w. david helms: assessing u.s. and international experience with health reform and implications for...
DESCRIPTION
Assessing U.S. and International Experience with Health Reform and Implications for the Future by W. David Helms, Ph.D, President and CEO, Academy HealthTRANSCRIPT
Assessing U.S. and International Experience with
Health Reform and Implications for the Future
National Chlamydia Coalition Meeting
W. David HelmsDecember 3, 2009
Presentation Outline
I. Case for Reform: Coverage, Quality and Cost
II. Why U.S. Has Yet to Enact National Health Reform
III. How U.S. Compares Internationally
IV. What Will We Do This Time?
2
Source of Insurance
Employer (55%)
Uninsured(15%)
Military(1%)
Individual(5%)
Medicaid(10%)
Medicare(13%)
Total population
Data: K. Davis, Changing Course: Trends in Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2008, The Commonwealth Fund at Joint Economic Committee hearing, September 10, 2009.
46.3 Million Uninsured, 2008
3
Growth in the Uninsured
Data: K. Davis, Changing Course: Trends in Health Insurance Coverage 2000-2008, The Commonwealth Fund at Joint Economic Committee hearing, September 10, 2009.
38 4042 43 43 45
47 4648 49 50 52 53 55 56
46
6160595857
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Projected estimates
Uninsured Projected to Rise to 61 million by 2020
Millions uninsured
4
Health Insurance Coverageby Poverty Level, 2008
42%
71%
29%
12%29%
18% 10%
83%
20%
92%
7%
45%
4%5%
35%
0%
100%
<100% FPL 100-199%FPL
200-299%FPL
300-399%FPL
400%+ FPL
Employer/Other Private Medicaid/Other Public Uninsured
FPL -- The federal poverty level was $22,025 for a family of four in 2008. Data may not total 100% due to rounding. SOURCE: KCMU/Urban Institute analysis of 2009 ASEC Supplement to the CPS. 5
Average Family Premium as a Percentage of Median Family Income, 1999–2020
11%12%
13%
14%
16%17%
18%18%18% 18%19%19%19%20%20%21%21%
22%22%
23%24%
18%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%19
99
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Source: K. Davis, Why Health Reform Must Counter the Rising Costs of Health Insurance Premiums, The Commonwealth Fund, August 2009.
Projected
6
Who are the Uninsured? Working families—66% of the uninsured are in families with one or more full-time
workers
More than half of uninsured workers are ineligible for their firm’s plan or employed by firms that do not offer health benefits
2/3 have incomes below 200% FPL ($44,100 for a family of 4.) With the average family insurance policy now costing around $12,680, this group cannot afford health insurance without a subsidy.
Another 23% have incomes from 200-400% FPL. This group would require a sliding scale subsidy to make health insurance affordable
Minorities—Almost one-third of Hispanics and Native Americans, and 19.4% of African-Americans lack health insurance
Young adults have the highest uninsured rates; those aged 18-24 and 25-34 have uninsured rates at 28.1 percent and 25.7 percent, respectively.
More than 9 million children are uninsured. When including those with a coverage gap at some point during the year, that number doubles. It is estimated that almost 75% of these children qualify for public insurance coverage.
Source: State of the States, AcademyHealth, 2009
7
Why Health Insurance Matters Uninsured are:
– Less likely to receive medical and dental care and have substantially higher unmet health care needs
– More likely to receive lower quality of care– More likely to be hospitalized for preventable conditions– Have a higher risk of dying in the hospital or shortly after discharge– More likely to go bankrupt because of high medical bills
Per IOM, death rate is 25% higher from being uninsured, cancers are detected later
Reduction in mortality of 10-15% could be expected if uninsured were continuously insured
Nearly 45,000 deaths each year are associated with a lack of health insurance
Source: Alliance for Health Reform. “Health Care Coverage in America: Understanding the Issues and Proposed Solutions,” Updated March 2008.; “Health Insurance and Mortality in US Adults” Wilper et al. Am J Public Health.2009; 99: 2289-2295 8
Quality of U.S. Health Care Early 1980s: RAND assessed clinical
appropriateness for a variety of procedures– One-third of procedures clinically inappropriate
or of uncertain value
RAND reported in 2003 and 2007 that adults and children receive the standard of care about half the time
Care for geriatric conditions is poorer than care for general medical conditions
Source: McGlynn, B. Colorado College Lecture April 7, 2008
9
No One is Immune From Quality Deficits
Source: McGlynn, B. Colorado College Lecture April 7, 2008 (Data Source Asch et al 2006)
10
Money Doesn’t Buy Quality
Source: McGlynn, B. Colorado College Lecture April 7, 2008 (Data Source Asch et al 2006)
11
Total and Per Capita Spending on Health Care, 1965-2005
Source: CBO based on data on spending on health services and supplies, as defined in the national health expenditure accounts, maintained by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Note: Spending amounts are adjusted for inflation using the gross domestic product implicit price deflator from the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
12
Projected Growth in Medicare and
Medicaid as Percent of GDP
Source: Congressional Budget Office, Projected Federal Spending Under One Fiscal Scenario
(Percentage of gross domestic product)
13
II. Why the U.S. Has Yet to Enact Universal Coverage
Difficulty of making major reforms in the American governmental system
Universal coverage requires substantial income redistribution
Powerful interest groups
Dueling ideologies– Fear of too much government control– Competition vs. regulation
14
Health Reform Requires Imposing Limits
Americans have historically resisted prior attempts to impose limits
Coverage costs more given American resistance to setting limits:– Planning and capacity controls– State rate regulation– Managed care plans with restricted access– Comparative effectiveness research?
15
Prior Justifications For Not Enacting Major Coverage Expansion
1. Need to have well-regulated/managed system before introduce new demand
2. Before expanding coverage – especially entitlement to coverage – first must get health costs under control
3. The numbers of uninsured are exaggerated
4. The uninsured don’t work
5. The uninsured get care anyway
16
Prior Justifications…
6. There are no major health consequences from being uninsured
7. Before enacting new national reform, first need to demonstrate the extent problem can be addressed via voluntary approaches
8. Cannot enact major new coverage expansion while facing a significant budget deficit
9. Why dramatically change a system that works for most Americans just to fix the “uninsured problem?”
17
III. How the U.S. Compares Internationally
The comparative data presented in this segment on quality and cost demonstrates that the US could cover all its residents and provide higher quality at a lower cost to government, employers, and individuals
Not necessary to adopt a government run or single payer system like England, Canada, France or Japan
Could achieve better outcomes at lower cost through some combination of employer requirement and individual mandate that offers coverage through competitive private health plans such as is done in Germany, Netherlands or Switzerland
18
7.2 7.0 6.9 6.8 7.0 6.8 6.8
10.311.1
10.2 9.9 9.9 9.610.1
5.3 5.1 5.0 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7
0
4
8
12
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002^ 2003 2004
U.S. average Bottom 10% states Top 10% states
National Average and State Distribution International Comparison, 2004
2.8 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.3
4.4
5.3
6.8
Japan
Iceland
Sweden
Norway
Finland
Denmark
CanadaU.S.
Infant Mortality RateInfant deaths per 1,000 live births
^ Denotes baseline year.Data: National and state—National Vital Statistics System, Linked Birth and Infant Death Data (AHRQ 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007a); international comparison—OECD Health Data 2007, Version 10/2007.
Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008 19
Mortality Amenable to Health Care
7681
88 84 89 8999 97
8897
109 106116 115 113
130 134128
115
65 71 71 74 74 77 80 82 82 84 84 90 93 96 101 103 103 104 110
0
50
100
150 1997/98 2002/03
Deaths per 100,000 population*
Data: E. Nolte and C.M. McKee, "Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating an Earlier Analysis," Health Affairs Jan.-Feb. 2008, 27(1):58-71 analysis of World Health Organization mortality files.Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2008.
* Countries’ age-standardized death rates before age 75, including ischemic heart disease, diabetes, stroke, and bacterial infections.
20
International Health Expenditures Per Capita, 1980-2005
Data: OECD Health Data 2009 (June 2009)
Average spending on health per capita ($US PPP)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004
United States
Canada
France
Germany
Netherlands
United Kingdom
21
Percentage of NHE Spent on Health Administration and Insurance, 2003
*Includes claims administration, underwriting, marketing, profits and other administrative costs. Data: OECD Health Data 2005Source: Commonwealth Fund National Scorecard on U.S. Health System Performance, 2006
Net costs of health administration and health insurance as percent of national health expenditures
1.9 2.1 2.12.6
3.34.0 4.1 4.2
4.8
5.6
7.3
0
2
4
6
8
France
Finla
nd
Japan
Canad
a
Unite
d Kin
gdom
Nether
lands
Austri
a
Austra
lia
Switzer
land
Germ
any
Unite
d Sta
tes
a
a2002 b1999
b
c2001
c *
22
IV. What Will We Do This Time? The cost of doing nothing is staggering Considerable areas of agreement but we could again let our ideological battle prevent
us from enacting needed reforms No pain, no gain. Cannot cover everyone without either raising taxes or making cuts in
existing programs Predict legislation will be signed by the President that will make a meaningful start on
increasing coverage and “bending the cost curve.” Further reforms will be needed in the years ahead to obtain additional quality improvements and cost savings.
23
Cost of Inaction Over the Next Decade (2009-2019)
Number of uninsured Americans will rise to between 57 and 65 million
Number lacking health insurance will grow by 10% in every state
Businesses will see premiums increase from 60-100%
More employers will drop employer-sponsored group insurance
States will be forced to spend much more on Medicaid, Children’s Health Insurance Programs (CHIP), and safety net services
“Under any scenario, the analysis shows a tremendous economic strain on individuals and businesses in all states if reform is not enacted.”
Source: Garrett B et al. “The Cost of Failure to Enact Health Reform: Implications for States.” Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2009.
24
State of Play for Congressional Proposals(As of December 1, 2009)
Net Change in Deficit Over
10 years
Net Change in # Uninsured Over
10 years
Senate Leadership
-$130 billion -31 million
House Leadership
-$109 billion -36 million
Source: Congressional Budget Office
25
Prevention and WellnessProvision Senate Bill House Bill
Preventive services Plans must provide coverage, without cost-sharing for preventive services and immunizations
No cost-sharing for preventive services, as defined by HHS
Prevention and wellness trust
Authorizes up to $12.9 billion from FY 2010-2014 for Prevention and Public Health Fund
Authorizes up to $15.4 billion from FY 2011-2015 for the Prevention and Wellness Trust Fund
Focus on prevention -Creates the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council to establish and implement a national prevention and health promotion strategy
-Invests in programs at the federal, state, and local level to increase access to clinical preventive services
-Creates a national prevention and wellness strategy to improve the nation’s health through evidence-based clinical and community-based prevention
Focus on wellness Creates a 10-state pilot project that tests the impact of providing wellness programs to at-risk communities
Focus on community prevention and wellness services
27
Lessons from Implementing State Health Reform
Reform is an evolutionary process– Massachusetts did not pass comprehensive reform until its third attempt. Incremental
and failed attempts can lay the groundwork for future efforts– New Jersey, Iowa, and Wisconsin are taking a phased approach. Policymakers are
developing multi-year plans, enacting building block reforms, and planning to pass additional reforms in subsequent years
Coverage expansions must be accompanied by value-enhancing strategies that contain costs and improve quality
Reform proposals can succeed or fail in the implementation process – Key stakeholders are needed during implementation to ensure reform is successful– Programs must have simple, understandable rules. – Outreach and education are critical.
Maintaining sufficient and sustainable funding for reform is essential
Need effective evaluation mechanisms to allow policymakers to adapt programs as needed
28
Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy
Health Safety Net Total Volume and Payments Health Safety Net
(HSN) total volume for hospitals and community health centers increased by 2% in the first six months of Health Safety Net fiscal year 2009 (HSN09) compared to the same period in the prior year.
HSN payments for hospitals and community health centers increased by 0.4% in the first six months of HSN09 compared to the same period in the prior year.
588
347 361
195
140 133
PFY07 (Oct - Mar)
HSN08 (Oct - Mar)
HSN09 (Oct - Mar)
Community Health Centers
Hospitals Inpatient andOutpatient
$310
$177 $176
$21
$18 $20
PFY07 (Oct - Mar)
HSN08 (Oct - Mar)
HSN09 (Oct - Mar)
Community Health Centers
Hospitals Inpatient andOutpatient
783 K
486 K494 K
$331 M
$195 M $196 M
-38%
+2%
-41%
+0.4%
Volume Payments
Source: DHCFP, Health Safety Net Data Warehouse as of 4/9/09
Note: The Uncompensated Care Pool fiscal year (PFY) and the Health Safety Net fiscal year (HSN) run from Oct 1 through Sept 30 of the following year.
29
Need to Get Started Now! Unrealistic to make all needed reforms at once
Incremental + Vision = Sequential
Even if sequential:– Need to make commitment now to provide universal
coverage, recognizing may have to be phased in over time
– Need framework so can make progress on:• Payment reforms• System integration, including prevention and wellness • Use of HIT and CER• Increased capacity to provide primary care, medical
home
30