world bank document · pdf filetable a - 3 : ancol cdf supplementary emp matrix ... rkl/rpl...

Technical Assistance for Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (EIA / SIA)Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project (JUFMP) –Grant TF#054683-IND

Ancol Updated RKL/RPL

Supplementary Report

SEPTEMBER 2011

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb406484

Typewritten Text

E2658 v11

i

Contents

Glossary................................................................................................................................ 1Summary .............................................................................................................................. 31 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Context ................................................................................................................... 41.2 Purpose and scope of Status Report ...................................................................... 5

2 Adequacy of 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL ................................................................ 52.1 Specific review of the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL ........................................... 6

2.1.1 Indonesian requirements ................................................................................. 62.1.2 Broader considerations .................................................................................... 7

2.2 Additional information and developments................................................................ 92.2.1 Approval of the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL and Supplementary Report.............. 92.2.2 Additional baseline environmental information ................................................. 92.2.3 Sediment quality ............................................................................................ 102.2.4 Community Consultation................................................................................ 102.2.5 Commencement of Ancol CDF Construction.................................................. 102.2.6 Offsite impacts from Ancol CDF..................................................................... 10

2.3 Overall assessment .............................................................................................. 113 Ancol CDF Safeguards ................................................................................................ 12

3.1 Institutional arrangements..................................................................................... 123.1.1 PT. PJA ......................................................................................................... 123.1.2 Ancol Construction Contractors (ACC)........................................................... 133.1.3 JUFMP Supervision Consultant (SC) ............................................................. 133.1.4 PIUs............................................................................................................... 143.1.5 PMU .............................................................................................................. 143.1.6 Construction Contractors (CC)....................................................................... 143.1.7 DKI BPLHD.................................................................................................... 14

3.2 Enhanced safeguards ........................................................................................... 143.2.1 Integration of JUFMP and Ancol CDF activities.............................................. 153.2.2 “Good practice” construction and supervision ................................................ 153.2.3 Sediment and other fill / cover material .......................................................... 163.2.4 Traffic management....................................................................................... 17

Appendix 1 Detailed review of Ancol AMDAL and Ancol Updated RKL/RPL ................. 18Appendix 2 Development of Ancol CDF and interaction with JUFMP project ................ 26Appendix 3 Ancol integrated Environment Management and Monitoring Matrix ............ 27

List of Tables

Table A - 1 : Detailed review of Ancol 2006 AMDAL and 2009Ancol Updated RKL/RPL... 18Table A - 2 : Development of Ancol CDF and interaction with JUFMP project (Schedule subject to periodic adjustments).......................................................................................... 26Table A - 3 : Ancol CDF Supplementary EMP Matrix ........................................................ 27

1

Glossary

Institutional – Functional English namesBBWS – CC Regional Office for the Ciliwung-Cisadane River Basin (Balai Besar

Wilayah Sungai Ciliwung-Cisadane, BBWS-CC)DKI BPLHD Environmental Management Agency of Jakarta Provincial GovernmentDGCK Directorate General Human Settlements, Ministry of Public WorksDGWR Directorate General Water Resources, Ministry of Public WorksDKI Jakarta Jakarta Provincial GovernmentPMU Project Management UnitPIU Project Implementation UnitPT. PJA PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol, the concessionaire and operator of the

Ancol reclamation project

Environmental documentation:AMDAL Environmental Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan,

AMDAL, it includes ANDAL plus RKL / RPL)ANDAL Environmental Impact Assessment/Statement (Analisis Dampak

Lingkungan, ANDAL)RKL Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan,

RKL)RPL Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan,

RPL)Updated RKL / RPL Product resulting process whereby there is a substantive change in

project scope from an already approved AMDAL sufficient to warrant an updating of the environmental and social management and monitoring plans, but the change is not so large as to require a completely new AMDAL. As will be seen this approach was adopted by DKI BPLHD and the AMDAL Commission to enable the disposal of JUFMP dredge material at the already approved Ancol reclamation site. The Updated RKL / RPL supersedes the earlier AMDAL, but does not necessarily have to re-address issues that were considered to have been adequately considered in the earlier AMDAL and for which there will be no substantial changed effects

JUFMP Project-specific terminologyB3 Waste (or B3) Hazardous and Toxic Waste (Limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun)JUFMP Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project. [in various project documents,

used synonymously with ‘Jakarta Emergency Dredging Initiative (JEDI)’]

Phase 1 Set of project sites for initial implementation of overall JUFMP. The Phase 1 sites were chosen because of their critical importance with respect to flood relief, and also because resettlement will not be required. A single AMDAL has been prepared for this set of Phase 1 activities

Phase 2 The remainder of project sites to be undertaken under JUFMP.RPF Resettlement Policy Framework; a policy document to be followed by

JUFMP for resettlement activities associated with the project. There isno resettlement for Phase 1 project sites. The RPF is based on WorldBank policy / practice and Indonesian law

Project Sites Identified individual components of JUFMP; either a defined length of drain/river / floodway, or a defined size of waduk (reservoir/flood

2

retention basin). Engineering designs have been based on each site; AMDAL preparation has been or will be for individual project site

Terminology arising from JUFMP Contractual and implementation aspects

Construction Contractor The contractor whose Construction Contract under the PIU will undertake dredging, embankment works, sediment transport and associated activities for construction of JUFMP

Contractor Detailed ESMP An Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) to be prepared on award of Contract by the Construction Contractor with detailed information on ESM practices to be followed. This must be based on the Construction Contract conditions, the AMDAL, this Supplementary Report, and other reports referred to in bidding documents. It must also follow all relevant laws and regulations. Community consultation prior to submission of the ESMP for Supervision Consultant formal approval is mandated

Contractor ESM Plan Generic term used to include both the “Contractor General ESMP” and the “Contractor Detailed ESM Plan”

Contractor Preliminary ESMP An ESM Plan to be prepared as part of the Technical Bid. It will include similar contents as per Contractor Detailed ESMP, but to a lesser degree of detail. Community consultation is “recommended” as part of preparation

ESM Environmental and Social Management (includes environmental and social monitoring as appropriate)

Supervision Consultant Consultant under contract to PMU. The Supervision Consultant will undertake day-to-day supervision of Construction Contracts – the role normally identified as “Engineer” (as principal’s representative). The Supervision Consultant will also have a substantive role in environmental and social management and monitoring, with main focus on Construction Contractor’s ESM but also including specific duties in relation to public communication / grievances, to resettlement (for some of the Phase 2 site activities) and tomonitoring and reporting to DKI BPLHD on behalf of the project proponents (i.e. PIUs)

3

Summary

PT. PJA had an AMDAL prepared and approved in 2006 for reclamation of a near-shore area in Jakarta Bay based on filling with sand derived from regional sources (the AncolAMDAL). Following the announcement of the Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project (JUFMP), an Ancol Updated RKL / RPL was prepared and approved in 2009, to enable part filling of the area with JUFMP dredged material. Other changes in design were an increased channel width separating the reclamation area from the main shoreline from about 80 m to 200m and slight changes to overall shape and area. Inherent but not explicit in the AncolUpdated RKL / RPL was that the facility was to be designed, constructed and operated as a Confined Disposal Facility (hence the term ‘Ancol CDF’ is commonly used to refer to the facility).

An independent review of the Ancol AMDAL and Ancol Updated RKL / RPL (based largely on a World Bank supplied-checklist) was undertaken in 2009 by ERM (a consultancy firm). This current supplementary report further reviews the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL, and considers progress in JUFMP planning and design and in other factors that have occurred in the interim.

The original Ancol AMDAL and Ancol Updated RKL / RPL followed appropriate and standard Indonesian practices such as preparation by independent certified AMDAL specialists, specified consultations during preparation and assessment by the AMDAL Commission.

The overriding conclusion from the reviews and consideration of progress in JUFMPplanning and design is that the Ancol CDF site and Ancol Updated RKL / RPL integrates well with the JUFMP project. Some aspects that might be expected to be addressed in an environmental assessment are missing or only very briefly addressed in the Ancol Updated RKL/RPL and/or earlier AMDAL - this probably arose because during scoping it was considered that they were of little or no relevance considering the specific project situation. This report identifies these aspects and concurs that they are of little or no relevance.

Additionally it could be argued that greater consideration should have been given to future land use implications at the Ancol CDF site. The Ancol Updated RKL/RPL is specific to the filling / reclamation activity, and almost any type of future land use would require separate environmental assessment at the time. Furthermore, all indications are that the filling with JUFMP dredged sediment would not limit future land uses.

This supplementary report concludes that some additional management and monitoring would be a prudent assurance to strengthen the implementation of safeguards measures.

Based on this assessment, a supplementary EMP is presented in this supplementary report. This complements the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL and focuses mostly on the management and monitoring of environmental and social issues during the development of the AncolCDF. Costs are mostly related to normal engineering / site management supervision, a need to integrate activity with the JUFMP Supervision Consultant and for some post-filling soil chemical analysis.

4

1 Introduction

1.1 Context

The “owner” / “proponent” of the Ancol reclamation site in the near shore area of Jakarta Bay is PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol (PT. PJA). Environmental approvals to reclaim the area were granted in 2006 following standard Indonesian AMDAL requirements, with fill material mostly based on sand.

Following a very severe flood that inundated Jakarta in February 2007, the concept of a Jakarta Urgent Flood Mitigation Project (JUFMP) evolved and has been in preparation since then. The JUFMP involves dredging accumulated sediment in the selected key floodways, canals and waduks (retention basins) within the Jakarta urban area and transporting the dredged material to a suitable disposal location.

Several options were assessed and it was concluded that the Ancol reclamation site was the most appropriate facility for the disposal of the JUFMP dredge material1 since:

It is central to the JUFMP project sites; It already had environmental approvals for development; By being in a nearshore area the social effects would be minimal (there would be no

resettlement); and It represented a wise use of resources, replacing sand with dredged material as part

filling material for reclamation.

Interaction with the Environmental Management Agency of Jakarta Provincial Government(DKI BPLHD) and the associated AMDAL Commission determined that the change of fill material would require that there be an Ancol Updated RKL / RPL to address issues associated with change of fill material. This was prepared in accordance with local requirements including scoping, preparation, consultations, specific consideration of social issues and AMDAL Commission hearing. The updated RKL / RPL was approved by DKI BPLHD in 2009. The area approved was +/- 119 ha site, and slight changes to physical boundaries eventuated, especially in relation to widening the distance between the existing shoreline (itself reclaimed) and the Ancol CDF reclamation site.

Recognising different “ownership” but also the need for integration, the approved AncolUpdated RKL / RPL specifically identifies the physical and administrative boundaries between Ancol CDF and the JUFMP project.

Since approval of the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL: JUFMP project preparation has progressed significantly, especially in relation to:

o Selection of a set of JUFMP sub-projects for JUFMP Phase 1 activities, with associated detailed design and preparation and approval of an AMDAL for these sub-projects.

o On-going detailed design and studies for environmental approvals for other JUFMP sub-projects and studies into necessary resettlement at some of these sub-project sites.

o Establishing project institutional and implementation arrangements. There has been on-going review of the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL, especially in

relation to interaction with JUFMP requirements.

1 Excepting solid wastes (which will be separated and disposed at the existing Bantar Gebang landfill), and hazardous material if these are found (which is planned to be disposed at an existing commercial licensed existing hazardous material landfill, i.e., PPLi)

5

A further subsequent proposed change in design of the northern boundary (dyke) of the Ancol CDF was reviewed and approved by DKI BPLHD. This proposed design change was also review by the World Bank, and the recommendations of this review was acknowledged and adopted prior to the approval of DKI BPLHD.

It is stressed that the 2006 Ancol AMDAL and the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL were specifically focussed on the reclamation activity itself at the Ancol site in line with Indonesian requirements. The fact that the reclamation site itself was in conformity with the long term spatial plan precluded detailed evaluation of “land use” issues, especially because the site is currently a near shore area. Boundaries were drawn in relation to the JUFMP activities. The 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL included detailed evaluation of the result of bringing JUFMPdredge material to the Ancol CDF site. The actual dredging activities themselves and transport of the JUFMP dredge material to the Ancol CDF site is addressed in the JUFMP-specific AMDALs. Evaluation of future land use activities was effectively left to post-reclamation AMDALs or similar environmental permitting which will be known only when there are specific proposals for the use of the area.

1.2 Purpose and scope of Status Report

This supplementary report: Assesses whether the earlier Ancol AMDAL and the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL

adequately address the social and environmental issues associated with the use of the site for JUFMP dredge material disposal (Section 2) including:

o Considering the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL as a stand-alone document(Section 2.1)

o Addressing new and updated information (Section 2.2)o Making an overall assessment, integrating the earlier Ancol Updated RKL /

RPL and the new and updated information (Section 2.3)o Overall conclusions

Identifies the current status of use of the Ancol site for JUFMP dredge material disposal (Section 3) addressing:

o Institutional arrangements (Section 3.1)o Initial construction o Enhanced safeguards (Section 3.2)

Appendices present: Nominal schedule of Ancol CDF development and interaction with JUFMP (Appendix

1) Supplementary EMP for Ancol CDF. (Appendix 2)

2 Adequacy of 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL

Review of a document such as the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL could be undertaken for any one or more of the following reasons:

1. To check conformity with particular guidelines, legislation etc.2. To assess the “quality” of the document and information contained therein.3. To determine what requirements arising from the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL

might influence how the JUFMP project could be implemented.4. To assess whether conditions have changed since the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL /

RPL was prepared and approved that might result in the document and associated RKL / RPL being at least partially “invalid”.

6

These reasons are not mutually exclusive and it is a matter of judgement as to the relative importance placed on these different reasons. In this current report, focus is on the reasons identified as 1, 3 and 4 above.

The World Bank has specifically required assessment against its own provided checklist. This addresses reason 1 in part. Another check related to reason 1 is whether the document conforms to the Government of Indonesia (GOI) requirements.

In relation to reason 2 the Consultants2 believe there is little to be gained by what must be a judgemental view of the “quality” of the document and how information is presented. However, the quality and completeness of the information can be and is partially considered in relation to conformity with the World Bank checklist. This report will not specifically address reason 2 again.

At this stage of the project it important to be clear as to how the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL “enables” the JUFMP project to proceed, and what restrictions it might place on the implementation of the JUFMP project. This requires focus on reasons 3 and 4 above.

2.1 Specific review of the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL

This Section focuses on Reason 1 identified at the beginning of this section, focussing on whether the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL conforms to regulations, policies etc.

2.1.1 Indonesian requirements

While the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL effectively supersedes the earlier 2006 AncolAMDAL, both documents and processes should be considered together. The decision to require an updated RKL / RPL rather than a complete new AMDAL is made based on the consideration of whether the earlier document adequately addressed aspects that might have a fundamental bearing on whether the project should proceed or not. By proceeding with the updated RKL / RPL approach, DKI BPLHD and the AMDAL Commission inherently determined that such aspects had been adequately addressed and what was required was a focus to ensure that adequate environmental management would be in place for the Ancolsite to receive and dispose of JUFMP dredge material.

The 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL was prepared on behalf of the “owner”, PT. PJA:Proponent Name : PT. Pembangunan Jaya Ancol, Tbk.Office Address : Jl. Pasir Putih Raya Kav. 5 Ancol, North JakartaTelephone Number : (021) 6453456Facsimile number : (021) 64710502Responsible : Ir. Maleakhi JohnPosition : Head of the Department of Licensing and Special ProjectsProject Name : Development of Eastern Regions of West Ancol for ±119Ha.

Preparation was undertaken by AMDAL-certified consultants, informed by: the earlier 2006 Ancol AMDAL; specific engineering studies associated with formation of the outer retaining dike,

current studies, and soil investigations; and the ERM 2008 sediment quality studies undertaken in the JUFMP drains and

waduks;

2 The consultants retained by the PMU to prepared this supplementary report.

7

what would be involved with the JUFMP project.

Assessment of the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL was done by DKI BPLHD / AMDAL Commission, which included a series of meetings in February / March 2009 before final approval was given. Reports from these meetings indicated extensive consideration by DKI BPLHD / AMDAL Commission on a range of social and environmental concerns, with the finally approved Ancol Updated RKL / RPL addressing these aspects.

A notable aspect of the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL was the implication of the reclamation being developed as a Confined Disposal Facility (CDF), but this specific term was never used in the document. Additionally, “typical” drawings indicated sequencing of development of outer confining dikes, although there was no detailed written explanation of the whole sequencing and timing of development from initial outer dike construction, filling with dredged sediment and final covering.

It is concluded that the process was properly conducted according to GOI requirements, that DKI BPLHD and the AMDAL Commission were detailed in their assessment and ensuring safeguards and that social matters were addressed in detail.

The Ancol Updated RKL / RPL is very clear and specific about the scope and division of responsibilities between PT. PJA and JUFMP. In particular at Section 2.5.d the document states:

In the context of the activities of JUFMP, the Ancol project site is a dumping site. JUFMP is the responsible party:

o To ensure the dredged material does not contain B3 (hazardous and toxic waste) as per Government Regulation No. 85/19993. (This item further notes that based on the ERM 2008 sediment quality study, sediments do meet the criteria and can be accommodated at the Ancol reclamation site)

o For dredging and transportation of materials to the Ancol location.o For selection of transportation route and carrier traffic arrangements.

The responsibility of PT. PJA starts when a vehicle enters from Jl. RE Martadinata to the Ancol area. PT. PJA’s obligation is to:

o Provide access road in from Jl. RE Martadinata to the dumping siteo Provide a means of laundering carrier (vehicle washing) as it leaves the Ancol

area

2.1.2 Broader considerationsThis subsection is based on two separate consultants (ERM in 2009, PPA in 2010) independently reviewing the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL with some reference back to the 2006 Ancol AMDAL. Both reviews were made with assistance of a World Bank checklist, examination of the Ancol documents including notes made at the DKI BPLHD / AMDAL Commission meetings and with site visits. This detailed consolidated review is found in Appendix 1. Certain assessments and comments from these reviews require further additional discussions and considerations. These additional discussions and considerations are discussed in further detail in this and following sub-sections. The need for additional assessment / consideration arises because of one or more of the following:

Contextual aspects. This relates to either standard check-list items being of limited relevance in relation to the project considering the context of the site itself, or of what

3 Note that the term of “B3” in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL/RPL refers to hazardous wastes as categorized and defined in the standards stipulated in Government Regulations no 85/1999 on Hazardous and Toxic Waste Management.

8

the Ancol AMDAL and Ancol Updated RKL / RPL (“Ancol permitting”) actually addresses.

The documentation is non-specific about certain key aspects, especially in relation to the staging of reclamation activities and actually defining the activity as a Confined Disposal Facility.

The evaluation of potential issues associated with use of JUFMP dredged material is limited.

Mitigation measures do not necessarily consider the context of the site nor do they necessarily align with how site management will be arranged.

Context of siteThe Ancol reclamation site is a near-shore site, located in a central position off Jakarta in Jakarta Bay. The Ancol CDF facility will be separated by a channel of some 200m width from a shoreline that itself has been subject to past filling / reclamation and accretion. Furthermore, under current spatial planning reclamation of the site has been formally identified since a 1995 government regulation. Considering this context:

Long term planning issues are predetermined. The interaction with the closest residential communities (minimum of 200 m distant)

would be limited during the reclamation period. The polluted nature of the immediate site reduces inherent “pristine” environmental

quality (water and biological) and there are no nearby areas of biological value such as mangroves. Nevertheless this is not taken as a reason not to implement appropriate mitigation measures.

Context of Ancol permittingAs noted earlier, the scope of environmental permitting is limited to the reclamation stage of Ancol itself, notably excluding post-reclamation activities (to be addressed through future environmental permitting which will be known only when there are specific proposals for the use of the area) and JUFMP dredging and sediment transport activities (addressed in the JUFMP-specific AMDALs). Additionally, the sourcing of cover sand and topsoil would assume that those extractive industries themselves have appropriate environmental clearances, but assurances of the same are not specified in the Ancol mitigation measures.

Staging of reclamation activitiesDrawings and discussion in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL infer that the site will be developed as a Confined Disposal Facility (CDF), with enclosing outer dikes internally lined with geotextile developed prior to the filling with dredge material. The timing of sand and topsoil cover-layer development is not defined.

Potential issues arising from the use of JUFMP dredged materialThere is an inherent assumption that the requirement that JUFMP-transported sediment be “not B3” adequately covers the potential issues arising from the use of JUFMP dredge material. While this may be reasonable in many circumstances, additional evaluation and more specific mitigation measures would increase the safeguards.

Mitigation measuresMitigation (including monitoring) measures as proposed do not necessarily consider the context of the site nor do they necessarily align with how site management will be arranged. While potential pollution from, for example, workforce sanitation is possible, it is not addressed in relation to the context that the numbers of workers would be limited, that Jakarta Bay is already polluted and that surrounding infrequent water quality testing would not be able to distinguish whether workforce sanitation was being adequately managed. As another example, for a construction activity much of the mitigation and monitoring should be

9

focussed on aligning to Construction Contract conditions and oversight by a supervising engineer.

These are addressed later in this Supplementary Report.

2.2 Additional information and developments

Since the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL there has been: Approval of the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL by the AMDAL Commission in March 2010. Preparation of a JUFMP Phase 1 Supplementary Report, which includes further

safeguards-related recommendations beyond the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL, andwhich will also be applicable to the JUFMP project.

Detailed baseline data collection for the JUFMP Phase 2 AMDALs that are being prepared through 2010.

Additional consideration of sediment quality issues, especially to incorporate additional information from the JUFMP Phase 2 primary data collection and to consider the most appropriate manner to satisfy the DKI BPLHD JUFMP Phase 1 requirement for on-going sediment monitoring.

Additional consultations with stakeholders. Commencement of the construction of the Ancol outer confining walls (which will

form the confined disposal facility) Further consideration of potential offsite impacts from the sourcing of sand and

laterite material (in addition to JUFMP dredge material) for the construction of the Ancol CDF.

2.2.1 Approval of the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL and Supplementary ReportThe JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL was prepared for the 5 JUFMP sites for which construction is expected to commence soon after the approval of the project. This JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL was formally approved by DKI BPLHD in March 2010. The most significant issue in this report related to the Ancol site is a requirement for additional B3 monitoring at the JUFMPsites prior to and post dredging.

A JUFMP Phase 1 Supplementary Report was prepared and this provided new information arising from JUFMP detailed design, addressed the sediment quality issues arising from the JUFMP AMDAL approval conditions, re-estimated transport traffic volumes, and produced a supplementary EMP based on the JUFMP institutional arrangements with emphasis on the Construction Contractor and Supervision Consultant arrangements (which were not yet defined in detail at the time of the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL).

2.2.2 Additional baseline environmental informationAdditional baseline environmental information has been collected for the JUFMP Phase 1 and Phase 2 sub-project areas, with information most relevant to Ancol being:

Confirmation that baseline levels for various environmental parameters (especially noise, some air quality and many water qualities) already exceed environmental standards from time to time.

Additional sediment samples have been collected4 and had the quality tested – see next subsection.

4 In addition to the earlier sediment quality study (conducted by ERM consultants in 2008) which was the first comprehensive and detailed primary sediment quality study for Jakarta’s drains and waduks, and which supported much of the initial planning for the JUFMP project including the ANCOL Updated RKL / RPL and the JUFMP Phase 1 AMDAL.

10

Observations of the performance of an earlier Dutch-funded pilot project5 dredged-sludge at different times after disposal.

2.2.3 Sediment qualityThe additional assessments and consideration of sediment quality issues undertaken since the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL:

Demonstrated that the results of additional sediment sample analysis (done for JUFMP Phase 2 sites) all support the earlier sampling and analysis that none of the material is classified as B3 (i.e., hazardous and toxic waste)6.

Identified a testing protocol to be used to check sediment quality prior to dredging and on JUFMP project completion in the JUFMP drains and waduks.

Identified the need to ensure that JUFMP transport trucks could not be used for illegal transport of any non-JUFMP material (whether B3 or otherwise) to Ancol.

Assessed all sediment quality results in terms of land use using appropriate local standards and concluded that for a confined disposal facility, all sampling and testing to date supported a conclusion that there would be no constraint to future land use. Some additional confirmatory monitoring at Ancol during and after JUFMP sediment deposition is identified.

Undertook a health assessment and concluded that the health-related risks from the JUFMP dredge material are low for Ancol construction workers and for any future residents of the Ancol site.

2.2.4 Community ConsultationCommunity consultations have continued in JUFMP locations especially as part of the preparation of the JUFMP AMDAL and JUFMP social safeguards instruments. The clear and dominant and consistent themes arising from these consultations are:

Broad support for the JUFMP project, recognising the benefits of flood mitigation, acknowledging that there will be some disturbance but stressing that communities want better environmental management than for many previous projects around Jakarta.

Wish for ongoing and meaningful consultation between “the project” and the local communities.

A very strong wish for local employment.

2.2.5 Commencement of Ancol CDF ConstructionThe construction of the outer confining walls of the Ancol CDF facility commenced in the second quarter of 2010. There was significant discussion including JUFMP project engineers and environmental specialists about the construction of the outer confining walls, including a subsequent change in the design of the northern boundary (dyke) of the CDF, for which the recommendations of the World Bank review of the proposal was acknowledged and adopted prior to the approval of DKI BPLHD. Monitoring inspections of the work has also been carried out by DKI BPLHD7.

2.2.6 Offsite impacts from Ancol CDFIn addition to the JUFMP dredged material, the construction of the perimeter walls and the filling of Ancol CDF will require sand (about 8.6 million m3). According to the approved Ancol Updated RKL and RPL, this sand is to be obtained from a marine source, in the Banten Area

5 A pilot project undertaken by DKI Jakarta with Dutch government funding support to pilot dredge a minor drain in Jakarta (not part of the JUFMP project).6 Referring to Indonesian standards, which is based on international practice.7 In November 2010, with the participation of the World Bank during the inspection.

11

of the coast from North Jakarta. This location where the sand will be obtained from already has an approved Environmental Permit8. The engineering design shows that the sediment material would form the bottom most layer of the filled area, which will then be overlaid by the sand layer which will in turn be capped with laterite soil material. The volume of laterite material required is estimated at 400,000m3 to be obtained from land based sources near Bekasi, West Java that is also operating under environmental permits. The environmental impacts at the marine sources of sand and the land based source of laterite are not mentioned in the Ancol ANDAL, RKL and RPL9. All that is mentioned is that these sites have an approved AMDAL and are operating under environmental permits. PT. PJA has agreed that the JUFMP Supervision Consultant will supervise and monitor the activities at these offsite locations (for the sourcing of the sand and the laterite).

2.3 Overall assessmentConsidering the discussions in this section above, the following overall assessment and conclusions are made:

Project need is adequately established. Although the JUFMP project considered various options for dredged material

disposal, this consideration has no bearing on whether the Ancol reclamation proceeds or not. The reclamation site was planned and approved prior to the proposal for JUFMP and has a completely different objective to that of JUFMP. The use of JUFMP dredge material to part fill the Ancol CDF site is an efficient utilization of resources (reducing sand requirement in Ancol CDF) and is a win-win situation for PT. PJA as well as JUFMP.

The positive benefits are further reinforced by removing and confining sediment from the JUFMP waterways from where it is liable to be flushed into Jakarta Bay and contribute to already elevated pollution loads.

The distinction in responsibilities between JUFMP and PT. PJA with regard to the development / reclamation period is well defined and appropriate. The distinction between the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL/RPL and future environmental approvals (AMDALs) needed for any future land use is unstated, but it is important to acknowledge this distinction exists and that the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL is adequate for its purposes.

Explicit development of the reclamation site as a Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) is central to the environmental assessment and mitigation.

Additional sediment collection and analysis and assessment confirms the earlier assessment that JUFMP sediment is most unlikely to be classified as B3; the AMDAL-Commission future monitoring will provide additional safeguards; health risk from the sediment to workers and the general community is low; and with the AMDAL-required post reclamation covering with sand and topsoil there are unlikely tobe any long term adverse effects.

The construction of the Ancol CDF facility will cause the associated physical loss of near-shore polluted marine habitat, which has no conservation significance. There are no close-by areas of habitat / ecosystem significance.

There will likely be some marginal deterioration in local sea water quality from time to time, even with mitigation measures which are based on maintaining confinement and normal site sanitation. This has limited significance because of the already

8 According to the approved RKL and RPL, the environment permits for the Banten marine area to provide sand are (i) Serang Regency Number 666/750/LKH dated April 13, 2005 issued to PT. Gora Gahana and (ii) The Mining and Energy Central Amdal Commission Number 5038/0115/SJ.T/199 dated December 5, 1994 issued to PT. SAC Nusantara. The permit allows the company to exploit about 10 million m3 of sand from an area of 1,056 ha in the position of 5o 54’ 47’2’’ – 5o 56’ 12.2’’ South and 106o 11’ 39.9’’ – 106o 17’ 36.3’’ East.9 Although this issue was reviewed by DKI BPLHD during the approval of the change in the design of the northern boundary (dyke) of the CDF.

12

polluted status; normal intermittent sea water quality monitoring would be unable to detect other than gross pollution from the Ancol CDF construction and filling activities. Adequate site supervision and observation would provide appropriate and cost-effective monitoring.

Air quality related effects are likely to be localised and of short duration, potentially involving dust and windborne plastic etc., if site management is inadequate. Indications from other dredging activities in Jakarta are that odour problems are most unlikely, with the sediment being effectively odourless within a few hours of being disposed.

Local communities are inherently separated from the reclamation site by a +/- 200 m channel. There is unlikely to be any significant disturbance to these communities, though under certain conditions they would hear operations at the site and if site management is poor they could be affected by dust and windborne rubbish.

Optimal environmental and social outcomes from the reclamation / development stage would occur with a focus on

o good engineering practice by PT. PJA and its contractors at the Ancol CDF and associated sites.

o adherence to the confined disposal facility (“CDF”) principleso close supervision by the PT. PJA and its supervising engineers and

consultants to ensure that environmental and social safeguards are being followed, and

o close consultation and integration with JUFMP project implementation.

Section 3 addresses the safeguards in more detail, with a particular focus on issues not detailed in the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL

3 Ancol CDF Safeguards

This section considers safeguards relevant to the development and filling of the Ancol CDF during the period when JUFMP dredge material will be transported to the Ancol CDF. Many safeguards measures are already required by the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL and these will not be addressed further. The focus is therefore on additional measures, and the institutional arrangements to ensure that they are implemented.

3.1 Institutional arrangementsInstitutional arrangements and responsibilities for JUFMP sub-projects are well defined. Thefollowing sub-sections identify similar institutional arrangements for the Ancol CDF reclamation activity, and the necessary interactions between various parties.

3.1.1 PT. PJAPT. PJA is the concessionaire for the Ancol CDF reclamation site. It is also the proponent of the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL/RPL. PT. PJA has:

Specific legal responsibility to implement the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL. General responsibility to ensure good environmental and social management at the

Ancol CDF site, regardless of specific requirement in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL.

Agreed to implement any additional measures identified in this supplementary report and include reports of the implementation of these additional measures in the quarterly implementation reports of the RKL and RPL to DKI BPLHD.

Interests in the long term use of the Ancol site.

13

The equivalent entity for the JUFMP project are the various PIUs (Section 3.1.4), though the JUFMP PMU (Section 3.1.5) has a co-ordinating role on behalf of the PIU’s.

Although the legal responsibility remains with PT. PJA for implementation of specified and general environmental and social management at the Ancol site, this does not limit the possibility that implementation of specific aspects could be contracted to other entities.

Note that in order to further ensure the compliance to the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL: the World Bank’s “no-objection” to any given JUFMP dredging contract will be subject

to the World Bank being satisfied with the adequacy of the Ancol CDF (including having received satisfactory evidence of PT. PJA’s compliance with the AncolAMDAL and this Ancol Updated RKL/RPL Supplementary Report requirements, and compliance with the approved Detailed Engineering Drawings for the construction of the Ancol CDF), and

the JUFMP legal agreements will include provision to require the Jakarta Provincial Government (DKI Jakarta) to exercise its rights, as a shareholder, to cause PT. PJA to implement the requirements (including mitigation measures) stated in the AncolAMDAL and this Ancol Updated RKL/RPL Supplementary Report requirements.

3.1.2 Ancol Construction Contractors (ACC)This is a generic term adopted for this Supplementary Report to cover any Contractor, sub-contractors, etc., engaged by PT. PJA at the Ancol CDF site for such works as, but not necessarily limited to:

Construction and / or maintenance of external confining dikes Construction and / or maintenance of internal separating or temporary confining

dikes, if any are needed Development and / or maintenance of internal roads or tracks to facilitate movement

of JUFMP sediment delivery trucks Providers of sand, topsoil etc that might be used as specified final cover or for any

other purpose. This includes entities other than JUFMP that may be used to deliver fill material to the Ancol CDF site.

Internal drainage or similar Providers and operators of the vehicle washing facility as required under the 2009

Ancol Updated RKL / RPL. PT. PJA itself as it undertakes any works using its own resources or, for example,

day contract labour.

The equivalent entity for the JUFMP project is the (JUFMP) Construction Contractors (Section 3.1.6) engaged by the PIUs.

The supervision of the ACC is being carried out by PT. PJA through its Property Development Unit (including supervising the environmental aspects of the ACC contracts). Additionally, PT. PJA has recruited a consulting firm to carry out quarterly compliance monitoring of the ongoing construction works. PT. PJA, in compliance with the Indonesian AMDAL requirements, is preparing and submitting to the DKI BPLHD quarterly implementation reports of the RKL and RPL.

3.1.3 JUFMP Supervision Consultant (SC)

PT. PJA has agreed to allow the JUFMP Supervision Consultant (SC) to have access to the Ancol CDF and all it offsite locations (including source locations for the sand and laterite fill material) for the purposes of carrying out supervision of the approved RKL and RPLs, the Ancol Updated RKL/RPL Supplementary Report, PT. PJA’s quarterly RKL and RPL

14

Progress reports and any other tasks as specified in the Terms of Reference (TOR) of the SC. The TOR for the SC will include these responsibilities.

3.1.4 PIUsThe PIU’s (DKI Jakarta, DGCK and DGWR) are in effect the current “owners” of the JUFMPdrains and waduks which fall under their respective responsibility. Therefore they have specific ownership of the associated JUFMP AMDALs and hence responsibility forimplementation of the JUFMP AMDALs, and will retain effectively sole control of the JUFMP drains and waduks once the JUFMP projects have been signed off after completion of construction contracts.

3.1.5 PMUThe PMU within DGWR has been designated as the major unit with overall GOI responsibility for implementation of the JUFMP project. PMU has management responsibility for the JUFMP Supervision Consultant (SC), and via the SC the coordination responsibility for the Construction Contract execution for the JUFMP sub-projects and for implementing the associated AMDALs and submitting environmental monitoring reports to DKI BPLHD.

The PMU is also closely associated with defining requirements for the JUFMP Construction Contracts and for the Terms of Reference of the SC.

3.1.6 Construction Contractors (CC)The Construction Contractors will be responsible for the dredging of the JUFMP drains and waduks and transport of the dredge material from the dredging sites to the Ancol CDF in accordance with Construction Contracts. Conditions of these contracts address, inter alia, environmental and social management.

The Construction Contractors will have specific responsibilities in relation to preventing illegal transport and disposal of B3 (i.e., hazardous) waste (if any are found) to the AncolCDF site.

3.1.7 DKI BPLHDDKI BPLHD is directly involved in the assessment and approval of AMDALs (including RKL / RPL) and will have an ongoing role in monitoring implementation of the RKL / RPL. Monitoring reports for the implementation of the RKL / RPL (including the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL submitted by PT. PJA) will be assessed by DKI BPLHD.

With respect to Ancol CDF, DKI BPLHD has started monitoring the ongoing construction works and invited the World Bank to participate in the supervision and monitoring. It is expected that these joint supervision and monitoring will continue.

In the future, DKI BPLHD would also be the authority involved in the assessment and approval of any AMDALs related to any proposed land use of the Ancol CDF site.

3.2 Enhanced safeguardsConsidering the review and assessments above, this subsection presents enhanced safeguards for the Ancol CDF site to be implemented during the period of construction (construction of the CDF confining walls and the reclamation filling including sand and topsoil covering) that will:

Complement the environmental and social management and monitoring required in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL.

15

Integrate with the ESM for the JUFMP project, as established by the AMDALs and / or by later contract or requirement.

Address some issues not clearly or specifically identified in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL.

Provide additional security to ensure that all deposited material, cover material, etc., conforms to the requirement that no B3 waste is disposed at the Ancol CDF site, and to ensure that there are no constraints to future land use.

For each defined mitigation / monitoring activity responsibilities are allocated. The table in Appendix 3 summarises this information.

3.2.1 Integration of JUFMP and Ancol CDF activities

ActivityPT. PJA shall provide DKI Jakarta and the PMU updates on the progress of the construction of the Ancol CDF facility, and provide documents confirming the completion of the confinement dykes. PT. PJA will cooperate with DKI Jakarta, PMU or World Bank review of the adequacy of the confined facility for dredge material disposal (including providing satisfactory evidence of compliance with the Ancol AMDAL and the Ancol Updated RKL/RPL Supplementary Report requirements, and compliance with the approved Detailed Engineering Drawings for the construction of the Ancol CDF).

ResponsibilitiesPT. PJA to provide information and documentationDKI Jakarta, PMU and World Bank to carry out review and assessments

ActivityPT. PJA shall meet as frequently as required with PMU and / or SC to enable smooth integration of JUFMP and Ancol CDF activities. One tool to be used will be the development of (and the review and updating as necessary) a detailed schedule (an outline is given at Table A - 2) of the integrated operations

ResponsibilitiesPrimary PT. PJA and PMU to implement regular coordination meetingsSecondary SC, ACC and CC to participate in coordination meetings as necessary

3.2.2 “Good practice” construction and supervision

Activity

PT. PJA will ensure that all Ancol Construction Contractors (ACC) will have work plans which include environmental and social management plans. These should include such aspects as provision of workforce sanitary arrangements, health and safety, identification and proposed management of site specific environment and social management, training for workforce in relevant environment and social management. The detail of any Work Plan and ESMP shall be tailored to the particular activity; for example whereas a long term contract for disposal and levelling of deposited sediment would require a reasonably detailed ESMP, one for restricted activity such as vehicle washing for trucks prior to leaving the site might be

16

a 1-2 page document. Some activities would likely require no such specific plan. PT. PJA will supervise its ACC (through its Property Development Unit). Given the JUFMP interests in Ancol CDF, the SC’s supervision and monitoring activities at Ancol CDF will include reviews of the ACC’s environmental and social management of their activities.

ResponsibilitiesACC for day-to-day activity at Ancol sitePT. PJA (through it Property development Unit) for direct supervision of ACCSC for supervising and monitoring Ancol activities for JUFMPPMU to oversee SC activity and receive SC reports

3.2.3 Sediment and other fill / cover material

Activity

The PMU (with assistance from the SC) will provide PT. PJA with information as they become available of the results of the prior dredge testing of JUFMP sites / sections (see section 2.2.1). For sections where the sediment has been cleared as suitable for delivery to and disposal at Ancol CDF, PT. PJA will allow the material to be delivered to and disposed at Ancol CDF. For sections where the sediment is not cleared as suitable for delivery to Ancol CDF (e.g., if it is determined to be B3 waste, or determined to need further additional testing and interpretation), the PMU (with assistance of the SC) will ensure that these material are not delivered to Ancol CDF. The PMU (with assistance of the SC) will keep PT. PJA fully informed of the handling of any B3 waste found in JUFMP sites. PT. PJA may review and monitor the testing process in JUFMP.

ResponsibilitiesPMU (through SC) to provide information and documentation, and cooperate with any PT. PJA reviewPT. PJA to allow non-hazardous, cleared material, to be delivered to Ancol CDF

ActivityPT. PJA shall ensure that material (other than JUFMP dredged material) to be delivered to and disposed of or used at Ancol CDF by any ACC has received appropriate environmental clearance and is in accordance with the Ancol Updated RKL / RPL which limits non-JUFMP material to sand (from a defined location) and laterite. For example, this will require receiving copies of an AMDAL clearance letter prepared for sand or soil extraction operation, or a certified laboratory clearance of material. Qualified professional judgement shall be applied as the necessary type of clearance considering the nature of the material and the quantity that could be delivered. Given the JUFMP interests in Ancol CDF, the SC’s supervision and monitoring activities at Ancol CDF will include reviews of these material sourcing and delivery, including reviews of potential offsite impacts at the source locations of these materials.

ResponsibilitiesACC for day-to-day activity at Ancol sitePT. PJA (through it Property development Unit) for direct supervision of ACCSC for supervising and monitoring Ancol activities for JUFMPPMU to oversee SC activity and receive SC reports

Activity

17

PT. PJA in association with PMU assisted by the SC to undertake a programme of post-disposal sampling and analysis of JUFMP fill material areas in Ancol CDF. Two events are specified (an intermediate check 18 months after JUFMP material is first deposited to the Ancol CDF site at 10 sample sites, and approximately 1 month after the last of the JUFMP dredged material is deposited to the Ancol CDF site at the same 10 sites as the intermediate plus another 10 of more recently deposited material) with two composite samples 1 “shallow”; 1 “deep being collected at each sample site. Costs are estimated at about US$ 8,000 for the intermediate check sampling and analysis event and US$ 16,000 for the “at completion” event.

ResponsibilitiesPT. PJA to allow for post-disposal sampling at Ancol CDFSC for carry out post-disposal sampling at Ancol CDFPMU to oversee SC activity and receive SC reports

3.2.4 Traffic management

ActivityPT. PJA shall ensure that traffic management within its area of responsibility as defined in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL enables orderly arrival to, movement within and departure from the Ancol CDF by JUFMP sediment delivery trucks and any other trucks travelling to and from the site. For its part, PMU is obliged to advise to PT. PJA the likely schedules of trucks from JUFMP dredging sites giving due allowance for peaking. PT. PJA shall obtain schedules of likely truck movements from major ACC’s also working at or delivering to the Ancol CDF and as necessary co-ordinate with all parties to develop and implement an Ancol traffic management plan to avoid congestion. Potential constraints such as vehicle washing shall be identified and facilities provided to enable both timely movement of vehicles and compliance with requirements for environmental management.

ResponsibilitiesPT. PJA to develop and implement the traffic management plan within the vicinity of Ancol CDFPMU (through SC) to provide JUFMP material transportation schedule to PT. PJA

18

Appendix 1 Detailed review of Ancol AMDAL and Ancol Updated RKL/RPL

The following table presents a detailed review of principally the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL/RPL, with reference back also to the 2006 Ancol AMDAL. This is based on World-Bank supplied checklist items (Column 1) with Column 2 identifying the extent of coverage in the two documents as identified by the reviewers. Column 3 provides the reviewers’ comments considering both a brief summary of the discussion in the documents, and the reviewers’ assessments of the significance and relevance of the Checklist item. Two independent reviews were undertaken - by ERM consultants in 2009 and (through this supplementary report) by PPA in 2010. The results of these were then combined by PPA to produce the consolidated table identified below.

Table A - 1: Detailed review of Ancol 2006 AMDAL and 2009Ancol Updated RKL/RPL

Checklist item Coverage in AMDAL and

Updated RKL / RPL documents

Comments by reviewers. Further description of discussion in documents and / or reviewers’ assessments.

PURPOSE AND NEED1. Clear description of underlying need for the proposed project

OK Reclamation of the north coastline of Jakarta has been planned since 1995, supported by official DKI Jakartaregulation, planning documents etc. Specific use of the Ancol site for JUFMP sediment disposal based on DKI Jakarta Governor’s decree of 2008

2. Clear description of purpose of proposed project

OK Covered in AMDAL and Updated RKL / RPL

3. Adequate description of the proposed project

MostlyOK

OK

PROJECT ALTERNATIVES1. Consideration of all relevant alternative typesa. No action Limited / No

discussionNo discussion; the no dredging option not an alternative. Land reclamation pre-decided by earlier government policy and planning

b. alternative sites Limited / No discussion

No discussion; but alternative sites known and dismissed before proceeding to preparation of Updated RKL / RPL because of social/resettlement issues or close to conservation areas

c. Alternative design Limited / No discussion

No discussion, but design based on PT. PJA’s extensive experience in reclamation

d. Alternative control Limited / No discussion

No discussion

e. Structural alternatives OK Some discussion. Techniques based on locally proven experience.

f. Non-structural alternatives Limited / No discussion

2. All alternatives satisfy the stated purpose and need for the project

Limited / No discussion

No alternatives to either the reclamation or the dredging would satisfy the stated purposes and needs of the two projects.

3. Description of all alternative actions or projects that were, or are being considered


Overwhelming identified for flood control. JUFMPdredging part of an integrated program.

a. Size and location of reclamationb. land requirements OK Activity “forming” landc. operation and management requirements

OK

d. Auxiliary structures Limited / No discussion

19




e. Construction schedules Limited / No discussion

Two interrelated aspects to consider: scheduling of JUFMP and scheduling of Ancol development. Limited real environmental significance apart from ensuring confining external dike precedes start of JUFMPsediment delivery, and sequencing of final covering.

4. Description of initial environmental impact assessment processes and results

OK The introduction of the Updated RKL-RPL explains the earlier AMDAL process and why the Update was required.

DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING1. Region of concern defined, including boundary areas

OK Chapter 2 provides: standard practice within the AMDALsystem.

2. Physical-chemical environmenta. Air resourcesi) meteorological data (e.g. temperature, wind)

OK In 2006 AMDAL and 2009 Updated RKL / RPL

ii) ambient air quality (e.g. particulates, ozone)


iii) noise data OK In 2006 AMDAL and 2009 Updated RKL / RPLiv) mobile sources of emissions (e.g. cars and trucks)


b. Sea water OK In 2006 AMDAL and 2009 Updated RKL / RPLc. Surface Wateri) location and type (e.g. estuaries, streams, lakes and their position relative to the site)

OK The estuarine Ancol River near the project site is only important surface water body near the site.

ii) water quality information (e.g. dissolved oxygen, temperature, nutrients)


iii) existing pollutant sources (locations and amount of discharge)


Causes of measured water quality exceedances not identified, but well known that common in (especially) nearshore Jakarta Bay from combined effects of residential and industrial pollution from Jakarta.

iv) future uses OK Describedv) discussion of flooding events OK In relation to design wave heights. Plus modelling

showed very minimal sea water changes resulting from development.

d. Ground Watervi) description of key factors (e.g. depth to water table, overlying soils, geologic features)

OK In 2006 AMDAL

vii) water quality information (e.g. pH solids)


Of limited relevance since in marine environment

e. Soils and Geologyi) physiographic and geomorphology OK In 2006 AMDAL and 2009 Updated RKL / RPLii) soil structure OK In 2006 AMDAL and 2009 Updated RKL / RPLiii) ground water movement No discussion Of limited relevance since in marine environmentiv) erosion potential OK In Updated RKL / RPL. Predictions presented.v) subsidence Mostly OK Addressed in terms of design settlement, without

mention of well known overall/regional subsidence.vi) seismic activity (e.g. proximity to faults, history of earthquakes and volcanic eruptions)

No discussion Well known in Jakarta with design to address.

vii) mineral resources (e.g. locations of deposits, types and quantities, ownership of mining rights)

No discussion Considered as highly improbable

3. Biological Conditions

a. Wildlife and Vegetation Highly human-disturbed environment. i) description and listing of aquatic, OK No endangered or rare species were found.

20




wetland and terrestrial flora and fauna (e.g. species lists, abundances)ii) description and listing of native species of wildlife and vegetation present

OK Terrestrial flora and fauna and plankton and benthos are catalogued.

iii) description and listing of particularly invasive exotic species of wildlife and vegetation

No discussion Not significant.

b. Community and Habitat Characterization

OK Very limited and largely human-disturbed natural habitats.

i) maps and descriptions of the aquatic, wetland and terrestrial communities found in and around the project site

Limited descriptions, no

maps

Considered not important. Site itself disturbed environment

c. Ecologically Significant Features Most probably none.i) support of broader ecosystems by the project site (e.g. if located along a flyway or other biological corridor)


Highly unlikely to be important; part of polluted Jakarta Bay

ii) important ecological functions of the project site (e.g. nutrient source through flooding, storm water retention)


Highly unlikely to be important; part of polluted Jakarta Bay

iii) characterization of relevant disturbance regimes, natural and project-induced (e.g. floods, fire, potential impact of logging)

OK Identified as part of human-disturbed environment arising from Jakarta’s waterborne pollution.

iv) description of hydrologic processes (e.g. ground and surface water flows and durations)

Limited Surface currents addressed; limited significance

v) description of important biotic interactions (e.g. interdependence of plants and animals at the site and with other sites)

Limited. Highly unlikely to be important; part of polluted Jakarta Bay

4. Waste Management and Pollution Preventiona. Locations of expected waste disposal or discharge

Limited Site itself becomes dredged sludge confined disposal site compared with current situation of material otherwise washing into Bay with no controls.

b. Description of waste management techniques (e.g. treatment, storage, transport, recycling)

Limited Describes sludge placement details; especially confined and final top cover

c. Projected waste characteristics (e.g. types, quantities, toxicity)

OK Characteristics of dredged sludge identified.

5. Socioeconomic Environmenta. Land use Of very limited practical significance as site current

nearshore water and will be limited interaction with land use during development. Post filling new land use developments will require separate assessment.

i) description of present and historic land use

Limited Site itself currently nearshore and only occasional human use for transit (by boats) and informal recreational fishing

ii) map of present and historic land use Mostly OK Maps available, difficult to read but get general impressions. Also site is “water”, not land.

b. Population and housing Of limited practical significance as will be little interaction with surrounding population during development

i) demographic information (e.g. average household size, age, age/sex distribution, ethnic composition and community cohesion)

Limited general information

Of no practical significance

c. Economic activity Limited but adequate

Of limited practical significance as there will be littleinteraction with surrounding population during development

i) description of present economic activity (e.g. number and type of businesses,

Limited but adequate

Of limited practical significance

21




annual revenues, ownership patterns)ii) description of unique features of business community (e.g. high seasonality of trade, high outflow of profit, declining of trade or downtown revitalization)


Of limited practical significance

iii) consideration of interplay among economic activity, capacity of public services and fiscal ability of community to respond to capacity needs

Not relevant There is no information about the role of each local business groups and their relationship with public services available.

d. Community Services and Public Financesi) description of interplay among economic activity, capacity of public services and fiscal ability of community to respond to capacity needs


In Updated RKL / RPL

e. Transportation Adequate Identifies immediate land and sea routes to site. More distant routs to be addressed by JUFMP

i) description of all relevant forms of transportation for facility

OK

ii) current traffic volumes MostlyOK

Old (2004) data presented,

iii) current traffic capacity MostlyOK

Old (2004) data presented, but adequate to highlight congestion during peak hours.

iv) provision of public transportation Limited discussion Limited relevancev) assessment of the adequacy of the systems for meeting peak demands during construction and operation

Limited discussion Identifies potential constraints; responsibility for JUFMPAMDALs to address

f. Health and Safetyi) description of present health and safety issues (e.g. statistics on industrial accidents, emissions data from prior and existing facilities, levels of noise)

Limited discussion Of limited significance to general population. Not addressed in relation to Ancol site workforce

ii) identification of special populations or areas more likely to be exposed to adverse impacts


Of limited significance to general population. Not addressed in relation to Ancol site workforce

6. Cultural Resourcesa. Archaeological sites relating to the project


Highly improbable because site is nearshore

b. Paleontological sites in relation to the project



c. Historical site in relation to the project Limited / No discussion


d. Educational, religious, scientific or cultural sites in relation to the project

Limited discussion Some discussion; but very limited significance because actual site is nearshore

ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTSThe EIA discusses primary, secondary and cumulative impacts during all stages, including initial site preparation and construction; facility operation and post facility or site closure for the following:

OK Adequate for scope and context: 2006 Ancol AMDAL for reclamation and integration with master spatial planning; 2009 Updated RKL / RPL to specifically address use of JUFMP dredged sediment as main fill material; offsite dredging, transport etc to be addressed by JUFMPAMDALs; post-reclamation specific development would be subject to separate AMDALs at that stage but this not discussed.

1. Pollutant Generation, Transport and Receptorsa. Air resources Air quality effects are considered of such low

significance as to not require management and monitoring.

22




i) identification of emission sources and project emission rates and comparison to

Limited discussion Limited relevance; issues mainly site based and effects (if any) limited to workforce

ii) comparison of predicted atmospheric levels with national, state or local ambient levels

Not discussed Very difficult; non-point source of variable emission.For several parameters standards often exceeded in Jakarta airshed.

iii) description of stack emissions during operation and maintenance activities

Not relevant

iv) identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Limited discussion

b. Water resourcesi) address potential for water quality to be degraded by various factors

OK Addressed; but do not put in reasonable context given regional conditions of existing polluted urban drains flowing uncontrolled into and polluting Jakarta Bay

ii) prediction of pollutant concentrations in water bodies and comparison with existing

OK Addressed, basis of assessment uncertain.

iii) identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

MostlyOK

c. Geological resourcesi) determination of potential soil loss and mitigation activities

Not relevant

ii) identification of potential contamination sources and mitigation measures

Mostly OK Addressed, but focus of discussion of limited relevance.

d. Biological resourcesi) consideration of potential losses of biological resources within site boundaries

OK Total loss of shallow polluted marine habitat in +/-119 ha

ii) description of effluent and emission concentrations and their potential effects on biological resources

Limited relevance Theoretical pathways / effects identified; but context and significance not properly addressed.

iii) discussion of bio-accumulative effects from facility emissions and discharged

Limited discussion By confining, limited pathways. Leaching tests indicate very limited pollution potential from dredged sediment.

iv) identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Inferred By confining

2. Habitat alteration

a. Biological resources

i) address potential for construction and site preparation activities to alter critical habitats

OK Identified; non-critical nature identified by inference as modified / polluted nearshore environment.

ii) consideration of potential for secondary changes in habitats following construction

Limited /No discussion

Considered of limited significance considering surrounding habitats.

iii) assessment of possible permanent loss or displacement of vegetation

No discussed Very limited relevance; only (mostly marine) vegetation disturbance / destruction will be of very low conservation significance.

iv) identification of changes in local species composition, diversity and abundances

Inferred Total loss of polluted marine habitat

v) identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Inferred Confinement. In overall context by confinement rather than (existing) uncontrolled transport of sediment to Jakarta Bay overall improvement.

3. Waste Management and Pollution Prevention

Construction waste management probably inadequately covered, but of little significance

a. description of facility waste management plan with procedures for treatment and handling

OK Briefly discussed; not put into context

23




b. discussion of projected facility waste characteristics

OK Briefly discussed; not put into context

c. identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

OK Methods identified

4 Socioeconomic Impacts

1 identification of existing or planned land use areas lost to site preparation

Discussed Almost no relevance

2 determination of conflicting zoning requirements and land uses with site

Discussed In conformity with spatial plans

3 description of anticipated changes in nearby land as a result of the facility

Discussed Of limited relevance

4 identification of the best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Limited discussion Probably adequate, considering context.

b) Economic Activity

1 address changes in employment patterns

Discussed Hypothetical, as will depend on contractor preferences.

2 address ability of available labour pool to meet project-related employment needs


General acceptance that encouragement of local employment beneficial.

3 identification of economic multipliers used in analysis and their source

Limited discussion Of limited relevance during construction

4 discussion in potential change in overall economic activity in the region


Of limited relevance during construction

5 identification of the best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Limited discussion. Of limited relevance during construction

c) Population and Housing

1 address the relationship between employment increases and population increases

Limited / no discussion

Adequate given context

2 identification of deficiencies in available housing for the potential increased workface

OK Identified

3 identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Limited discussion Mostly adequate given context

d) Community Services and Public Finance

1 identification of deficiencies in community services and infrastructure during project preparation

Limited discussion Limited relevance

2 identification of shortfalls in transportation capacity due to either primary or secondary impacts

Discussed Limited relevance

3 identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impacts

Limited discussion Limited relevance

24




e) Transportation Limited relevance; as JUFMP trucks to be addressed in JUFMP AMDALs

1 assessment of proposed project's consistency with local and/or regional transportation plans

Limited discussion Limited relevance; as JUFMP trucks to be addressed in JUFMP AMDALs

2 evaluation of changes on LOS resulting from the proposed project


Limited relevance; as JUFMP trucks to be addressed in JUFMP AMDALs

3 evaluation of the effect of heavy vehicle traffic on affected pavement and bridges



4 description of mitigation measures to offset adverse impacts on structural integrity



f) Healthy and Safety

1 evaluation of whether construction, operation and maintenance activities present health and safety hazards to humans working or living at or near the project site

Limited discussion Limited relevance off-site;

2 discussion on potential effects of facility noise levels on workers and local communities

Limited discussion Limited relevance off-site;

3 analysis of potential long-term contaminant bio accumulative within the food chain

Limited discussion Requires addressing

4 identification of best mitigation measures to avoid or minimize adverse impact

Limited discussion ok

g) Environmental Equity

1 determination of the equity of changes in employment patterns attributable to site

Limited discussion Limited relevance as off-site effects will be minimal

2 determination of the equity of community structure changes caused by the project construction and operation


3 identification of the best mitigation measures to avoid for minimize adverse impacts


5 Cultural Resources

a) Identification of any historical or cultural resources in close proximity to the site following correspondence with appropriate authorities


Limited relevance as construction in a near-shore location

b) Discussion in the mitigation measures necessary to preserve item of archaeological, historical or cultural interest


Limited relevance as construction in a near-shore location

c) Determination of the extent to which construction, operation and maintenance activities disrupt the aesthetic or sensory attributes of the site


Some relevance but little significance

d) Determination of whether the facility components are designed with consideration given to human factors


Limited relevance as project focus on reclamation of essentially flat reclaimed area

25




MITIGATION MEASURES

1 Mitigation Measures

a) Description of mitigation measures for all significant impacts to both the natural and the human (socioeconomic) environments

Limited discussionbut mostly OK

Limited mitigation opportunities given context

b) Description of mitigation measures with adequate information to evaluate environmental consequence and residential (??residual) impacts

Limited discussion Impractical to determine quantitative residual effects

c) Identification to the best mitigation measures avoid or minimize potential impacts during all stages of the project, including sitting and design, facility operation and post facility closure

Limited but mostly adequate

Scope does not include operation (i.e. post-reclamation)and post facility closure

d) Support of the following types of mitigation measures, in the following decreasing order of preference:

avoidance or prevention minimization reduction or elimination over

time correction compensation

Limited but mostly adequate

By inference, identified measures follow this order.

e) Implementation plan (schedule) and criteria for performance for all mitigation measures

Some inferred Done

f) Responsible entity assigned to carrying out each mitigation measures

Mostly adequate Done

g) Measures are socially an culturally acceptable

Mostly adequate Mostly do not directly interact with local communities; but local communities have (sometimes unrealistic) expectations for employment etc

h) Adequate financial and non-financial resources to implement measures

Not specifically addressed

Mostly part of “good practice” engineering construction.

26

Appendix 2 Development of Ancol CDF and interaction with JUFMP project

Table A - 2: Development of Ancol CDF and interaction with JUFMP project (Schedule subject to periodic adjustments)

Prior2010

2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 2 0 1 5

Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

On-going consultation JUFMP and PT. PJA

Finalise detailed arrangements PMU/DKI Jakarta & PT. PJA

On-going periodic consultations

Formal end of PT. PJA - JUFMP disposal arrangements

Outer Confining Dike Construction

Facility Confinement

Continued maintenance

Period of filling with JUFMP Dredged Sediment

On-going filling

Final covering filled areas with sand

Final capping with laterite / red soil

JUFMP-deposited fill areas – Initial sampling / testing

JUFMP-deposited fill areas - Final sampling / testing

27

Appendix 3 Ancol integrated Environment Management and Monitoring Matrix

Table A - 3: Ancol CDF Supplementary EMP Matrix

The following matrix summarises the supplementary environmental and social management and monitoring for Ancol AMDAL site to provide more detail to safeguards measures to those identified in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL plus some additional safeguards. This complements but specifically does not override the Ancol Updated RPL / RKL formally approved by DKI BPLHD / AMDAL Commission.The following matrix summarises the supplementary environmental and social management and monitoring for Ancol AMDAL site to provide more detail to safeguards measures to those identified in the 2009 Ancol Updated RKL / RPL plus some additional safeguards. This complements but specifically does not override the Ancol Updated RPL / RKL formally approved by DKI BPLHD / AMDAL Commission.

Reference to main text items

Management MonitoringDescription Responsibility1 Cost1 Description Responsibility1 Cost1

3.2.1 Integration of

JUFMP and Ancol CDF activities

1 Provide Ancol construction progress updates and cooperate

with JUFMP reviews of the adequacy of confined facility for dredge material disposal.

PT. PJA PT. PJA;

PMU

Review Report PT. PJA and PMU PT. PJA;

PMU

2 Meet and coordinate activities PT. PJA; PMU

(assisted by the

SC)

PT. PJA;

PMU;

SC

Meeting Reports

verified as correct

PT. PJA and PMU PT. PJA;

PMU

3 Produce integrated detailed schedule, expanding on that of

Appendix 2SC SC

Schedules approved at

meetings


PMU

3.2.2 “Good practice” construction and

supervision

1 Draw up work plans and associated ESM Plans for all contractors working at Ancol CDF, tailored to scale of activity /

extent of contract

ACC ACC Ensure approved Work Plans / ESMP’s /

Monitor

implementation

PT. PJA; SC PT. PJA; SC

3.2.3 Sediment and other fill / cover material

1 Provide information of results and status of prior dredge sampling and testing at JUFMP sites to PT. PJA.

PMU / PIU (through the SC)

SC Ensure records collected and

maintained

PT. PJA; PMU

(DKI BPLHD kept

informed)

PT. PJA; PMU

2 Ensure that material (other than JUFMP dredge material)

delivered to Ancol CDF (fill and covering material) has appropriate environmental clearances.

PT. PJA (through

ACC)

PT. PJA;

ACC

Review and confirm

ACC-supplied certification

PT. PJA; SC PT. PJA;

SC

3 Implement program for post-disposal sampling and testing at

Ancol CDF of JUFMP sediment 18 months after start, and 1

month after completion of JUFMP dredged sludge disposal to

SC SC Laboratory analysis

reports


PMU

28

Reference to main text items

Management MonitoringDescription Responsibility1 Cost1 Description Responsibility1 Cost1

Ancol CDF.

3.2.4 Traffic

management

1 JUFMP projected sediment delivery truck numbers and times

to be advised to PT. PJA

SC (through

information from CC)

SC Records of information

being handed over. Monthly reports of past

movements (vs. prior

projections) and future

projections


PMU

2 Implement Ancol Updated RKL / RPL requirements,

especially in relation to orderly movement of vehicles to / from

Ancol CDF site and to vehicle washing before vehicles leave

Ancol CDF site

PT. PJA (some

through ACC)

PT. PJA Quarterly report PT. PJA; SC PT. PJA;

SC

Notes:1: ResponsibilityPT. PJA = PT. Pembangunan Ancol JayaACC = Ancol CDF Construction ContractorsPMU = Project Management Unit for JUFMPCC = Construction Contractor for JUFMPSC = Supervision Consultant for JUFMPDKI BPLHD = Environmental Management Agency of Jakarta Provincial

Government

world bank document · pdf filetable a - 3 : ancol cdf supplementary emp matrix ... rkl/rpl...

Documents