wda poster_150724(2)

1
Figure 2: Horse owners’ a,tudes towards flying foxes and their management in regards to HeV. Each bar represents the propor>on (%) of the 577 respondents for each response “As long as we’ve had bats, we’ve had Hendra” – Horse owners’ knowledge and risk perception of <lying foxes in regards to Hendra virus Eliza McDonald 1 , Anke Wiethoelter 1,2 , Melanie Taylor 2 , Nicole Schembri 2 , Navneet Dhand 1 , Nina Kung 3 , Barbara Moloney 4 , Therese Wright 4 , Hume Field 3,5 and JennyAnn Toribio 1 1 Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 2 Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, 3 Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 4 New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 5 EcoHealth Alliance Hendra virus (HeV) – zoonosis of public health concern in Australia Spills over from flying foxes (Pteropus spp.) to horses and from horses to humans High fatality rate – 75% in horses and 57% in humans (Kung et al. 2013) 53 spillover events since iden>fica>on in Hendra, Queensland in 1994 – all spillover loca>ons overlap with distribu>on of flying fox species (see Figure 1) HENDRA VIRUS BACKGROUND This study is part of the Horse owners and Hendra virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk (HHALTER) project and focuses on the knowledge, risk percep>on and a,tudes of horse owners towards flying foxes as the reservoir hosts of HeV. Data presented here are based on responses of the 577 par>cipa>ng horse owners in a selfadministered online survey in December 2014. Ordinal logis>c regression was conducted to evaluate the influence of various factors on horse owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their proper>es, categorised as ‘yes’, ‘unsure’ and ‘no’. METHODS ATTITUDES & RISK PERCEPTION TOWARDS FLYING FOXES Hall, L.S and Richards, G 2000, ‘Flying foxes: fruit and blossom bats of Australia.’ (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney); Kung, N, McLaughlin, A, Taylor, M, Moloney, B, Wright, T & Field, H 2013, 'Hendra virus and horse owners risk percep>on and management', PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 18.; Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (2014). "Hendra Virus.” Retrieved 9 March 2015, from hkps://www.daff.qld.gov.au/animalindustries/animalhealthanddiseases/azlist/ ; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (2015). “Hendra virus case confirmed on NSW north coast.” Retrieved 18 July 2015, from hkp://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/news/all/2015/hendravirusconfirmedonnswnorthcoast REFERENCES CONCLUSIONS STUDY OBJECTIVES 1. Iden>fy horse owners’ a,tudes towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and their management 2. Evaluate factors influencing horse owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes and how these may impact subsequent uptake of risk mi>ga>on strategies Flying foxes were perceived as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their property by 18% of horse owners and not viewed as a threat by 71%, with the remainder of horse owners ‘unsure’. Out of the 104 respondents who did perceive flying foxes as a threat: 84% had vaccinated either all or some of their horses 96% lived in Queensland or New South Wales 52% lived less than 50km from the nearest HeV case in a horse Furthermore, horse owners who saw flying foxes either nearby or on their horse property were 11 >mes more likely to perceive them as a threat compared to those who did not see them (P < 0.001). Addi>onally, those who believed a HeV case was very likely to occur in their area were 28 >mes more likely to perceive them as a threat compared to those who believed it was not at all likely to occur (P < 0.001) (see Figure 3). Most horse owners did not perceive flying foxes as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their proper>es However, the majority of those who did perceive flying foxes as a threat kept horses in or close to HeV affected regions and had implemented risk mi>ga>on measures by vaccina>ng some or all of their horse(s) Sigh>ngs of flying foxes and a belief that a HeV case is likely to occur in their area are among the most influen>al factors on owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes The majority of horse owners recognised the need for flying foxes, par>cularly in respect to the important role they play in the environment These findings will inform government agencies and the equine industry on a,tudes of horse owners towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and could be used to enhance communica>on around risk mi>ga>on strategies Such factors included: 1. Demographics 2. HeV risk awareness and risk mi>ga>on strategies, including vaccina>on and property management 3. A,tudes and percep>on towards flying foxes and camp management Figure 3: Influence of sigh>ngs of flying foxes nearby or on horse proper>es reported by horse owners and the likelihood of a HeV case in area perceived by horse owners on their risk percep>on of flying foxes 0% 50% 100% We don't need them They should not be protected They should not be culled/shot They pose a significant health threat to people They play an important role in the environment Propor>on (%) of horse owners Agree Neutral Disagree Figure 1: Loca>ons of HeV cases overlapping with the distribu>on of flying fox popula>ons Credit: Silvia 2014 Credit: Niland 2012 Horse owners displayed various a,tudes towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and their management (see Figure 2): Factors Influencing Horse Owners’ Risk PercepGon of Flying Foxes to Horse Health AJtudes Towards Flying Foxes Spectacled flying fox (P. conspicillatus) Black flying fox (P. alecto) Greyheaded flying fox (P. poliocephalus) Southern inland limit of likle red flying fox (P. scapulatus) HeV spillover event loca>ons Adapted from Hall & Richards (2000) The University of Western Sydney was contracted by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corpora>on to undertake this research project. This research was funded by the Commonwealth of Australia, the State of New South Wales and the State of Queensland under the Na>onal Hendra Virus Research Program. (DAFF 2014; NSW DPI 2015) Owners’ Percep>on of Flying Foxes as a Threat 0% 50% 100% Yes Unsure No Propor>on Sigh>ngs of Flying Foxes Very likely Moderately likely Not at all likely Likelihood of HeV in Area Yes Unsure No

Upload: eliza-mcdonald

Post on 21-Jan-2017

84 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: WDA POSTER_150724(2)

Figure  2:  Horse  owners’  a,tudes  towards  flying  foxes  and  their  management  in  regards  to  HeV.  Each  bar  represents  the  propor>on  (%)  of  the  577  respondents  for  each  response    

“As  long  as  we’ve  had  bats,  we’ve  had  Hendra”  –  Horse  owners’  knowledge  and  risk  perception  of  <lying  foxes  in  regards  to  Hendra  virus  

Eliza  McDonald1,  Anke  Wiethoelter1,2,  Melanie  Taylor2,  Nicole  Schembri2,  Navneet  Dhand1,  Nina  Kung3,  Barbara  Moloney4,  Therese  Wright4,  Hume  Field3,5  and  Jenny-­‐Ann  Toribio1    

 

1Faculty  of  Veterinary  Science,  The  University  of  Sydney,  2Centre  for  Health  Research,  University  of  Western  Sydney,  3Queensland  Department  of  Agriculture  and  Fisheries,  4New  South  Wales  Department  of  Primary  Industries,  5EcoHealth  Alliance  

•  Hendra  virus  (HeV)  –  zoonosis  of  public  health  concern  in  Australia  •  Spills  over  from  flying  foxes  (Pteropus  spp.)  to  horses  and  from  horses  to  

humans  •  High  fatality  rate  –  75%  in  horses  and  57%  in  humans  (Kung  et  al.  2013)  •  53  spillover  events  since  iden>fica>on  in  Hendra,  Queensland  in  1994  –  all  

spillover  loca>ons  overlap  with  distribu>on  of  flying  fox  species  (see  Figure  1)  

HENDRA  VIRUS  BACKGROUND  

This  study  is  part  of  the  Horse  owners  and  Hendra  virus:  A  Longitudinal  cohort  study  To  Evaluate  Risk  (HHALTER)  project  and  focuses  on  the  knowledge,  risk  percep>on  and  a,tudes  of  horse  owners  towards  flying  foxes  as  the  reservoir  hosts  of  HeV.  Data  presented  here  are  based  on  responses  of  the  577  par>cipa>ng  horse  owners  in  a  self-­‐administered  online  survey  in  December  2014.  Ordinal  logis>c  regression  was  conducted  to  evaluate  the  influence  of  various  factors  on  horse  owners’  risk  percep>on  of  flying  foxes  as  a  current  threat  to  the  health  of  horse(s)  on  their  proper>es,  categorised  as  ‘yes’,  ‘unsure’  and  ‘no’.        

 

METHODS  

ATTITUDES  &  RISK  PERCEPTION  TOWARDS  FLYING  FOXES  

Hall,  L.S  and  Richards,  G  2000,  ‘Flying  foxes:  fruit  and  blossom  bats  of  Australia.’  (University  of  New  South  Wales  Press:  Sydney);    Kung,  N,  McLaughlin,  A,  Taylor,  M,  Moloney,  B,  Wright,  T  &  Field,  H  2013,  'Hendra  virus  and  horse  owners  -­‐  risk  percep>on  and  management',  PLOS  One,    vol.  8,    no.  11,  pp.  1-­‐8.;    Queensland  Department  of  Agriculture  and  Fisheries  (2014).  "Hendra  Virus.”  Retrieved  9  March  2015,  from  hkps://www.daff.qld.gov.au/animal-­‐industries/animal-­‐health-­‐and-­‐diseases/a-­‐z-­‐list/;  New  South  Wales  Department  of  Primary  Industries  (2015).  “Hendra  virus  case  confirmed  on  NSW  north  coast.”  Retrieved  18  July  2015,  from  hkp://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/news/all/2015/hendra-­‐virus-­‐confirmed-­‐on-­‐nsw-­‐north-­‐coast            

REFERENCES  

CONCLUSIONS  

STUDY  OBJECTIVES  1.  Iden>fy  horse  owners’  a,tudes  towards  flying  foxes  in  regards  to  HeV  and  

their  management  2.  Evaluate  factors  influencing  horse  owners’  risk  percep>on  of  flying  foxes  

and  how  these  may  impact  subsequent  uptake  of  risk  mi>ga>on  strategies  

Flying  foxes  were  perceived  as  a  current  threat  to  the  health  of  horse(s)  on  their  property  by  18%  of  horse  owners  and  not  viewed  as  a  threat  by  71%,  with  the  remainder  of  horse  owners  ‘unsure’.  

Out  of  the  104  respondents  who  did  perceive  flying  foxes  as  a  threat:  •  84%  had  vaccinated  either  all  or  some  of  their  horses  •  96%  lived  in  Queensland  or  New  South  Wales  •  52%  lived  less  than  50km  from  the  nearest  HeV  case  in  a  horse  

Furthermore,  horse  owners  who  saw  flying  foxes  either  nearby  or  on  their  horse  property  were  11  >mes  more  likely  to  perceive  them  as  a  threat  compared  to  those  who  did  not  see  them  (P  <  0.001).  Addi>onally,  those  who  believed  a  HeV  case  was  very  likely  to  occur  in  their  area  were  28  >mes  more  likely  to  perceive  them  as  a  threat  compared  to  those  who  believed  it  was  not  at  all  likely  to  occur  (P  <  0.001)  (see  Figure  3).  

•  Most  horse  owners  did  not  perceive  flying  foxes  as  a  current  threat  to  the  health  of  horse(s)  on  their  proper>es  •  However,  the  majority  of  those  who  did  perceive  flying  foxes  as  a  threat  kept  horses  in  or  close  to  HeV  affected  regions  and  had  implemented  risk  mi>ga>on  

measures  by  vaccina>ng  some  or  all  of  their  horse(s)  •  Sigh>ngs  of  flying  foxes  and  a  belief  that  a  HeV  case  is  likely  to  occur  in  their  area  are  among  the  most  influen>al  factors  on  owners’  risk  percep>on  of  flying  foxes  •  The  majority  of  horse  owners  recognised  the  need  for  flying  foxes,  par>cularly  in  respect  to  the  important  role  they  play  in  the  environment  •  These  findings  will  inform  government  agencies  and  the  equine  industry  on  a,tudes  of  horse  owners  towards  flying  foxes  in  regards  to  HeV  and  could  be  used  to  

enhance  communica>on  around  risk  mi>ga>on  strategies  

Such  factors  included:  1.  Demographics  2.  HeV  risk  awareness  and  risk  mi>ga>on  

strategies,  including  vaccina>on  and  property  management  

3.  A,tudes  and  percep>on  towards  flying  foxes  and  camp  management  

Figure  3:  Influence  of  sigh>ngs  of  flying  foxes  nearby  or  on  horse  proper>es  reported  by  horse  owners  and  the  likelihood  of  a  HeV  case  in  area  perceived  by  horse  owners  on  their  risk  percep>on  of  flying  foxes  

0%   50%   100%  

We  don't  need  them  

They  should  not  be  protected  

They  should  not  be  culled/shot  

They  pose  a  significant  health  threat  to  people  

They  play  an  important  role  in  the  environment  

Propor>on  (%)  of  horse  owners  

Agree   Neutral   Disagree  

Figure  1:  Loca>ons  of  HeV  cases  overlapping  with  the  distribu>on  of  flying  fox  popula>ons  

Credit:  Silvia  2014  

Credit:  Niland  2012  

Horse  owners  displayed  various  a,tudes  towards  flying  foxes  in  regards  to  HeV  and  their  management  (see  Figure  2):  

Factors  Influencing  Horse  Owners’  Risk  PercepGon  of  Flying  Foxes  to  Horse  Health  

AJtudes  Towards  Flying  Foxes  

Spectacled  flying  fox  (P.    conspicillatus)  Black  flying  fox  (P.  alecto)  Grey-­‐headed  flying  fox  (P.  poliocephalus)  Southern  inland  limit  of  likle  red  flying  fox  (P.  scapulatus)  HeV  spillover  event  loca>ons  

Adapted  from  Hall  &  Richards  (2000)  

The  University  of  Western  Sydney  was  contracted  by  the  Rural  Industries  Research  and  Development  Corpora>on  to  undertake  this  research  project.  This  research  was  funded  by  the  Commonwealth  of  Australia,  the  State  of  New  South  Wales  and  the  State  of  Queensland  under  the  Na>onal  Hendra  Virus  Research  Program.    

(DAFF  2014;  NSW  DPI  2015)  

Owners’  Percep>on  of  Flying  Foxes  as  a  Threat    

0%  

50%  

100%  

Yes   Unsure   No  

Prop

or>o

n  

Sigh>ngs  of  Flying  Foxes  

Very  likely   Moderately  likely  

Not  at  all  likely  

Likelihood  of  HeV  in  Area  

Yes   Unsure   No