zettek, charles
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Opportunities for Local Government Efficiencies – Real Examples from Across the State
May 19, 2009
Charles Zettek Jr.Director of Government Management Services
585-327-7068 or [email protected]
![Page 2: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
What are factors for success?
Is the objective structural change or real and measurable savings?
Are savings measured as local tax savings or true net savings within the system?
Assume – want to achieve real savings, not simply a tax shift.
2
![Page 3: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Structure versus System Costs
Structure costs – inefficiencies caused by too many decision makers – too many layers Basic governance cost question Costs optimized within borders but not
regions
3
![Page 4: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
þ þ
þ
þ þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þþ
þ þþ
þþ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þþ þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þ þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ þþ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þþ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
þ
N
EW
S
Fire Stations in Monroe County1.5 Mile Radius
Fir e d ep ar tm en tsþ
Mo nr oe Cou nt y
Legend
1 0 1 2 Miles
![Page 5: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Structure versus System Costs
System Costs – inefficiencies caused by requirements imposed on everyone Example: laws governing hiring in the
public sector: Taylor, Civil Service, Triborough
Stifles creative alternative solutions
5
![Page 6: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Measuring Real Savings
Differentiate between: cost efficiencies ($), process efficiencies (time) knowledge efficiencies (results)
Cost shifts are not real NET savings But, cost shifts can reduce local property
taxes
6
![Page 7: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Real Examples - 1
Fire Example #1 – Town of Brighton/City of Rochester IMA Town pays City $100,000/year City provides immediate call response from
City fire station Savings:
• Real costs – efficient use of costly equipment• Response time • Sharing expertise
7
![Page 8: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Real Examples - 2
Fire example # 2 - Villages of Johnson City and Endicott – Shared Fire Chief Both villages have full-time career fire
departments Discussing sharing one chief Savings:
• Share cost of a chief• Structural efficiencies – can manage as two
units within a larger combined group8
![Page 9: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Real Examples - 3
Police examples – Town of Clay police dissolution – contract
with Sheriff for specified service. $900,000 savings from staff reductions and other efficiencies
Other town/village police consolidations – Lancaster, Evans - true cost reductions
9
![Page 10: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Real Examples - 4
Courts Village courts dissolved – merged with
Town:• Albion, Brockport, Oakfield• Cost and process efficiencies
Shelby-Ridgeway Joint Town Court – 2003• Reduced from 4 justices to 2• Savings: - $14,000/year• True consolidation
10
![Page 11: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Real Examples - 5
Public Works – Town and Village of Cobleskill Single combined department with one
Director of Public Works Costs shared 50/50 Overseen by joint oversight board True cost savings: personnel - $50,000 Also process and knowledge efficiencies
11
![Page 12: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Real Example # 6
Central Business Office in BOCES – Broome –Tioga, Greater Southern Tier, Otsego Northern Catskills Prime benefits – fewer staff, integrated
systems (I.T.), knowledge efficiencies Savings are real, but also result in cost
shifts from local property taxes to BOCES
12
![Page 13: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Real Example #7
One Batavia – Town and City of Batavia Consolidation Discussions Public debate over the summer Interesting questions – what will be the
benefits, and what are the risks (i.e. does one side win at the expense of the other)
Two tiered taxing system examples exist – Rome, Oneida, Saratoga Springs
13
![Page 14: Zettek, Charles](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022080907/55aa8a511a28ab80108b4662/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Conclusion
So far have not reduced the number of governments (high level structures)
Have reduced internal structures Have reduced real costs (although
small %) More people are looking at
fundamental changes – dissolution and consolidation.
14