7% 1 exploration itd. geology geophysics mining …

> 7 % 1 ../'

GEOLOGY GEOPHYSICS exploration Itd. MINING ENGINEERING

Suite 614-850 WEST HASTINGS STREET, VANCOUVER, B.C. TELEPHONE (604) 681-0191 V6C 1E l

GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL and GEOCHEMICAL REPORT

on the

GONZO CLAIM

Cariboo Mining Division - British Columbia

Lat. 57' 42' N. Long. 12fo 50' W.

N.T.S. 93 AI12 d

for

Gunsteel Resources Incorporated

J. Gravel (M.Sc.1 D. G. Allen, P. Eng. (B.C.) D. R. MacQuarrie, (B.Sc.)

July 20, 1986 Vancouver, B.C.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

CONCLUSION

RECOMMENDATIONS

ESTIMATED COSTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS INTRODUCTION

LOCATION, ACCESS, PHYSIOGRAPHY

CLAIM DATA

GEOLOGY

Regional Geology

Property Geology

MINERAL OCCURRENCES OF THE CARIBOO-QUESNEL GOLD BELT

QR Deposit

Cariboo Bell

Frasergold Prospect

PREVIOUS FIELDWORK

1986 FIELDWORK

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Basemetal Pattern

Mafic Rock

GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS

Magnetometer Survey

VLF Survey

COMPILATION OF RESULTS

1

2

3

4

5

5

5

6

6

6

7

8

9

9

9

10

10

10

11

11

11

11

1 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd.)

FIGURES

Figure 1 Location Map 1:10,000,000

Figure 2 Access Map 1 : 250,000

Figure 3 Claim Map 1 : 50,000

Figure 4a Property Location Map Quesnel River Area 1:125,000

Figure 4b Quesnel Gold Belt 1 : 700,000

Figure 5 Sample Location Map 1 : 5,000

Figure 5a-e Geochemical Maps 1 : 5,000

Figure 5f-p Geochemical Maps 1:15,000

Figure 6a Magnetic Survey 1 : 5,000

Figure 6b VLF-Electromagnetic Map 1 : 5,000

Figure 7 Compilation Map 1 : 15,000

Figure 8a Magnetic Contour & Electro- magnetic Conductor Map 1 : 15,000

Figure 8b Total Field VLF Contour Map 1:15,000

Figure 8c Electromagnetic Profiles Map (low freq., coaxial coils) 1:15,000

Figure 8d Electromagnetic Profiles Map (high freq., coplanar coils) 1:15,000

APPENDICES

Appendix I 1984 Airborne Geophysical Surveys

Appendix I1 Sampling Procedures, Analytical Procedures, Statistics and Data Listing

After p. 5

After p. 5

After P. 6

After p. 6

After p. 7

In pocket

In pocket

After p. 10

In pocket

In pocket

After p. 10

Appendix I

Appendix I

Appendix I

Appendix I

Appendix 111 Affidavit of Expenses

1

SUMMARY

w

Gunsteel Resources Incorporated holds title to the GONZO claim, a

16 unit block located in the Cariboo Mining Division of central British

Columbia. The property lies 55 kilometres southeast of Quesnel and is

directly accessible by a branch of the Nyland Lake logging road. Past work consists of an airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey in

1984. The 1986 follow-up program comprised preliminary ground geo-

physical and soil geochemistry surveys.

The GONZO claim is strategically located along the Quesnel Basin

fault, three kilometres north of the QR and QR West deposits and 44

kilometres southeast of the Maud occurrence. Other important dis-

coveries in the area include the Cariboo Bell deposit and Mt. Calvery's

Spanish Mountain occurrence, 19 and 27 kilometres to the southeast,

respectively. Significant geochemical and geophysical anomalies have

been found to the north (Titan Resources Ltd., Curator Resources Ltd.,

Buena Exploration) of the property.

The aforementioned properties lie within the Quesnel Trough, a

northwest trending belt of dominantly Lower Mesozoic volcanic and

volcanically derived sedimentary rocks. The QR and Cariboo Bell

deposits are associated with complex alkalic intrusions that are coeval

to the enclosing volcanics. Both discoveries are based on geochemically and geophysically derived drill targets.

Approximately 5.5 kilometres of grid lines were established as

follow-up to the 1984 airborne geophysical surveys. VLF-EM and proton

precession magnetometer readings were taken every 25 metres, and B

horizon soil samples were collected every 100 metres on this grid. 49

soil samples were analysed for gold at Rossbacher Laboratory Ltd. and 30

element ICP spectrometry at Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd.

Gold is uniformly low: no samples contain above the,detection

limit (5 ppb) concentration. Two principal anomaly distribution

patterns, termed the basemetal pattern and mafic rock pattern, were

observed. The patterns probably reflect a change in bedrock types. The

2

mafic rock patter.1 is thought to overlie mafic volcanics whereas the

basemetal pattern could be defining sulphide bearing sediments or more

felsic volcanics and volcaniclastics. A sharp increase in the magnetic

field in the area of the mafic rock pattern also suggests mafic

volcanics as the underlying rock type. Moderate magnetic readings

coincident to the basemetal pattern suggests the underlying rock type

may be an andesite.

CONCLUSION

Recent positive results by various companies in the Quesnel River

area indicate it will continue to be one of intense exploration

activity. The GONZO claim is strategically located in terms of:

proximity to known deposits; position along favourable structures; and

geology.

Good accessibility and moderate to thin glacial drift promote cost

effective exploration.

Moderately anomalous copper, lead, zinc, silver, manganese, iron,

arsenic, potassium and aluminum indicate underlying sedimentary or

felsic volcanic rock with minor sulphides, while the magnetometer

results suggest an andesite.

The reconnaissance grid lines are too sparse to properly evaluate the gold potential of the GONZO. Presence of the Maud Lake Fault

bisecting the property and the nearby Maud Lake occurrence argue

favourably for mineralization. Further geochemical and geophysical work

is warranted to give a proper evaluation and prove up targets for

trenching andfor diamond drilling.

3

RECOMMENDATIONS

A two-phase program is proposed to properly evaluate the mineral

potential of the GONZO claim. Phase I consists of extending the present

grid to cover the entire claim block. Geochemical samples should be

collected at a 100x200 metre spacing with VLF-EM and magnetometer

readings gathered every 25 metres. IP traverses are suggested over the

whole of the grid.

Based on results of Phase I, trenching is recommended for zones having coincident anomalous geochemical and IP responses. Follow-up

drilling is warranted if initial results are encouraging. Estimated

costs for Phase I and I1 are $23,000 and $77,000, respectively, for a

grand total of $100,000.

W

4

V .ESTIMATED COSTS OF RECOMMENDATIONS

PHASE I Geochemical soil sampling, geological mapping, VLF-EM, Magnetometer and Induced Polarization surveys.

Salaries Geologist 15 days @ $200/day 4 Assistants 60 days 63 $100/day

Geochemical Analyses 250 samples @ $12 Room and Board 75 man-days @ $35 Vehicle Rental Material, Camp Supplies Instrument Rental Report and Maps

Subtotal Contingencies

TOTAL PHASE I

Phase I1 Follow-up trenching and diamond drilling.

Salaries Geologist Ass is t ant

Room and Board Vehicle Rental Backhoe for trenching Bulldozer for drill

site preparation Dr ill ing Geochemical Analyses Material and Supplies Report and Maps

1 mo. @ $6,000 1 mo. @ $3,000 60 man-days @ $35

75 hrs. 63 $75/hr.

100 hrs. @ $80/hr.

250 samples @ $12 1,000 ft. @ $35/ft.

Subtotal Contingencies

$ 3,000.00 6,000.00 3,000.00 2,625.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,500.00

$20,125.00 $ 2,875.00

$23,000.00

$ 6,000.00 3,000.00 2,100.00 1,000.00 5,625.00

8,000 .OO 35,000.00

3,000.00 3,000.00 2,500.00

$69,225.00 7.775.00

TOTAL PHASE I1 $77,000.00

GRAND TOTAL $ioo,ooo .oo

W

5

INTRODUCTION

V

Gunsteel Resources Incorporated holds the GONZO claim, a 16 unit

block which was staked based on its favourable geology, structure and

position relative to several substantial gold discoveries in the Cariboo-Quesnel Gold belt. The property lies immediately north of Dome

Mines' QR (950,000 tons grading 0.21 oz/ton Au) and QR West deposits.

This report summarizes results of a program of preliminary

geochemical, VLF-electromagnetic and magnetic surveys carried out on the

GONZO claim from June 11 to 12, 1986. Also summarized is the geology of

the QR, QR West, Maud and other exploration targets in the

Cariboo-Quesnel gold belt.

LOCATION, ACCESS, PHYSIOGRAPHY

The GONZO claim is situated 55 kilometres southeast of Quesnel,

British Columbia (Figure 1). The property lies along Maud Creek, a

tributary of Quesnel River (Figure 2). The area is part of the Quesnel

Highlands of the Interior Plateau. Low rolling hills elongated in the

direction of glaciation (310') separated by boggy depressions are the

principal geophysiographic features. The hills are typically covered by

a thin veneer of glacial till which varies from less than one metre to several tens of metre's thick. Maximum relief of about 50 metres is

observed along Maud Creek.

Forest cover consists of mature growths of lodgepole pine, balsam,

fir, spruce and poplar with undergrowth of alder and willow. A branch

of the Nyland Lake logging road traverses the northeast corner of the

claim block making the property accessible by 4-wheel drive vehicle

(Figure 2).

CLAIM DATA

The claim is owned 100% by Gunsteel Resources Incorporated. The

claim Record Number is 4881 and expiry date is June 6, 1987. Two

GUNSTEEL RESOURCES CORP.

G O N Z O C L A I M LOCATION MAP

F I G U R E - I

;ACCESS MAP aiLowiaLs I

SCALE - Y l L f S GONZO CLAIM 0 S S

I : 250,000

Cariboo Mining Division - British Columbia

I I

B

Figure 2

6

internal claims are not held by Gunsteel. Claim boundaries are shown on

Figure 3 .

GEOLOGY

Regional Geology

The area of interest is underlain by a thick sequence of mainly

Upper Triassic and Lower Jurassic volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks

that lie in a fault bounded structure termed the Quesnel Trough

(Campbell and Tipper, 1970). It is a northwesterly trending feature about 35 kilometres wide (Figure 4a) which is flanked on the east by Proterozoic and Paleozoic strata of the Omineca geanticline and on the

west by Upper Paleozoic rocks of the Pinchi geanticline. Intrusive rocks in the trough fall into two age groups. Those grouped as 200

m.y.2 include two types: (la) plutons and batholiths such as the

Takomkane batholith, which vary in composition from granodiorite to

quartz diorite and (lb) small alkalic stocks that are apparently coeval

with enclosing volcanic rocks and vary in composition from syenite

through diorite to pyroxenite; ( 2 ) plutons of the 100 m.y.2 age group

are primarily biotite quartz monzonite and granodiorite and are commonly

porphyritic - one such intrusion outcrops in the Quesnel River valley seven kilometres southwest of the claim area and another unmapped

intrusion lies about five kilometres northwest of Maud Lake.

Property Geolopy

Because relief in the GONZO claim area is subdued, outcrops are

nonexistant. Most of the rock types observed only in float were phases

of andesite and basalt with varied textures. Of these, porphyritic

augite andesite phases predominate. Areas of low magnetic relief

suggest that the northern half of the claim area is actuallylunderlain

by sedimentary rocks.

The main rock types in the immediate area as described by Campbell

(1978) are as follows:


CLAIM MAP GONZO CLAIM

Cariboo Mining Division - British Columbia //ywJ?d Abh exploration Itd.

N . T . S . 93 A/12W

Figure 3

. r

EJtl

x l b

Wb BERG T ITAN RESOURCES

\ QUESNEL RIVER LO CAT ION

I

LY RESOURCES INC.

E a B EXPLORATION LTD.

R.M. DURFELD Updotod : June 25,1984

I 2 128,000


PROPERTY LOCATION M A P QUESNEL RIVER AREA

L EGEND 8

KILOMETRES M I L CI

-- Boundary of Mesozoic volcanic and sedimentary 0

\ \

TATTERSALL OIL a MINERAL EXPL.

/ I

f I

I \

W. \ BRAELLR

2 1 J.ORR

F SIYS . . -. .-. - R.HAYES '1.

i. i -2 Jurassic -Cretaceous quartz monzonite ,granodiorite A SCALE

1. Ti7 - Lower Jurassic olkalic stocks

0 Copper prospect

P ' G E O L O G I C A L B R A N C H ', A S S E S S M E N T R E P O R T

7

V Unit 'IL Ja - (Norian and ( ? ) Younger) - basaltic tuff and breccia,

generally fine-grained; argillite, flows, chert.

Unit 'A Jb - (Norian and ( ? ) Younger) - augite porphyry basalt breccia, minor flow, tuff and tuffaceous argillite, local andesitic

basalt.

MINERAL OCCURRENCES OF THE CARIBOO-QUESNEL GOLD BELT

In addition to the well known placer gold deposits, two

significant mineral deposits occur in the Quesnel River area. The QR

prospect is a gold discovery currently being explored by Dome Mines Ltd.

Reserves reported by Dome are 950,000 tons grading 0.21 oz/ton gold

(1981 Dome Mines Annual Report). The Cariboo Bell deposit is a large

tonnage, low grade, copper-gold deposit currently being explored by

E and B Exploration. Mineable open pit reserves are 117 million tons

grading between 0.04 and 0.05 oz/ton gold (North American Gold Mining

News, January 15, 1984). In addition, recent discoveries in the area

have been made by Dome Mines - the QR West and Maud deposits (Figure

4 b ) .

Results of work on claims held by Titan Resources Ltd., eight

kilometres to the north of the GONZO claim, have recently been announced (see Titan Resources Ltd., various new releases). This work outlined a

strong 1200 metre long VLF-EM conductor. Highly anomalous gold values

(>lO,OOO ppb Au) are reported in heavy mineral concentrate samples over

and downstream from the conductor. Follow-up surveys and diamond

drilling were carried out with limited success.

Exploration by Curator Resources Ltd. (December 13, 1983, company

news release) south of the Maud deposit has outlined two strong induced

polarization zones and a number of copper, gold, lead, silveq and zinc

geochemical anomalies, immediately east of the GONZO claim.

Mt. Calvery Resources have announced a new gold discovery on

Spanish Mountain 24 kilometres to the east-southeast. Gold occurs

ARGILL IT€, AUGITE - PORPHYRY BRECCIA, BASALTIC TO ANDESITIC TUFF POSSIBLE OYKES 8 SILLS P Placer Au

(major occurrence 1

F i g u r e 4b. QUESNEL GOLD BELT - TECTONIC FEATURES AND GOLD OCCURRENCES

After S a l e k e n and Simpson ( 1 9 8 4 )

8

associated with pyrite in phyllites and graphitic phyllites with values

to 0.1 oz/ton Au over widths up to 15 metres (see Mt. Calvery Resources,

various news releases).

Copper - + gold mineralization is widespread in the Quesnel Trough. A number of copper prospects are shown on Figures 4a and 4b. The

scarcity of mineral occurrences to the north of Quesnel River may be because of widespread glacial drift and lack of outcrop and hence, up

until recently, the area has not been intensely explored.

QR Deposit

Geological data of the QR deposit has not been published; however,

a brief description of the property prior to the discovery of the gold

deposit was made by Richardson (1978). According to Richardson:

"Dark grey alkali basalts and layers of unstratified basaltic

autobreccia form outcrops on the west part of the property. Poorly

bedded volcanic wackes, sedimentary grits, and stock comprising

augite diorite, biotite monzodiorite and minor coarse grained

syenite outcrop on steep slopes of the Quesnel River valley. The

stock is exposed along the valley side for some 1100 metres. The

east and north part of the stock is highly fractured and altered

to K-feldspar veinlets and irregular patches of epidote. Pyrite

is abundant and forms disseminated grains and thin films on fractures. Magnetite forms disseminated aggregates and small stockwork zones associated with K-feldspar and epidote."

Gold mineralization, according to Saleken and Simpson (1984) after

Fox (1983), is associated with a pyrite-epidote alteration zone flanking

the zoned stock.

9

w

Cariboo Bell

The Cariboo Bell deposits have been described by Hodgson et a1

(1976) and by Simpson and Saleken (1983). The deposits occur in an

alkalic syenite complex which intrudes the upper part of thick sequence

of Upper Triassic trachybasalts and volcaniclastic strata. Volcanic

conglomerate and sandstone form a thick unit at the base of the

sequence. Volcanic flows in the sequence are of two types:

(1) porphyritic augite trachybasalts with pillow basalt and aquagene

tuff; and ( 2 ) andesite trachybasalt. Crystal and lapilli tuff and

polymictic volcanic breccias occur locally. This volcanic assemblage is

intruded by a coeval subvolcanic laccolith consisting of six phases.

These phases include syenodiorite, monzonite, porphyry, intrusion

breccia, pyroxenite-gabbro, and pseudoleucite syenite lenses.

Magnetite, chalcopyrite and pyrite occur as dissemination, fracture

fillings and cavity fillings in the intrusion breccias near the top of

the laccolith. Potash feldspar-biotite-diopside alteration surrounded

by garnet-epidote alteration zones occur within the breccia zones.

Frasergold Prospect

The Frasergold deposit, as described by Belik (1983), appears to

be a stratabound gold deposit. Gold mineralization occurs within an

iron-carbonate-rich member of a phyllite sequence of Upper Triassic age. Gold occurs both within the phyllite and in quartz-carbonate "sweats".

PREVIOUS FIELDWORK

Previous fieldwork consists of 18.1 line kilometres of

helicopter-borne multi-frequency electromagnetic and magnetometer

surveys, conducted by R. Sheldrake of Apex Airborne Surveys Ltd. in

1984. Summary of R. Sheldrake's report is given in Appendix 1.-

10

1986 FIELDWORK

Soil geochemistry, VLF-EM and magnetometer surveys were employed

to follow up anomalous geophysical features highlighted by the airborne

survey. A total of 49 samples were collected at a spacing of 100 metres on lines 49N, 52N, 54N and 62N giving 5.5 kilometres of grid.

Geophysical measurements were taken every 25 metres. Work was completed

by a four-man crew consisting of J. Gravel, D. Brownlee, D. Sorenson and

B. Stewart in seven man-days. Sampling procedures, analytical methods, statistical interpreta-

tion and a listing of results is given in Appendix 11. Sample sites and

numbers are plotted on Figure 5 and sample results plotted on Figures 5a to 5p. A compilation of results is presented on Figure 7.

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

All gold analyses were below the detection limit of 5 ppb in

concentration.

Two principal anomaly patterns are evident on examination of the

other element plots. These are termed the basemetal pattern and the

mafic rock element pattern after the association of elements that define

each pattern.

Basemetal Pattern

The basemetal pattern is defined by copper (Figure 5a) up to peak

concentration of 142 ppm, lead (Figure 5b) up to 21 ppm, zinc (Figure

5c) up to 166 ppm, silver (Figure 5d) up to 0.8 ppm, manganese (Figure

5f) up to 1475 ppm, iron (Figure 5g) up to 5.1 %, arsenic (Figure 5h) up

to 15 ppm, aluminum (Figure 5m) up to 3.03% and potassium (Figure 5p) up to 0.19%. The anomalies are predominantly found on lines 49N and 52N

from 104+50E to 98E. Anomaly levels are modest, likely reflecting minor

sulphide in a sedimentary or felsic volcanic rock unit.

LEGEND + M o n g onete

Soi I siit - Rock

r'" a 0 0 e

0

9 50 800 6 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 400

0 PPm

r* +

0

950

650 550 500 ' 400 '

0 PPm

800 'I

V

N .T.S. 93 A / 12

+ GUNSTEEL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP MANGANESE

J u l y , 1986 exploration Itd.

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

L E G E N D + G U N S T E E L R E S O U R C E S I N C . t

GONZO CLAIM I RON S o i I Si It Rock

( 4 . 9 0 4.50

4.90 4.50 4.15 t 4.15

P

v T 3.80 . 3.80 . . 3.60 . 3.60 . 0 3.35 0 3.35 v

GEOCHEMICAL MAP I R O N

4SO n

0 0 O/O 0 O/O

exploration Itd. J u l y , 1986

L E G E N D

A r s e n i c Soi I S i l t Rock

+

r" 0 0 0 0

20 I 5 I 2 10 8

f + 9

20 IS 12 IO 0

t

N .T.S. 93 A / 12

GUNSTEEL RESOURCES I N C.

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP A R S E N I C

4so 8 ) O o

0 480

I600 S C A l t

0 I ' 15,000

J u l y , 1986

L E G E N D

C a l c i u m +

Soil Sill

t v

Rock

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

GUNSTEEL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM

r' 1.00 0.80 0.80

0.70 0.70 0.60 . 0.60

r'" 1.00

0.50 0.50 . - - .

0.45 0.45 0

0 O/O 0 O/O

GEOCHEMICAL MAP C A L C i UM

YLTRk 4S0 0

SCALE - r r n 1800 0 1800

I ' 15,000


4 P - --./-

J u l y , 1986 exploration ltd.

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

I

L E G E N D

C hr o m i u m Soil Silt Roc h

+ + G U N S T L E L R E S O U R C E S I N C .

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP C H R O M I U M

.'# 120 105 + 0

e 85 75 85 7 5

65 65 ' 0 0

0

4SO 0 @ NgTItk SCALE 1- FELT

55 0 55 *

0 PPm 0 w m 1500 ' 0 WOO I I IS,OoO

N.T.S. 93 A / 12


LEGEND

Ti t o n i u m + t GUNSTEEL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM Soi I S i l t Rock

I

f9 G E O C H E M I C A L M A P T I T A N I U M

r' 0.20 0

0.18 'I 0.16 + 0.16 T 0.14 . 0.14 ,

6. 0.20 0.18 +

0 0.10 0 0.10 SCALE k-- t L I f

450 wrtrt: 0.12 . 0.12 . 480 0

0 % 0 O/O IS00 0 1800 - . - I I 15,000

L E G E N D

Y o t ~ n r r i u m +

Soi I S i l t Rock

.'' 1.70 1.35 1.20 : 1.00 . 0.90

0 O/O

0.80 0

r' 0

1.70 I. 35 1.20 1.00 0.90 0.80

0 O/O

exploration Itd.

N .T.S. 93 A / 12

+ GUNSTeEL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP M A G N E S I U M

480 SCALE &!g4

1800 0 WOO

J u i v . 1986

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

L E G E N D + + GUNSTLEL RESOURCES I NC.

A l u m i n i u m

S o i l S i l t Rock GONZO CLAIM

f 2.50 2 .30

d' 2.50 2 .30

1.95 1.95 2.10 + 2.10 (I

0 1.80 ' I .80 1.55 . 1.55 '

0 0 Yo 0

0 O/O 0

GEOCHEMICAL MAP A L U M I N I U M

J u l y 1986 exploration Itd.

FIGURE 5 m

L E G E N D t

P o t a r r i u m So i I Silt Roc It

+ GUNSTLEL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP 4? P O T A S S I U M

< 0.14

0.08 . 0.08 0.06 0.06 450 0 450

0.12 'I 0.14 0.12 0.10 + 0.10

0 0.04 0 0.04 V ' SCALE fl tLLt WLTRU

0 O/O 0 O/. 1500 0 #boo

I t 15,000


F/GUR€ 5 n

L E G E N D

Barium

Soi I Silt R o c k

+

2 0 0 I 6 5 145 I 2 5 115

r" +

200 I 6 5 145 125 115

+

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

GUNSTJZEL RESOURCES I N C .

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP B A R I U M

YETRt. SCALE CELT

moo 0 1500

I t IS,OoO

J u l y , 1986 /A:A\exploration ltd.

L E G E N D

P h o r p h o r u s +

Soi I Silt c) 4

Rock &t

4' 0.1 6 0.16 'I . 0.12 0.12 . 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07 ' _ _ 0.06 ' 0.06 '

0 P 0 O/O 0 O/O

0

+

N.T.S. 93 A / 12

GUNST€EL RESOURCES I NC.

GONZO CLAIM

GEOCHEMICAL MAP P H O S P H O R U S


FIGURL-

L E G E N O ,e-.

',' 1 G e o c h r m i c o l o n o m o l y . - - /

lflllllll V L F - E M o n o m o l y .

- I P o n o m o l y . -

N . T . S . 9 3 A /I2

G U N S T L E L R E S O U R C E S I N C .

GONZO CLAIM

COMPILATION MAP

*" Y L t R t 450 0

SCACE - FEET I500 0 I500

I ' 15,000

J u l y , 1986 explota t ion Itd.

11

Mafic Rock Pattern

The mafic rock pattern is described by calcium (Figure 5i) up to a

maximum of 1.23%, chromium (Figure 5j) up to 134 ppm, titanium (Figure

5k) up to 0.18%, magnesium (Figure 5k) up to 1.85% and phosphorus

(Figure 5p) up to .21%. The element association is typical of mafic

rock, either andesites or basalts. The unit underlying the baseline

104+50E from 49N to 60N varies from the unit underlying the southern

extension of lines 52N and 49N in that it is richer in chromium, calcium

and magnesium and somewhat lower in titanium and phosphorus.

GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS

Magnetometer Survey

The magnetometer survey (Figure 6a) over the GONZO claim high-

lights three magnetic signatures: a highly magnetic (58,000 gammas and

up) zone in the southwest corner; moderately magnetic zones (from 57,000

to 58,000 gammas) seen on lines 49N to 52N from 95+00E to 103+00E and

along the baseline from 52N to 58N; and low magnetic zones (less than

57,000 gammas) observed over the remainder of the grid. The moderate and highly magnetic zones could be a response to underlying andesitic

and basaltic rocks, respectively.

VLF Survey

Numerous short, poorly defined conductors are observed over the

GONZO claim (Figure 6b). The two best conductors, seen on lines 52N and

54N near the baseline, have peak to peak dip angles of 12O and 11' with

corresponding relative field strength increases of 8% and '6%. The

conductors roughly coincide with the moderate magnetic anomaly on the

baseline and likely represent a step effect related to change in the

type of bedrock.

12

COMPILATION OF RESULTS

Three geochemical patterns have been defined and outlined in

Figure 7 along with geophysical responses.

Patterns 1 and 3 are described as mafic rock patterns having enrichments in such mafic lithophile elements as chromium, titanium and

magnesium. Pattern 1 coincides to a strong magnetic field (b) indicat-

ing that the underlying rock is a basalt. Pattern 3 is coincidental

with moderate magnetic responses suggesting andesitic bedrock.

The basemetal pattern ( 2 ) has enriched concentrations in copper,

lead, zinc and a number of other elements indicating sulphide mineral-

ization. The magnetometer survey over pattern 2 outlined a moderately

magnetic rock (a) possibly an andesite or a magnetite bearing felsic

volcanic.

REFERENCES

W

Belik, G. D. (1982). Frasergold Property - in Eureka Resources Inc., Prospectus dated June 1, 1983.

Brock, J. S. (1984). Mt. Calvery Resources active in Cariboo-Quesnel. Western Miner, April, 1984, pp. 28-29.

Campbell, R. B. (1978). Quesnel Map Sheet, Geol. Surv. Canada, Open File 574.

Campbell, R. B. and Tipper, H. W. (1970). Geology and Mineral Exploration Potential of the Quesnel Trough, British Columbia. C.I.M. Bulletin, Vol. 63, pp. 785-790.

Deleen, M. E. (1984). Summary Report on the Cariboo-Likely Project. Prospectus Report for Mt. Calvery Resources Ltd. dated December 3 , 1984.

Fox, P. E. (1983). The QR deposit. Verbal presentation to the Vancouver M.E.G., November 30, 1983.

Fox, P. E. (1982). Geological and Geophysical Report on the Maud Property. B.C.Min of Mines and Pet. Res., Assessment Report 9956.

Fox, P. E. (1982). Diamond Drill Program on the Maud 1-7 Mineral Claims, Quesnel River Area. B.C. Minister of Mines Assessment Report 10527.

Fox, P. E., Cameron, R. S. and Hoffman, S. J. (1986). Geology and Soil Geochemistry of the Quesnel River Gold Deposit, B.C. AEG/GAC Cordilleran Section GEOEXP0/86 Symposium Abstracts, pp. 40-41.

Hodgson, C. J., Bailes, R. J. and Verzosa, R. S. (1976). Cariboo Bell in Porphyry Copper Deposits of the Canadian Cordillera. C . 1 . K Spec. Vol. 15, pp. 388-396.

Richardson, P. W. (1978). Assessment Report describing Soil Geo- chemical, Magnetic and Geological Surveys on the QR Claim Group. B.C. Ministry of Mines Assessment Report 6730.

Saleken, L. W. and Simpson, R. G. (1984). Cariboo Quesnel Gold Belt: A Geological Overview. Western Miner, April, 1984, pp. 15-20.

Sheldrake, R. F. (1984). Report on a Helicopter-borne Mulpifrequency Electromagnetic, VLF-Electromagnetic and Magnetometer Survey on Three Blocks within the Quesnel Basin Area, B.C.

REFERENCES

Simpson, R. and Saleken, L. W. (1983). Cariboo Bell Deposit in G.A.C.- - M.A.C. Field trip No. 4, Guidebook, pp. 13-21.

Troup, A. G. (1984). Report on the Victoria Creek Gold Prospect in Statement of Material Facts dated May 23, Titan Resources Ltd.

1984.

CERTIFICATE

I, John Gravel, certify that:

1. I am a Consulting Geologist and Geochemist, of GHS Geochemical Services with offices at Suite 311-1930 West 3rd Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia.

2. I am a graduate of McGill University with degrees in Geology (B.Sc., 1979) and Mineral Exploration (M.Sc., 1985).

3. I have practised my profession of exploration geologist/ geochemist since 1979 in British Columbia.

4 . I am a member in good standing of the Association of Exploration Geochemists and a member of the Geological Association of Canada.

5. This report is based on information listed under References, and fieldwork carried out by J. Gravel, D. Brownlee, D. Sorenson and B. Stewart during the period June 11th to June 12th, 1986.

6. I am a shareholder in Gunsteel Resources Incorporated, and as such have an interest in the GONZO property.

7. I consent to the use of this report by Gunsteel in connection with the raising of funds to carry out the further exploration program recommended.


John Gravel, B.Sc, M.Sc.

,-.

W'

CERTIFICATE

w

I, Douglas R. MacQuarrie, certify that:

1. I am a Consulting Geophysicist of A & M Exploration Ltd., with offices at Suite 614, 850 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.C.

2. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia with a degree in Geology and Geophysics (B.Sc., 1975).

3 . I have been practising my profession since 1975 and have been active in the mining industry since 1971.

4. I am an active member of the Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the British Columbia Geophysical Society .

5. This report is based mainly on information listed under References and fieldwork carried out by J. Gravel.

6. I am a Director and shareholder of Gunsteel Resources Incorporated and, as such, have an interest in the Gonzo property.

7. I consent to the use of this report in a Statement of Material Facts or in a Prospectus in connection with the raising of funds for the project covered by this report.


D. R. MacQuarrie B.Sc.

CERTIFICATE

I, Donald G. Allen, certify that:

1. I am a Consulting Geological Engineer, at A & M Exploration Ltd., with offices at Suite 614, 850 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia.

2. I am a graduate of the University of British Columbia with degrees in Geological Engineering (B.A.Sc., 1964; M.A.Sc., 1966).

3. I have been practising my profession since 1964 to the present in British Columbia, the Yukon, Alaska and various parts of the Western United States.

4. I am a member in good standing of the Association of Professional Engineers of British Columbia.

5. This report is based mainly on information listed under References and fieldwork carried out by J. Gravel.

6. I am a Director and shareholder of Gunsteel Resources Incorporated, and as such have an interest in the Gonzo property.

7. I consent to the use of this report by Gunsteel in connection with the raising of funds to carry out the further exploration program recommended.


Donald G. Allen P. Eng. (B.C.)

W

APPENDIX I

1984 AIRBORNE MAGNETIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

1

1984 AIRBORNE MAGNETIC AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY - ..

In 1984, an exploration program consisting of 18.1 kilometres of

helicopter-borne multifrequency electromagnetic, VLF-electromagnetic and

magnetic surveys was conducted over the GONZO claim.

The airborne geophysical surveys were conducted by R. Sheldrake of

Apex Airborne Surveys Ltd. The survey was part of a larger survey of

the general Maude Lake area. In addition, test flights were flown over

the QR and Cariboo Bell deposits to determine geophysical responses for comparison with anomalies generated in the survey area. Instrumenta-

tion and results of work are described in detail in a separate report by

Sheldrake (1984). A prominent magnetic feature which warrants examina-

tion for disseminated sulphidelgold mineralization was discovered.

Geophysical results of the general Maude Lake area as discussed by

Sheldrake are as follows:

"MAUD LAKE AREA - GEOPHYSICAL RESULTS

The predominant f e a t u r e s o f t h e MAUD LAKE AREA magnet ic mapsheet a r e t h e l i n e a r s t r u c t u r e s and g r a d i e n t s t h a t s t r i k e N.W.4.E. They a r e r e l a t e d t o a 120 k i l o m e t e r l o n g " r e g i o n a l f e a t u r e t h a t can be t raced from t h e GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA, Aeromagnetic Se r ies Maps. This l l l i neament l t extends f rom t h e nor th -west o f Maude Lake t o near t h e town o f L i k e l y and then southwards a long Quesne l Lake t o H o r s e f l y Bay c o n t i n u i n g southwards t o H o r s e f l y Lake and then t o t h e a rea o f Hendr ix (Sunset) Lake. A schematic i n t e r p r e t a t i o n o f t h e feature , ( f o r the purposes of this report ca l led the Q U E S N E L BASIN or Q B FAULT) and a suggested r e l a t i o n s h i p t o t h e QR and MAUD LAKE i n t r u s i v e r o c k s i s d i s p l a y e d i n FIGURE 2 below.

2

~

/n ,,,r 5-6 kilometres -1

~ D E ~ s I T , ~ k 1 QR DEPOSIT.

RAUDLAKE 1 1 Geophysically inferred ' lntrusives ' I /y/ of present survey. - - -.-

'J SURFACE- /,,

* s

x z % X x . BASEMENT ROCKS I.

% 1 x x x *

ac d

NOT TO SCALE

The magnet ic "edge e f f e c t " g r a d i e n t north-west o f t h e f a u l t i s caused by t h e t h i c k and r e l a t i v e l y magnet ic v o l c a n i c and sedimentary " p i l e " on t h e south-west s i e d o f t h e llQB Fau l t f 1 . Th i s "edge e f fec t " i s i n t h e o r d e r o f s e v e r a l k i l o m e t r e s .

The sugges t ion t h a t t h e OR and MAUD LAKE DEPOSITS a r e r e l a t e d t o t h e Q B F a u l t i s s p e c u l a t i o n a t t h i s p o i n t , however they a r e near i t . The OR d e p o s i t i s l e s s than 2 k i l o m e t r e s south-west o f t h e f a u l t and t h e MAUD LAKE D E P O S I T i s i n c l o s e p r o x i m i t y . .

3

The Q B F a u l t , f o r t he most p a r t , l i e s south-west o f t h e p resen t survey area, except a t t h e south-western co rne r o f t he NEL 1 C L A I M , t he southern p o r t i o n o f t h e GONZO 1 CLAIM, and t h e western p o r t i o n o f t h e C H A I Z 1 CLAIM. (The O B F a u l t s t r i k e s N-S i n the area o f t he C H A I Z 1 C L A I M . )

A number o f geophys ica l l y i n f e r r e d s t r u c t u r e s a re i n d i c a t e d from the p r e s e n t magnet ic survey t h a t appear t o be r e l a t e d , by v i r t u e o f t h e i r p r o x i m i t y and c o n t i n u i t y , t o t h e QB F a u l t .

I n t h e LIKELY area where t t f ea tu res t t ( i n t r u s i v e r o c k s ) a re i n s i m i l a r aspec t ( g e o p h y s i c a l l y speak ing) t o t h e Q B F a u l t , some o f them a r e known t o have anomalous g o l d values. (Persona l comunica t ion M r . John Brock, Mount Ca lve ry Resources Ltd.)

The d a t a i n d i c a t e 4 c a t e g o r i e s o f m a g n e t i c a l l y i n f e r r e d f e a t u r e s based on t h e i r d i s t a n c e f rom t h e OB F a u l t and the c h a r a c t e r o f t h e magnet ic responses.

Type 1, o f which t h e r e a r e 2 cases, a r e centered on t h e h i g h magnet ic va lues l o c a t e d i n t h e sou the rn p o r t i o n o f t h e GONZO 1 CLAIM and h i g h magnet ic va lues i n t h e western p a r t o f t h e C H A I Z 1 CLAIM. These f e a t u r e s l i e south and/or west o f t h e Q B F a u l t and may i n d i c a t e i n t r u s i v e r o c k s s i m i l a r t o those i n t h e Q R and MAUO LAKE area.

Type 2 r e f e r s t o those I tMagne t i ca l l y i n f e r r e d t l f e a t u r e s n o r t h and eas t of t h e OUESNEL B A S I N FAULT t h a t have r e l a t i v e l y s h o r t s t r i k e l eng ths . They l i e w i t h i n t h e p r e v i o u s l y mentioned g r a d i e n t caused by t h e "edge e f f e c t " o f t h e t h i c k vo l can ic / sed imen ta ry p i l e t o t h e south-west. These f e a t u r e s l i e n e a r e s t t o t h e OB F a u l t and a r e i n t e r p r e t e d as v o l c a n i c o r i n t r u s i v e rocks t h a t may have come up th rough secondary f a u l t s .

Type 3 r e f e r s t o t h e N.W.-S.E. magnet ic f e a t u r e t h a t i s g e n e r a l l y con t inuous between t h e LEE 1 CLAIM i n t h e south-east and t h e V I C 20 CLAIM i n t h e nor th -west . Th i s f e a t u r e i s s u b p a r a l l e l t o t h e QB F a u l t and may have o r i g i n a t e d th rough secondary f a u l t s t r u c t u r e s . These rocks may be t h e sources of t h e anomalous geochemistry va lues t h a t have been r e p o r t e d i n t h e area o f t h e Leb 1 CLAIM.

. .

REMARK: There a r e a number o f t l o f f - s e t s t t i n t h e ItType 3" f e a t u r e t h a t t y p i c a l l y i n d i c a t e f a u l t i n g . F u r t h e r , t h e r e may be anomalous d i s t o r t i o n of t h e r o c k s i n t h e nor th -west c o r n e r o f t h e SHANNON 1 CLAIM and t h e V I C 13 CLAIH which may i n d i c a t e an a rea o f a l t e r a t i o n o r severe f r a c t u r i n g . This a rea ought t o be tes ted .

Type 4 r e f e r s t o l e s s w e l l d e f i n e d magnet ic f e a t u r e s nor th -west o f t h e p r e v i o u s l y ment ioned l i neamen t (Type 3 f e a t u r e ) . These may be a c i d i c i n t r u s i o n s o r v o l c a n i c f l o w s w i t h i n t h e sedimentary sequence. They a r e r e l a t i v e l y i s o l a t e d and do n o t appear t o be r e l a t e d t o t h e OB F a u l t .

ELECTROMAGNETIC RESULTS

One hundred and t w e n t y - f i v e conductors have been p l o t t e d on PLATE 1, THE M A G N E T I C CONTOUR AND E.M. CONDUCTOR MAP. These conductors we.re s e l e c t e d from t h e lou- f requency c o a x i a l c o i l d a t a as responses most s u i t a b l e f o r "ha l f -p lane modeltt i n t e r p r e t a t i o n . Al though a l l o f them i n d i c a t e an i nc rease i n t h e c o n d u c t i v i t y o f t h e u n d e r l y i n g rocks , none o f t h e c a l c u l a t e d

4

w

conductances a r e above 15 mohs. One conductor, however, on L 65 a t f i d u c i a l 1436.15 appears anomalous because o f i t s t lwel l -def inedl t response and i t s p r o x i m i t y t o an i n f e r r e d i n t r u s i o n . Th is conductor may i n d i c a t e a l o c a l i z e d i n c r e a s e i n m e t a l l i c c o n t e n t and ought t o be t e s t e d .

The E l e c t r o m a g n e t i c P r o f i l e d a t a a r e q u i t e a c t i v e and i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e overburden i n t h e a r e a i s moderately conduct ive . Many o f t h e HEM responses a r e due t o c o n d u c t i v e overburden o r sha l low s loughs t h a t a r e f i l l e d w i th c o n d u c t i v e sediments. Under c o n d i t i o n s o f c o n d u c t i v e overburden, t h e e lec t romagnetometer becomes s e n s i t i v e t o t e r r a i n c l e a r a n c e v a r i a t i o n s and some o f t h e responses a r e due t o t h i s e f f e c t .

However, any r e a l i n c r e a s e i n c o n d u c t i v i t y i n t h e C H A I Z 2 AND V I C 1 CLAIMS, does n o t appear t o be r e l a t e d t o c o n d u c t i v e overburden and may i n d i c a t e i n c r e a s e d m e t a l l i c m i n e r a l i z a t i o n , a l t h o u g h t h e presence o f c o n d u c t i v e g r a p h i t i c r o c k s cannot be r u l e d o u t .

The VLF Electromagnetometer d i d n o t respond t o t h e g e o l o g i c a l f e a t u r e s i n f e r r e d by t h e magnet ic o r t h e H E M survey. The t t r e g i o n a l t t l o w f requency n a t u r e o f t h e c o n t o u r p a t t e r n i s due t o t h e e f f e c t o f topography.

However, t h e r e i s one area of d i s t o r t i o n i n t h e VLF d a t a t h a t i s n e a r t o a " t y p e 1" magnet ic f e a t u r e and may be anomalous. The c o n t o u r p a t t e r n i s d i s t o r t e d i n t h e a r e a o f L 134 f i d u c i a l 2628 and L 14 f i d u c i a l 2567 (on t h e CHAIZ 1 c l a i m ) may i n d i c a t e a zone of d i s t u r b e d o r a l t e r e d rock."

Airborne data for the GONZO claim is plotted on airphoto enlarg- ment basemaps (Figures 8a to 8d). Of significance are (1) a prominent

magnetic high which cuts across the southwest corner of the claim. This

is interpreted as a prominent structural break, between primarily

sedimentary rocks at the east and volcanic rocks on the west. It

appears to project along strike to the Maud deposit immediately to the

northwest.

LEGEND: NOTES:

Contour inltrvol = IO gammas -')WOO - - - Magnetic inclination 73..

Magndic d8cllnation 23. E .

- - -5.950-

'0" m m m m ( 0

D t o r o I t . , *"d"<l(nCe tee* >" I W C " " 1 , 3

INTERPRETATION :

Foul1

(2 Moqnclic low

E M Conductors - COn6"<l"c lODpm Jn D h O W lobel -A 'CIP001. W- Conloct

DATE JUNE 2 5 , 1 9 8 4 N T S 9 3 A / 1 2 and 9 3 A / 1 3

APEX AIRBORNE SURVEYS CTD

I

VANCOUVER. 8 c I

MAGNETIC CONTOUR

EM. CONDUCTOR MAP AND

MAUD LAKE AREA CARIB00 MINING DIVISION

G O N Z O C L A I M

LEGEND : NOTES :

Contour intervol 2 0 % lolo1 field strength. Station . Cutler,Main*, -.- 24.0 K hz -0-

- .-

d~reclton lo slolion I . *<;a,

- PLATE 2

TOTAL FIELD V L F CONTOUR MAP TRAmMITTlNQ STATION' CUTLER.MA1NE

MAUD LAKE AREA

CARIBOO MINING DIVISION

G O N Z O C L A I M

N T S 93 * / I 2 and 93 A I 1 3 DATE JUNE 25,1984

APEX AIRBORNE SURVEYS L T D VANCOUVER, 8 C

F i g . 8b

I LEGEND:

in-phose

Vertical scale = 5 ppmIcm

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES MAP I D W FREOUENCY.933hI .COAXIAL COlLS

MAUD LAKE AREA CAR1800 MINING DIVISION

G O N Z O C L A I M

N.1 S 9 3 A / 1 2 a n d 93 A / l 3 DATE JUNE 25,1984

APEX AlR8ORNE SURVEYS L T D VANCOUVER, 8 c

Fig. 8c

I LEGEND: A A e x p l o r a t l o n ttd

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES MAP HIOH FREOUENCY ,40010 hi,COPLANARCOlLS

MAUD LAKE AREA C A R 1 8 0 0 MINING OlVlSlON

I I 15.000

G O N Z O C L A I M Y I I

N T S 9 3 A / 1 2 and 9 3 A I 1 3 DATE JUNE 2 5 , I 9 8 4

APEX AIRBORNE SURVEYS L T O VANCOUVER, 8 c ,

F i g . 8d

APPENDIX I1

Analytical Results

1

w

w

SAMPLING PROCEDURES

The baseline for the GONZO grid was tied into the LCP and oriented at

135' to provide the best intersection of the structural lithological and

glacial trend. Soil samples were collected at 100 metre x 100 or 200

metre spacing depending on proximity to known geophysical targets.

A shovel was used to sample the B horizon at a depth varying from 20 to 60 centimetres. Approximately & to 1 kilogram of soil is placed in a Kraft paper bag and allowed to dry at ambient temperature prior to

shipment to the laboratory.

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Samples were sent to Rossbacher Laboratory Ltd. in Burnaby, British

Columbia, for sample preparation and gold analysis. Soil samples were

oven dried at 80° then desiccated and sieved to -80 mesh. Rock samples

are crushed and pulverized to -100 mesh. 0 Ten grams of the fine mesh fractions were then ashed at 520 and

leached by hot aqua regia. Gold is extracted from the acid solution by

MIBK and its concentration is then determined by atomic absorption

spectrometry.

Several grams of the -80 mesh fraction were shipped to Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd. for 30 element I C P analysis. A 0.5 gram

split of the sample pulp is digested in aqua regia and aspirated into the

ICP spectrometer. Results are outputted to a micro computer for hard copy

printout and reproduction on a floppy disk.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Sample concentrations are analysed using simple univariate statistics. Histograms are calculated and printed out using the UBC Amdal computer. Class intervals for the histograms are set to 1 / 4 standard

deviation, this is used f o r both arithmetic and logarithmic histograms.

2

Concentration intervals, represented by varying dot sizes used in the

element plots, are based on a combination of percentiles (i.e., 35th,

50th, 65th, 80th, 90th, 95th percentile) and estimated divisions between

families in multimodal populations.

DATA LISTINGS

A printout of field site observations, UTM coordinates and analytical results is given at the end of Appendix 11.

Field site parameters lie in column 1-80, UTM coordinates are in

columns 19-31 and analytical results are in columns 81 to 256. A coding

guide to field site parameters precedes the data listing.

W

ROSSBACHER LeIBOReTORY LTD,

h m d C E R T I F I C f i T E O F f i N A L Y S I 8

CERTIFICATE#: INVOICE#: DATE ENTERED: FILE NAME: PhGE # :

2225 S. S P R I N G E R A V E N U E E U R N A E Y , E.C. V5P 3N1 TEL : (604) 299 - 6910

S S S

s S S X

S s s

X

POSSBFICHER LrlBORATORY LTD, kd

C E R T I F I C A T E O F 4 N G L Y S I S

2225 S . S P R I N G E R AVENUE PURNCIPY, P.C. V58 3 N 1 T E L : ( 6 0 4 ) 299 - 6910

s S s S

s S

n

- 't

ACME ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES LTD. BJ2 E. HASTINOS ST. VANCOUVER 8. C. V6A 1R6 PHONE 253-3158 DATA LINE 2 5 1 - 1 0 1 1

G E O C H E M I C A L X C P A N A L Y S I S

.500 6RbI S A N K € IS DIGESTED YITH 3)(L 3-1-2 HU-HN03-H20 AT 95 M6. C FOR OWE HOUR MD IS DlLUTED TO 10 H i WITH YRTER. THIS LERCk IS P M T I A L FOR I(N.FE.CA.P.CR.AG.BA.TI.8.AL.NR.K,Y.SI.ZR.(X.SN.V.N8 AND TA. MJ DETECTION LIHIT BY ICP IS 3 PPH. - s A n w TYPE: PULP

DATE RECEIVED: JUNE 19 1986 DATE REPORT MAILED: z@ ASSAYER. .d+. .DEAN TOYE. CERTIFIED P.C. ASSAYEH.

A & H EXPLORATION PROJECT - 326 FILE # 86-1065 PAGE 1

SAWLEI I o Cu Pb Zn b9 N i Co I n Fr As U Au Th Sr Ed Sb Si V Cc P La C r I 9 Bc Ti 8 A1 Ha K Y

603090 1 102 17 98 -2 49 19 865 4.46 10 5 ND 1 55 1 2 2 103 -85 .05 14 89 1.33 87 .14 2 2.12 .02 .OB 2 603091 1 101 13 94 .3 39 16 768 3.81 10 5 ID 1 60 1 2 2 80 1.16 .07 10 70 1.09 85 .lo 4 1.95 .02 .OB 3

PPI P P I m PPI m ppn wn PPI x PPI PPI Ppn PPI PPI PPI PPI PPI PPI x x Ppn Ppn x PPH z PPI z z x PPI

603092 1 95 11 116 *6 40 22 1216 4.27 10 5 ID 1 46 2 2 2 98 .75 .07 14 68 -92 101 -10 4 2.15 e 0 2 -07 2 603093 1 142 21 166 .5 47 20 1262 4.07 8 5 ID 2 42 1 2 2 91 e64 .OS 15 73 1.02 80 .12 2 2.01 a 0 2 -07 1 603094 1 110 15 129 .4 57 20 1475 4.70 11 5 ID 1 41 1 2 2 83 .SO .07 25 83 1.18 137 .07 2 2.70 .01 .I4 2

603095 1 39 14 129 0 2 46 15 611 4.28 11 5 ND 3 29 I 3 2 66 m 2 9 e 0 5 16 60 1.05 82 -09 2 1.90 -01 013 1 603096 1 54 14 110 .4 42 14 423 3.97 6 5 ID 2 36 1 2 2 78 .35 .04 14 65 1.13 90 .10 2 2.35 .02 .12 1 603097 1 98 9 101 .6 49 22 1216 5.11 14 5 ND 1 66 1 2 2 111 .90 .09 14 75 1.48 118 .12 4 3.03 .03 .19 1 603098 1 37 10 59 .2 31 13 472 4.08 10 5 ID 1 45 1 2 2 113 .Sa .04 8 50 .90 54 .17 4 1.76 .02 .Ob 1 603099 1 43 9 98 - 2 28 14 607 4.10 7 5 MD 2 45 1 2 2 107 .61 .09 8 45 1.09 47 .17 2 1.90 .02 .07 1

603100 1 57 15 137 .5 27 18 1140 4.21 5 5 ND 1 69 I 2 > 95 .88 .I7 8 42 1.50 167 -17 2 2.16 .02 .24 1 603101 1 32 9 117 .3 24 1s 508 3.64 4 5 ND 1 45 1 3 3 94 .51 .I5 B 49 .81 64 .16 3 1.86 .02 .Ob 2 603102 1 61 4 67 .I 32 '16 962 3.95 7 5 ID 1 62 1 2 2 104 .92 .07 9 64 1.07 71 .16 11 1.93 .03 .07 1 603103 1 53 7 50 .3 31 13 514 3.60 8 5 ID 1 46 1 2 2 104 .57 .03 b 67 .93 S .IS 5 1.97 .02 .Ob 2 603104 1 42 3 94 .3 37 13 426 4.19 13 5 NU 2 38 1 2 2 99 .48 .I7 12 62 .93 72 .13 3 2.24 .02 .Ob 1

603105 1 70 8 99 .l 22 14 55b 3.44 6 5 )(D 1 E6 1 2 2 64 .3 .21 7 45 1.07 76 .IS b 1.89 .02 .09 1 603106 1 47 8 111 .1 35 14 631 3.68 8 5 ID 1 54 1 2 2 100 .57 .10 7 60 1.05 82 .15 7 2.03 .02 .06 2 603107 1 49 6 88 .4 36 12 481 4.07 13 5 ID 2 47 1 2 3 97 .48 .10 10 57 1.03 68 .12 4 2.04 .02 .07 1 603108 1 99 17 107 .4 46 19 E99 4.24 10 5 ID 2 51 1 2 2 91 -65 .06 18 60 1.12 97 .I1 2 1.98 .02 .I1 1 603109 2 36 8 128 .1 43 13 529 4.23 13 5 ID 4 26 1 2 2 66 -27 007 14 60 1.13 86 a09 2 1.96 a01 410 1

603110 1 56 15 145 .2 43 17 869 4.13 9 5 ND 2 48 I 2 2 BO .51 .ofl 16 I 1.04 105 .I1 4 1.99 .02 .12 2 6031 11 1 34 12 103 .l 42 13 655 3.74 9 5 3 37 1 2 2 68 .39 .OB 16 58 1.01 79 .If 3 1.67 .01 .09 1 603112 1 64 10 107 . 3 45 18 1027 4.58 14 5 ID 1 53 1 2 2 117 .69 .I1 12 74 1.36 97 .13 2 2.27 .02 .OB 1 603113 2 108 9 89 .4 43 16 622 4.29 14 5 ID 1 69 1 2 2 92 1.23 .06 12 74 .OB 109 .W 2 2.39 .02 .07 2 605064 1 22 9 104 .3 51 I1 397 3.19 8 5 ID 3 27 1 2 4 62 .33 .16 11 74 .89 110 .10 3 1.43 .01 .OS 1

605065 2 36 11 97 .1 46 11 453 3.26 15 5 NO 2 41 1 2 2 70 .49 .06 9 63 .92 82 .09 3 1.48 .01 .04 2

605067 1 25 9 121 .2 34 11 452 3.39 9 5 ID 2 32 1 2 3 65 .40 .I4 12 50 .77 129 .08 2 1.69 .01 .05 1 605068 3 63 17 140 .3 25 14 1168 4.62 13 5 ND 1 56 1 2 2 84 .39 .06 6 30 .26 242 .02 5 1.00 .01 .Ob 1 605069 1 50 5 129 .1 56 20 1185 4.29 12 5 ND 1 57 1 2 4 95 1.04 .09 8 63 1.54 181 .13 5 2.01 .02 .OB 1

605070 1 34 7 96 .2 33 11 362 3.18 9 5 ND 1 33 1 2 3 71 .43 .Ob 10 56 .65 107 .09 2 1.41 .01 .06 1 605071 1 39 14 74 .I 34 11 520 3.15 8 5 ND 3 45 1 2 2 70 .41 .06 14 58 .82 86 ,I1 4 1.38 .01 .07 1 605072 2 56 12 74 .3 39 15 818 3.59 4 5 ID 2 44 1 2 4 83 .52 -06 11 68 .98 82 .ll 3 1.67 .02 .OS 1 605073 1 50 5 65 .2 36 14 679 3.38 8 5 ND 2 51 1 2 4 78 3 9 .OB 9 70 .97 67 .13 2 1.44 .02 .06 1 605074 1 53 8 88 .2 43 15 580 4.21 15 5 ND 2 45 1 2 2 88 .45 .10 11 67 1.11 103 .I1 6 1.90 .02 .07 1

605075 1 60 14 89 .1 45 17 615 4.26 10 5 ND 1 56 1 2 2 93 .61 .lo 8 96 1.39 89 .I4 4 1.9B .02 .OB 1 STD C 20 60 39 141 7.0 71 29 1263 3.96 41 19 7 34 50 18 16 20 67 ,48 .I1 37 62 .E6 187 .09 38 1.73 .OB .I1 14

605066 2 57 10 87 .2 33 I4 1053 3.27 23 5 ID 1 46 1 2 2 76 -26 -04 14 54 .63 138 .06 4 1.33 e01 e06 1

I f:

A & M EXPLORATION PROJECT

A9 Ni Co I n Fe AS U Au Th Sr Cd P P I P P I P P I P P I I P P I P P I P P I P P I P P I P P I

- 326 FILE # 86-1065

Sb Bi V Ca P La Cr I 9 P P I P P I P P I I I P P I P P I I

FRGE 2

snIPLE+ I o Cu Pb P P I P P I P P I

In P P I

8a P P I

Ti 8 A1 Wa I P P I I 2

k Y 1 PPN

605076 605077 605078 605079 bo5080

605081 605082 605083 605084 605085

1 49 10 1 52 12 1 70 6 1 56 3 1 46 7

96 76 101 72 91

82 73 92

107 128

. 1 '49 17 552 3.65 5 5 ID 2 48 1

.2 58 17 512 3.74 7 5 ID 1 71 1

.2 57 18 S41 3.65 7 5 ND 1 54 1

.1 44 15 628 3.71 5 5 ID 1 54 1

.2 37 14 581 3.28 8 5 ID 1 55 1

.1 41 14 425 3.74 9 5 ID 1 47 1 .3 51 17 408 4.33 10 5 ID 1 46 1

.2 48 18 435 4.23 10 5 ID 1 48 1 .2 33 14 437 4.41 8 5 I 6 1 47 1

.2 57 18 471 3.77 io 5 ID 1 64 I

2 2 78 .52 .09 8 109 1.27 2 2 82 .86 .IS 5 134 1.85 2 2 86 .62 .10 6 109 1.43 2 2 89 .65 .12 7 79 1.25 2 2 80 .63 .06 6 83 1.29

2 2 84 .45 .I5 8 80 1.08 2 2 96 .47 .04 7 96 1.10 2 2 74 .84 .OS 5 123 1.44 2 2 89 .56 .I2 6 127 1.38 2 2 102 .52 .09 7 71 .92

84 107 85 68 68

.14 2 1.90 .03

.15 2 1.99 .OS

.14 3 2.06 .03

.12 3 1.74 .02

.I4 2 1.55 .03

.13 7 1.77 .02

.IS 1 2.15 .02

.13 3 1.96 .OS

.15 3 1.98 .04

.12 4 1.87 .02

.Ob 1

.11 3

.07 1

.07 1

.Ob 1

.Ob 1

.os 1

.07 1

.08 2

.05 1

1 35 14 1 53 11 1 48 13 1 37 7 1 43 11

99 93 88 82 88

605086 605087 605088 605089 605090

605091 605092 605093 605094 605095

1 63 8 1 55 8 1 34 6 1 30 12 1 31 12

1 28 8 1 33 3 1 69 5 1 44 13 2 44 13

77 75 66 73 97

76 138 93

121 99

.1 49 18 618 3.96 8 5 ID 1 68 1 * l 48 21 472 3.68 7 5 ID 1 80 1 e 1 36 12 (63 2.96 6 5 ID 2 39 1 a 1 31 11 438 2-05 9 5 NU 2 38 1 .2 SS 12 (04 3.36 10 5 ID 1 28 I

.2 27 8 265 2.68 6 5 ID 2 29 1

.6 25 14 356 3.84 9 5 ID 1 23 1 -4 46 16 699 4.14 22 6 ID 1 44 1 .2 57 16 697 3.60 15 5 ID 2 40 1 .I 38 I1 656 3.39 27 5 I1D 2 59 1

.3 48 14 866 3.79 18 5 ID 2 36 1

.1 31 10 321 3.19 11 5 ID 2 27 1

.3 29 10 354 3.39 22 5 ID 2 37 1

.l 46 14 480 4.03 22 5 ID 2 41 1

.4 31 15 32 1.89 27 5 ID 2 24 1

1.2 33 11 253 3.8 19 5 I1D 2 48 1 ,1 34 14 435 4.35 19 5 KD 2 35 1 .I 34 12 426 3.39 14 5 ID 2 32 1 ,1 34 13 445 3.10 18 5 ID 3 53 1 .1 13 16 614 3.93 18 5 ID 1 46 1

7.0 70 30 1265 3.96 42 20 8 34 SO 17

2 2 91 .74 .I1 7 125 1.61 2 3 83 .70 .10 6 120 1.68 2 2 65 .43 .06 11 61 .91 2 2 65 .43 .06 8 52 .79 2 2 71 .32 .OB 8 53 . I S

2 2 63 .29 .07 7 40 .52 2 2 78 .19 .17 3 44 .44 2 2 88 .44 -06 8 64 .85 2 3 75 .35 .07 9 84 .99 2 2 68 .32 .06 12 54 .68

73 71 70 65 87

86 118 105 104 114

.IS 4 1.86 .02

.17 2 1.93 .03

.12 3 1.38 .02

.09 2 1.24 .01

.08 4 1.54 .01

, o l 3 1.10 .01 .OS 3 1.63 .01 .Ob 2 1.48 .01 .09 3 1.60 .01 .07 2 1.26 .01

.lo 1

.07 2

.06 1

.05 1

.Ob 2

.04 1

.os 1

.06 1

.os 1

.06 1

605096 605097 605098 605099 605100

bo5101 605102 605103 605104 605 IO5

1 62 13 1 24 19 4 46 15 3 69 8 2 61 10

97 117 85

1ZS 187

2 2 82 .31 .OS 11 56 .70 2 2 62 .29 .13 11 45 .56 2 2 69 -14 .OS 10 45 .49 2 2 BO .29 .12 13 56 .68 2 2 105 .21 .31 5 53 .44

105 100 87 88 168

.07 2 1.48 .01

.07 6 1.08 .01

.os 2 1.17 -01

.07 2 1.27 .01

.OS 4 1.89 .01

. o f ) 1

.06 1

.os 1

.06 1

.06 2

3 41 Xi 1 72 17 1 50 12 2 40 12 3 65 9

22 62 40

189 93 77 60

103

3 2 64 .I9 .12 10 42 -49 2 2 97 .33 .lo 9 40 .64 2 3 73 .27 .06 11 42 .57 3 4 65 .27 .03 12 55 .59 2 2 83 .30 .07 12 57 .70

15 22 67 .48 . I f 36 62 .88

141 100 82 1 IS 106

187

.04 5 1.38 .01 .OB 4 1.23 .01 .OS 2 1.06 .01 .07 6 1.06 .01 .Ob 5 1.33 .01

.09 38 1.73 .08

.06 1

.10 1

.07 1

.Ob 1

.Ob 2

.11 1s STD C 143

A R I T H M E T I C VALUES ZEROS O Y l T T E O

I N T E R V A L ( S T O V / F l 19.688/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 51 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO C L A I M S - W E S N E L R I V E R P R O 4 326

w

!NTERVAL PPM

3.51

8 43

1 3 . 3 5

18.28

23 .10

28 .11

3 3 . 0 4

37.96

42 .89

47 .81

51 .73

57 .65

61.57

67 .49

71 .42

77.34

82 .26

87.18

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

....... ...........

..... ........... . . . . . . . . . ................. .....

... .....

92. 10

97.03

101.95

106.87

111.79

.....

... 116.71

111.64 0 1 0 10

% C% cu

0 . 0 0 .0

0 . 0 0 . 0

0.0 0.0

a .o 2 . 0

2 . 0 3 . 9

7 . 8 11.8

11.8 23.5

5 . 9 19.4

11.8 41 .2

9 . 8 51 .0

17.6 68.6 * * . * Y * * *

5 .9 74 .5

3 .9 78.4

5 . 9 84 .3

0.0 84 .3

0.0 8 4 . 3

0.0 84 .3

0.0 84 .3

2 . 0 86.3

5.9 92.2

2 . 0 94.1

3 . 9 80 .0

0.0 98.0

0.0 98.0

30 4 0 50 60 70 80 90 1 0 0 X OF SAYPLES I N CLASS I N T E R V A L

W L O G A R I T H M I C VALUES

ZEROS O Y I T T E O I N T E R V A L ( S T O V / F ) 0.157/ 4.0 W . S A Y P L E S 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

W

17.59

19.25

21.07

23.06

25.15

27.63

30.15

33 .11

36.24

39.67

43.43

47.54

51.03

5 6 . 9 6

61 .35

68.15

74 .70

81.77

8 9 . 5 1

97 .98

107.25

117.39

128.50

140.66

... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...............

....... ... .....

. . . . . . .

...

153.97 0 io 20 30 4 0 50 60 7 0

% OF SAMPLES IN CLASS I N T E R V A L

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

0.0

0.0

3 .9

5 . 9

7 . 8

7 .8

5 .9

7 . 8

9 .8

15.7

7 . 8

3 . 9

5 . 0

0.0

0.0

1.0

7 . 8

3 . 9

0 .0

0.0

2 .o

80 90 loo

0.0

0.0

a .o 2 .o

2 . 0

5 . 9

11.8

19.6

27.5

33.3

41.2

5 1 .o

66 .7

74.5

78.4

1 4 . 3

84 :3

84 .3

86.3

9 4 . 1

9 8 . 0

9 8 . 0

98 .O

100.0

A R I T + ! M E T I C VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 3.676/ 4 . 0 NOSAMPLES 51 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - W E S N E L RIVER PROJ. 326

P 0 INTERVAL PPM

..... 6 . 3 2

............. 7 . 2 4

8 16

9 . 0 8 . . , . . . . . .

‘O O0 ..... ..... 10.92

. . . . . . . . . 11.84

12.76

13.68

14.59

15.51

16.43

17.35

(8 .27

19.19

20 .11

21 .03

21.95

22.86

. . . . . . . . .

....... .. .....

...

0 i o 20 30 40 50 60 i o 80 eo % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

x C% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 0 0.0

0.0 0.0

5 9 5 . 9

2 . 0 7 . 8

3 . 9 1 1 . 8

5 . 9 ( 1 . 6

5 . 9 23.5

13.7 3 1 . 3

9 .8 4 7 . 1

0.0 41 .1

5 . 9 5 2 . 9 .**.M***

5 , s 50.8

9 . 8 68.6

9 .8 78.4

S . 8 88.2

5 . 9 s 4 . i

0.0 04 .1

3.9 08.0

0.0 98.0

0 . 0 S 8 . 0

0 . 0 98.0

2 . 0 100.0

0.0 100.0

0.0 100.0

1 0 0

3 . 4 1

3.14

4 . 0 s

4 . 4 7

4 .89

5.3s

5.86

6 . 4 1

1 . 0 1

7 .67

8 . 3 9

9 . 1 8

10.05

10 99

12.02

13.16

14.39

15.75

17.23

18.85

20.62

22.56

24.69

21 .01

29.55

...

..... .....

............. . . . . . . . . . .....

............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

..... ...

0 10 20 40 80 60 7 0 % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

80 eo

0.0

2 .o 0.0

0 .0

3.9

0.0

5.9

5.5

0.0

(3 .1

9 .8

5 . 9

0.0

15.7

9 . 8

9 . 8

5 . 9

3.9

0 . 0

0.0

2 .o

0.0

0.0

0.0

1 0 0

5 .9

1 . 8

7 . 8

7 . 8

11.8

11.8

17.6

23.5

23.5

31 .3

41 .1

52 .8

52 .9

68 .6

18.4

88.2

54.1

0 8 . 0

9 8 . 0

98 .0

100.0

1 0 0 . 0

1 0 0 . 0

100.0

IRITWIETIC VILUES ZEROS OMITTED

INTERVbL(STOV/F) 21.920/ 4.0 NO.SAYPLES 51 SOIL S W P L E S - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

2N INTERVbL PPY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30.30

35.78

41.26

46.74

52.22

57.70

63. 18

68.66

74.14

79.62

85.10

90.58

96.06

101.54

f.... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... ........... ............... . . . . . . . . . ... 107 .02

112.W

117.98

123.46

128.94

134.42

139.30

145.38

150.86

156.34

161.82

...

..... *..

...

0

x - - - - - - - - 0.0

0.0

0.0

2.0

0.0

2.0

5.9

9.8

7.8

2 .o 7.8

11.8

15.7

9.8

3.9

3.9

0.0

5.9

3.9

3.9

2 .O

0.0

0.0

0 . 0

10 20 30 40 W 60 70 80 90 100 X OF SAMPLES IN CLASS lNTERVAL

C*

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

2.0

3.9

9.8

19.6

27.5

29.4

37.3

49.0

64.7 .*..y...

74,5

78.4

82.4

82.4

e8 .a

92.2

96.1

98.0

98 .o

98.0

98.0

W

w

49.12

51.89

54.81

57. 89

61.15

64. 59

68.23

72.07

76.12

80.41

84.94

89.72

94.77

1 0 0 . 10

105.73

111.68

117 97

124.61

131.62

139.03

146.86

155.12

163.85

173.08

182.82

.....

.I...........

....... . . . . . . . . . ............. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

. . . . . . .

...

0 10

2 .O

0.0

0.0

2.0

0.0

5.9

2 .0

13.T

2.0

2 . 0

7.8

9.8

13.7

7.8

9.8

3.9

2 .O

7.8

3.9

2.0

0.0

0.0

2 .o

0.0

20 30 40 W 60 70 80 90 1 0 0 X OF SAMPLES IN CLASS INTERVAL

2 .o

2.0

2 . 0

3.9

3.9

9.8

11.8

25.5

27.5

29.4

37.3

47.1

60.8

68.6

78.4

82.4

84.3

92.2

96. t

98.0

08 .0

98.0

100.0

100.0

ARITHMETIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTED

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0.116/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL R I V E R PROJ. 326

V

AC INTERVAL PPM Y CX

0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0

29.4 29.4

0.0 29.4

0.0 29.4

0.0 19.4 ............................... 3 t . 4 60.8

0 . 0 2

0.05

0.08

0.11

0. 14

0.17

0 . 2 0

0.22

0 2s

0.28

0.31

0 . 3 4

0.37

0.40

0.43

0.46

0.49

0.51

0 . S 4

0.Sl

0.60

0.63

0.66

0.69

0.11

..............................

0.0 60.1 * * * . Y * * *

0.0 60.1

................. 17.6 70.4

0 0 78.4

0.0 78.4

0.0 78.4

11.8 90.2

0.0 90.2

0.0 90.2

... 3.9 9 4 . t

0 . 0 94.1

0.0 94.1

..... s.9 100.0

0 . 0 100.0

0.0 100.0

0.0 100.0

0.0 100.0

...........

0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 1 0 0 X OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

LOGARITHYIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTED

INTERVAL(STDV/F) 0.2Sl/ 4.0 W.SAMPLES S1 S O I L SAMPLES - GQNZO CLAIMS - W E S N E L R I V E R PROJ. 326

0.01

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.12

0 . 1 4

0.16

0 . 1 8

0.11

0.24

0.28

0.32

0.37

0.43

0 .so

0.58

0.67

0.77

0.89

1.03

.............................

...............................

.................

........... e..

.....

1.19 0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70

Y OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0 . 0

0.0

0 .0

0.0

0.0

0.0

25.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

31.4

0.0

0.0

17.6

0.0

11.8

3.9

0.0

5.9

0 .0

0 .0

0 . 0

0.0

80 90 1 0 0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

29.4

29.4

29.4

29.4

29.4

60.8

60.1

60.1

78.4

70.4

9 0 . 2

94.1

94.1

100.0

100.0

(00.0

100.0

100.0

ARITWIETIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/ f l 186.145/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 5 1 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

W

W

31.59

8 4 . 2 8

130.97

177.65

224.34

271 03

317.71

364 4 0

d 1 1 . 0 8

457.71

504.46

551.14

..... ........... . . . . . . . . . ...........

....... ............. 397 .a3

..... 644.32

691 .20

731 .89

184.57

831.26

877.93

924.63

971.32

1018.01

1064.69

11 11.38

1158.06

...

.....

0 10 20 30 40 W 60 10 80 X OF SAYPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0 . 0

0.0

0 . 0

0 . 0

2 . 0

0.0

2 . 0

6 . 9

11 .8

9.8

11.8

7 .8

13.1

5 . 9

3 . 9

2 . 0

2 .o

5.9

2 . 0

2 .o

0.0

2 . 0

0.0

2 .o

90 1 0 0

L O G A R I T W I C VALUES ZEROS OYITTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0 .135/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 5 1 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO C L A I Y S - W E S N E L RIVER PROJ. 326

M INTERVAL PPY ________________________________________----------------------------------------------.

235.33

254.40

273.02

297.30

3 2 1 . 4 0

347.45

313.60 ... 406.04 ............ *

. . . . . . . 438.95

414.52

512.98

554.55

599.50

648. 08

700.61

157.38

818.77

883.12

956. 85

1034.40

1 1 1 8 . 2 3

1208.86

1306.83

1412.73

..... . . . . . . . . . ..... ............. ..... ....

... .....

...

.....

1527.23 0 10 2 0 30 40 50 60 10 80

% OF SAMPLES IN CLASS INTERVAL

%

0.0

0.0

0 . 0

0 .0

2 .o

2 .o 3 .9

9 . 8

2 1 . 5

31.4

43 .1

61 .o 6 4 . 1 ....*... 10.6

14 .5

76.5

18 .4

84 .3

86.3

8 8 . 2

88.2

50.2

90.2

92.2

C Y

0.0

2 .o

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 .O

3.9

13.1

7 . 8

5.9

9 . 8

5 . 9

1 3 . 1

9.8

0.0

3 . 9

5.9

2 . 0

3.9

0.0

2 . 0

5 . 9

0 .0

2 .o

so 1 0 0

0.0

2 .o

2 . 0

2 . 0

2 .o 1 . 9

7 . 8

2 1 . 6

25.4

35.3

4 6 . 1

5 1 . 0

6 4 . 7

14 .5

74 .5

18.4

84 .3

86 .3

90.2

90.2

9 2 . 2

9 8 . 0

98.0

100.0

A R I T W E T I C VALUES ZEROS OMlTTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0.396/ 4.0 NO.SAMPLES 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

2.70

2 . 8 0

2 . 8 0

3.00

3.10

3.20

3.30

3.40

3.49

3.59

3 69

3.79

3.89

3 99

4.09

4.19

4.29

4.39

4.48

4.S8

4.68

4.78

4.88

4.98

5 . 0 8

...

.....

.............

...........

...

.....

..... .....

.................

...

...

0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 10 % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0 . 0

2 . 0

2 . 0

0.0

3.9

2 . 0

5 . 9

2 . 0

2 . 0

1 3 . 1

11.8

3.9

5.9

5 . 9

5.8

17.6

3.9

3.9

2.0

0 . 0

2 .o 0.0

0 .0

0 .0

80 90 1 0 0

3.9

5.9

7 . 8

7.8

11.8

1 3 . 1

19.6

21.6

23.5

3 1 . 3

49.0

52.9

58.8 .... M...

64.1

7 0 . 6

88.2

92.2

96.1

98.0

98.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

L O C A R I T H l l C VALUES ZEROS O M I l 7 E O

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0.042/ 4 .0 NO.SAYPLES S I S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - W E S N E L R I V E R PROJ. 326

FE CX

2.91

2.98

3.05

3.13

3 . 1 0

3.28

3.36

3.4s

3.s3

3.62

3 . 1 1

3.80

3.89

3.99

4.09

4.18

4.29

4.40

4 .SO

4.62

4.73

4 .8s

4.97

5.09

5.21

...

.....

..... . . . . . . . . . ..... * ..... ... ..... ..... ..... ...................

...

0 10 20

1 .o 0.0

0.0

3.9

2.0

2 .O

5.0

0.0

5.9

9.8

11.8

3.9

5.9

5 . 9

5.9

19.6

2 .O

3.9

2 .O

2 . 0

0.0

0 .0

0 .0

2 .o

x) 4 0 SO 60 70 80 m 1 0 0 X OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

5.9

5.9

5.9

5.8

11.8

13.7

19.6

(9.6

25.5

35.3

47.1

s1 .o 56.9

6 2 . 1

68.6

8 8 . 2

90.2

94.1

96.1

88.0

98.0

98 .o

98.0

100.0

A R I T H M E T I C VALUES ZEROS OMITTED

I N T E R V 4 L t S T O V / F ) 3.080/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO C L A I M S - W E S N E L R I V E R PROJ. 326

I N T E R V A L PPM

0 . 7 1

1.48

2 .15

3.02

3 .79

4 .56

5 . 3 3

6 . 1 0

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... .....

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . 6 . 8 7

7.64

8 .41

9.18

9.95

.................

... ......

................... ... 10.72

11.49

12.26

13.03

13.80

14.51

15.34

16.11

16.08

17.65

18.42

.....

.....

...

13.19 0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3 .9

5 . 9

7 . 8

0.0

9 . 8

17.6

9 . 8

0.0

19.6

3.9

0.0

5 . 9

0.0

5 . 9

3 .9

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

0.0

10 20 30 4 0 5 0 6 0 70 80 90 1 0 0 % OF SAMPLES I N C L A S S I N T E R V A L

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

3 .9

9 . 8

17 .6

17.6

27.5

45 .1

5 4 . 9

5 4 . 9 .... M...

74 .5

78.4

78.4

84 .3

84.3

00 .2

94.1

9 4 . 4

94 .1

94 .1

96 .1

ss . l

3 .58

3 .87

4 . 1 7

4 . 5 1

4 . 8 6

5 .25

5 .67

6 . 1 2

6 . 6 1

7.14

7 .70

8.32

8.98

9 . 7 0

10.47

11 30

12.20

13.17

14 22

18.35

16.58

17.00

19.32

20.86

22.52

...

.....

. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . .

.................

. . . . . . . . . ............. f..... ...

..... ..... ...

0 10 20

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

0.0

5 . 9

0.0

7 .8

0.0

9 . 8

0.0

17.6

0.0

9 .8

19.6

3 . 9

0.0

5.9

5 . 9

3 .9

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

0 0

2 . 0

30 4 0 50 60 7 0 00 80 lo0 % OF SAMPLES I N C L A S S I N T E R V A L

0.0

3 . 9

3 . 9

3.5

9.8

9 .8

17.6

17.6

2 7 . 5

27.6

45 .1

45 .1

54 .9

74.5

78.4

70.4

84.3

90.2

94 .1

94 .1

9 4 . 1

96 .1

9 6 . 1

9 8 . 0

ARITHMETIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTEPVAL(STOV/FI 0 .181/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 5 1 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - WESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

CA INTERVAL PPM

0.04

0.09

0 .13

0 .18

0 . 2 2

0 . 2 7

0 . 3 2

0 .36

0 4 1

0 . 4 5

0 . 5 0

0 . 5 4

0 . 5 9

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

.... .....

........... ..... ...........

...... ...

. . . . . . . . .

w

0.63

0.68

0 . 7 2

0 . 7 7

0 . 8 1

0 . 8 6

0 . 9 0

0 . 9 5

0 . 9 9

1 .w

1 . 0 8

1.13

..... ... ...

... .....

0

0 . 0

0 .0

0 .0

2 .o

0.0

7 . 8

9 .8

2 . 0

11.8

5 .9

11 .8

9 .8

9 . 8

5 . 0

3 .9

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

5.9

2 .o

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

10 20 30 40 ta 60 70 IK, so 100 % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0 . 0

0.0

0.0

2 .o

1 .o 9 . 8

19.6

2 1 . 6

33.3

39 .1

5 1 . 0

60 .0 * . . -y . r .

70 .6

76 .5

80.4

8 4 . 3

8 4 . 3

88.2

9 4 . 1

%. 1

06.1

m. 1

9 6 . 1

96 .1

W L O G A R I T W I C VALUES

ZEROS OMITTEO INTERVAL(SlOV/F) 0.142/ 4 . 0 W.SAMPLES 5 $

S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - WESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

w

0 . 1 9

0.21

0.23

0 . 2 5

0 . 2 7

0 . 2 9

0 . 3 2

0 . 3 5

0 . 3 8

0 . 4 1

0 . 4 4

0 . 4 8

0 . 5 2

0 .57

0 . 6 1

0 . 6 7

0 . 7 1

0 . 7 9

0.8s

0 . 9 3

1 .oo

...

..... ...

. . . . . . .

.... ..... ...........

............. ...... ... ... ... ... ....... 1.09 . 1 . 1 8

1 . 2 8

1.39 0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

3 . 9

2 .o

5.9

3.9

2 . 0

7 .8

9.8

11.8

2 .O

13.7

0 . 8

3 . 9

3.9

3.9

T . 8

0 . 0

0.0

2 .o

2 . 0

0.0

40 M 60 70 80 so too 20 30 % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

2 .o 2 . 0

2 .o 3.9

7.8

9 . 8

15.7

19.6

21.6

29.4

39.2

51.0

51.0

66.7

76.5

80.4

84.3

88.2

96,5

9 6 . 1

96.1

98.0

100.0

100.0

ARITHYETlC VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/FI 0.031/ 4.0 NO.SAYPLES 5 1 SOIL SAYPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 316

. . . . . . . . . 0 . 0 5

0.06

0.06

0 .07

................. .............

.....*. 0.08

. . . . . . . 0.09

........... 0 . 10

... 0 . 1 0

0 .11

... 0 . 1 2

0.13

0 . 1 4

0 .14

0 .15

0.16

0 .17

0 .17

0 . 18

.....

.....

0 . 1 9 0 to 20 30 4 0 50 60 70 x OF SAYPLES IN CLASS INTERVAL

INTERVAL PPM

13.7

1.8

0.0

1 .8

11.8

3.9

0 . 0

3.8

0.0

0.0

5.9

0 .0

2 .o 5 . 9

0.0

0.0

80 m 100

49 .0

56.9

56.9 .r..y*..

84.1

16.5

80.4

80.4

84.3

04.3

8 4 . 3

30.2

m.2

92.2

98.0

98.0

98.0

0 .02

0.03

0.03

0.03

0.04

0 . 0 4

0 . 0 4

0 . 0 5

0.05

0.06

0 . 0 1

.....

. . . . . . . . .

................. ............. ....... 0.07

0.08

0.09

0 . 10

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 2

0 13

0 . 1 5

0.16

0.18

0 2 0

0 . 2 2

0 . 2 4

8 , 0 . 2 7

. . . . . . .

........... ... ...

.. e.... .....

0 10

Lx.cut1on t .r l iMtod 0 1 : 2 0 : 5 5

0 . 0

0.0

2 . 0

0.0

0.0

5 .9

0.0

9 .8

0 . 0

17.6

13.1

1 . 8

0 . 0

1 .8

11.8

3.9

3 . 8

0 .0

1 .8

5 . 9

0 . 0

2 . 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

2 0 30 40 5 0 60 10 BO 90 (00 % OF SIYPLES IN CLASS INTERVIL

1.0.798 R C . 0 r2.01

0.0

0.0

2 .o

a .O

2 .o 7 . 8

1.8

11.6

17.6

35 .3

49 .0

56.9

5 6 . 9

64.7

76 .5

80 .4

84.3

84 .3

9 2 . 2

98 .o 88 .O

100.0

100.0

100.0

ARITWIETIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

I N T E R V A L ( S T O V / F ) 16.2531 4 . 0 W.SAMPLES 5 1 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLIIYS - W E S N E L RIVER PROJ. 326

CR INTERVAL PPY

18 1 1

w 22.17

26.24

30.30

3 4 . 3 6

38.43

42.49

46.55

50.62

54 .68

58.74

6 2 . 8 1

6 6 . 8 1

70 .93

75 .00

79.06

83 .12

87 . 19

91.25

95 .31

99.38

103.44

107.50

111.57

115.63

...

.....

... .....

..... .... ........... ..... ........... ........ ... .....

...

... 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 80

% OF SAMPLES I N CLASS I N l E R V A L

- _ _ -

eo

x CX

0 . 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

0.0

0.0

3.0

5 . 9

3 .9

5 . 9

9 .8

11.8

5 . 9

11.8

9 .8

3 . 9

5 . 9

2 . 0

2 . 0

0.0

3.9

0.0

0 . 0

3.9

0.0

1 0 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

0 .0

0.0

3 . 0

0 .8

13.1

19.6

29.4

41.2

47 .1

18.8 .... M...

68.6

72.5

78.4

80.4

82.4

82.4

86.3

86.3

86.3

50.2

90.2

LOGARITHYIC VALUES ZEROS MlZTTED

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0 .1201 4 . 0 NO.SAYPLES 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - W E S N E L R I V E R PROJ. 326

W 1,

29.44

31.55

33.82

36.24

31.84

41.63

44.61

47.11

51.21

54. 92

58.86

63.08

67 .60

12.45

17.65

03 .22

89 .19

95 .59

102.45

1oB.19

117.67

126.11

135.16

144.05

... , ... ... ..... . . . . . . . . . .........*. . . . . . . . . ...... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . **.

... ...

..... ... 155.24

0 1 0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 .o 3 . 9

3 .9

3.9

5 . 9

9 . 8

11.8

9 . 8

9 .8

9 . 8

7 .8

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

3 . 9

0.0

6 . 9

3 . 9

0.0

0.0

2 0 30 4 0 50 60 70 80 90 160 X OF SAMPLCS I N CLASS INTERVAL

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

5.9

9.8

(3 .7

19.6

29.4

41.2

51.0

60.8

10.6

78.4

82 .4

82.4

86.3

60.2

90.2

96 .1

1 0 0 . 0

1 0 0 . 0

100.0

W

w

0 . 4 2

0 . 4 7

0 . 5 3

0 . 5 8

0 .64

0 . 6 9

0 . 7 5

0 . 8 0

0.86

0 . 9 1

0 . 9 7

1.03

1.08

1.14

1.19

1.25

1.30

1.36

1 .41

1.47

1.52

1.58

1.64

1 .69

1.75

...

..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............. .............

.....

.....

... ...

0

2 . 0

2 . 0

0 .0

0.0

2 . 0

2 - 0

3 . 9

5 .9

5 . 9

9 . 8

9 . 8

1 3 . 1

13.7

2 . 0

0 .0

5 .9

2 . 0

5 . 9

3 . 9

3 . 9

0.0

2 .O

2 . 0

0 .0

LOCARITHYIC VbLUES ZEROS OMITTED

INTERVAL(STOV/F) O . W 2 / 4 . 0 NO.SbMPLES 51 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - QUFSNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

2 .o 3.0

3 . 9

3 . 9

5 . 9

7 .8

11.8

17.6

23 .5

33.3

4 3 . 1

56 .9

70 .6 ....M...

7 1 . 6

12 .5

78.4

80.4

86.3

90.2

94.1

9 4 . 1

96 .1

08.0

9 8 . 0

0 . 5 6

0.60

0 .63

0.66

0 . 7 0

0 . 7 4

0 .78

0 . 8 2

0.86

0 . 9 1

0 .96

1.01

1.07

... ... ...*. ....... ... ..... * * . . . . . . . . ...............

0.0

0 .0

0.0

2 . 0

2 . 0

2 . 0

3 . 9

3 . 9

5 . 9

7 .8

9 . 8

9 . 0

15.7

..... 1.13

1.19

1.25

1.32

1.40

1.47

1.55

1.64

1.73

... ....... ... ...

1 . 8 2

1.92

2.03 0

5 . 9

2 .o 3 . 9

7.8

3 . 9

3.9

2 .o

2 . 0

0 . 0

2 . 0

0 .0

10 2 0 30 4 0 SO 60 7 0 80 W $00 X OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

3.9

3 . 9

3 . 9

5 . 9

7 . 8

9 . 8

13.7

17.6

23.5

31.4

4 1 . 2

51 .o 66.7

72.5

74.5

78.4 9

86.3

90.2

94.1

9 6 . 1

0 8 . 0

98 .0

100.0

100.0

A R I T H M E T I C VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

I N T E P V A L ( S T O V / F ) 16.809/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 51 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO C L A I M S - OUESNEL R I V E R P R O J . 326

W

I N T E R V A L PPM

35.13

39.94

44.14

48.34

52.54

56.15

6 0 . 9 5

65 .15

69 .35

73 .56

77.76

81.96

86.16

90 .37

96.57

98.17

102.97

107. 17

111.38

115.58

119.78

123.98

128.19

132.39

136.S9

...

... ..... . . . . . . . . .

... ................... .............

... ... ........... ...

...

0.0

0 . 0

2 .o

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

5 . 9

9 .8

2 . 0

3 .9

19.6

13.7

2 . 0

3 .9

3 . 9

11.8

3 . 9

2 .o

3.9

0.0

0 .0

0 .0

0 .0

0 10 2 0 30 4 0 50 60 7 0 80 SO $00 X OF SAMPLES IN CLASS I N T E R V A L

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

2 . 0

5 . 9

5 . 9

9 . 8

15.7

25 .5

27.5

31.4

5 1 . 0

64.7 ....M...

6 6 . 7

70.6

74 .5

86.3

9 0 . 2

9 2 . 2

96.

96.

96.

96.

%.

4 9 . 4 4

51.83

54.34

56.97

59 .73

62.62

65.65

68.83

72.16

75.65

79 .31

83 .15

07.17

91 .39

95.82

100.45

105.32

110.41

115.76

121.36

127.23

133.39

139.85

146.62

153.71

... ..... .......

... . . . . . . . . .

...I........... . . . . . . . . .

..... ........... .....

...

0 10

0 0

2 0

2 0

0 0

0 0

3 9

5 9

7 8

2 0

3 9

9 8

15 7

9 8

2 0

5.9

1 1 8

5 9

2 0

35

0 0

0 0

2 0

0 0

0 0

20 30 4 0 50 60 70 80 SO '00 X OF SAMPLES I N C L A S S I N T E R V A L

2 . 0

3 .9

5 . 0

5.9

5 . 9

9 . 8

15.7

23.5

25.5

29.4

39 .2

5 4 . 9

64.7

66.7

72.5

8 4 . 3

€30.2

92.2

96.1

96. 1

9 6 . 1

9 8 . 0

98 .o

98 .o

,


INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0.030/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLLS 5 1 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL RIVER PROJ. 326

..... 0 .07

0.08 ... . . . . . . . . . 0.08

0.09

0. i o

0 .19

0 . 1 1

0 . 12

0 . 1 3

0 . 1 4

0. 94

0 . 1 5

0 . 1 6

0 .17

0. 17

0 .18

0. 19

0 . 2 0

0.20

. . . . . . . ........... ...........

. . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . .............

... . . . . . . .

0 . 2 1 0 10

0.0

0.0

2 .o

2 .o

0.0

5 . 9

3 . 9

9 . 8

0.0

7 .8

11.8

11.8

0.0

9 .8

9 .8

13.7

0.0

3.9

7 .8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2o 30 4 0 w 60 70 80 rn 100 X OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

3 . 8

3 .9

9.8

13.7

23.5

23.5

31.4

43 .1

54 .9

5 4 . 9 .*..M...

64.7

74.5

88.2

08.2

92.2

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

0.06

0.06

0.06

0 . 0 7

0 .07 .....

0.08 ... 0 .08

. . . . . . . . , 0.09

0.09

. . . . . . . 0 . 1 0

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 2

0 . 1 3

0 .13

0.1.

0 . 1 5

0 .16

0 .17

........I..

........... . . . . . . . . . .... * .... ............. ... . . . . . . . 0 . 18

0 . 2 0

0 . 2 1

0 . 2 2

0.24

0 .25 0 10

2 .o

0.0

0.0

5 .9

0.0

3.9

0.0

9 8

0.0

7 .8

11.8

0.0

11.8

9.8

9 . 8

13 7

3 .9

7 . 8

0.0

0.0

0.0

0 .0

0.0

0 .0

20 30 4 0 so 60 70 80 Bo wo % O F SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

3.9

3.9

3.9

9.8

9 .0

13.7

93.7

23.5

23,5

31 .4

43 .1

43 .1

54 .9

64 .7

14 .5

88.2

92.2

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

900.0

100.0

100.0

INTERVAL PPU

1 . 0 1

1 08

1 15

- _ - -


INTERVAL(STDV/F) 0.280/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMPLES 51 SOIL SIMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - W E S N E L RIVER PRO& 326

AL

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

... 1.22

1.29

1.36

1.43

1.50

1 57

1.64

1.71

1.78

1 . 8 S

1 .92

1.99

2 . 0 6

2 . 1 3

2 . 2 0

2 .27

2.34

2 .41

2.48

2.55

2 .62

... . . . . . . .

...

...

...

.....

............... ................. . . . . . . . . . ... .....

...

2 .69 0 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 100

X OF SAMPLES IN CLASS INTERVAL

Y _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - 0.0

2 .o

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

3 .9

7 .a

3 . 9

3 .9

3 .9

5 . 9

0.0

15.7

17.6

9 . 8

3 .9

5 .9

2 .o 2 . 0

3 . 9

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

CX

0 . 0

2 .o

2 . 0

5 . 9

5 . 9

9 . 8

17.6

21 .6

2 5 . 5

29.4

31.3

35.3

s 1 . 0 .... M...

68 .6

78.4

82.4

88 .2

8 0 . 2

92.2

06 .1

96 .1

96 .1

96.1

96 .1

1.15

1 - 2 0

1.25

1.30

1.35

1.40

1.46

1.52

1.58

1.6s

1.71

1.78

1.80

1.93

2 . 0 1

2 . 0 9

2 .18

2 .26

2.36

2.45

2.55

2 .66

2.76

2.88

2 .99

... ... ...

...

... ... .....

................... ................. . . . . . . .

. . . . . . .

.*.

0 10 2 0

0.0

2 .o 2 . 0

0.0

3 .9

3 . 9

3 . 9

3 . 9

3 . 9

3 . 9

5.9

0.0

19.6

17.6

7 .8

7 .8

2 . 0

3 .9

2 . 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

2 . 0

0 . 0

0 . 0

30 40 SO 60 70 80 90 1 0 0 7, OF SAMPLES IN CLASS INTERVAL

2 .0

3.9

5 . 9

5.9

9 . 8

13.7

17.6

21.6

25.5

29.4

3 5 . 3

35.3

54 .9

7 2 . 5

80.4

88 .2

90.2

94 .1

9 6 . 1

96. 1

96.1

9 8 . 0

9 8 . 0

9 8 . 0

ARITHYETIC VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTERVAL(STOV/F) 0.023/ 4 . 0 NO.SAMCLES 51 SOIL SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - WESNEL RIVER PRO& 326

w 0.01

0.01

0 . 0 2

0 . 0 2

0.03

0.03

0 .04

0 . 0 5

0 . 0 5

0.06

0.06

0.07

.............

.........................

....................... 0.07

........... 0.08

0.08

0 .09

0 . 1 0

0 . 1 0

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 2

0 . 1 2

0 .13

0 .14

0. 14

...

...

...

...

0 10

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 .o 13.7

0.0

25.5

0.0

23.5

0.0

11.8

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

0.0

2 .o

2 .o

20 30 4 0 SO 60 7 0 80 90 1 0 0 X OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

15.7

15.7

4 1 . 1

41.2

64.7

6 4 . 7 ....M...

76.5

80.4

80.4

8 4 . 3

84 .3

88.2

8 8 . 1

92.2

9 2 . 2

94 .1

96 .1

L O G A R I T W I C VALUES ZEROS OMITTEO

INTERVALISTOV/F) 0.121/ 4 .0 NO.SAMPLLS 61 S O I L SAMPLES - GONZO CLAIMS - OUESNEL R I V E R PROJ. 326

w

0.03

0.03

0.04

0.04

0.04

0 . 0 4

0.05

0 .05

0 . 0 5

0.06

0.06

0 .07

.............

..........................

...................... 1

0.0

0.0

0.0

2 . 0

0.0

0.0

0.0

13.7

0.0

25.5

0.0

23.5 0 . 0 7

0.08

0.08

0.09

0 . 0 9

0 . 1 0

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 1

0 . 1 2

0 . 1 3

0. 14

0 . 15

0 16

...........

... ...

... ...

0 10

0.0

11.8

0.0

3 .9

3 . 9

0.0

3 . 9

3 .9

2 .O

2 .O

0.0

0.0

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1 0 0 % OF SAMPLES I N CLASS INTERVAL

0.0

0.0

0.0

a .o 2 .o

2 .o

2 .o

15.7

15.7

41.2

41.2

6 4 . 7

6 4 . 7

76.5

76.5

8 0 . 4 9

84 .3

84.3

.sa.z

92.2

94 .1

9 6 . 1

9 6 . 1

86.1

APPENDIX 111

Affidavit of Expenses

W AFFIDAVIT OF EXPENSES

W

This will certify that the work program covered by this report was carried out during the period June 11 and 12, 1986 on the GONZO Claims, Cariboo Mining Division, Maud Lake area, British Columbia, to the value of the following:

Mobilization and Fieldwork

Salaries D. Brownlee J. Gravel D. Sorenson B. Stewart

Room and board Geochemical analysis Telephone and Office Supplies Equipment Leasing Material & Supplies Transportation

Report Preparation

Salaries D. Allen D. MacQuarrie J. Gravel

Computer Processing Maps, Draughting, Typing, Compilation, Photocopying

200.00 $ 800.00

135.00 150.00 141.88 785.57

75.89 174.50

19.25 78.19

400.00 80.00

200.00 200.00

1,266.99 340.00

TOTAL $5,047 -27

Donald G. Allen P. Eng. (B.C.)

7% 1 exploration itd. geology geophysics mining …

Documents