vision:
DESCRIPTION
vision: To increase Manitoba’s renewable energy use to 50% (from the present 30%) by 2030 without increasing global GHGs. . www.50by30.org. Why 50 by ‘30?. spend more of our money here reduce our greenhouse gases grow our green industries. no single sector can do this alone. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
vision:To increase Manitoba’s renewable energy use to 50% (from the present 30%) by 2030 without increasing global GHGs.
www.50by30.org
no single sectorcan do this alone
• spend more of our money here • reduce our greenhouse gases
• grow our green industries
Why 50 by ‘30?
• spend more of our money here • reduce our greenhouse gases
• grow our green industries
Why 50 by ‘30?
we can lead Canada
How 50 by 30?
Where will we get the money?
WE’RE ALREADY SPENDING THE MONEY• $1b - natural gas• $4b - gasoline & diesel
IN MANITOBA,RENEWABLE ENERGYIS LOCAL ENERGY
electricityelectricheat
industrial
naturalgas
gasoline & diesel
1990 2008
229 PJ270 PJ
To date
fossil fuelsrenewables
energy sources
1990 2008coal
oil
natural gas
hydro
229 PJ270 PJ
To date
windbiomasssolargeothermal
energy sources
To date
energy sources
source: http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/corporate/statistics/neud/dpa/data_e/databases.cfm
To date
energy sources
link:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AgKYB9UmpEe3dFRZMW1WVllBZmJSSTE1LXNHMjR2MXc&single=true&gid=13&output=html
To date
1983
1985
1988
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
0
2,500
5,000
7,500
10,000
Ground-Source Heat Pumps
1990 2008
11.6 MtCO2e
To date
10.6 MtCO2e
MtCO2e: Megatonnes of CO2 equivalent
greenhouse gas emissions
1990 2008
11.6 MtCO2e
If current trends continue
10.6 MtCO2e
MtCO2e: Megatonnes of CO2 equivalent
2030
~13 MtCO2e
greenhouse gas emissions
1990 2008
229 PJ270 PJ
~333 PJ
2030
If current trends continue
energy
~333 PJ
20301990 2008
229 PJ270 PJ
If current trends continue
fossil fuelsrenewables
energy sources
~333 PJ
20301990 2008coal
oil
natural gas
hydro
229 PJ270 PJ
If current trends continue
windbiomasssolargeothermal
energy sources
1990 20302008
229 PJ270 PJ
~333 PJ
coal
oil
natural gas
hydro
If current trends continue
windbiomass
solargeothermal
energy sources
~333 PJ
20301990 2008coal
oil
natural gas
hydro
229 PJ270 PJ
If current trends continue
60% fossil fuels
35% renewables
energy sources
1990 20302008
229 PJ270 PJ
~312 PJ~333 PJ
50% fossil fuels
50% renewables
A Green Plan
energy sources
1990 20302008
229 PJ270 PJ
A Green Plan
50% fossil fuels
50% renewables
~312 PJ
energy sources
1990 20302008
229 PJ270 PJ
coaloil
natural gas
hydro
A Green Plan
windbiomass
solargeothermal
hydro windbiomass
solargeothermal
natural gas refined oil products (gas & diesel)
coal, propane & derivativesenergy sources
~312 PJ
1990 2008
11.6 MtCO2e
If current trends continue
10.6 MtCO2e
MtCO2e: Megatonnes of CO2 equivalent
2030
~13 MtCO2e
greenhouse gas emissions
1990 2008
11.6 MtCO2e
A Green Plan
10.6 MtCO2e
2030
~13 MtCO2e
~ 9 MtCO2e
greenhouse gas emissions
MtCO2e: Megatonnes of CO2 equivalent
A Green Plan
Where will we get the money?
WE’RE ALREADY SPENDING THE MONEY• $1b - natural gas• $4b - gasoline & diesel
IN MANITOBA,RENEWABLE ENERGYIS LOCAL ENERGY
electricityelectricheat
industrial
naturalgas
gasoline & diesel
A Green Plan
So what do we do?examples• Vermont
http://www.vtenergyplan.vermont.gov/
• North Dakotahttp://www.communityservices.nd.gov/energy/empower-north-dakota-commission-information/
• Germanyhttp://www.bmu.de/english/current_press_releases/pm/48295.php
A Green Plan
So what do we do?Every plan has three areas of types of action
1. Reduce demand2. Increase efficiency3. Increase renewables
A Green Plan
So what do we do?Every plan has three areas of areas of focus
a. Heating & Coolingb. Transportationc. Electricity
A Green Plan
So what do we do?Each participant needs a plan
Reducedemand
Increaseefficiency
Increase Renewables
Heating & Cooling
Transportation
Electricity
A Green Plan
So what do we do?Every plan has three elements
Reducedemand
Increaseefficiency
Increase Renewables
Heating & Cooling
Transportation
Electricity
Who/What is 50 by ‘30?• A project of the Manitoba Environmental Industries Association• Directed by a Steering Committee consisting of leaders from:
o MEIAo University of Manitobao GeoXergyo Southern Comfort Mechanicalo Solar Solutionso Golder Associateso DLF Consultingo International Institute for Sustainable Developmento Climate Change Connection o Providence University Collegeo Green Action Centreo Assiniboine Community College
• Members from industry, civic organizations, universities, businesses, and environmental NGOs
Feed-in-tariffs• Payment for renewable energy from third-party
producers (P. Gipe, wind-works.org)AdvantagesPromotes • Rapid development of distributed and renewable energy• Equality of opportunity in remote communities
Disadvantages (?)• Prices paid should be based on cost of
production rather than market rate for electricity.
Achieving provincial renewable energy targets
Existing modelsOntario• Established under the Green Energy and Green
Economy Act in 2009 Germany• Established in 1990• 51% of renewables owned by German citizens
Achieving provincial renewable energy targets
Providence College• Biomass heating system
Willow Ridge • distributed geothermal heating system
Carpathia School• Solar wall
Car-share program
Manitoba examples
2007
Currently we spend about $5.8 Billion per year on
energy
•$3.6B on gasoline & diesel
•$0.8B on natural gas heat
educe fuel consumption from personal transport by at least the amount of increase due to goods transport at CenterPort"