wtzimi great investors and hedge fund managers: their methods and evaluation prof william t ziemba...
DESCRIPTION
WTZIMI 4:3 16.Using a modified Sharpe ratio that does not penalize gains Summary over funds of negative observations and arithmetic and geometric meansTRANSCRIPT
WTZIMI
Great investors and hedge fund managers: their methods and evaluation
Prof William T ZiembaAlumni Professor of Financial Modeling and Stochastic Optimization (Emeritus)
Mathematical Institute, Oxford UniversityICMA Centre, University of Reading
William T Ziemba Investment Management Inc, Vancouver, BCDr Z Investments Inc, San Luis Obispo, CA and
Private International Wealth Management, BC Capital Group, Nassau
CARISMA Seminar, June 25, 2007
Session 4: Measuring the performance of investors and hedge fund managers
WTZIMI 4:2
15.Using the Sharpe ratio
WTZIMI 4:3
16.Using a modified Sharpe ratio that does not penalize gains
Summary over funds of negative observations and arithmetic and geometric means
WTZIMI 4:4
• we want to determine if Warren Buffett really is a better investor than the rather good but lesser funds mentioned here, especially the Ford Foundation and the Harvard endowment, in some fair way.
• The idea is presented in a Figure below where we have plotted the Berkshire Hathaway and Ford Foundation monthly returns as a histogram and show the losing months and the winning months in a smooth curve. We want to penalize Warren for losing but not for winning. So define the downside risk as
The symmetric downside Sharpe ratio performance measure
• This is the downside variance measured from zero, not the mean, so it is more precisely the downside risk.
• To get the total variance we use twice the downside variance
WTZIMI 4:5
17.Is Buffett a better investor than the Ford Foundation or the Harvard Endowment?
Comparison of ordinary and symmetric downside Sharpe yearly performance measures
Buffett: still does not beat the Ford Foundation - and Harvard is also better than Buffett but not Ford with the quarterly data
higher, rest all lower
WTZIMI 4:6
We all know that Buffett is better but we need another way to show it
That is long run wealth growth of the Kelly criterion
Why? Tails still too fat
Thorp (2006) shows that Buffett is essentially a full Kelly bettor.
Thorp dinner in 1969: someday that man (Buffett) will be the richest person in the world he told his wife.
He bought Berkshire stock at 100, now worth about $110,000/share.
WTZIMI 4:7
Berkshire Hathaway versus Ford Foundation, monthly returns distribution, January 1977 to April 2000
Bh has bigger gains, yes, but also bigger losses, than the Ford Foundation
WTZIMI 4:8
Return distributions of all the funds, quarterly returns distribution, December 1985 to March 2000
WTZIMI 4:9
Summary of the means, both arithmetic and geometric, and the Sharpe and symmetric downside Sharpe ratios for the monthly quarterly and yearly data all annualized
WTZIMI 4:10
18 Incentives in hedge funds: effect of incentive fees and managers investment in the fun (eating your own cooking)
Kouwenberg-Ziemba (2007) paper on this
• Call option on investors’ money is worth 0 to 18%
• When fund manager has 30%+ in the fund, risk taking behavior is greatly reduced
WTZIMI 4:11
19.Performance of hedge funds and funds of funds
• Most funds do not make back their fees
• Fund of funds do better