3.1 aesthetics - acgov.org
TRANSCRIPT
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐1
October 2014ICF 00323.08
3.1 Aesthetics Thissectionidentifiesandevaluatesissuesrelatedtovisualresourcesintheprogramandprojectareas.
TheExistingConditionsdiscussionbelowdescribesthecurrentsetting.Thepurposeofthisinformationistoestablishtheexistingenvironmentalcontextagainstwhichthereadercanunderstandtheenvironmentalchangescausedbytheproposedprogramandindividualprojects.Theenvironmentalsettinginformationisintendedtobedirectlyorindirectlyrelevanttothesubsequentdiscussionofimpacts.Forexample,thesettingidentifiesgroupsofpeoplewhohaveviewsoftheprogramandprojectareasbecausetherepoweringactivitiescouldchangetheirviewsandexperiences.
TheenvironmentalchangesassociatedwiththeprogramandthetwoindividualprojectsarediscussedinSection3.1.3,EnvironmentalImpacts.Thissectionidentifiesimpacts,describeshowtheywouldoccur,andprescribesmitigationmeasurestoreducesignificantimpacts,ifnecessary.
3.1.1 Concepts and Terminology
Identifyingaprojectarea’svisualresourcesandconditionsinvolvesthreesteps.
1. Objectiveidentificationofthevisualfeatures(visualresources)ofthelandscape.
2. Assessmentofthecharacterandqualityofthoseresourcesrelativetooverallregionalvisualcharacter.
3. Determinationoftheimportancetopeople,orsensitivity,ofviewsofvisualresourcesinthelandscape.
Theaestheticvalueofanareaisameasureofitsvisualcharacterandquality,combinedwiththeviewerresponsetothearea(FederalHighwayAdministration1988).Scenicqualitycanbestbedescribedastheoverallimpressionthatanindividualviewerretainsafterdrivingthrough,walkingthrough,orflyingoveranarea(U.S.BureauofLandManagement1980).Viewerresponseisacombinationofviewerexposureandviewersensitivity.Viewerexposureisafunctionofthenumberofviewers,numberofviewsseen,distanceoftheviewers,andviewingduration.Viewersensitivityrelatestotheextentofthepublic’sconcernforaparticularviewshed.Thesetermsandcriteriaaredescribedindetailbelow.
Visual Character
Naturalandartificiallandscapefeaturescontributetothevisualcharacterofanareaorview.Visualcharacterisinfluencedbygeologic,hydrologic,botanical,wildlife,recreational,andurbanfeatures.Urbanfeaturesincludethoseassociatedwithlandscapesettlementsanddevelopment,includingroads,utilities,structures,earthworks,andtheresultsofotherhumanactivities.Theperceptionofvisualcharactercanvarysignificantlyseasonally,evenhourly,asweather,light,shadow,andelementsthatcomposetheviewshedchange.Thebasiccomponentsusedtodescribevisualcharacterformostvisualassessmentsaretheelementsofform,line,color,andtextureofthelandscapefeatures(U.S.ForestService1995;FederalHighwayAdministration1988).Theappearanceofthelandscapeisdescribedintermsofthedominanceofeachofthesecomponents.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐2
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Visual Quality
Visualqualityisevaluatedusingthewell‐establishedapproachtovisualanalysisadoptedbyFederalHighwayAdministration,employingtheconceptsofvividness,intactness,andunity(FederalHighwayAdministration1988;Jonesetal.1975),whicharedescribedbelow.
Vividnessisthevisualpowerormemorabilityoflandscapecomponentsastheycombineinstrikinganddistinctivevisualpatterns.
Intactnessisthevisualintegrityofthenaturalandhuman‐builtlandscapeanditsfreedomfromencroachingelements;thisfactorcanbepresentinwell‐kepturbanandrurallandscapes,andinnaturalsettings.
Unityisthevisualcoherenceandcompositionalharmonyofthelandscapeconsideredasawhole;itfrequentlyatteststothecarefuldesignofindividualcomponentsinthelandscape.
Visualqualityisevaluatedbasedontherelativedegreeofvividness,intactness,andunity,asmodifiedbyitsvisualsensitivity.High‐qualityviewsarehighlyvivid,relativelyintact,andexhibitahighdegreeofvisualunity.Low‐qualityviewslackvividness,arenotvisuallyintact,andpossessalowdegreeofvisualunity.
Visual Exposure and Sensitivity
Themeasureofthequalityofaviewmustbetemperedbytheoverallsensitivityoftheviewer.Viewersensitivityorconcernisbasedonthevisibilityofresourcesinthelandscape,proximityofviewerstothevisualresource,elevationofviewersrelativetothevisualresource,frequencyanddurationofviews,numberofviewers,andtypeandexpectationsofindividualsandviewergroups.
Theimportanceofaviewisrelatedinparttothepositionoftheviewertotheresource;therefore,visibilityandvisualdominanceoflandscapeelementsdependontheirplacementwithintheviewshed.Aviewshedisdefinedasallofthesurfaceareavisiblefromaparticularlocation(e.g.,anoverlook)orsequenceoflocations(e.g.,aroadwayortrail)(FederalHighwayAdministration1988).Toidentifytheimportanceofviewsofaresource,aviewshedmustbebrokenintodistancezonesofforeground,middleground,andbackground.Generally,thecloseraresourceistotheviewer,themoredominantitisandthegreateritsimportancetotheviewer.Althoughdistancezonesinaviewshedmayvarybetweendifferentgeographicregionortypesofterrain,thestandardforegroundzoneis0.25–0.5milefromtheviewer,themiddlegroundzonefromtheforegroundzoneto3–5milesfromtheviewer,andthebackgroundzonefromthemiddlegroundtoinfinity(Jonesetal.1975).
Visualsensitivitydependsonthenumberandtypeofviewersandthefrequencyanddurationofviews.Visualsensitivityisalsomodifiedbyvieweractivity,awareness,andvisualexpectationsinrelationtothenumberofviewersandviewingduration.Forexample,visualsensitivityisgenerallyhigherforviewsseenbypeoplewhoaredrivingforpleasure,peopleengaginginrecreationalactivitiessuchashiking,bikingorcamping,andhomeowners.Sensitivitytendstobelowerforviewsseenbypeopledrivingtoandfromworkoraspartoftheirwork(U.S.ForestService1995;FederalHighwayAdministration1988;U.S.SoilConservationService1978).Commutersandnonrecreationaltravelersgenerallyhavefleetingviewsandtendtofocusoncommutetraffic,notonsurroundingscenery;therefore,theyaregenerallyconsideredtohavelowvisualsensitivity.Residentialviewerstypicallyhaveextendedviewingperiodsandareconcernedaboutchangesintheviewsfromtheirhomes;therefore,theyaregenerallyconsideredtohavehighvisualsensitivity.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐3
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Viewersusingrecreationtrailsandareas,scenichighways,andscenicoverlooksareusuallyassessedashavinghighvisualsensitivity.
Judgmentsofvisualqualityandviewerresponsemustbemadebasedinaregionalframeofreference(U.S.SoilConservationService1978).Thesamelandformorvisualresourceappearingindifferentgeographicareascouldhaveadifferentdegreeofvisualqualityandsensitivityineachsetting.Forexample,asmallhillmaybeasignificantvisualelementonaflatlandscapebuthaveverylittlesignificanceinmountainousterrain.
3.1.2 Existing Conditions
Regulatory Setting
Federal
ThefederalgovernmentdoesnotexplicitlyregulatevisualqualitybutrecognizesitsimportanceandpreservesaestheticvaluesthroughtheNationalPark,NationalWildlifeRefuge,NationalMonument,andNationalScenicBywaySystems.
State
Interstate580(I‐580)fromtheSanJoaquinCountylinetoStateRoute(SR)205(PostMiles0.0to0.393),a0.4milelongsegment,isastate‐designatedscenichighway(CaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation2012).TheI‐580intersectionwithSR205fallsjustwithintheeasternborderoftheprogramarea.
Local
Alameda County General Plan
Scenic Route Element
TheScenicRouteElementoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan(ScenicRouteElement)providesacontinuous,countywidescenicroutesystemandisintendedtoserveasaguideforlocaljurisdictionsfordevelopmentofcity‐scalescenicroutesystemsandasaguidefordevelopmenttoprotectandenhancethescenicvaluesalongdesignatedscenicroutes(AlamedaCounty1966).
TheScenicRouteElementidentifiesscenicfreewaysandexpresswaysastraversingorconnectingareasofmajorscenic,recreational,orculturalattractions,andasdistinctfromtwoothermajortypesofscenicroutes(scenicthoroughfaresandrural‐recreationroutes).Scenicroutesaredefinedtoconsistofthreeelements:theright‐of‐way,thesceniccorridor,andareasextendingbeyondthecorridor.Thecorridorisdefinedasthoseproperties,alongandupto1,000feetbeyondtheright‐of‐way,thateither(1)shouldbeacquiredforprotection,or(2)forwhichdevelopmentcontrolsshouldbeappliedtopreserveandenhancenearbyviewsormaintainunobstructeddistantviewsalongtherouteinruralareaswithhighscenicqualities.Morespecifically,sceniccorridorsaredefinedasthoseareaswhere“Developmentcontrolsshouldbeappliedtopreserveandenhancescenicqualities,restrictunsightlyuseofland,controlheightofstructures,andprovidesitedesignandarchitecturalguidancealongtheentiresceniccorridor”(AlamedaCounty1966).Fortheareasextendingbeyondsceniccorridors(i.e.,beyond1,000feetfromtheright‐of‐way),theScenicRouteElementalsorequiresbasicdevelopmentcontrols:intheundevelopedpartsofthecounty,project
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐4
October 2014ICF 00323.08
reviewshouldaddressgrading,removalofvegetation,streambeds,landscaping,utilityandcommunicationtowers,polesandlines,andoutdooradvertisingsignsorstructures.
Theprogramareacontainsonestate‐designatedscenicroute,I‐580,whichisalsocategorizedasoneoftheCounty’sScenicFreewaysandExpressways.MostoftheotherroadsandhighwaysthattraversetheprogramareaarecategorizedasScenicRural‐RecreationRoutes(orasmappedMajorRuralRoads);thesearelistedbelow(AlamedaCounty1966).
AltamontPassRoad
Byron‐BethanyRoad
FlynnRoad
GrantLineRoad
MountainHouseRoad
PattersonPassRoad
ProposedRoute239Freeway
TeslaRoad
VascoRoad
TheScenicRouteElementprovidesthefollowingprinciplesforScenicRouteCorridorsthatmayapplytotherepoweringprogramaswellastheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects.Theprinciplesareorganizedlooselyunderfiveheadings:thesystem,therights‐of‐way,thecorridors,thecorridorsandtheremainderorbalanceoftheCounty,andareasbeyondthecorridors.Forreferenceinthesubsequentdiscussions,eachprincipleisidentifiedbyacode(e.g.,SRE‐Corr‐1).
ProvideforNormalUsesofLandandProtectAgainstUnsightlyFeatures:Inbothurbanandruralareas,normallypermittedusesoflandshouldbeallowedinsceniccorridors,exceptthatpanoramicviewsandvistasshouldbepreservedandenhancedthroughsupplementingnormalzoningregulationswithspecialheight,area,andsideyardregulations;throughprovidingarchi‐tecturalandsitedesignreview;throughprohibitionandremovalofbillboards,signsnotrelevanttothemainuseoftheproperty,obtrusivesigns,automobilewreckingandjunkyards,andsimilarunsightlydevelopmentoruseofland.Designandlocationofallsignsshouldberegulatedtopreventconglomerationsofunsightlysignsalongroadsides.(SRE‐Corr‐1).
LocateTransmissionTowersandLinesOutsideofScenicRouteCorridorsWhenFeasible:Newoverheadtransmissiontowersandlinesshouldnotbelocatedwithinsceniccorridorswhenitisfeasibletolocatethemelsewhere.(SRE‐Corr‐2).
UndergroundUtilityDistributionLinesWhenFeasible;MakeOverheadLinesInconspicuous:New,relocatedorexistingutilitydistributionlinesshouldbeplacedundergroundwheneverfeasible.Whenitisnotfeasibletoplacelinesunderground,theyshouldbelocatedsoastobeinconspicuousfromthescenicroute.Polesofanimproveddesignshouldbeusedwhereverpossible.Combinedoradjacentrights‐of‐wayandcommonpolesshouldbeusedwhereverfeasible.(SRE‐Corr‐3).
UseLandscapingtoIncreaseScenicQualitiesofScenicRouteCorridors:Landscapingshouldbedesignedandmaintainedinscenicroutecorridorstoprovideaddedvisualinterest,toframescenicviews,andtoscreenunsightlyviews.(SRE‐Corr‐5).
ControlTreeRemoval:Nomaturetreesshouldberemovedwithoutpermissionofthelocaljurisdictionasameansofpreservingthescenicqualityofthecounty.(SRE‐Corr/Rem‐5).
ControlAlterationofStreambedsandBodiesofWater:Alterationofstreambedsorbodiesofwaterandadjacentvegetationshouldbepermittedonlywithapprovalofthelocaljurisdiction,asameansof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐5
October 2014ICF 00323.08
preservingthenaturalscenicqualityofthestreamcourses,bodiesofwater,vegetationandwildlifeinthecounty.Developmentalongedgesofstreams,canals,reservoirs,andotherbodiesofwatershouldbedesignedandtreatedsoastoresultinnaturalistic,architectural,orsculpturalforms.(SRE‐Corr/Rem‐6).
PreserveandEnhanceNaturalScenicQualitiesinAreasBeyondtheScenicCorridor:Viewsfromscenicrouteswillcompriseessentiallyalloftheremainderofthecountybeyondthelimitsofthesceniccorridor:thecorridorisintendedtoestablishaframeworkfortheobservationoftheviewsbeyond.Therefore,inallareasinthecountyextendingbeyondthescenicroutecorridors,scenicqualitiesshouldbepreservedthroughretainingthegeneralcharacterofnaturalslopesandnaturalformations,andthroughpreservationandenhancementofwaterareas,watercourses,vegetationandwildlifehabitats.Developmentoflandsadjacenttoscenicroutecorridorsshouldnotobstructviewsofscenicareasanddevelopmentshouldbevisuallycompatiblewiththenaturalscenicqualities.(SRE‐BeyondCorr‐1).
ProvideforNormalUsesofLandbutLimitOverheadUtilitiesandOutdoorAdvertisingStructures:Inbothdevelopedandundevelopedareas,outdooradvertisingstructures,utilityandcommunicationtowers,poles,andwiresshouldbelocatedonlywheretheywillnotdetractfromsignificantscenicviews.Allotherstructuresanduseoflandshouldbepermittedasspecifiedinthelocalzoningordinanceassupplementedbyspecialheightregulations.(SRE‐BeyondCorr‐2)
Lastly,theScenicRouteElementestablishesdevelopmentstandardsthatmayapplytotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects.
Alterationtonaturalorartificiallandcontoursshouldnotbepermittedwithoutagradingpermitissuedbythelocaljurisdictionasameansofpreservingandenhancingthenaturaltopographyandvegetationindevelopableareas.Massgradingshouldnotbepermitted.Thefollowingcriteriashouldbeappliedinthereviewofgradingpermitsindevelopableareas:
Asameansofpreservingnaturalridgeskylineswithinthecounty,nomajorridgelineshouldbealteredtotheextentthatanartificialridgelineresults.
Accessroadsshouldbelocatedanddesignedtokeepgradingtoaminimum.
Naturalgroundcontoursinslopeareasover10%shouldnotbealteredmorethan5%overall,exceptinsuchslopeareaswherelargestandsofmaturevegetation,scenicnaturalformationsornaturalwatercoursesexist,wheregradingshouldbelimitedsoastopreservethenaturalfeatures.
Anycontouralteredbygradingshouldberestoredbymeansoflandsculpturinginsuchamannerastominimizerun‐offanderosionproblems,andshouldbeplantedwithlowmaintenance,fireresistantplantmaterialsthatarecompatiblewiththeexistingenvironment.
Open Space Element
ThefollowingprinciplesfromtheOpenSpaceElementoftheGeneralPlan(OpenSpaceElement)mayapplytotheprogramandtheGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjects.
IncludeNaturalRidgelinesandSlopeAreas:Naturalridgelines,andslopesinexcessoftwenty‐fivepercentingrade,shouldbeleftasopenspacetoeliminatemassgrading.
ConsolidateandLocateUtilityLinestoAvoidScenicAreas:Whereverfeasible,powerandpipeutilitylinesshouldbeconsolidatedtopreventfurtherseveranceofopenspacelands.Utilitylinesandaqueductsinopenspaceareasshouldbelocatedsoastoavoidareasofoutstandingbeauty.
NaturalResourceswithinOpenSpaceAreasShouldbePermanentlyProtected:Withinopenspaceareas,eitherpubliclyorprivatelyowned,removalofmaturetreesshouldnotbepermittedwithoutthepermissionofthelocalauthority.Alterationofstreambedsorbodiesofwaterandadjacentvegetationshouldbepermittedonlyasameansoferosion‐controlorfloodcontrol,aspermittedbytheadoptedplansofregionalorlocaljurisdictions,andinsuchamannerastoenhancewatercourses,scenicshorelines,andwetlandswithinthecounty.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐6
October 2014ICF 00323.08
East County Area Plan
TheprogramareafallswithinAlamedaCountyECAP.ThefollowinggoalsandpoliciesoftheECAPmaybeapplicabletotheproposedprogramandprojects.GoalsintheECAPareintendedtobegeneralstatementsofaconditionAlamedaCountywantstoachieve,andtheassociatedpoliciesarethefocusedstatementsofhowtheCountywillachievethesegoals(AlamedaCounty2000).
Sensitive Viewsheds
Goal:Topreserveuniquevisualresourcesandprotectsensitiveviewsheds.
Policy105:TheCountyshallpreservethefollowingmajorvisually‐sensitiveridgelineslargelyinopenspaceuse:
1. TheridgelinesofPleasanton,Main,andSunolRidgeswestofPleasanton;
2. TheridgelinesofSchafer,Shell,Skyline,OakandDivideRidgeswestofDublinandtheridgelinesaboveDoolanCanyoneastofDublin;
3. TheridgelinesaboveCollierCanyonandVascoRoadandtheridgelinessurroundingBrushyPeaknorthofLivermore;
4. TheridgelinesabovethevineyardssouthofLivermore;
5. TheridgelinesaboveHappyValleysouthofPleasanton.
Policy106:Structuresmaynotbelocatedonridgelinesorhilltopsorwheretheywillprojectabovearidgelineorhilltopasviewedfrompublicroads,trails,parksandotherpublicviewpointsunlessthereisnoothersiteontheparcelforthestructureoronacontiguousparcelincommon ownershiponorsubsequenttothedatethisordinancebecomeseffective.Newparcelsmaynotbecreatedthathavenobuildingsiteotherthanaridgelineorhilltop,orthatwouldcauseastructuretoprotrudeabovearidgelineorhilltop,unlessthereisnootherpossibleconfiguration.
Policy107:TheCountyshallpermitnostructure(e.g.,housingunit,barn,orotherbuildingwithfourwalls)thatprojectsaboveavisually‐sensitivemajorridgeline.
Policy108:Totheextentpossible,includingbyclusteringifnecessary,structuresshallbelocatedonthatpartofaparceloroncontiguousparcelsincommonownershiponorsubsequenttothedatethisordinancebecomeseffective,wherethedevelopmentisleastvisibletopersonsonpublicroads,trails,parksandotherpublicviewpoints.Thispolicydoesnotapplytoagriculturalstructurestotheextentitisnecessaryforagriculturalpurposesthattheybelocatedinmorevisibleareas.
Policy113:TheCountyshallreviewdevelopmentproposedadjacenttoornearpublicparklandstoensurethatviewsfromparksandtrailsaremaintained.
Policy114:TheCountyshallrequiretheuseoflandscapinginbothruralandurbanareastoenhancethescenicqualityoftheareaandtoscreenundesirableviews.Choiceofplantsshouldbebasedoncompatibilitywithsurroundingvegetation,drought‐tolerance,andsuitabilitytositeconditions;andinruralareas,habitatvalueandfireretardance.
Policy115:Inallcasesappropriatebuildingmaterials,landscapingandscreeningshallberequiredtominimizethevisualimpactofdevelopment.Developmentshallblendwithandbesubordinatetotheenvironmentandcharacteroftheareawherelocated,soastobeasunobtrusiveaspossibleandnotdetractfromthenatural,openspaceorvisualqualitiesofthearea.Tothemaximumextentpracticable,allexteriorlightingmustbelocated,designedandshieldedsoastoconfinedirectraystotheparcelwherethelightingislocated.
Policy116:Tothemaximumextentpossible,developmentshallbelocatedanddesignedtoconformwithratherthanchangenaturallandforms.Thealterationofnaturaltopography,
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐7
October 2014ICF 00323.08
vegetation,andothercharacteristicsbygrading,excavating,fillingorotherdevelopmentactivityshallbeminimized.Totheextentfeasible,accessroadsshallbeconsolidatedandlocatedwheretheyareleastvisiblefrompublicviewpoints.
Policy117:TheCountyshallrequirethatwheregradingisnecessary,theoff‐sitevisibilityofcutandfillslopesanddrainageimprovementsisminimized.Gradedslopesshallbedesignedtosimulatenaturalcontoursandsupportvegetationtoblendwithsurroundingundisturbedslopes.
Policy118:TheCountyshallrequirethatgradingavoidareascontaininglargestandsofmature,healthyvegetation,scenicnaturalformations,ornaturalwatercourses.
Policy119:TheCountyshallrequirethataccessroadsbesitedanddesignedtominimizegrading.
Policy120:TheCountyshallrequirethatutilitylinesbeplacedundergroundwheneverfeasible.Whenlocatedaboveground,utilitylinesandsupportingstructuresshallbesitedtominimizetheirvisualimpact.
Windfarms
Goal:Tomaximizetheproductionofwindgeneratedenergy.
Policy169:TheCountyshallallowforcontinuedoperation,newdevelopment,redevelopment,andexpansionofexistingandplannedwindfarmfacilitieswithinthelimitsofenvironmentalconstraints.
Policy170:TheCountyshallprotectnearbyexistingusesfrompotentialtraffic,noise,dust,visual,andotherimpactsgeneratedbytheconstructionandoperationofwindfarmfacilities.
Streets and Highways
Goal:TocompleteCounty‐plannedstreetandhighwayimprovementswhichareattractivelydesignedtointegratepedestrianandvehicleuse.
Policy198:TheCountyshallallowreductionsinroadwayswidthsinareasofcomplextopography,sensitiveresources,orscenicvalue.
Scenic Highways
Goal:Topreserveandenhanceviewswithinsceniccorridors.
Policy215:TheCountyshallmanagedevelopmentandconservationoflandwithinEastCountyscenic highway corridors tomaintainandenhancescenicvalues.
Contra Costa County—Conditions of Approval
Windturbinestructuresshallbeofneutralnon‐reflectivecolors.ColorsshallbesubjecttoreviewandapprovalbytheZoningAdministrator.Thisincludesthebladesofthewindturbines.AlthoughtheprogramareaiscompletelywithinAlamedaCounty,itsnorthernboundarybordersContraCostaCounty.ContraCostaCountyconditionsofapprovalandordinancesrelatedtowindenergyconversionsystemsmaybeapplicabletothecumulativeanalysisbecausetheVascoWindsRepoweringProjectisnearthesouthernboundaryofContraCostaCounty.
Contra Costa County Code of Ordinances—Chapter 88‐3: Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS)
88‐3.618SiteAesthetics.(a)WECS(towersandblades)structuresandfencingshallbeofanon‐reflective,unobtrusivecolor.(b)AllWECS,buildings,andstructuresshallbesitedtominimizevisualimpacttoresidenceswithinonemile,adjacentroadways,andCountyscenicroutes.ThismayrequirerelocationofoneormoreproposedWECS.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐8
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Environmental Setting
Regional Character
TheprogramareaisinanunincorporatedruralpartofAlamedaCounty,inthenortheasterncornerofthecountyadjacenttothewesternboundaryofSanJoaquinCountyandthesouthernboundaryofContraCostaCounty.
Thearea’stopographyischaracterizedbygrass‐covered,roundedhillsandsmoothcontours,withoccasionalsteepslopesandridges.Abroad,flatexpanseoftheSanJoaquinValleyliestothenortheastandeast,andtheDeltaliesnortheastofthesite.TheSanJoaquinValleyisdominatedbyagriculturallands.Theremainderofthesurroundingareaischaracterizedbygrass‐covered,roundedhillsandsmoothcontours,withoccasionalsteepslopesandridges,andmuchofthislandservesascattlegrazingland.
TheLosVaqueroswatershedliesnorthwestoftheprogramarea.ThecityofLivermorelieswestoftheprogramarea.Tothenorthandeastoftheprogramarea,respectively,arethecityofTracyandthecommunityofByron.Theareasouthoftheprogramareaislargelyundeveloped.
Ingeneral,theprogramareaismostlyundeveloped.However,agricultural,industrial,andruralresidentiallandusesarescatteredthroughouttheregion.Windturbinesandassociatedinfrastructure,suchassubstations,areadominantandestablishedindustrialvisualfeaturethroughoutmostoftheregion(Figures2‐3and3.1‐1).
Vicinity Character
Theprojectvicinityisdefinedastheareawithin0.5mileoftheprogramareaandiscomprisedoftheprogram,GoldenHillsProject,andPattersonPassProject.
Program Area
TheprogramareaisinthenortheasterncornerofAlamedaCountynexttoitsboundarieswithContraCostaCountytothenorthandSanJoaquinCountytotheeast(Figure1‐2).
Similartothegreaterregion,theprogramareaismostlycharacterizedbygrass‐covered,rollinghills,withroadcutstoaccommodateruralroadsandI‐580.Stringsofturbines,powerlines,transformers,accessroads,andsubstationsarethemostvisuallydistinctartificialfeaturesthroughoutmosttheprogramarea.Whileportionsoftheprogramareaarenotdevelopedwithturbines,asnotedintheProjectDescription,asofOctober2011,therewereapproximately3,490windturbinesof11differenttypesintheAPWRAacrossbothAlamedaandContraCostaCounties(AppendixA).TheseincludetheturbinesassociatedwiththeGoldenHillsandPattersonPassProjectsites.Theprogramareaisdottedwithindustrialsites,residences,andstockponds,includingafewclustersofsmallerruralresidentialpropertiesonDyerRoad,MidwayRoad,andMountainHouseRoad.
TheprogramareanorthofI‐580isprimarilycomposedofrollingterrainthattransitionstoflatteragriculturallandsjustoutsideofthenortheasternprogramareaboundary.TheCaliforniaAqueduct,CaliforniaAqueductBikeway,BethanyReservoirStateRecreationArea(BethanyReservoir),AltamontandVascoRoadLandfills,SummitSchool,MountainHouseBar,MountainHouseSchool,andaseriesofmulti‐useregionaltrailsconnectingBrushyPeakRegionalPreservetoDelValleRegionalPark,SanJoaquinCountybordertoShadowCliffsRegionalRecreationArea,BrushyPeak
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐9
October 2014ICF 00323.08
RegionalPreservetoBethanyReservoir,andVascoCavesRegionalPreservetoBrushyPeakRegionalPreserveareinthenorthernprogramarea(Figure3.1‐2)(EastBayRegionalParkDistrict2007).Therearealsoacoupleofindustrialsitesandrailroadtracksinthisareaaswell.
TheprogramareasouthofI‐580ismoresparselypopulatedandhasfewerindustrialusesthanthenorthernprogramarea.Theterraintransitionsfromrolling,grassyhillstomorerugged,steeperreliefwithmoretreestothesouth.ThepotentialfutureTeslaRegionalPreserveandCarnegieStateVehicularRecreationAreaareinthesouthernprogramarea(Figure3.1‐2).TheMidwaySubstationisanothervisuallyprominentfeatureinthissectionoftheprogramarea(Figure2‐10).
TherollingterrainandpresenceofturbinescreatesauniquevisualexperienceforviewersonscenicroutesshowninFigure3.1‐2andfromnon‐designatedroadwaysintheprogramarea.Viewsvary,seasonally,whenthegrassesonthehillsideschangefromgreentobrown.
Golden Hills Project
ThevisualcharacteroftheGoldenHillsprojectareaissimilartothatoftheprogramarea.ThecharacteroftheGoldenHillsprojectarea(Figure3.1‐2)isdiscussedfromnorthtosouth.
Thenorthernmostportionoftheprojectarea,justsouthofI‐580,ischaracterizedbyrolling,grassyterrainwithturbines,transmissionlines,andaccessroads.Inadditiontotheturbines,thisareaisdottedwithindustrialfacilities,residences,andstockponds.TheareaisalsocharacterizedbysteepcutsinthehillsthroughouttoaccommodateJessRanchRoad,FlynnRoad,andtherailroadtracks.TheSanJoaquinCountytoShadowCliffsRegionalRecreationArearegionaltrailfollowsaportionofthenorthernprojectareaboundary(EastBayRegionalParkDistrict2007).Therearefourscenicroutesintheprojectareavicinity:I‐580isbothastate‐andCounty‐designatedscenicroute,andAltamontPassRoad,FlynnRoad,andPattersonPassRoadareCounty‐designatedscenicroutes(Figure3.1‐2)(AlamedaCounty1966).GrantLineRoadismorethanamilenortheastoftheclosestprojectboundary,whileMountainHouseRoadismorethan2milesnortheastoftheclosestprojectboundary,andneitherhaveviewsoftheprojectareaduetointerveningtopography.Inaddition,theproposedRoute239freeway(aproposedAlamedaCounty‐designatedscenicroute)wouldbeleast2milesnortheastoftheclosestprojectboundary(TriLink2014).TheproposedRoute239freewayisnotshownonFigure3.1‐2becausethefinalroutehasnotbeenchosen.However,itisanticipatedthatthisroute,whichwouldbenearGrantLineandMountainHouseRoads,wouldsimilarlynothaveviewsoftheprojectareaduetointerveningtopography.
FlynnRoadcrossesthesouthernmostportionoftheprojectareafromwesttoeastwherenoturbinesarecurrentlypresent.Viewsconsistmostlyofrollinggrass‐coveredhills.However,stringsofturbinesinthevicinityofthisundevelopedareaarestillthemostprominentartificialfeaturesinviewsfromthissectionofroad.PattersonPassRoad,anAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroute,runsgenerallysouthoftheprojectarea,skirtingitseasterntip(Figure3.1‐2)(AlamedaCounty1966).ViewsoftheprojectareaareavailablefromLivermore,I‐580,FlynnRoad,JessRanchRoad,easternPattersonPassRoadbetweenitsintersectionwiththerailroadtracksandtheSanJoaquinCountyline,andvariousresidential(Figure1‐2)andindustrialuses.HillsblockviewsoftheprojectareafromAltamontPassRoad.Becausetheexistingturbinesarelocatedonhill‐andridgetops,theyarevisiblefromtheselanduses.RefertoFigure3.1‐1forarepresentativeviewfromI‐580.
TheGoldenHillsprojectareadisplaysamoderatelevelofvividness,intactness,andunity.Therollinghillsarevisuallypleasingincontrasttotheflatvalleyfloor.Theturbinesmaybeperceivedasaddingtothevisualuniquenessofviewsbecauseoftheformandmotionassociatedwiththe
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐10
October 2014ICF 00323.08
turbines.However,theycanalsobeperceivedasanegativevisualfeatureduetothescaleandnumberofturbinesthatpopulatetherollinghillsidesandcanbeseenasjuttingoutofthetopsofthesmooth,grass‐covered,rollinghills,detractingfrom,encroachingon,andbreakingupviewsofthesenaturalfeatures.Utilitylinesandpylontowersintheprogramareamayacttodetractfromtheintactnessandunity,butvaryinprominencefromplacetoplace.Therefore,theoverallvisualqualityoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaismoderate.
Patterson Pass Project
Liketheprogramarea,thePattersonPassProjectvicinityischaracterizedbygrassy,rollinghillswithstringsofturbines,transmissionlines,substations,andaccessroads.Therearecurrently317operationalturbinesonthePattersonPassProjectsite.Inadditiontotheturbines,therearetwoindustrialsites,astream,andfourstockpondsinthePattersonPassProjectvicinity.
Therearenostate‐designatedscenichighwaysinthePattersonPassProjectvicinity.PattersonPassRoad,alongthesouthernborderofthesite,isanAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroute(Figure3.1‐2)(AlamedaCounty1966).
ViewsofthisprojectsiteareavailablefromPattersonPassRoadlookingnorthandfromJessRanchRoadlookingsouth.Therearealsoacoupleofresidencesneartheprojectarea;however,theclosestisatleast2,200feetfromthenearestproposedturbinelocation.Thedominantfeaturesvisiblefromtheseroadsaretheexistingturbinestringscoveringtheprojectarea.
LiketheGoldenHillsprojectarea,thePattersonPassprojectareadisplaysamoderatelevelofvividness,intactness,andunity.Therollinghillsarevisuallypleasingincontrasttotheflatvalleyfloor.Theturbinesmaybeperceivedasaddingtothevisualuniquenessofviewsbecauseoftheformandmotionassociatedwiththeturbines.However,theycanalsobeperceivedasanegativevisualfeatureduetothescaleandnumberofturbinesthatpopulatetherollinghillsidesandcanbeseenasjuttingoutofthetopsofthesmooth,grass‐covered,rollinghillsthatdetractfrom,encroachon,andbreakupviewsofthesenaturalfeatures.Utilitylinesandpylontowersintheprogramareamaydetractfromtheintactnessandunity,buttovaryingdegrees,dependingonlocation.Therefore,theoverallvisualqualityofthePattersonPassProjectismoderate.
Existing Viewer Groups and Viewer Responses
Thefollowingdiscussionofexistingviewergroupsandviewerresponsesisapplicabletotheprogram,GoldenHillsProject,andPattersonPassProject.
Residents
Residencesarescatteredthroughouttheprogramarea.Theseresidencestendtobemostlysingle‐family,ruralhomesonlargelandparcels.Theviewsofmostresidentsintheprogramareaconsistofsmooth,grass‐covered,rollinghillsandturbinestringscharacteristicoftheprogramarea.Residentswouldbeexpectedtohavethehighestsensitivitytovisualchangesintheprojectareasbecauseoftheirfamiliaritywiththeview,theirinvestmentinthearea,andtheirsenseofownershipoftheview.Residentswhooccupyparcelsleasedforwindgenerationfacilitieswouldbeexpectedtohavethelowestlevelofsensitivitytochangebecausetheselandownershaveagreedtoleasethesiteforwindenergygenerationpurposesandwouldthereforebemoreacceptingofrelatedvisualchanges.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐11
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Businesses
Thereareafewbusinesses/industrialusesscatteredthroughouttheprogramarea.However,almostallbusinessandindustrialusesarelocatednorthofI‐580.Businessesintheprogramareaaremostlyagriculture‐related.Thereisanoff‐roadspecialtystoreandtheAltamontLandfilloffofAltamontPassRoad,theVascoRoadLandfilloffofVascoRoad,theMountainHouseBaroffofGrantLineRoad,andaconstructioncompanyoffofDyerRoad.Almostallbusinessesintheprogramareahaveturbinesintheirviewshed,andtheirviewsconsistofsmooth,grass‐covered,rollinghillsandturbinestringscharacteristicoftheprogramarea.Employeesatnearbybusinesseswouldbeengagedinwork‐relatedactivitiesandwouldbeexpectedtobelesssensitivetovisualchangesthannearbyresidents.Therefore,businessesareconsideredtohavelowvisualsensitivity.
Roadway Users
Motoristsuseroadwaysintheprogramandprojectareasandmayusetheroadwaysforcommutingandhaulingorformorerecreationaluses,suchassightseeingonscenicroadways.Roadwaystraversingtheprojectrangefromhigh‐speedinterstatetolower‐speed,two‐lanelocalroadwaysthatwindthroughtherollinglandscape.Motorists’viewsrangefromsmooth,grass‐covered,rollinghillsdominatedwithturbinestringstosteepridgesandravineswithnoartificialstructures.Whilemorenumerousthanresidents,motoristswouldgenerallybelesssensitivetovisualchangesintheprogramareabecauseoftheshorterdurationoftheirexposuretotheviewsandthefocusoftheirattentionondrivingactivities.Therefore,motoristsareconsideredtohavemoderatevisualsensitivity.
Recreationists
Recreationistsincludecyclistsonregionaltrailsandlocalroadwaysandusersofrecreationalandpreserveareas.Viewersusingrecreationtrails,recreationareas,andregionalpreservesareconsideredtohavehighvisualsensitivitybecauserecreationiststendtohighlyvalueviewsindesignatedrecreationareasandcouldbeexposedtotheseviewsforextendedperiods(e.g.,hikingalongregionaltrailsorspendingthedayatBethanyReservoir).
3.1.3 Environmental Impacts
Methods for Analysis
Usingtheconceptsandterminologydescribedatthebeginningofthissection,andcriteriafordeterminingsignificancedescribedbelow,analysisofthevisualeffectsoftheprojectarebasedonthefollowing.
DirectfieldobservationonJune5,2013fromvantagepoints,includingneighboringpropertiesandroadways.
Photographicdocumentationofkeyviewsofandfromtheprojectsites.
Evaluationoftheregionalvisualcontext.
Visualsimulations.
Reviewoftheprojectinregardtocompliancewithstateandlocalordinancesandregulationsandlocalgeneralplanpolicies.
Professionalstandardspertainingtovisualquality.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐12
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Determination of Significance
InaccordancewithAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theprogramAlternative1,programAlternative2,theGoldenHillsproject,orthePattersonPassprojectwouldbeconsideredtohaveasignificanteffectifitwouldresultinanyoftheconditionslistedbelow.
Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonascenicvista.
Substantiallydamagescenicresources,includingbutnotlimitedtotrees,rockoutcroppings,andhistoricbuildingsalongascenichighway.
Substantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthesiteanditssurroundings.
Createanewsourceofsubstantiallightorglarethatwouldadverselyaffectdaytimeornighttimeviewsinthearea.
Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Thissectiondescribesthepotentialimpactsrelatedtoaestheticsthatcouldresultfromimplementationoftheproposedprogramandprojects.Theanalysisbeginswithrelativelyshort‐termeffectsanticipatedduringconstructionandproceedstoconsiderationofthelongertermvisualimpacts.
ImpactAES‐1a‐1:Temporaryvisualimpactscausedbyconstructionactivities—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionassociatedwithAlternative1wouldcreatetemporarychangesinviewsofandfromtheprogramarea.Constructionisexpectedtolast8–12months,andconstructionactivitieswouldcreateviewsofheavyequipmentandassociatedvehicles(seeSection2.6.3,RepoweringActivities),intotheviewshedofresidents,businesses,recreationareas,state‐designatedscenichighways(I‐580),andAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroutes.Constructionwouldalsorequirecranepads,laydownareasforoffloadingturbinecomponents,andthreetoeightconcretebatchplants.RefertotheVicinityCharacterdiscussionaboveforadetaileddescriptionoftheselandusesintheprogramarea.
Motoristsalongstate‐designatedscenichighwaysandCounty‐designatedscenicroutes,nearbyresidences,recreationistsusingtherecreationareasandtrails,andemployeesofnearbybusinesseswouldbetheprincipalviewergroups.Whilemotoristsintheareawouldbemoderatelysensitivetochangesinviews,theyhaveintermittentandshort‐termvisualaccesstotheprogramareaastheyarepassingby,sotheywouldnotbenegativelyaffectedbytemporaryconstructionactivities.Residentsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewersandcouldbeadverselyaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesbecausetheywouldhaveprolongedviewsofconstructionactivitiesandarenotaccustomedtoconstructionactivitiesinthearea.RecreationistsarealsoconsideredhighlysensitivetoviewsofconstructionactivitybecausetheycouldhaveprolongedviewswhenusingregionaltrailsorspendingthedayatBethanyReservoir,theyvaluetheviewsfromtheserecreationareas,andtheywouldnotbeaccustomedtoconstructionactivitiesinthearea.Employeesofbusinesseswouldnotbegreatlyaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesbecausetheywouldbemostlyfocusedontheirworkratherthanconstructionactivities.
Inaddition,high‐voltagelightingusedfornighttimeconstructionwouldnegativelyaffectnighttimeviewsofandfromtheworkareaandcouldbeanuisancetonearbyresidents,whoareconsideredtohavehighvisualsensitivity.Constructionisassumedtooperateforapproximately10hoursperday.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐13
October 2014ICF 00323.08
AlamedaCountyNoiseOrdinance,Section6.60.070,limitsnoisesourcesassociatedwithconstructiontooccurbetween7a.m.and7p.m.MondaythroughFridayandbetween8a.m.and5p.m.onSaturdayandSunday.Thiswouldensurethatmostconstructionwouldnotoccurpastthesehours.Duringsummer,theordinancewillensurethatnighttimelightingisnotneededbecausethesunwillrisearound6a.m.andsetaround8:30p.m.However,duringwinter,thesunwillrisearound7a.m.andsetaround5p.m.(SunriseSunset2013).Consequently,ifconstructionoccursaftersunset,whichvariesbyseason,high‐poweredlightingwouldberequiredforconstructionoperations.Thepresenceofthislightingduringconstructionwouldadverselyaffectnearbyresidentsifhigh‐poweredlightingspillsinsidetheirhomesoryards;roadwaytravelerspassingbyconstructionworkareasnearroadwaysintheprogramareaduringdawnandduskwouldhavesimilarexperiences.High‐poweredlightingcouldalsoadverselyaffectsviewsofsunsetsandnighttimeconstellationsforviewersintheprogramareaduringtheconstructionmonths.
Constructionimpactswouldbetemporaryandshort‐term,anddecommissioningandconstructionactivitieswouldoccurinamannerconsistentwithAlamedaCountyrequirementsforworkdaysandhours.However,thehighlysensitiveviewersintheprogramarea(residentsandrecreationists)couldperceivetheseimpactsassignificant.Therefore,constructionimpactswouldbepotentiallysignificantonatemporarybasis.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐1:Limitconstructiontodaylighthours
Majorconstructionactivitieswillnotbeundertakenbetweensunsetandsunriseoronweekends.Constructionactivityisspecificallyprohibitedfromusinghigh‐wattagelightingsourcestoilluminateworksitesaftersunsetandbeforesunrise,withtheexceptionofnighttimedeliveriesundertheapprovedtransportationcontrolplanorotherconstructionactivitiesthatrequirenighttimeworkforsafetyconsiderations.
ImpactAES‐1a‐2:Temporaryvisualimpactscausedbyconstructionactivities—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ImpactsassociatedwithAlternative2wouldbesimilartothoseofAlternative1.UnderAlternative2,21moreturbinescouldbeinstalled,resultinginaslightlygreateramountofconstructionactivity.However,constructionoftheadditionalturbineswouldoccurincloseproximitytotheturbinesproposedunderAlternative1andwouldnotresultinperceivabledifferencesinconstructionbetweenthetwoalternatives.
ConstructionassociatedwithAlternative2wouldcreatetemporarychangesinviewsofandfromtheprogramarea.Constructionisexpectedtolast8–12months,andconstructionactivitieswouldcreateviewsofheavyequipmentandassociatedvehicles(seeSection2.6.3,RepoweringActivities),intotheviewshedofresidents,businesses,recreationareas,state‐designatedscenichighways(I‐580),andAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroutes.RefertotheVicinityCharacterdiscussionaboveforadetaileddescriptionoftheselandusesintheprogramarea.Inaddition,high‐voltagelightingusedfornighttimeconstructionwouldnegativelyaffectnighttimeviewsofandfromtheworkareaandcouldbeanuisancetonearbyresidents,whoareconsideredtohavehighvisualsensitivity.Constructionisassumedtooperateforapproximately10hoursperday.AlamedaCountyNoiseOrdinance,Section6.60.070,limitsnoisesourcesassociatedwithconstructiontooccurbetween7a.m.and7p.m.MondaythroughFridayandbetween8a.m.and5p.m.onSaturdayandSunday.Thiswouldensurethatmostconstructionwouldnotoccurpastthesehours.During
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐14
October 2014ICF 00323.08
summer,theordinancewillensurethatnighttimelightingisnotneededbecausethesunwillrisearound6a.m.andsetaround8:30p.m.However,duringwinter,thesunwillrisearound7a.m.andsetaround5p.m.(SunriseSunset2013).Consequently,ifconstructionoccursaftersunset,whichvariesbyseason,high‐poweredlightingwouldberequiredforconstructionoperations.Thepresenceofthislightingduringconstructionwouldadverselyaffectnearbyresidentsifhigh‐poweredlightingspillsinsidetheirhomesoryards;roadwaytravelerspassingbyconstructionworkareasnearroadwaysintheprogramareaduringdawnandduskwouldhavesimilarexperiences.High‐poweredlightingcouldalsoadverselyaffectsviewsofsunsetsandnighttimeconstellationsforviewersintheprogramareaduringtheconstructionmonths.
MotoristsalongStatescenichighwaysandCounty‐designatedscenicroutes,nearbyresidences,recreationistsusingtherecreationareasandtrails,andemployeesofnearbybusinesseswouldbetheprincipalviewergroups.Whilemotoristsintheareawouldbemoderatelysensitivetochangesinviews,theyhaveintermittentandshort‐termvisualaccesstotheprogramareaastheyarepassingby,sotheywouldnotbenegativelyaffectedbytemporaryconstructionactivities.Residentsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewersandcouldbeadverselyaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesbecausetheywouldhaveprolongedviewsofconstructionactivitiesandarenotaccustomedtoconstructionactivitiesinthearea.RecreationistsarealsoconsideredhighlysensitivetoviewsofconstructionactivitybecausetheycouldhaveprolongedviewswhenusingregionaltrailsorspendingthedayattheBethanyReservoir,andtheyvaluetheviewsfromtheserecreationareasandwouldnotbeaccustomedtoconstructionactivitiesinthearea.Employeesofbusinesseswouldnotbegreatlyaffectedbyconstructionactivitiesbecausetheywouldbemostlyfocusedontheirwork,ratherthanconstructionactivities.
Constructionimpactswouldbetemporaryandshort‐term,anddecommissioningandconstructionactivitieswouldoccurinamannerconsistentwithAlamedaCountyrequirementsforworkdaysandhours.However,thehighlysensitiveviewersintheprogramarea(residentsandrecreationists)couldperceivetheseimpactsassignificant.
Therefore,constructionimpactswouldbepotentiallysignificantonatemporarybasis.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐1:Limitconstructiontodaylighthours
ImpactAES‐1b:Temporaryvisualimpactscausedbyconstructionactivities—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionoftheGoldenHillsProjectisexpectedtolastapproximately9months.Refertothediscussionoftheprogramalternatives(ImpactsAES‐1a‐1andAES‐1a‐2)forageneraldescriptionofvisualimpactsofconstructionactivities.TemporaryconstructionimpactsfortheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbesimilar,andhighlysensitiveviewersintheGoldenHillsProjectarea(residentsandrecreationists)couldbeadverselyaffectedbyconstructionactivities.Thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐1:Limitconstructiontodaylighthours
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐15
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactAES‐1c:Temporaryvisualimpactscausedbyconstructionactivities—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ConstructionofthePattersonPassProjectisexpectedtolastapproximately6–9months.Refertothediscussionfortheprogramalternatives(ImpactsAES‐1a‐1andAES‐1a‐2)forageneraldescriptionofvisualimpactsofconstructionactivities.TemporaryconstructionimpactsforthePattersonPassProjectwouldbesimilar,andhighlysensitiveviewersinthePattersonPassProjectarea(residentsandrecreationists)couldbeadverselyaffectedbyconstructionactivities.Thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐1wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐1:Limitconstructiontodaylighthours
ImpactAES‐2a‐1:Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonascenicvista—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
AsdiscussedintheRegulatorySetting,Policy105oftheECAPliststheridgelinesaboveVascoRoadandtheridgelinessurroundingBrushyPeaknorthofLivermoreassensitiveviewsheds.Policy105alsostatesthattheCountyshallpreservethesevisuallysensitiveridgelineslargelyinopenspaceuse.SincetheprojectareasurroundsBrushyPeak,andVascoRoadpassesthroughthenorthwesternboundaryoftheprojectarea(Figure3.1‐2),thereispotentialforturbinestobeinstalledintheseareas.However,underPolicy105theCountywouldbeobligatedtodisallownewturbinestructuresfrombeinglocatedintheseareas(seeRegulatorySettingsection).TheinstallationofnewturbinesinsuchareaswouldconflictwithPolicy105andwouldconstituteasignificantimpactonscenicroutesidentifiedintheScenicRouteElement.
Anumberofscenicvistasareavailablefromlocalroadways,outandovertheprogramarea.Inaddition,scenicvistasexistfromlocalrecreationaltrailsandresidencesandbusinessesonhillsidesintheprogramarea.Theseareasconsistofwideopenviewsoftherolling,grass‐covered,rurallandscapedottedwithexistingturbines.Thehubheightoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesrangesfrom18to55meters(approximately59to180feet)andthird‐generationrangefrom41to68meters(approximately134to223feet).Theproposedfourth‐generationtowersinstalledunderAlternative1wouldbe80–96meters(262–315feet)tall.Therefore,theproposedfourth‐generationtowerswouldbe28–62meters(92–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbines.Viewsoftheproposedturbinesmaybemoreorlessprevalentdependingonaviewer’slocationwithinthelandscapeandiftheviewerhasmoredirectviewsoftheturbinesorviewsthatarepartiallyorfullyscreenedbytopography.
Althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration.Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7showexistingviewsoftheprogramareaandsimulatedviewswithbuildoutoftheprogramunderbothalternatives.Theimagesarepresentedfromnorthtosouth;Figures3.1‐6and3.1‐7areexamplesofascenicvistaintheprogramarea.Thenew,less‐clutteredconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐16
October 2014ICF 00323.08
Placementofnewturbinesonundevelopedportionsoftheprogramareawouldintroducelargestructureswherenonepresentlyexist,alteringtheundevelopedcharacteroftheseparcels.
TherearealsoscenicvistasfromTeslaRoad,whichisanAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroutenearthesouthernboundaryoftheprogramareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist.Theseviewsconsistofgrass‐covered,rollinghillsdottedwithoaktrees;steeperridges;andcrevassesandaremostlyfreefromencroachmentofartificialfeatures,exceptfortheoccasionalresidence.Installingturbinesinthesescenicvistaareaswouldconstituteasignificantimpactonviewsfromlocalroadways(includingTeslaRoad),recreationaltrails,andresidencesandbusinesseslocatedonhillsides.Policies170and215oftheEastCountyAreaPlanrequiretheCounty,respectively,toprotectnearbyexistingusesfromthevisualimpacts(amongothereffects)ofwindfarms’constructionandoperation,andtomaintainandenhancescenicvaluesintheseareasthroughreviewofdevelopmentanduseofconservationpolicies(seeRegulatorySetting).Becauseitisanareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,theconflictwithPolicies170and215andthevisualimpactitselfwouldbesignificant.Forthoseareaswithexistingolderturbines,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheEastCountyAreaPlan,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.
Therefore,thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2athroughAES‐2cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
Newturbinesalongridgelinesorhilltopsthathavenotpreviouslybeendevelopedwithcommercial‐scalewindturbineswillnotbeallowed,unlessaseparateSiteDevelopmentReviewiscompletedthatdeterminesthatthevisualeffectswillbesubstantiallyavoidedbydistancefrompublicviewpoints(e.g.,morethan2,000feet),interveningterrain,screeninglandscaping,orcompensatoryimprovementstoequivalentandnearby(radiusof1mile)scenicfeatures,asapprovedbythePlanningDirector.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
Projectsiteswillbecleanedofallderelictequipment,windturbinecomponentsnotrequiredfortheproject,andlitteranddebrisfromoldturbinesandpastturbineoperations.Suchlitteranddebrismayincludederelictturbines,obsoleteanemometers,unusedelectricalpoles,andbrokenturbineblades.Inaddition,abandonedroadsthatarenolongerinuseonsuchparcelswillberestoredandhydroseededtoreclaimthesitesandremovetheirvisualtracesfromtheviewscape,exceptincaseswheretheresourceagencies(USFWSandCDFW)recommendthatthefeaturesbeleftinplaceforresourceprotection.Allparcelswithnewturbineswillbemaintainedinsuchamannerthroughthelifeofprojectoperationsanduntiltheparcelsarereclaimedinaccordancewiththeapprovedreclamationplan.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
Surpluspartsandmaterialsthatarekeptonsitewillbemaintainedinaneatandorderlyfashionandscreenedfromview.Thiscanbeaccomplishedbyusingaweatherproofcamouflagematerialthatcanbedrapedoversurpluspartsandmaterialsstockpiles.Drapingmaterialswillbechangedouttoaccommodateforseasonalvariationssothatsurplusmaterialsarecamouflagedinaneffectivemannerwhengrassesarebothgreenandbrown.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐17
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactAES‐2a‐2:Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonascenicvista—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
AsdiscussedintheRegulatorySetting,Policy105oftheECAPliststheridgelinesaboveVascoRoadandtheridgelinessurroundingBrushyPeaknorthofLivermoreassensitiveviewsheds.Policy105alsostatesthattheCountyshallpreservethesevisually‐sensitiveridgelineslargelyinopenspaceuse.SincetheprojectareasurroundsBrushyPeak,andVascoRoadpassesthroughthenorthwesternboundaryoftheprojectarea(Figure3.1‐2),thereispotentialforturbinestobeinstalledintheseareas.However,underPolicy105theCountywouldbeobligatedtodisallownewturbinestructuresfrombeinglocatedintheseareas(seeRegulatorySettingsection).
Anumberofscenicvistasareavailablefromlocalroadways,outandovertheprogramarea.Inaddition,scenicvistasexistfromlocalrecreationaltrailsandresidentsandbusinesseslocatedonhillsideswithintheprogramarea.Theseareasconsistofwideopenviewsoftherolling,grass‐covered,rurallandscapedottedwithexistingturbines.Thehubheightoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesrangesfrom18to55meters(approximately59to180feet)andthird‐generationrangefrom41–68meters(approximately134–223feet).Theproposedfourth‐generationtowersinstalledunderAlternative1wouldbe80–96meters(262–315feet)tall.Therefore,theproposedfourth‐generationtowerswouldbe28–62meters(92–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbineslocatedonsite.Viewsoftheproposedturbinesmaybemoreorlessprevalentdependingonaviewer’slocationwithinthelandscapeandiftheviewerhasmoredirectviewsoftheturbinesorviewsthatarepartiallyorfullyscreenedbytopography.
Althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration.Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7showexistingviewsoftheprogramareaandsimulatedviewswithbuildoutoftheprogramAlternative2.Theimagesarepresentedfromnorthtosouth,andtheexistingviewshowninFigures3.1‐6and3.1‐7showexamplesofscenicvistasintheprogramarea.Twenty‐oneadditionalturbineswouldbebuiltunderAlternative2.Asseeninthesimulationforthisalternative,onlythetopsoftheturbinesandturbinebladesofthesenewturbineswouldbevisible,giventhehillyterrainthatactstoobscuretherestoftheturbinebodyfromview.TheadditionalturbinesassociatedwithAlternative2arebarelynoticeableandwouldresultinvisualchangesthatareimperceptiblecomparedwithAlternative1.LikeAlternative1,thenew,less‐clutteredconfigurationofAlternative2allowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
TherearealsoscenicvistasfromTeslaRoad,whichisanAlamedaCounty–designatedscenicroutenearthesouthernboundaryoftheprogramareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist.Theseviewsconsistofgrass‐covered,rollinghillsdottedwithoaktrees;steeperridges;andcrevassesandaremostlyfreefromencroachmentofartificialfeatures,exceptfortheoccasionalresidence.Installingturbinesinthesescenicvistaareaswouldbeasignificantimpactonviewsfromlocalroadways(includingTeslaRoad),recreationaltrails,andresidencesandbusinesseslocatedonhillsides.Policies170and215oftheECAPrequiretheCounty,respectively,toprotectnearbyexistingusesfromthevisualimpacts(amongothereffects)ofwindfarms’constructionandoperation,andtomaintainandenhancescenicvaluesintheseareasthroughreviewofdevelopmentanduseof
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐18
October 2014ICF 00323.08
conservationpolicies(seeRegulatorySettingsection).Becauseitisanareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,theconflictwithPolicies170and215andthevisualimpactitselfwouldbesignificant.Forthoseareaswithexistingolderturbines,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheEastCountyAreaPlan,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.
Therefore,thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,2b,and2cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
ImpactAES‐2b:Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonascenicvista—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificant)
TherearenodesignatedscenicvistasintheGoldenHillProjectarea.However,thereareanumberofscenicvistasavailablefromlocalroadwaysintheGoldenHillsProjectarea,suchasPattersonPassRoad(Figure3.1‐6),AltamontPassRoad(Figure3.1‐7),FlynnRoad,andI‐580,outandovertheprojectsite.Inaddition,scenicvistasexistfromlocalrecreationaltrailsand,potentially,fromnearbyresidencesandbusinesseslocatedonhillsidescouldhavevistaviewsthatincludetheGoldenHillsProjectsite.Theseareasconsistofwideopenviewsoftherolling,grass‐covered,rurallandscapedottedwithexistingturbines.Thehubheightsoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbinesintheprojectarearangefrom18to55meters(approximately59to180feet).Theproposedfourth‐generationtowersinstalledwouldbe80–96meters(262–315feet)tall.Therefore,theproposedfourth‐generationtowerswouldbe41–62meters(135–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbines.Viewsoftheproposedturbinesmaybemoreorlessprevalentdependingonaviewer’slocationwithinthelandscapeandwhethertheviewerhasmoredirectviewsoftheturbinesorviewsthatarepartiallyorfullyscreenedbytopography.
Althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Thenew,less‐clutteredconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
Becausethenewturbineswoulddetractlessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.WithrespecttoPolicies170and215oftheECAP,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerfourth‐generationturbineswithbroaderspacingwouldservethesepoliciesandhelptoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐19
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactAES‐2c:Haveasubstantialadverseeffectonascenicvista—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
TherearenodesignatedscenicvistasinthePattersonPassProjectarea.However,thereareanumberofscenicvistasavailablefromlocalroadwaysinthePattersonPassProjectarea,suchasthosefromPattersonPassRoad(Figure3.1‐6),outandovertheprojectsite.Inaddition,scenicvistasexistfromlocalrecreationaltrailsand,potentially,fromnearbyresidencesandbusinesseslocatedonhillsidescouldhavevistaviewsthatincludethePattersonPassProjectsite.Theseareasconsistofwideopenviewsoftherolling,grass‐covered,rurallandscapedottedwithexistingturbines.Thehubheightsoffirst‐andsecond‐generationturbineslocatedonthesiterangefrom18to55meters(approximately59to180feet).Theproposedfourth‐generationtowersinstalledwouldbe80–96meters(262–315feet)tall.Therefore,theproposedfourth‐generationtowerswouldbe41–62meters(135–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbineslocatedonsite.Viewsoftheproposedturbinesmaybemoreorlessprevalentdependingonaviewer’slocationwithinthelandscapeandwhethertheviewerhasmoredirectviewsoftheturbinesorviewsthatarepartiallyorfullyscreenedbytopography.
Althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Thenew,less‐clutteredconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
Becausethenewturbineswoulddetractlessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.WithrespecttoPolicies170and215oftheECAP,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerfourth‐generationturbineswithbroaderspacingwouldservethesepoliciesandhelptoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.
ImpactAES‐3a‐1:Substantiallydamagescenicresources,includingbutnotlimitedtotrees,rockoutcroppings,andhistoricbuildingsalongascenichighway—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
AsdiscussedintheVicinityCharactersection,I‐580fromtheSanJoaquinCountylinetoSR205,a0.4‐mile‐longsegment,isastate‐designatedscenichighway(CaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation2012).AsshowninFigure3.1‐2,theprogramareaincludesthissegmentofI‐580.Theclosestexistingturbinestothissegmentareapproximately0.7milesouthandarenoteasilyvisiblefromI‐580duetotopographyinsomeareasanddistance‐onlyinothers.Themostdominantartificialfeaturesarethelargetowersassociatedwithpowerlinesandthetall,stadium‐typelightingassociatedwiththeformerAltamontSpeedway.Becausethelocationofturbineshasnotyetbeendetermined,itispossiblethatwindturbinescouldbeinstalledinthisarea.Althoughmotoristsareconsideredmoderatelysensitive,itwouldbeasignificantimpacttolocateturbinesaroundthisdesignatedscenichighwaywherenoturbinescurrentlyexist.
Inadditiontostate‐designatedscenichighways,thereareseveralCounty‐designatedscenicroutesintheprogramarea.RefertotheVicinityCharacterdiscussionfortheprogramforalistofCounty‐designatedscenicroutesintheprogramarea.Currently,therearenoturbinesintheprogramarea
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐20
October 2014ICF 00323.08
aroundByron‐BethanyRoad,GrantLineRoad,TeslaRoad,andVascoRoad.TherearealsoportionsofI‐580,AltamontPassRoad,FlynnRoad,MountainHouseRoad,PattersonPassRoad,andtheproposedRoute239Freeway(Figure3.1‐2)wherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,butmotoristsontheseroadsareaccustomedtoseeingwindturbinesalongtheroute,sotheywouldnotbeadverselyaffected.Additionally,wherethereareexistingturbines,althoughthenew,moreefficientturbineswouldbe28–62meters(92–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Theproposedconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.However,itwouldbeasignificantimpacttolocateturbinesaroundByron‐BethanyRoad,GrantLineRoad,TeslaRoad,andVascoRoadwherenoturbinescurrentlyexisteventhoughmotoristsareconsideredmoderatelybutnothighlysensitive.
Forsuchareaswherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,suchasthewesternportionofFlynnRoad,theeffectonthescenicresourcesandthevisualimpactitselfwouldbesignificant.Forthoseareaswithexistingolderturbines,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheEastCountyAreaPlan,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.Therefore,thisimpactispotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
InordertocomplywithPolicy170ofAlamedaCounty’sEastCountyAreaPlan,andtopreventsignificantimpactsonvisualcharacter,noturbineswillbelocatedontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad(Figure3.1‐2).
ImpactAES‐3a‐2:Substantiallydamagescenicresources,includingbutnotlimitedtotrees,rockoutcroppings,andhistoricbuildingsalongascenichighway—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
AsdiscussedintheVicinityCharactersection,I‐580fromtheSanJoaquinCountylinetoSR205,a0.4‐mile‐longsegment,isastate‐designatedscenichighway(CaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation2012).AsshowninFigure3.1‐2,theprogramareaincludesthissegmentofI‐580.Theclosestexistingturbinestothissegmentareapproximately0.7milesouthandarenoteasilyvisiblefromI‐580duetotopographyinsomeareasanddistance‐onlyinothers.Themostdominantartificialfeaturesarethelargetowersassociatedwithpowerlinesandthetall,stadium‐typelightingassociatedwiththeformerAltamontSpeedway.Becausethelocationofturbineshasnotyetbeendetermined,itispossiblethatwindturbinescouldbeinstalledinthisarea.Althoughmotoristsare
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐21
October 2014ICF 00323.08
consideredmoderatelysensitive,itwouldbeasignificantimpacttolocateturbinesaroundthisdesignatedscenichighwaywherenoturbinescurrentlyexist.
Inadditiontostate‐designatedscenichighways,thereareseveralCounty‐designatedscenicroutesintheprogramarea.RefertotheVicinityCharacterdiscussionfortheprogramforalistofCounty‐designatedscenicroutesintheprogramarea.Currently,therearenoturbinesintheprogramareaaroundByron‐BethanyRoad,GrantLineRoad,TeslaRoad,andVascoRoad.TherearealsoportionsofI‐580,AltamontPassRoad,FlynnRoad,MountainHouseRoad,PattersonPassRoad,andtheproposedRoute239Freeway(Figure3.1‐2)wherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,butmotoristsontheseroadsareaccustomedtoseeingwindturbinesalongtheroute,sotheywouldnotbeadverselyaffected.Additionally,wherethereareexistingturbines,althoughthenew,moreefficientturbineswouldbe28–62meters(92–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbines,thenewspacedoutconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Asseeninthesimulationsforthisalternative,onlythetopsoftheturbinesandturbinebladesofthesenewturbineswouldbevisible,ifvisibleatall,giventhehillyterrainthatactstoobscuretherestoftheturbinebodyfromview.TheadditionalturbinesassociatedwithAlternative2arebarelynoticeableandwouldresultinvisualchangesthatareunperceivablecomparedtoAlternative1.LikeAlternative1,theproposedconfigurationofAlternative2allowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.However,itwouldbeasignificantimpacttolocateturbinesaroundByron‐BethanyRoad,GrantLineRoad,TeslaRoad,andVascoRoadwherenoturbinescurrentlyexisteventhoughmotoristsareconsideredmoderatelybutnothighlysensitive.
Forsuchareaswherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,theeffectonthescenicresourcesandthevisualimpactitselfwouldbesignificant.Forthoseareaswithexistingolderturbines,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheEastCountyAreaPlan,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.Therefore,thisimpactispotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,andAES‐2cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐22
October 2014ICF 00323.08
ImpactAES‐3b:Substantiallydamagescenicresources,includingbutnotlimitedtotrees,rockoutcroppings,andhistoricbuildingsalongascenichighway—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Therearenostate‐designatedscenichighwaysintheGoldenHillsProjectarea.GrantLineandMountainHouseRoadsaremorethan1and2miles,respectively,northeastoftheclosestprojectboundaryanddonothaveviewsofthesiteduetointerveningtopography.Inaddition,theproposedRoute239freewaywouldbeatleast2milesnortheastoftheclosestprojectboundary,anditisanticipatedthatthisproposedroutewouldsimilarlynothaveviewsoftheprojectareaduetointerveningtopography.However,therearefourCounty‐designatedscenicroutesinthearea:I‐580,AltamontPassRoad,FlynnRoad,andPattersonPassRoad(Figure3.1‐2).Theseroutesarealreadylinedwithexistingturbines,somotoristsontheseroutesareaccustomedtoviewsofturbines,andalthoughthenew,moreefficientturbineswouldbe41–62meters(135–203feet)tallerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingthreadconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Theproposedconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
Forareaswherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,suchasalongportionsofFlynnRoad,theeffectonthescenicresourcesandthevisualimpactitselfwouldbesignificant.Forthoseareaswithexistingolderturbines,thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheECAP,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.Thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,andAES‐2cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
ImpactAES‐3c:Substantiallydamagescenicresources,includingbutnotlimitedtotrees,rockoutcroppings,andhistoricbuildingsalongascenichighway—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificant)
Therearenostate‐designatedscenichighwaysinthePattersonProjectarea.However,thereisoneCounty‐designatedscenicrouteinthearea:PattersonPassRoad(Figure3.1‐2).PattersonPassisalreadylinedwithexistingturbines,somotoristsonthisrouteareaccustomedtoviewsofturbines,andasdiscussedforImpactAES‐3babove,thenewturbinesarelessvisuallyobtrusive(Figure3.1‐6).Thisconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethe41–62meters(135–203feet)tallerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalso
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐23
October 2014ICF 00323.08
abletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.Thereplacementofthemanyexistingsmallerandolderturbineswithproportionallyfarfewerandlessintrusivefourth‐generationturbineswouldservePolicies170and215oftheECAP,andservetoprotectandenhancescenicvalues.
Thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.Nomitigationisrequired.
ImpactAES‐4a‐1:Substantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthesiteanditssurroundings—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Theprogramprimarilywouldbevisibletorecreationists,arearesidents,motorists,andemployeesofthebusinesses(seeVicinityCharactersectionfordetails).
AsdiscussedintheVicinityCharactersection,theareaismostlycharacterizedbygrass‐covered,roundedhillsandsmoothcontours.Stringsofturbines,pluspowerlines,transformers,accessroads,andsubstationsarethemostvisuallydistinctartificialfeaturethroughoutmostoftheprogramarea.Inaddition,althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Thisconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.Becauseofthis,programimplementationinareaswhereturbinescurrentlyexistwouldnotsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityoftheprogramareaandwouldimproveviewswhereexistingturbinethreadsarereplacewithmuchfewerofthenewlargerturbines.
However,noturbinescurrentlyexistinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea,startingapproximately2.5milessouthofPattersonPassRoad,andthereareotherpatchesthroughouttheprogramareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist(Figure2‐3).Becauseturbinelocationsfortheprogramhavenotyetbeendetermined,itispossiblethatturbineswouldbesitedintheseareas.Theprogramwouldconstructaccessroads,turbines,andtheassociatedfoundations,collectionsystems,andcommunicationsystems,andmeteorologicaltowers.Thiswouldsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterandqualityoftheseareas.
TheareasouthofPattersonPassRoadissparselypopulated.ThereareonlyafewresidencesonTeslaRoad,whichisalsoaCounty‐designatedscenicroute.ThepotentialfutureTeslaRegionalPreserveisinthisarea.Inaddition,theCarnegieStateVehicularRecreationAreaisjustsouthoftheprogramareaboundary(Figure3.1‐2),andtherearevariousrecreationtrailsinthisareaaswell.Newturbinesassociatedwiththeprogramcouldbevisiblefromtheseareas,andresidentsandrecreationistsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewers.Inaddition,motoristsalongTeslaRoadwouldnotbeaccustomedtowindturbinesalongthatroute,andalthoughmotoristsareconsideredmoderatelysensitive,TeslaRoadisaCounty‐designatedscenicroute.
Inaddition,therearenoexistingturbinescurrentlylocatedonaportionofthesitealongFlynnRoad,butthereareturbineswithin0.5milethatarevisiblefromthissite.Turbinesareapartoftheexistingvisualcharacterofthesitevicinity.However,theprojectwouldalsoentailconstructionofaccessroads,turbinesandfoundations,collectionsystem,communicationsystem,and
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐24
October 2014ICF 00323.08
meteorologicaltowersonthisportionofthesite.Thesechangeswouldsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterandqualityofthisundevelopedsite.
AccordingtoPolicy170oftheECAP,AlamedaCountyisobligatedtoprotectnearbyexistingusesfrompotentialvisualandotherimpactsgeneratedbytheconstructionandoperationofwindfarmfacilities(seeRegulatorySettingsection).Severalresidencesinthevicinitywouldhaveviewsofthisportionoftheprojectarea.Becauseresidentsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewers,constructingturbinesinthisareawouldconflictwithPolicy170.Thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
ImpactAES‐4a‐2:Substantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthesiteanditssurroundings—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Theprogramprimarilywouldbevisibletorecreationists,arearesidents,motorists,andemployeesofthebusinesses(seeVicinityCharactersectionfordetails).
AsdiscussedintheVicinityCharactersection,theareaismostlycharacterizedbygrass‐covered,roundedhillsandsmoothcontours.Stringsofturbines,pluspowerlines,transformers,accessroads,andsubstationsarethemostvisuallydistinctartificialfeaturethroughoutmostoftheprogramarea.Inaddition,althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).Asseeninthesimulationsforthisalternative,onlythetopsoftheturbinesandturbinebladesofthesenewturbineswouldbevisible,ifvisibleatall,giventhehillyterrainthatactstoobscuretherestoftheturbinebodyfromview.TheadditionalturbinesassociatedwithAlternative2arebarelynoticeableandwouldresultinvisualchangesthatareunperceivablecomparedtoAlternative1.LikeAlternative1,theconfigurationofAlternative2allowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanunderexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.Becauseofthis,programimplementationinareaswhereturbinescurrentlyexistwouldnotsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityoftheprogramareaandwouldimproveviewswhereexistingturbinethreadsarereplacewithfarfewerofthenewlargerturbines.
However,aswithAlternative1,noturbinescurrentlyexistinthesouthernportionoftheprogramarea,startingapproximately2.5milessouthofPattersonPassRoad,andthereareotherpatchesthroughouttheprogramareawherenoturbinescurrentlyexist(Figure2‐3).Becauseturbinelocationsfortheprogramhavenotyetbeendetermined,itispossiblethatturbineswouldbesitedintheseareas.Theprogramwouldconstructaccessroads;turbines;theassociatedfoundations,
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐25
October 2014ICF 00323.08
collectionsystems,andcommunicationsystems;andmeteorologicaltowers.Thiswouldsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterandqualityoftheseareas.
TheareasouthofPattersonPassRoadissparselypopulated.ThereareonlyafewresidencesonTeslaRoad,whichisalsoaCounty‐designatedscenicroute.ThepotentialfutureTeslaRegionalPreserveisinthisarea.Inaddition,theCarnegieStateVehicularRecreationAreaisjustsouthoftheprogramareaboundary(Figure3.1‐2),andtherearevariousrecreationtrailsinthisareaaswell.Newturbinesassociatedwiththeprogramcouldbevisiblefromtheseareas,andresidentsandrecreationistsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewers.Inaddition,motoristsalongTeslaRoadwouldnotbeaccustomedtowindturbinesalongthatroute,andalthoughmotoristsareconsideredmoderatelysensitive,TeslaRoadisaCounty‐designatedscenicroute.
Inaddition,therearenoexistingturbinescurrentlylocatedonaportionofthesitealongFlynnRoad.Thereareturbineswithin0.5milethatarevisiblefromthissite,buttheyarenotinthenearforeground.Turbinesareapartoftheexistingvisualcharacterofthesitevicinity.However,theprojectwouldconstructaccessroads,turbines,andtheassociatedfoundation,collectionsystem,communicationsystem,andmeteorologicaltowersonthisportionofthesite.Thesechangeswouldsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterandqualityofthisundevelopedsite.Thereseveralresidencesinthevicinitythatwouldhaveviewsofthisportionofthesite.Residentsareconsideredhighlysensitiveviewers.
AccordingtoPolicy170oftheECAP,AlamedaCountyisobligatedtoprotectnearbyexistingusesfrompotentialvisualandotherimpactsgeneratedbytheconstructionandoperationofwindfarmfacilities(seeRegulatorySettingsection).Sincethereresidencesinthevicinitythatwouldhaveviewsofthesite,constructingturbinesonthissitewouldconflictwithPolicy170.Therefore,thisimpactwouldbesignificant,butimplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
ImpactAES‐4b:Substantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthesiteanditssurroundings—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Asfortheprogram,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeprimarilyvisibletorecreationists,arearesidents,motorists,andemployeesofbusinesses(seeVicinityCharactersectionfordetails).
Thenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerandmorewidelyspacedthantheexistingturbineconfiguration,whichdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration(Figures3.1‐3to3.1‐7).RepoweringoftheGoldenHillsProjectwouldbeconductedinareaswhereturbinescurrentlyexistandsowouldnotsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaandwouldimproveviewswhereexistingturbinethreadsarereplacedwithfewerofthenew,largerturbines.Inaddition,althoughI‐580,FlynnRoad,and
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐26
October 2014ICF 00323.08
PattersonPassRoadareCounty‐designatedscenicroutes,motoristsontheseroadsareaccustomedtotheexistingturbinesalongtheseroutes.
Asdiscussedindetailabove,therearenoexistingturbinescurrentlyonaportionofthesitealongFlynnRoad,andconstructingturbinesonthissitewouldsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterandqualityinthisareasignificantlyaffectinghighlysensitiveresidentsinthevicinity.
AccordingtoPolicy170oftheECAP,AlamedaCountyisobligatedtoprotectnearbyexistingusesfrompotentialvisualandotherimpactsgeneratedbytheconstructionandoperationofwindfarmfacilities.Sincethereareresidencesinthevicinitythatwouldhaveviewsofthisarea,constructingturbinesonthissitewouldconflictwithPolicy170.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,andAES‐2c,andAES‐3wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
ImpactAES‐4c:Substantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthesiteanditssurroundings—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
ThePattersonPassProjectwouldbeprimarilyvisibletomotoristsalongPattersonPassRoadandemployeesofnearbybusinesses(seeVicinityCharactersectionfordetails).AsdiscussedintheExistingViewerGroupsandViewerResponsessection,motoristsareconsideredtohavemoderatevisualsensitivity,andemployeesofbusinessesareconsideredtohavelowvisualsensitivity.
ThePattersonPassProjectvicinityischaracterizedbygrassy,rollinghillswithstringsofturbines,transmissionlines,andaccessroads.Thereare317turbinesandassociatedinfrastructureinthePattersonPassprojectarea.ThePattersonPassProjectwouldremovetheexistingturbinesandwouldconstruct8–12turbinesandassociatedfoundationsandinfrastructureonthesite,asdescribedinSection2.6.2,PattersonPassProject.Althoughthenew,moreefficientturbinesarelargerthantheexistingturbines,thenewwidelyspacedconfigurationdetractslessfromthenaturallandscapethantheexistingstringconfiguration.RefertoFigure3.1‐6forarepresentativesimulation.Thisconfigurationallowsforviewsoftherolling,grassyterraintobecomemoreprominent,back‐droppedagainstthesky,andlessinterruptedbyanthropogenicfeatures.Whilethelargerturbineswoulddrawviewers’attentiontowardthem,theeyeisalsoabletofollowtheridgelineofthehillsinamorecohesivemannerthanexistingconditions.Withexistingconditions,theeyeisdrawntoandfocusedonthenumerousturbinesthatcluttertheviewbystickingupandacrossthehillsidesandridgelines.
Forthesereasons,thePattersonPassProjectwouldnotsubstantiallydegradetheexistingvisualcharacterorqualityofthePattersonPassProjectsiteorsurroundingareaandwouldimproveviewsbecausetheexistingturbinethreadswouldbereplacedwithmuchfewerofthenewlargerturbines.Inaddition,althoughPattersonPassRoadisaCounty‐designatedscenicroute,motoristsonthisroadareaccustomedtotheexistingturbinesalongtheroute,andtherearenoothersensitiveviewersinthePattersonPassProjectvicinity.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐27
October 2014ICF 00323.08
AccordingtoPolicy170oftheECAP,AlamedaCountyisobligatedtoprotectnearbyexistingusesfrompotentialvisualandotherimpactsgeneratedbytheconstructionandoperationofwindfarmfacilities.Sincethereresidencesinthevicinitythatwouldhaveviewsofthesite,constructingturbinesonthissitewouldconflictwithPolicy170.Theprojectwouldintroducelarge,visuallyobtrusiveturbineswithinexistingviewsheds.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,andAES‐2cwouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
ImpactAES‐5a‐1:Createanewsourceofsubstantiallightorglarethatwouldadverselyaffectdaytimeornighttimeviewsinthearea—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
AsdiscussedintheprojectdescriptionunderLighting,allrepoweredwindturbineswouldrequireFederalAviationAdministration(FAA)lighting.Thiscouldaffectdaytimeandnighttimeviewsintheprogramarea.However,becausetheprogramwouldreplaceexistingturbinesstringswithmuchfewerofthelarger,moreefficientturbines,theamountofFAA‐requiredlightingintheprogramareaisexpectedtobesimilartoexistingturbinelightingintheprogramarea.Therefore,theproposedprogramwouldnotcreateanewsourceofsubstantiallightintheprogramareathatwouldaffectdaytimeornighttimeviews.
Therearecurrentlyninesubstationsownedandoperatedbythewindcompanieswithintheprogramarea.Onesubstationperprojectisexpectedtoberequiredaspartoftheprogram.Thesesubstationsmaybenewlyconstructed,orexistingsubstationsmaybereconstructedorexpanded.Existingsubstationsmaybereplacedinthesamegenerallocations.Asdescribedintheprojectdescription,underCollectorSubstations,substationswouldbelightedforsafetyandsecurity.Becauseanynewlightswouldbeshieldedordirecteddownwardtoreduceglare,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
Generally,turbinesarepaintedwhite.Becausetheexistingturbineswouldbereplacedwithfarfewerofthelarger,moreefficientturbines,thissourceofglareisexpectedtobereducedinareaswhereturbinescurrentlyexist.However,inareaswherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,theirpresencecouldbeanewsourceofsubstantialglare.Moreover,asstatedintheprojectdescription,thecoloroftowersandrotorsonthenewturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray).
Bladerotationcouldcauseshadowflickerthatcouldbeavisualintrusiontoviewersandcouldbeespeciallydisruptivetoresidentswhowouldbeexposedtotheseconditionsforlongperiodsoftime(DepartmentofEnergyandClimateChangenodate).AsshowninTable2‐2,AlamedaCountyhasdevelopedsetbackrequirementsforsitingturbinesinrelationtocertaintypesoflanduses,andturbineswouldnotbeallowedtobelocatedwithinthesesetbackdistances.However,thesesetbacksmaynotbesufficienttopreventshadowflickerwiththenew,tallerturbines.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐28
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
Whereshadowflickercouldresultfromtheinstallationofwindturbinesproposednearresidences(i.e.,within500meters[1,640feet]inagenerallyeastorwestdirectiontoaccountforseasonalvariations),theprojectapplicantwillprepareagraphicmodelandstudytoevaluateshadowflickerimpactsonnearbyresidences.Noshadowflickerinexcessof30minutesinagivendayor30hoursinagivenyearwillbepermitted.IfitisdeterminedthatexistingsetbackrequirementsasestablishedbytheCountyarenotsufficienttopreventshadowflickerimpactsonresidences,AlamedaCountywillrequireanincreaseintherequiredsetbackdistancestoensurethatresidencesarenotaffected.Ifanyresidenceisaffectedbyshadowflickerwithinthe30‐minute/30‐hourthresholds,theapplicantwillimplementmeasurestominimizetheeffect,suchasrelocatingtheturbine;providingopaquewindowcoverings,windowawnings,landscapebuffers,oracombinationofthesefeaturestoreduceflickertoacceptablelimitsfortheaffectedreceptor;orshuttingdowntheturbineduringtheperiodshadowflickerwouldoccur.Suchmeasuresmaybeundertakeninconsultationwithowneroftheaffectedresidence.Iftheshadowflickerstudyindicatesthatanygiventurbinewouldresultinshadowflickerexceedingthe30‐minute/30‐hourthresholdsandthepropertyownerisnotamenabletowindowcoverings,windowawnings,orlandscapingandtheturbinecannotbeshutdownduringtheperiodofshadowflicker,thentheturbinewillberelocatedtoreducetheeffecttoacceptablelimits.
ImpactAES‐5a‐2:Createanewsourceofsubstantiallightorglarethatwouldadverselyaffectdaytimeornighttimeviewsinthearea—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
UnderAlternative2,21additionalturbinesandassociatedfacilitieswouldbeconstructedintheprogramarea.LightandglareimpactswouldbesimilaratthelocationofanygivenfeaturetothoseunderAlternative1,buttheamountoflightandglarewouldonlyresultinasmallincrementalincreasecomparedwithAlternative1.
AsdiscussedintheprojectdescriptionunderLighting,allrepoweredwindturbineswouldrequireFederalAviationAdministration(FAA)lighting.Thiscouldaffectdaytimeandnighttimeviewsintheprogramarea.However,becausetheprogramwouldreplaceexistingturbineswithfarfewerofthelarger,moreefficientturbines,theamountofFAA‐requiredlightingintheprogramareaisexpectedtobesimilartoexistingturbinelightingintheprogramarea,evenwiththegreaternumberofturbinesthatcouldbeinstalledunderAlternative2.Therefore,theprogramwouldnotcreateanewsourceofsubstantiallightintheprogramareathatwouldaffectdaytimeornighttimeviews.
Onesubstationperprojectisexpectedtoberequiredaspartoftheprogram.Thesesubstationsmaybenewlyconstructed,orexistingsubstationsmaybereconstructedorexpanded.Existingsubstationsmaybereplacedinthesamegenerallocations.Asdescribedintheprojectdescription,underCollectorSubstations,substationswouldbelightedforsafetyandsecurity.Becauseanynewlightswouldbeshieldedordirecteddownwardtoreduceglare,thisimpactwouldbelessthansignificant.
Generally,turbinesarepaintedwhite.Becausetheexistingturbineswouldbereplacedwithfarfewerofthelarger,moreefficientturbines,thissourceofglareisexpectedtobereducedinareaswhereturbinescurrentlyexist.However,inareaswherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,theirpresencecouldbeanewsourceofsubstantialglare.Moreover,asstatedintheprojectdescription,thecolor
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐29
October 2014ICF 00323.08
oftowersandrotorsonthenewturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray).
Bladerotationcouldcauseshadowflickerthatcouldbeavisualintrusiontoviewersandcouldbeespeciallydisruptivetoresidentswhowouldbeexposedtotheseconditionsforlongperiodsoftime.AsshowninTable2‐2,AlamedaCountyhasestablishedsetbackrequirementsforsitingturbineswithincertaintypesoflanduses,andturbineswouldnotbeallowedtobelocatedwithinthesesetbackdistances.However,thesesetbacksmaynotbesufficienttopreventshadowflickerwiththenew,tallerturbines.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐5b:Createanewsourceofsubstantiallightorglarethatwouldadverselyaffectdaytimeornighttimeviewsinthearea—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Liketheprogram,theGoldenHillsProjectwouldrequireFAAlighting.Inadditiontonewturbines,theGoldenHillsProjectisanticipatedtorequiretwonewcollectorsubstations.However,asstatedintheprojectdescriptionunderCollectorSubstations,theexistingsubstationswouldbereplacedinthesamegenerallocationandwouldincludeanoutdoorlightingsystem.However,thenewlightswouldbeshieldedordirecteddownwardtoreduceglare,andthenewsubstationswouldnotemitmorelightthantheexistingsubstations.
Becauseturbinescouldbeinstalledwherenoturbinescurrentlyexist,anewsourceofsubstantialglarecouldbecreated.However,asstatedintheprojectdescription,thecoloroftowersandrotorsonthenewturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray).
Bladerotationcouldcauseshadowflickerthatcouldbeavisualintrusiontoviewersandcouldbeespeciallydisruptivetoresidentswhowouldbeexposedforlongperiodsoftime.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐5c:Createanewsourceofsubstantiallightorglarethatwouldadverselyaffectdaytimeornighttimeviewsinthearea—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
Liketheprogram,thePattersonPassProjectwouldrequireFAAlighting.ImplementationofthePattersonPassProjectwouldreduceglarebecausetherewouldbefarfewerturbinesonthesite,butthelarger,brightwhitesurfacestypicalofturbineswouldhavethepotentialtoincreaseglare.Thisimpactwouldbepotentiallysignificant,butasstatedintheprojectdescription,thecoloroftowersandrotorsonthenewturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray).
Bladerotationcouldcauseshadowflickerthatcouldbeavisualintrusiontoviewersandcouldbeespeciallydisruptivetoresidentswhowouldbeexposedforlongperiodsoftime.ImplementationofMitigationMeasureAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐30
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐6a‐1:Consistencywithstateandlocalpolicies—programAlternative1:417MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
TheCountywouldbeobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthtoprotectvisualresourcesalongscenicroadwaysandopenspaceareasidentifiedforprotection,asdetailedintheScenicRouteandOpenSpaceElementsoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan(AlamedaCounty1966).Inaddition,theCountyisobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthintheECAPtoprotectvisualresourcessuchassensitiveviewsheds,streetsandhighways,scenichighways,andareasaffectedbywindfarms(AlamedaCounty2000).Theturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray)soastoblendwiththesurroundings.However,theproposedprojectwouldstillintroducelarge,visuallyobtrusiveturbineswithinexistingviewshedsofscenicviewshedsinproximitytosensitiveviewersandresidences.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3,andAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐6a‐2:Consistencywithstateandlocalpolicies—programAlternative2:450MW(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
EvenwiththegreaternumberofturbinesthatcouldbeinstalledunderAlternative2,theCountywouldbeobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthtoprotectvisualresourcesalongscenicroadwaysandopenspaceareasidentifiedforprotection,asdetailedintheScenicRouteandOpenSpaceElementsoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan(AlamedaCounty1966).Inaddition,theCountyisobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthintheECAPtoprotectvisualresourcessuchassensitiveviewsheds,streetsandhighways,scenichighways,andareasaffectedbywindfarms(AlamedaCounty2000).Theturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray)soastoblendwiththesurroundings.However,theproposedprojectwouldstillintroducelarge,visuallyobtrusiveturbineswithinexistingviewshedsofscenicviewshedsinproximitytosensitiveviewersandresidences.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3,andAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐31
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐6b:Consistencywithstateandlocalpolicies—GoldenHillsProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
UndertheGoldenHillsProject,theCountywouldbeobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthtoprotectvisualresourcesalongscenicroadwaysandopenspaceareasidentifiedforprotection,asdetailedintheScenicRouteandOpenSpaceElementsoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan(AlamedaCounty1966).Inaddition,theCountyisobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthintheECAPtoprotectvisualresourcessuchassensitiveviewsheds,streetsandhighways,scenichighways,andareasaffectedbywindfarms(AlamedaCounty2000).Theturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray)soastoblendwiththesurroundings.Whiletheproposedprojectwouldreplacesmallerexistingturbineswithlarger,morevisuallyobtrusiveturbineswithinexistingviewsheds,therewillbeconsiderablyfewerturbinesasaresultofrepowering.ImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3,andAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
ImpactAES‐6c:Consistencywithstateandlocalpolicies—PattersonPassProject(lessthansignificantwithmitigation)
UnderthePattersonPassProject,theCountywouldbeobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthtoprotectvisualresourcesalongscenicroadwaysandopenspaceareasidentifiedforprotection,asdetailedintheScenicRouteandOpenSpaceElementsoftheAlamedaCountyGeneralPlan(AlamedaCounty1966).Inaddition,theCountyisobligatedtocomplywithmeasuressetforthintheECAPtoprotectvisualresourcessuchassensitiveviewsheds,streetsandhighways,scenichighways,andareasaffectedbywindfarms(AlamedaCounty2000).Theturbineswouldbeneutralandnonreflective(e.g.,dullwhiteorlightgray)soastoblendwiththesurroundings.However,theproposedprojectwouldstillintroducelarge,visuallyobtrusiveturbineswithinexistingviewshedsofscenicviewshedsinproximitytosensitiveviewersandresidencesImplementationofMitigationMeasuresAES‐2a,AES‐2b,AES‐2c,andAES‐3,andAES‐5wouldreducethisimpacttoaless‐than‐significantlevel.
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐32
October 2014ICF 00323.08
MitigationMeasureAES‐2a:Requiresitedevelopmentreview
MitigationMeasureAES‐2b:Maintainsitefreeofdebrisandrestoreabandonedroadways
MitigationMeasureAES‐2c:Screensurpluspartsandmaterials
MitigationMeasureAES‐3:DonotconstructturbinesontheundevelopedportionoftheGoldenHillsprojectareaalongFlynnRoad
MitigationMeasureAES‐5:Analyzeshadowflickerdistanceandmitigateeffectsorincorporatechangesintoprojectdesigntoaddressshadowflicker
3.1.4 References Cited
AlamedaCounty.1966.ScenicRouteElementoftheGeneralPlan.May.ReprintedJune1974,AmendedMay5,1994.
———.1998.DraftEnvironmentalImpactReport—RepoweringaPortionoftheAltamontPassWindResourceArea.August.StateClearinghouse#98022024.Hayward,CA:AlamedaCountyCommunityDevelopmentAgency.
———.2000.EastCountyAreaPlan.AdoptedMay1994.ModifiedbypassageofMeasureD,effectiveDecember22,2000.Oakland,CA.
CaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation.2012.OfficiallyDesignatedStateScenicHighways.July11.Available:http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic/schwy.htm.Accessed:July11,2013.
DepartmentofEnergyandClimateChange.Nodate.UpdateofUKShadowFlickerEvidenceBase.Finalreport.PreparedbyParsonsBrinckerhoff,NewcastleUponTyne,UK.
EastBayRegionalParkDistrict.2007.EastBayRegionalParkDistrictExistingandPotentialParklandsandTrails.Amendmentofthe1997MasterPlanMapasapprovedbytheBoardofDirectorsonNovember6,2007.
FederalHighwayAdministration.1988.VisualImpactAssessmentforHighwayProjects.(FHWA‐HI‐88‐054.)U.S.DepartmentofTransportation.
Jones,G.R.,J.Jones,B.A.Gray,B.Parker,J.C.Coe,J.B.Burnham,andN.M.Geitner.1975.AMethodfortheQuantificationofAestheticValuesforEnvironmentalDecisionMaking.NuclearTechnology25(4):682–713.SunriseSunset.2013.SunriseSunsetCalendar:CaliforniaLocations.Lastrevised:2013.Available:http://www.sunrisesunset.com/USA/California.asp.Accessed:August27,2013.
TriLink.2014.CorridorConsiderationsandPotentialRoutes.Lastrevised:2012.Available:http://trilink239.org/corridor‐considerations/.Accessed:February24,2014.
U.S.BureauofLandManagement.1980.VisualResourceManagementProgram.(StockNo.024‐001‐00116‐6.)Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
U.S.ForestService.1995.LandscapeAesthetics:AHandbookforSceneryManagement.(AgricultureHandbookNumber701.)
Alameda County Community Development Agency Impact Analysis
Aesthetics
APWRA Repowering Final PEIR 3.1‐33
October 2014ICF 00323.08
U.S.SoilConservationService.1978.ProceduretoEstablishPrioritiesinLandscapeArchitecture.(TechnicalReleaseNo.65.)Washington,DC.