corpus.ulaval.ca viewanalysis of dnajc13 mutations in french-canadian/french cohort of parkinson’s...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Analysis of DNAJC13 mutations in French-Canadian/French cohort of Parkinson’s disease
Jay P. Ross,1,2, Nicolas Dupre,3 Yves Dauvilliers,4, Stephanie Strong,2,5, Amirthagowri Ambalavanan,1,2, Dan Spiegelman,2,5, Alexandre Dionne-Laporte,2,5, Emanuelle Pourcher,3 Melanie Langlois,3 Michel Boivin,6,7, Claire S. Leblond,1,2, Patrick A. Dion,2,5, Guy A. Rouleau,1,2,5, Ziv Gan-Or1,2,5,*.
Author affiliations 1 Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4 Canada2 Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4 Canada 3 Division of Neurology, CHU de Québec, and Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, G1V 0A6 Canada4 Sleep Unit, National Reference Network for Narcolepsy, Department of Neurology Hôpital-Gui-de Chauliac, CHU Montpellier, INSERM U1061, France5 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 0G4 Canada 6 GRIP, École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec city, QC, G1V 0A6 Canada7 Institute of Genetic, Neurobiological and Social Foundations of Child Development, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia s* Corresponding Author:Ziv Gan-OrMontreal Neurological Institute and hospital,The Department of Human Genetics, McGill University1033 Pine Avenue West,Ludmer Pavilion, room 327Montreal, QC, H3A 1A1Tel: +1-514-398-6821Fax: +1-514 398-8248e-mail: [email protected]
Keywords: DNAJC13, Parkinson’s disease, MIPs
Word count: Main text: 1581, Abstract: 150, References: 26; Tables and Figures: 2
Conflict of interests: All authors report no conflict of interests.
Funding Sources: Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research
12123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435
36
2
Abstract
DNAJC13 mutations have been suggested to cause Parkinson’s disease (PD), yet subsequent
studies reported conflicting results on this association. In the current study, we sequenced the
coding region of DNAJC13 in a French-Canadian/French cohort of 528 PD patients and 692
controls. A total of 62 (11.7%) carriers of rare DNAJC13 variants were identified among PD
patients compared to 82 (11.8%) among controls (p=1.0). Two variants that were previously
suggested to be associated with PD, p.R1516H and p.L2170W, were identified with similar
directions of association as previously reported. The p.R1516H was found in 2 (0.4%) patients
vs. 6 (0.9%, non-significant) controls (meta-analysis OR=0.32, 95%CI=0.15-0.68, p=0.0037)
and the p.L2170W variant was found in 9 (1.7%) patients and 5 (0.7%, non-significant) controls
(meta-analysis OR=2.68, 95%CI=1.32-5.42, p=0.007). Our results provide some support for the
possibility that specific DNAJC13 variants may play a minor role in PD susceptibility, although
studies in additional populations are necessary.
34
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
3
Introduction
Recently, DNAJC13 mutations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PD. The DNAJC13
gene is a possible source of risk factor variants as well as rare causal mutations.(Appel-
Cresswell, et al., 2014,Gustavsson, et al., 2015,Vilarino-Guell, et al., 2014) A single variant in
this gene, p.N855S, has been suggested to cause late-onset PD, and has been demonstrated to co-
segregate with PD within five families of Dutch–German–Russian Mennonite origin from
Saskatchewan and British Columbia, Canada, albeit with incomplete penetrance and with
phenocopies.(Vilarino-Guell, et al., 2014) An additional study suggested that other rare
DNAJC13 variants, such as p.R1516H, p.E1740Q, and p.L2170W, may be associated with
increased or decreased risk for developing PD in Caucasian Canadian and Norwegian
populations.(Gustavsson, et al., 2015) However, subsequent studies in large cohorts of Singapore
Chinese and non-Hispanic-Caucasian populations did not identify mutations in DNAJC13
associated with PD.(Foo, et al., 2014,Lorenzo-Betancor, et al., 2015)
While DNAJC13 is a possible candidate gene for PD, the exact nature of the association
remains inconclusive. To further examine the potential role of DNAJC13 mutations in PD, we
sequenced its coding regions in a cohort of French Canadian and French PD patients and
controls.
Methods
Study population
A cohort of unrelated and consecutively recruited 528 PD patients and 692 controls were
included in this study. The cohort was composed of French-Canadian patients and controls from
Quebec, collected at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de (CHU) de Quebec and Montreal
56
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
4
Neurological Institute, Montreal, Canada, and from French patients and controls recruited at
Montpellier, France. Average patient age was 65.7 ± 10.9 years, with 64.2% men. The control
population included two groups, elderly controls (n=105, average age at enrollment of 61.5 ± 7.6
years) and young controls (n=576, average age at enrollment of 34.6 ± 6.4 years, data on age was
not available for 11 controls). There was no significant difference in DNAJC13 variants
frequency between the two groups, therefore we chose to analyze them as a single control
population, with average age of 38.7 ± 11.8 years with 39.6% men. PD was diagnosed by
movement disorder specialists according to the UK Brain Bank Criteria,(Hughes, et al., 1992)
without excluding patients who have relatives with PD. All patients signed informed consent
before entering the study, and the institutional review boards approved the study protocols.
DNA extraction and DNAJC13 Sequencing
DNA was extracted using a standard salting out protocol. The coding sequence of DNAJC13 was
targeted using molecular inversion probes (MIPs), that were designed as described by O’Roak
and colleagues.(O'Roak, et al., 2012) MIPs were selected based on their predicted quality,
coverage and overlap, and Supplementary Table 1 includes the MIPs used to sequence
DNAJC13 in the current study. The library was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500
platform at the McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre. Sequence processing
was done using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA),(Li and Durbin, 2009) the Genome Analysis
Toolkit (GATK v.2.6.4)(McKenna, et al., 2010) and ANNOVAR.(Wang, et al., 2010) Online
prediction and conservation tools (SIFT,(Kumar, et al., 2009) PolyPhen 2(Adzhubei, et al., 2010)
and GERP++(Davydov, et al., 2010)) were used to assess the deleteriousness of the variants.
Data on the frequency of each DNAJC13 variant was extracted from public databases (Exome
Aggregation Consortium (ExAC), 1000 Genomes Project, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing
78
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
5
Project – Exome Variant Server). Only variants with high coverage and read quality were
included in the analysis. All detected mutations were validated with Sanger sequencing in
samples identified as carriers by MIPs.
Statistical Analysis
The association between DNAJC13 variants and PD was analyzed using a binary logistic
regression with the status (patient or control) as a dependent variable, and age and sex as
covariates. Since there was no difference in DNAJC13 variant frequencies between the two
control groups (elderly and young) and between men and women, we also used Fisher’s Exact
Test to examine the association between all DNAJC13 mutations combined or private DNAJC13
variants and PD. To perform a combined analysis of the p.R1516H and p.L2170W variants, we
performed a meta-analysis by using an R package (Metafor).(Wolfgang, 2010) Cochran-Mantel-
Haenszel test was used to pool the studies and calculate the odds ratios (OR) with a fixed-effect
model. Tarone's test was applied to estimate heterogeneity. All other statistical analysis was
performed using the SPSS V2.1 software (IBM Inc.).
Results
A total of 42 non-synonymous variants in DNAJC13 were found in patients and controls (Table
1), including four common variants (allele frequency > 0.01 in our controls or in the 1000
Genomes Project and ExAC databases) and 38 rare variants. The combined frequency of rare
variants was nearly identical in patients and controls (11.7% vs. 11.8%, respectively, OR=0.99,
95% CI = 0.70 – 1.41, p=1.0). The purported causal variant, p.N855S,(Vilarino-Guell, et al.,
2014) was not identified in any of our cases or controls. Two variants that were previously
reported to be associated with PD risk, p.R1516H and p.L2170W, were observed in 2 (0.4%)
patients and 6 (0.9%) controls, and 9 (1.7%) patients and 5 (0.7%) controls, respectively (Table
91096
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
6
1, p>0.05 for both variants). Carriers of the p.R1516H variant had an average age of 55 for
patients and 38.8 for controls, while carriers of the p.L2170W variant had an average age of 63
for patients and 41.8 for controls. A combined analysis of these two variants using both the
present study and the different populations in the first study(Gustavsson, et al., 2015) (Table 2)
showed an OR of 0.32 (95%CI=0.15-0.68, p=0.0037, p for heterogeneity = 0.16) for p.R1516H
and an OR of 2.68 (95%CI=1.32-5.42, p=0.007, p for heterogeneity = 0.83) for p.L2170W. We
further examined whether variants that are predicted to be deleterious by both SIFT and
PolyPhen2 are associated with PD. Among PD patients, 53 (10.0%) carried such mutations and
among controls 56 carried a predicted deleterious variant (8.1%, p>0.05).
Discussion
None of the variants found in our cohort was independently associated with PD. However, two
variants, p.L2170W and p.R1516H, had similar frequencies and risk direction as previously
reported, and meta-analyses of these variants suggested that they may have a role in PD
susceptibility. The meta-analysis included our population, and three populations that were
previously published (Gustavsson, et al., 2015). These populations included a discovery cohort
of 201 PD patients and 194 controls from Canada, an additional population of 1042 PD patients
and 497 controls from Canada, and 920 PD patients and 635 controls from Norway. The size of
the current control population (n=692) is larger than the published individual control
populations, and our patient population (n=528) is in-between the smallest and the largest PD
populations, thus adding a substantial amount of patients and controls for the meta-analysis.
Other studies in Caucasian (Lorenzo-Betancor, et al., 2015) and Chinese (Foo, et al., 2014)
populations did not identify these variants, since they genotyped specific exons or variants that
did not include p.L2170W and p.R1516H. The initially reported mutation, p.N855S, was not
1112
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
7
found in our cohort, suggesting that while this variant may be causative for PD in other
ethnicities,(Gustavsson, et al., 2015) it is probably not a an important cause of PD in French
Canadians/French. The original family in which the p.N855S variant was identified was of
Dutch–German–Russian Mennonite ancestry;(Vilarino-Guell, et al., 2014) it has been shown that
p.N855S mutation is not a cause of PD in Caucasians,(Lorenzo-Betancor, et al., 2015) suggesting
that even between similar ethnic groups there could be differences in genetic causes of PD. In
addition, our study identified several rare and novel variants in the DNAJC13 gene. However,
many of these were non-informative (only observed in one patient or control), or were not
significantly associated with PD. Therefore, these variants need to be studied in additional
populations in order to reach conclusions as to the role of DNAJC13 in PD pathogenesis. A
previous sequencing study of GBA mutations that included 212 patients and 190 controls from
the current study was performed, and none of the carriers of GBA mutations was a carrier of
either p.L2170W or p.R1516H. Therefore, it is unlikely that GBA mutations had an effect on the
current study results, and further studies are needed to determine if there is any association or
interaction between GBA and DNAJC13 in PD. The DNAJC13 gene has previously been shown
to be highly conserved across species.(Girard, et al., 2005,Gustavsson, et al., 2015,Vilarino-
Guell, et al., 2014) While this may suggest that variations in the gene result in non-tolerated
functional changes, it is possible that these mutations are exceedingly rare and difficult to
associate with pathological changes.
DNAJC13 is a component of the retromer complex involved in the endosomal-lysosomal
retrograde pathway,(Girard, et al., 2005,Seaman and Freeman, 2014) and aids in localization of
the WASH complex in the endosomal pathway for substrate recognition.(Perrett, et al., 2015)
1314
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
8
Several components of the retromer endosomal recycling pathway were associated with
Parkinson’s disease, in addition to LRRK2, VPS35, and RAB29, that were previously
mentioned. Variants in the promoter of RAB7L1 (RAB29), were demonstrated to reduce the risk
for PD.(Gan-Or, et al., 2012,Guo, et al., 2014,Pihlstrom, et al., 2015) In addition, it was
demonstrated that LRRK2 mutations or knockdown of either VPS35 or RAB7L1 leads to the
impairment of this pathway and to lysosomal dysfunction.(MacLeod, et al., 2013,Miura, et al.,
2014) Genome wide association studies identified variants in a locus that includes the GAK gene,
(Pankratz, et al., 2009,Rhodes, et al., 2011) encoding for a G-associated kinase that recruits
chaperones to clathrin-coated vesicles in the retromer endosomal recycling pathway (Park, et al.,
2015). Similarly, DNAJC6, implicated in atypical juvenile Parkinsonism and encoding the
auxilin protein,(Edvardson, et al., 2012) is also involved in chaperone recruitment to clathrin-
coated vesicles. DNAJC13 (RME-8) localizes to endosomal membranes and is involved in
regulation of vesicles in the retromer endosomal recycling pathway.(Girard, et al., 2005) The
importance of this pathway in PD pathology is further supported by the possible association of
DNAJC13 variants with PD risk.
Our study has several limitations. The control population is not age and sex matched,
which may reduce our ability to detect genetic variants that are associated with PD. However,
since DNAJC13 mutations are mostly rare, these differences are less likely to affect the results.
Furthermore, the regression model was adjusted for age and sex when analyzing the cumulative
burden of DNAJC13 mutations in patients and controls. The age of carriers for both p.R1516H
and p.L2170W variants was younger in controls than in patients, which may impact the
penetrance of the variants; however, in the case of p.L2170W, if controls will develop PD in the
future, it will strengthen the association. If controls with the p.R1516H variant will develop PD,
it will reduce the association. Therefore, follow-up studies will be needed to determine the exact
1516
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
9
risk associated with these variants. Haplotype analysis was not performed on our samples, but
given the difference in ethnicity and that several haplotypes exist for DNAJC13 mutation
carriers,(Gustavsson, et al., 2015,Vilarino-Guell, et al., 2014) it is likely that our cohort does not
overlap with those previously reported.
Overall, the results presented here provide additional support, although minor, to the
hypothesis that DNAJC13 may be associated with PD. It is clear, however, that if indeed
DNAJC13 has a role in PD it is probably only relevant to a very small number of PD patients. On
the other hand, the fact that numerous PD-associated genes converge into the autophagy
lysosomal and retromer endosomal recycling pathways highlights their importance in PD, which
may lead to the development of novel treatments for PD.
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients and controls for their participation in the study. This work was financially
supported by the Michael J. Fox Foundation. ZGO is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship
from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). GAR holds a Canada Research Chair
in Genetics of the Nervous System and the Wilder Penfield Chair in Neurosciences. We thank
Daniel Rochefort, Pascale Hince, Helene Catoire, Cynthia Bourassa, Pierre Provencher, Cathy
Mirarchi and Vessela Zaharieva for their assistance. We thank the Quebec Parkinson’s Network
and its members (http://rpq-qpn.ca/) for their collaboration.
1718
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
10
References
Adzhubei, I.A., Schmidt, S., Peshkin, L., Ramensky, V.E., Gerasimova, A., Bork, P., Kondrashov, A.S., Sunyaev, S.R. 2010. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 7(4), 248-9. doi:10.1038/nmeth0410-248.
Appel-Cresswell, S., Rajput, A.H., Sossi, V., Thompson, C., Silva, V., McKenzie, J., Dinelle, K., McCormick, S.E., Vilarino-Guell, C., Stoessl, A.J., Dickson, D.W., Robinson, C.A., Farrer, M.J., Rajput, A. 2014. Clinical, positron emission tomography, and pathological studies of DNAJC13 p.N855S Parkinsonism. Mov Disord 29(13), 1684-7. doi:10.1002/mds.26019.
Davydov, E.V., Goode, D.L., Sirota, M., Cooper, G.M., Sidow, A., Batzoglou, S. 2010. Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput Biol 6(12), e1001025. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001025.
Edvardson, S., Cinnamon, Y., Ta-Shma, A., Shaag, A., Yim, Y.I., Zenvirt, S., Jalas, C., Lesage, S., Brice, A., Taraboulos, A., Kaestner, K.H., Greene, L.E., Elpeleg, O. 2012. A deleterious mutation in DNAJC6 encoding the neuronal-specific clathrin-uncoating co-chaperone auxilin, is associated with juvenile parkinsonism. PLoS One 7(5), e36458. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036458.
Foo, J.N., Liany, H., Tan, L.C., Au, W.L., Prakash, K.M., Liu, J., Tan, E.K. 2014. DNAJ mutations are rare in Chinese Parkinson's disease patients and controls. Neurobiol Aging 35(4), 935 e1-2. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.018.
Gan-Or, Z., Bar-Shira, A., Dahary, D., Mirelman, A., Kedmi, M., Gurevich, T., Giladi, N., Orr-Urtreger, A. 2012. Association of sequence alterations in the putative promoter of RAB7L1 with a reduced parkinson disease risk. Arch Neurol 69(1), 105-10. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.924.
Girard, M., Poupon, V., Blondeau, F., McPherson, P.S. 2005. The DnaJ-domain protein RME-8 functions in endosomal trafficking. J Biol Chem 280(48), 40135-43. doi:10.1074/jbc.M505036200.
Guo, X.Y., Chen, Y.P., Song, W., Zhao, B., Cao, B., Wei, Q.Q., Ou, R.W., Yang, Y., Yuan, L.X., Shang, H.F. 2014. An association analysis of the rs1572931 polymorphism of the RAB7L1 gene in Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and multiple system atrophy in China. Eur J Neurol 21(10), 1337-43. doi:10.1111/ene.12490.
Gustavsson, E.K., Trinh, J., Guella, I., Vilarino-Guell, C., Appel-Cresswell, S., Stoessl, A.J., Tsui, J.K., McKeown, M., Rajput, A., Rajput, A.H., Aasly, J.O., Farrer, M.J. 2015. DNAJC13 genetic variants in parkinsonism. Mov Disord 30(2), 273-8. doi:10.1002/mds.26064.
Hughes, A.J., Daniel, S.E., Kilford, L., Lees, A.J. 1992. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 55(3), 181-4.
Kumar, P., Henikoff, S., Ng, P.C. 2009. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4(7), 1073-81. doi:10.1038/nprot.2009.86.
Li, H., Durbin, R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14), 1754-60. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324.
Lorenzo-Betancor, O., Ogaki, K., Soto-Ortolaza, A.I., Labbe, C., Walton, R.L., Strongosky, A.J., van Gerpen, J.A., Uitti, R.J., McLean, P.J., Springer, W., Siuda, J., Opala, G., Krygowska-Wajs, A., Barcikowska, M., Czyzewski, K., McCarthy, A., Lynch, T., Puschmann, A., Rektorova, I., Sanotsky, Y., Vilarino-Guell, C., Farrer, M.J., Ferman, T.J., Boeve, B.F., Petersen, R.C., Parisi, J.E., Graff-Radford, N.R., Dickson, D.W., Wszolek, Z.K., Ross, O.A. 2015. DNAJC13 p.Asn855Ser mutation screening in Parkinson's disease and pathologically confirmed Lewy body disease patients. Eur J Neurol 22(9), 1323-5. doi:10.1111/ene.12770.
1920
213
214
215
216217218219220221222223224225226227228229230231232233234235236237238239240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254255256257258
11
MacLeod, D.A., Rhinn, H., Kuwahara, T., Zolin, A., Di Paolo, G., McCabe, B.D., Marder, K.S., Honig, L.S., Clark, L.N., Small, S.A., Abeliovich, A. 2013. RAB7L1 interacts with LRRK2 to modify intraneuronal protein sorting and Parkinson's disease risk. Neuron 77(3), 425-39. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.033.
McKenna, A., Hanna, M., Banks, E., Sivachenko, A., Cibulskis, K., Kernytsky, A., Garimella, K., Altshuler, D., Gabriel, S., Daly, M., DePristo, M.A. 2010. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20(9), 1297-303. doi:10.1101/gr.107524.110.
Miura, E., Hasegawa, T., Konno, M., Suzuki, M., Sugeno, N., Fujikake, N., Geisler, S., Tabuchi, M., Oshima, R., Kikuchi, A., Baba, T., Wada, K., Nagai, Y., Takeda, A., Aoki, M. 2014. VPS35 dysfunction impairs lysosomal degradation of alpha-synuclein and exacerbates neurotoxicity in a Drosophila model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis 71, 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.07.014.
O'Roak, B.J., Vives, L., Fu, W., Egertson, J.D., Stanaway, I.B., Phelps, I.G., Carvill, G., Kumar, A., Lee, C., Ankenman, K., Munson, J., Hiatt, J.B., Turner, E.H., Levy, R., O'Day, D.R., Krumm, N., Coe, B.P., Martin, B.K., Borenstein, E., Nickerson, D.A., Mefford, H.C., Doherty, D., Akey, J.M., Bernier, R., Eichler, E.E., Shendure, J. 2012. Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders. Science 338(6114), 1619-22. doi:10.1126/science.1227764.
Pankratz, N., Wilk, J.B., Latourelle, J.C., DeStefano, A.L., Halter, C., Pugh, E.W., Doheny, K.F., Gusella, J.F., Nichols, W.C., Foroud, T., Myers, R.H., Psg, P., GenePd Investigators, C., Molecular Genetic, L. 2009. Genomewide association study for susceptibility genes contributing to familial Parkinson disease. Hum Genet 124(6), 593-605. doi:10.1007/s00439-008-0582-9.
Park, B.C., Yim, Y.I., Zhao, X., Olszewski, M.B., Eisenberg, E., Greene, L.E. 2015. The clathrin-binding and J-domains of GAK support the uncoating and chaperoning of clathrin by Hsc70 in the brain. J Cell Sci 128(20), 3811-21. doi:10.1242/jcs.171058.
Perrett, R.M., Alexopoulou, Z., Tofaris, G.K. 2015. The endosomal pathway in Parkinson's disease. Mol Cell Neurosci 66(Pt A), 21-8. doi:10.1016/j.mcn.2015.02.009.
Pihlstrom, L., Rengmark, A., Bjornara, K.A., Dizdar, N., Fardell, C., Forsgren, L., Holmberg, B., Larsen, J.P., Linder, J., Nissbrandt, H., Tysnes, O.B., Dietrichs, E., Toft, M. 2015. Fine mapping and resequencing of the PARK16 locus in Parkinson's disease. J Hum Genet 60(7), 357-62. doi:10.1038/jhg.2015.34.
Rhodes, S.L., Sinsheimer, J.S., Bordelon, Y., Bronstein, J.M., Ritz, B. 2011. Replication of GWAS associations for GAK and MAPT in Parkinson's disease. Ann Hum Genet 75(2), 195-200. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.2010.00616.x.
Seaman, M., Freeman, C.L. 2014. Analysis of the Retromer complex-WASH complex interaction illuminates new avenues to explore in Parkinson disease. Commun Integr Biol 7, e29483. doi:10.4161/cib.29483.
Vilarino-Guell, C., Rajput, A., Milnerwood, A.J., Shah, B., Szu-Tu, C., Trinh, J., Yu, I., Encarnacion, M., Munsie, L.N., Tapia, L., Gustavsson, E.K., Chou, P., Tatarnikov, I., Evans, D.M., Pishotta, F.T., Volta, M., Beccano-Kelly, D., Thompson, C., Lin, M.K., Sherman, H.E., Han, H.J., Guenther, B.L., Wasserman, W.W., Bernard, V., Ross, C.J., Appel-Cresswell, S., Stoessl, A.J., Robinson, C.A., Dickson, D.W., Ross, O.A., Wszolek, Z.K., Aasly, J.O., Wu, R.M., Hentati, F., Gibson, R.A., McPherson, P.S., Girard, M., Rajput, M., Rajput, A.H., Farrer, M.J. 2014. DNAJC13 mutations in Parkinson disease. Hum Mol Genet 23(7), 1794-801. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddt570.
Wang, K., Li, M., Hakonarson, H. 2010. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 38(16), e164. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq603.
Wolfgang, V. 2010. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(3), 1-48.
2122
259260261262263264265266267268269270271272273274275276277278279280281282283284285286287288289290291292293294295296297298299300301302303304305
306
12
Table 1. Rare and common DNAJC13 Variants in PD patients and controls
Variant SIFT PolyPhen2GERP+
+ Freq. 1K Freq. ExAC Patients (n=528) Controls (n=692)Rare variants
p.T66M 0.27 0.993 4.52 0.0000569 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%)p.R73C 0.02 0.999 5.4 0.00013 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.N141I 0 0.25 4.64 0.0000569 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.K225R 0.36 0.982 5.6 0.00000813 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.L318F 0.01 0.994 5.98 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.G416A 0.4 0.006 5.86 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.A423V 0.41 0.848 5.86 0.000599 0.00022 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.H521D 0.03 0.044 5.29 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.R654C 0 1 5.53 0.0000163 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.D674A 0.11 0.888 5.76 0.0002 0.000277 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.N695S 0.47 0.009 2.07 0.00000813 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.I738V 0.55 0 -1.5 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.1%)p.E789Q 0.12 0.998 5.59 0.0000163 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.S790Y 0.01 0.553 5.59 0.004393 0.00513 10 (1.9%) 7 (1.0%)p.T944S 0.12 0.956 5.78 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
p.R1118C 0 1 5.78 0.00000813 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.G1133D 0.01 1 5.65 0.0000651 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.3%)p.I1272V 0.06 0.734 6.07 0.0002 0.0000813 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.E1291G 0.03 0.995 5.64 0.002995 0.00444 8 (1.5%) 10 (1.4%)p.N1307Y 0.01 0.272 3.18 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.3%)p.Q1312R 0.12 0.383 5.64 0.00000813 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.P1366S 0.27 1 5.26 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.3%)p.R1400Q 0.16 0.103 5.32 0.000399 0.000179 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.R1462H 0.22 0 3.37 0.005591 0.00913 5 (1.0%) 13 (1.9%)p.S1482G 0.16 0.329 5.86 0.00000813 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.V1483A 0.2 0.214 5.86 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.R1516H 0.07 0.521 3.6 0.001398 0.00189 2 (0.4%) 6 (0.9%)p.T1895M 0.23 0.007 5.2 0.000599 0.00157 2 (0.4%) 3 (0.4%)p.N1952T 0.51 0.008 3.46 0.005591 0.00163 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.1%)p.Q1954R 0.72 0 -3.12 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.V1995L 0.06 0.977 5.25 0.001597 0.00116 3 (0.6%) 5 (0.7%)p.L2027F 0.03 0.006 3.9 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.3%)p.A2057S 0.5 0.126 5.98 0.000399 0.000805 3 (0.6%) 4 (0.6%)p.V2125L 0.11 0.196 5.34 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)p.L2170W 0.03 0.999 5.45 0.00234 9 (1.7%) 5 (0.7%)p.Y2206H 0.01 1 5.96 1 (0.2%) 2 (0.3%)p.M2225I 0.39 0 3.29 0.009984 0.00912 3 (0.6%) 9 (1.3%)p.S2226A 1 0.003 4.27 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%)
Common variantsp.A1421V 0.01 0.998 5.42 0.01278 0.018 23 (4.4%) 26 (3.8%)p.A1463S 1 0 5.17 0.739018 0.569 365 (69.5%) 489 (70.8%)
2324
307
13
p.P1515S 0.16 0.044 5.81 0.011981 0.021 36 (6.9%) 32 (4.6%)p.Y1673C 0.06 0.992 5.75 0.024161 0.045 68 (13.0%) 91 (12.2%)
Threshold values for deleteriousness: SIFT – less than 0.05, Polyphen2 – greater than 0.86. GERP++ is a score for the conservation of the amino acid, scores > 3 can be considered as highly conserved. Freq. 1K, frequency in the 1000 genomes project; Freq. ExAC, frequency in the ExAC database.
2526
308
309310311312
313
314