a comparison of online and paper-based test results sanja Čandrlić, [email protected]...

17
A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, [email protected] Martina Ašenbrener Katić, [email protected]

Upload: nigel-snow

Post on 22-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

A comparison of online and paper-based test results

Sanja Čandrlić, [email protected]

Martina Ašenbrener Katić, [email protected]

Page 2: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Presentation outline

• Introduction• Research and testing environment• Research results• Conclusion• Future work

214th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 3: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Introduction

• Comparative research of paper-based testing vs. online testing• ICT more and more used, also in education

– Many advantages– Knowledge assesment as an important part of educational process

• The aim of the research: – Can online tests replace traditional paper based tests?– What types of questions should online test contain?

• Online test

314th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 4: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Online testing

• Reasons to move to online testing?– Automated correction -> more students, less time, the computer program

evaluates the tests (for some questions)

• Objective & subjective question types– True/false– Multiple choices – Connections– Essay– Short answer

414th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 5: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Question types

514th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 6: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Research environment

• - a customized Moodle solution, adapted to the needs of UniRi

• 1231 tests included in this research • 3 courses in the field of information systems design:

– Data Modeling, – Process Modeling – Information Systems

614th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 7: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Research environment

• Online testing since 2009– first online tests included a certain percentage of subjective questions– Data Modeling, Process Modeling

• Online testing since 2011 – intention to ease the correction – online tests with only objective questions – Information Systems course– the number of students and teachers' teaching load increased

• Can online tests consisting exclusively of objective questions completely replace paper-based tests?

714th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 8: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Test properties and participants

• 15 – 25 questions from different categories in online tests and paper-based tests

• Time limit to solve the tests, both for online and paper-based tests• Shuffled questions in online tests• Online tests set up to be solved in a ‘safe window’

• Single major and Double major program of informatics

8

14th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 9: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Tests set up

9

14th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

 Paper-based tests,

all 3 coursesOnline tests

DM, PMOnline tests

IS

Question types

essay, short essay,

listings, image drawing,

short answer questions

multiple choice,true/false,

connection, essay,

short answer questions

multiple choice,true/false, connection

Duration 60 minutes 20 minutes 20 minutes

Nr of questions 15 (on average) 20 (on average) 25 (on average)

Nr of tests 753 310 168

Page 10: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Questions and points set up

10

14th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Paper-based tests DM & PM online tests IS online tests

Essay Objective questions Objective questions

Short essay Multiple answer Multiple answer

Listings True/false True/false

Drawing Connection Connection

Short answer Subjective questions

Essay

Short Answer

50% points

50% points

70%

30%

100%

Page 11: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Main hypothesis

Descriptive statistical analysis:• High variance coefficient for paper-based test results – arithmetic mean

cannot be considered as representative central tendency indicator• Low value of quartile deviation coefficient – median is a better indicator

of central tendency

H: There is no significant difference in median values of the results achieved during MudRi online tests and traditional paper-based tests

1114th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 12: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Test results

1214th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

1. Box-plot diagrams for Data Modeling course (left online tests, right paper-based tests)

.2.4

.6.8

1

Box-plot diagram for DM course

(left online, right paper-based)

0.2

.4.6

.81

Box-plot diagram for PM course

(left online, right paper-based)

Box-plot diagram for IS course

(left online, right paper-based)

1. Box-plot diagrams for Information Systems course (left online tests, right paper-based tests)

0.2

.4.6

.81

Page 13: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Research results

• Normality analysis indicated the use of nonparametric statistic methods for hypothesis testing

Mann-Whitney test: • Data Modeling course – no significant statistic difference in median

values (p=0.2401) between online and paper-based tests. • Process Modeling course – no significant statistic difference in median

values (p= 0.3777) between online and paper-based tests. • Information Systems course – the difference is extremely significant

(p=0.0066).1314th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 14: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Conclusion

• For DM & PM the H is confirmed• For IS the H is rejected

• IS – better results -> lower levels of knowledge, based on recognition• Paper-based tests:

– higher max points -> subjective factor, partially correct, “hidden knowledge”– min points = 0 - > students give up

1414th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 15: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Conclusion (2)• Transition from paper-based to online tests: Essay-> objective q.• To explain, to describe, ... 30 % of subjective q., manual correction• Advantages of online tests:

– automated correction, – easy to use (after forming the question bank)– immediate test results for the students– students prefer to use the keyboard– comparative overview of test results (for the teacher)

• Advantages of paper-based tests: – easy to prepare– „drawing” questions

1514th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 16: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

Future work

• Efforts to further improve methods for online assessment• Revising the question bank• Analysis of students’ answers• Too easy questions (100% correct)• Too hard questions (potentially unclearly stated, incomprehensible to

the students)• Plan to update the question bank with sets of different types of

questions for formative assessment – to test their knowledge during preparation for the tests

1614th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia

Page 17: A comparison of online and paper-based test results Sanja Čandrlić, sanjac@inf.uniri.hr sanjac@inf.uniri.hr Martina Ašenbrener Katić, masenbrener@inf.uniri.hrmasenbrener@inf.uniri.hr

• Thank you for your attention!

• Questions?

1714th Workshop SE Education and Reverse EngineeringSinaia