welcome to the master plan public meeting · 28/02/1995 · • foster compatible development. how...

Mas

ter

Plan

Welcome to the Master Plan Public Meeting

Existing Airport Layout

What is a Master Plan?

Decision-making tool to guide development of the Airport.– Managementandoperatingpolicies

– Constructionofnewandexpandedfacilities

– Reserveareasforfutureairportdevelopment

Needs to consider:–Safetyandsecurity

–Maintainpracticalcosts

–Customerserviceandsatisfaction

–Maintainlandusesthatallowsforlogical incrementaldevelopment

Why prepare a Master Plan?

To provide an overall framework needed to guide orderly and strategic development of DIA.– Meetfutureneeds

•Additionalcapacity •Changingtravelneeds andcharacteristics

– Addressanticipated changesintheindustry

•Newtechnologies •Changingaircraftfleets •Securityrequirements •Environmentalpriorities •Energy (fuelsources/prices) •Economicchanges •Operationalchanges •Regulatorychanges

–Promotecohesiveand integrateddevelopmentin theairportenvirons

•Supportandmaximize economiccontributionto regionandstate •Fostercompatible development

How did we get here?

The opening of DIA has led to strong passenger traffic growth.

80,000,000

90,000,000

100,000,000

20,000,000

40,000,000

60,000,000

10,000,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

30,000,000

50,000,000

70,000,000

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

Pas

seng

ers

September 2003 Opening of sixth runway, Runway 16R/34L – the 16,000-foot runway is the longest commercial runway in North America

Early 1970s/1980s Congestion at Stapleton Airport leads to an expansion study for the existing airport and a site selection study for a new airport

September 1989 FAA Approval / Groundbreaking

February 28, 1995Airport Opening

50-Millionth Passenger



May 1988Adams County annexation

election agrees to annexation of land for Airport to the

City and County of Denver

April 1988Intergovernmental Agreement

signed by Adams County andthe City and County of Denver ORIGINAL DESIGN CAPACITY – 50 MILLION PASSENGERS

Base Forecast

May 1989 Denver approves referendum to build Denver International Airport

1994Continental Airlines announces dismantling of Denver hub and the new Frontier Airlines launches

2006 Southwest Airlines launches service from Denver

2001 Economic recession and attacks of September 11th

1986Original

Frontier Airlinesceases operations

STAPLETON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT DENVER INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT

Annual Passenger Traffic at Denver International Airport

How is DIA doing?Feature Summary

PassengerTraffic Fifth-busiestairportinNorthAmerica andoneofthehighestgrowthrates ofmajorairportsinpastfiveyears

Resiliency Airlinecapacityhasremainedstrong comparedtootherlargeairportsin challengingeconomicclimate

AirlineCosts Airlinecostshavebeenreducedby 31percentoverlastsevenyears

5%

0%

-5%

-

-

-

-

-

-

-10%

-15%

-20%

DENVER

Dallas/

Ft. Worth

Atlanta

New York/J

FK

San Fra

ncisco

Houston/B

ush

Los Angeles

P

hoenix

Chicago O’H

are

Las Vegas

-2.0% -2.4%-3.5% -3.9% -4.4%

-6.4%

-10.5% -10.9%

-15.1%

-9.4%

$18.00

$17.00

$10.00

$16.00

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

$15.00

$14.00

$12.00

19951996

19971998

19992000

20012002

20032004

20052006

20072008

(e

st)

$11.00

$13.00

$16.85

$16.07

$15.58

$14.27

$14.33

$12.86

$15.28 $15.20

$14.51

$13.01 $12.90

$11.41 $10.69

$10.59

DIA Cost per Enplaned Passenger

Percent Change in Scheduled Seat Departures January - June 2008 vs. January - June 2009

2008Rank Airport Passengers 1 Atlanta 90,039,280 2 ChicagoO’Hare 69,353,654 3 LosAngeles 59,542,151 4 Dallas/Ft.Worth 57,069,331 5 Denver 51,245,334 6 NewYork/JFK 47,790,485 7 LasVegas 44,074,707 8 Houston/Bush 41,698,832 9 Phoenix 39,890,896 10 SanFrancisco 37,234,592 11 Orlando 35,622,252 12 Newark 35,299,719 13 Detroit 35,144,841 14 Charlotte 34,732,584 15 Miami 34,063,531

Annual Passenger Traffic - US Rankings Calendar Year 2008

Sources: Airports Council International; OAG Schedule Tapes; and Denver International Airport Financial Statistics

Feature Summary

Domestic IncreaseinnonstopDestinations destinations

International NonstopservicetoLondonDestinations andFrankfurtandmultiple destinationsinCanada, Mexico,andCostaRica

Cargo Cargotonnagehas decreasedby50percent overlasteightyears

Noise Nonoiseviolations in2008

Regional $22.3billionperyearinEconomy employeesalariesand relatedeconomicactivity

Environmental IndustryleaderforFocus environmentalstewardship

550,000

600,000

650,000

400,000

450,000

500,000

19801981

19821983

19841985

19861987

19881989

19901991

19921993

19941995

19961997

19981999

20002001

20022003

20042005

20062007

2008

Airc

raft

Ope

ratio

ns (T

akeo

ffs &

Lan

ding

s)

Total Annual Aircraft Operations

NN

SS

EEWW

Saskatoon

Regina

Los AngelesOrange County

San Diego

SacramentoOakland

Palm SpringsOntario

Burbank

Santa BarbaraBakersfield

Montrose

Gunnison

AspenVail

GrandJunction

Steamboat Springs

MontereyFresno

El Paso

Reno

DENVER

Phoenix

Tucson

Las Vegas

ColoradoSprings

Vernal

Moab

Farmington

Salt Lake City

JacksonBoiseIdaho Falls

Redmond

Medford

Eugene

Portland

Seattle

Riverton

LaramieRock Springs

CortezTelluride

Cody

San FranciscoSan Jose

Casper

Cheyenne

BillingsBozeman

Great FallsMissoula

Kalispell

Helena

Spokane

Pasco

Kansas City

Dallas

LittleRock

GrandRapids

Washington-DCA

CedarRapids

New Orleans

Ft. Lauderdale

Miami

Tampa

Orlando

WichitaDodge City

Hays

Great BendGarden City

LiberalSpringfield

Lincoln

Moline

St Louis

Peoria

Milwaukee

Madison

Omaha

Rapid City

Minneapolis

PierreGilletteSheridan

Worland

ScottsbluffNorth Platte

Chadron

AlamosaPueblo

Amarillo

Bismarck

To Anchorage

DickinsonFargo

Traverse CityAppleton

Sioux Falls

Des Moines

KearneyMcCook

AustinHouston-IAH & HOU

San Antonio

Tulsa

MemphisOklahoma City

Fayetteville

New York-LGA

Philadelphia

New York-JFK

BaltimoreIAD

Chicago-ORD & MDW

Detroit

Columbus

CincinnatiDaytonIndianapolis

CharlotteKnoxville

Raleigh/Durham

Nashville

Huntsville

Birmingham

Cleveland Newark

PittsburghAkron/Canton

Boston

Ottawa

Atlanta

Albuquerque

Durango

To Honolulu,Lihue, Kona & Kahului

Note: Some markets served seasonally onlySource: Official Airline Guide (OAG) Schedule Tapes, June 2008

Vancouver

Edmonton

Los Cabos

Puerto Vallarta

Mazatlan

Mexico City

Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo

Toronto

Montreal

Winnipeg

Calgary

Cancun

San Jose

Cozumel

London/Heathrow

Frankfurt

Munich

Frankfurt

How is DIA doing?

Destinations Served Nonstop from Denver International AirportDomestic and International

What is the Master Plan process?

The master plan will be completed in the 1st quarter of 2010.

Inventory

TerminalAirfieldLandsideSupport facilities

Forecast

Demand scenariosProjections – Passengers – Aircraft operations – Cargo – General Aviation

FacilityRequirements

Assess capacity of existing facilitiesDetermine future facility needs

AlternativesConcepts

PreferredDevelopment

Plan

Refine based on feedback from stakeholdersFinal adjustment based on technical requirement

ImplementationPlan

Phasing of expansionBusiness planningEnvironmental overview

AirportLayout Plan

Capital improvement planFacility development decision treeFinancial plan

FAAApproval

FAAApproval

Outreach

Adv

isor

y C

omm

itte

e

Adv

isor

y C

omm

itte

e

Pub

lic M

eeti

ng

Adv

isor

y C

omm

itte

e

Adv

isor

y C

omm

itte

e

Pub

lic M

eeti

ng

Adv

isor

y C

omm

itte

e

AIRFIELD

TERMINAL LANDSIDE

SUPPORT

AlternativeConcepts

ScreenedConcepts

IntegratedConcepts

Shortlist IntegratedConcepts

PreferredAlternative

SCREENING

SCREENING

EVALUATION

INTEGRATION

Ongoing Public Outreach

We Are Here

How are the forecasts developed? AircraftForecast Scenario Passengers Operations Implications

Base Forecast +84% +77%

Scenario 1: IncreaseddemandforHighGrowth +108% +98% allfacilities

Morelandsidesupport(carrental, hotel,parking)Scenario 2: Moreterminalsupport(securityDecreasein checkpoints,ticketing)hubbing/connecting Reducedairfieldoperations activity +64% +60% Reducedgatedemands

RequiresfewergatesbutmoreScenario 3: concoursefrontageAnevolutiontolarger Feweraircraftoperationsaircraftfleet +84% +64% Airfieldenhancements

Scenario 4:Robustinternationalgrowth LargeraircraftasDenverevolvesintoan Internationalarrivalfacilitiesinternationalgateway +103% +90% Higherconnectionpercentage

Forecast base activity in 2030 using FAA, airline, historic and socioeconomic data

STEP 1

Developed a range of potential futurescenarios

STEP 2

Evaluate the implications of airport operations and passenger activity under different scenarios

STEP 3

Project passenger, aircraft, and cargo activity in 2030 for each forecast scenario

STEP 4

Airline Plans

FAA

HistoricalTrends

National AviationActivity & Trends

SocioeconomicData

AircraftFleet

FORECAST

Forecast of activity received FAA approval in 2007. The long-term activity growth trends serve as the basis for long range airport development planning and factors may influence actual activity growth (e.g. such as current economic conditions).

Growth (2008 to 2030)

What is forecasted between now and 2030?Significant future growth is anticipated at DIA.

Com

mer

cial

Pas

seng

ers

Commercial PassengersActivity Forecast Scenarios - Commercial Passengers

45,000

Cargo Existing 25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Cargo Forecast

General Aviation Existing

General Aviation Forecast

Other Air Taxi Existing

Military Existing

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

Year 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025 2027 2029

100,000,000

120,000,000

Scenario 4Scenario 1

40,000,000

60,000,000

80,000,000Scenario 2

Scenario 3Base Forecast

0

20,000,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Existing

High Growth (2006-2015)

Scenario 1

Scenario 3

Base Forecast (2006-2015)

Base Forecast

Scenario 2

Scenario 4

Existing

High Growth (2006-2015)

Scenario 1

Scenario 3

Base Forecast (2006-2015)

Base Forecast

Scenario 2

Scenario 4

Scheduled Aircraft ActivityActivity Forecast Scenarios - Commercial Operations(Takeoffs & Landings)

1,000,000

1,100,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

500,000

600,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035400,000

Scenario 4

Scenario 2Scenario 3

Base Forecast

Scenario 1

Com

mer

cial

Pas

seng

er O

pera

tion

s

Cargo Volume Forecasts

700,000

800,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

0

300,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

Carg

o Vo

lum

e (in

tons

)O

pera

tions

(Tak

eoffs

& L

andi

ngs)

200,000

100,000

Forecast Tonnage

Other Aircraft Activity

20,000

Other Air Taxi Forecast

Military Forecast

Historic Tonnage

Master plan activity forecasts guide a range of facility needs over a 25-year planning horizon. Actual development decisions will be based on achieving projected activity triggers rather than specific calendar milestones.

What are the airfield needs?

One runway by 2015 and two to three more by 2030.

7.01,400,000

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

Ope

rati

ons

(Tak

eoff

s &

Lan

ding

s)

Tota

l Num

ber

of R

unw

ays

Annual Capacity - Existing Airfield & Current Air Traffic Procedures789,000 Operations

Aver

age

Del

ay P

er O

pera

tion

(Min

utes

)

0.0

1.0

2.0

0

200,000

400,000

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

8

10

12

2

4

6

0 2006 2030 2030 2030 2030 2030 Existing Base Forecast Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Aircraft Delay CurveExisting Airfield (Base Forecast)

Runway Requirements

Note: The average delay per aircraft values reflect only those delays attributed to the runway component. Other operational delays, such as those associated with aircraft taxi operations, enroute airspace and/or gate availability are not included in these values.

Annual Capacity- Existing Airfield

Projected Annual Operations - Base Forecast

Historical Annual Operations

Average Aircraft DelayCurrent ATC Procedures

Evaluation Criteria

-Meets2030 requirements-Airfieldoperational efficiency-Lengthofadditional taxiwaydevelopment-Impactstoexisting facilities

Current AirfieldFuture Airfield (2030)Future Airfield (Beyond 2030)Annexation LineProperty Line

What are the terminal needs?

In the short term (2015), expansion of the existing facilities.– 20additionalgates

– Internationalpassengerprocessingandgates

– Passengertrainexpansion

– Baggagesystemupgrades

– Expansionofpassengersecurityscreening

– FasTracksrailstation

– On-sitehotelaccommodations

What are the terminal needs?

In the long term (2030), creation of new facilities.– Approximately100additionalgates

– Significantinternationalpassenger processingexpansion

– Terminalexpansionequivalenttotwoorthreeadditional modules(existingterminalconsistsofthreemodules)

– Passengertrainandbaggagesystemexpansions

Gate Requirements

Terminal Requirements

250

300

7.0

8.0

100

150

200

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Mai

nlin

e Eq

uiva

lent

Gat

es R

equi

red

Mile

s of

Gat

e Fr

onta

ge

0

50

0.0

1.0

Forecast Demand Scenarios

2.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Gate Frontage Required

Gate Frontage AvailableBuild-out of Concourses A, B, C

Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

Terminal Area Required

Number of Terminal Modules

6

7

4,000,000

4,500,000

3

4

5

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Num

ber

of T

erm

inal

Mod

ules

Term

inal

Are

a (s

quar

e fe

et)

0

2

0

1,000,000


1,500,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

500,0001

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Gate Requirements

Terminal Requirements

250

300

7.0

8.0

100

150

200

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

Mai

nlin

e Eq

uiva

lent

Gat

es R

equi

red

Mile

s of

Gat

e Fr

onta

ge

0

50

0.0

1.0


2.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Gate Frontage Required

Gate Frontage AvailableBuild-out of Concourses A, B, C

Mainline Equivalent Gates Required

Terminal Area Required

Number of Terminal Modules

6

7

4,000,000

4,500,000

3

4

5

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

Num

ber

of T

erm

inal

Mod

ules

Term

inal

Are

a (s

quar

e fe

et)

0

2

0

1,000,000


1,500,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

500,0001

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Existing Terminal Area

CONCOURSE C

CONCOURSE B

CONCOURSE A

TERMINAL

MODULE 1

MODULE 2

MODULE 3

What are the concepts for terminal expansion?

Current Terminal/ConcoursesFuture Terminal &Concourse Expansion (2030)Future Terminal &Concourse Expansion (Beyond 2030)

Existing Template Expansion Concept

East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept

South Terminal Concept

Evaluation Criteria

-Meets2030 requirements-Flexibilityto meetdemands beyond2030-Passenger convenience-Meetssecurity requirements

What are the landside needs?

Expansion of all facilities over the planning horizon.– Roadways– Parking– RentalCar– TerminalCurbside– CommercialVehicleFacilities

Public Parking Requirements

700

800

90,000

100,000

400

500

600

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Acr

es

0

300

0

30,000


40,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Spaces

Existing

Acres2006

Existing2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

20,000

10,000 100

200

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Spac

es

Employee Parking Requirements

90

10014,000

60

70

80

8,000

10,000

12,000

Acr

es

0

50

0


6,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Spaces

Existing

Acres2006

Existing2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

4,000

2,000

30

40

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Spac

es20

10

Rental Car Facility Requirements250

200

0


150

-

-

-

-

-

-

100

50

Acr

es

Requirements at 85% Utilization

Existing

Requirements at 100 % Utilization

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Public Parking Requirements

700

800

90,000

100,000

400

500

600

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Acr

es

0

300

0

30,000


40,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Spaces

Existing

Acres2006

Existing2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

20,000

10,000 100

200

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Spac

es

Employee Parking Requirements

90

10014,000

60

70

80

8,000

10,000

12,000

Acr

es

0

50

0


6,000

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Spaces

Existing

Acres2006

Existing2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

4,000

2,000

30

40

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

Spac

es

20

10

Rental Car Facility Requirements250

200

0


150

-

-

-

-

-

-

100

50

Acr

es

Requirements at 85% Utilization

Existing

Requirements at 100 % Utilization

2006 Existing

2015 Base

Forecast

2020 Base

Forecast

2025 Base

Forecast

2030 Base

Forecast

2030 Scenario 1

2030 Scenario 2

2030 Scenario 3

2030 Scenario 4

What are the concepts for landside expansion?

Evaluation Criteria

-Abilityto accommodate 2030demands-Locationoffacilities-Efficientland utilization

FasTracks Rail AlignmentFuture RoadwaysAnnexation LineProperty Line

Public ParkingRental Car FacilitiesEmployee ParkingLandside People MoverGround Transportation Center

Existing Template Expansion Concept

East/West Terminal and Concourse Concept

South Terminal Concept

What are the support facility needs?

Expansion of most facilitiesrequired over the planning horizon.

80

100

1202006 Existing20152030

20

40

60

Acre

s

0

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Belly F

reight

All-Carg

o

General A

viatio

n

Airlin

e Main

tenance

Airlin

e GSE

Consolid

ated M

ateria

l Handlin

g

Airport

Mainte

nance

Airport

Operatio

ns

Airlin

e Adm

inist

ratio

n

Flight K

itchens

Support Facilities Requirements

Evaluation Criteria

-Meets2030 requirements-Regionalaccess-Proximityto associatedfacilities-Utilities/other infrastructure-Expandability

Support Facilities AlternativesCurrent AirfieldFuture Airfield (2030)Future Airfield (Beyond (2030)Existing Support FacilitiesFuture Areas for Support FacilitiesAnnexation LineProperty Line

What are the next steps?

Public and Stakeholder Outreach– Additionaladvisory committeemeetings

– Secondpublicmeetingon preferreddevelopmentplan (mid-summer2009)

– FAAreviewandapproval ofairportlayoutplan (early2010)

Deputy Manager

Manager of Aviation

Preparation of Airport Layout Plan

AIRFIELD

TERMINAL LANDSIDE

SUPPORT

AlternativeConcepts

ScreenedConcepts

IntegratedConcepts

Shortlist IntegratedConcepts

PreferredAlternative Note: No government affairs

No customer service No community affairs

Research & Planning

Marketing

SCREENING

SCREENING

EVALUATION

INTEGRATION

We Are Here

Preparation of Airport Layout Plan

How can you provide input?

Input from the public is encouraged and welcomed.– Filloutacommentcard

– Visitwww.flydenver.com/masterplan

– [email protected]

Mas

ter

Plan

welcome to the master plan public meeting · 28/02/1995 · • foster compatible development. how...

Documents