2010 california standards test (cst) results lodi unified school district prepared by the...

2010 California Standards 2010 California Standards Test (CST) ResultsTest (CST) Results

Lodi Unified School DistrictLodi Unified School District

Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study Session

ARE.1011.015 Release of 2010 CST ResultsARE.1011.015 Release of 2010 CST Results 22

Executive SummaryExecutive Summary For the third consecutive year…..For the third consecutive year…..

– There was an increase in the percent of There was an increase in the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in:students meeting or exceeding standards in:

English Language ArtsEnglish Language Arts MathematicsMathematics Grade Level ScienceGrade Level Science History-Social Science History-Social Science

– The percent of students meeting or exceeding The percent of students meeting or exceeding English Language Arts and Mathematics English Language Arts and Mathematics standards increased for each of these standards increased for each of these numerically significant student groups:numerically significant student groups:

Economically Disadvantaged studentsEconomically Disadvantaged students Asian studentsAsian students White studentsWhite students


Executive SummaryExecutive Summary From 2007 to 2010, there have been mixed From 2007 to 2010, there have been mixed

results regarding the district’s efforts in closing results regarding the district’s efforts in closing the ethnic achievement gaps in English the ethnic achievement gaps in English Language Arts and Mathematics.Language Arts and Mathematics.– English Language ArtsEnglish Language Arts

Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Language Arts Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and African American students, regardless of between White and African American students, regardless of economic status, has widened. economic status, has widened.

During this same period, the achievement gap in English During this same period, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and Hispanic or Latino students Language Arts between White and Hispanic or Latino students has narrowed for non-economically disadvantaged students and has narrowed for non-economically disadvantaged students and widened for economically disadvantaged students.widened for economically disadvantaged students.

– MathematicsMathematics Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between White Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between White

and African American students, regardless of economic status, and African American students, regardless of economic status, has widened.has widened.

During this same period, the achievement gap in mathematics During this same period, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and Hispanic or Latino students, regardless of between White and Hispanic or Latino students, regardless of economic status, has widened.economic status, has widened.


Executive Summary: Executive Summary: Focus Areas for 2010-11Focus Areas for 2010-11

Elementary EducationElementary Education

– English Language English Language ArtsArts

Grades 3 and 6Grades 3 and 6

– MathematicsMathematics Grades 2 and 3Grades 2 and 3

Secondary EducationSecondary Education

– English Language ArtsEnglish Language Arts Grade 11Grade 11

– MathematicsMathematics Algebra I and Algebra I and

GeometryGeometry

– ScienceScience PhysicsPhysics

– History-Social ScienceHistory-Social Science Grade 11Grade 11


CST Content Areas AssessedCST Content Areas Assessed

English Language Arts: English Language Arts: Grades 2-11 Grades 2-11

Mathematics: Mathematics: Grades 2-7, General Math, Grades 2-7, General Math, Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and Summative Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, and Summative High School MathHigh School Math

Science:Science: Grades 5, 8, and 10 Life Science, Earth Grades 5, 8, and 10 Life Science, Earth Science, Biology, Chemistry, and PhysicsScience, Biology, Chemistry, and Physics

History-Social Science:History-Social Science: Grade 8, and Grade 11 Grade 8, and Grade 11 U.S. History, World HistoryU.S. History, World History


Summary Findings – English Summary Findings – English Language ArtsLanguage Arts

Overall, 45% of our students met or exceeded grade level Overall, 45% of our students met or exceeded grade level English Language Arts standards.English Language Arts standards.– This represents a 2 percentage point increase from This represents a 2 percentage point increase from

2009, and a 9 percentage point increase since 2007.2009, and a 9 percentage point increase since 2007.

For the third consecutive year, the percent of students For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in English Language Arts meeting or exceeding standards in English Language Arts increased for four of the grade levels tested. increased for four of the grade levels tested. – Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase:

Grades 4, 7, 8, and 10Grades 4, 7, 8, and 10– Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade

22– One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5 and 9One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5 and 9– Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 3, 6, and Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 3, 6, and

1111


CST English Language Arts – CST English Language Arts – By GradeBy Grade

CST English Language Arts by Grade Percent Meeting Standards

36%

25%

42%

36%

37% 40

%

36%

45%

33%

31% 36

%

35%

29%

45%

42%

42% 44%

39% 46

%

37%

32% 39

%41%

35%

51%

42% 48

%

49%

42% 46

%

39%

35% 43

%

42%

30%

54%

48%

47% 51

%

47% 52

%

41%

35%

45%

0%10%20%30%

40%50%60%

Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade10

Grade11

Total

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – English Language Arts Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Other SubgroupBy Other Subgroup

From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting English Language Arts standards steadily meeting English Language Arts standards steadily increased for one of the three other subgroups.increased for one of the three other subgroups.

CST English Language Arts by Other SubgroupsPercent Meeting Standards

13%

25%

11%

36%

14%

29%

13%

39%

17%

32%

16%

43%

15%

37%

14%

45%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

English Learner EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Students withDisabilities

Total

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – English Language Arts Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Ethnic SubgroupBy Ethnic Subgroup

From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting English Language Arts standards has meeting English Language Arts standards has steadily increased for six of our ethnic subgroups.steadily increased for six of our ethnic subgroups.

CST English Language Arts by Ethnic Subgroup Percent Meeting Standards

24%

45%

36% 50

%

26%

31% 51

%

36%

27% 45

%

41% 53

%

29% 37

% 53%

39%

31% 51

%

45% 56

%

33% 43

% 57%

43%

32% 47

%

47% 59

%

35% 45

% 58%

45%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

Afr

ican

Am

eric

an

Am

erIn

dian

/Ala

skan

Nat

ive Asi

an

Filip

ino

His

pani

c or

Latin

o

Pac

ific

Isla

nder

Whi

te

Tot

al

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – English Language Arts Summary Findings – English Language Arts By Economic Status By Ethnic SubgroupBy Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup

Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Since 2007, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and African Language Arts between White and African American students, regardless of economic American students, regardless of economic status, has widened. status, has widened.

During this same period, the achievement gap in During this same period, the achievement gap in English Language Arts between White and English Language Arts between White and Hispanic or Latino students has:Hispanic or Latino students has:– narrowed by 4 percentage points for non-narrowed by 4 percentage points for non-

economically disadvantaged students; and economically disadvantaged students; and – widened by 3 percentage points for widened by 3 percentage points for

economically disadvantaged students.economically disadvantaged students.


CST English Language ArtsCST English Language ArtsBy Economic Status By Ethnic SubgroupBy Economic Status By Ethnic Subgroup

CST English Language Arts by Economic Status by Ethnic Subgroup Percent Meeting Standards

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Afr

ica

nA

me

rica

n

Am

eri

can

Ind

ian

/Ala

ska

nN

ativ

e Asi

an

Fili

pin

o

His

pa

nic

or

La

tino

Pa

cific

Isla

nd

er

Wh

ite

Afr

ica

nA

me

rica

n

Am

eri

can

Ind

ian

/Ala

ska

nN

ativ

e Asi

an

Fili

pin

o

His

pa

nic

or

La

tino

Pa

cific

Isla

nd

er

Wh

ite

Non-Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – Grade Level Summary Findings – Grade Level MathematicsMathematics

Overall, 51% of our students met or exceeded grade level Overall, 51% of our students met or exceeded grade level mathematics standards.mathematics standards.– This represents a 1 percentage point increase from 2009, and This represents a 1 percentage point increase from 2009, and

a 6 percentage point increase since 2007.a 6 percentage point increase since 2007.

For the third consecutive year, the percent of students For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level meeting or exceeding standards in grade level mathematics increased for two of the grade levels tested. mathematics increased for two of the grade levels tested. – Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grades 4 Three-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grades 4

and 6and 6– Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade 7Two-year consecutive percent proficient increase: Grade 7– One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5One-year percent proficient increase: Grades 5– Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 2 and 3Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grades 2 and 3


Summary Findings – Grade Level Summary Findings – Grade Level MathematicsMathematics

CST Grade Level Mathematics by GradePercent Meeting Standards

53%

53%

47%

40%

40%

35%

45%

54%

55%

53%

45%

41%

29%

46%55

% 58%

57%

45%

46%

36%

50%

50% 54

% 61%

49%

48%

42% 51

%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Total*

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – End-of-Summary Findings – End-of-Course MathematicsCourse Mathematics

Overall, 24% of our students met or exceeded Overall, 24% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course mathematics standards.end-of-course mathematics standards.– This represents a 1 percentage point increase from This represents a 1 percentage point increase from


From 2009 to 2010, the percent of students From 2009 to 2010, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in end-of-course meeting or exceeding standards in end-of-course mathematics increased for two of the subjects mathematics increased for two of the subjects tested. tested. – Percent proficient increase: Algebra II and Summative Percent proficient increase: Algebra II and Summative

High School Math High School Math – Percent percent proficient no change/decrease: General Percent percent proficient no change/decrease: General

Math, Algebra I, and GeometryMath, Algebra I, and Geometry


Summary Findings – End-of-Summary Findings – End-of-Course MathematicsCourse Mathematics

CST End-of-Course MathPercent Meeting Standards

6%

17% 30

% 37%

52%

22%

4%

20% 27

% 32%

46%

23%

6%

22%

23% 32

%

48%

23%

5%

21%

21%

35%

59%

24%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

General Math Algebra I Geometry Algebra II SummativeHigh School

Math

Total*

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – End-of-Course Summary Findings – End-of-Course Mathematics - Algebra I By GradeMathematics - Algebra I By Grade

CST Algebra I Math by GradePercent Meeting Standards

81%

20%

15%

13%

6%

17%

67%

20% 22%

10%

5%

20%

68%

22%

22%

10%

5%

22%

70%

22%

22%

8% 3%

21%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Total

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – CST Summary Findings – CST Mathematics By Other SubgroupMathematics By Other Subgroup

For the third consecutive year, the percent For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting mathematics standards of students meeting mathematics standards increased for one of the 3 other subgroups: increased for one of the 3 other subgroups:

CST Mathematics by Other SubgroupPercent Meeting Standards

24% 29%

17%

36%

25% 31%

18%

38%

27% 33%

21%

39%

25%

35%

17%

40%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

English Learner EconomicallyDisadvantaged

Students withDisabilities

Total

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – CST Summary Findings – CST Mathematics By Ethnic SubgroupMathematics By Ethnic Subgroup

From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students From 2007 to 2010, the percent of students meeting mathematics standards has steadily meeting mathematics standards has steadily increased for five of our ethnic subgroups.increased for five of our ethnic subgroups.

CST Mathematics by Ethnic SubgroupPercent Meeting Standards

23% 3

7%

39% 4

9%

29%

33% 4

5%

36%

24%

40%

42% 48%

31%

35% 4

6%

38%

25% 3

9%

44% 50%

33% 39% 47%

39%

24%

44%

46% 53%

33%

36% 4

9%

40%

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%

Afr

ican

Am

erican

Am

er

India

n/A

laskan

Nativ

e Asia

n

Filipin

o

His

panic

or

Latin

o

Pacifi

c Isla

nder

White

Tota

l

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – CST Mathematics Summary Findings – CST Mathematics Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic

SubgroupSubgroup Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between Since 2007, the achievement gap in mathematics between

White and African American students has:White and African American students has:– widened by 3 percentage points for non-economically widened by 3 percentage points for non-economically

disadvantaged students; and disadvantaged students; and – widened by 5 percentage points for economically widened by 5 percentage points for economically

disadvantaged students.disadvantaged students.

During this same period, the achievement gap in During this same period, the achievement gap in mathematics between White and Hispanic or Latino mathematics between White and Hispanic or Latino students has:students has:– widened by 1 percentage points for non-economically widened by 1 percentage points for non-economically

disadvantaged students; and disadvantaged students; and – widened by 2 percentage points for economically widened by 2 percentage points for economically

disadvantaged students.disadvantaged students.


Summary Findings: CST Mathematics Summary Findings: CST Mathematics Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic Achievement By Economic Status By Ethnic

SubgroupSubgroupCST Mathematics by Economic Status by Ethnic Subgroup

Percent Meeting Standards

28% 35

%

50% 54

%

35%

36%

49%

20%

35%

35% 38

%

27%

28% 33

%

33% 39

%

54%

52%

38% 44

% 51%

21%

39%

38%

41%

28%

26% 35

%

28%

39%

57%

53%

40% 49

%

52%

24%

39%

39% 43

%

31%

29% 36

%

30%

46%

62%

58%

39%

42%

54%

22%

43%

42% 46

%

32%

32% 40

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Afri

can

Am

eric

an

Am

eric

anIn

dian

/Ala

skan

Nat

ive A

sian

Filip

ino

His

pani

c or

Latin

o

Pac

ific

Isla

nder

Whi

te

Afri

can

Am

eric

an

Am

eric

anIn

dian

/Ala

skan

Nat

ive A

sian

Filip

ino

His

pani

c or

Latin

o

Pac

ific

Isla

nder

Whi

te

Non-Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged

2007 (DD) 2008 (DD) 2009 (DD) 2010 (DD)


Summary Findings – Grade Summary Findings – Grade Level ScienceLevel Science

Overall, 48% of our students met or exceeded Overall, 48% of our students met or exceeded grade level science standards.grade level science standards.– This represents a 5 percentage point increase from This represents a 5 percentage point increase from


For the third consecutive year, the percent of For the third consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level science increased for two of the grade grade level science increased for two of the grade levels tested. levels tested. – Three-year percent proficient increase: Grades 8 and 10 Three-year percent proficient increase: Grades 8 and 10 – One-year percent proficient increase: Grade 5 One-year percent proficient increase: Grade 5


Summary Findings – Grade Level Summary Findings – Grade Level ScienceScience

CST Grade Level Science by GradePercent Meeting Standards

33%

34%

34%

34%

42% 45

%

38% 42

%

40%

51%

39% 43

%

51%

52%

41% 48

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 10 Total

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – End-of-Summary Findings – End-of-Course ScienceCourse Science

Overall, 38% of our students met or exceeded Overall, 38% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course science standards.end-of-course science standards.– This represents a 5 percentage point increase from This represents a 5 percentage point increase from


For the second consecutive year, the percent of For the second consecutive year, the percent of students meeting or exceeding standards in end-students meeting or exceeding standards in end-of-course science increased for one of the of-course science increased for one of the subjects tested. subjects tested. – Two-year percent proficient increase: Chemistry Two-year percent proficient increase: Chemistry – One-year percent proficient increase: Biology and Earth One-year percent proficient increase: Biology and Earth

Science Science – Percent proficient no change/decrease: PhysicsPercent proficient no change/decrease: Physics


Summary Findings – End-of-Summary Findings – End-of-Course ScienceCourse Science

CST End-of-Course Science Percent Meeting Standards

33% 37

%

27%

50%

32%

40%

33%

28%

57%

35%

36%

36%

27%

47%

33%

41%

39%

34%

44%

38%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Biology Chemistry Earth Science Physics Total

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – Grade Level Summary Findings – Grade Level History-Social ScienceHistory-Social Science

Overall, 40% of our students met or exceeded Overall, 40% of our students met or exceeded grade level history-social science standards.grade level history-social science standards.– This represents a 1 percentage point increase from This represents a 1 percentage point increase from

2009, and a 10 percentage point increase since 2007.2009, and a 10 percentage point increase since 2007. For the third consecutive year, the percent of For the third consecutive year, the percent of

students meeting or exceeding standards in students meeting or exceeding standards in grade level history-social science increased for grade level history-social science increased for one of the subjects tested. one of the subjects tested. – Three-year percent proficient increase: Grade 8 Three-year percent proficient increase: Grade 8 – Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grade 11Percent proficient no change/decrease: Grade 11


Summary Findings – Grade Level Summary Findings – Grade Level History-Social ScienceHistory-Social Science

CST Grade Level History-Social Science by Grade Percent Meeting Standards

30%

31%

30%33

%

33%

33%39

%

40%

39%43

%

38% 40

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

Grade 8 Grade 11 Total*

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Summary Findings – End-of-Summary Findings – End-of-Course History-Social ScienceCourse History-Social Science

Overall, 32% of our students met or exceeded Overall, 32% of our students met or exceeded end-of-course World History standards.end-of-course World History standards.– This represents a 2 percentage point increase from 2009, This represents a 2 percentage point increase from 2009,

and an 8 percentage point increase since 2007.and an 8 percentage point increase since 2007.

CST World History Percent Meeting Standards

24%28% 30% 32%

0%5%

10%15%20%25%30%35%

Total

2007 (CDE) 2008 (CDE) 2009 (CDE) 2010 (CDE)


Accountability TimelineAccountability Timeline August 18, CST Results releasedAugust 18, CST Results released

August 25, Pre-release of Accountability August 25, Pre-release of Accountability Progress Report (APR):Progress Report (APR):– Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – Academic Performance Index (API)Academic Performance Index (API)

August 31, Public release of APRAugust 31, Public release of APR

September 21, APR Update Report September 21, APR Update Report presented to the LUSD Board of Educationpresented to the LUSD Board of Education

2010 california standards test (cst) results lodi unified school district prepared by the...

Documents

cst english language

percent of students

mathematics grades

grade slide

latino students

mathematics standards

mathematics algebra

african american students