written discourse analysis (wda)

21
Written Discourse Analysis (WDA) Group 2: 1. Ambar Nurul Ansari 2. Dwi Firli Ashari 3. Nurul Noviana 4. Widya Laksmawati 5. Yulia Sari Riyanti

Upload: dwi-firli-ashari

Post on 15-Jul-2015

100 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Group 2:

1. Ambar Nurul Ansari

2. Dwi Firli Ashari

3. Nurul Noviana

4. Widya Laksmawati

5. Yulia Sari Riyanti

Page 2: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Outline Presentation

Example of written discourse and analysis from:

1. Path

2. BBM

3. Facebook

4. WhatsApp (WA)

Page 3: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Path

Page 4: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis

• From the screenshots above, there is different perspective within the quote and the person. The quote includes the Mathematics thing and the person cannot understand even I have explained what it is meant by the quote. It is because the prior knowledge of the person is different with Mathematic thing and also her interests. She is an English teacher from Global Prestasi School and she does not like Mathematics. Therefore, although the quote is quite funny, she still cannot understand what it intends to or refer to.

Page 5: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: BBM

Page 6: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis

• The second one is the conversation on BBM. I posted a private message which was “Bete banget sama anak priuk”. I wish the respond was like asking why or something related with the private message. But then, I got the different respond which was “Walahh.. Piye kbrmu mbar?” It was really far from the respond that I wanted. Maybe, it is because of the different culture. She has not been to Jakarta and of course she does not know Priuk. And the second possibility is she does not know who the person that I mean is. That is why those things happened.

Page 7: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Facebook

Page 8: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis

1. Comment #1 (respondent)

• Gender: female

• Age: is about 22 y.o

• Status: alumnus

• Intension: giving tips based on her experience + giving another news for capacity development

2. Comment #2 (respondent)

• Gender: male

• Age: is about 18-19 y.o

• Status: freshman

• Intension: giving criteria based on his personal opinion toward the question

Page 9: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis

3. Comment #3 (respondent)

• Gender: male

• Age: is about 20 y.o

• Status: third-year college students

• Intension: sarcasm to me (it’s because I am writing my capstone and is about to graduate next year)

Page 10: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Facebook

The GazettE here means a name of Japanese Visual Kei band that most of Indonesian young generations who love Japanese culture familiar with.

(And everybody is STILL waiting for them to come to Indonesia. )

Page 11: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Responses toward status posted

Page 12: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis #1st respond

• Interlocutor: he does not much follow the news about Japanese pop culture

• He believes the information.

• Stereotype of men: straight-forward

Page 13: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis #2nd respond

• Level of shock: overload

Page 14: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis #3rd respond

• Doubt, surprised

Page 15: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis #4th & 5th responds

• Surprised, expecting confirmation

• Interjection: “eh?” Japanese

• Surprised, doubt

• Interjection: “hee?” Japanese

Page 16: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis #6th respond

• Expecting confirmation

• Believes the information

• Request

Page 17: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Facebook

Page 18: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: Analysis

• People who give response on my status stated that they agree with me. I think, maybe all of them have the same feeling which is not stupid though they are slow learner. Some of them even clearly stated that they are not stupid. In my opinion, they have confidence and aware of their own capability. Some of them also put exclamation sign on their respond, and I think it implies that they strongly agree with my status even more than the other.

Page 19: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: BBM Gender: Female and Male Age: 23-24 years old Status: College student Intension: Related to the conversation topic

The conversation is linguistically correct in using punctuation, capitalization, cohesion for each sentences.

In other point of view, this man tends to use exaggerating sentences which is usually used for woman.

Page 20: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

Written discourse: WA Gender: Female and female Age: 21-23 years old Status: College student Intension: Related to the conversation topic

Linguistically analyzed: • She did not use correct

punctuation • Many abbreviations • Slank language • Interjections: ceilaaah, ish,

yowes • Use cohesion

The conversation used

many metaphors to express a feeling or

thought. The metaphors can be ambiguous as positive or negative

meaning.

Page 21: Written Discourse Analysis (WDA)

THANK YOU