GRANITE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2015-16 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT REPORT

Linda Mariotti, Assistant Superintendent, Teaching and Learning Services

Dr. Rob Averett, Director, Student Assessment December 6, 2016

2016 SAGE 3 Year Comparisons

SY 15 to SY 16

Utah10 subjects4 subjects13 subjects

Granite10 subjects4 subjects13 subjects

UTAH AND GRANITE SAGE RESULTS WERE SIMILAR

Granite School District

Increased (10) ELA 3, 5, 6, 8 Math 3, 5, 6, 8, Science 5, 6

Unchanged (4) Math Sec I Science 4, 8 Physics

Decreased (13) ELA 4, 7, 9, 10, 11 Math 4, 7, Sec II, Sec III Science 7, Earth Science,

Biology, Chemistry

Utah statewide

Increased (10) ELA 3, 5, 6 Math 3, 6, 8, Sec II Science 4, 6, Biology

Unchanged (4) Math 4, 7 Science 5, 8

Decreased (13) ELA 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Math 5, Sec I, Sec III Science 7, Earth Science,

Chemistry, Physics

SCHOOLS CAN ACHIEVE HIGH GROWTH DESPITE POVERTY

SCHOOLS WITH TEACHERS ACHIEVING HIGH MEDIAN GROWTH PERCENTILE

ACADEMY PARK SCHOOL HOWARD R DRIGGS SCHOOL REDWOOD SCHOOL BENNION JR HIGH CYPRUS HIGHARCADIA SCHOOL HUNTER SCHOOL ROBERT FROST SCHOOL BONNEVILLE JR HIGH GRANGER HIGHBEEHIVE SCHOOL JACKLING SCHOOL ROLLING MEADOWS SCHOOL EISENHOWER JR HIGH HUNTER HIGHCALVIN S. SMITH SCHOOL JAMES E MOSS SCHOOL ROSECREST SCHOOL GRANITE PARK JR HIGH KEARNS HIGHCARL SANDBURG SCHOOL JIM BRIDGER SCHOOL SILVER HILLS SCHOOL HUNTER JR HIGH OLYMPUS HIGHCOPPER HILLS SCHOOL LAKE RIDGE SCHOOL SOUTH KEARNS SCHOOL KEARNS JR HIGH SKYLINE HIGHCOTTONWOOD SCHOOL LINCOLN SCHOOL SPRING LANE SCHOOL SCOTT M MATHESON JR HIGH TAYLORSVILLE HIGHCRESTVIEW SCHOOL MAGNA SCHOOL STANSBURY SCHOOL VALLEY JR HIGHDAVID GOURLEY SCHOOL MILL CREEK SCHOOL TAYLORSVILLE SCHOOL WASATCH JR HIGHDIAMOND RIDGE SCHOOL MONROE SCHOOL TWIN PEAKS SCHOOLDOUGLAS T. ORCHARD SCHOOL MORNINGSIDE SCHOOL UPLAND TERRACE SCHOOLEASTWOOD SCHOOL NEIL ARMSTRONG ACADEMY VISTA SCHOOLFOX HILLS SCHOOL OAKRIDGE SCHOOL WEST KEARNS SCHOOLGEARLD WRIGHT SCHOOL OAKWOOD SCHOOL WEST VALLEY SCHOOLGRANGER SCHOOL PHILO T. FARNSWORTH SCHOOLWESTBROOK SCHOOLHILLSDALE SCHOOL PLEASANT GREEN SCHOOL WESTERN HILLS SCHOOLHILLSIDE SCHOOL PLYMOUTH SCHOOL WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL

PROFICIENCY COMPARED TO SIMILAR DISTRICTS

3rdLA

4thLA

5thLA

6thLA

7thLA

8thLA

9thLA

10thLA

11thLA

3rdMA

4thMA

5thMA

6thMA

7thMA

8thMA

Sec.Math

I

Sec.Math

II

Sec.Math

III

4thSC

5thSC

6thSC

7thSC

8thSC.

EarthScien

ce

Biology

Chemistr

y

Physics

Granite 32% 28% 34% 35% 27% 30% 30% 35% 27% 38% 40% 37% 32% 31% 30% 29% 25% 33% 30% 36% 36% 27% 32% 22% 30% 33% 33%

Ogden 37% 30% 39% 45% 31% 27% 35% 31% 21% 43% 33% 35% 32% 28% 20% 23% 14% 24% 31% 37% 39% 25% 30% 36% 28% 45% 18%

SLC 45% 44% 46% 48% 43% 39% 32% 35% 39% 55% 55% 49% 40% 46% 43% 26% 29% 35% 47% 47% 48% 47% 40% 14% 33% 33% 25%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

2016 SAGE Proficiency of Similar Districts

GSD Poverty 15.55%

SLCSD Poverty 20.90%

OSDPoverty 23.70%

DISTRIBUTION OF UTAH SCHOOL GRADES

UTAH PARTICIPATION AND PERFORMANCE

UTAH STUDENT SUCCESS COMPARED NATIONALLY

Top 10 States by Percentage of Success on AP Exams:New Hampshire 71.1%

Connecticut 71.0%

New Jersey 69.8%

Massachusetts 68.4%

South Dakota 67.9%

Pennsylvania 66.9%

Utah 66.2%Minnesota 65.9%

Wisconsin 65.9%

Vermont 65.5%

Six Year

Trend

N = 4,952N = 4,157 N = 4,579N = 4,132N = 3,807N = 3,305N = 3,121

GSD AP

RESULTS COMPARED

TO STATE AND

NATIONALRESULTS

GSD

Tests

Passed

GSD

Percent Passed

GSD

M

ean Score

Utah

Mean

Score

Difference

GSD

and

Utah

USA

M

ean Score

Difference

GSD

and U

SA

Research 3.00 3.00 0.00 2.98 0.02Seminar 2.67 2.67 0.00 2.86 -0.19Art History 93 89% 3.82 3.44 0.38 2.94 0.88Music Theory 34 62% 2.98 3.39 -0.41 2.97 0.01Studio Art 2D Design Portfolio 25 81% 3.35 3.60 -0.25 3.40 -0.05Studio Art 3D 8 89% 3.89 3.75 0.14 3.23 0.66Studio Art Drawing 17 100% 3.71 3.63 0.08 3.40 0.31English Language & Composition 119 48% 2.65 3.06 -0.41 2.81 -0.16English Literature & Composition 338 69% 3.08 3.16 -0.08 2.75 0.33Government & Politics - Comparative 12 35% 2.26 2.91 -0.65 3.07 -0.81History - European 86 51% 2.65 2.70 -0.05 2.70 -0.05Human Geography 390 58% 2.79 2.94 -0.15 2.66 0.13Economics - Macro 8 50% 2.94 3.38 -0.44 2.84 0.10Economics - Micro 9 60% 2.93 3.59 -0.66 3.04 -0.11Psychology 171 80% 3.58 3.41 0.17 3.06 0.52Government & Politics - US 180 60% 2.89 2.99 -0.10 2.64 0.25History - US 301 52% 2.67 2.79 -0.12 2.70 -0.03History - World 287 54% 2.60 2.68 -0.08 2.60 0.00Calculus AB 49 40% 2.30 3.24 -0.94 2.94 -0.64Calculus BC 190 73% 3.43 3.60 -0.17 3.81 -0.38Computer Science A 10 77% 3.38 3.06 0.32 3.01 0.37Statistics 242 71% 3.11 3.46 -0.35 2.86 0.25Biology 117 77% 3.33 3.03 0.30 2.84 0.49Chemistry 49 38% 2.30 2.81 -0.51 2.64 -0.34Environmental Science 11 61% 3.28 2.59 0.69 2.55 0.73Physics 1 46 34% 2.26 2.52 -0.26 2.29 -0.03Physics 2 4 22% 2.17 2.90 -0.73 2.83 -0.66Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism 9 41% 2.77 3.58 -0.81 3.44 -0.67Physics C: Mechanical 50 71% 3.17 3.35 -0.18 3.54 -0.37Chinese Language 3 100% 3.00 3.73 -0.73 4.23 -1.23French Language 1 50% 2.00 2.92 -0.92 3.24 -1.24German Language 1 100% 5.00 3.03 1.97 3.20 1.80Japanese Language 2 100% 4.00 2.31 1.69 3.62 0.38Latin 1 50% 2.50 3.33 -0.83 3.00 -0.50Spanish Language 151 86% 3.51 3.53 -0.02 3.76 -0.25Total Exams 3019 61% 2.91 3.07 -0.16 2.85 0.06

ACT FIVE YEAR TRENDS: PARTICIPATION AND RESULTS

WHAT PERCENT OF OUR STUDENTS MEET ACT BENCHMARKS?

SCHOOL AVERAGE SCORES COMPARED TO STATE AND NATIONAL

ACT English ACT Math ACT Reading ACT Science ACT Composite

n =

National 20.1 20.6 21.3 20.8 20.8 2,090,342

State 19.5 19.7 20.9 20.3 20.2 41,466

Granite District 18.0 18.3 19.5 18.8 18.8 4,119

Cottonwood HS 17.8 18.1 19.0 18.8 18.6 384

Cyprus HS 17.0 16.9 18.5 17.8 17.7 503

Granger HS 16.0 16.6 17.6 17.2 17.0 597

Granite Connections HS 12.3 14.7 14.3 14.0 14.0 69

Hunter HS 16.5 17.4 18.5 17.8 17.7 609

Kearns HS 16.1 16.7 17.6 16.9 16.9 466

Olympus HS 21.3 20.8 22.3 21.5 21.6 489

Skyline HS 24.0 23.1 25.1 23.8 24.1 450

Taylorsville HS 17.4 18.1 19.0 18.6 18.4 552

ACT, INC: ANALYSIS ABOUT SCORE IMPROVEMENT

aMake sure all students access the ACT.

aMake core curriculum a priority.

- 57% of student reported taking courses that are “core or more.”

aMake sure students are taking the right kinds of courses.

- 17% took less than 3 years of math; 6% were college ready. By comparison 34% of students taking 3 years were college ready.

- 15% took 3 years natural science; 15% were college ready By comparison 28% of students taking 3 years were college ready.

aEvaluate rigor of courses.

- 69% of tested cohort falls into lowest three math score ranges.

aPlan guidance activities for students career and college aspirations.

UTAH GRADUATION RATE:FIVE YEAR TREND

UTAH GRADUATION RATE:FIVE YEAR TREND