vulnerable children and their right to be heard
DESCRIPTION
Vulnerable children and their right to be heard. Ann- Christin Cederborg Professor and Head of the department: Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm university. Vulnerable children. Children exposed to: Sexual and physical abuse Sex trade (trafficking) Bullying Children seeking asylum - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Vulnerable children and their right to be heard
Ann-Christin Cederborg Professor and Head of the department:
Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm university
Ann-Christin Cederborg 2
Vulnerable children
Children exposed to: Sexual and physical abuse Sex trade (trafficking) Bullying
Children seeking asylum Neglected children Children with psychological problems Children committing serious crimes
Ann-Christin Cederborg 3
Girl’s exposed to sex trade
Serious social problem
Difficulties with prosecution of traffickers One reason victims’ reluctance to cooperate with
authorities
Ann-Christin Cederborg 4
Children exposed to sex trade
Lindholm, J., Cederborg A-C. & Alm, C. (2014). Adolescent Girls Exploited in the Sex Trade: Informativeness and Evasiveness in Investigative Interviews. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal (in press)
Ann-Christin Cederborg 5
Aim
We do not enough about how to interview exploited children:
This study investigates how girls respond to questions about the sex trade with respect to the quality of questions asked
Ann-Christin Cederborg 6
Quality of question types
Open questions:Invitations prompt children to freely recall information. ”Tell me what happened”
Directive questions openly focus on details already mentioned ”When did you leave Sweden”
Ann-Christin Cederborg 7
Question types
Focused questionsLeading questions focus on details or aspects not previously mentioned, asking to affirm, negate or select given options: ”Do you know anyone here in Sweden”
Suggestive questions assume details that have not been disclosed by the child strongly communicating what response is expected: ” What did you tell your parents before you went to
Sweden”
Ann-Christin Cederborg 8
Quality of responses
Disclosures: Request conforming, Agreements, Disagreements,
Extended task related
Non-disclosures: No answer, evasive responses
Ann-Christin Cederborg 9
ResultQuantitative analyses
Disclosures five times more frequent than non-disclosures.
Request-conforming most common
More than 50% of the question asked were not recommended leading and suggestive questions.
Ann-Christin Cederborg 10
Reason
Victims may fear reprisals
Are under the trafficker’s control
Loyalty towards their trafficker
Disloyal with Law Enforcement
Do not believe the trafficker will be prosecuted
Ann-Christin Cederborg 11
Results
Disclosures involved a large number of yes and no responses implying that few details of legal importance were elicited
Ann-Christin Cederborg 12
Victims
Victims exposed to severe abuse or are in the traffickers’ control are the least likely to disclose information
Have feelings of guilt and shame
Fear of reprimands
Feelings of co-responsibility
Ann-Christin Cederborg 13
Evasive responses
The girls avoid disclosing information about crime specific details:
involvement in the sex trade their relations to persons involved in the crime
Ann-Christin Cederborg 14
Case specific details
Not motivated to disclose: Time laps between the period of exploitation and the
conducting of the police interviews
Exposure of high level of violence, abuse and force
Interviews together with the perpetrator
Ann-Christin Cederborg 15
Novel insights
Further the knowledge about each girl’s personal style to disclose information
Police officers can facilitate disclosure by avoiding criticism, confrontations and leading questions. They should also avoid suggestive prompts
Ann-Christin Cederborg 16
Asylum seeking minors in interpreter-mediated interviews
Objectives Explore the extent to which the minors-
informativeness was effected by the quality of the information seeking prompts
Examine how accurately the interpreter managed to transmit substantial information provided by the minors
Ann-Christin Cederborg 17
A quantitative analysis
Of: the translated questions asked by the officials the minors’ responses to them the accuracy with which the minors’ responses were
rendered
Ann-Christin Cederborg 18
Question types
Open questions: Invitations Directive questions
Focused questions: Leading questions Suggestive utterances
Ann-Christin Cederborg 19
Minors’ responses
Disclosure request conforming extended task-related disagreements and agreements
Non-disclosure evasive absence of responses
Ann-Christin Cederborg 20
Translations of the minors’ responses
close approximation of what the child said summary expanded divergent non-rendition silence
Ann-Christin Cederborg 21
Result
Provision of 3 547 responses: 3 285 were disclosures
262 non-disclosures
Ann-Christin Cederborg 22
Result
Type of disclosures varied depending on type of question asked: Open questions (invitations and directives) elicited
higher level of request conforming responses compared to focused questions
Focused questions (leading and suggestive) elicited more of agreements, disagreements and extended responses
Ann-Christin Cederborg 23
Renditions
Accurate renditions 76%
Inaccurate renditions 16%
Non renditions 8%
Ann-Christin Cederborg 24
Minors withhold specific factsEspecially when asked to: reveal information about ID papers location of the smuggler orphanage home parents’ identities and whereabouts time of events that could provide information for
child’s age estimation smugglers’ and helpers’ identity
Ann-Christin Cederborg 25
Active participants
Seldom gave no answers
Elaborated on their answers
Tried to provide alternative accounts when disagreeing with options given
Elaborated on their responses when they agreed with the options provided
Ann-Christin Cederborg 26
Interpreter
All inaccurate renditions were sources of concern:
Each could negatively affect the quality of information provided to the Migration authorities
For example when they improved on or ignored the style and semantic choices made by the minors
Ann-Christin Cederborg 27
Interpreter-mediated asylum hearings in SwedenKeselman, O., Cederborg, A-C., Lamb, M.E., & Dahlström, Ö. (2008). Mediated communication with minors in asylum- seeking hearings. Journal of Refugee Studies. 21,1,103-116. Keselman, O., Cederborg, A-C., Lamb, M.E., & Dahlström, Ö. (2010a). Asylum seeking minors in interpreter-mediated interviews: what do they say and what happens to their responses? Child & Family Social Work. 15, 325-334.Keselman, O., Cederborg, A-C., & Linell, P. (2010b) “That is not necessary for you to know!” Negotiation of participation status of unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting. 12:1, 83-104.Kelselman, O. (2009). Restricting participation. Unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings in Sweden. Dissertation Linköping University
Ann-Christin Cederborg 28
Overall findings
Interpreters can profoundly influence the fact finding aspects of asylum investigations
Migration authorities have to increase their awareness of how the minors’ disclosures can be influenced by the questions asked
Ann-Christin Cederborg 29
Conclusion
Vulnerable children’s right to be heard is obvious but:
Their motivation to report may vary
Irrespectively, the interviews have to be performed in such a way that the minors are given best possible prerequisites to give their perspective.