what explains differences and changes in consumption during economic development? agec 340:...
TRANSCRIPT
What explains differences and changes in consumption during economic development?
AGEC 340: International Economic Development
Course slides for week 3 (Jan. 26 & 28)
Consumption Patterns*
* If you’re following the textbook, this material is in Chapter 3.
Week 3.Determinants of Consumption
• What drives changes in consumption choices? – food consumption drives nutrition and health; – many other purchases also help drive development
• From an econ. point of view, we look separately at:– price effects (“this product is too expensive”)
demand curves price elasticity of demand
– income effects (“my income is too low”) income-consumption (Engel) curves income elasticity of demand
…and then consider lots of other factors as well!
The Demand Function
Lots of factors could influence quantities consumed;
mathematically, for any one good (Q1):Q1 = f (...)
What should be in the function? For example, for the quantity of wheat…
Qwheat = f (...)How about for the quantity of pork?
Qpork = f (...)…or potatoes?
Qpotatoes = f (...)
What does actual consumption look like?
(click through to source websites)
UK: The Bainton family of Cllingbourne Ducis
Food expenditure for one week: 155.54 British Pounds or $253.15
Mexico: The Casales family of Cuernavaca
Food expenditure for one week: 1,862.78 Mexican Pesos or $189.09
Mongolia: The Batsuuri family of Ulaanbaatar
Food expenditure for one week: 41,985.85 togrogs or $40.02
What explains differences and changes in consumption during economic development?
Now back to economics…
Week 3.Determinants of Consumption
• What drives changes in consumption choices? – food consumption drives nutrition and health; – many other purchases also help drive development
• From an econ. point of view, we look separately at:– price effects (“this product is too expensive”)
demand curves price elasticity of demand
– income effects (“my income is too low”) income-consumption (Engel) curves income elasticity of demand
…and then consider lots of other factors as well!
The Demand Function
Lots of factors could influence quantities consumed;
mathematically, for any one good (Q1):Q1 = f (...)
What should be in the function? For example, for the quantity of wheat…
Qwheat = f (...)How about for the quantity of pork?
Qpork = f (...)…or potatoes?
Qpotatoes = f (...)
The Demand Function• To make comparisons, we need to express this
mathematically, in terms of specific variables:
Qwheat = f (Pwheat , other prices, income, tastes & tech.)
• To show the demand function in two dimensions, we must fix the level of all the other variables
• For example:
Qwheat = f (Pwheat , other prices, income, tastes & tech.)orQwheat = f (Pwheat, other prices, income, tastes & tech.)
hold constant
hold constant
Holding all else constant, we can draw lines on a graph…
We will look at the two kinds of lines separately.First, demand curves:
Qwheat= f (Pwheat, other prices, income, tastes &
tech.)
Then, income-consumption (“Engel”) curvesQwheat = f (Pwheat, other prices, income, tastes &
tech.)
on horiz. axis on vertical axis
on vert. axis on horizontal axis
Our textbook picture: two demand curves
price changeis shown by
movement along the
curve
income changes shift the curve
slope = rise / run ≈ 100 / -500 = -0.2 units are $/ton per mt/yr
elasticity = %∆Q / %∆P = (∆Q/Q) / (∆P/P) ≈ 500/2500 / -100/50 = .2 /-2 = -0.1 = 10%
How can we measure these curves?
no units, so we can make comparisons!
Can we make comparisons that eliminate units?
We also need income elasticities of demand
but how big wasthis income change?
n = %∆Q / %∆I ≈ 1500/500 / 1000/250 = 3 / 4 = 0.75 =75%
…let’s say it was from 250 to 1000 $/yr :
again, no units so
we can make comparisons!
Demand follows fairly regular laws:
In response to price, note:--The “law of demand”: demand curves slope down
» price elasticities of demand are negative
( E < 0) » higher prices lead to lower quantity consumed
--Food demand is usually “price-inelastic”» quantity consumed changes less than price
( |E| < 1)» higher prices lead to more total expenditure
In response to income, note:--Food demand follows “Engel’s Law”: grows slower than income
» income elasticity of demand is often less than one
( n < 1) » higher income allows a lower share of it spent on food
--Staple food follows “Bennett’s Law”: grows slower than other food» income elasticities are especially low
( |nstaples| < |nothers| )
In terms of quantity consumed as income rises, “Engel Curves” look like this:
For starchy staples consumed as food, Bennett’s law applies: the income-consumption curve is really flat(e.g. as rice, porridge, bread etc.)
For all food, Engel’s law applies: the income-consumption curve gets flatter as income rises
deador dyingpeople
very low-incomepeople
middle-incomepeople
Income per capita (US$/year)we are here!
Describing the past allows us to forecast the future
From your homework exercise:population
growth (p)
income growth
(p)
income elasticity
(n)
demand growth
(d) x =+ ( )
But reality is more complicated! How has U.S. consumption actually changed
with our income growth?
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
Added Sugars
Added Fats
Cereals&Flour
Fruit&Veg.
Dairy
Meat, eggs, and nuts
Source: Calculated from the Loss-Adjusted Food Availability estimates of the USDA/Economic Research Service (www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FoodConsumption). Data last updated March 15, 2008.
Estimated total food consumption in the U.S.,1970-2006(calories per capita, by source)
In conclusion…
• To explain and predict changes in consumer demand, we need to consider:–price effects, using demand curves
as measured by the price elasticity of demand– income effects, using “Engel” curves
as measured by the income elasticity of demand–…and then consider many other factors that can
shift these curves over time or across countries.