© delos partnership 2009. all rights reserved. sales and operations planning flexible dynamic lean...
TRANSCRIPT
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Sales and Operations PlanningFlexible Dynamic Lean Business Planning
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Conflicting objectives
Inventory
Customer Service
ManufacturingCosts
ManufacturingFlexibility
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Vertical Functional Organisation
MDMD
SalesSales MarketingMarketing TechnicalTechnical OperationsOperations FinanceFinance HRHR
R& D
R& D
MKTG
MKTG
SALES
SALES
OPS
OPS
ACCTS
ACCTS
HR
HR
Directors
Managers
Supervisors/Team Leaders
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Disintegrated Business Planning
Long termplan
Short termPlan
Medium TermPlan
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
The Delos ModelFor Business Integration
InnovationInnovation
VisionVision
StrategyStrategy
PrioritisationPrioritisation
DemandDemand
SupportSupport
SupplySupply
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Objectives of Integrated Enterprise Leadership
• Vision and Strategy supported by :• One set of numbers at all times• Integrated Plans• Realistic Plans
• Visibility and transparency [3-5 years]• Teamwork• Decisions made in timely fashion• More planning, less fire-fighting• Consistent performance measures• Delivery of the strategy• Top Down and bottom up
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integration of Processes and Tools
Strategic Review
IEL Review
Demand Plan
Master Schedule
Project Plan
MRP/CRP/
Activities
WTL/
Orders/
Tasks
How Often Yearly Monthly Weekly Daily Hourly
Who Board Board Managers Computer Computer
Units £’s Families Families/
Products
Parts/
Activities
Parts/
Tasks
Horizon 5 years 3 years 2 years 2 years 2 years
Focus 3-5 years 0-3 years 0 to Cum Lead Time
0 to Cum Lead Time
Part Lead Time
Time buckets
Years Months Weeks Days Hours
DetailDetail
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
IntegrationMission, values, and
envisioned future
OperationalRequirements
Business of The Future
Winningbusiness
Strategy, SWOT, Critical success factors,
Measures, responsibilities
Strategy, SWOT, Critical success factors,
Measures, responsibilities
Integrated Operational Plan for all of the functions in the business
ProgrammeManagement
OperationsManagementContract
delivery
Tactics, Detailed plans, Measures, Development
Plans
Tactics, Detailed plans, Measures, Development
Plans
Delivery of requirements for
customers and shareholders
Delivery of requirements for
customers and shareholders
LearningAnd
DevelopmentPerformanceManagement
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integrated Enterprise Leadership• A vision and strategy – communicated to
everyone and supported by facts not hopes• Clear focus on strategic competency• All-embracing performance measures• Process not functional “orientation”• Integration of all of the business processes • Teamwork in pursuit of common objectives• Focus on delivery of customer and shareholder
value• A process for managing change• Getting people to follow the changed direction
without appearing to launch too many “initiatives”.
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integrated Enterprise Leadership • To operate effectively an Integrated
Enterprise Leadership process needs:– Timely acquisition of data on sales, inventory
etc.– Formal process for preparation of data and
information– Time for analysis of information– Discussions to get to conclusions– Time to prepare agendas and
recommendations– A regular well communicated and adhered to
process
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integrated Enterprise Leadership
AACCTTIIOONN
AACCTTIIOONN
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
InnovationReview
InnovationReview
CustomerDemandReview
CustomerDemandReview
SupplyPlan
Review
SupplyPlan
Review
PriorityReview
PriorityReview
Stage 1Stage 1
Stage 2Stage 2
SeniorTeam
Review
SeniorTeam
Review
Stage 5Stage 5
Stage 7Stage 7
Stage 3Stage 3
SupportReview
SupportReview
Stage 6Stage 6
Stage 4Stage 4
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Planned Calendar …….
•Dates set in advance (annually)•Everyone knows when it is•Agenda pre-set•Preparation happens•If nothing to discuss, then no meeting•Almost non-voluntary
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Characteristics of IEL process
• Formal set of meetings• Agendas “pre-set”• Linked series of meetings• Focus on right decisions being made at
right level• Preparation not “thank goodness for the
last minute”• Facts not opinions• Focus on Long-term and not short-term.
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integrated Business Plan
Integration of Innovation
Innovation
Supply Chain
DemandPlan
SupportActivities
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Euros
Sales Contrib
Sales/Profit
Financial Analysis
Budget
Previous
Current
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Management of Innovation needs a process
Stage/Gate Process
Gate1
Gate1
Gate2
Gate2
Gate3
Gate3
Gate4
Gate4
Gate5
Gate5
Stage 0Stage 0 Stage 1Stage 1 Stage 2Stage 2 Stage 3Stage 3 Stage 4Stage 4
Review
InitialInvestigation
InitialInvestigation
ResearchAnd Develop Full businessCase
ResearchAnd Develop Full businessCase
Develop Product in lineWith customerRequirements.
Develop Product in lineWith customerRequirements.
Test market products and service . Develop market
Test market products and service . Develop market
Full production marketing and Sales of product
Full production marketing and Sales of product
Stage 5Stage 5
IdeationIdeation
Is it a good idea?
Does it fit our
criteria ?
BusinessCase and
prioritisation.
Meets customer, supply and
financial criteria.
Meets customers’
and operations
needs..
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Management of Innovation
Integrated Project Management – Programme Management
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th QtrQtr
Capacity - Design Resource
Dem Cap
Req Cap
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Integration with Supply Chain
Design
Purchase
Intermediate Manufacture
Sub-assemble
Finish
Distribute
Cumulative Lead TimeCumulative Lead Time
Insert NewProducts Here
Insert NewProducts Here
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
New Product Development Performance Definition
Purpose
Horizon
Source of information
Number of new products developed on time
Improve NPD process
New product development time
Activity schedule in planning system or project plans
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
NPD Performance ReportProject reference
Planned Date
Actual Date
Hit/ Miss
Comment
A1001 23/1/08 02/2/08 Miss Scope change
A1096 23/1/08 15/2/08 Miss Key components not available
B2304 24/1/08 17/1/08 Hit
B2403 25/1/08 18/1/08 Hit
D1237 26/1/08 27/1/08 Miss
D1453 26/1/08 20/1/08 Hit
NPD Performance = 3/6 = 50 %
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
IEL Process Steps
AACCTTIIOONN
AACCTTIIOONN
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
Stage 1Stage 1
Stage 2Stage 2
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
Stage 5Stage 5
Stage 7Stage 7
Stage 3Stage 3
SupportSupportReviewReview
SupportSupportReviewReview
Stage 6Stage 6
Stage 4Stage 4
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Common Reasons for Not ForecastingI can never make it
100% accurate
My business has toomany unforeseen
peaksMy business isdifferent - you can’t forecast it
I don’t know who’s responsible
for it anywayIt’s not in my
objectives
I’m measured on getting high sales
- so who cares about the forecast
The factory nevermake what I forecast
anyway
Nobody thanks me for it – so why
bother ?
Do you want me toSell or Forecast ?
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Forecasting – Defined
A forecast is a formal request to the Supply Management function from Sales and Marketing
to have the product, materials and capacity available according to the quantity and at the
time that they anticipate the demand will occur from the customer to ship the product to their
premises
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Forecasting Needs a Simple Process
Filter Filter DemandDemand
ComputeComputeforecastforecast
CaptureCaptureActualActual
C O N S E N S U S C O N S E N S U S F O R E C A S TF O R E C A S T
C O N S E N S U S C O N S E N S U S F O R E C A S TF O R E C A S T
Hold Demand ReviewHold Demand Review
Agree commercialAgree commercial plansplans
AgreeAgreeExceptional demandExceptional demand
AssumptionAssumptions written s written down and down and
agreedagreed
AssumptionAssumptions written s written down and down and
agreedagreed
ReviewReviewAccuracyAccuracy
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Forecast Accuracy
Definition
Purpose
Horizon
Source of Information
Percent of items within a tolerance
Assess the degree of flexibility required by the supply side and to improve the process
Cumulative lead time (= purchasing plus manufacturing)
Forecasting module Sales module
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Forecast Accuracy Report – by Error
Group Product Forecast Actual Error % Error
Product Group A
Product 123 100 120 +20 20
Product 456 200 150 -50 25
Product 789 300 330 +30 10
Total 600 600 0 17 %
Product Group B
Product 345 200 300 +100 50
Product 567 500 300 -200 40
Product 890 600 700 +100 17
Product 678 200 400 +200 100
Total 1500 1700 200 40 %
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
IEL Process Steps
AACCTTIIOONN
AACCTTIIOONN
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
Stage 1Stage 1
Stage 2Stage 2
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
Stage 5Stage 5
Stage 7Stage 7
Stage 3Stage 3
SupportSupportReviewReview
SupportSupportReviewReview
Stage 6Stage 6
Stage 4Stage 4
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Supply Planning should happen at two levels..
-3 -2 -1
Supply Plan 125 125 125
Actual Supply 119 118 121
Difference -6 -7 -4
Cum Diff -13 -17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last Supply Plan 125 125 120 120 120 120 120 120 120
New Supply Plan
Difference
Cum Diff
Q4 Q1
360 360
FamilyFamily
DetailDetail Master \Schedule
CapacityRequirements
Plan
ComponentPlan
RoughCutRoughCut
MRP/CRP
Filling Machine : Cap Req
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Months
Hours
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Rough Cut Capacity Planning
RequiredCapacity
DemonstratedCapacity
Family Volumes x
Rate per hour
Family Volumes x
Rate per hour
Actual ProductionPer month
Actual ProductionPer month
CriticalResources
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Order Promised Date
Actual Date
Promised Quantity
Actual Quantity
Hit/ Miss
1435 22/1/09 22/1/09 1050 1050 Hit
1560 23/1/09 23/1/09 2000 2000 Hit
1573 24/1/09 23/1/09 300 300 Miss
1745 25/1/09 25/1/09 500 500 Hit
1800 26/1/09 26/1/09 650 650 Hit
1820 26/1/09 26/1/09 1000 1000 Hit
Customer Service Report – Against Promise Date
Customer Service to Promise = 5/6 = 83 %
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Financial plan
Pull together all the volume plans into one financial picture
• Volume x price = revenue• Volume x cost = variable cost• Margin = revenue – variable cost• Overheads are fixed• Profit is the result• Assumptions on assets• Cash Flow calculation
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Preparation of the budget
Financial projection enables– Visibility of current year outturn – early– Visibility of subsequent year(s) to enable
budget to be one set of numbers – earlyRequires culture change
– No six month process– No sandbagging of the numbers– Simple cut-off period– “Roughly right” rather than “precisely wrong”
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Budgets – the issues
• Annual budgets irrelevant in a fast changing world
• It is a game played by any number of players
• Budget is used as a “control mechanism” – but it does not work
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
IEL Process Steps
AACCTTIIOONN
AACCTTIIOONN
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
InnovationInnovationReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
CustomerCustomerDemandDemandReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
SupplySupplyPlanPlan
ReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
PriorityPriorityReviewReview
Stage 1Stage 1
Stage 2Stage 2
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
SeniorSeniorTeamTeam
ReviewReview
Stage 5Stage 5
Stage 7Stage 7
Stage 3Stage 3
SupportSupportReviewReview
SupportSupportReviewReview
Stage 6Stage 6
Stage 4Stage 4
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Two Leadership Stages
Prioritisation•Family Summary
– Major Changes– Main Assumptions– Threats & Opportunities– Decisions Taken– Decisions to Take– Recommendations,
Implications, Costs•Alignment to Business Plan•Innovation Status
Senior Team Review
SUMMARY BY FAMILY
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
Demand Supply InventoryBudget Current Plan Previous Plan Prior Year
SUMMARY BY FAMILY
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
Demand Supply InventoryBudget Current Plan Previous Plan Prior Year
SUMMARY BY FAMILY
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
Demand Supply InventoryBudget Current Plan Previous Plan Prior Year
Total Number of Changes
Current Last Project
1020
30 4050
6070
Engineering
20
2530
35
40
Other
Current Last Project
20
2530
35
40
Business Review
-8 -4 0 +4 +8
Current Last Project
1020
30 4050
6070
20
2530
35
40
20
2530
35
40
-8 -4 0 +4 +8-8 -4 0 +4 +8
Current Goal
Current Plan FY9x
Plan Actual
0
2550
75
100
10
1520
25
30
100
125150
175
200
100
125150
175
200
Current
Margins
Revenue
Project Cost to Date
0
2550
75
100
10
1520
25
30
100
125150
175
200
100
125150
175
200
1st Pass Test Percent
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
INVENTORY
ACTUAL
BUDGET
DEMAND PLANSUPPLY
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
VOLUME
TIME/MONTHS TIME/MONTHS-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
BUSINESS PLAN
ACTUAL
£ M'sREVENUE
BUSINESS PLAN
PROFITABILITY
ACTUAL
Weeks0
20
40
60
80
100
O/T Delivery Performance
3 1 3 2 0 0 0
7 7 12 6 8 6 11
#No. of Late Deliveries #No. of On-Time Deliveries
A
B
CMonths
Customer's Rating
A
B
C
STDHRSOR
UNITS
WEEKS
REQUIRED CAPACITY
PLANNED CAPACITY(DEMONSTRATED OUTPUT)
RESOURCE A
Total Number of Changes
Current Last Project
1020
30 4050
6070
Engineering
20
2530
35
40
Other
Current Last Project
20
2530
35
40
Business Review
-8 -4 0 +4 +8-8 -4 0 +4 +8
Current Last Project
1020
30 4050
6070
20
2530
35
40
20
2530
35
40
-8 -4 0 +4 +8-8 -4 0 +4 +8
Current Goal
Current Plan FY9x
Plan Actual
0
2550
75
100
10
1520
25
30
100
125150
175
200
100
125150
175
200
Current
Margins
Revenue
Project Cost to Date
0
2550
75
100
10
1520
25
30
100
125150
175
200
100
125150
175
200
1st Pass Test Percent
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
INVENTORY
ACTUAL
BUDGET
DEMAND PLANSUPPLY
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
VOLUME
TIME/MONTHS TIME/MONTHS-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
BUSINESS PLAN
ACTUAL
£ M'sREVENUE
BUSINESS PLAN
PROFITABILITY
ACTUAL
Weeks0
20
40
60
80
100
O/T Delivery Performance
3 1 3 2 0 0 0
7 7 12 6 8 6 11
#No. of Late Deliveries #No. of On-Time DeliveriesWeeks0
20
40
60
80
100
O/T Delivery Performance
3 1 3 2 0 0 0
7 7 12 6 8 6 11
#No. of Late Deliveries #No. of On-Time DeliveriesWeeks0
20
40
60
80
100
O/T Delivery Performance
3 1 3 2 0 0 0
7 7 12 6 8 6 11
#No. of Late Deliveries #No. of On-Time Deliveries
A
B
CMonths
Customer's Rating
A
B
C
A
B
CMonths
Customer's Rating
A
B
C
STDHRSOR
UNITS
WEEKS
REQUIRED CAPACITY
PLANNED CAPACITY(DEMONSTRATED OUTPUT)
RESOURCE A
STDHRSOR
UNITS
WEEKS
REQUIRED CAPACITY
PLANNED CAPACITY(DEMONSTRATED OUTPUT)
RESOURCE A
Strategic Programme 1Strategic Programme 2 Strategic Programme 3 Strategic Programme 4 Strategic Programme 5 Strategic Programme 6 Strategic Programme 7 Strategic Programme 8 Strategic Programme 9 Strategic Programme 10 Strategic Programme 11 Strategic Programme 12 Strategic Programme 13 Strategic Programme 14
Strategic Programme 1Strategic Programme 2 Strategic Programme 3 Strategic Programme 4 Strategic Programme 5 Strategic Programme 6 Strategic Programme 7 Strategic Programme 8 Strategic Programme 9 Strategic Programme 10 Strategic Programme 11 Strategic Programme 12 Strategic Programme 13 Strategic Programme 14
Continuously reviewing the balance between strategy and operationsContinuously reviewing the operational projection and strategic fit
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Summary By Family
SUMMARY BY FAMILY
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
MAJOR ASSUMPTIONS________________________________________________
DECISIONS OUTSTANDING________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATIONS________________AND COSTS ________________
________________________________
MAJOR CHANGES ________________________________________________________________
DECISIONS MADE ________________________________________________________________
VULNERABILITIES ________________________________________________________________
Demand Supply InventoryBudget Current Plan Previous Plan Prior Year
DiscussionsDiscussionsshould be aboutshould be aboutassumptionsassumptionsand not numbers !and not numbers !
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Objectives for Senior Team Review• Make decisions on major issues• Delegate issues to the right level• Review the long-term picture not
short term crises• Review process based performance
measures• Review and develop long-term
strategy• Make it the meeting for the Executive
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Agenda for discussion• Current Business situation
– Plan versus Budget/Business Plan– Plan versus last plan (volume/value)
• Strategic Review [1/quarter]• Assumptions on which plan is based• Issues for Resolution
– Innovation development issues– Supply/Demand Allocation issues– Major Capacity changes required– Outsourcing– Capital Expenditure Plans– HR/IT support issues– Reorganisation requirements
• Performance measures• Review of IEL process against assessment criteria
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
40
The Core Measures and Financial Effect
Relationships to RoCE components
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.41 Perfect Customer Orders
ROCEROCE
ProfitProfit CapitalCapital
SalesSales CostsCosts
MaterialMaterial LabourLabour OverheadOverhead
FixedFixed CurrentCurrent
StocksStocks CreditorsCreditors DebtorsDebtors
Perfect Customer OrdersPerfect Customer Orders
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Removal of the budget• Get over the discussion about shareholders demand it• Recognise that budgets are for long-term financial and cash
flow projection and not performance measurement• Set a long term strategy capable of being reviewed every
quarter• Recognise that life changes, and dynamic business planning
and execution is required• Use the Balanced Scorecard, and/or the Delos seven
measures as the basis for measurement of how well you are doing, and how well the business works.
• IEL is about planning the work, and working the plan to meet the customers’ requirements in all areas of the business; finance is to add up the results – that’s all.
• The hardest part is to give up a lifetime of politics and numbers games in exchange for a robust set of assumptions.
• Evolution happens. Revolution is sometimes necessary.
© Delos Partnership 2009. All rights reserved.
Prerequisites for successful process1. Common agreed process2. Prepared agendas3. Right attendees4. Focussed discussion5. Actions identified and being taken6. Honesty and realism throughout7. Elimination of other meetings8. Commitment to formal process9. Commitment to follow the plan10. If you can’t do it say so – Silence is approval.