2012 workshop, introduction to lidar workshop, bruce adey and mark stucky (merrick & company)
TRANSCRIPT
Engineering | Architecture | Design-Build | Surveying | GeoSpatial Solutions
September 19, 2012
GIS in the Rockies
presents
Introduction to LiDAR
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 2
Presenter Bio
Bruce Adey, GISP • LiDAR/Photogrammetry Discipline Lead (GeoSpatial Solutions, Merrick & Company) • Geospatial professional since 1999
Professional experience includes working directly with
Project Managers in developing schedules and budgets for current & future projects, supervising the production staff to ensure that the data collected and delivered meets or exceeds industry/client standards, and also technical support and development of MARS® software.
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 3
Presenter Bio
Mark Stucky, GISP
• MARS® Technical Support Specialist Senior GIS Analyst (GeoSpatial Solutions, Merrick & Company)
• Geospatial professional since 1990
• Professional experience includes MARS® software sales, licensing, design, testing, and technical support; ArcGIS geodatabase design, editing, and QC; extensive work with the FEMA DFIRM flood map modernization effort
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 4
Corporate headquarters: Aurora, Colorado Founded in 1955; employee-owned $115M annual revenue (FY11) ~ 500 employees at 10 national + 3 international offices Market Focus
Energy Security Life Sciences Infrastructure
Business Units GeoSpatial Solutions Civil Engineering Solutions Military / Gov’t Facilities Fuels & Energy Science & Technology Nuclear Services & Technology
Corporate Overview
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 5
Office Locations
Los Alamos, NM
Albuquerque, NM Atlanta, GA
Colorado Springs, CO
Guadalajara, Mexico (MAPA)
Ottawa, Canada Aurora, CO
(Headquarters)
Oak Ridge, TN
Mexico City, Mexico (MAPA)
San Antonio, TX
Duluth, GA
Charlotte, NC
Washington, DC
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 6
Workshop Agenda Workshop Objectives LiDAR Technology Review LiDAR Applications Data Processing Workflow Project Data Deliverables <<< 15 minute Break >>> LiDAR Data Demonstration Project Planning (Airborne) LiDAR QC Q & A Online Resources
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 7
Workshop Objectives
• Provide an objective and practical review of project
requirements and technical information regarding airborne LiDAR data acquisition projects
• Educate, communicate and evangelize the benefits of airborne remote sensing, especially as it pertains to LiDAR and the practical applications of laser scanning technologies
• Informal conversation feel free to ask questions!
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 8
LiDAR Technology Overview
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 9
What is LiDAR?
LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) is an active optical technology that uses pulses of laser light to strike the surface of the earth and measure the time of each pulse return to derive an accurate elevation.
LiDAR data acquisition system includes: • LiDAR sensor • Digital camera(s) • Airborne GPS • IMU (Inertial Measurement Unit) • Power Supply / Data Storage • Pilot / Flight Operator
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 10
LiDAR Data Acquisition
Saw Tooth Pattern Used by Optech
Elliptical Pattern Used by the AHAB
DragonEye and TopEye
Rotating Optical Pattern Used by Riegl / TopoSys
Sinusoidal Pattern Used by Leica
• Advantages and disadvantages with each scan pattern (ex. data uniformity, power consumption, duplicate points, accuracy along edge, field of view, etc.)
• Some LiDAR data will look different, based on the sensor
Laser Scan Patterns
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 12
LiDAR Return Display
First Returns Second Returns
Third Returns Fourth Returns
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 13
Cross-section view of trees, rendered by return values
Profile View
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 14
Advantages of LiDAR
Accessibility: LiDAR is a non-intrusive method to collect data in areas of limited, risky, or prohibited access
Day or Night: LiDAR data collection not limited to daylight hours
Collection Area: Large areas may be collected in a short timeframe (ex. 300 – 500 square miles per lift)
Simultaneous Collection: Shortens overall project schedules and reduces post-processing rectification
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 15
Advantages of LiDAR
Multiple Collection Platforms: LiDAR can be collected from fixed-wing aircraft, helicopter, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), truck, train, tripod, etc. Canopy Penetration: LiDAR can penetrate vegetation
canopy to derive ground detail better than traditional photogrammetric approaches Better Accuracy: LiDAR accuracy is much better in
vegetation compared to traditional photogrammetric methods; ±10 cm horizontal, ±15 cm vertical
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 16
Challenges of LiDAR
Data density increasing rapidly! Data volumes growing exponentially!! Optimal weather conditions necessary for data
collection Large point cloud data sets are cumbersome to
store, manage, analyze and distribute Water / snow typically absorbs or scatters laser
pulses
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 17
Common LiDAR Misconceptions LiDAR is a raster data product. False – LiDAR refers to a randomly distributed point cloud data set
First return points are always canopy or last return points are always ground. False – First and last returns can either be ground or canopy
‘Middle’ return information is unnecessary.
False – Client should require that all returns (1 – 4) are present within LiDAR data deliverables (raw and classified)
LiDAR ≠ GIS users Should Not (and cannot in most software) add, delete, or move LiDAR points!
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 18
Data Acquisition Platforms
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 19
Data Acquisition Platforms
Airborne Systems
Fixed Wing Typical Altitude: 3,000’ – 12,000’ feet / 1,000 – 4,000 meters (AGL)
Mainly used for large, wide-area collections
1 – 8 points per square meter
Common to collect LiDAR & digital imagery simultaneously
Rotary (Helicopter) Typical Altitude: 500’ – 2,500’ feet / 200 – 1,000 meters (AGL)
Well-suited for narrow corridors (ex. utility, transportation) and small area, high-density collections
10 – 1,000+ points per square meter!
System may include digital cameras, video camera, meteorological sensors, thermal sensors, etc.
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 21
Airborne LiDAR – Fixed-Wing
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 22
Airborne LiDAR - Helicopter
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 23
Data Differences – Higher LiDAR Density
Helicopter LiDAR Example Approx. 20 - 30 points / square meter
Fixed-Wing LiDAR Example Approx. 1 - 2 points / square meter
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 24
Mobile LiDAR – Road Corridor
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 25
Terrestrial LiDAR – Electric Substation
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 26
LiDAR Applications
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 27
Floodplain Mapping / Inundation Modeling
© 2010 URISA
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 28
Water Resources Modeling
Sediment plume in wetlands from the creek, can’t see this from imagery or other remotely derived elevation sources, heavy vegetation in the area
Watershed Delineation
Streams (blue) Catchments (red)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 30
Transmission Line Mapping
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 31
Utility Vegetation Management
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 32
Transportation - Railroad
© 2010 URISA
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 33
Land Cover Classification
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 34
Land & Commercial Development
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 35
Infrastructure
Historic Preservation / Urban Planning
Geologic Mapping – Karst Study
3D Visualization - Planning
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 39
…More Applications…!!!
Homeland Security Disaster / Emergency Preparedness &
Response Pipeline Mapping Forensic Investigations Conservation Management Mining Levee Recertification Airfield Obstructions (Approach / Take-off) Vegetation Mapping Archaeology
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 40
Data Processing Workflow
Raw LiDAR
LiDAR is collected in a proprietary format, based on the sensor’s manufacturer. This data is typically referred to as “raw” (unprocessed) LiDAR point cloud data.
Sensor manufacturers have their own post-processing software that combines raw scan data with GPS (position) data and IMU (orientation) data to produce a georeferenced LiDAR file (LAS).
At this point, the point cloud data is “dumb” – no data classifications have been assigned; typically organized by individual flight lines
Post-Processing Coverage Check Identifies data voids and verifies that LiDAR dataset covers the entire
project extent
Generate LAS files from hardware vendor’s post-processing software (i.e. merge GPS, IMU and LiDAR sensor inputs based on time)
Validate & adjust relative accuracy of adjacent flight lines Adjust flight line data for roll bias and/or other data collection issues
Shift entire LiDAR point cloud to match ground control points
LAS File Format The LAS file format is an open, public file format for the
interchange of 3D point cloud data between users (as defined by ASPRS)
Developed by ASPRS in conjunction with LiDAR vendors and industry members of the ASPRS Standards Committee
Binary format (smaller); high performance (faster) http://www.asprs.org/society/committees/standards/LiDAR_exchange_format.html
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 44
Which LAS File Format?
The LAS file format and Point Data Record Format determine what information can be stored at the file level and point level
(e.g.; GPS time, RGB info, waveform data)
Includes all relevant LiDAR attributes classification, intensity, return info, timestamp, flightline info, RGB values, etc.
LAS Versions 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 2.0 (under review)
LAS File (Header) Properties
LAS Point Properties
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 47
LiDAR Classification (aka Filtering)
LiDAR data classification is a filtering process by which raw laser data is organized into logical collections (i.e. data layers). The filtering process is based on the point’s
attributes and geometric relationships of the laser data in the point cloud.
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 48
ASPRS LiDAR Data Classifications*
Classification Code Class 0 Created, never classified 1 Unclassified 2 Ground 3 Low Vegetation 4 Medium Vegetation 5 High Vegetation 6 Building 7 Low Point (Noise) 8 Model Keypoints 9 Water 10 Reserved for ASPRS Definition 11 Reserved for ASPRS Definition 12 Overlap Points 13 - 31 Reserved for ASPRS Definition *Source: LAS Specification, Version 1.2
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 49
Point Cloud Classification
The LiDAR data classification value is the only point cloud attribute that can be modified The number, name and description of the point cloud
data classifications is project-specific and must be defined by the client
Typical data classifications include:
1 = Unclassified, 2 and/or 8 = Ground, 3/4/5 = Vegetation, 6 = Buildings, 7 = Low Points / Noise, 9 = Water, 13 = Superseded (junk)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 50
Project Data Deliverables
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 51
Project Data Deliverables
Raw, boresighted LiDAR (organized by flight line) Classified, georeferenced, tiled LiDAR (LAS) data Color Digital Orthophotography Digital Elevation Model – DEM (grids) Linear / polygonal breaklines (hydro-enforcement) Digital Terrain Model – DTM Elevation Contours (topography) Tile Scheme Control Report Project Metadata (FGDC-compliant) Project Summary Report
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 52
Derivative Surface Models
DSM
DEM
DTM
DTM, showing
breaklines
Breaklines
Definition: Linear vector features that describe an abrupt change in the elevation of the terrain which might affect contours, hydrology and other engineering models
Natural breaklines (hard): Ridge lines Toe of hill Edge of water body (ex. pond, lake) or stream
Soft (man-made) breaklines: Roads Retaining Walls Dams
Breaklines - Waterbodies
Elevation Contours (Topography)
15 minute Break
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 57
LiDAR Data Demonstration
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 58
Project Planning (Airborne)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 59
Project Objective?
Understanding & communicating the project objective allows the vendor to properly scope the data collection
plan to meet stated project requirements! What is the purpose of this project? We need updated elevation data for new floodplain
modeling program… The county engineer requires updated terrain model for
storm water / surface water runoff and hydrologic modeling…
The county assessor needs to update GIS system with more accurate elevation data and generate new 2’ contours for the cadastral system…
Project Specifications LiDAR - Ground Sample Distance (GSD) Average distance between LiDAR points on the ground
Can also be expressed in ‘points per square meter’ (PPSM)
Example: One (1) meter GSD to support generation of 2’ contours
LiDAR - Vertical Accuracy Absolute accuracy of LiDAR points to known ground surface
Example 1: ± One (1) foot vertical accuracy at 95% confidence
Example 2: Root Mean Squared Error (RMSEZ) = 0.60 foot = 7.2 inches
Orthophotography (pixel resolution) Example: One (1) foot orthophotos (typically georectified using
LiDAR-derived surface model)
1 meter
1 meter
1 meter Point Spacing
Point Density = 1 point / sq. meter
1 meter
1 meter
0.5 meter Point Spacing
Point Density = 4 points / sq. meter
0.5 meter
0.5 meter
2 meter Point Spacing
2 meters
Point Density = 0.25 points / sq. meter
2 meters
Point Density vs. Point Spacing
Point Density = 1 / Point Spacing2
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 62
Flight Plan Example
LiDAR / Ortho Collection Parameters 131.13 square miles
34 flight lines; 389 flight miles
1 meter GSD
1’ foot color imagery
13,500’ MSL / 5,930’ AGL
34 flight lines; 2,516 photos
12 flight hours
18 photo control / control points
100 knot flight speed
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 63 © 2010 URISA
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 64
‘Forgotten’ Project Issues Data Quality Control (QC) Who is responsible for verifying compliance to the project
specifications? How will QC be completed? What tools are needed to perform comprehensive data QC?
Hardware Resources Data Storage - clients must plan to receive, manage, distribute
and store LiDAR, imagery, and other data deliverables Examples: Classified LAS – 400 MB / mile2
ESRI raster grid (2-foot cell size) - 7 MB / mile2
PC workstations – do users have the proper PC equipment to efficiently visualize, analyze, and process LiDAR deliverables?
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 65
‘Forgotten’ Project Issues
Human Resources End-user training - clients should train & prepare employees on
basic LiDAR concepts prior to data delivery
Clients should obtain necessary LiDAR viewing/processing software in advance to allow time for employees to learn to properly exploit the data
For first-time projects, expect some “ramp-up” time as with any new technology or software
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 66
Other Challenges
Optimal weather conditions necessary for data collection
Leaf-off preferred for best ground penetration
Ground conditions - snow cover and standing water/saturated ground typically absorb or scatter laser pulses
Nearest secure airport with necessary services (ex. fuel)
Accessibility and safety for the crew
Understand your mapping requirements and the purpose for completing a LiDAR project.
Utilize a qualification-based selection process to select your LiDAR consultant.
Stay away from low price bid projects! Price-based selection causes some firms to cut corners (ex. offshore labor) to lower project cost.
Hire a photogrammetric firm that owns a LiDAR sensor.
Request a quality control plan.
Keys to a Successful Project
Dedicate the appropriate number of internal resources to the project.
Know exactly how the quality control is going to be performed by the consultant and internally.
Understand the differences in LiDAR technology. The age of the sensor determines capabilities; pulse rate, roll compensation, field of view are unique to each system.
Determine which accuracy specification is going to be adhered to (i.e. ASPRS, NDEP, etc.)
Keys to a Successful Project
Hybrid accuracy standards should only be used as long as there is very detailed metadata and documentation that clearly explain the accuracy results.
Do not exclude the ground truth surveying from a project.
Request a LiDAR flight plan in the Request For Qualifications that clearly demonstrates the consultant’s understanding of the data acquisition issues.
Keys to a Successful Project
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 70
Factors that Affect Price Size of Project Area Area-of-Interest (AOI) size Very small areas (< 50 square miles) tend to be more
expensive Larger areas tend to cost less per square mile
AOI Shape – irregularly shaped AOIs may increase project cost
Equipment Mobilization (aka ‘mobe’) Cost to move equipment & personnel to/from project area Weather en route can cause delays Vendors seek to ‘bundle’ work in same area to reduce
mobilization fees
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 71
Weather / Flying Conditions Air traffic, inclement weather, dust, humidity affect ability to
acquire airborne data
Platform Choice Helicopter is much more expensive than fixed-wing
Project Specifications (ex. GSD, accuracy, etc.) More aggressive specifications usually cost more to deliver Greater overlap or cross flights may be needed (vegetation)
Factors that Affect Price
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 72
Project Data Deliverables / Delivery Schedule
Map Accuracy Specifications ASPRS, FEMA, USGS…….select one! Accuracy reporting specifications Example: USGS - Fundamental Vertical Accuracy (FVA)
Quality Control Process Project & client specific – requires coordination
Factors that Affect Price
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 73
LiDAR Quality Control
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 74
QC Introduction
Many automated steps and mechanical devices that can cause systematic error
Good LiDAR companies understand both their procedures and equipment
Knowing sources of error can help prevent issues and check for them
Known mechanical / system error can often be corrected
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 75
QC Recommendations
Require a QC plan & a report as part of the project deliverables!
A well-written quality control plan must be tailored to properly analyze data deliverables, especially as it relates to meeting / exceeding the project objective and vertical accuracy specifications
QC analysis must be quantifiable and representative of the entire data set
Client / end-users must have sufficient technical knowledge to understand QC results (and how issues can be mitigated!)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 76
True or False?
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 77
Poor quality data is often the trade-off to push the price down
Data providers vary the procedure, frequency, and extent of their LiDAR calibration
Less-skilled (cheaper) technicians and operators may not recognize when problems, failures, and errors occur
Often times, little or no documented QA / QC procedures to validate approach or allow for testing duplication
Vendor may not provide a summary report or ground control report
Quality vs. Cost?
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 78
Some vendors “cheat” to get around proper calibration and other QC tasks
Clipping off or reclassifying edge lap to avoid dealing with LiDAR boresight
Shifting tiles to a custom geoid (derived from the vertical error to ground control)
Some vendors can hide error through other creative techniques (especially if they discover problems after the plane has left the project site!!!)
Quality vs. Cost?
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 79
Potential Sources of Error
Planning
Incorrect project boundary (missing buffer) Wrong horizontal and/or vertical datum Coordinate conversions & translations (ex. US foot
vs. international survey foot) GSD inadequate to meet accuracy expectations Pulse rate not correct for desired flying altitude and
vertical accuracy Field of view too wide for adequate penetration in
vegetation Too small edge lap could cause data voids (missing
data)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 80
Potential Sources of Error
During the Mission
Electrical problem or equipment failure (ground-based or airborne)
System operator error Pilot error (not following flight plan) Weather and/or ground conditions
Post-processing
Incorrect boresighting Auto and manual classification (filtering) Poor breakline compilation
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 81
Visual QC Approaches
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 82
Flight Line Information
Non-unique flight line IDs. Flight line ID 1 (green) is shifted +1 foot. Flight line ID
1 (green) is not shifted. This data cannot be corrected.
Unique flight line IDs. Flight line ID 4 (pink) is shifted +1 foot. Flight line ID 5 (yellow) is not shifted. This data can be
corrected.
• Flight line info allows for a quality control check to be performed in overlap areas • If a shift is detected within a flight line, this shift can be corrected if flight line
information is present • You should request unique flight line information in your LiDAR dataset
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 83
Viewing LiDAR points by classification values Overlaying contours generated by flight line
Comparing same X,Y location from adjacent flight
lines ( Z or flight line separation) Hillshade analysis of ground classifications – “pits”
and “spikes”
Other Visual QC Methods
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 84
Visual Hillshade Analysis (Ground)
Allows users to visually inspect the ground classification for anomalies. Quickly identifies the effectiveness of bare-earth extraction capabilities of the vendor.
Points rendered by data classification
Hillshade image of the ground class
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 85
Visual Analysis - Profile View
Profile of Ground & Vegetation Classes
Profile of Ground Class
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 86
Quantitative QC Approaches
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 87
LAS File Statistics A simple method to analyze LiDAR data deliverables is to review the statistics of the point cloud.
Zmin & Zmax provide insight into data filtering results Point Density Average Ground Sample Distance (GSD) Return Information (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) Data Classifications – has the data been classified into
the specified classes? Flightline information – is it present? Statistics allow users to thematically map results in GIS
applications, which can help identify “problem” areas, trends or data anomalies
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 88
Control Report To verify compliance to the project’s vertical accuracy
specification, vendors compare ground control “checkpoints” to the derived ground classification / surface
American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), National Map Accuracy Standards (NMAS) and National Standard for Spatial Data Accuracy (NSSDA) maintain their own vertical accuracy specifications
Can also be used to report the attainable accuracy of contours generated from smoothed, gridded LiDAR data
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 89
USGS-NGP LiDAR Base Specification Version 1.0
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 90
Purpose and Scope USGS: “The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
intends to use this specification to acquire and procure light detection and ranging (lidar) data, and to create consistency across all USGS National Geospatial Program (NGP) and partner funded lidar collections, in particular those undertaken in support of the National Elevation Dataset (NED).”
The USGS specification is the basis for most of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA, 2009) funded LiDAR projects in the U.S.; often used as a SOW document for many non-ARRA funded LiDAR projects
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 91
USGS LiDAR Specification “Unlike most other “lidar data procurement specifications”,
which are focused on the products derived from lidar point cloud data; such as the bare-earth Digital Elevation Model (DEM), this specification places unprecedented emphasis on the handling of the source lidar point cloud data.”
Defines minimum parameters for compliance; additional project upgrades listed (ex. increased vertical accuracy)
Specification divided into four (4) main sections: Collection Data Processing and Handling Hydro-Flattening Requirements Data Deliverables
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 92
Collection Requirements
Returns (minimum of three) Intensity values Point Density / Nominal Point Spacing (NPS) Data Voids Spatial Distribution Verification Scan Angle Vertical Accuracy Relative Accuracy Flightline Overlap Collection Area (coverage check) Collection Conditions (weather)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 93
Data Processing & Handling Requirements
LAS Format (v1.2 or v1.3) Waveform Data (*.wdp auxiliary files) GPS Time Type Datums (horizontal & vertical) Projections Units of Measure File Sizes File Source ID (unique per swath)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 94
Data Processing & Handling Requirements
Point Families (return information) Swath Coverage Noise Classes & Withheld Points Overlap Points Positional Accuracy Validation Classification Accuracy / Consistency Tiles (orientation and overlap)
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 95
Hydro-Flattening
LiDAR only – no breaklines defining water boundaries
Hydro-Flattened LiDAR
Visual only – no automated testing yet
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 96
Other Standards
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 97
Industry Accuracy Standards
Guidelines for Digital Elevation Data (released by the NDEP (National Digital Elevation Program.) Guidelines are available online at http://www.ndep.gov/NDEP_Elevation_Guidelines_Ver1_10May2004.pdf ASPRS Guidelines Vertical Accuracy Reporting for
LiDAR Data. Guidelines were subsequently adopted from NDEP, and are available online at http://www.asprs.org/society/committees/LIDAR/Downloads/Vertical_Accuracy_Reporting_for_LIDAR_Data.pdf
Copyright © 2010 Merrick & Company All rights reserved.
PREXXXX 98
The USGS (United States Geologic Survey) publishes an accuracy standard called the NMAS (National Map Accuracy Standard.) This document is available online at http://rockyweb.cr.usgs.gov/nmpstds/nmas.html The FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee) is
an interagency committee that created the NSSDA. This set of guidelines are available online at http://www.fgdc.gov/standards
Industry Accuracy Standards
Questions?
Contact Information
Bruce Adey, GISP LiDAR/Photogrammetry Discipline Lead
E-mail: [email protected] Direct: (303) 353-3949
Mark A. Stucky, GISP MARS® Technical Support Specialist Senior GIS Analyst
E-mail: [email protected] Direct: (303) 353-3933
Thank You!
Online LiDAR Resources
USGS-NGP LiDAR Base Specification Version 1.0 http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/11b4/TM11-B4.pdf
FEMA Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/gs_main.shtm
ASPRS LAS Specification http://www.asprs.org/society/committees/standards/lidar_exchange_format.html
USGS Center for LiDAR Information Coordination and Knowledge (CLICK) http://lidar.cr.usgs.gov/
Online LiDAR Resources
International LiDAR Mapping Forum (ILMF) http://www.lidarmap.org
SPAR Point Group http://www.sparpointgroup.com/
LiDAR News http://lidarnews.com/
National LIDAR Dataset (USA) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_LIDAR_Dataset_-_USA
USGS National Elevation Dataset (NED) http://ned.usgs.gov/