week 2: - edge.rit.eduedge.rit.edu/content/p17483/public/msd i meeting minutes.docx · web...
TRANSCRIPT
ContentsWeek 2:......................................................................................................................................................................................2
Week 4.......................................................................................................................................................................................4
Week 5.......................................................................................................................................................................................7
Week 6.....................................................................................................................................................................................10
Week 8:....................................................................................................................................................................................11
Week 9:....................................................................................................................................................................................12
Week 10:..................................................................................................................................................................................13
Week 11...................................................................................................................................................................................14
Week 12...................................................................................................................................................................................16
Week 13:..................................................................................................................................................................................18
Week 14:..................................................................................................................................................................................19
Week 15:..................................................................................................................................................................................20
1
Week 2:Actions Completed:
Discussed Team Values and Norms Compared group member’s thoughts to the pre-provided template in Edge
Unsatisfactory
Needs Improvement Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Punctual Keep Keep Keep Keep
Accountable (Text from Thorough) + Team member does not take other project aspects into account, only focuses on the vision of their own work.
(Text from Thorough) + Team member’s work is somewhat complete and documented.
(Text from Thorough) + Team member came prepared to all meetings, with a good effort on completed work.
(Text from Thorough) + Team member contributes useful work to the forward progress of the project. Takes initiative to relate current work to future steps of the project.
Professional/ Ethical
Keep Keep Keep Keep
Committed Keep Keep Keep Keep
Communication
Does not respond to acknowledge communication from the rest of the group, whether email or group messaging responses. Does not communicate progress to the group on a timely basis.
Does not provide constructive feedback, but communicates regularly. Communicates progress to the group, but in on an untimely schedule.
Uses group members preferred methods of communication when communicating to the member(s). Provides constructive feedback. Communicates progress regularly.
Concise but effective communication over text or GroupMe. Uses alternative methods (email, in-person) for longer or more important topics. Seeks and provides constructive feedback. Communicates progress regularly.
2
Customer Requirements:
Mobile, or important/easily damaged components can be stored during periods of non-use or severe weather conditions.
Made of materials obtainable in Haiti.
Thursday (9-1)
Mock definition review on Tuesday We decided that we would prefer to use a Powerpoint rather than Edge as the medium
3
Week 49/13, Tuesday
Results of Definition Review Recap with John:o Change ROI to payback periodo Stakeholders: Add people who will maintain the system
In class:o Combined the functional decomposition charts that we completed for homework
Action Items: o Bring System level design concepts to class Thursday. Be prepared to discuss the ideas
9/15, ThursdaySystem-Level Concepts:
Design Concept
Description Owner
Tarp tent Tent-type design with double layer tarp (landscaping tarp, etc.) walls packed with insulation (grass, etc.). Frame made of wood, air intake holes along bottom of side walls, exhaust at top. Trays stacked inside.
Caly
Sand Dried Air Crop Dryer
Classic wood design with drawers and mesh, the regular collector (Dr. Steven’s method), with supply air passing over sand to dehumidify allowing for more moisture removal.
Matt
GHG collector w/double Chimney
Classic wood design with cupboard like doors to cover the racks, which use hooks (resembling the meat hook idea) to hold fruit. Collector takes advantage of greenhouse effect using a film to form top of the chamber and the black landscaping material w/holes forming the base. Two smaller chimneys to allow for more air flow.
Matt
Stacked Collector (double entry)
Two hot air entries so that hot air is directed to the lower and upper regions of the chamber separately.
Kaleigh
Function/Subsystem Design Concepts:Function Design Concept Description Owner
Increase flow Wind powered fan A fan that sits in the chimney connected directly to a shaft that goes up chimney and is affixed
Matt
Decrease Humidity
Desiccants Having a substance can help buffer humidity entering the drying chamber can allow air to carry more moisture
Matt
Increase fruit storage
Zig zag the racks The rack below the first will be on the opposite wall allowing for closer stacking of the racks. Allows us to conserve space.
Matt
Trap more heat
Roofing tiles Somehow use roofing tiles to absorb sun’s heat and direct that heat into the chamber
Kaleigh
Insulate chamber
Natural Walls Box designed out of clay/mud/grassy mixture. Or something like a clay kiln that could trap heat better.
Kaleigh
Maximize drying area of
Tray made of natural materials
Make the drying tray out of bamboo or burlap. These likely wouldn’t be as effective as mesh, but are more readily available
Kelsey
4
fruit in Haiti
Selection Criteria:
1. Maintenance requirements (part replacement)2. Simple assembly (<1hr)3. Cohesive subsystems4. Affordability of materials5. Guided customer support6. Material obtainability7. Ease of modeling process8. New concept (changes from grad research)9. Capacity for fruit10. Ability to seal from air loss11. Mobility (at least some components)12. Weather resistance of materials13. Ease of cleaning14. Reproducibility of materials and construction
Available Material List:
Material Additional Information
Gravel bags filled with crushed limestone
(used for foundation support). Bags are made of tarps available and sewn into necessary shapes by local seamstresses.
Straw bales Formed of rice straw, which is plentiful. Source said 80% of rice straw grown in Haiti is wasted.
Clay Used in clay plaster
Bamboo Made into trusses for building, seen as underutilized as a construction material recently. Current campaign to increase use
Pallets Also building material
Corrugated steel sheets Commonly available and durable
Aluminum Foil http://www.solarcooker-at-cantinawest.com/introducing-solar-cooking-in-haiti-for-aae.html
Concrete Blocks http://www.buildchange.org/locations/haiti/
Sisal Fiber https://www.quora.com/What-building-materials-are-widely-available-in-Haiti
Earthquake Rubble-gravel
http://www.builderswithoutborders.org/HAITI/BWB_HaitiStrawbaleH2.pdf
Rebar Sarah Brownell
5
___________________________________________________________________________
Action Items for Tuesday, 9/20 List of possible construction materials (with proof they are obtainable in Haiti). Any additional materials
need to be shown they can be easily imported.o Try to find any material specifications for these, screenshot data sheets, etc.
Oven dry bananas as an experimento Caly has a food scale
Look into food safety requirements. Upload info to Research folder. Update Edge Expand on Gantt chart
6
Week 59/20: Tuesday
In class activity: Caly - contact Dr. Stevens to get the matlab model and arrange meeting for explanation. Look into possibility of hair dryer for testing Identify where we can make improvements in design Put together Pugh chart for designs
Questions for Dr. Steven’s Why did Stevens test with the 3 top racks?
o Didn’t have enough bananas to fill all of it, so he used the top so the hot air would have not have so far to travel before exiting with the removed moisture
How does he think it would change using bottom 3? Could his current model be adapted to model a shorter oven? (3 or 5 racks) Why did he choose current oven size? (8 racks) Opinions on double chamber and greenhouse idea?
o We need a tall oven, therefore, the shorter design of the double oven probably won’t work.
9/22 Thursday:
Action Items: Gantt chart 3 week individual plans for edge Start presentation draft
____________________________________________________________________________
9/22: Thursday
Team Member’s Individual 3 Week PlansName Items
Caly Review existing Matlab model with Dr. Stevens Identify limitations of current model Modify model to suit our modeling needs (as best possible) Concept generation of additional heating elements in device
Kelsey Research materials found in Haiti Create Gantt chart for the semester Observe testing of Dr. Steven’s prototype Brainstorm alternative materials for subsystems of device
Kaleigh Learn more about the system through observation of the current model by working with the graduate student studying the system.
Identify possible options for the different subsystems through functional decomposition. Material identification and feasibility with our designs
Matt Develop concepts for solar collector models that are based on what we have learned so far from the Problem Definition Review.
Analyze the Feasibility of the Greenhouse model
7
Consider materials
Narrowing down Design Scope: Components of Design
1. Actual oven housing - similar design/structure, but with new materials2. Experiment with design of collector
a. Possibility for different air intake way?3. Potential center section for additional air heating and/or dehumidifying4. Chimney to heat exhausting air to keep flow moving frame with black tarp wrapped, greenhouse
Division of Subsystem Design Ideas:
Oven Housing:
Solar Collector:
Center Heater/Dehumidifier:
Chimney:
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Morph Chart to Pugh Chart Idea Line-up:
1. Tent:1. Fabric trays2. Removable trays3. Intake holes on bottom4. No door5. Unit self heats6. Teepee style exhaust
2. Greenhouse1. Double door2. Removable trays3. Mesh4. Greenhouse collector5. Holes on bottom of collector for intake6. Steven’s attachment for supplied air7. Double chimney
3. Sand1. Single door2. Removable trays3. Mesh trays4. Intake holes on top5. Dehumidify air passing over sand/secondary heating6. Short chimney
4. Double Oven1. Single door2. Mesh racks3. Steven’s model x24. Holes on top for intake
8
5. Steven’s attachment for supply air6. Double chimney
____________________________________________________________________________
Action Items for Tuesday, 9/27:
Brainstorm ideas for the 4 defined subsystems. Put ideas either in log book or area above. Finish 3 week plan in section above for Edge. Start planning next 3 week plan.
9
Week 69/27: Tuesday
Agenda: Collect ideas for subsystem designs Update risk assessment for Design Review presentation Testing plan What needs added to be uploaded to Edge?
In Class Activity:
Subsystem Design Ideas: Collector:
o Double tarp Center Heater:
o Rebar wrapped with tarp, angled slightly up between collector and oveno Tray filled with sand for dehumidifying, covered by metal or tarp on both sides and top
Oven:o Metal sheets with plywood as insulation on insideo Metal outside frame with tarp lining. Fill space in between with straw and/or grass as insulation.
Chimney:o Rebar rectangle with long side facing collector side. Walls made of tarp wrapped around.
Wisdom from John: Tell the audience at the beginning of the review exactly what you will need help with.
_____________________________________________________________________________
9/29: Thursday
Agenda: Summary of definition review Develop individual three week plans Develop Collector design that we want to test. Create Mini Gantt Chart Risk Identification Matt - finish design sketches
Matt: Concept and Architecture Development- Look at Dr. Steven’s models Look at heat transfer properties for the materials we have in mind.
Kaleigh Find some Haiti weather data that can be used in the model
Action Items for Tuesday 10/4:
3 week plans for next phase Prepare discussion questions for the review.
10
Week 8:Thursday, 10-13:During Class:
Caly, Louie, and Matt attempted a heat transfer rough analysis of collector designs Reference P15484 for example of feasibility analysis
Results: Meetings with Dr. Steven’s should be designed and executed to be efficient and productive. Go in with organized plan. Plan on testing the double tarp next Thursday 10/20/16:
John’s Advice: Remember that labor is cheap and may be acceptable to use human resources as some part of
component. Don't be worried about asking stupid questions, it stifles your creativity when you do that.
Kaleigh attended this workshop:Brinkman/Machine shop workshop:
Jan Maneti spoke Half million dollars of new equipment Low volume CNC equipment, run manually or CNC capabilities TIG/MIG welding, workshop will be provided by Kay… There is a nice wood shop with panel saws and wood processing equipment, not available to students,
but they will do the work for us. Paint booth availability if needed for spray painting 8am-9pm shop is staffed (by the end of the month may get extended to 12am.) No weekend machine work. MSD Project advising, it is good to get project reviewed before manufacturing to get any feedback. BE
PROACTIVE and check in with the machine shop specialists to prevent drastic changes in design. If you use the shop use the log in to the computer with your group (not all members necessary.) There is a sign out of a computer for material that needs to be taken out, MUST be Returned. Very important to have a complete work tracking sheet, pick up and drop off from the centralized location.
Must provide contact numbers. The form is also on mycourses. There is very small amount of leftover scrap material that is available for us to use. There is a tool crib in the basement that we can look through Some fasteners are in the basement Looking for the appropriate material: depends on the size, Rochester Steel Surplus ( Kline?) discounted
rates because this is leftover scrap. Find the certain material that you actually need, think about the time it will take to machine. Sometimes you are better off paying a little extra to get closer to what you need.
Brinkman: more advanced CNC equipment (John Bonzo) has his own forms for processing there. Water jet is not precision or square. If you need to install bearings or bushings, you cannot expect that the
holes will be accurate enough. Try to design your project around standard stock sizes Engineers black book is a very good resource. The machine shop really does have lots of vendors and resources, with connections to Sales Engineers
who are specialists in knowing materials that we could need. Sometimes they will donate, and many times there are discounts.
Fan Ideas:
Hand crank to start up air flow for fan at the end of chimney Fan above top of chimney or to the side that would spin fan in the end of the chimney Fan in the end of chimney only moved from heated air leaving chimney
11
Week 9:Tuesday 10-18:
Questions for Dr. Stevens:
1. CustomerQ: Is it ok, if our final system looks a lot like yours, only varying dimensions and materials?2. SME: is it reasonable believe there are better dryer chamber configurations to improve the flow and
drying?3. SME: Why was the dryer chamber designed as it is?4. SME: Do you think we need some sort of assistive device to move air through the system?
a. Or do we develop a way to make the passive system (more) effective
Outcome of this meeting:1. Continue with reworking current design2. Approving one of new proposed designs (probably with modifications/suggestions)3. Doesn’t approve proposed designs, but gives his blessing for new design. In this case, we’ll set up a
secondary meeting to propose more designs for approval prior to PDDR.
Advice from John: Walk out of the meeting with either the answer, or confidence that we know how to get the answer fairly
easily Rank the ideas on a scale of 1-10 of enthusiasm versus don’t go down that road.
For Thursday:
Advice from John: The next meeting is to be incremental, the focus should be on sketches and drawings. Do not recap things that we have already talked about. Formulas and airflow concepts to get verified/approved. When we did the systems design review we were here, since then here is what we have accomplished
12345, and then review what our upcoming plans are to do with the design that we have at the point. The last review at the end of the semester should be comprehensive of the semester. It’s okay to come in with “papers on the table”.
Action Items: Put in an executive summary for the cover page of edge Planning and execution page
_____________________________________________________________________________
Thursday 10-20:
Results of meeting with Dr. Stevens: Move forward with stacked tray design. Focus on scaling up stacked drying chamber
12
Week 10:Advice from John:
Is there data available of the amount of humidity in the chamber as moisture gets added in the format of added fruit?
Notes: The Matlab file has some error that is preventing showing the data from 3 trays. http://www.haiti.climatemps.com/sunlight.php Haiti day length: 8.5 hours
Meeting Outline:Timeline to PDDR
1. Dryer dimension configuration will come from:a. DOE matlab modelsb. Output analysis
2. CAD Model3. Matlab chimney models4. Materials
b. Cost analysis c. Model refinement
Action Items: Everyone: Type up 3 week Plans Kaleigh: Presentation Preparation, Organize all Weeks Notes for Edge Slide Templates: Subsystem reviews Sketches/CAD Models Caly: Matlab, try to run the trials, or at least be prepared Matt: CAD Model, start the fluids analysis Kelsey: DOE Analysis preparation. (Assumption verification. Louis: Upload images, screenshots to edge
13
Week 11October 30, 2016
Notes: Caly did review of her Matlab meeting with Dr. Steven’s
Dr. Steven’s agrees that there are issues with the current model Developed some work arounds in the imperfect model Developed some crude calculations that would suffice with Dr. Steven’s Dr. Steven’s will provide us with some efficiencies which are necessary to do the calculations. Dr. Steven’s will be sending environmental data in place of the Rochester Data that we would
typically use. We could probably play around with the angle of the collector, and change the amount of
radiation that would be absorbed. We could get varied data, depending on what orientation we choose to put the collector in . Caly suggests that we keep the dryer and the collector the same heights that Stevens is using
now. Talked about the Tray concept
Alternating, stacked mesh trays 24x48inch wide trays, according to the model this would be a 50 inch collector.
Talked about how big the collector should be. Meeting
Questions for presentation: Chimney design discussions? Don’t want to make roof taper too quick.
_____________________________________________________________________
For Tuesday: Matt: CAD model generation, Actions:
Caly: get together Matlab information for presentation and Edge Collector justification calculations Tray drawings for presentation
Kaleigh summarize the PRP… Cut out all the crap from the PRP, go through old groups to see what they need for the project summaries.
Kaleigh and Kelsey Gantt Chart (tuesday morning 8 am.)
Louie: drying chamber drawing with dimensions How to hold it up.
November 1, 2016:
14
The first plot shows the first day drying predictions for the proposed dryer design. The simulation of the second day was run using the moisture content of each tray (at the final day time step) as the starting moisture content for the second day.
P17483, Day 1 Day 2
Temperature increase [C] 27.6 25.7
Air flow average [kg/s] 0.03 0.032
Moisture removed [kg] 6.85 5.90
Moisture removed over 2 days: ~ 12.75 kg
Approximate goal for 10% moisture content:~ 13.5 kg
Presentation Preparation, Edge Updates for PDDR page, CAD model development, drawings of subsystems.
Action Items: Email Slides to Presentation Group
15
Week 12 Tuesday November 8
Meeting Notes: Took a trip to the machine shop to talk with Rob about using some scrap wood for our testing trays.
Dr. Debartolo Announcements: Read announcements in email, and check whiteboard Final Exam Week: 1 hour gate review, are you ready to enter the build and test phases of MSD 2, close
out any issues from PDDR, MSD 1 reflection, Decide on Gate Review Time and Day (MTW), need to give the guide time to go through the edge, written exams take precedence over date and time selection.
Need to hit all the key elements of things you need to address. Found on MSD 1 Gate review bulleted list. Also complete the self-critique.
Use the PICS system if you are ordering something online. Check surplus first Have all information in place, so that an entirely new team could pick up where we left off in the spring
semester All teams will need to do a progress update on what we have done for detailed design review, and
what we had planned. By the end of the Tuesday class before Thanksgiving. Summarize project to date, notify guide and customer.
All groups are encouraged to submit papers for their projects, as we are required to write a paper anyways.
Advice from John: Our Progress Report will be on Tuesday during class in a conversational format.
Progress Report:
Gate Review Scheduling: Bring a 1-2 page word document with bullets that answer the questions in the word document written by Mark Smith. Summarize where you think we are at the end of the first semester. Improvements, Opportunities, John’s performance as a guide. Here is where we are, here is the answers to the questions in bullets.
Action Items: Kelsey: send an email to Sarah about corrugated metal requirements, and prices of wood in Haiti We need to look into mesh alternatives Thinking of Wall alternatives Louis will make drawings to submit to machine shop on Wednesday to have a pack of trays ready by
Tuesday. Caly emailed Dr. Steven’s to learn more testing plans and model updates
To Accomplish this Week: Tuesday (11-8)/Thursday (11-10):
Develop list of mesh alternatives. Potentially order material for testing. (Done) Matlab simulations from the weekend (Caly) (Done) Wall alternatives for drying chamber Contact Sarah to find out about corrugated metal sheets. (Email sent) Collector calculations from Stevens’ data Drying chamber base?
Machine Shop Job for Wood Trays
16
For Thursday: Tray drawings Kelsey research banana slicers Homemade banana slicer (later on)
17
Week 13:Tuesday:Pacon Foam Board, 22” X 28”, White (5557), Set of 5 - $11.99 on AmazonOptimus H-1322 Portable 2-Speed Fan Heater with Thermostat - $15.67 on Amazon
Meeting Notes: Caly would like Matt or Louie to learn the Matlab Kelsey would like us to review our process report for our Tuesday meeting with John Dr. Steven’s and Deep found a mistake in the model, Caly is looking into it. Matt and Louie went to machine shop to track down the materials that should be ready today Kaleigh is going through the edge Realization from the machine shop that it is too difficult to machine. If would be likely too difficult to
manufacture in Haiti. We need to go through and redesign the Talked about people’s opinions of the door, continuing with the wood frame,
Action Items: Locate cardboard
o 5 - 26” x 24” sheetso 5 - 24” x 24”o 1 - 24” x 12” or 18”
_________________________________________________________________
Thursday November 17, 2016:
Meeting Notes: Caly explained Dr. Steven’s mistake in the model. The law of diminishing returns is present because as the collector size increases it doesn’t necessarily increase the amount of water moisture removed. The average solar flux: working off the weather data is about 800 Watts/m^2. Our collector does not scale linearly with the model that Dr. Steven’s currently uses.
Discussion over dropping the kilograms of bananas to 7 grams (30% reduction) so that air flow will be better through the dryer chamber. Then the collector could be proportionally set to work with the same size dryer. Also, the group is still leaning towards 2 day drying.
Advice from John:We should find the optimal density of fruit in the chamber that maximizes production quantity and ability to dry.Talk with Rachel about designing a DOE integrated from a simulation.
Action Items: Caly and Matt are to meet with Dr. Steven’s to discuss environmental data.
18
Week 14:Tuesday November 29, 2016
Meeting Notes: Caly did a calculation that shows we should only need about 44 sq. feet of collector space to dry the
bananas to our customer requirement. However, we have designed to about 64 sq. feet which should provide more than enough heat through the chamber.
Need to get together a list of everything that needs to be done. Kaleigh will go back through and fix the dimension sizes on the AutoCad drawings. Decided that it we need get the test plan together and potentially set up the upcoming test plans. Matt proposed to buy a Wegmans gift card. “Banana bucks” Kelsey and Kaleigh worked on assembling the testing trays
Action Items: Matt is to finish the drawing in Autocad and upload a PDF to the Google Drive Folder Kaleigh will put the most up-to-date risks on the Edge Page along with any remaining drawings Kelsey and Louie will work together to get an updated and official BOM table.
19
Week 15:Meeting Notes:
We want to order remaining tray materials after the DDR review of Week 15. The plan is to have the trays built prior to returning in January. Can we order materials over break? How much notice should we give the machine shop? Our assembly will most likely be done in one shot because it will be difficult to get any test results of
individual subsystems separately
Action Items: Gate review document Team self-critique Edge Completion Ask John about what the deliverables checklist, Ask John about the critiques and the gate review
document Divide up slides (in progress) DDR summary paragraph for home page
20
MSD 2
Week 1Week 1: 1/23/17
Tuesday:
Meeting Notes: Listened to the presentation from Hanzlik about MSD 1 Post Mortem and Expectations for MSD
2 Talked to Chris Fisher about getting cubicle space because this will not fit on the workbench
that she suggested Locate some straw, talk to FMS
Notes from John: We need to figure out what we want to be able to present at the Week 5 demo. For weekly check-ins: What did your plan or action items say you should have had done in the
past week, what did you get done, what are your next steps to get done for the upcoming week. On Thursdays he will not come looking for us. Watch the movie Lion.
To-DoFind out how much tarp Dr. Stevens has left and verify that we can use it. Dr. Steven’s Schedule - (Caly emailed Stevens)We need a project plan for week 2, or action list Week 5 shared vision
Need to do for tray testing: Build actual cardboard chambers Buy bananas Prepare bananas Properties of space heater Figure out how we are going to collect data.
____________________________________________________________________________
21
Thursday
Follow-up from Tuesday We’re going to meet with Stevens at the end of class Thursday to look at testing space in his
lab. We can use all the tarp Get a list of testing equipment
o Flow metero Thermocouples + measurement device
Bill of Materials updateo Color-coding (or something else?)
Phase 1 Deliverables to get together: Review MSD 1 post mortem BOM update MSD 2 expanded plan Team shared vision for
o Final customer reviewo Imagineo Week 5 review
3 week plans (for weeks 3-5) Expanded test plans
Meeting Notes
The only thing we could actually test separately would be the collector because we could rig it up to Dr. Steven’s setup. Though it wouldn’t be totally representative because of the differences in chimney. It would be closer than nothing. We would be able to input the same conditions into that Matlab model Dr. Steven’s thinks there is more than enough space in his lab for us to do tray pack testing.Interested to see what our solution will be for measuring the mass of the bananas on flexible trays instead of windows
Kaleigh’s Response to Caly’s Email Your vision of what you think we can realistically accomplish before the W5 review.
o I think realistically we can have all of the tray packs assembled, the frame tor the chamber built, and the collector frame built. Additionally, we probably can even poke the holes in the tarp.
o Completion of a chamber simulation using cardboard boxes What part of the W5 vision you can do/help with.
o Tray assemblyo Hole pokingo Attending and monitoring the simulation of the chambero Peeling bananaso Keeping everything up-to-date on edge
Small/last minute items to add to the BOMo Straw
Test plan elaboration and how each engineering requirements matches up. We've already (kinda) done this.
22
Meeting 1/27 at 1PM to assemble tray testing cardboard housing. During this time, work on: Task lists for each person What we want done for W5 review
23
Week 2Week 2: 1/31/17
Tuesday:
Notes from John: Write up test plans in excel document found on MyCourses We have to do 2 peer reviews. We can do weeks 2 and 8 or weeks 5 and 8. Don’t do numbers,
focus on the pluses and deltas Figure out optimal tray density (test this during our cardboard tray testing?) Can we test tray density only using airflow? Maybe we don’t have to run a full test. (Louie says it
has more to do with moisture content of air than it does airflow) Put schedule on edge or email to John Think about how we want to present to Dr. Stevens during week 5. (Where, what, how?) Put the 4 things we want to show in week 5 in an email and send to Stevens to see if that is
what he was expecting Do we have any specs on the durability of the landscape fabric Should we test the durability of the fabric somehow? Paragraph summary - why we’re doing the cardboard thing, where we are on test plans, the
need to nail down the return on investment, firmed up demo plans for week 5.
To-Do Fix netting on 2C and 2D Talk to John about calculating ROI
____________________________________________________________________________
Thursday
Follow-up from Tuesday
Things to do in class Thursday: Get together info for Edge Cut tarps and start poking holes Plan for next test on Monday/Tuesday or Tuesday/Wednesday
o Additional materials we missed last time (bags, cutting surfaces, etc)o Reevaluate testing setup, mostly the bottom part.
Cut collector wood
Meeting Notes Talked to Stevens, he’s good to meet anytime after 2 on Monday to talk about collector testing.
Also gave him the bananas from the first test Meeting tomorrow at 11 to make a new testing base, maybe mark/poke holes in second
collector tarp. 2 day test next week, Tuesday-Wednesday.
o Need garbage bags for individual trays Tuesday nighto Planned for 28lbs of bananas, should give us just under 15lbs for drying.
Collector wood is all cut.
24
25