week # 2 mr chapter 2

29
Week # 2 MR Chapter 2 Tutorial #2 MR # 2.1, 2.4, 2.8. To be discussed on Jan. 25, 2017. By either volunteer or class list. MARTIN RHODES (2008) Introduction to Particle Technology , 2nd Edition. Publisher John Wiley & Son, Chichester, West Sussex, England.

Upload: bryson

Post on 25-Feb-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Tutorial #2 MR # 2.1, 2.4, 2.8. To be discussed on Jan. 29, 2014. By either volunteer or class list. Week # 2 MR Chapter 2. MARTIN RHODES (2008) Introduction to Particle Technology , 2nd Edition. Publisher John Wiley & Son, Chichester, West Sussex, England. For a sphere. Stoke’s law. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Week # 2MR Chapter 2

• Tutorial #2• MR # 2.1, 2.4, 2.8.

• To be discussed on Jan. 25, 2017.

• By either volunteer or class list.

MARTIN RHODES (2008) Introduction to Particle Technology , 2nd Edition. Publisher John Wiley & Son, Chichester, West Sussex, England.

Page 2: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Motion of solid particles in a fluid

For a sphere

Stoke’s law

Page 3: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Standard drag curve for motion of a sphere in a fluid

Page 4: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Reynolds number ranges for single particle drag coefficient correlations

At higher relative velocity, the inertia of fluid begins to dominate.

Four regions are identified: Stoke’s law, intermediate, newton’s law, boundary layer separation.

Table 2.1 (Schiller and Naumann (1933) : Accuracy around 7%.

Page 5: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Single Particle Terminal Velocity

Page 6: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Special Cases

• Newton’s law region:12( )

1.74 p fT

f

x gU

Intermediate region:

0.71.1 0.29 0.43, , ,T p f fU x

Page 7: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

To calculate UT and x

• (a) To calculate UT, for a given size x,

• (b) To calculate size x, for a given UT,

32

2

( )4Re3

f p fD

x gC

Independent of UT

3 2

( )4Re 3

P fD

P T f

gCU

Independent of size x

Page 8: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Particles falling under gravity through a fluid

Method for estimating terminal velocity for a given size of particle and vice versa

Page 9: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Non-spherical particles

Drag coefficient CD versus Reynolds number ReP for particles of sphericity ranging from 0.125 to 1.0

Page 10: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Effect of boundaries on terminal velocity

Sand particles falling from rest in air (particle density, 2600 kg/m3)

When a particle is falling through a fluid in the presence of a solid boundary the terminalVelocity reached by the particle is less than that for an infinite fluid.

Following Francis (1933), wall factor ( )/w Df U U

Page 11: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 12: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Limiting particle size for Stoke’s law in water

Page 13: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

Limiting particle size for Stoke’s law in air

Page 14: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

850

Page 15: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 16: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 17: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 18: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 19: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 20: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 21: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 22: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 23: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 24: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 25: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2

• Where the plotted line intersects the standard drag curve for a sphere ( = 1), Rep = 130.

• The diameter can be calculated from:

Re 130 f v TP

x U

Hence sphere diameter, xv = 619 m.

• For a cube having the same terminal velocity under the same conditions, the same CD vesus Rep relationship applies, only the standard drag curve is that for a cube( = 0.806)

Page 26: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 27: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 28: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2
Page 29: Week # 2 MR Chapter 2