2012 acuho-i construction and renovation...
TRANSCRIPT
2018 ACUHO-I Construction
& Renovation Survey
Findings
Presented by:
Ray Thompson, Vice President Higher Education
Services
MGT Consulting Group
ACUHO-I/APPA Housing Facilities Conference
Pittsburgh, PA
October 30, 2018
Introduction
1
History of the Survey – Jim Grimm
ACUHO-I and MGT Collaboration
Project Goals and Objectives
Establish a national data set that is reliable, useful, and
easily accessible for institutional planning
Purpose of Presentation
2
Review key results from the 2018 survey of 139
colleges and universities.
Identify trends over past iterations of the
survey.
Facilitate discussion among facilities
professionals concerning the value of the
data gathered through the survey and the
most critical components of the instrument.
Survey Results
3
Responding Institutions
4
1,519 Institutions Contacted
• 944 ACUHO-I members and 575 non-members
139 Respondents ~ 9.2% Response Rate
Institution Type:
− 92% Four-Year, 3% Two-Year, 5% Other
− 74% Public, 26% Private, 0% Other
Average on campus housing capacity = 3,025 (Median = 3,200, Range = 98 to 17,865)
61% have an on-campus residency requirement
Construction or Renovation Completed,
Winter 2016 - Fall 2017
5
Responding institutions reported 45 new construction
projects and 119 renovation projects, although full details
were not reported for all projects.
More than one-third of respondents reported no renovation
or construction on campus over the previous two years.
New Construction
Findings
6
2014 2016 2018
Institutions Reporting 66 46 42
New Construction Projects 76 49 45
Reason Facility Was Built
7
Intended Market
8Note: Percentages do not total 100%, as respondents could select multiple intended markets.
Occupancy Type
9
0-25% 26-50% 51-75% 76-100%
Single-occupancy bedrooms 70% 8% 0% 23%
Double-occupancy bedrooms 23% 0% 23% 55%
Triple-occupancy bedrooms 98% 3% 0% 0%
Share of Beds in New Facility by Occupancy Type
10
Construction Cost Per GSF Trends
2004 through 2016 Surveys
Project Funding Mechanisms
11
LEED Certification Trends for Project
12
Sustainability Features of Renovated
Facilities and Reason*
13
Conserve
Resources
Improve
Student
Quality of Life
Air quality controls 59% 66%
Building envelope insulation 83% 52%
Dual- flush or low flow toilets 62% 21%
Energy efficient windows 90% 38%
Green roofs 3% 3%
HVAC system efficiencies 76% 41%
In-room occupancy sensors for lighting 55% 28%
In-room occupancy sensors for HVAC 17% 17%
LED or CFL lighting fixtures 86% 55%
Rainwater collection tank 10% 0%
Solar panels for hot water 21% 3%
Use of building materials with recycled content 41% 21%
Water bottle filling stations 59% 69%
Window open sensor for HVAC 3% 7%
*Of the 29 new projects with reported sustainability features.
Respondents could indicate that a feature was included to both conserve
resources and improve student quality of life
Renovation
Findings
14
2014 2016 2018
Institutions Reporting 124 83 83
Total Renovation Projects 284 151 96
Rehab and Modified Rehab Projects 42 31 44
Rehab/Modified Rehab as a % of Total 15% 21% 46%
Reason for Renovation (all respondents)
15
Update facilities (85 responses)
Meet the needs/interests of students (59 responses)
Provide higher levels of privacy (14 responses)
Meet the demand for additional beds (12 responses)
Trends in Project Cost Per GSF
16
Trends in Renovation Cost Per GSF
17
17
Project Includes Rental Rate Increase
(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
18
n = 40
Method of Project Funding
(Rehab/Modified Rehab)
19 The college/university is responsible for the debt in 100% of
the debt financed projects (15 responses).
Sustainability Features of Renovated
Facilities and Reason*
20*Of the 71 projects with reported sustainability features.
Respondents could indicate that a feature was included to both conserve resources and
improve student quality of life
Conserve
Resources
Improve
Student
Quality of Life
Air quality controls 25% 44%
Building envelope insulation 20% 20%
Dual- flush or low flow toilets 49% 18%
Energy efficient windows 37% 23%
Green roofs 1% 0%
HVAC system efficiencies 51% 42%
In-room occupancy sensors for lighting 18% 8%
In-room occupancy sensors for HVAC 6% 6%
LED or CFL lighting fixtures 77% 44%
Rainwater collection tank 0% 0%
Solar panels for hot water 1% 0%
Use of building materials with recycled content 35% 13%
Water bottle filling stations 23% 27%
Window open sensor for HVAC 0% 0%
