wda poster_150724(2)
TRANSCRIPT
Figure 2: Horse owners’ a,tudes towards flying foxes and their management in regards to HeV. Each bar represents the propor>on (%) of the 577 respondents for each response
“As long as we’ve had bats, we’ve had Hendra” – Horse owners’ knowledge and risk perception of <lying foxes in regards to Hendra virus
Eliza McDonald1, Anke Wiethoelter1,2, Melanie Taylor2, Nicole Schembri2, Navneet Dhand1, Nina Kung3, Barbara Moloney4, Therese Wright4, Hume Field3,5 and Jenny-‐Ann Toribio1
1Faculty of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, 2Centre for Health Research, University of Western Sydney, 3Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, 4New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, 5EcoHealth Alliance
• Hendra virus (HeV) – zoonosis of public health concern in Australia • Spills over from flying foxes (Pteropus spp.) to horses and from horses to
humans • High fatality rate – 75% in horses and 57% in humans (Kung et al. 2013) • 53 spillover events since iden>fica>on in Hendra, Queensland in 1994 – all
spillover loca>ons overlap with distribu>on of flying fox species (see Figure 1)
HENDRA VIRUS BACKGROUND
This study is part of the Horse owners and Hendra virus: A Longitudinal cohort study To Evaluate Risk (HHALTER) project and focuses on the knowledge, risk percep>on and a,tudes of horse owners towards flying foxes as the reservoir hosts of HeV. Data presented here are based on responses of the 577 par>cipa>ng horse owners in a self-‐administered online survey in December 2014. Ordinal logis>c regression was conducted to evaluate the influence of various factors on horse owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their proper>es, categorised as ‘yes’, ‘unsure’ and ‘no’.
METHODS
ATTITUDES & RISK PERCEPTION TOWARDS FLYING FOXES
Hall, L.S and Richards, G 2000, ‘Flying foxes: fruit and blossom bats of Australia.’ (University of New South Wales Press: Sydney); Kung, N, McLaughlin, A, Taylor, M, Moloney, B, Wright, T & Field, H 2013, 'Hendra virus and horse owners -‐ risk percep>on and management', PLOS One, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1-‐8.; Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries (2014). "Hendra Virus.” Retrieved 9 March 2015, from hkps://www.daff.qld.gov.au/animal-‐industries/animal-‐health-‐and-‐diseases/a-‐z-‐list/; New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (2015). “Hendra virus case confirmed on NSW north coast.” Retrieved 18 July 2015, from hkp://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/aboutus/news/all/2015/hendra-‐virus-‐confirmed-‐on-‐nsw-‐north-‐coast
REFERENCES
CONCLUSIONS
STUDY OBJECTIVES 1. Iden>fy horse owners’ a,tudes towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and
their management 2. Evaluate factors influencing horse owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes
and how these may impact subsequent uptake of risk mi>ga>on strategies
Flying foxes were perceived as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their property by 18% of horse owners and not viewed as a threat by 71%, with the remainder of horse owners ‘unsure’.
Out of the 104 respondents who did perceive flying foxes as a threat: • 84% had vaccinated either all or some of their horses • 96% lived in Queensland or New South Wales • 52% lived less than 50km from the nearest HeV case in a horse
Furthermore, horse owners who saw flying foxes either nearby or on their horse property were 11 >mes more likely to perceive them as a threat compared to those who did not see them (P < 0.001). Addi>onally, those who believed a HeV case was very likely to occur in their area were 28 >mes more likely to perceive them as a threat compared to those who believed it was not at all likely to occur (P < 0.001) (see Figure 3).
• Most horse owners did not perceive flying foxes as a current threat to the health of horse(s) on their proper>es • However, the majority of those who did perceive flying foxes as a threat kept horses in or close to HeV affected regions and had implemented risk mi>ga>on
measures by vaccina>ng some or all of their horse(s) • Sigh>ngs of flying foxes and a belief that a HeV case is likely to occur in their area are among the most influen>al factors on owners’ risk percep>on of flying foxes • The majority of horse owners recognised the need for flying foxes, par>cularly in respect to the important role they play in the environment • These findings will inform government agencies and the equine industry on a,tudes of horse owners towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and could be used to
enhance communica>on around risk mi>ga>on strategies
Such factors included: 1. Demographics 2. HeV risk awareness and risk mi>ga>on
strategies, including vaccina>on and property management
3. A,tudes and percep>on towards flying foxes and camp management
Figure 3: Influence of sigh>ngs of flying foxes nearby or on horse proper>es reported by horse owners and the likelihood of a HeV case in area perceived by horse owners on their risk percep>on of flying foxes
0% 50% 100%
We don't need them
They should not be protected
They should not be culled/shot
They pose a significant health threat to people
They play an important role in the environment
Propor>on (%) of horse owners
Agree Neutral Disagree
Figure 1: Loca>ons of HeV cases overlapping with the distribu>on of flying fox popula>ons
Credit: Silvia 2014
Credit: Niland 2012
Horse owners displayed various a,tudes towards flying foxes in regards to HeV and their management (see Figure 2):
Factors Influencing Horse Owners’ Risk PercepGon of Flying Foxes to Horse Health
AJtudes Towards Flying Foxes
Spectacled flying fox (P. conspicillatus) Black flying fox (P. alecto) Grey-‐headed flying fox (P. poliocephalus) Southern inland limit of likle red flying fox (P. scapulatus) HeV spillover event loca>ons
Adapted from Hall & Richards (2000)
The University of Western Sydney was contracted by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corpora>on to undertake this research project. This research was funded by the Commonwealth of Australia, the State of New South Wales and the State of Queensland under the Na>onal Hendra Virus Research Program.
(DAFF 2014; NSW DPI 2015)
Owners’ Percep>on of Flying Foxes as a Threat
0%
50%
100%
Yes Unsure No
Prop
or>o
n
Sigh>ngs of Flying Foxes
Very likely Moderately likely
Not at all likely
Likelihood of HeV in Area
Yes Unsure No