utilitarianism intro or revision pp
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Utilitarianism
Definition:
• Focus is on consequences. • Hedonism: Only pleasure is intrinsically
good, and only pain intrinsically bad.• The proper aim of morality is therefore to
promote happiness and diminish misery.• Classical hedonic utilitarianism (Mill): We
ought to do whatever maximizes the balance of pleasure over pain for everyone.
Rationale:
• Rejects exceptionless rules – it’s not always wrong to lie, steal, break your promises, or disobey your parents.
• Human happiness and misery give a solid basis for evaluating the norms of different cultures.
• Can be reconciled with Christianity etc as considers others;
• (Singer) arguably any non-egoistic moral theory must consider outcomes for others, so utilitarianism is basic.
Flavours:
• Act – JJC Smart. Approach sums up likely benefits and harms for each act. Easy to rationalize, difficult to apply, potentially erratic (Mill: ‘Godless expediency’).
• Rule – Richard Brandt. Rule-based approach follows rules (of thumb?) established in advance (e.g. stealing usually doesn’t have the best consequences) Quicker, less erratic, might not be responsive to circumstances.
• Preference/pluralist - Peter Singer - evaluate consequences in terms of various goods, not just hedonism: virtue, knowledge, pleasure, life, and freedom, or animal desires.
Issues:
• Could have bizarre implications: would slavery/racism, killing miserable rich and giving the money to charity be right if they maximized the total pleasure?
• Right results, wrong reasons (= Kant’s attack). • Isn’t it wrong in itself to kill an innocent person,
even if it had the best consequences?• Bernard Williams: George and the Chemical
Warfare job; Jim and the Indian Massacre…• Nozick and the Experience Machine: do we
choose a life of pleasure?
Questions, Questions…
• These are on the critical material in the handout…
• Groups to discuss, then report back…
Bernard Williams: Issues with Mill
• What is the ‘George’ example?
• What is the ‘Jim’ example?
• What is ‘integrity’ and why does Mill think utilitarianism is incompatible with it?
• What does Williams say about possible and/or remote effects?
J.J.C. Smart – Act-Utilitarianism
• Act vs. Rule – what’s the difference?
• What objections to Rule-Utilitarianism are there?
• What are hedonistic, ideal utilitarianism? Name some adherents…
• Why are higher pleasures more ‘fecund’?
J.J.C. Smart – Rule-Utilitarianism
• What does Smart say about ‘average’ and ‘total’ happiness?
• What use does Smart think an act-utilitarian can make of rules?
• What is Smart’s response to Wiliams’ thought-experiments?
Richard Brandt – Rule-Utilitarianism
• How does Brandt define act-utilitarianism?
• What does he see as its weaknesses?
• What is his defence of rule-utilitarianism?
Peter Singer: Preference Utilitarianism
• What is the difference between hedonic and preference utilitarianism?
• What is Nozick’s ‘Experience Machine’ idea, and how is it relevant to a defense of preference utilitarianism?
• Why might an animal-rights activist prefer preference utilitarianism?
Homework:
• Is utilitarianism compatible with having integrity in one’s moral opinions and behaviour?
• (50 marks)