropogenic CO2 emissions (gross)Fossil fuel and industry

Land use and land-use change

Anthropogenic CO2 removalsLand use and land-use change

Engineering CO2 sink (BECCS)

Biosphere carbon sinkLand carbon sink

Ocean carbon sink

Whiskers on total natural sinks: the 90% range of modeled uncertainties

40

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090 2100

200

400

600

800

Human carbon sinksBiosphere carbon sinks

Human carbon emissions

Page 9: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

99

Paradigm shift: 1 kg of plastic for 1 kg of fish

Bali West Coast

Page 10: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1010

Our future operating space – uncharted

SOURCE: Global Footprint Network, 2012; UNDP, 2014a

hectares per person per year

‘Very high human development’

Human Development Index

Page 11: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1111

50mnPopulation

1 Includes EPS, HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, PET Resins, PP, PS, and PVC

40,000

125

20,0000

0 15,0005,000

50

100

30,000

75

10,000 25,000 35,000

25

Italy

Brazil

Thailand

South Africa

Canada

Taiwan

China

France

Germany

India

Japan

Mexico

United Kingdom

Saudi Arabia

Russia

South Korea

SpainSweden

United States

GDP per capita, EUR per capita

Waiting for Kuznets – example commodity plastics

COMMODITY PLASTICS

SOURCE: Global Insight

Plastic consumptionKg per capita

Page 12: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1212

The vision of a decoupled, net positive industry model

Material backbone

Abundant clean energy

Highly productive systems

Good, not less bad – as a new norm Decoupled growth as an economic standard 4

1 3 2

SOURCE: Stuchtey et al. : A Good Disruption (2015)

Page 13: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1313

In the ETC decarbonization pathways, all emissions from remaining fossil fuel use are abated with CCS/U

Coal consumptionBillion tonnes per year

Oil consumptionMillion barrels per day

Natural gas consumption000 bcm per year

Notes: All fossil fuel trajectories are based on scenarios reaching a 2°C objective with at least two-thirds probability. The charts show median fossil fuel use in 21 scenarios with less than 15 GtCO2 removal in any given year. Average removals 2050-2100 are 3 Gt/year through CCS on fossil fuels and 8 Gt/year through BECCS or other negative emissions.

SOURCE: Historic data from BP. Projects are Copenhagen Economics calculations on data from IIASA AR5 database; SYSTEMIQ analysis for the ETC (2018)

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 20500

1

4

2

3

5

6

1.81.81.8

0.20.1

-67%

-96%

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

2.0

1.0

4.0

3.0

3.63.63.6

3.1

2.0

+2% -12%

-43%

5

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050

63

10

6363

-32%

-89%

Central scenario

Supply-side decarbonization illustrative pathway

Supply-side decarbonization and efficiency illustrative pathway

Towards a 1,5°C-compatible energy system – fossil consumption pathways

Page 14: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1414

Towards a circular economy: 2016, at the European Commission

"I passionately believe in the opportunities of the circular economy. The future is not making things with finite components." Frans Timmermans, EU Commission First Vice President

"I am very impressed by the findings of Growth Within report, looking forward to developing our shared agenda" Karmenu Vella, EU Commissioner Environment, Maritime Affairs and Fisheries

"Circular economy will be a similar mega trend in economy as globalization. I'm convinced that the circular economy can enable a triple win: economic, environmental and social." Jyrki Katainen - EU Vice President Jobs, Growth, Investment and Competitiveness

Page 15: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1515

Land utilization ▪ Road reaches peak throughput only 5% of time and only 10%

covered with cars then▪ 50% of most city land dedicated to streets and roads, parking,

service stations, driveways, signals, and traffic signs

Car utilization

Rolling resistance

Energy used to move people

Aerodynamics

Transmissionlosses

Idling

Engine losses

Inertia vehicle

Auxiliary power

86% of fuel never reaches wheels

Tank-to-wheel energy flow - gasoline

12:1 dead-weight ratio

30,000 deaths in accidentsand 4x as many disabling injuries

˃ 95% of accidentsfrom human error

Deaths and injuries per year on road

5% driving1% sitting incongestion

▪ Typical Frenchcar parked 92% of time

▪ Average European car has 5 seats but carries 1.5 people/trip

1.6% looking for parking

Major structural waste in the mobility system

SOURCE: McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2015)

Page 16: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1616

Unutilized Utilized

Value recovered through waste and recycling industry

50 4035301510

Eco-systems overused a factor 1.6 to produce goods

Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-50 percent for officesB

Products only used 9 years on average, or 28 years if including buildingsC

D

A

Product life (Years since production)

After the first use cycle, only 5 percent of the raw material

value is recaptured

0

5

10

15

20

Waste, waste, everywhere – example Europe

SOURCE: McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2015)

Value development of manufactured products% of GDP for the EU in 2012

Page 17: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1717

Total savingsX

REgenerate

Share

Optimise

Loop

Virtualise

Exchange

Remaining cost

Today‘s cost ~6,600~5,500

6%

40%

<5%

5%

25%

25%

60-80%

Mobility Food

25-40%

<2%

2%

35%

<2%

<2%

6%

Cost-reduction potential in the three real life systems

SOURCE: McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2015)

~9,600Built environment

25-35%

10%

15%

15%

<2%

2%

<2%

Total annual cash-out costs per household; EU average for 2012 EUR improvement potential for 2050

Page 18: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1818

▪ Share assets (e.g. cars, rooms, appliances)▪ Reuse/secondhand▪ Prolong life through maintenance, design for durability, upgradability, etc.

▪ Increase performance/efficiency of product▪ Remove waste in production and supply chain▪ Leverage big data, automation, remote sensing and steering

▪ Remanufacture products or components▪ Recycle materials▪ Digest anaerobic▪ Extract biochemicals from organic waste

▪ Books, music, travel, online shopping, autonomous vehicles etc.

▪ Shift to renewable energy and materials▪ Reclaim, retain, and restore health of ecosystems▪ Return recovered biological resources to the biosphere

REgenerate

Share

Optimise

Loop

Virtualise

Exchange▪ Replace old with advanced non-renewable materials▪ Apply new technologies (e.g. 3D printing)▪ Choose new product/service (e.g. multimodal transport)

ReSOLVE – a menu of business actions for a better economy

SOURCE: McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2015)

Examples

Page 19: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

1919

In search of a new logic

Page 20: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2020

1PrinciplePreserve and enhance natural capital by controlling finite stocks and balancing renewable resource flows

Optimise resource yields by circulating products, components and materials in use at the highest utility at all times in both technical and biological cycles

Foster system effectiveness by revealing and designing out negative externalities

2Principle

3Principle

In search of a superior design - outline of a circular economy system (75 million downloads)

SOURCE: Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2013)

Minimize systematic leakage and negative externalities

Refurbish/remanufacture

Reuse/redistribute

Share

Stock management

RestoreVirtualise

Technical materials

Maintain

Biochemical feedstock

Cascades

Extraction ofbiochemical

feedstock

Soil restauration

Biogas

Farming/ collection

Renewables

Biological materials

Renewables flow management

BiosphereProduct manufacturer

Service provider

Parts manufacturer

Collection Collection

Substitute materials

Finite materials

Renewable materials

Consumer User

Recycle

Regenerate

Page 21: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2121

Indexed (2012 = 100) Current development scenario

Circular scenario

GDPEU-27, indexed (2012 = 100)

Direct user cash out costsEU-27, indexed (2012 = 100)

CO2 emissionsEU-27, indexed (2012 = 100)

Primary material consumption EU-27, indexed (2012 = 100)

2030 2050

104 111 115 127

20502030

90 81 74 59

20502030

6952 39

17

2030 2050

78 68 59 47

“Growth Within” developed the vision of a circular European economy – with better etter economic and environmental outcomes

Page 22: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2222

Countries are making the circular economy part of national policy priorities

The European Commission presents the Action Plan for the Circular Economy

EU 2018 Circular Economy package is passed

2.12.2015 22.5.201802/2016

09/2016 06/2017 11/201704/2018 06/2018

Making things last: A circular economy strategy for Scotland

Leading the Cycle –Finnish road map to a circular economy 2016-2025

A Circular Economy in the Netherlands by 2050

Recommendations for the Danish Government -Reduce. Reuse. Recycle. Rethink.

Towards a new model of circular economy for Italy -Overview and Strategic Framework

Roadmap towards the circular economy in Slovenia

50 measures for a 100% circular economy

ProgRess II*

12/2014

Luxemburg as a knowledge hub and testing ground for the CE – National roadmap to positive impacts

03/2016 Spring 2018

Norwegian Circular Economy Benchmark*

Circular Economy Institute Czech Republic*

International development:

• CHINA 2017 release of a circular economy policy portfolio - “ecological civilization”

• JAPAN focus on resource efficiency and recycling potential;

• CANADA thematic integration via the logic of sustainable value creation ("smart prosperity”)

09/2018

Strategy for Circular Economy

Circular Futures – Platform Kreislauf-wirtschaft Österreich*

Circular economy roadmaps and relevant initiatives

Page 23: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2323

Industries are starting to react to the new global context and avoid “stranded asset” risks

Re-orient

Re-configure

Re-invent

Integrated soilmanagement

Yield insurancePrecision farming

MiningCo

Refineries

Products-as-a-service Health-as-a-serviceEnergy efficiency

Car-as-a-service Mobility-as-a-serviceLow carbon fleet

Low-carbon value chains Chemistry-as-a-serviceClean chemistry

Responsible commodities Material bankEfficient mining

A Asset recovery & waste-to-value? B New feedstocks? C Industrial energy

provision systems?

“Regeneration”?D

Page 24: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2424

Asset-intense industries can massively benefit from equipment recovery now enabled by digital “material banks”

A

RecycleEfficient

production

Renewable recources

Non-renewable recources

CompanyDesign, manufacturing, supply

of technology & services

Cascades

Collection

Consumption of products

Efficient production Maintenance

Reuse/refurbish

Recycle

Renewable material flowNon-renewable material flow

Customer of ompanyUtilization of company

technology and services

Other value chains

Other value chains

Page 25: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2525

Plastic is the workhorse material of the global economy and growth engine of the petrochemical industry – facing massive headwinds

Plastic, one word, thousands of different materials developed by chemists over 70 years for different applications and different fields.

As of 2015, 7.8 bn tons of plastic material was produced globally.1 Plastic has become ubiquitous thanks to extremely low production cost.

With >400m tons output and 600 bn dollar revenues yearly, the plastic industry has grown into one of the biggest sector of the chemical industry.

Polymer research globally shows that interest in this material has never been higher: new polymers, new catalysts, new processes, new properties etc.

B

SOURCE: (1) G. Roland, J. Jambeck, K. Law. 2017, Science advances

Page 26: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2626

There is a newly emerging imperative to keep plastic out of the atmospheric carbon cycle

SOURCE: Material Economics 2018

Cumulative emissions to 2100GtCO2, global, 2015-2100

Projected CO2 emissions from materials Carbon budget to 2100

333

242

228

68

Cumulative materials emissions assuming current

EU level consumption globally

Cement

871

Plastic

Steel

Aluminum

300

2 degree Carbon budget for industry

and energy

850-900

Carbon budget available for

materials

B

Page 27: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2727

Over the last 2 years plastics leakage into eco-systems has been elevated to the global agenda – and starts to reshape the value chain

SOURCE: Ocean Conservancy; Rochman et al., 2013; Davison and Asch, 2011; Jacobsen et al., 2011; Raum-Suryan et al., 2009; Hanni and Pyle, 2000; NOAA; Environmental Investigation Agency

B

Page 28: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2828

The global plastic packaging value chain is starting to move into a major disruption

78 MILLION TONNES (Annual production)

98% VIRGIN FEEDSTOCK

32% LEAKAGE

40% LANDFILLED

14% INCINERATION AND/OR ENERGY RECOVERY

8% CASCARED RECYCLING2

4% PROCESS LOSSES

2% CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING1

1 Closed-loop recycling: Recycling of plastics into the same or similar-quality applications2 Cascaded recycling: Recycling of plastics into other; lower-value applicationsSOURCE: Project Mainstream analysis – for details please refer to Appendix A

B

Page 29: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

2929

The target plastic system – recoupled, looped, high-value

OTHER MATERIAL STREAMS

DESIGN & PRODUCTION USE

RENEWABLY SOURCEDVIRGIN FEEDSTOCK

LEAKAGEENERGY RECOVERY

SOURCE: McKinsey Center for Business and Environment

REUSE

RECYCLINGRadically improved economics & quality

CREATE AN EFFECTIVE AFTER-USE PLASTICS ECONOMY1

DECOUPLE PLASTICS FROM FOSSIL FEEDSTOCKS3 DRASTICALLY REDUCE THE

LEAKAGE OF PLASTICS INTO NATURAL SYSTEMS & OTHER NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES

3

B

Page 30: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3030

Oct 29th 2018 in Bali – 200 businesses commit to 100% recyclability & recycled content, shifting market dynamics

Source: SYSTEMIQ

B

Page 31: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3131

Mechanical vs. feedstock recycling – an emerging competitive battle field

1 Also called ‘solvolysis’SOURCE: De Smet, M. & Linder, M. (Eds.), A circular economy for plastics – Insights from research and innovation to inform policy and funding decisions. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (2019 –forthcoming)

ILLUSTRATIVE

Refining(Feedstock to

monomer)

Polymerisation(chain growth)

Formulation(stabilizers, pig-

ments, additives)

Processing(Molding,

extrusion, etc.)

Packaging(filling) Use

Chemical companies, resin & masterbatch manufacturers

Virgin feedstock

Converters Brands & retailers Users

Reuse

Mechanical recycling

Solvent-based purification1

Depolymerisation

Feedstock recycling

Monomer Polymer Plastic Application Packaged product

When polymer is preserved: Preserved material integrity and value Each reprocessing cycle degrades material Low energy use Few unit operations Few options for material applications

When polymer is broken down: Infinite reprocessing cycles possible Loss of material integrity and value High energy use Multiple unit operations Multiple options for material applications

POLYMER IS BROKEN DOWN

POLYMER IS PRESERVED

B

Page 32: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3232

We are seeing new market entrants developing the feedstock recycling space

SOURCE: Team Analysis; Centi et al. (2017); Butler, E. et al., Waste Biomass Valor. (2011); Richards, T. et al., Feedstock recycling of polymers, RE:Source (2018)

With existing petrochemical infrastructure, the likely outcome is a mix of fuel, polymer and chemical products

Pyrolysis outputs

Gasification outputs

Diesel/oil

Syngas

Solides (waxes, bitumen)

Gasoline/ Kerosene

Naphtha

Light gases Mainly used to produce energy

Reforming

Fuel refining

Methanol synthesis

Ureasynthesis

Steam cracker

Reforming

Fuels returns

To fertiliser production

Fuels

Fuels

Further chemical processing

Products after chemical modification

Ethanol/Propanol

To other chemical production

N2

Ethylene/ Propylene

Dehydrogenation

Polymer synthesis Polymers

AromaticsOther chemicals

B

Page 33: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3333

Hydrogen, biochemistry, carbon capture and circularity represent attractive zero-carbon business development opportunities for refinery players

strategic opportunity for fossil fuel industries

C

Page 34: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3434

Matching Capital

Catalytic Capital Consortium

Potential Anchor Investor

Capital Flow Principal + Interest Payment Wild Forest Products Environmental Service Outcomes

*non-exhaustive

*

*

Auto-motive OEM

REGENERATION could be a central pillar of an industry transition strategy – now explored by the automotive industry

D

REGENERATION

Channels debt financing to scale up proven markets

and commercial operations

Reduces market risk by acting as off-taker of

Environmental Services and Wild Forest Products

Wild Forest Products

Environmental Services

Page 35: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3535

The next 20 years – towards an economy that prospers whilst natural systems thrive

First economy (1820 – 2017)

Second economy (2018 – 2038)

!

+

SOURCE: SYSTEMIQ

!

75 Trillion USD75 Trillion USD

TRANSFORM RETHINK

Page 36: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3636

L A N D U S E

We need a theory of change – for every economic system

B U I L D I N G C O A L I T I O N SEnergy Transitions Commission

Blended Finance Task Force New Plastic Economy

Made_in_Germany_2.0

T R A N S F O R M I N G P I O N E E R SEurope’s Largest Fertilizer Group

World Largest Environmental Service Company Two Oil Majors

Largest Enzyme Producer

I N C U B A T I N G P R O J E C T S A N D C O M P A N I E SBuilding the “Grüner Punkt” in Indonesia

The Uber of Waste STOP

Rebuild

V E N T U R I N GBioCarbon engineering

Electron Upside Energy Open Invest

R E D I R E C T I N G L A R G E - S C A L E C A P I T A LTemasek Blackrock

IFC Green Finance Institute

Open Invest

E N E R G YM A T E R I A L S

Page 37: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3737

Thank you!

[email protected]

[email protected]

Page 38: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3838Source: CIEP (2017), The European Refining Sector: A Diversity of Markets?

Europe's petroleum input and output flow

A challenge to the European refinery industry

Page 39: A Good Disruption · 2019-03-27 · Low product utilization during productive life, e.g. ~2 percent for cars and 35-B. 50 percent for offices. Products only used 9 years on average,

3939

The petrochemical industry has started to explore circular polymer opportunities but there is so much more to explore

Refurbish/remanufacture

Reuse/redistribute

Share

Restore

Virtualise

Maintain

Biochemical feedstock

Cascades

Ecosystem restauration

Biogas

Farming/ collection

Renewables

BiosphereProduct manufacturer

Service provider

Parts manufacturer

Minimise systematic leakage and negative externalities

Collection Collection

Substitute materials

Finite materials

Renewable materials

Consumer User

Recycle

Regenerate

SOURCE: Ellen MacArthur Foundation & SUN (2013)

Waste to ResourcesMixed waste to chemicals• Consortium

Enerkem, AkzoNobel, Air Liquid, City of Rotterdam

• Shell (IH2

Technology)• Various gasification

start-up (Synova, Klean industries)

Bio-based monomer feedstockBio-based chemical• Butamax (butanol from high value crops)• Bioskoh (ethanol from 2nd gen. feedstocks)• First2Run (integrated biorefinery from dry

crops)• Funguschain (chemical and new materials

from mushrooms)

Biogas valorization technologiesBiogas to bio-based biodegradable plastics• Full cycle bioplastic • Mango Materials

Biogas to proteins• StringBio

Innovative biogas technologies• Nexterra (gasification)• Carbonlites (anaerobic

digestion)

Extraction ofbiochemical

feedstock

Mechanical RecyclingCollaborating with large players and smaller innovative start-ups• mtm• Ravago

DepolymerizationPA (at industrial scale)• AquafillPET (scaling)• Demeto• PerPETual

AI empowered chemistry• Citrine• ChemAlive• Sustainalyze

PS (scaling)• Agilyx• Pyrowave

• UBQ• Integrico• MacRebur

Designing recycling friendly materials• Cradle –to-Cradle

methodology• Additive flows

Chemicals a serviceWhat can we learn from other industries?• SafeChem • EcoLab

New sorting technologyEmpowering the recycling industry• Urban mining Corp.• Tomra

Selective extractionAddressing multi-layer packaging• Creasolv• APK recycling• Cleyond

Pyrolysis andrelated technologiesChemical recycling for polyolefins• Plastic Energy• Green Mantra• Recycling Technologies

B