weekly strategic plan 11262012

7/28/2019 Weekly Strategic Plan 11262012

1/9

Liquidity Cycle

THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF INFINIUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LCC AND ITS EMPLOYEES TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND CONTAINS OR MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this communicati on is not the intended recemployee or agent responsible for delivering to the intended recipient), you are hereby notied that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately inform Innium Capital Management, LLC and then disregard and delete this communication. Do nretain any copy of this communication.

Thanksgiving week has now passed and I am reluctant to draw many conclusions from such a low volume, low participation market. So I will present

some longer time frame charts as a tool to remind us where different markets are trading relative to their history. I will cut down on some of the

volatility coverage this week also. This is usually the time of year when the silly season for trading begins. Large trading operations begin to close

down for the year and traders attend to career risk in the form of capturing the prots they have made, or if they have not made any they turn to

polishing resumes. Congress was also on recess which typically leads to better equity performance. All that said, let us hope that the strong price

move up in the stock market is not just a low volume mirage.

A very impressive gain until one checks the facts and nds the 20 times gain of the market from 1964 when it was at 70 to 1400 at the highs a

saw the money supply grow from 370 to 10221 or 27 times. There is the reason the middle class is falling behind. The government is stealin

wealth through debasement of the currency. This is the worlds second oldest profession and in the end you have had the same thing done to

in the rst.

The US equity market greeted the second Obama term by promptly walking over the tax anticipation cliff. The likelihood of carried interest, cap

gains, and dividend hikes argued for the prudent harvesting of open gains in 2012.

Congenial behavior by Republican and Democratic legislators seemed to relieve some of the pressure market participants had been feeling. The

rhetoric should heat up again during the next two weeks and could roil markets once more. Unless the backroom negotiators have realized they all

have political risk in this scal cliff scenario. These people created the scal cliff by piling deadlines on top of one another just after the election. They

can just as easily un-pile the deadlines by changing a few expiration dates. This would not solve the problems we face, but it would diffuse the bad

press. That is a worthy goal for an elected legislator.

So my advice is prepare to have some serious smoke blown up the old fundament. Remember, If you assume that politicians are liars, and thieves,

you do your best forecasting.

This next chart is a one year chart of the Liquidity Cycle Indicator with overlays of the ICM Global Growth Expectations, the SPXIndex, and the MSCI

World Index. After being weak since mid-September the LCI and the Growth indicators both bottomed in late October as allocators begin to shift

some money around. Both indicators have rallied since then even when the equity indices fell post election. Last week in a low volume environment

the equities rallied on apparent risk on sentiment. This plurality is positive though early and unproven. I am thus beginning to lean to bullishness as I

expect news about more European liquidity being made available, along with a more aggressive effort to create ination in Japan and of course the

already announced Fed policy of serial liquidity injection. A recipe for money illusion and stock market price gains.

Following are some longer term Index charts with little additional comment. A sort of better to be silent and thought a fool, than to comment and

remove all doubt presentation.


2/9


Table from Bespoke Investment


3/9


Developed Country Market Rankings

These results are in terms of return to a dollar based investor and several things are worth noticing. A large number of indices are trending up now. The

leaders are New Zealand, Greece and Austria, which imply that the currency moves may have played a role as well as the asymmetry of percentage

returns when markets have fallen a long way. (Think Greece) A market that falls from 1000 to 100 then bounces to 200 has now is now up 100% from

the low.

Developing and Emerging Market Rankings

There is a nice mix of up and down trends in this list. Most of Latin America is trailing except Mexico which has done well. The leaders are

Philippines, and Poland. These are probably not the rst names that come to mind when most of us think of buying stocks. Beware the obviou

SECTORS


4/9


Here are some more longer-term charts in Fixed Income, Commodities, and Currencies


5/9THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF INFINIUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LCC AND ITS EMPLOYEES TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND CONTAINS OR MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this communicati on is not the intended recemployee or agent responsible for delivering to the intended recipient), you are hereby notied that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately inform Innium Capital Management, LLC and then disregard and delete this communication. Do nretain any copy of this communication.

Corn and Wheat long term charts are reasonably similar to the Soy chart.

Note that taking the Yen chart back to the early 70s nds the level at 350 to the dollar.

The next chart is the M2 money supply overlaid with the Spot price of Gold. I personally do not consider it a coincidence that they have ge

moved similar amounts.


6/9THIS COMMUNICATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF INFINIUM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LCC AND ITS EMPLOYEES TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND CONTAINS OR MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this communicati on is not the intended recemployee or agent responsible for delivering to the intended recipient), you are hereby notied that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately inform Innium Capital Management, LLC and then disregard and delete this communication. Do nretain any copy of this communication.

Summary of Implied to Realized Volatilities as of Friday


7/9


Articles & Commentary

Mebane Faber posts this chart of the distribution of asset allocations globally as of 2011.

How Federal largesse traps the poor

from Scott Grannis

Welfare, food stamps, the earned income tax credit, and healthcare insurance subsidies are all designed to help the poor and even much of th

middle class. But the unintended consequence of these income assistance programs (i.e., transfer payments) is that they make it much harde

people to work their way out of poverty. Thats because all that money being handed out has to be t aken away as people climb the income lad

and that has the effect of increasing marginal tax rates.

This chart, courtesy of the Congressional Budget Ofce, comes from a new study of effective federal marginal tax rates. The top range of eac

the bars is the effective marginal tax rate faced by some people in various income groups covering 80% of all taxpayers. Note that some of th

making 100-149% of the poverty rate face marginal tax rates of as high as 60%!! If someone at the poverty line wants to work harder, he or sh

only be able to keep 40 cents of each additional dollar earned.
http://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2012/11/how-federal-largesse-traps-poor.htmlhttp://scottgrannis.blogspot.com/2012/11/how-federal-largesse-traps-poor.html


8/9


On average, the vast majority of workers have effective marginal tax rates of 30%. As Greg Mankiw notes, In 2014, after various temporary tax

provisions have expired and the newly passed health insurance subsidies go into effect, the average effective marginal tax rate will rise to 35

percent. That is almost as much as the marginal tax rates of the rich.

A Minimum Tax for the Wealthy

By WARREN E. BUFFETT

SUPPOSE that an investor you admire and trust comes to you with an investment idea. This is a good one, he says enthusiastically. Im in it

I think you should be, too.

Would your reply possibly be this? Well, it all depends on what my tax rate will be on the gain youre saying were going to make. If the taxes

too high, I would rather leave the money in my savings account, earning a quarter of 1 percent. Only in Grover Norquists imagination does s

response exist.

Between 1951 and 1954, when the capital gains rate was 25 percent and marginal rates on dividends reached 91 percent in extreme cases, I

securities and did pretty well. In the years from 1956 to 1969, the top marginal rate fell modestly, but was still a lofty 70 percent and the tax

rate on capital gains inched up to 27.5 percent. I was managing funds for investors then. Never did anyone mention taxes as a reason to forgo

investment opportunity that I offered.

Under those burdensome rates, moreover, both employment and the gross domestic product (a measure of the nations economic output) incr

at a rapid clip. The middle class and the rich alike gained ground.

So lets forget about the rich and ultrarich going on strike and stufng their ample funds under their mattresses if gasp capital gains rates

ordinary income rates are increased. The ultrarich, including me, will forever pursue investment opportunities.

And, wow, do we have plenty to invest. The Forbes 400, the wealthiest individuals in America, hit a new group record for wealth this year: $1.7

trillion. Thats more than ve times the $300 billion total in 1992. In recent years, my gang has been leaving the middle class in the dust.

A huge tail wind from tax cuts has pushed us along. In 1992, the tax paid by the 400 highest incomes in the United States (a different universe

the Forbes list) averaged 26.4 percent of adjusted gross income. In 2009, the most recent year reported, the rate was 19.9 percent. Its nice to

friends in high places.

The groups average income in 2009 was $202 million which works out to a wage of $97,000 per hour, based on a 40-hour workweek. (Im

assuming theyre paid during lunch hours.) Yet more than a quarter of these ultrawealthy paid less than 15 percent of their take in combined fe

income and payroll taxes. Half of this crew paid less than 20 percent. And brace yourself a few actually paid nothing.

This outrage points to the necessity for more than a simple revision in upper-end tax rates, though thats the place to start. I support President

Obamas proposal to eliminate the Bush tax cuts for high-income taxpayers. However, I prefer a cutoff point somewhat above $250,000 ma

$500,000 or so.

Additionally, we need Congress, right now, to enact a minimum tax on high incomes. I would suggest 30 percent of taxable income between $

million and $10 million, and 35 percent on amounts above that. A plain and simple rule like that will block the efforts of lobbyists, lawyers and

contribution-hungry legislators to keep the ultrarich paying rates well below those incurred by people with income just a tiny fraction of ours. O

minimum tax on very high incomes will prevent the stated tax rate from being eviscerated by these warriors for the wealthy.

Above all, we should not postpone these changes in the name of reforming the tax code. True, changes are badly needed. We need to get r

arrangements like carried interest that enable income from labor to be magically converted into capital gains. And its sickening that a Cayma

Islands mail drop can be central to tax maneuvering by wealthy individuals and corporations.

But the reform of such complexities should not promote delay in our correcting simple and expensive inequities. We cant let those who want t

protect the privileged get away with insisting that we do nothing until we can do everything.

Our governments goal should be to bring in revenues of 18.5 percent of G.D.P. and spend about 21 percent of G.D.P. levels that have bee

attained over extended periods in the past and can clearly be reached again. As the math makes clear, this wont stem our budget decits; in f

it will continue them. But assuming even conservative projections about ination and economic growth, this ratio of revenue to spending will ke

Americas debt stable in relation to the countrys economic output.

In the last scal year, we were far away from this scal balance bringing in 15.5 percent of G.D.P. in revenue and spending 22.4 percent.

Correcting our course will require major concessions by both Republicans and Democrats.

All of America is waiting for Congress to offer a realistic and concrete plan for getting back to this scally sound path. Nothing less is acceptab

In the meantime, maybe youll run into someone with a terric investment idea, who wont go forward with it because of t he tax he would owe w

it succeeds. Send him my way. Let me unburden him.

Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.

Article in New York Times

As the chart above shows, average tax rates for the poor are relatively low, with 80% of taxpayers in 2007 paying an effective average tax rate of

between 4% and 17%. We do indeed have a very progressive tax code if all you look at are average tax rates (i.e., total taxes divided by income).

But its marginal tax rates, which have the greatest impact on incentives, and marginal tax rates are much higher than average rates under a

progressive tax system loaded with subsidies. On a marginal basis, our income tax is actually regressivethe poor face marginal tax rates that are

much higher than those faced by the rich.

Although the CBO study is an eye-opener, the reality for some people could be even worse. In a post last year, I quoted Daniel Kesslers WSJ

article, in which he describes the punitive marginal tax rates (higher than 100%!) that will be faced by some families if ObamaCare is implemented:

Starting in 2014, subsidies will be available to families with incomes between 134% and 400% of the federal poverty line. For example, a family of

four headed by a 55-year-old earning $31,389 in 2014 dollars (134% of the federal poverty line) in a high-cost area will get a subsidy of $22,740. A

similar family earning $93,699 (400% of poverty) gets a subsidy of $14,799.But a family earning $1 more$93,700gets no subsidy. Consider a wife in a family with $90,000 in income. If she were to earn an additional

$3,700, her family would lose the insurance subsidy and be more than $10,000 poorer.

There is no getting around it: a highly progressive tax system that relies on subsidies and other income assistance for the poor and even upper-

middle income earners will inevitably yield very high marginal tax rates. This makes climbing the income ladder more difcult, and effectively traps

many of the poor. Why work harder if you can only keep a fraction of the extra income?

Greg Mankiw also provides a reasonable solution:

... we could repeal all these taxes and transfer programs, replace them with a at tax along with a universal lump-sum grant, and achieve

approximately the same overall degree of progressivity.

Thanks to Calaa Beach Pundit

From David Kotok on Hayek quoting de Toqueville

Translation (from Hayek, The Road to Serfdom): Democracy extends the sphere of i ndividual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy

attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have

nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equalityin restraint and servitude.


9/9


Chinese warning

Hopes for an early recovery in the global economy may be overoptimistic, according to a well-regarded economic strategist who says the

expansion of Chinas reserves, which has been an engine of global economic growth, is about to come to a shuddering halt.

The above chart shows how the growth of Chinese reserves has decelerated dramatically over the last ve years and is now close to zero.

The chart was put together by Russell Napier, a consultant with stockbroker CLSA Asia-Pacic Markets, and the author of a course at Edinburgh

Business School called a Practical History of the Financial Markets.

Napier said of the graph: It is the most important chart in the world. The growth in Chinese reserves has determined all the key developments in

nancial markets in the last two decades. It printed lots of currency and articially depressed the US yield curve. It has been the cornerstone of

global growth, and now its over.

The last time the Chinese reserve growth rate was below 10% was at the end of the 1990s, just before the bursting of the technology stock market

bubble and a recession. The recovery in the growth rate from 2001 onwards was followed by the economic boom of the last decade. The growth

rate turned down decisively in 2007, just before the onset of the nancial crisis.

Chinas reserves have come from a trading surplus, and the Chinese authorities have used the money to buy US Treasury bonds. The nance that

China supplied to the US helped fuel economic growth in that country and the rest of the world. EFinancial News

Bruce Lawrence November 26, 2012
http://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2012-11-22/slowdown-in-chinese-reserve-growth-heralds-global-downturnhttp://www.efinancialnews.com/story/2012-11-22/slowdown-in-chinese-reserve-growth-heralds-global-downturn

weekly strategic plan 11262012

Documents