1 feedback control of a micro manipulator alarm lab
TRANSCRIPT
1
FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A FEEDBACK CONTROL OF A
MICRO MANIPULATORMICRO MANIPULATOR
ALARM LABALARM LAB
2
ALARM LABALARM LAB
On 3 stages:
Total displacement = 25mm (coarse / micrometer) 300300m (fine / PZT)m (fine / PZT)
Resolution = 100nm100nm (Joystick)
knob
Z
yx
3
ALARM LABALARM LAB
PZT flexurePipette (8m diameter)
4
Application of the micro-manipulator
Micro-injection (ICSI )Micro-injection (ICSI ) Micro-dissectionMicro-dissection
Zona penetration
Zona
Taking out the dissected membrane
Zona Penetration
Sperm injection
Capturing the X chromosome
Dissecting
Taking the dissected part out
Storing the dissected chromosome
ALARM LABALARM LAB
5
MOTIVATION
• Motion Control of the tip
100nm is not enough for many sub-micron biological applications
• Dynamic Modeling
The uncertainties are causing very low success rates in biological applications
ALARM LABALARM LAB
6
ALARM LABALARM LAB
PiezzoDrill control
Manipulator control
Current
Feedback
CURRENT SETUPCURRENT SETUP
7
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Control card
ROBUST CONTROLLOGIC F
eedb
ack
Control signal
8
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Present work
• Analyical model of the manipulator (excluding the pipette).
• Experimental set-up and tests on the same .
• Comparison of the experimental and analytical results.
• Experiments (including the pipette) with Hg in the pipette and without.
9
Dynamic model
M2
X2
M1
X1
F
Spring (Ki)
Damper (Ci)
PZT force (F)
Equivalent mass (Mi)
F
M3
X3
Input : F; measured output X3
ALARM LABALARM LAB
10
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Time (sec)
Dis
plac
emen
t (u
m)
X3 displacement comparison (the experiments vs. dynamic model)
ALARM LABALARM LAB
11
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
x 104
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
Frequency (Hz)
Dis
plac
emen
t(um
)FFT comparison (the experiments vs. dynamic model)
ALARM LABALARM LAB
12
TipPhotonic probePhotonic probe
Nano level displacement measurement setup
ALARM LABALARM LAB
13
Working principle of photonic probe
Light source
Ou
tpu
t (V
)
Distance (m)
Probe to target
distance
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Resolution = 2.5nmResolution = 2.5nm
14
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Experimental procedure
Photonic sensorGap
Read out (V)
5 10 15 20 25 300
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Vol
tage
Time
15
ALARM LABALARM LAB
0 1 2 3 4 5 6-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
Time (sec)
Dis
plac
emen
t (nm
)Joystick control
16
Setup for ICSI experiment without Mercurywithout Mercury
Vol
tage
Time
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Read out (V)
Pipette dia. < 8
17
ALARM LABALARM LAB
Setup for ICSI experiment with Mercurywith Mercury
Vol
tage
Time
MercuryMercuryMercuryMercuryMercuryMercuryMercury
Read out (V)
18
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01 0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02
-0.25
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Time (sec)
X3 D
ispl
acem
ent (
um) without mercury
with mercury
X3 displacement comparison
ALARM LABALARM LAB
19
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
x 104
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
Frequency (Hz)
Dis
plac
emen
t (um
)
without mercury
with mercury
FFT comparison
ALARM LABALARM LAB
20
Observations
• The key is at the micro-dynamics of the pipette tip.• The pipette holder does not feel the presence of Hg. • Robust control is possible at 10nm of resolution
Obstacles
• Extreme flexibility at the tip (glass acts like fiber). • Displacement sensing (in 2-D) at the pipette tip• Complex visco-elastic interface between the Hg and
the pipette.
ALARM LABALARM LAB