a dvanced h uman r esource m anagement prof. dr. armin trost
TRANSCRIPT
ADVANCED HUMAN
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
2Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
English Versionfor
International Business Management
3Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Overview
Retention
Job Motivation and Satisfaction
Employee Survey
Change Management
Knowledge Management
Social Media
HR Organization and Information Technology
HR Controlling
Retention
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
5Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Retention – Overview
Key terms
Turnover costs
Turnover diagnosis
Turnover prediction
Retention measures
Turnover strategies
6Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Turnover – Definition of Key Terms
TurnoverThe process in which employees leave the organization and have to be replaced
Turnover Rate
Involuntary turnoverTurnover initiated by the organisation (often among people who would prefer to stay).
Voluntary turnoverTurnover initiated by employees
Number of Employees leaving the Company in a Year
Number of Employees at Midyear 100%
7Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Performance Turnover Relation
Performance
Tu
rno
ver
Low Middle High
According to: William and Livingstone (1994). Another look at the relationship between performacne and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 269-298.
Poor Evaluation; small pay raises; poor satisfaction
High mobility, opportunities due to high
labor market value
Average
Average turnover underestimates critical leaves
10%
20%
8Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Turnover Costs
Learning Curve of New Hire
Separation
Lost Productivity of Vacant Position
Vacancy
Marketing
Selection
Hiring
Onboarding
Training
Employee Leaves New EmployeeHired
New EmployeeFully Effective
Lost Productivity of
Other Employees
Lost Productivity of
Other Employees
Hidden („Indirect“) Costs
Lost Productivity of
Other Employees
Source: Corporate Leadership Council (1998). Employee Retention
Visible („Direct“) Costs
Lost Productivity of Incumbant
Pre-Departure Vacancy Introduction
9Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
The Psychological Contract
Regular Pay
Benefits
Social networks
Challenging tasks
Training
Image
Security
Values
Idendity
Networks
Customers
Performance
Creativity
Capabilities
Knowledge
Talent
Energy
Time
Health
Employer Provides Employee provides
10Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Retention Factors
Which of the following factors are most likely to hinder your company’s ability to retain talented employees over the next three years? Select up to three (Answers in %)
The Economist Intelligence Unit 2008 (Responses of 1.000 executives around the globe)
11Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Major Retention Factors for High Potentials
Board Awareness
Professional Networks
Within
Challenging and strategic
Projects
Executive Trust & Support
Freedom to Act
Retention
Competitive Salary
12Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
New Generations require new Ways of Life
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Learn Work Private
13Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Flexible Working Structures
Locationfixed mobile
Timefixed flexible
Structurefixed flexible
Employees go to Work Employees take their Work with them
14Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
The common Approach: Turnover Diagnosis
Usage of scientific methods to systematically answer the question: Who leaves why?
88% of all companies survey by Mercer in 1998 conduct exit surveys and/or exit interviews to capture reasons to leave
While results are always of general interest they hardly provide relevant insights for the business line (e.g. female employees leave the company for different reasons than male employees)
Results taken from turnover diagnosis help companies to undertake strategic measures with regards to employer branding
Turnover diagnosis can be seen as a reactive rather than as a proactive measure
15Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Exit Interview (Example: Intel)
What was the main reason that you decided to leave?
Is your new position in a different line of work than the one you where in while at Intel?
How would you characterize your new employer?
Would you say your new employer is better than Intel, about the same as Intel, or not as good as Intel in terms of:
How would you descibe your relationship with your manager while you where at Intel?
How would you describe your experience with Intel?
If a friend approached you and told you he/she was looking for a similar position at Intel, how likely would you be recommend Intel?
Any other comments about Intel or you new position?
Pay
Benefits
Location
Working Conditions
Job Security
Advancement Opportunities
Product Quality
Coworkers
Company Leadership
Company Image
16Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
A simple Framework to predict Turnover
1 Would you recommend a friend to work at X1?
2 Do you have everything you need to do your job well?
3 Do you enjoy working with your peers and supervisor?
4 Do you seriousely consider leaving X1 within the next 6 months?
Supervisor Quality
Social embedded ness
Capabilities to do a good Job
EmployeeCommitment
Intention to leave/stay Turnover
1
2
3
4
Four strong questions to be asked regularly
1 X = Name of the company in question
17Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Commitment Capability Matrix clearly indicate Supervisor Quality
1 2 3 4 51
2
3
4
5
Low HighCapability
Low
HighC
om
mit
men
t
John Smith
Garth McGrath
Paul Paulson
Mike McGuire
Russ Rothen
Kelley Clark
Mark Myer John Shark
Paul Cummings
Ed Flaw
Rock Stewart Tom Scott
Linda Anderson
Susan Power
Chris Christensen
Keneth Keith Carlson
Pete Peters
18Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Retention Target Groups
LetGo
Re-Recruit
Don‘tCare
TakeCare
Low HighEmployeeValue
High
Low
TurnoverIntention
Impact of Departure
Risk of Departure
19Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Impact of „Cost of Changing Career“
Benefits of staying
with current
employer
Benefits of working at
other employer
Cost of Changing
Career
Cost of Doing
NothingCost of Doing
Nothing
Cost of Change
20Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Turnover Decision Styles
High Involvement Decision MakingSystematically and carefully taking into consideration current employment, alternative employement opportunities, own strength and weaknesses, long-term expectations and private situation
Opportunity Driven Decision MakingUnderestimation of appealing elements of current employment and consistent overestimation of other employment offers even in times of limited pressure
Fleeing from current SituationFeeling that everything is better compared to the status quo. Negatively perceived elements of actual job are main drivers for changing career
Externally Driven Decision MakingEmployment alternatives including the current one are evaluated according to friends‘ and family‘s attitudes and expectations
Job Motivation and Satisfaction
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
22Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Types of Theorie
Content TheoryThese theories attempt to explain those specific things which actually motivate the individual at work
■ Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs■ Job Characterstics Model of Hackman & Oldham■ Herzberg’s Theorie
Process Theory These theories attempt to identify the relationship among the dynamic variables which make up motivation
■ Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
23Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Job Characterstics Model by Hackman & Oldham
Skill Variety
Task Identity
Task Significance
Autonomy
Feedback
ExperiencedMeaningfulness
ExperiencedResponsibility
Knowledgeof Results
Motivation
Performance
Satisfaction
Job Characteristics
PsychologicalStates
Desired Outcomes
The relationship is moderated by thestrength of an employee‘s need for growth
24Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Two Factor-Model by Herzberg
7
18
14
6
11
8
17
3
4
15
20
20
31
11
6
1
41
33
26
23
20
6
15
6
4
4
3
3
3
1
1
1
05101520253035 0 10 20 30 40 50
Achievement
Recognition
The work itself
Responsibility
Advancement/Growth
Self Actualization
Compensation
Subordinate
Status
Supervisor
Colleagues
Leadership
Company Policies
Working Condition
Private
Security
In „bad“ Situations in „good“ Situations
Relative Frequencies of reported eventsM
otivatio
n F
actor
Satisfaction
/No S
atisfaction
Hyg
iene F
actor
Dissatisfaction
/No D
issatisfaction
25Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Expectancy Theory by Vroom
Force – the motivation or the force to show a specific action
Expectancy – the possibility of achieving a certain outcome through certain actions
Valency – the preference an individual has for a particular outcome, the worth placed on a particular result
F = (E V)
V E E x V E E x V
Not loosing face 3 0,9 2,7 0,1 0,3
Health & Safety 8 0,1 0,8 0,5 4,0
Keeping warm 2 0,8 1,6 0,4 0,8
Success story 4 0,6 2,4 0,2 0,8
Force 7,5 5,9
Jump Don't Jumb
26Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Types of Job SatisfactioinBy Bruggemann
Vergleich Soll - Ist
ProgessiveZufriedenheit
StabilisierteZufriedenheit
ResignativeZufriedenheit
Pseudo-Zufriedenheit
FixierteUnzufriedenheit
KonstruktiveUnzufriedenheit
Verfälschung der Situations-wahrnehmung
Ohne neue Problem-lösungs-versuche
Neue Problem-lösungs-versuche
Senkung des Anspruchs-
niveaus
Beibehaltung des Anspruchs-
niveaus
Erhöhung des Anspruchs-
niveaus
Beibehaltung des Anspruchs-
niveaus
StabilisierendeZufriedenheit
DiffuseUnzufriedenheit
27Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
McGregor’s Theory X and Y
Theory X
The average person is lazy and has an inherent dislike of work
Most people must be coerced, controlled, directed and threatened with punishment if the organization is to achieve its objectives
The average person avoids responsibility, prefers to be directed, lacks ambition and values security most of all
Theory Y
For most people work is as natural as play or rest
People will exercise self-direction and self-control in the service of objectives to which they are committed
Commitment to objectives is a function of rewards associated with their achievement
Given the right conditions the average worker can learn to accept and to seek responsibility
Employee Survey
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
29Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Employee Survey – Overview
Purpose and approaches
Employee survey operation
Commonly used content
Result interpretation
Limitations of traditional employee surveys
Strategic employee survey
30Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Employee Survey Objectives
II
Identification fo strengths and weaknesses
Evaluation of former actions
Induction of discussion and initiatives
I
Insights into naturally hidden subjects
– Employee Satisfaction
– Corporate climate, culture, values
– Commitment and capabilities related to strategic challenges
– …
III
Improvements
– Working conditions– Productivity– Employee retention– Culture– Meeting strategic
goals– …
31Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Employee Surveys can adress the Needs of different Clients
Top-Management
Middle Management
Employees
Internal Service Provider
32Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Survey-Feedback
SurveySurvey
Analysis and Reporting
Analysis and Reporting
Feedback Results to all Employees
Feedback Results to all Employees
Problem Identification and
Action Setup
Problem Identification and
Action Setup
Improvement Activitiy
Improvement Activitiy
33Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Survey Follow-Up
Employee Survey Project Steps
Survey Administration
Survey Administration
Report GenerationReport Generation
Feedback/Communication
Feedback/Communication
Action PlanningAction Planning
ImplementationImplementation
EvaluationEvaluation
Preparation
Project Planning & Setup
Project Planning & Setup
PrestudyPrestudy
Survey Development
Survey Development
Prior Communication
Prior Communication
34Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Survey Development
Topics
Indicator
Questions
Pretest
Operation & Evaluation
Adjustment
35Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
During the past year, have you been bothered by pain in your abdomen?
36Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Q12 (Gallup)
1. I know what is expected of me at work
2. I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right
3. At work, I have the opportunity to do what I do best every day
4. In the last seven days, I have
received recognition and praise for doing good work
5. My supervisor, or someone at work, seems to care about
me as a person
6. There is someone at work who encourages my development
7. At work, my opinions seem to count
8. The mission/purpose of my company makes me feel my job is important
9. My associates (fellow employees) are committed to
doing quality work
10. I have a best friend at work
11. In the last six months, someone at work has talked to me about my progress
12.This last year, I have had opportunities at work to learn
and grow
37Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
A Typical Way to Present Results
Frequencies (%)
N Averagestrongly agree
agreepartly-partly
dis-agree
stronglydisagree
1 2 3 4 5
Sales Germany 35 36 29 45 2,92 12 23 36 19 10
Global Sales Organization
48 28 24 287 2,63 19 29 28 18 6
I have the materials and equipment I need to do my work right
35
48
36
28
29
24
38Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Survey Results (Example)
1,7
2
2,3
1,4
2,3
2,8
2,5
2
3,1
2,5
1,7
2,8
1,6
1,5
2,6
1,6
2,1
2,8
2,4
1,8
3,2
2,6
1,8
2,2
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5 4 4,5 5
Region South-West
Germany
Tasks and Duties
Work Environment
Empowerment
Colleagues
Direct Supervisor
Communication
Work Flexibility
Work-Life-Balance
Compensation
Benefits
Commitment
Career Development
Region South-West (32 Employees) is part of Germany (186 Employees)
1 = Best possible result; 5 = worst possible result
39Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Ways to interpret results
AbsoluteMeans and frequencies of answers related to different items are absolutely compared. The more negative the results by absolut means the bigger the issue
RelativeResults are compared to internal and/or external standards or benchmarks. In most cases results of superior unit are used
LongitudinalCurrent results are compared to results of previous surveys
ObjectivesResults are compared with predefined expectations (objectives)
40Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Rules in Follow-up Processes
All employees get all results of the survey
Feedback of results follows a top-downn approach from to top-management to every single team
All teams get their own results compared to the results of the superior organisational units
Issue, which lay beyond an organizational unit‘s respnsibility will be escalated to the unit on the next level
41Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Shortcomings of Traditional Employee Survey Approaches
Surveys are isolated events not integrated into regular leadership processes
Not every topic is relevant for everybody on every hierarchy level
Objectives are defined after the survey has been conducted based on survey results. But, surveys can‘t change priorities
Required budgets for improvement activities are not defined. Therefore planned actions lead to minimal impact
Focus on satisfaction – missing linkage to business drivers and results
Tremendous efforts through intense reporting and follow-up processes
Comparison with benchmarks means taking the mediocre as standard
42Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Satisfaction versus Strategy
Factors driving competititiveness
Business Indicators
Factors driving employees‘ satisfaction and performance based on a scientific model
Topics
Top-Management Employees, Managers, Internal Service Units
Stakeholder
(Customer)
Results are natural part of top-management agenda and decision making
Objectives are set in advance to the survey
Units on all levels are encouraged to work with results and draw conclusions
Objectives are set after the survey
Follow-up
Up to every month Every 1 to 5 yearsCycle
Random samples, panels, high-potentials
Every employeeParticipants
Pulse Survey Traditional Approach
43Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Commitment & Capabilities related to Strategy X
44Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
high
low
low high
Commitment
Capability
high
low
low high
Commitment
Capability
Garth McGrath
Cost Reduction Cost Reduction
Innovation Innovation
SAP Implementation SAP Implementation
Service Quality Service Quality
Garth McGrath Garth McGrath
Innovation
Russ Rothen Russ Rothen
Pete Peters Pete Peters
Kelley Clark Kelley Clark
John Shark John Shark
Ed Flaw Ed Flaw
Schulze-Pübbelkamp Schulze-Pübbelkamp
Mark Myer Mark Myer
Commitment Capability Grid – Example
Change Management
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
46Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Overview
Large-Scale transformations and related humanreactions and challenges
Change Management – definition and framework
Sponsorship and commitment
Program organization
Employee communication and involvement
47Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Types of large-scale Transformations
ReengineeringChanging the way people work
RestructuringChanging roles and responsibilities of people
Mergers & acquisitionsChanging entire groups of people
Strategic changeChanging the direction of people‘s work
Cultural changeChanging people‘s attitutes, values and beliefs
48Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Response to Disruptive Changes
Time
Immobilization
Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Testing
Acceptance
Emotional Response
Passive
Active
Stability
According to Kübler-Ross: On Death and Dying (1967)
49Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Resistance to Change
Resistance is a natural human reaction ondisruptive events (fear of loosing control)
Change is seen by different people differentlyaccording to their individual frames of reference
Resistant employees are often seen as notrationally thinking troublemakers
Resistance of informal thought leaders are ofgreater power than those of formal leaders
There is always a mixture of overt and hidden resistance. Overt resistance should be a valuable aspect of any change process
Active involvement is propably the best way todeal with resistance
50Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Response to Positive Change
Time
Pessimism(Perceived Complexity)
Uninformed Optimism (Naivité)
Informed Pessimism
Informed Optimism
Completion
According to: Conner: Managing at the Speed of Change
Checking Out (?)
Level of Tolerance
Hopeful Realism
51Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Why Transformation fail(Kotter, 1995)
Not establishing a great enough sense of urgency
Not creating a powerful enough guiding coalition
Lacking a vision
Undercommunicating the vision
Not removing obstacles to the new vision
Not systematically planning for and creating short-term wins
Declaring victory too soon
Not anchoring changes in the corporate culture
52Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Sources of Complacency
ComplacencyComplacency
Too much happy talk from senior
managementA kill-the-messenger-of-bad-
news, low-confrontation culture
Human nature, with its capacity for denial,
especially if people are already busy or stressed
The absence of a major and visible
crisis
Organizational structures that focus employees on narrow functional goals
Low overall performance
standards
Too many visible
resources
A lack of sufficient performance feedback from external sources
Infernal measurement systems that focus on
the wrong performance indexes
Source: John Kotter (1996): Leading Change
53Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
People-related Challenges a any Transformation
Do the people …
understand what the change is about?
agree, that the change is necessary?
see the impact on their daily work?
have required capabilities for the new situation?
get support to make the change happen?
benefit from newly expected behaviours?
54Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
SupportFunctions
ManagementFunctions
Change Management Framework
Initialization
Setup
Design
Change
Stabilization
Sponsorship/CommitmentSponsorship/Commitment
OrganizationOrganization
ControllingControlling
HRM IntegrationHRM Integration
CommunicationCommunication
Training & Support
Training & Support
StakeholderInvolvementStakeholderInvolvement
Scope & Vision
55Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Levels of Support
Time
Ch
ang
e S
up
po
rt
Attention
Understanding
Acceptance
Commitmentvisible, rationale und emotional
Investmentpersonally, financially, timely
SponsorshipLongterm support
No Idea
Sponsorship/Commitment
Acceptance
Preparation
According to: Daryl Conner: Managing at the Speed of Change (1992)
56Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Roles in a Change Program 1/2
Sponsors– Have the power to sanction and legitimize change and
to make decisions about change– Create an environment that inables change to be made
on time and within budget– The sponsors make up the steering group
Change Agents– Responsible for making the change happen on an
operational local level– They directly deal with employees and managers,
which are impacted by the change (targets)
Target– The group who must actually change attitudes and
behaviour
57Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Roles in a Change Program 2/2
Project Team– Operationally drives the entire change program
– The project team is led by the project lead, who isresponsible for the overall success of the program
– The project team reports to the steering group
Sounding Board– Key-players with a good sense of the company‘s culture and
the actual mindset of the employees
– Provide feedback to the project team about acceptance andresistance on side of the target
External Advisors– Give advice to the project team from a neutral standpoint
58Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Target
Typical Organizational Structure
Steering Group
Project TeamProject Lead
Sponsor
External Advisor
Project Lead (Consulting)
Partner
CA
SB
SB
LM
MA
MA
CA
SB
CA
Sounding Board
SB
ChangeAgent
LM
Line Manager
59Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Relationships between different Roles
SponsorSponsor
AgentAgent
TargetTarget
Linear Structure
SponsorSponsor
AgentAgent
TargetTarget
Triangular Structure
SponsorSponsor
AgentAgent
TargetTarget
Square Structure
SponsorSponsor
Source: Daryl Conner: Managing at the Speed of Change (1992)
60Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
PositioningWhat do you do for whom why?
What‘s the problem (in terms of figures)?
Who has the problem?
What does the problem cost if not solved?
What‘s the solution?
What will be the difference after the solution hasbeen implemented successfully?
What are the costs of the solution?
61Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Communication Measures
Employee Newspaper E-Mail Newsletter
(Meassage from the CEO) Intranet
(with F&Qs) Town Hall Meeting
Available Media
New Media
On
e-d
irec
tio
n Interactive
efficient
effective
Broschures
Posters
Videos, webcasts
PPT-Presentations
Intranet, Social Media(with forums and chatrooms)
Departmentmeetings
Individual employee meetings
Open Space Events
„Ask-the-CEO“-Meetings
Workshops, Conferences
Hotline
62Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Communication Strategy
When?
Who informs – CEO, HR ..?
How – Media usage?
What is the message?
Why – What to achieve with communication?
Whom?
63Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
The Communication Dilemma
Time, Progress
Unsecurity/Need for Information
ClarityHigh
Low
EarlyCommunikation
LateCommunikation?
64Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Employee Involvement
Open SpaceInvolvement of many people in a one to two days event, where no content is predefined. The event is srongly facilitated
Focus GroupsGroups of selected employees (capable, ambitious, highlyaccepted) work on solutions regarding clearly definedissues
Sounding BoardsMembers of the target group provide regular feedback toprogramm plans and directions and how people react
Employee SurveysEmployees are asked for their opinions individually or ingroups by using quantitative or qualitative data collectionsmethods
Nominating thought leaders into the programorganization
65Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Open Space (Bar Camp)
Up to 1000 participants
Participants determine content to be discussed
Major objectives are:– Involvement of many people in a
short period of time– Collective motivation and
commitment– Identification and prioritization of
issues
Intense and strong facilitationthough facilitator andtechniques
Work in groups with rotatingconstitutions
Public presentations of results
Duration is between 2 to 3days
66Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Stakeholder Analysis
Impact
Power
strong
weak
low high
Resistance
Support
Knowledge Management
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
68Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Knowledge Management – Overview
Knowledge Economy
From Sign to Wisdom
Traditional Approaches in Knowledge Management
Implicit versus explicit Knowledge
Modern Approaches in Knowledge Management
69Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
The changing meaning of Knowledge
70Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Challenges
Employees‘ knowledge as key factor for competitiveness and corporate success (knowledge economy)
Complex tasks require combination of the knowledge of multiple players
New and relevant knowledge appears in increasingly shorter time periods
Knowledge is located in people‘s mind and hard to be retained to the company (knowledge worker)
Growing need to collect and transfer knowledge across the globe
71Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
People versus Technology
People who own their knowledge
Subjectivity and creativity
Significant corporate value
Hard to be retained
Data
Information
Knowledge
Wisdom
Technology (e.g. data bases)
Objektivity through documentation
Limited corporate value
Information and data are owned by the company
72Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
From Signs to Competitiveness
+Syntax
Data+Meaning
Information+Combination
Knowledge+Task related
Capability+Commitment
Action+Doing the right things
Competence+Unique/Different
Competitive-ness
Signs
IT
Solutions
Knowledge Organization
Knowledge Leadership
Source: Klaus North: Wissensorientierte Unternehmensführung, Gabler Verlag (own translation)
73Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
What people know
ProductsProducts CustomersCustomers
ProcessesProcesses
PartnersPartners
Tools/Technology
Tools/Technology
CompetitionCompetition
(Informal) Networks
(Informal) Networks ProjectsProjects
SolutionsSolutions
MistakesMistakes
Peers/organization
Peers/organization
CultureCulture
(Hidden)Rules
(Hidden)Rules
74Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Classic #1: Central Knowledge Database
Employees are encouraged to document their knowledge on a central database
A facilitator takes care for quality of all documents
There are general standards for creating knowledge material
Downside
Employees neither are motivated enough to document their knowledge nor find enough time to do so
Within a short period of time masses of never used documents emerge
75Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Classic #2: Yellow Pages
Employee maintain and commend their major fields of expertise in a few words
All employees find peers with certain expertise using simple search options
Expertise is documented on databases with web-access or on printed booklets
Overall goal is to bring people with certain expertise and demand for expertise together
Downside
Detailed meaning of expertise remains unclear
Limited opportunity to immediately learn from what is documented
76Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Knowledge Generation Modelby Nonaka
Tacit Tacit
Socialisation
Tacit Tacit
SocialisationTacit Explicit
Externalisation
Tacit Explicit
Externalisation
Explicit Tacit
Internalisation
Explicit Tacit
InternalisationExplicit Explicit
Combination
Explicit Explicit
Combination
Source: Nonaka & Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company
77Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Implicit Knowledge – Example
Source: Gerd Gigerenzer (2007). Bauchentscheidungen
78Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
McKinsey Approach
Employees publish specific knowledge through webbased documents not longer than three pages
Knowledge must have been proven in practise
Access to documents is tracked and reported. Reader evaluate the value of documents
Employees are encouraged to commend on documents and to get in direct touch with experts (authors)
Rankings are published and constantly updated about the success of all documents
79Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Knowledge Transfer Process
Knowledge
EmployeeProject Lead/
Manager
1. Knowledge Documentation
Project
2. Search for Expertise
3. Contacting
4. Cooperation/Support
5. Knowledge development/Enhanced Network
80Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
T-Concept
Focus on one field of expertise
Personal commitment to enhance knowledge within that field and to proactively support colleagues where required
Commitment to publish new insights
Doing presentations on internal knowledge transfer conferences and training events
Experts are communicated internally
General Knowledge
Expert-Knowledge
HR Organization & Information Systems
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
82Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
HR Organization and Information Systems –Overview
Global Human Resource Management
HR as Strategic Business Partner
Roles in a global HR Organization
Shared Service Center
HR Outsourcing
HR Information Systems
Focus: e-Recruiting
83Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Global Organizational Landscape
Global HeadquarterCorporate HR managing HR globally;
Regional HR managing regional HR;
Local HR serving Headquarter Staff
SubsidiaryLocal HR serving Subsidiary Staff
Regional HeadquarterRegional HR managing regional HR;
Local HR serving Subsidiary Staff
84Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Types of Organizations
Global
Views the world as a single market; operations are
controlled centrally from the corporate office.
Global
Views the world as a single market; operations are
controlled centrally from the corporate office.
Transnational
Specialized facilities permit local responsiveness; complex coordination mechanisms provide
global integration.
Transnational
Specialized facilities permit local responsiveness; complex coordination mechanisms provide
global integration.
Multinational
Several subsidiaries operating as stand-alone business units in multiple
countries.
Multinational
Several subsidiaries operating as stand-alone business units in multiple
countries.
International
Uses existing capabilities to expand into foreign
markets.
International
Uses existing capabilities to expand into foreign
markets.
Low High
Glo
bal
Eff
icie
ncy
Lo
wH
igh
Local Responsiveness
85Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Perceived Strength and Interests from two Perspectives
“We are more familiar with operational requirements and practices”
“We know our customers better”
“We need our freedom to decide what’s good for our local customers”
“We expect responsibilities to design our own processes and tools”
“It’s all different in our country”
“We are closer to senior management”
“We know better what’s good for the company as a whole”
“We are more familiar with the differences across countries”
“We have the power to decide about strategic directions”
Locally operating HR employee
Globally acting HR employee
86Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Trends in Human Resource Management Responsibilities
Administration
Support
Consulting
Strategy
?
87Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
HR Roles by Dave Ulrich
Strategy
Operation
Processes People
Strategic Partner
Defining and executing strategy
Change Agent
Creating a renewed organization
Administrative Expert
Building an efficient infrastructure
Employee Champion
Increasing employee commitment and
capability
Source: Dave Ulrich: Human Resource Champions 1997
88Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Filtering Queries
SelfService
WEB
Service Center / Call Center
HR Generalist
HR Manager
SE
RV
ER
75 20 5
100Queries
Intranet
Internet
Source: Accenture
Database
89Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Screenshot „Abwesenheitsmitteilung“
90Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Virtual Advisor (Lingubot)
http://www.daad.de/deutschland/en/index.html
91Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Shared Service Center
Corporate Functions
Divisional Units
Board
internal external
External Partner
HR
HR
HR
HRHRHR
HR
HR-Shared- Service
HRHR
92Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Economies of Scale and Scope through Shared Service Organization
Economies of Scale
Combination of similar Processes
Economies of Scope
Co
sts/
Un
it
Volume
Joint Usage of Resources
t0
t1
Co
sts/
nit
C1
C2
Q2 Q1 Shared
Shared
Volume
t0
t1
decentral
S1
t0
t1
Uti
liza
tio
n
Time
consolidated
S2
Economies of Scale through
Decreasing redundancies
Standardization of IT/HR processes
Learning
Economies of Scope through
Combination of resources and infrastructures
Leveling utilization and capacities
93Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Decentralized Recruiting Organization
Applicant
Branch
A
Preselection
Assessment
Applicationmanagement
Job OfferPreparation
HRMarketing
Job OfferNegotiation
Branch
B
Preselection
Assessment
Applicationmanagement
Job OfferPreparation
HRMarketing
Job OfferNegotiation
ApplicationData Base
ApplicationData Base
Definition of Target Profile
Introduction
Definition of Target Profile
Introduction
94Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Identifying Duties to be Transferred into a Shared Recruiting Center
Ability to Standardize
Relationshipto Candidate
high low
distant
close
Recording unsolicited Applications in the System
Arranging Interviews
Conducting Interviews
Pre-Selecting Cand.
Writing Job Offers
Maintaining Candidate Information
Feeding back to Candidate
Searching in the Talent Pool
Publishing Job-Postings online
Negotiating Work Contract
95Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Integrated Recruiting Organization with centralized e-Recruiting Technology
Applicant
Branch
A Assessment
Branch
B Assessment
Job Offer Negotiation
Shared Recruiting
Center
Applicationmanagement
Job OfferPreparation
HRmarketing
e-Recruiting
Job Offer Negotiation
Pre-Selection
Definition of Target Profile
Introduction
Definition of Target Profile
Introduction
96Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Central Coordination
Partner-/Supplier Management
Modernd HR-Organization
Employees
Applicants
Customers
Managers
HR Business Partnernear to business
Individual support of managers on HR-
related topics
Shared Service Centercompany wide
Delivery of standardized and regularly demanded services to all employees with
high volume (e.g. payroll)
IT
Hotline
ESS
MSS
Center of Expertisecompany wide
Dealing with complex HR-related Issues
97Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Outsourcing Purposes
CostCost
FocusFocus FlexibilityFlexibility
QualityQuality
98Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Scope of Serices outsourced in the United States
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Source: SHRM 2004 Human Resource Outsourcing Survey Report
…partially
…completely
Relative Frequency (in %)
Health Care
Pension Benefits Admin
Payroll
Recruitment (/wo Mgr)
Relocation
HR Development
Management Development
Compensation Admin
HR Technology
Mobility/Expatriates
Performance Management
99Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Top Factors in Considering HR Outsourcing Vendors
A proven track record
Cost of vendor services
Guaranteed service levels
Flexible contract options
Recommendations from other comp.
A compatible corporate culture
Niche in a specific area
89%
82%
64%
53%
41%
40%
38%
Source: SHRM 2004 Human Resource Outsourcing Survey Report
(n=168 HR Professionals in Companies that currently outsource)
100Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Internal versus external Recruiting-Expertise depend on Positions to be filled
ExecutivesKey FunctionsNon-critical Functions
External Internal
External
Internal External
Internal
Exp
erti
se
101Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
HR Information SystemExample SAP HCM
102Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
User and Expert Systems
103Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Expert System User Interface
104Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Services can be classified according to the Type of Users and Tasks
EmployeesRare usage
Event-triggered
No training efforts
ExpertsFrequent usage
Limited to intense training efforts
AdministrationStandardized processing
Automatization
Reliable results
Value CreationCreative usage
Personal judgements
Fuzzy output
Master data management
Leave request
Online-Application
Training booking
Employee-/Self-Assessment
Knowledge Management
Performance Management
Payroll
Accounting
Application screening
Training administration
Talent Relationship Management
Succession planning
HR Controlling
User
Task
* Inclusing applicants, managers etc.
105Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
User and Expert Systems Usage
Decentral CentralCentralizationDecentralization
Employees
HR
ExpertSystems
User
UserSystems
106Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
e-Recruiting Innovation Waves
Innovators
Early Adaptors
Early Majority
Late Majority
Laggards
WebsiteOnline-
ApplicationBackend/
Integration
200520001995 2010 2015
107Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Typical e-Recruiting functionalities
Search request creation, approval and maintenance
Job-posting on copmany career website and on public job boards
Applicant portal supporting job search, registration and online-application
Application screening and filtering based on selection criteria
Automatic communication with candidates via e-mail
Creation and approval of short-lists through line managers
Interview administration and invitation
108Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Learning Management System (e-Learning)
Lerner Portalpersonalized & intranet-based
LMSLearning Management
System
CMSContent Management
System
ExternalContent
Qualifications
Role
Personalized Training Offers
Learning History
Collaboration
Tests
Training Administration
Learning Strategies
Profile-Matching
Tests & Certificates
Authorization & Accounting
Analytics
Learning Content
Generation
Embedding external Content
Formal Standards
Authorization
Literature Databases
Company Information
Relevant Websites
Communities of Practice
Social Media
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
110Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media – Overview
Social Media User and Usage
Recruiting und Employer Branding
Learning and Development
Social Media Platforms
Internal Social Media Policies
111Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Forrester Ladders
CreatorsWrite blogs, upload videos, generate content used by others
CriticsReact on others‘ content, edit wikis, engage in forums
CollectorsCollect and sort internet content actively, use tags and RSS, evaluate content
JoinersMaintain relations to others
SpectatorsPasively use web content
InactivesDon‘t use content generated by others
112Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media Activity
Source: http://www.forrester.com/empowered/tool_consumer.html (01.12.2010)US: Forrester Research's North American Technographics® Online Benchmark Survey, Q2 2010 (US), 26,913 respondentsEurope: Forrester Research's European Technographics® Benchmark Survey, Q2 2010, 25,535
113Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media User Types in Employer Branding
Me tooMe too
Spontaneousely share career-
related information and content
Be there
Spontaneousely share career-
related information and content
Be there
Maturity
CommunicatorCommunicator
Intensively share career-related
information in any situation
Be present
Intensively share career-related
information in any situation
Be present
Brand BuilderBrand Builder
Transfer a clear employee value
proposition
Clear employer profile
Transfer a clear employee value
proposition
Clear employer profile
NetworkerNetworker
Actively build networks into relevant target
groups
Reach target group
Actively build networks into relevant target
groups
Reach target group
114Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media/Web 2.0 Platform Usage
Employer Branding
Repu-tation
Carreer-info
Job-Posting
Inter-action
Talent Search
TRM
Blogs
Forums
115Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media RoadmapWay to a Social Media Strategy for Recruiting and Employer Branding
ObjectivesObjectives
Definition of Key and Bottleneck
Functions
Target Group Identification
Setting Social Media Objectives
Definition of Key and Bottleneck
Functions
Target Group Identification
Setting Social Media Objectives
ListenListen
Involve and understand target
group
Consider internal conditions
Involve and understand target
group
Consider internal conditions
Do itDo it
Definition & action on Social Media Activities
Employer Branding
Sourcing
Talent Relationship Management
Clarify rules and responsibilities
Definition & action on Social Media Activities
Employer Branding
Sourcing
Talent Relationship Management
Clarify rules and responsibilities
Check and Develop
Check and Develop
Constantly check effects of Social Media Activities
Set priorities and develop selected
Social Media Activities
Constantly check effects of Social Media Activities
Set priorities and develop selected
Social Media Activities
116Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
MediumMedium
IncidentIncident
Witness Tweet Follower Follower‘
JournalistJournalistIncidentIncident
ReaderWitness Interview Article
EditorEditor
Text
Time
Time
117Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Elements of a Twitter Strategy
How will the twitter account be positioned and what will be the relevant content
Who are the target groups?
Who are relevant multiplicators (Follower)?
How will the twitter account be marketed/sold?
What are measurable objectives?
Who/which person will represent the twitter account?
Who decide upon the shared content?
118Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Key Terms of Social Network Analysis
Nodes, Relations,
Density, Centrality, Cliques, Clusters, Stars
119Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Career Cluster versus Professional Cluster
Career ClusterCareer Cluster Professional ClusterProfessional Cluster
Purpose is to share career-related contentPurpose is to share
career-related contentPurpose is to share professional contentPurpose is to share professional content
High CentralityHigh Centrality Little CentralityLittle Centrality
Active CandidatesActive Candidates Active und passive CandidatesActive und passive Candidates
Access through HRAccess through HR Access through the lineAccess through the line
Passive approachPassive approach Active approachActive approach
120Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Learning on Demand
Yellow Pages
Wiki, Blogs
Off-the-Job Training
Social Expert Communites
Literature
Education Offerings
YouTube Tutorials
Simulations
Peers
Direct Manager
Podcasts
iTunes U
Conferences
Micro-Blogging
Yammer
Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice
121Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Formal versus informal Learning
20%20%
Budget
80%80%
Effect
Formel Learning
Informal Learning
80%80%
20%20%
Cross, J. (2006). Informal Learning: Rediscovering the Natural Pathways That Inspire Innovation and Performance. San Francisco/CA: John Wiley.
122Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
YouTube Tutorials
123Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Audio and Video Podcasts
Easy to produce and share with others
Flexible usage anywhere at any time
Short duration
Direct access through mobile Internet
Usage of gadgets (Smartphones)
124Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Principals of informal Learning
Learning content is easily produced, shared and found via Web 2.0 (e.g. YouTube)
Flexible and problem-related usage of content („Learning-on-Demand“ instead of „Learning- just-in-case“)
Learning from others (peers) through Social Media und Communities of Practice
Room and infrastructures allow self-directed learning and knowledge exchange
125Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Internal Talent Markets
TalentsTalents
Experiences
Projects
Expectations
Preferences
References
Experiences
Projects
Expectations
Preferences
References
Jobs & ProjekteJobs & Projekte
Requirements
Challenges
Objectives
Working Conditions
References
Requirements
Challenges
Objectives
Working Conditions
References
According to: Bryan, L., Joyce, C., & Weiss, L. (2006). Making a Market in Talent. McKinsey Quarterly.
HR ConsultantHR Consultant
RulesRules
Internal notice periods
Roles and views
Compensation rules
Internal notice periods
Roles and views
Compensation rules
126Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Social Media Policy at Yahoo!Personal Blog Guidelines
Legal Parameters– Legal Liability. When you choose to go public with your
opinions via a blog, you are legally responsible for your commentary. (..)
– Company Privileged Information. Any confidential, proprietary, or trade secret information is obviously off-limits for your blog per the Proprietary Information Agreement you have signed with Yahoo!.
– Press Inquiries. (..) If a member of the media contacts you about a Yahoo!-related blog posting or requests Yahoo! information of any kind, contact PR.
Best Practice Guideline– Be Respectful of Your Colleagues
– Get Your Facts Straight– Povide Context to Your Argument.– Engage in Private Feedback.
HR Controlling
Prof. Dr. Armin Trost
128Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
HR Controlling – Overview
Purpose of HR Controlling
Important indicators in HR
Performance indicator positioning and implementation
ROI of HR investments
129Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Purposes of HR Controlling
Current Situation
FutureSituation
Past investment
Diagnosis PrognosisEvaluation
130Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Indicators in HRM
Employer Branding– % Awareness– # Applications– Reasons to apply– Employer image
Recruiting– Time-to-fill– Cost per Hire– Offer-Acceptance-Rate– Interviews per Hire– New Hire Satisfaction– Hiring Manager
Satisfaction– No-show-Rate
Workforce Structure– Age– Gender– Span of controll– Tenure– % Freelancers– % Female Leaders
Expatriation– # Expatriates– Return-Rate
131Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Indicators in HRM
Training– Training days/employee– Training costs/employee– Training quality
Development– # High Potentials– HiPos ready for promotion– Duration on one level
HR-related costs– Salary/Total costs– Salary/employee– Compensation structure
Productivity– Revenue/employee– Human Capital Value
Added– Verbesserungs-
vorschläge/Mitarbeiter– Employee satisfaction– Commitment
Retention/Safety– Turnover Rate– HiPo Turnover– Boomerang-Rate– Bradford Factor (SxSxD)– # Accidents/
1000 Employees
132Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Classic #1: Cost-per-Hire
Advertising costs
Candidates‘ travel costs
Executive search retainer and contingency fee
Selection tools and measures
Salary of employees involved in recruiting (HR, Line)
Costs for facilities of the recruiting organization
Market Research
Opportunity costs related to involved line employees
Costs of recruiting infrastructure (e.g. e-Recruiting)
Referral bonuses
HR Marketing events
Sign-on-bonuses
Relocation costs
Onboarding costs
Which components make up cost-per-hire and how is cost per hire divided through organizational units involved and new employees?
133Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Cost Elements – Case
AdvertisingAdvertising
Job ads (e.g. in newspapers); Postings in job boards;
Website/Homepage modifications;Marketing material; Image
campaigns
Job ads (e.g. in newspapers); Postings in job boards;
Website/Homepage modifications;Marketing material; Image
campaigns
EventsEvents
Job fairs; College recruiting; Direct mailings; Open days at SAP;
Company visits; Inhouse eventsImage Reports; Labor Market
Research etc.
Job fairs; College recruiting; Direct mailings; Open days at SAP;
Company visits; Inhouse eventsImage Reports; Labor Market
Research etc.
Search AgenciesSearch Agencies
Executive search; Retained search; Contingency search; Direct source
providers; Contractors
Executive search; Retained search; Contingency search; Direct source
providers; Contractors
Referral BonusesReferral Bonuses
Employee Referrals; Candidate Referrals
Employee Referrals; Candidate Referrals
TravelTravel
Travel costs of recruiters and/or candidates
Travel costs of recruiters and/or candidates
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment centers; reference/background investigation;
Assessment tools; tests
Assessment centers; reference/background investigation;
Assessment tools; tests
RelocationRelocation
Estate agents; Removal firms; Visa / Work Permit Application;
Relocation services; Tax service; Temporary housing; Rental car;
Language training
Estate agents; Removal firms; Visa / Work Permit Application;
Relocation services; Tax service; Temporary housing; Rental car;
Language training
Sign on BonusesSign on Bonuses
Operating CostsOperating Costs
Recruiters payroll and trainings; Applicant tracking systems;
Infrastructure costs; IT support; Office costs; Communication costs
Recruiters payroll and trainings; Applicant tracking systems;
Infrastructure costs; IT support; Office costs; Communication costs
Exlusively Recruiting(special accounts)
Related to Recruiting(e.g. cost centers)
134Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
?
Classic #2: Time-to-Fill
When does it start? When does it end?
WorkforceDemand
Start HRMarketing/
Search
Signed JobOffer
End ofOnboarding
Vacancy Selection First Day at Work
End of Probation
Period
?
135Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Performance Indicator Positioning
What?Which Indicator?
For whom?Who benefits
from the indicator?
Why?To which objectives
is the indicator related?
How?Which sources and methods are used to collect the data when?
136Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
BalancedScorecard
Source: Robert Kaplan and David Norton, “Strategic Learning and the Balanced Scorecard, 1996
Financials
Objective KPI
People
Objective KPI
Customer
Objective KPI
Processes
Objective KPI
Vision &Strategy
137Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Performance Indicator Framework
ClientCEO, HR Head, Manager
Objectives
ObjectEmployee, Org. Unit, HR Function
Topic
FunctionDiagnosis, Prognosis, Evaluation
Positioning
MethodSurvey, Statistics
SourcePeople, Systems
OwnerDecentral/central, HR Controlling
Timing
Operation
ReportingOnline/ Paper, Views, Roles
TrainingInterpretation, Presentation, Usage
UsageAction planning, tracking, monitoring
Usage
138Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Implementing an HR Controlling SystemExample: Turnover Early Warning
Definition of Scope/Objectives
Definition of client, objectives and function
Setting budgests, timeline and project structure
Approach definition
Analysis
Systematic analysis of turnover reasons and possible early indicators
Develpment of a model to explain and predict turnover behavior
Method Definition
Definition of methods and tools to track/measure turnover drivers and predictors
Defining ways to analyse and report data and results
Implementation
Development and installation of controlling system and related technical infrastructure
Identification and training of employees (clients) impacted
Operation
Tracking data and report to clients
Data usage and related actions
Evaluation
Determination of validity and acceptance
Defining fields for improvements
Meeting with client/steering group and project lead
Interviews with managers, former employees, experts
Workshop with experts, clients and HR managers
Validation study interviews with client, user tracking
139Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Traditional ways to evaluate Investments in HRM
Investment Costs Objectives Success Indicators
Management development program (200 participants)
1.000 k€ Improvement of customer and market orientation
Higher customer satisfaction
Responses to the training by the participants
Customer satisfaction
Employee survey (20.000 employees)
1.000 k€ Improvements of employee satisfaction, working conditions and processes
Response rate
Amount of defined actions as result to the survey
Implementation of a performance management system (5.000 employees)
1.000 k€ Performance improvements
Better linkage between operational work and strategic directions
Relative amount of performance management meetings
Responses of managers and employees
140Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Return on Investment (ROI)
ROI = 100%Benefit - Costs
Costs
Time
Operating Costs
Investment
Cummulated Benefits
Cummulated Costs
Start Operation
Profit
Break-Even
Project start
ROI
141Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
From Problem to ROI
Problem
Cost of doing nothing
Solution
Cost of solution
Impact of solution
ROI
142Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
P&B40
OE160
P&B180
OE20
R220
R220
Döner Shop Design Office
Human Capital Value Added (HCVA)
FTE = 1 FTE = 1
220 – 160
1= 60
220 – 20
1= 200
Human Capital Return on Investment (HCROI)
220 – 160
40= 1,50
220 – 20
180= 1,11
Value Added and ROI of Human Capital
P&B = Pay & Benefits
OE = Other Expenses(Total expenses minus Pay & Benefits)
R = Revenue
FTE = Full-Time Equivalent
R – OE
FTE=
R – OE
P&B=
Source: Jac Fitz-Enz: The ROI of Human Capital.
143Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Measuring Employee Performance
Revenue 200.000 k€Employees 2.000 FTE
Revenue/FTE 100 k€
Total Expenses 180.000 k€Personnel Exp. 140.000 k€Workdays/Year 220
Company Example Indicators
Profit/FTE 10.000 €HCVA* 160.000 k€
Human Capital Value Added Revenue – (Total Exp. – Personnel Exp.)=
Human Capital ROIHuman Capital Value Added
Personnel Expenses=
HCROI** 114 %
× 100%
*
**
*/** Source: Jac Fitz-Enz (2000). The ROI of Human Capital. Amacon.
HCVA/FTE 80 k€
144Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
How much does a Top-Perfomer add more Value than an average Employee?
Source: Corporate Leadership Council (2003)
Reponse by HR Directors
145Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Added Value in Key Functions compared to Other Functions
Performance
Added Value
1 2 3
0,5 1 1,5
C B A
146Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Differenciated Added Value Estimation
Key Function
Others
10%
90%
C 10% B 70% A 20%
FTE 20Factor 1
Per FTE (k€):HCVA 69P-Exp. 80Benefit - 11
FTE 140Factor 2
HCVA 139P-Exp. 100Benefit 39
FTE 40Factor 3
HCVA 208P-Exp. 120Benefit 88
FTE 180Factor 0,5
HCVA 35P-Exp. 60Benefit -25
FTE 1.260Factor 1
HCVA 69P-Exp. 70Benefit -1
FTE 360Factor 1,5
HCVA 104P-Exp. 90Benefit 14
Per FTE (k€): Per FTE (k€):
Per FTE (k€): Per FTE (k€): Per FTE (k€):
147Prof. Dr. Armin Trost Advanced Human Resource Management; HFU Business School (2009) www.armintrost.de
Training ROI CalculationExample
A Revenue (T€) 7.772.361
B Expenses (T€) 6.652.523
C Pay & Benefits (T€) 3.549.686
D FTE 28.797
E Human Capital Value Added (HCVA)/FTE (T€) 162 (A-(B-C))/D
F Productivity Increases 1%
G Impacted FTE (prop.) 1%
H Impacted FTE (abs.) 288 D*G
I HCVA Increase/FTE (T€) 1,62 E*F
J Increase of Operating Income (T€) 467 H*I
K Costs of Training Measure (T€) 420
L Training ROI per Year 11% (J-K)/K