1 facets of professional development: one size does not fit all nadine bezuk and steve klass cmc-n...

31
1 Facets of Professional Development: One Size Does Not Fit All Nadine Bezuk and Steve Klass CMC-N 2005--CAMTE Strand

Post on 20-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Facets of Professional Development:

One Size Does Not Fit All

Nadine Bezuk and Steve KlassCMC-N 2005--CAMTE Strand

2

Today’s SessionWelcome and introductionsWhat we know about professional

developmentWhat we do in our professional

development Impact of our workQuestions/discussion

3

Characteristics of Expert Teachers Know the structure of the knowledge in their

disciplines; Know the conceptual barriers that are likely to

hinder learning; Have a well-organized content knowledge

and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK); and

Continuously assess their own learning, knowledge, and practices.(Bransford, Brown, and Cocking, 1999, p. 230)

4

Effective Professional Development Is driven by a well-defined image of

effective classroom learning and teaching; Provides opportunities for teachers to

build their content and PCK and examine practice;

Is research-based and engages teachers as adult learners in the learning approaches they will use with their students; (continued)

5

Effective Professional Development (continued) Provides opportunities for teachers to

collaborate with colleagues and others to improve their practice;

Supports teachers to serve in leadership roles;

Links with other parts of the education system; and

Is designed based on student learning data and is continuously evaluated and improved.– Loucks-Horsley et al. (2003), p. 44

6

Our Belief System Good professional development blends

content and pedagogy.– Teachers with this understanding can teach

effectively from any curriculum materials. Good professional development is led by

people with K-12 teaching experience and expertise in mathematics and/or mathematics education.

All students can learn mathematics. Assessment should be used to inform

instruction.– Use student thinking to make instructional

decisions.

7

SDSU Professional DevelopmentSupported by a $5.1M grant from

Qualcomm to Improve Student Achievement in Mathematics (ISAM).

This is the sixth year of our work.We offer:

– University certificates and coursework– District partnerships– Professional development

8

Characteristics of Our Professional Development

Accountable for teacher growth and increased student achievement

Blends content and pedagogyLinks to classroom practiceEmbeds equitySustained over time

9

Unique Facets of Our Work

University certificate programsDistrict partnerships, including

district-based professional development

10

University Certificate Programs

Mathematics Specialist Certificate Program (upper elementary)

Primary Mathematics Specialist Certificate Program– 12 units of coursework

• 6 units of Mathematics coursework• 6 units of Teacher Education coursework

We’re thinking about certificates for middle school and high school

11

University Certificate Programs

SDSU (not CTC) certificate Shows that teachers have special

expertise in teaching mathematics Some districts reward recipients with

stipends or salary credit Includes 6 units of graduate credit University ceremony is a morale

booster

12

District Partnerships

What are the district’s needs related to mathematics?

Collaboratively plan:– Delivery model– Teacher participation– Starting options

13

District Needs

Improve student achievement (as measured by CST, CAHSEE)

Improve student success in algebra Increase student participation in

higher-level mathematics courses Increase teacher effectiveness Help teachers meet NCLB

requirements

14

Teacher Participation

Voluntary or mandatorySpecific grade ranges (e.g., grades

4 - 6) or specific content (e.g., algebra)

Working in a district with an intact group of teachers or a mixed group from several schools/districts

15

A Variety of Delivery Models

One year, two years, more After school (4.5 hours (with dinner) or

3 hours) Release days with sub coverage Saturday sessions Weekly sessions

– Day of the week One day a month Four days a year

16

A Variety of Starting Options

Summer startFall startWinter start

We conduct informational sessions prior to the start of sessions.

17

Limiting Factors

TimeMoney--for stipends, subs,

materialsCommunicationMelding professional development

and coursework/earning university credit for professional development

18

Distinctions Between Coursework and Professional Development

Task All Course Credit

Professional Readings

Read and think about Extra readings, reflections

Student Work Collect, analyze, and discuss

Written analyses, collaboration, readings

Planning Share, collaboratively plan

Provide evidence, analyze more deeply, connect with student thinking

Collaboration Meet in groups to discuss their work

Submit log/participate in online discussion group

Math Problems

Solve some outside of sessions

Write-up problems and discuss strategies

Assessment Surveys, questionnaires, quick writes

Math quizzes

19

Assessing Students’ Understanding of Multiplication What is multiplication? Write down anything you know

about multiplication. You can use words, numbers and drawings.

20

Assessing Students’ Understanding of Multiplication

Can you draw a picture to show how you would solve this problem?

Here is a multiplication fact: 7 x 6Explain how you would figure out the answer.

Can you write a story problem for 7 x 6? What does the 7 mean? What does the 6 mean? What does the answer tell us?

21

How We Measure Impact

Teacher growth: Content and pedagogy– Quantitative and anecdotal data

Student achievement– Gains on CST– Matched pairs analysis: San Diego City

Schools students

22

Impact on Teachers’ Content Knowledge

Rational Number Geometry

% Correct

Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test

Mean 61% 79% 45% 66%

Mode 69% 90% 43% 75%

Minimum 18% 44% 18% 31%

Maximum 95% 95% 75% 90%

23

Sample Item from the Rational Number Test

Place the following numbers in order from smallest to largest: 0.42, 0.50, 0.423

Margaret, Sammy and Marie placed them in order as follows. What might each of the students have been thinking? How could you find out?

Margaret: 0.5 0.42 0.423Sammy: 0.423 0.42 0.5Maria: 0.42 0.423 0.5

24

Sample Item from the Geometry Test

A teacher gave her class the following problem:A floor measures 12 ft. x 15 ft. How much carpet would be needed in square yards?

Here are two student’s responses:Dave’s answer: 15 x 12 = 180. I divided by 3Because there are 3 feet in a yard. My answer is60 square yards.Enrique’s response: But I got 20 square yards. I divided 15 by 3 and then 12 by 3 and thenmultiplied. a) Is Dave’s answer correct or incorrect?b) If Dave’s answer is correct, explain how you know

it is correct.

25

Changes Reported by TeachersQuestion:

“As a result of this program, . . .”

% Responding

“Yes”

Do you have a better understanding of mathematics?

94%

Has your mathematics teaching changed? 98%

Have your beliefs changed? 87%

Have your expectations of what students should know and be able to do mathematically changed?

85%

26

Impact on Teachers’ Instructional PracticesTeachers report that they now: Try new strategies in their classrooms; Select among many tools including the

textbook, the pacing guide, and CGI principles; and

Recognize good mathematical problems from the text that will help students meet the standards.

27

Impact on Student Achievement

Challenges– Data collection and design

– Quantitative data

– Performance assessment analysis

– How to identify a control/comparison group

28

Gains on CST Mean Scale Scores, 2003 - 2005

Grade State-wide San Diego

2 9.0 23.0

3 17.8 25.6

4 10.4 20.6

5 17.5 30.3

6 10.4 20.6

Matched-pairs study in progress.

29

One Teacher’s Comments About Our Impact on Her Teaching

“I feel my knowledge and understanding of mathematics has been expanded to the point where I will never teach math the same again. I know too much about group/partner work, using manipulatives; reflective writing, student-directed teaching, student responsibility. In short, I feel enlightened. I feel I finally understand math.”

30

References

Loucks-Horsley, S., et al. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

31

Contact Us

[email protected]@projects.sdsu.edu

http://pdc.sdsu.edu