xuan wang and colette l. heald 7th international geos-chem user’s meeting, may 5, 2015 this work...

19
Xuan Wang and Colette L. Heald 7th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting, May 5, 2015 This work is funded by U.S. EPA Simulating Brown Carbon and its Direct Radiative Forcing: From “Bottom-up” to “Top-down”

Upload: spencer-johnston

Post on 19-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Xuan Wang and Colette L. Heald

7th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting, May 5, 2015

This work is funded by U.S. EPA

Simulating Brown Carbon and its Direct Radiative Forcing:

From “Bottom-up” to “Top-down”

Brown Carbon: The Absorbing Organics

• Recent studies show some organic aerosols can absorb light (so-called ”brown

carbon”: BrC) (Arola et al., 2011; Hecobian et al., 2010; Chakrabarty et al., 2010 etc.)

• Usually found in biomass burning and biofuel emissions.

• Most absorbing at UV wavelengths, leading to a high absorption angstrom exponent

(AAE).

• BrC contributes to global warming but its effect has not been well estimated.

Visible SpectrumUV IR

BC absorption

BrC absorption

Estimating BrC: Building a Bottom-up Simulation

Optical Properties

Aerosol Mass

Estimating BrC: Building a Bottom-up Simulation

Optical Properties

Aerosol Mass

Measured Imaginary part of refractive Index in biomass burning/biofuel sources

Estimating BrC: Building a Bottom-up Simulation

Assume 50% of biofuel/biomass burning POA to be primary BrC

Assume aromatic SOA to be secondary BrC

(Wang et al., 2014)

Assumption for GEOS-Chem

Optical Properties

Aerosol Mass

Mass Absorption Coefficient = 1 m2/g at 440nm for primary BrC

0.3 m2/g at 440nm for secondary BrC

Assumption for GEOS-Chem

Building a Bottom-up Simulation

• The global mean absorbing DRF of BrC is estimated to be +0.07 Wm-2

• Other model studies of BrC are also built on simple assumptions or single

experiments (Feng et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2015.)

0.001 0.01 0.1 1

Simulated Annual Average Direct Radiative Effect (DRE) of BrC

(Wang et al., 2014)

Deriving BrC Absorption from Measurements

• Previous work assumes AAE=1 for BC to separate BrC (Chung et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2015 etc)

Wavelength

Is the AAE = 1 Assumption Reasonable?

• Previous work assumes AAE=1 for BC to separate BrC (Chung et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2015 etc)

• Theoretically, the AAE is sensitive to size, mixing state and the chosen wavelength

• In field observations, AAE usually ranges from 0.55 to 1.7 (Bahadur et al., 2012; Gyawali et al., 2009; Lack and Langridge, 2013)

Mie Calculation

BC (core) diameter, nm

AAE

Refractive Index (BC) = 1.95-0.79i (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Bond et al., 2014)

2014 AERONET AAODBC + BrC

BC only (range defined

by Mie calculations)

Developing a New Method to Derive BrC

Define: Wavelength Dependence of AAE (WDA) WDA

2014 AERONET AAODBC + BrC

BC only (range defined

by Mie calculations)

Developing a New Method to Derive BrC

Derived BrC: A Top-down Constraint on Regional Sources

Relationship between derived BrC AAOD at 440nm and observed AAOD at 675nmfrom AERONET 2 years monthly data (2011-2012)

R2 = 0.75Slope = 0.50

Select data in North America only, and dominated by biofuel emissions

R2 = 0.91Slope = 0.30

R2 = 0.75Slope = 0.50

Derived BrC: A Top-down Constraint on Regional Sources

R2 = 0.86Slope = 0.54

R2 = 0.75Slope = 0.50

Select data in East Asia only, and dominated by biofuel emissions

Derived BrC: A Top-down Constraint on Regional Sources

R2 = 0.84Slope = 0.55

R2 = 0.75Slope = 0.50

Select data in Europe only, and dominated by biofuel emissions

Derived BrC: A Top-down Constraint on Regional Sources

R2 = 0.91Slope = 0.42

R2 = 0.75Slope = 0.50

Select data in dominated by biomass burning emissions globally

Derived BrC: A Top-down Constraint on Regional Sources

Summary and Future Work

• The global mean BrC absorption that we derive from AERONET is ~30% lower than

the bottom-up simulation.

• We could use the regional source relationships shown above to constrain model

simulations of BrC.

Summary and Future Work

• The global mean BrC absorption that we derive from AERONET is ~30% lower than

the bottom-up simulation.

• We could use the regional source relationships shown above to constrain model

simulations of BrC.

• Our AERONET estimate for BrC absorption is only for one wavelength (440 nm),

we need additional information on the wavelength dependence of BrC absorption

(the AAE) to estimate the global radiative impacts of BrC.

Summary and Future Work

Surface observation in GOAMAZON campaign (http://www.arm.gov/sites/amf/mao/)

• The global mean BrC absorption that we derive from AERONET is ~30% lower than

the bottom-up simulation.

• We could use the regional source relationships shown above to constrain model

simulations of BrC.

• Our AERONET estimate for BrC absorption is only for one wavelength (440 nm),

we need additional information on the wavelength dependence of BrC absorption

(the AAE) to estimate the global radiative impacts of BrC.

BrC AAE for 370/430nm

Days in 2014

BC AAE for 430/880nm

Derived BrC-AAOD at 440nm in 2012

MAMDJF

SONJJA

Selected AERONET sites with significant BrC influenceSites affected largely by dust have been removed