varying nf in qcd: scale separation, topology (and …osborn/lbsm16/slides/lombardo.pdfj. phys....
TRANSCRIPT
I. Zero temperature:
String tension, Critical temperature, Wilson flow
II. High temperature: Topological susceptibility
MpL, K. Miura, T. J. Nunes da Silva and E. Pallante,
Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, no. 25, 1445007 (2014),
+ work in progress
A. Trunin, F. Burger, E. M. Ilgenfritz, MpL and M. Muller-Preussker,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 668, no. 1, 012123 (2016),
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 668, no. 1, 012092 (2016),
+ work in progress
From UV to IR
11
ΛIR
ΛUV
Nfc
x = Nf/Nc
In the conformal phase IR scales vanish
but UV ones survive
Standard picture of scale
separation
The coupling walks for
14
Arean, Iatrakis, Jarvinen, Kiritsis 2013
(Essential) singularity in the
chiral limit and mass ratios: example from holographic
V-QCD
Not Unique
Power-law corrections to essential singularity
Gies et al. 2013 Alho, Evans, Tuominen 2013
Miranski scalingPower-law X
Quasi-Goldstone nature of the scalar
not unique:
Mass deformed theory: EoS approach for IR quantities
y = f(x)
y = m/ <
¯
>
�� =
6�⌘2�⌘
Second order transition:
x = (Nfc �Nf )/ <
¯
>
1�
<
¯
>= (Nfc �Nf )
�
Essential singularity:
x = e
p(Nf
c�Nf )/ <
¯
> <
¯
>= e
p(Nf
c�Nf )
Continuity of f(x) plus asymptotic forms for m ! 0 and Nf ! Nfcimply
<
¯
>/ e
p(Nf
c�Nf )for m smallish and (Nf
c �Nf ) largish
<
¯
>/ m
1/�for m largish and (Nf
c �Nf ) smallish
Nogawa, Hasegawa, Nemoto, 2012
Anomalous dimension appears naturally below Nfc Scaling limited by Goldstone singularities in the chiral limit (Wallace Zia)
Alho, Evans, Tuominen 2013
Mass deformed theory
Analogous to KMI, LSD
These features are seen in model calculations:
With mass
With mass
Mutatis mutandis, Eos approach reproduces KMI scenario:
Mass deformed theory II: KMI discussion
Scaling with anomalous dimension
KMI 2013
IR IR IR…..
Conformal scaling
IR
Griffith’s analyticity
Analogiesin the broken phase
Essential sing.
Differencesin the symmetric phase
2nd order transition
(X power-law)
Approaching conformality from below and above
EoS
Observables:
Critical temperature W0, W1, … induced by Wilson flow String tension Technical lattice scale defined at one lattice spacing
Strategy: consider dimensionless ratios R = O1/O2 When O2 is UV this is the facto a conventional scale setting Observation: R relatively stable wrt mass variations
PreliminaryPreliminary
⇤LAT
Nf=6
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2
t d/d
t t2 E
w0Tc
Beta = 5.025, WilsonBeta = 5.025, Symanzik
Beta = 5.2, WilsonBeta = 5.2, Symanzik
Preliminary
Scale from Wilson flow
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.18
0.19
0.2
0.21
0.2 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.3
(Tcw
0(N
f=6)
- Tc
w0(
Nf=
8))/T
cw0(
Nf=
6)
Reference value
Moving the scale with Wilson flow
TcWr(Nf=6)�TcWr(Nf=8)TcWr(Nf=6)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16
t d
/dt
t2 E
w0Tc
Nf = 6Nf = 8
UV
Qualitatively as expected, limited by lattice artifacts
Tc and the string tension
Preliminary
Tcp�/ (1� ✏Nf/Nc)
Again similar to the prediction of the WSS model:
communicated by F. Bigazzi
Mild decrease, possibly constant as Nf ! N c
f
: 3H(T) = ma(T) Axion freezout
Berkowitz Buchoff Rinaldi 2015
Axion density at freezout controls axion density today
Freezout
Yang Mills
Axions ‘must’ be there: solution to the strong CP problem
Ammitted but
Postulate axions, coupled to Q:
In the region of interest T > 500 MeV
1) We need 2+1+1 2) 2+1+1 = 4 (approximatively)
We can place the region of interest in the Nf, T diagram
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
Beta = 2.1
’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout2’ using 1:3’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout3’ using 1:3’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout4’ using 1:3’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout5’ using 1:3’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout1’ using 1:3’gWF-b2.10nt20.tout6’ using 1:3
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Beta = 2.1
Cold Hot
Shape of distributions of topological charge: different flow time
Q Q
= (0.1,0.15,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.45,0.66)
Bonati, D’Elia, Mariti, Martinelli,Mesiti,Negro,Sanfilippo, Villadoro arXiv:1512.0674
TMFT
Decrease with T much slower than DIGA
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008
Chi
**0.
25
a2
200 < T < 210 400 < T < 430150 < T < 153160 < T < 165240 < T < 250340 < T < 350
, 0.6Continuum limit for different scales
�(T )1/4
T
A preliminary continuum extrapolation shows an even milder decrease wrt to Nf = 2+1
..to be continued
strong sensitivity to Nf
Summary
We have studied the evolution of different dimensionless observables with Nf, for a fixed quark mass.
An external mass enables communication between different phases, which are no longer qualitatively different.
The dynamics retain features of the precritical behavior, in accordance with an EoS analysis:we have observed scale separation which indirectly supports walking of the coupling.
The theory with eight flavors is qualitatively different from QCD.
Topological susceptibility at high T, which is relevant for axion physics, seems to be particularly sensitive to the number of fermions.