2010 pca ee awards

Upload: mkpq

Post on 07-Jul-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    1/20

    PORTLAND CEMENT ASSOCIATION SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING

          2

          0      1      0

     Preserving OurWorld 

    SUSTAINABLE

    MANUFACTURING

    AWARDS

    Energy & Environment Awards Safety Innovation Awards

    Chairman’s Safety Performance Awards Terminal Safety Awards

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    2/20

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    3/20

    ENVIRONMENTAL SPIRITIn 2000, the Portland Cement Association launched a program

    to foster continuous environmental improvement in the U.S.cement industry. One element of the program is to recognize

    individual facilities that have shown a commitment to continuous

    environmental and energy efficiency improvement.

    PCA and Cement Americas  magazine presented the first

    cement industry awards in 2002 to the winners for 2001. The

    awards program is open to any cement manufacturing plant

    in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The awards honor

    activities conducted during the previous calendar year.

    Since its inception, the program has relied on judges

    representing diverse organizations within and outside theindustry, including federal government agencies; trade

    associations; trade publications; and non-profit wildlife

    conservation and environmental resource groups.

    The judges for the 2010 E&E Awards Program represented the

    following agencies/organizations: National Ready Mixed Concrete

    Association, U.S. EPA-ENERGY STAR, U.S. EPA-Office of Policy,

    Economics, and Innovation, Cement Association of Canada,

    Cement Americas, U.S. Geological Survey, World Resources

    Institute, and the World Wildlife Fund.

    2

    PCA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT AWARDS 2010

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    4/20

     Preserving OurWorld 

    3

    VOLUNTARY CODE

    OF CONDUCTTo transform its commitment to sustainable devel-opment into consistent, tangible actions, PCA has

    developed the Cement Manufacturing Sustainability

    (CMS) Program. The goal of the program is to balance

    society’s need for cement products with stewardship

    of the air, land, and water, conservation of energy

    and natural resources, and maintenance of safe work

    places and communities. The centerpiece of the CMS

    Program is a voluntary code of conduct, which is a set

    of principles, performance measures, and a reporting

    protocol, designed to guide decision making, business

    practices, and operating performance in a sustainable

    fashion.

    The PCA Board of Directors in 1991 adopted seven

    principles that call on member companies in the U.S.

    to meet market demands while using environmentally

    responsible practices that minimize emissions, waste,

    energy consumption, and the use of raw materials.

    Taken together, these principles help U.S. manufac-

    turers to integrate the economic, social, and environ-

    mental dimensions of cement manufacturing, and

    to find a balance between short-term priorities and

    long-term needs.

    1. The safety and health of our employees, our neigh-bors, and our customers is our first consideration in

    the production and distribution of a quality product

    PORTLAND CEMENT

    MANUFACTURING ISA FOUR-STEP PROCESS:1. Raw materials, including limestone and small

    amounts of sand and clay, come from quarries

    usually located near the cement manufacturing

    plant. Limestone is typically about 80% of the raw

    mix and is the source of calcium. The remaining

    raw materials provide silica and the necessary

    small amounts of alumina and iron.

    2. The materials are carefully analyzed, precisely

    combined and blended, and then ground for

    further processing.

    3. The ground materials are heated in an industrial

    furnace, called a kiln; kilns are a rotating vessel

    ranging in length from 60 to more than 200 meters

    (200 to >650 feet) long with a diameter rang-

    ing from 3 to 7.5 meters (10 to 25 feet). The kiln

    reaches temperatures of 1,450° C (2,650° F).

    The heat causes the materials to turn into a new

    marble-sized substance called clinker. The kiln

    flame is fueled by powdered coal, powdered

    petroleum coke, natural gas, oil, and/or recycled

    materials burned for energy recovery.

    4. Red-hot clinker is cooled and ground with a smallamount of gypsum. The end-result is a fine powder

    called portland cement. At each stage, process

    data are continuously monitored to produce a high-

    quality product, improve energy efficiency, and

    minimize emissions.

    Cement or Concrete?The terms cement and

    concrete are often

    misused. Cement is an

    ingredient of concrete.

    It is the fine powder that,

    when mixed with water,

    sand, and gravel orcrushed stone, forms the

    rock-like mass known

    as concrete. Cement acts

    as the binding agent or

    glue in concrete.

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    5/20

    PCA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT AWARDS 2010

    2. We will continue to implement effective controls,

    which reduce or eliminate the release of pollutants

    to the air, to the land, and/or to the water.

    3. We will actively seek ways to manage wastes in a

    responsible and environmentally sound manner.

    4. We will pursue effective improvements in

    energy efficiency and promote the conservation

    of resources.

    5. We will seek ways to beneficially and safely utilize

    recyclable wastes as raw materials, fuels, and prod-

    uct components as part of our overall commitment

    to waste minimization and recycling.

    6. We will continue to conduct mining operations ina responsible and environmentally sound manner.

    7. We will participate with lawmakers, regulators, and

    other interested parties in the development of ratio-

    nal and effective health, safety, and environmental

    laws and regulations.

    ENVIRONMENTALPERFORMANCEMEASURESThe Environmental Performance Measures translate

    the Cement Manufacturing Sustainability Program

    Principles into action. A long-term reduction target is

    identified for each key performance measure and then

    progress toward that target is measured against

    a baseline. Currently there are four goals approved by

    the PCA members:

    Carbon Dioxide (CO2)—The U.S. cement industry has

    adopted a year 2020 voluntary target of reducing CO2 

    emissions by 10% (from a 1990 baseline) per ton of

    cementitious product produced or sold.

    Cement Kiln Dust (CKD)—The U.S. cement industry

    has adopted a year 2020 voluntary target of a 60%

    reduction (from a 1990 baseline) in the amount of

    CKD landfilled per ton of clinker produced.

    Environmental Management Systems (EMS)—The

    U.S. cement industry has adopted a voluntary target of

    at least 40% of U.S. cement plants having implement-

    ed an auditable and verifiable EMS by 2006, 75% of

    the U.S. plants implementing an EMS by the end of

    2010, and with 90% by the end of 2020.

    Energy Efficiency—The U.S. cement industry

    has adopted a year 2020 voluntary target of 20%

    improvement (from a 1990 baseline) energy

    efficiency—as measured by total Btu-equivalent

    per unit of cementitious product.

    With these ambitious goals, cement manufacturers

    will reduce their environmental impact and energy

    burden. Additional energy and environmental benefits

    will be realized by the use of concrete in the construc-

    tion of buildings and pavements. Portland cement

    concrete is a durable product that can provide years

    of benefits.

    4

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    6/20

     Preserving OurWorld 

    5

    This category honors

    facilities that go beyond

    laws, permits, and

    regulations to minimize

    their impact on the

    environment.

    Runners Up:

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Theodore, Alabama 

    Lafarge North

    America Inc.

    Seattle, Washington.

    Finalist:

    Lafarge North

    America Inc.

    Alpena, Michigan 

    By connect- ing the plant to

    a third energy

    source in 2009,

    landfill gas

    replaced

    17% of the

    plant’s fossil

    fuels which

    offsets more

    than 30,000

    tons of coal

    carbon dioxide.

    Winner:

    Lafarge North America Inc., Sugar Creek, Missouri

    The Lafarge Sugar Creek facility completed a range of projects in 2009

    to increase the amount of alternative raw materials and fuels used by th

    plant while continuing to keep emissions significantly below permit limi

    By connecting the plant to a third energy source in 2009, landfill gas

    replaced 17% of the plant’s fossil fuels, which offsets more than 30,00

    tons of carbon dioxide generated from coal combustion. Modifications tits alternative solid fuels facility allowed the Sugar Creek plant to double

    the percent of fossil fuel replacement—to 20%. In 2009, the facility uti

    lized limestone fines from an adjacent quarry to replace more than 14%

    of the limestone needs of the kiln. The plant also substitutes 35.8% of

    non-limestone raw materials with a range of non-hazardous industrial

    wastes such as bottom ash, boiler slag, foundry sands, and mill scale.

    ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    7/20

    INNOVATIONWinner: 

    Lafarge North America Inc., Tulsa, OklahomaIn 2009 the Tulsa Lafarge plant took advantage of an alternative

    fuel opportunity that builds upon a waste stream the industry has

    been using for years. Most tire-derived fuel use is based on used

    tires, but the Tulsa plant worked with Goodyear, Inc., to divert rubber

    manufacturing waste from landfills and into the cement kiln. The plant

    accepts bagged scrap rubber and malformed rubber components

    which are delivered to a mid-kiln injection system by way of a high-

    angle conveyor. In addition, the plant utilizes 100% Biogas from a

    nearby landfill for the drying of raw materials and up to a 20%

    substitution of the kiln fuel needs.

    This category recognizesthe development and

    application of innovative

    technologies relevant to

    environmental protec- 

    tion or energy efficiency.

    Runner Up:

    Lafarge North

    America Inc. 

    Bath, Ontario 

    Finalist:

    Lafarge NorthAmerica Inc. 

    Alpena, Michigan 

    Most tire-derivedfuel use is based

    on used tires,

    but the Tulsa

    plant worked

    with Goodyear,

    Inc., to divert

    rubber manufac- 

    turing waste from

    landfills and into

    the cement kiln.

    6

    PCA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT AWARDS 2010

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    8/20

     Preserving OurWorld 

    7

    OUTREACHWinner:

    Holcim (US) Inc., Theodore, Alabama

    The Holcim plant and its employees in Theodore support a range of

    environmental projects in their community. In 2009, plant employees

    were zone captains for cleanup of the Theodore Industrial Canal as

    part of the 22nd annual Alabama Coastal Cleanup Day sponsored by

    the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

    Seventy-one plant and community volunteers removed more than

    1.5 tons of debris from the banks and waters of the canal. The plant

    also worked with the Alabama Coastal Foundation in the evaluation of

    the shoreline of the Fowl River. Those assessments will assist local

    decision makers regarding river restoration, preservation, and

    recreational uses. The plant continues to assist with the local Used

    Electronics Recycling Days, which collected nearly 200,000 pounds

    of unwanted electronic devices in 2009.

    This category honors

    activities that enhance

    community, employee,

    and government

    relations.

    Runners Up:

    CEMEX

    Xenia, Ohio 

    Finalists:

    Titan America LLC

    Troutville, Virginia 

    Lehigh Hanson

    Materials Limited

    Edmonton, Alberta 

    71 plant and

    community

    volunteers

    removed more

    than 1.5 tons of

    debris from the

    banks and

    waters of

    the canal.

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    9/20

    ENERGY EFFICIENCY

    Winner:

    CalPortland, Colton, California

    The CalPortland plant in Colton completed several unique energy

    reduction projects in 2009. The facility has a comprehensive intranet

    site that displays-energy performance information in dollars, energy

    units, and specific energy. Several new installation upgrades lead to

    tremendous energy savings. New high efficiency separator, baghouse,

    and material-handling equipment will save nearly 7 million kWh annu-

    ally for finish cement grinding; the completion of a kiln air leak reduc-

    tion program will save more than 5.7 million kWh; and the installation of

    a new cement terminal is expected to save more than 3.7 million kWh.These and other initiatives resulted in the plant scoring a perfect 100

    through ENERGY STAR’s EPI benchmarking tool. In addition, Colton

    has also established national accounts with suppliers which include

    energy efficiency as part of their contracts.

    This category focuses on

    energy planning,

    applications of efficient

    technologies and practic- 

    es, and climate change

    mitigation efforts.

    Runner Up:

    Lafarge North

    America Inc.

    Tulsa, Oklahoma 

    Finalists:

    Salt River Materials

    Group / Phoenix

    Cement Company

    Clarkdale, Arizona 

    St. Marys Cement Inc.

    (Canada) / VCNA

    Bowmanville, Ontario 

    New high

    efficiency

    separator, bag- 

    house, and

    material

    handling

    equipment

    will save nearly

    7 million kWh

    annually for

    finish cement

     grinding.

    8

    PCA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT AWARDS 2010

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    10/209

     Preserving OurWorld 

    LAND STEWARDSHIPWinner:

    CEMEX, Xenia, Ohio

    The CEMEX Xenia facility has approached its land stewardship tasks

    as a cooperative effort with the community, Cedarville University, and

    the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. In 2009, the plant and its

    partners began the first phase of the eradication of a 4.5-acre kudzu

    infestation, a non-native, invasive vine. After careful evaluation,

    a plant specific, systemic herbicide was selected and targeted

    application completed. The eradication will help to return the area

    to native vegetation and to educate the local community on kudzu

    control and elimination. Another project with university assistance is

    the monitoring of a 47-acre native grassland habitat at a former clay

    mine that will foster nesting habitat for grassland birds. The reclama-

    tion plan is based on United States Fish and Wildlife Service and

    Audubon Society guidelines, which exceed mining regulations.

    This category recognizes

    efforts to protect and

    enhance the surrounding

    land and wildlife.

    Runners Up:

    CEMEX

    Lyons, Colorado 

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Alpena, Michigan 

    Finalists:

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Bath, Ontario 

    Lafarge North America Inc. 

    Alpena, Michigan 

    A university-

    assisted project

    is the monitor- 

    ing of a 47-acre

    native grassland

    habitat at a

    former clay mine

    that will foster

    nesting habitat

    for grassland

    birds.

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    11/20

    OVERALL ENVIRONMENTAL

    EXCELLENCEWinner:Lafarge North America Inc., Bath, Ontario

    In 2009, the Lafarge Bath plant completed a range of environmental

    and energy efficiency projects. As part of its climate change and energy

    efficiency programs, university researchers have planted hybridized

    willow species at the facility and other crops as possible renewable

    biomass sources. The facility also worked with local farmers to raise

    crops for a future trial biomass burn, and more than 950 bales of

    plant material have been collected. With the installation of axial

    blower technology, the plant improved kiln operation and increased theutilization of petroleum coke, an oil refinery byproduct. This modifica-

    tion lowered sulfur and carbon dioxide emissions as well as fuel

    consumption. With additional kiln operation and quarry changes, the

    facility has nearly eliminated cement kiln dust (CKD) production.

    Likewise, the CKD monofills were improved because little to no CKD

    will be produced in the future. Lastly with the help of 250 local scouts,

    leaders, and parents, the facility planted 3,000 trees on the plant

    property for habitat restoration and climate change education

    and mitigation.

    This award recognizes a

    facility that demonstrates

    excellence in multiple

    categories.

    Runners Up:

    CEMEX

    Lyons, Colorado 

    Lafarge North

    America Inc.

    Alpena, Michigan 

    As part of its

    climate change

    and energy

    efficiency

    programs,

    university

    researchershave planted

    hybridized

    willow species

    at the facility

    and other crops

    as possible

    renewable

    biomass

    sources.

    10

    PCA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT AWARDS 2010

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    12/2011

    2010 Energy and Environment Award Nominees

    Ash Grove Cement Company, Chanute, Kansas

    CalPortland, Colton, California

    CEMEX, Demopolis, Alabama

    CEMEX, Knoxville, Tennesse

    CEMEX, Louisville, Kentucky

    CEMEX, Lyons, Colorado

    CEMEX, Victorville, California

    CEMEX, Xenia, Ohio

    Essroc Canada Inc., Picton, Ontario

    GCC of America, Pueblo, Colorado

    GCC of America, Tijeras, New Mexico

    Holcim (US) Inc., Theodore, Alabama

    Holcim (US) Inc., Florence, Colorado

    Lafarge North America Inc., Alpena, Michigan

    Lafarge North America Inc., Bath, Ontario

    Lafarge North America Inc., Fredonia, Kansas

    Lafarge North America Inc., Kamloops, British Columbia

    Lafarge North America Inc., Richmond, British Columbia

    Lafarge North America Inc., Seattle, Washington

    Lafarge North America Inc., Sugar Creek, Missouri

    Lafarge North America Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Lehigh Hanson Materials Limited, Edmonton, Alberta

    Mitsubishi Cement Corporation, Lucerne Valley, California

    Salt River Materials Group / Phoenix Cement Company, Clarkdale, Arizona

    St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) / VCNA, Bowmanville, Ontario

    Titan America LLC, Troutville, Virginia

     Preserving OurWorld 

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    13/20 12

    Less than 190,000 Employee Hours

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Paulding, Ohio 

    Lehigh Cement Company

    Cementon, New York 

    Lehigh Cement Company

    Bellingham, Washington 

    190,000 – 270,000 Employee Hours

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Tulsa, Oklahoma 

    Lehigh Cement Company

    Mitchell, Indiana 

    CalPortland

    Rillito, Arizona 

    More than 270,000 Employee Hours

    Alamo Cement Company

    San Antonio, Texas 

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Midlothian, Texas 

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Ste. Genevieve, Missouri 

      CHAIRMAN’S SAFETY

    PERFORMANCE

    AWARDS

    Each year, PCA chooses the plants with the best

    safety performance records and awards them with

    the Chairman’s Safety Performance Award. This year,

    the records of 125 portland cement plants operating in

    the United States and Canada were reviewed to deter- 

    mine which ones achieved the best accident records

    in the field. Accident rates are based on the number

    of injuries and illnesses per 100 employees, and none

    of these plants had an accident rate above 1. Several

    of the plants had no accidents in 2009.

    Three plants in three categories designated by the

    number of hours that employees collectively worked in

    2009 are recognized this year for achieving superior

    safety records. Working to continuously improve safety

    and health in the workplace, employees at these nine

    plants set a standard for safety excellence that

    promotes safety and health protections throughout

    the year.

    PCA CHAIRMAN’S SAFETY PERFORMANCE AWARDS

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    14/20

     Safety FollowsWisdom

    13

    Milling and Grinding

    Electric Fan Motor Hoist

    Repairing, cleaning, and balancing large process fans with rated

    capacities in the 1750 to 3000 HP range requires rotating the fan

    blades, which necessitates a lot of heavy lifting. To facilitate the job,

    employees at the CalPortland Mojave cement plant purchased a small

    electric motor cable hoist and fabricated a base to attach to the door

    frame on the fan housing. A fabricated “fan hook” attached to a blade

    works to both move and stop the blades. The hoist control is outside th

    fan housing, so employees don’t come into contact with moving parts.

    This innovation transformed a dirty, risky, and physically demanding job

    into a standardized process that is used throughout the plant.

    CalPortland

    Mojave, California 

    Mill Motor Guard Redesign 

    Motivated by having to work on a cumbersome mill motor guard that

    required the guard to be removed in two separate pieces, employees at

    the GCC Rio Grande Tijeras cement plant designed a metal plate device

    that allows the guard to be removed in one single piece. Prior to usingthe newly designed piece, employees had to

    position the motor guard so that bolt holes were

    properly aligned with their bolts – all while stand-

    ing on a ladder! The redesign involved machining

    the metal plates, relocating the angle iron on the

    guard door, and welding pins to the main guard

    frame. The new process is safer and requires

    less physical exertion.

    GCC of America

    Tijeras, New Mexico

    In this year’s Safety Innovation- 

    Awards, PCA chose plants’

    innovative projects that achieve

    the objectives of the Occupational

    Health and Safety Committee: to

    recognize and reward creative

    projects in the portland cement

    industry; to communicate these

    ideas to North American cement

    manufacturers; and to elevate the

    importance of innovative solutionsto safety challenges in the portland

    cement industry. Winning entries

    came from four categories this

     year: Milling and Grinding,

    Pyroprocessing, Distribution, and

    General Facility. Along with PCA,

    these awards are sponsored by the

    Cement Association of Canada and

    Cement Americas magazine.

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    15/20

    PCA SAFETY INNOVATION AWARDS 2010

    14

    Mill Hatch Door Opening System

    Even after a short period of time, mill doors tend to stick tightly due to

    ball fragments, cured cement, or other materials that wedge or bind

    to the door and its seal. Employees at the Ash Grove Texas plant in

    Midlothian devised a new way to open mill doors. The typical way to

    open the doors involves workers scaling a 38-foot diameter mill using

    harnesses and lanyards, and then attempting to free the door using the

    force of multiple 20 pound sledgehammer strikes. The mill hatch door

    opening system uses a brace plate, a welded I-Beam, and a hydraulic

     jack. The I-Beam is connected to the mill by the brace plate; the jack

    is placed between the mill door and the I-Beam, and then activated to

    free the door.

    Ash Grove Texas LPMidlothian, Texas 

    Finish Mill Door Opener

    Another mill hatch door project uses a brace and a hydraulic jack

    designed and fabricated by employees at Ash Grove’s Seattle cement

    plant. To address the same types of injuries that occurred at its sister

    plant, employees in Seattle independently devised a mechanical system

    that reduced the need for employees to use a sledgehammer, thereby

    removing significant strain on the body. A brace was fabricated, and

    once in place, effectively removed the door in five minutes. This

    design used an 18-inch of I-beam with pad eyes attached to the brace

    to connect to the pad eyes on the mill. A 25-Ton hydraulic jack placed

    between the brace put pressure on the mill door to complete the job.

    Ash Grove Cement Company, Seattle Plant

    Seattle, Washington

    Mill Doors Made Easy 

    GCC Dakotah employed a different design to remove mill doors whennecessary. The principle was the same, though. A team of employees

    working in the maintenance department at GCC in Rapid City, South

    Dakota, fabricated an assembly that consisted of two mounting brack-

    ets that attach to the mill door frame. The team placed a reaction bar

    next to the door and used the tool as a pushing support for a 50-ton

    porta-power. Removing mill doors now is a matter of using two pins

    and a few strokes of a handle to open the door.

    GCC of America

    Rapid City, South Dakota

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    16/20

     Safety FollowsWisdom

    15

    Pyroprocessing

    Retrieving a Hot Sample 

    Employees at the CEMEX Brooksville South cement plant came up with

    an innovative way to isolate the retrieval of hot-process samples and

    better protect the samplers. Workers constructed a 4-sided metal build

    ing with a Plexiglas view window around the sampling port. A wench

    operated by a hand crank mechanism allows the sampler to raise and

    lower the retrieval device and to open and close the portal cap. By

    physically separating the sampler from the portal cap with a metal

    barrier, employees are never in an unsafe position.

    CEMEX

    Brooksville, Florida 

    Duct Plug 

    At the Holcim (US) Inc. cement plant in Midlothian, Texas, employees

    were building scaffolds inside a large vertical duct to replace old refrac-

    tory brick. After a piece broke away and struck an employee, the plant

    developed protective equipment to prevent falling materials from hitting

    people as they work inside ducts. The Duct Plug is made of a “tough

    material” which is flat until it is inflated using compressed air in a

    location above where employees are working. When the work is

    completed, the plug is deflated and easily moved. Because of itsflexibility, the duct plug can be installed in virtually any shaped duct.

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Midlothian, Texas 

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    17/20

    PCA SAFETY INNOVATION AWARDS 2010

    16

    Distribution

    Semi-Automatic Tarping System 

    Hourly and salaried employees at the Roanoke Cement Company’s

    Troutville cement plant identified a risk for drivers who climbed onto

    flat beds of a semi-truck to load pallets of cement. In-house engineers

    designed and implemented a semi-automatic tarping system that uses

    a hoist and motor control to lift a tarp onto the bed and cover the pallets

    for transport. The hoist mechanism eliminates the need for climbing.

    The semi-automatic truck tarping station significantly reduces risk by

    keeping employees on the ground while maintaining truck cycle times.

    Titan America LLC

    Troutville, Virginia 

    General Facility

    Having to replace valve tube springs on a portable welder engine

    prompted an employee at Ash Grove Cement Company’s Leamington,

    Utah, plant to design a tool that both removed a safety hazard and

    reduced the time to do the job. Compressing the valve springs manually

    exposed the employee to pinch hazards and line of fire hazards if the

    spring slips from the tool grip. He fashioned a new tool by welding two

    one-inch “U” brackets onto a pair of vice grips. Instead of compressing

    the parts by hand, the employee can use the modified vice grips to holdand compress the valve tube springs.

    Ash Grove Cement Company

    Leamington, Utah 

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    18/20

    Less than 5,000 Employee Hours

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

    St. Marys Cement Inc. (U.S.) / VCNA

    Toledo, Ohio 

    Essroc Cement Corp.

    Palmer, Massachusetts 

    5,000 to 9,000 Employee Hours

    Lehigh Cement Company

    Doraville, Georgia 

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Denver, Colorado 

    Holcim (US) Inc.

    Memphis, Tennessee 

    More than 9,000 Employee Hours

    Buzzi Unicem USA Inc.

    Nashville, Tennessee 

    Lehigh Cement Company

    Port Everglades, Florida 

    Titan America LLC

    Newark, New Jersey 

    Canadian Terminal Award

    Lafarge North America Inc.

    Whitefish River, Ontario 

    The Terminal Safety Award recognizes portland

    cement distribution terminals with the best safety

    records in North America. The performance records

    of more than 230 terminals in the U.S. and Canadawere reviewed for the contest this year, and we are

    awarding 10 terminals who posted the best accident

    performance records.

    For U.S. operations, three categories with 3 winners

    each achieved this prestigious award; while a separate

    category was established with one winner in Canada.

    The categories are U.S. terminals with less than 5,000

    employee hours; U.S. terminals between 5,000 and9,000 hours; and U.S. terminals with more than

    9,000 hours. Canadian terminals were evaluated

    on the entire range of employee hours.

    Employees at these facilities work to continuously

    improve safety and health conditions and set a high

    standard that promotes safety and health protections

    throughout the year.

    PCA TERMINAL SAFETY AWARDS 2010  Safety FollowsWisdom

    17

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    19/20

  • 8/18/2019 2010 Pca Ee Awards

    20/20