youth in care transition to adulthood : needs and resources development of a youth peer support...
TRANSCRIPT
Youth in CareTransition to Adulthood : Needs and ResourcesDevelopment of a youth peer support network
Presentation content
1. Introduction
2. Quebec youth in care - transition to adulthood
3. Réseau l’Intersection de Québec (RIQ) Historical perspective Goals Governance structure
4. Conceptual framework Peer support Civic life participation Partnership
5. Evaluation process
1. Introduction
Largest Canadian province : area 1 667 441 sq. km (15% NTA - 17 administrative regions)
Population : 8 million [2nd largest (23% NTP) - French speaking -79%; english 8%]
Capital : Quebec City (Old historical district on UNESCO’S World Heritage List )
Area : 454 sq. km (city) Population : 530 168 inhabs.
Aged 0-24 years = 25%
Quebec City
Province of Québec
1. IntroductionCentre jeunesse de Québec – Institut universitaire State institution whose reason is to help youth and families
overcome adversity and promote personal, family and social well-being.
Three missions Child welfare institute (1/16) Rehabilitation institute for youth with
social problems University institute of social services
1. IntroductionCentre jeunesse de Québec – Institut universitaire Six aspects must be covered to fullfill this last mission as a
university institute :1. Research (must pertain to the organization's mission, needs
and priorities)2. Education and practical training (Interveners, professionals
and students)3. Knowledge transfer 4. Development of innovative practices 5. Evaluation (Interventions’ efficiency and outreach as well as
experimentation and support in the development of innovative practice)
6. Research outreach
2. Quebec youth in care - transition to adulthood
At the Centre jeunesse de Québec-Institut universitaire , nearly 900 youth graduate from care every year.
Youth in transition face many challenges : Lack of family support Low income (education, training, social skills) Residential instability Substance abuse Emotional distress Etc.
2. Quebec youth in care - transition to adulthood
The importance of peer-support Several researchers suggest that initiatives based on peer-support
should be encouraged. Peers might represent a significant source of support during the
transition to adulthood.
«Peer support is about understanding another’s situation empathically through the shared experience of emotional and psychological pain. When people find affiliation with others they feel are ‘like’ them, they feel a connection. It is a system of giving and receiving help founded on key principles of respect, shared responsibility and mutual agreement of what is helpful».(Mead, 2001).
3. Réseau l’Intersection de QuébecHistorical perspective This initiative was inspired by Youth in Care Canada, also known
as the National Youth in Care Network (since 1986). This organisation is driven by Canadian youth and alumni from care.
2010Project proposal
2011Youth
consultation
2012Gathering youth
and potential partners
2013Selecting a
coordinatorFunding
Committee set up
2014Non-profit
organization status
Summer program activities
Official launching
3. Réseau l’Intersection de Québec
Goals Provide material, informational and emotional support to youth
aging-out of care
Enhance transitioning youth’s social network through peer-support
Maximize the use of available resources through partnership; Increase young people’s participation in their community’s civic
life Install a dialogue between youth and decision makers regarding
social services meant for youth aging out of care
3. Réseau l’Intersection de Québec
Governance structure
Board members
Partner’s committee
Youth’s committee
Volunteer’s committee
General assembly
4. Conceptual framework
favors a youth-adult shared control participation. Involved adults act as models for youth and offer various types of support. Tasks and responsibilities are distributed between adults and young people according to each one’s interest and expertise.
Authors suggest that an approach which puts forward principles of shared control between adults and young people is susceptible to offer optimal conditions for youth’s empowerment. Indeed, youth who are connected to adults with resources increase their social capital. Adults can expand youth’s social networks by exposing them to other influential adults.
4. Conceptual frameworkPeer supportHelp offered by individuals sharing similar life experiences results in : better connection more authentic empathy normalizes emotional reactions arouses feelings of hopeMany authors mention that youth value adults that bare a likeness to them, that is, have similar life experiences and faced similar challenges. It seems to give them more credibility, make them more trustworthy.
is a peer support network (young coordinator, social grouping of youth sharing similar life experiences). We hope RIQ will: increase youth’s thrust (hopefully through non-judgmental attitudes) increase youth’s willingness to share their life experience and thus receive
the help they really need offer mutual support Increase youths’ leadership and empowerment
4. Conceptual frameworkCitizen participation Citizen’s contribution to finding answers to their community’s needs. This contribution
implies a shared dialogue with other citizen’s in order to transform and improve community life.
The RIQ wishes to educate and guide young people aging out of care towards an increased participation in their community’s civic life . Let them be change agents in their community’s development. Young people who are involved in producing knowledge that impacts policy and action in their communities may develop a stronger sense of responsibility towards others.
Citizenship education
Citizen participation
Exercise of political power
4. Conceptual frameworkCitizen participation
Citizen participation benefits in many ways : Better understanding of community issues More effective answers to community needs Adequacy between community needs and services Redistribution of power, resources and information Development of citizen knowledge and competencies
For youth, citizen participation may results in : Increased self-esteem Better understanding and appropriation of what is at stake Acquisition of new competences and skills Increased life quality
4. Conceptual frameworkPartnership
Integrating existing services is a challenge.
Partnership, that is a “shared project based on a commitment between different social actors in which the mission, the goals, the strategies and the duration are precisely defined” (Ninacs, 2002 : 201) is primordial. This partnership is not about creating new services for the community. Instead, it seeks to add value to existing services and to promote the integration of those services.
By involving many partners, this initiative seeks to ensure that community services are known to youth aging out of care, are available to them and are coherent with their expressed needs.
4. Conceptual frameworkPartnership Several partnerships have been established within the community. Targeted services are from three main areas :
Housing Employment Social integration
5. Evaluation processResearch objectivesDescribe the needs and available resources for youth aging out of careEvaluate eventual effects of the Réseau l’Intersection de Québec initiative
Research questions 1. What are the needs of aging out of care youth ?2. What community resources are available to support these youth?3. What are the stakeholder’s perception of the peer-support network
initiative ?
Youth
Participants Child welfare workers
Partners
5. Evaluation processQuestionnaires (variables)
Par
tner
s
Chil
d w
elfa
re w
orke
rsYou
th
Independent livingAwareness of available resources
Perceived and received social support
Adult-youth collaboration
Empowerment
Citizen participation
Awareness of available resources
Partnership
Adult-youth collaboration
Citizen participation
Expectations about the peer-support network
Awareness of available resources
Services integration
Adult-youth collaboration
Citizen participation
Expectations about the peer-support network
5. Evaluation processQuestionnaires (examples) Independent living : employment, education, housing
Awareness of resources : victimization, substance abuse, food supply
Social support : scope, connectedness, types of support
Adult-youth collaboration : respect, communication, information access
Empowerment : self-esteem, autonomy, optimism, power
Citizen participation : abilities, active participation
Partnership : sharing resources and responsibilities, coordination
Services integration : communication, cooperation, collaboration
5. Evaluation process
Research schedule
Spring 2014Development of research design
Scientific evaluation
Summer 2014
Ethic committee approval
Fall 2014Experimental
project
Winter 2015Apply for grant
funding
Spring 2015Knowledge
transferPursue the evaluation
process
Contact informationResearcher : Marie-Claude Richard, Ph.D. Laval University, [email protected]
Research programing manager :France Nadeau , MSW Centre jeunesse de Québec-Institut universitaire, [email protected]
THANK YOU!TAK !
ReferencesAhrens, K., R., DuBois, D. L., Richardson, L. P., Fan, M.-Y. et Lozano, P. (2008). Youth in foster care with adult mentors during adolescence have improved adult outcomes. Pediatrics, 121(2), 246-252.
Avery, R., J. et Freundlich, M. (2009). You're all grow up now: termination of foster care support at age 18. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 247-257.
Boisclair, M. et Dionne, M. (2003). Le partenariat : de l'émergence à la mise en oeuvre. Une recension des écrits 1990-2001: École nationale d'administration publique.
Clayden, J. et Stein, M. (2005). Mentoring young people leaving care. York, Angleterre: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Courtney, M. E. et Dworsky, A. (2006). Early outcomes for young adults transitioning from out-of-home care in the USA. Child and Family Social Work, 11, 209-219.
Crocetti, E. et Meeus, W. (2014). “Family Comes First!” Relationships with family and friends in Italian emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence(0). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.02.012
Cushing, G., Samuels, G. M. et Kerman, B. (2014). Profiles of relational permanence at 22: Variability in parental supports and outcomes among young adults with foster care histories. Children and Youth Services Review, 39(0), 73-83. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.001
Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D. et Rowe, M. (2006). Peer Support Among Adults With Serious Mental Illness: A Report From the Field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(3), 443-450. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbj043
ReferencesGreenen, S. et Powers, L. E. (2007). « Tomorrow is another problem ». The experiences of youth in foster care during their transition into adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 1085-1101.
Hiles, D., Moss, D., Thorne, L., Wright, J. et Dallos, R. (2014). “So what am I?” – Multiple perspectives on young people’s experience of leaving care. Children and Youth Services Review(0). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth. 2014.03.007
Lambert, M. (2007). La participation citoyenne au niveau local: différents moyens et des idées pour se lancer: Union des Villes et Communes de Wallonie.
Lanctôt, N. (2005). Que deviennent les adolescentes judiciarisées près de dix ans après leur sortie du Centre jeunesse ? Criminologie, 38(1), 139-162.
Langlois, A.-M. (2006). La participation citoyenne au coeur de la responsabilité populationnelle. Québec: Ministère de la Santé et des Service sociaux.
Lavoie, F. (2001). Les groupes de soutien et les groupes d'entraide. Dans F. Dufort et J. Guay (dir.), Agir au coeur des communautés. La psychologie communautaire et le changement social (pp. 157-185). Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval.
Levitt, M. J., Levitt, J., Bustos, G. L., Crooks, N. A., Santos, J. D., Telan, P., et coll. (2005). Patterns of Social Support in the Middle Childhood to Early Adolescent Transition: Implications for Adjustment. Social Development, 14(3), 398-420. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00308.x
ReferencesMunson, M. R., Smalling, S. E., Spencer, R., Scott, L. D. et Tracy, E. M. (2010). A steady presence in the midst of change: Non-kin natural mentors in the lives of older youth exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(4), 527-535. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.11.005
Ninacs, W. A. (2002). Types et processus d'empowerment dans les initiatives de développement économique communautaire au Québec. Thèse de doctorat inédite, Université Laval, Québec.
Pagé, M., Bouchard, P. et Mireault, G. (2013). L'Odyssée 2012 : une aventure vers l'autonomie. Québec: Centre jeunesse de Québec - Institut universitaire.
Pallaveshi, L., Balachandra, K., Subramanian, P. et Rudnick, A. (2014). Peer-Led and Professional-Led Group Interventions for People with Co-occurring Disorders: A Qualitative Study. Community Mental Health Journal, 50(4), 388-394. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9612-8
Rutman, D., Hubberstey, C. et Feduniw, A. (2013). When youth age out of care: where to from there? Final report. Victoria: Gouvernement du Canada: Sécurité publique Canada.
Scannapieco, M., Connell-Carrick, K. et Painter, K. (2007). In their own words: callenges facing youth aging out of foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work, 24(5), 423-435.
Singer, E. R., Berzin, S. C. et Hokanson, K. (2013). Voices of former foster youth: Supportive relationships in the transition to adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(12), 2110-2117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.10.019
ReferencesSpencer, R., Collins, M. E., Ward, R. et Smashnay, S. (2010). Mentoring for Young People Leaving Foster Care: Promise and Potential Pitfalls. Social Work, 55(1), 225-234.
Table de concertation des forums jeunesse régionaux du Québec. (2012). Cadre de référence. La participation citoyenne et les forums jeunesse régionaux. Québec.
Tougas, A.-M. (2011). Obstacles et facilitateurs à la participation citoyenne dans les politiques publiques municipales : le cas des PFM. Gatineau, Canada: Université du Québec en Outaouais.
Wong, N., Zimmerman, M. et Parker, E. (2010). A Typology of Youth Participation and Empowerment for Child and Adolescent Health Promotion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 46(1-2), 100-114. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9330-0