[A] Publications & Dates:

[001] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen fights McBride in Concourt[002] 10-09-29: SAPA-N24: Court to hear McBride ruling appeal[003] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen takes McBride appeal to Concourt[004] 10-09-30: SAPA-Business Report: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’[005] 20-09-30: SAPA-IOL: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[006] 10-09-30: SAPA-Pretoria News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [007] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Argus: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[008] 10-09-30: SAPA-SA Star: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[009] 10-09-30: SAPA-Sunday Ind.: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer [010] 10-09-30: SAPA-Daily News: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[011] 10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Times: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[012] 10-09-30: SAPA-Mercury: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer[013] 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’[014] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: McBride murder accusation unfair[015] 10-10-03: SAPA-Daily Dispatch: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’[016] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest[017] 10-09-30: SAPA-N24: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest[018] 10-10-01: SAPA-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past[019] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live: Citizen argues validity of TRC past[020] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Times: Court weighs validity of TRC past[021] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Argus: Court weighs validity of TRC past[022] 10-10-01: SAPA-Pretoria news: Court weighs validity of TRC past[023] 10-10-01: SAPA-The Mercury: Court weighs validity of TRC past[024] 10-10-01: SAPA-Sunday Tribune: Court weighs validity of TRC past[025] 10-10-01: SAPA-SA Star: Court weighs validity of TRC past[026] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Mobile: McBride Concourt case continues[027] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Newswatch: McBride Concourt case continues[028] 10-10-01: Citizen: Concourt: truth versus law[029] 10-10-01: Mail & Guardian: ‘If I see someone stealing, can I call him a thief?’[030] 10-10-01: Eyewitness News: McBride lawyer are playing with semantics [031] 10-09-30: TimesLive: When is a Killer not a Killer?[032] 10-10-01: Business Day: Court reserves McBride judgment[033] 10-10-05: Daily Maverick: Analysis: Citizen vs McBride, to remember or not to remember[034] 10-09-30: SAPA-City Press: McBride murderer accusation ‘unfair’[035] 10-09-30: SAPA-SunInd-IOL: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest1.

[C] Overview of Radical Honesty White Refugee Argument

1. Eight parties submitted arguments to the Concourt: Six Amici, Applicant and Respondent.The Radical Honesty argument has been censored from all CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument is an intentional, maliciouscampaign of censorship of: [72] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-332] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [512] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-792] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Afrikaner Demographic Survival; [86-982] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

1 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)2 Paragraph [**] of Radical Honesty (First) Amicus Curiae to Concourt in The Citizen v. Robert McBride (CCT 23-10)

[A] Publication & Date:

[001] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live3: Citizen fights McBride in Concourt

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest4.

[C] Overview of Radical Honesty White Refugee Argument

3. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R. McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

4. SAPA/SundayTimes/TimesLive/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On evening of 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#1885] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM[#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship

c. On 15 August at 12:396, 14:077, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:178, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

5. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

3 http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article682703.ece/Citizen-fights-McBride-in-ConCourt4 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)5 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]6 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=127 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=128 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[002] 10-09-29: SAPA-N249: Court to hear McBride ruling appeal

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest10.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/News24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On evening of 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18811] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport): Req [Publication] Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3912, 14:0713, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1714, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

9 http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Court-to-hear-McBride-ruling-appeal-2010092910 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)11 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]12 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1213 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1214 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[003] 10-09-29: SAPA-Times Live15: Citizen takes McBride appeal to Concourt

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest16.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18817] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship

c. On 15 August at 12:3918, 14:0719, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1720, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious, to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

15 http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article682446.ece/Citizen-takes-McBride-appeal-to-Concourt16 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)17 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]18 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1219 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1220 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[004] 10-09-30: SAPA-Business Report21: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest22.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/BusinessReport/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18823] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3924, 14:0725, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1726, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

21 http://www.busrep.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=566&fArticleId=566889522 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)23 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]24 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1225 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1226 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[005] 20-09-30: SAPA-IOL27: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest28.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/IOL/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18829] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Cape Argus: Chris Whitfield, [248] Ind. On Saturday: Peter Bruce, [252] Cape Times: Alide Dasnois.

c. On 15 August at 12:3930, 14:0731, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1732, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

27 http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/mcbride-murderer-label-unfair-lawyer-1.68268028 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)29 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]30 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1231 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1232 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[006]10-09-30: SAPA-Pretoria News33: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest34.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Pretoria News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18835] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 [249] Att: Ms. Z. Mkhuma, Editor; Req: Pretoria News Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3936, 14:0737, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1738, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

33 http://www.pretorianews.co.za/?fSectionId=3534&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews34 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)35 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]36 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1237 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1238 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[007]10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Argus39: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest40.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Cape Argus/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18841] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM: [247] Att: … Mr. C. Whitfield, Req: …. Argus Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3942, 14:0743, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1744, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

39 http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSectionId=3571&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews40 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)41 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]42 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1243 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1244 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[008]10-09-30: SAPA-SA Star45: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest46.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/SA Star/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18847] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#246] Att: Mr. Brendan Seery, Editor; Req … Star's Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3948, 14:0749, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1750, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

45 http://www.thestar.co.za/?fSectionId=3268&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews46 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)47 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]48 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1249 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1250 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[009]10-09-30: SAPA-Sunday Ind.51: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest52.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Sunday Independent/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18853] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:03 [245] Att: Editor: Mr. Makhudu Sefara; Req. Sunday Ind. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3954, 14:0755, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1756, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

51 http://www.sundayindependent.co.za/?fSectionId=3536&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews52 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)53 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]54 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1255 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1256 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[010] 10-09-30: SAPA-Daily News57: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest58.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Daily News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18859] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 [#251] Att: Daily News: Ed: Mr. Alan Dunn; Req: Daily News Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3960, 14:0761, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1762, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

57 http://www.dailynews.co.za/?fSectionId=3532&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews58 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)59 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]60 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1261 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1262 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[011]10-09-30: SAPA-Cape Times63: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest64.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Cape Times/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18865] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [252] Att: Ms. Alide Dasnois; Req: Cape Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3966, 14:0767, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1768, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

63 http://www.capetimes.co.za/?fSectionId=3531&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews64 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)65 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]66 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1267 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1268 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[012]10-09-30: SAPA-Mercury69: McBride ‘murderer’ label unfair: lawyer

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest70.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/The Mercury/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18871] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3972, 14:0773, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1774, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

69 http://www.themercury.co.za/?fSectionId=3535&fArticleId=1.682680&fFeed=sanews70 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)71 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]72 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1273 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1274 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[013] 10-09-30: SAPA-N2475: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest76.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/News 24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18877] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport).

c. On 15 August at 12:3978, 14:0779, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1780, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

e. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic

75 http://www.news24.com/printArticle.aspx?iframe&aid=88774e42-3cd1-4832-817b-053045239bb1&cid=105976 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)77 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]78 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1279 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1280 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

[A] Publication & Date:

[014] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live81: McBride murder accusation unfair

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest82.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18883] Questions for SANEF Chairperson:Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley,.. Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3984, 14:0785, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1786, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

81 http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article683813.ece/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair82 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)83 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]84 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1285 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1286 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[015] 10-10-03: SAPA-Daily Dispatch87: McBride murder accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest88.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Daily Dispatch/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18889] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 03:59 PM [#203] Att: Daily Dispatch: Ed. Mr. Andrew Trench; Req: Daily Dispatch Position on media corruption and media censorship

c. On 15 August at 12:3990, 14:0791, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1792, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

87 http://www.dispatch.co.za/article.aspx?id=43760288 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)89 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]90 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1291 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1292 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[016] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live93: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest94.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#18895] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:3996, 14:0797, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:1798, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

93 http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article684101.ece/Skeletons-can-be-raised-in-public-interest94 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)95 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]96 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=1297 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=1298 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[017] 10-09-30: SAPA-N2499: ‘Skeletons’ can be raised in public interest

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest100.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/News 24/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188101] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 01:53 [# 192] Tim du Plessis (Beeld), 05:30 [#217] Bun Booysen (Die Burger), [#233] Lisa Albrecht (Rapport): Req [Publication] Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39102, 14:07103, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17104, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

99 http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Skeletons-can-be-raised-in-public-interest-20100930100 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)101 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]102 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12103 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12104 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[018] 10-10-01: SAPA-IOL (Kenrichi Serino)105: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest106.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/IOL/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188107] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Cape Argus: Chris Whitfield, [248] Ind. On Saturday: Peter Bruce, [252] Cape Times: Alide Dasnois.

c. On 15 August at 12:39108, 14:07109, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17110, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

105 http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/court-weighs-validity-of-trc-past-1.682742106 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)107 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]108 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12109 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12110 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[019] 10-09-30: SAPA-Times Live111: Citizen argues validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest112.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/TimesLive/SundayTimes/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188113] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39114, 14:07115, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17116, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

111 http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/article684314.ece/Citizen-argues-validity-of-TRC-past112 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)113 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]114 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12115 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12116 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[020] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Times117: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest118.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Cape Times/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188119] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM {#252] Att: Cape Times Ed: Ms. Alide Dasnois; Req: Cape Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39120, 14:07121, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17122, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

117 http://www.capetimes.co.za/?fSectionId=3531&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews118 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)119 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]120 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12121 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12122 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[021] 10-10-01: SAPA-Cape Argus123: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest124.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Cape Argus/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188125] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#247] Att: Cape Argus Editor: Mr. C. Whitfield, Req: Cape & Weekend Argus Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39126, 14:07127, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17128, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

123 http://www.capeargus.co.za/?fSectionId=3571&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews124 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)125 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]126 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12127 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12128 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[022] 10-10-01: SAPA-Pretoria news129: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest130.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Pretoria News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188131] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 {#249] Att: Ms. Z. Mkhuma, Editor; Req: Pretoria News Positionon media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39132, 14:07133, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17134, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

129 http://www.pretorianews.co.za/?fSectionId=3534&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews130 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)131 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]132 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12133 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12134 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[023] 10-10-01: SAPA-The Mercury135: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest136.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/The Mercury/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188137] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39138, 14:07139, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17140, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

135 http://www.themercury.co.za/?fSectionId=3535&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews136 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)137 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]138 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12139 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12140 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[024] 10-10-01: SAPA-Sunday Tribune141: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest142.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Sunday Tribune/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188143] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:21 AM [#250] Att: Mr. Philani Mgwaba, Editor, Req. Sunday Tribune Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39144, 14:07145, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17146, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

141 http://www.sundaytribune.co.za/?fSectionId=3537&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews142 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)143 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]144 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12145 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12146 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[025] 10-10-01: SAPA-SA Star147: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest148.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/The Star/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188149] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:22 AM [#246] Att: Mr. Brendan Seery, Editor; Req … Star's Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39150, 14:07151, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17152, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

147 http://www.thestar.co.za/?fSectionId=3268&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews148 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)149 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]150 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12151 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12152 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[026] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Mobile153: McBride Concourt case continues

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest154.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Eastern Cape Radio/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188155] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39156, 14:07157, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17158, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

153 http://www.ecr.co.za/kagiso/content/en/east-coast-radio/east-coast-radio-mobile-news?oid=932049&sn=Mobile+news+detail&pid=171901154 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)155 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]156 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12157 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12158 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[027] 10-10-01: SAPA-ECR-Newswatch159: McBride Concourt case continues

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest160.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Eastern Cape Radio/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188161] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39162, 14:07163, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17164, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

159 http://www.ecr.co.za/kagiso/content/en/east-coast-radio/east-coast-radio-news?oid=932049&sn=Detail&pid=490476&McBride-Concourt-case-continues160 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)161 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]162 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12163 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12164 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[028] 10-10-01: Citizen165: Concourt: truth versus law

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest166.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Citizen/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via Citizen attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188167] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39168, 14:07169, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17170, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via Citizen attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

165 http://www.thecitizen.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=128517&catid=80:breaking-news&Itemid=132166 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)167 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]168 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12169 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12170 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[029] 10-10-01: Mail & Guardian (Faranaaz Parker)171: ‘If I see someone stealing, can I call him a thief?’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest172.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Mail and Guardian/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188173] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 06:36 PM: [#227] Att: Mail and Guardian Editors; Req: Mail and Guardian Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39174, 14:07175, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17176, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

171 http://www.mg.co.za/article/2010-10-01-if-i-see-someone-stealing-can-call-him-a-thief172 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)173 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]174 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12175 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12176 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[030] 10-10-01: Eyewitness News177: Stephen Grootes: McBride lawyer are playing with semantics

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest178.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Eyewitness News/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188179] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 06:50 PM: [#229] Att: Ms. Pheladi Gwangwa, Station Manager; Req: 702 Radio Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39180, 14:07181, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17182, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

177 http://www.eyewitnessnews.co.za/articleprog.aspx?id=49757178 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)179 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]180 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12181 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12182 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[031] 10-09-30: TimesLive183: Khethme Chelemu: When is a Killer not a Killer?

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest184.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Sunday Times/TimesLive/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188185] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 08:59 PM [#238]: Att: Mr. Ray Hartley, Editor, Req. Sunday Times Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39186, 14:07187, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17188, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

183 http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair-20100930-2184 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)185 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]186 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12187 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12188 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[032] 10-10-01: Business Day189: Ernest Mabuza: Court reserves McBride judgment

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest190.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Business Day/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188191] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 02:45 PM: {#202] Att: Mr. Peter Bruce, Editor: Bus Day: Req Bus. Day Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39192, 14:07193, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17194, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

189 http://www.businessday.co.za/Articles/Content.aspx?id=122504190 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)191 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]192 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12193 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12194 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[033] 10-10-05: Daily Maverick195: Stephen Grootes: Analysis: Citizen vs McBride, to remember or not to remember

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest196.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. Business Day/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188197] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 04:22 PM [#208] Att: Daily Maverick: Ed: Mr. Brkic Branko; Req: Daily Maverick's Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39198, 14:07199, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17200, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

195 http://www.thedailymaverick.co.za/article/2010-10-04-analysis-citizen-vs-mcbride-to-remember-or-not-to-remember196 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)197 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]198 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12199 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12200 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[034] 10-09-30: SAPA-City Press201: McBride murderer accusation ‘unfair’

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest202.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/City Press/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188203] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 03:42 PM [#202] Att: City Press Ed: Ms. Ferial Haffajee; Req: City Press Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39204, 14:07205, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17206, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

201 http://www.citypress.co.za/SouthAfrica/News/McBride-murder-accusation-unfair-20100930-2202 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)203 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]204 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12205 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12206 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12

[A] Publication & Date:

[035] 10-09-30: SAPA-SunInd-IOL207: Court weighs validity of TRC past

[B] Nature of Complaint: Violations of Press Codes: 1.1 & 1.2.2

1.1: Inaccurate & unfair by omission; 1.2: Not in context, unbalanced, departed from facts by (2) intentional material omissions of Radical Honesty argument in public interest208.

[C] Overview of Argument

1. Eight parties submitted written and/or verbal arguments to the court: Six Amici: [1]Lara Johnstone, Radical Honesty SA; [2] Freedom of Expression Institute; [3] SA National Editors Forum; [4] Joyce Sibanyoni Mbizana; [5] Mbasa Mxenge; [6] Dept. of Justice and Constitutional Development; [Applicant] The Citizen, [Respondent] R.McBride. The Radical Honesty argument has consistently been censored from CCT 23-10 news reports.

2. SAPA/Sunday Independent/SANEF editors notified of the Radical Honesty Argument:

a. Via SANEF attorneys on Mon 7/19/2010 3:28 AM, in CCT: 23-10: First Amicus: Amended Heads of Argument and Practice Note, incl. Condonation Applic.

b. On 26 July 2010 at (i) (via) 12:33 PM [#188209] Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Rantao: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (ii) (via) 01:09 PM [#190] FW: Questions for SANEF Chairperson: Mr. Makhanya: Re: Ind. Media Tribunal, media corruption and media censorship; (iii) 07:35 PM [#234] Att: Mr. van der Velden, Editor; Req. SA Press. Assoc. Position on media corruption and media censorship; (iv) 12:03 [245] Att: Editor: Mr. Makhudu Sefara; Req. Sunday Ind. Position on media corruption and media censorship.

c. On 15 August at 12:39210, 14:07211, 15:25, 15:48, and 16:10; and on 16 August at 10:28 and 12:17212, in a Press Release published on SAPA’s Domestic and International Wire Services: Radical Honesty SA Amicus, in Concourt # 23-10: CONCOURT: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE INTERPRETATION OF TRC ACT

d. Via SANEF attorneys on Wed 8/25/2010 2:31 PM, in RH Transparency: FYI: Complaint to Green Scorpions/SAPS/PCLU (CAS 823-08-2010) directly related to CCT 23-10

3. It is alleged that the Omission of Radical Honesty argument was intentional & malicious; to censor First Amicus criticism of media, and TRC Population Policy Common Sense Fraud related arguments to Concourt, from SA Public. For example such as argument/evidence in paragraphs: [7] ‘If It Bleads, It Leads’ Media Parasite complicity to Political Violence; [26-33] Dr. Blanton: How sincere v. fake forgiveness affects ‘reasonable reader’; [51] Dr. Maher: How and Why Journalists Avoid Population-Environment Connection Study; [52-79] TRC’s ‘Crime of Apartheid’ Falsification of History, because Apartheid was a Just War for Demographic Survival; [86-98] 40 SA Media Editors Endorse Legal and Political Persecution (Denial of Freedom of Speech) of RH White Refugee.

207 http://www.sundayindependent.co.za/?fSectionId=3536&fArticleId=1.682742&fFeed=sanews208 Johan Retief, Media Ethics (2002: 160); Helge Ronning & Francis P Kasoma, Media Ethics (2002: 71)209 First Amicus Proof of Email Service and Correspondence # 2 [ www.docstoc.com/docs/53657095/ ]210 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9305&Itemid=12211 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9306&Itemid=12212 http://www.link2media.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9316&Itemid=12