veronika kovacsova-master of urbanism-urban permeability
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
1
Urban permeability:On plants and plinths
Graduation ProjectUrban DesignAmsterdam Academy of Architecture2013/2014
Veronika Kovácsová
2
Graduation project committee
Donald van Dansik, MSc.E vandansik[at]gmx[dot]comIndependant consultant for masterplanning and project management, Associate Space Group, tutor Academy of Architecture Amsterdam
Lisette Klok, Dr. ir. (TNO)E lisette[dot]klok[at]tno[dot]nlResearch Scientist Urban Environment, TNO
Sanda Lenzholzer, Dr. Dipl. Ing. MA(AA) (WUR)E sanda[dot]lenzholzer[at]wur[dot]nlAssistant Professor, Landscape Architecture group, Wageningen University, landscape architect and urban designer
External advisors
Erik Meinharter, Dl. E meinharter[at]plansinn[dot]atLandscape designer, partner at PlanSinn, expert on urban climate(Plansinn - Office for Planning and Communication, Vienna)
Zuzana Hudeková, Ing. PhD. E rec[at]changenet[dot]skLandscape architect and expert on (local) urban climate (Regional Environmental Centre, Bratislava)
Student
Veronika KovacsovaMaster Urban Design Amsterdam Academy of ArchitectureGraduation project presentation: 12/2013
E: [email protected]: www.facebook.com/urbanclimate
This booklet has been published in January 2014
4 5
ThIS GRADUATION PROjECT IS TACkLING
EcOLOGIcAL AnD SOcIAL PrOcESSES
ThAT AFFECT URBAN CLIMATE* * Urban climate covers:
- influence of natural factors (sun, exchange of radiation, air, hu-midity of air, temperature, wind, precipitation (rain and snow), and electric interchange processes in their multiple combinations
- modifications caused by the town (shape, height, volume, posi-tion, layout, arrangement of buildings and groups of buildings)
- repercussions of human activities on the climate (in reference with ecology, management of land, water, air, water and air pollution
6 7
The human civilisation is becoming ever more urban. With the growing densification in our cit-ies, green and open (public) spaces are put under pressure. As the number of built, non-permeable surfaces (such as asphalt and concrete) increase, storm water absorption, biodiversity and a pleas-ant microclimate in our cities is threatened. All non-permeable materials contribute to extreme water conditions in the city (low ground water lev-el or flooding) and to the so called 'urban heat is-land' effect. Alongside with this development, the number and quality of public spaces is put under pressure. How do we provide the necessary built urban environment (housing, infrastructure) of a growing city, and at the same time enhance and offer lively, inclusive public spaces with a comfort-able microclimate?
introduction
8 9
INCREASING AMOUNT OF
PEOPLE LIVING IN URBAN AREAS
More people using less and more compact space
Growing use of (non-renewable) resources
. . .
10 11
INCREASING WORLD POPULATION*
* Source: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division,World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision (2007)
65%
35%
rural
urban
50%
50%
30%
70%
205020101970
12 13
PhYSICALGROWTh
=
hORIZONTAL
VERTICAL
14 15
problems & challenges
37.8°C (afternoon)
urban heat island effectheat stressmore extreme conditions: drought, floods, ...
16 17
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 26.7°C
29.4°C
32.2°C
35°C
37.8°C
Relative huminity Temperature
less hazard-ous, adaptive body tem-perature
caution
danger
heat stress
When it‘s over 35°C outside, I rather do not leave my apart-ment.
nausea, vomiting, headaches, and low blood pressure and the latter can lead to fainting or dizziness
heat stress / hyperther-mia - occurs when a body produces or absorbs more heat than it dis-sipates
33.5°C
31.5°C
31°C
32°C
33°C
34°C35°C
36°C36.7°C
urban heat island effect
Temperature in densely built centres from 1-10 °C higher, 10% less humidity and 30% weaker wind than in surrounding countryside
18 19
effects of materialisation
stormwater infiltration
disability to filtratewater leading to droughts and floods
stormwater run-off
effects of materialisation
20 21
all temperatures self-measured with an infrared thermometer (see device and measurements further)
VARIOUS TEMPERATURES IN ThE CITY INFLUENCING ThE hUMAN CLIMATE COMFORT*
22°c
25°c
46°c
56°c
30°c
tar, bitumen
soil
greenwet/in shadow
greenin sun26°c
asphalt/concrete in the sun
asphalt/concrete in the shadow
29°cair temperature
effects of materialisation
* the acceptance of public spaces in various microclimatatic cond-tions, including sunshine, shade or wind
22 23
urban climate comfort
TEMPERATURE 22°C (when dressed)WIND SPEED 1.5M/S - 1.8M/ShUMIDITY 30% - 60%
(Lenzholzer, 2009)
Climatological factors such as sun, temperature, wind and humidity largely influence our behaviour in and usage of public spaces, and they even determine why we like to stay in certain places more than others. They have an effect on how we feel, how ‘comfortable’ the cir-cumstances of being outdoors are. human comfort is a subjective concept. In a public urban environ-ment it has to do with people’s ac-ceptance of spaces and their condi-tions.
More on human comfort here:
http://urbanclimate.stadachtig.nl/humancomfort/ andhttp://urbanclimate.stadachtig.nl/the-social-life-of-small-urban-spaces/
Man enjoy the breeze in MadeiraPhoto by Leen Vanthuyne
People walking in the shadow in Bratislava
24 25
“This is the plaza of the Seagram building in New York in the morning. With a time lapse camera we were test-ing a hypothesis. The sun – we were pretty sure – would be the chief factor determining where people would sit or not sit. Now, just after 12, they begin to sit. Right where the sun is! I was enormously pleased with a per-fectly splendid correlation. It was quiet misleading as we’ll see later, but it was a very encouraging way to start.”
0:35 – 1:06
The very first sentence of THE SOCIAL LIFE OF SMALL URBAN SPACES, a documentary from 1980 by William h. Whyte, who was an was an American urbanist, organizational analyst, journalist and people-watcher (Wikipedia).
“There was a very strong correlation between sitters and sun. That was in May. As the time went on: June, July, August. The correlation vanished. People sat any-where – sun or shade.”
26 27
28 29
30 31
location
Vienna = 66km
Budapest = 200km
Prague = 329km
EU
Bratislava
POPULAtIOn GrOwtH PrOjEctIOnS
2011 462.6032025 459.828 -0.6%
Mid-sized capitalpopulation size stagnating or slowly decreasing (low birth rate & greying) SOURCE: http://www.infostat.sk/vdc/pdf/pub-likaciaproj.pdf)
32 33
The urban fabric (built environment), like in many other post-communist cities, has to a cer-tain extent gone through degradation. The city does not grow and develop hand-in-hand with its ecological and climatological processes. The surrounding green hills and vineyards are grad-ually turning into housing projects of private de-velopers. The city does not have a central park, and only very few urban parks which are threat-ened to turn into asphalt squares or under-ground parking lots. Reduction in green perme-able areas of cities is one of the main causes for the increasing urban temperature, poor storm water management and decreasing air quality. Also, the city currently does not have any legisla-tive regulation on the protection of green areas in urban areas, as well as a economically sus-tainable strategy to create and maintain exist-ing and new green infrastructure in the city.
low or no maintenance of elements in public space
low or no maintenance of green spaces (no watering)
Degrading public space in central Bratislava: Freedom Square / Namestie Slodoby
degrading materialisation non-functioning / broken public fountain
34 35
OPEn SPAcE
Forests and urban parks
Agriculture
Water
the city does not have a central park, and only very few urban parks which are threatened to turn into asphalt squares or underground parking lots.
36 37
reduction in green per-meable areas of cities is one of the main causes for the urban heat island effect, poor storm water management, decreas-ing air quality and biodi-versity.
BUILt SPAcE / Sealed land in %
>80%
50 - 80%
30 - 50%
10 - 30%
<10%
Industry
Airport
38 39
Measurements:19.08.201312:00 -14:00Sunny
UrBAn HEAt ISLAnD EffEct In BrAtISLAVA
33.5°C
15km
31.5°C
31°C
32°C
33°C
34°C35°C
36°C36.7°C
Only 6% of the total surface of Old Town is open and green, while the European average is 35% (de Roo, 2011) within an direct urban living environment. This dominant non-permeable surface area is supporting the development of the urban heat island effect.
Open / green space in the city
Old Town Petrzalka
40 41
SOIL tyPES
loam
sandy-loam
loamy-sand
1 2
1
2
GrOUnD wAtEr LEVELAUGUSt - OctOBEr 2010 (MAxIMUMS)
5,8 – 8,7 m
6,5 – 7,5 m
1, 5m
1, 3 -1 ,4m
42 43
tO ADAPtAtIOn
FROM ADjUSTMENT
"who wants to escape the heat and temperatures be-low 30 degrees, must go to altitudes well over 1,200 and 1,300 meters. Escape from the heat into the hills - something that in the course of human-induced climate change you will probably have to adjust more often in future."(Rainer Schultheis, ORF-Weatherreditorial, 17.08.2012;http://orf.at/stories/2135932/2135927/)
44 45
cOLLEctIVE rISK
COOPERATIVE BEhAVIOR
COLLECTIVE SOCIAL MOVEMENT
„The world has warmed by 1.4 de-grees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius) since the Industrial Revolution, with most of the rise in temperature co-ming since the 1970s. Such rapid war-ming is unprecedented over at least 20,000 years.“
http://www.priweb.org/globalchange/climat-echange/globalwarming/gw_05.html
may well have seen it all, but certainly have not
We have to adapt, think and apply new strategies of DEGrOwtH, ‘business as usual‘ way of production and consumption has to end
New chance to slow down and reflect, use existing ASSEtS and smartly transforming and updating them
46 47
It seems that every year the local municipality is cutting costs in maintenance of public spaces, resulting in transformation of green open surfaces into lower maintenance paved squares or demolished public elements or facilities such as fountains, pavement materials, benches. With the current economic situation and lack of finances, we tend to forget that we have at hand unused, even renewable re-sources: climatological (such as storm water, wind or sun energy) and social (sharing tools and skills).
Ideas Money
€Progress
City administration
How can the vast green carpets, avoided overheated squares and street be utilized while preserving and improving the belov-ed ecological structure and characteristics of the area?
48 49
Setting ground and establishing public-private partnership could offer a new strategy for the city as a step towards a more resilient and re-sourceful city. The city would save costs by collecting storm water (less load on the drainage system and stored water to be used for watering the parks in the hot summer months) in the maintenance and create at-tractive cooling urban spaces, when existing resources - human capital and natural renewable resources - are smartly utilized.
Bratislava citizens
By letting the people adopt and re-create the green spaces between their buildings. they will feel more respon-sible and connected to their living environ-ment.
50 51
The public-private partnership between the city and citizens or local ini-tiatives would create a platform where both parties would decide and be responsible in creating, protecting and maintaining urban open spaces (for instance proposing new permeable spaces or planting new and protecting existing trees or repairing existing public fountains and installing new drinking water taps in urban 'hot-spots').
PUBLIC PRIVATE
Partnership between the public administration and the citizens based on mutual responsibility and shared maintenance
52 53
concept
urban permeability
concept of urban permeability, influencing not only human comfort but also climate resilience in urban spaces. On one hand the aforementioned open, breathing, absorbing and cooling green spaces in cities, on the other hand accessible, inclusive, lively plinths and the public space formed by and in-between them acting as catalysts of social interaction.
vertical(open plinths and spaces of face-to-face interaction)
horizontal(open surface for storm water to be ab-sorbed and to cool the urban environment)
54 55
research & analysis
research & analysisPArt 1
Besides scientific reserach literature on ur-ban climate and geomorphological loca-tion analisys, one of the starting points of this work was setting up open online plat-forms establishing dialogue, exchange of knowledge, experience, ideas and feedback directly from those who have personal everyday experience with urban climate within the built environment - the citizens (in some questions diretly focused on Bratislavans).
BLOG http://urbanclimate.stadachtig.nlfacebook Page http://www.facebook.com/urbanclimate
56 57
37 unique voters total of 44 votes
ANSWERS: importance of shadow, green spaces and presence of water & ‘beer’, ‘hot girls with mini-skirts’, ‘free Club Mate’, ‘seating’ or ‘pub’
what do you appreciate in public space the most during a hot summer day in the city?
More on: http://urbanclimate.sta-dachtig.nl/rounding-off-question-1/
58 59
+/- 20 PLACES22 RESPONDENTS
8 x
6 x
3 x
3 x
where can we find you during a hot summer day in the city?*
* (focused on citizens and visitors of Bratislava)More on: http://urbanclimate.stadachtig.nl/mapping-urban-comfort-bratislava/
Selection of the OPEN SOURCE MAP
mostly missed: water in city centre in form of fountains
60 61
OBc
HO
Dn
Ast
reet
frEE
DO
M
squa
re
MA
In s
quar
e
* (focused on citizens and visitors of Bratislava)* (focused on citizens and visitors of Bratislava)
which public places in Bratislava are avoided during the hot summer days?*
12
3
1
2
OBChODNAstreet
FREEDOMsquare
62 63
grassfelt as the coldest element of the square
marmorused partly as the facade of the building (Tesco)
clay soilfelt some heat absorpti-on
light color plastered facadefelt very nice and refreshing, an example that light colors absorb less heat than darker colors
natural stoneused partly in the facade of a residential building. Felt surprisingly hot.
asphaltthe surface of the square felt very hot
Location: kamenne Namestie, BratislavaDate / Time: 27.04.2013 / 17:00Air temperature: 25°C
Second stage of my research and data col-lection included 1) subjective experien-tial / qualitative measurement of outdoor materialsand 2) objective quantitative urban cli-mate data collection (with the help of an anemometer and infrared thermometer) and 3) qualitative demographic data col-lection
Subjective experiential / qualitative measurement of outdoor materials
research & analysisPArt 2
64 65
Quantitative data collection with the help of an infrared thermometer measuring temperature of materials
Quantitative data collection with the help of an anemometer (measuring air temperature and wind velocity)
66 67
% 65+ (2025)% 65+ (2012)
2010 2025
I (Old Town)0 - 14 12% 10% -2%15-64 69% 61% -8%65+ 19% 29% +10%II0 - 14 13% 12% -1%15-64 70% 66% -4%65+ 17% 22% +5%III0 - 14 12% 12% -15-64 70% 64% -6%65+ 18% 24% +6%IV0 - 14 13% 13% -15-64 73% 66% -7%65+ 14% 21% +7%V (Petrzalka) 0 - 14 12% 14% +2%15-64 81% 60,5% -20,5%65+ 7% 25,5 +18,5
Qualitative demographic data collectionpopulation by age in 2012 and 2025
(Together with children and pregnant wo-men), I belong to the popula-tion vulnerable to urban heat.
<15
20.1 - 2515.1 - 20
15.1 - 20
68 69
Sensitive areas: built and population
V (Petrzalka)
I (Old Town)
dense built mass = lively street life, but insufficient green space for a healthy microclimate and uninviting environment for fauna & flora
socially deteriorating area, where anonimity rules. There's lots of green, open spaces - lots of potential for a inviting microclimate and potential for a development of a better social life on a community level.
Qualitative demographic data collection
>3500
1500 - 3500500 - 1500
<500
V (Petrzalka)
I (Old Town)
population density 2012 (people per km2)
Old Town
Petrzalka
70 71
OLD tOwn
PEtrZALKA
Two totally different areas in Bratislava are studied and compared (Image 1). On one hand, a dense historical centre (Old Town) with scarce porous spaces and a vibrant social citylife; on the other hand a 1970s prefab mass-housing neigh-bourhood (Petržalka) with an excess of unused greenery, but a limited offer of vibrant public spaces for its inhabitants (Image 2). Both neighbourhoods have approximately the same density of in-habitants (around 4000/km2), however their urban fabric is totally different. Only 6% of the total surface of Old Town is open and green, while the European average is 35% (de Roo, 2011) within an direct urban living environment. This dominant non-permeable surface area is supporting the development of the urban heat island effect. Density of func-tions (shops, cafes, ...) on ground floors is highest in the whole Bratislava and is a foundation of a vibrant urban life. Petržalka, on contrary, has a high amount of ground vegetation (about 66%), open corridors for fresh air to enter, but a de-teriorating public life due to large dis-tances between buildings, disorientated planning and marginal social functions on ground level for people to pass by and meet.
what can a dense historical centre and a mass-housing neighbourhood learn from eachother?
72 73
Old Town Old Town
Freedom Square
Obchodnastreet
Petrzalka’s grass spaces
Petrzalka’s dead plinths as garage units
Petrzalka Petrzalka
SELEctIOn Of PUBLIc SPAcES
74 75
Many of the fountains in the Old town of Bratislava are out of order due to lack of finances for their maintenance. fountain on Freedom Square out of order since 2007
76 77
cars dominate on sidewalks, and sometimes hinder connection of pedestrians with the ground floor
undemocratic street-scape Petrzalka’s
dead plinths as garage units
78 79
excess of green surface / little shade / no maintenance
surface vegetation in Petrzalka, Bratislava
80 81
One of the most im-portant ingredients of urbanity, besides den-sity, is active participa-tion of the inhabitants in a community.
the need to meet in public spaces is slow-ly increasing, with the right and responsibility for public spaces. appropriation of public
green in Petrzalka (photographed in 2012)
privatisation of the ground floor (plinth) in Petrzalka(photographed in 2012)
82 83
19
Number of floors
12
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Built/sealed surface OLD tOwn
94%PEtrZALKA
49%
84 85
PEtrZALKA
Open/poroussurface OLD tOwn
6%(1.35m2 of green space per inhabitant)
51%39m2 of green space per inhabitant
86 87
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
Outdoor spaces to meet, sit and stay & functions
functions also open at night time (cafes, restau-rants, hotels)public functions (schools, libraries, doctors’s office, po-lice, cultur-al institu-tions, ...)
functions open dur-ing the day (cafes, res-taurants, hotels)
outdoor public space to meet, sit and stay
PEtrZALKAOLD tOwn
88 89
According to ‘The Green City Guidelines’, a pocket park (10-1000m2) should be reachable within 200m (4minutes walking) and a neighbour-hood park (1000-6000m2) within 400m (6minutes walking).
500mradius
Plinths as catalysators of social interaction in public space
A study and book by the dutch office Stipo, The City at Eye Level, suggests that public functions in plinths on a 15m distance (approximately 6-8 timer per 100m) contribute to a livable, socially interac-tive environment. Petržalka as a neighbourhood built in the 1970s – 1980s, is based on the princi-ple of functional segregation. Although density of public functions within the plinth varies, a shop, restaurant or a school pop up every 30 – 70m on a main street.
90 91
sites Old TownPerzalka
92 93
Learning from Petržalka: reconnecting urban with nature
Green, permeable surfaces form spaces in Petržalka do not only collect storm wa-ter (runoff storm water can be held up to 80%), but also cool off the surrounding urban spaces. Because the Old Town lacks these kinds of open spaces, a new strat-egy is needed to improve the (micro)cli-matological comfort of the city, but also to reconnect urban life with nature.
The most obvious method to introduce permeability is by opening sealed, non-porous surfaces in the city and adding new vegetation to support storm water collection, absorption, and contribute to a cooling effect during the hot sum-mer periods. In the Old Town, the open places with a permeable potential are the unused empty plots, parking lots, tram tracks and roofs of buildings. During the last two years, the first community gar-dens have been set up in Bratislava, on both public and private grounds. Many of them have been initiated by active citi-zens who have decided to take things into their own hands and transformed empty, unused voids in the city into a new public space for the people, a permeable space allowing water absorption and a green space offering shade and a cooling mi-croclimate.
The city administration and the citizens have to realize that it is never too late to improve their urban environment, and the scale of the interventions into the ex-isting urban fabric does not have to ex-ceed a couple of m2. Where there is no space for larger green areas, a solution of let storm water run-off or to be stored would be a simple tree-bed instead of a parking place (Benepe, 2013). Such a green pockets can store about 10.000 litres of storm water (Image 11) . Also, a fountain or public drinking water tap can improve the human comfort during hot summer days in the city. Many of the foun-tains in the Old Town of Bratislava are out of order due to lack of finances for their maintenance. So is since 2007 the largest fountain called “Unity” on the Freedom
fountains
roofs
Old Town Square (Image 12), which is considered in the hot summer days as one of the most unpleasant public spaces to be in the in the city1. This square went through a number of transformations in the last two centuries, covering up 64% of its surface with heat-radiating and non-permeable asphalt and concrete. With small scale interventions like collecting storm water into smartly enlargened existing green surfaces, forming volunteering groups for park management, maintenance and repairing the fountain with the help of lo-cal volunteering plumbers and engineers, the park will become not only more lively, but also a cooler public space
94 95
49
69
49
69
H
H
49
69
H
streetscape as anurban heat canyon
existing situation
Obchodna street
proposed situation
Old Town
6m4m 6m
summer sun winter sun
49
69
49
69
H
H
49
69
H
6m4m 6m
96 97
Phase 1: Sun sails
Linen sails for shade(overhead tram wires)
98 99
Phase 1: Sun sails / Visualisation
100 101
New bike path
Phase 2: Grapevine
Grapevines offering shade and drainage (wireless tram with inductive power transfer)
102 103
Phase 2: Grapevine / Visualisation
104 105
WATER DRAINAGE AND COLLECTION:= 4500m3 of volume = about 1500L of water capacity
3m (D)
1.5m (L)
1m (W)
Grapevine
height uptill 35m
106 107
Old Town
2013
Freedom square
2020+Freedom square
108 109
freedom square elevation
110 111
2-5°
8-9mground water
angle terrain
Profile 1 / Overview
Profile 1
112 113
Profile 1 / Detail 1 Profile 1 / Detail 2 water collection throught the concrete multi-use and -functional drainage
water collection throught unused urban assets: roofs
114 115
Profile 1 / Detail 3 Refreshment effect of the combination wind & fountain
116 117
Profile 2 / Overview
Profile 2
118 119
Profile 2 / Detail 1 Use of the concrete water drainage pool during ‚dry‘ day as a skating and sitting public area
Use of the concrete water drainage pool during ‚wet‘ day as a water storage or ice-skating rink (with temperatures below 0°C)
Profile 2 / Detail 2
120 121
Profile 2 / Detail 3 Movable chairs in de-elevated grass area give users the freedom and flexibility to position itself comfor-tably for sun, shade, shelter, meetings and events.
Water collected by drainage is stored in the central fountain of the square and is recycled.
Profile 2 / Detail 4
122 123
Profile 2 / Detail 5 Movable chairs in front of the cafe give users the freedom and flexibility to position itself comfortab-ly for sun, shade, meetings and events.
124 125
Development of freedom square
Built
are
a /
Impe
rmea
ble
surf
ace
1600Vineyard
100% 80% 57% 32% 36% 45%
1873Archbishop’s palace built
1940-1960’sModernism
1970’sParking place
1980-2014Square with large fountain, since 2007 out of order
2015+Enlargement of green open surface
Ope
n ar
ea /
Perm
eabl
e su
rfac
e
126 127
Viualisation 1 /freedom square
Use of the concrete water drainage pool during ‚wet‘ day as a water storage
December
May
junejuly
August
October
january
February
March
April
September
November
Storm water retention / Water storage basin
128 129
Viualisation 2 /freedom square
Use of the concrete water drainage pool during ‚dry‘ day as a skating and sitting public area
December
May
junejuly
August
September
October
November
january
February
March
April
Sport acties / Skatepark, jogging, events, ...
130 131
Loose chairs instead of fixed existing benched gives users the freedom to position itself best suited for sun / shade and events.
132 133
Viualisation 3 /freedom square
Use of the concrete water drainage pool during ‚wet‘ day as an ice-skating rink (with temperatures below 0°C)
Sport activities / Ice rink
December
May
junejuly
August
September
October
November
january
February
March
April
134 135
Learning from Old town: ur-banity through social action
A study and book by the Dutch office Stipo, The City at Eye Level (karssenberg 2013), suggests that public functions in plinths on a 15m distance (approximately 6-8 timer per 100m) contribute to a live-able, socially interactive environment. Petržalka as a neighbourhood built in the 1970s – 1980s, is based on the principle of functional segregation. Although density of public functions within the plinth var-ies, a shop, restaurant or a school pop up every 30 – 70m on a main street.
One can also experience a very undemo-cratic street-scape, where cars dominate on every sidewalk, and sometimes hinder any connection of the pedestrian with the ground floor (Image 6). As mentioned above, the area is characterized by an ex-cess of green public spaces, which the planners originally intended to be used for recreation. however, today this exces-sive grass land is mostly used only for tak-ing ones pet out for a wee . hence, in this case, quantity of green open spaces does not correspond with an equally high qual-ity. On the other hand, the green is the most valued characteristic by the inhab-itants of Petržalka, and protect it for in-stance against a top-down development
of a highway1. The question remains: how can the vast green carpets be utilized by the inhabitants? And could nature pos-sibly act as a catalyst of social change? Urbanity of the Old Town in Bratislava is achieved through density of the build en-vironment and the number of public func-tions which bring people not only socially but also physically together. But when buildings in a mass-housing neighbour-hood like Petržalka are sometimes tens of meters apart from another, it creates spaces difficult for social interaction - to see and hear one another from such dis-tances. What could be done to form these spaces between buildings into a motor of social interaction while preserving the beloved ecological structure and pleasant climatological characteristics of the area?
One of the most important ingredients of urbanity, besides density, is active par-ticipation of the inhabitants in a commu-nity. During the socialist times in Slovakia, the notion of the „empowered“ citizen was not common, as it resembled more someone’s private interest than the inter-est of a community. however, more and more people today are not only showing
1 http://petrzalka.otvorene.sk (Website only in Slovak, last accessed on july 24, 2013)
their increasing need to go out and meet in public spaces, but also demonstrating right and responsibility for public spaces.2
What does this have to do with climate resilience? By letting the people adopt and re-create the green spaces between their buildings, they will feel more re-sponsible and connected to their living environment (Image 8). Why not to plant an urban (food) forest into the vast green lands (slowing down but not blocking the air circulation coming into the city) (Im-age 9), tree nurseries or playgrounds and sport facilities (with permeable pavement and bioswales to capture storm water)? When programmed well, the vast grass areas can act as incubators of social ac-tion: form a network of green infrastruc-ture and attract people to access by foot or bicycle. The built environment would reconnect with the ecological and clima-tological processes of the city. Besides en-
2 Approximately since 2011, Bratislava has experienced a growing number of engaging civic communities based on volunteering such as ‘ Zelena hliadka’ (a well-networked, active group of citizens cleanig up specific locations in Bratislava on a daily basis; http://www.zelenahliadka.blog.sme.sk) or ‘Bratislavske dobrovolnicke centrum’ (a community around the newly reopened Old Markethall, offering ‘donation’ of people’s helping hands and skills; http://www.dobrovolnictvoba.sk).
Petržalka
136 137
Peržalka 2013 vironmental development, green urban areas offer health and social benefits and are considered as community builders, strengthening the social ties between the citizens.
Together with the development of a new green infrastructure, the current car-sidewalk-parking would gain back its role as pedestrian zone, along more open and accessible plinths. Permeability of facades is made possible through let-ting local entrepreneurs settle, allowing partial integration of the public (square, street, sidewalk) with the private (shop). This kind of development creates inter-action, broadens our understanding and experiencing of our urban environment. In Petržalka, the currently weak layer of semi-public spaces can be strengthened through supporting small neighbour-hood shops. Some of these already exist (Image 10), but because of strict regula-tions of a monofunctional zoning plan, private initiatives and local, small scale entrepreneurship are imposed with regu-lative barriers.
138 139
MANIFEsTO plAy PETRŽALKA!
MANIFEsTO plAy PETRŽALKA!1. PARTICIPATORY DESIGN Inhabitants have a say and can influ-ence and co-create the new meaning of the empty spaces.
2. OPENNESS, PUBLICNESS, ACCESS Applicants may propose anything that will be 'open': (e.g. an office, but should remain open to the public and encourage 'inside-outside' interaction)- if they decide to 'seal' a piece of land, it should be a) temporary or b) offer a compensation, solution that the building will add 'good' and give something back to the environment (collect and reuse storm water, col-lect and reuse waste, ...)
3. DIVERSTY The projects / new-use proposals should aim at needs and wants of all inhabitants of Petrzalka and be as varied and diverse as possible target group. Projects that include a variety of users and func-tions are prioritized.
4. PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 1-year contract with the city and the citizens. Both parties have responsibilities and a list of minimal 'deliverables' to ensure stability and fairness of the project during the process.
5. SEASONALITY AND ALL YEAR-ROUNDNESS Find and assign all season use (so not only summer, but also winter when it's cold and snow outside).
6. COLLABORATION Priority goes to projects that work together, where collaborations are created. (For instance to reduce costs and re-sources)
7. RESPONSIBILITY Applicants have to take responsibility, be pre-sent to build a community.
8. ZERO-CENT URBANISM There is NO BUDGET. However, there is a lot of freedom for urban pioneers (artists, cooks, …) to experiment outdoors or young architects to build and start their own studio.
140 141
empty grassfields
1 € / year
dead plinths
1€ / m2
Peržalka Pioneers Desire paths 2013
142 143
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT
fruit trees for shade and jams
hammocks and slacklines
new business: grow-ing vegetables for the supermarket
offices for start-upslibrary
neighbourhood vegetable gardens
movies and pop-up bistro
flower garden for elderly
local marketplace for barbeque
playground
local shopsoutdoor gym
urban meadow
Plot division Soil types
loam
sandy-loam
144 145
Petržalka 2020+ Petržalka
ACTIVATING ThE PUBLIC SPACE AND GRASS FIELDS
multifunctional playfield areaa
urban fruit forest
outdoor cinema
collective food production gardens
urban meadows
outdoor market
146 147
LIFE ExPECTANCY (years)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
W C A PF
Petržalka‘s urban forest
SIZE (meters)
AMOUNT (of trees)
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
Walnut
W
61 64
220280
320
Cherry
C
Apple
A
Peach
P
Fig
F
Seasonalisation of tree fruiting
December
May
junejuly
August
September
October
November
january
February
March
April
Cherry
a
Figs
Figb
Peach
c
Apple
d
Walnut
e
148 149
trees
220 new trees
Ecosystem services of a tree
shade/shelter
regulation of climate
flood protection
roots of trees are capturing storm water and helping to stabilize ground water level
clean watersoil fertility, stability and health
pollination habitat
150 151
Upgraded desire pathswater network
152 153
63 pp
96 pp
282 pp
ParkingUpdated car traffic infrastructure
154 155
parking phase 1
156 157
parking phase 2parking phase 2
158 159
parking phase 3
160 161
Profile 1 / Overall
162 163
Profile 1 / Detail 1 Profile 1 / Detail 2Livable plinth and first floor (start-ups, shared offices, ...)
Water gutter and a groundwater well with solar powered pump
164 165
Profile 1 / Detail 3 Multi-functional playfields Profile 1 / Detail 4 Raised beds (for elderly and disabled) to join the collective food production
166 167
Profile 1 / Detail 5 Central car traffic axis becomes a slow traffic space (cyclists, pedestrians)
Profile 1 / Detail 6 Outdoor market (where the locally grown vegetab-les and fruits are being sold) and a cafe
168 169
ground water well with solar powered pump
9m
4m
1m
ditches around the commercial and community gardens serving as a water source and boarder2m
0.8m
4msemi-permeable surface terrace / market area
6m10cm
Surface will be partly kept free to assure permeability of water.
Profile 1 / Elements
170 171
Profile 2 / Overall
172 173
Profile 2 / Detail 1 Profile 2 / Detail 2 Outdoor market and cafe (where the locally grown vegetables and fruits are being sold) and playing / bbq area
Livable plinth and first floor (start-ups, shared offices, ...)
174 175
Life along the plinth
shared private space - main entrance to section, staircase
existing centre - supermartet, fitness centre, offices of small entreprices
new functions
GROUND FLOOR: mostly public functions open till late in the evening, bigger spaces available- shared bicycle storage and bicycle kitchen- kindergarten (connected to the playground or sport field outdoor)- bar, cinema, ...
fragmented flat divided into 4 sections on the ground level to create a more human scale
GALLERY: - start up offices (cheap rent)- working ateliers for students- design and crafts- library (for the neighbourhood, not only the building)- cafe- specialized small shops (toys, knitting, books, flowers) - possible due to cheap rents
220m
52m 52m 49m 47m
176 177
SHArED BIcycLE StOrAGE AnD BIKE KItcHEn
StArt-UP OffIcES AnD AtELIErS LIBrAry
178 179
PetržalkaRESIDENTIAL BUILDING EAST/ GROUND FLOOR
PetržalkaRESIDENTIAL BUILDING EAST/GROUND FLOOR DETAIL
180 181
PetržalkaRESIDENTIAL BUILDING EAST /1ST FLOOR
PetržalkaRESIDENTIAL BUILDING EAST /1ST FLOOR
PetržalkaRESIDENTIAL BUILDING EAST /1ST FLOORDETAIL
182 183
water gutters for1. better infiltration of storm water2. as a natural water source3. as a natural boarder between public pedestrian paths and semi-public collective gardens
1.3m ground level
Visualisation Petržalka 2020+Urban food production in collective gardens
more planted trees and plants will keep the water closer to the grass and vegetables and will prevent it from drying
184 185
Local products are brought and sold in the local supermatket, establishing and strenghtening the local micro economy
Visualisation Petržalka 2020+Urban meadows
186 187
“Flower meadows in cities to improve understanding of urbanisation on insect pollinators.
All of the crops in the community gardens will need pollinating, so urban pollinators are important.”
188 189
Karol (dog) seems happier with all the sniffing and digging in our new meadow. And I bump into more friends. Last time on our walk I even applied for volunteering at the beekeeping station!
190 191
towards a re-sourceful and responsible city
A paradigm shift does not mean less care from the city administration's side, but a partnership based on mutual responsi-bility and shared maintenance. It seems that every year the local municipality is cutting costs in maintenance of public spaces, resulting in transformation of green open surfaces into lower mainte-nance paved squares1 or demolished public elements or facilities such as fountains, pavement materials, benches. With the current economic situation and lack of finances, we tend to forget that we have at hand unused, even renew-able resources: climatological (such as storm water, wind or sun energy) and social (sharing tools and skills). Setting ground and establishing public-private partnership could offer a new strategy for the city as a step towards a more resil-ient and resourceful city. The city would save costs by collecting storm water (less load on the drainage system and stored water to be used for watering the parks in the hot summer months) in the main-tenance and create attractive cooling urban spaces, when existing resources - human capital and natural renew-able resources - are smartly utilized. The public-private partnership between the city and citizens or local initiatives would
conclusion create a platform where both parties would decide and be responsible in cre-ating, protecting and maintaining urban open spaces (for instance proposing new permeable spaces or planting new and protecting existing trees or repairing ex-isting public fountains and installing new drinking water taps in urban 'hot-spots').
In both cases, Old Town and Petržalka, the notion of rediscovering and creating a relationship with the city is strong. The Old Town has the potential to become more resourceful with its climatologi-cal processes such as storm water and to create a cooler and more attractive urban environment to its citizens. It can also become more cost-effective by put-ting less load on the drainage system and mobilizing and letting people main-tain and re-establish a relationship with their parks. Petržalka is a home to one third of Bratislava’s population, offering an anonymous city-scape to anonymous city-dwellers. Through re-creating, redis-covering and reconnecting with the so-cial and natural components of the city, the living conditions of us city-dwellers will improve. All ideas of citizens, not interfering with the permeable character and ecological processes of the area, are
welcome and allowed. A tree nursery be-coming an urban forest, food growing or a sport area for children and adults.
In the beginning of this paper, both of case study locations were presented with their strengths and weaknesses. With simple and smart environmental and social injec-tions, both can benefit enormously and move towards a more resilient city. This, however, is not in the hands of „someone“ or a centrally responsible institution, but in the hands of all of us who want to live in a healthy and attractive urban environment.
192 193
references:
Benepe, Adrian; Parks as Green Infrastructure, Green Infrastructure as Parks: how Need, Design and Technology Are Coming Together to Make Better Cities, April 17, 2013 <http://www.thenatureofcities.com/2013/04/17/parks-as-green-in-frastructure-green-infrastructure-as-parks-how-need-design-and-technolo-gy-are-coming-together-to-make-bet-ter-cities> (last accessed on july 24, 2013)
de Carlo, Giancarlo; Architecture's public: the revolt and the frustration of the school of ar-chitecture (1969), ARCh+ 211/212 Think Global Build Social, summer 2013, p. 86 – 96
de Roo, Michelle; Roozen, Niek; The Green City GuidelinesTechniques for a healthy liveable city, September 2011 <www.degroen-estad.nl/Media/download/7074/Green+City+Guidelines.pdf> (last ac-cessed on july 24, 2013)
karssenberg, hans ed., The City at Eye Level, Eburon, 2012 <http://www.thecity-ateyelevel.com> (last accessed on july 24, 2013)
194
Urban permeability:On plants and plinths
A graduation urban design project by
Veronika Kovácsová
Amsterdam Academy of ArchitectureJanuary 2014