usoo6220743b1 (12) united states patent (10) patent … · u.s. patent apr. 24, 2001 sheet 2 of 103...
TRANSCRIPT
USOO6220743B1
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,220,743 B1 Campestre et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 24, 2001
(54) PROCESSES AND MATERIALSSELECTION 3,626,377 * 12/1971 Markely et al. .................. 340/172.5 KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM 3,628,004 12/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/193
4,807,108 2/1989 Ben-Arich et al. .................. 364/148 (75) Inventors: Jean R. Campestre, Vacaville, CA 4,827,423 * 5/1989 Beasley et al. ...................... 364/468
(US); Alex N. Kalos, Lake Jackson, TX 5,241,465 8/1993 Oba et al. ............................ 364/101 (US); Robert E. Cramer; John F. 5.249,120 * 9/1993 Foley ................................... 364/401
5,260,882 11/1993 Blanco et al. ....................... 364/499 Braley, both of Midland, MI (US); 5,424,954 6/1995 Makishima ........................... 364/473 Nathan M. Lacoff, Sugar Land, TX 5.463.564 * 10 2 - - -2 /1995 Agrafiotios et al. ................. 364/496 (US); Ranganath K.Shastri, Midland, 5,542,024 7/1996 Balint et al. ......................... 395/161 MI (US); James H. Barron, Brazoria, 5,586,039 * 12/1996 Hirsh et al... ... 364/468.01 TX (US) 5,600,779 * 2/1997 Palmer et al. ....................... 395/340
5,701,400 12/1997 Amado ................................... 395/76 (73) Assignee: The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI
(US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS
*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 66 (*) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ESR-Alarge Knowledge-Based Project od European U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days Generation Industry”, Expert System With Applications,
a -- vol. 5, pp. 465,477 (1993), Jovanovic et al., Sep. 1993.* 21) Appl. No.: 08/826,651 (21) Appl. No 1826, * cited by examiner (22) Filed: Apr. 4, 1997
Related U.S. Application Data Primary Examiner Paul P. Gordon (60) Provisional application No. 60/014.941, filed on Apr. 5, ASSistant Examiner Ramesh Patel
1996. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm J. M. Mark Gilbreth (51) Int. Cl. .............................. G06F 19/00; G06G 7/66 (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. Cl. ................................ 364/468.03; 364/468.04;
364/468.02; 364/468.05; 707/3; 707/10 A computer implemented knowledge-based System for the (58) Field of Search ......................... 364/468.07, 468.02, selection of materials and/or fabrication processes for a
364/468.03, 468.04, 468.05, 513; 707/3, durable goods application. The System consists of a graphi 10, 106, 500, 501; 395/50, 76, 650, 54, cal user interface, an expert System shell and a models and
68, 52 data base program. The System provides rapid, consistent and accurate techno-economic comparisons of processes
(56) References Cited and materials to Select the best materials and fabrication processes for the durable goods application.
U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
3,560,725 2/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/184 19 Claims, 103 Drawing Sheets
10 15
EXPERT SYSTEM SHELL
DLL
11 13 '-18 GUI HyPEETEXT (e.
DOE
DEE
DLL K
, 16
SPREAD SHEET
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 1 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
EXPERT SYSTEM SHELL
- 18 a a s DEE
DLL
f N SPREAD SHEET
10
13
GUI HYPERTEXT
15
DLL
11
6
F.G. 1
41 71 PROCESSES SHAPES MATERIAL r FEATURES
40 70 SELECTION SHAPE SELECTION
ust 11 - 4 - aws 100 50 N 60 Michauci, Economic
ANALYSES ANALYSES
Y 61 51 . cost DIMENSIONS
FIG. 2
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 2 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
CONSULIATION --> PAMS PAGE-4
CUSTOMER L APPLICATION APPLICATION PAGE
BACKGROUND APPLICATIONS
CUSTOMER IEEAD, BSSEP BUSINESS NEEDS NEXPORT OBJECT OA.CKB
CE:...OPEgly D (OA) PARAMETER DOW PAGE AND
BUSINESS BACKGROUND POTENTIAL BOOK
ALTERNATE
--> RECOMMENDATIONS
PAGE AND EXCEL BACKGROUND APPLYS1.5K
PROCESSES PRESELECTION PROCSYS1.5K BOARD MALSYS1.5K FUNCTIONAL
REQUIREMENTS -Ho
PAGE AND NEXPORT MATERALS BACKGROUND OBJECT
BOOKAIETERNAL MODELCKB
CANDIDATE AND br m on an REJECTED PROCESS
AND MATERIALS
PAGE AND BACKGROUND EXCEL DESIGN BOARD ENGSYS 1.5K PAGE AND / MECHSYS1.0DW SHAPE
MECHANICAL SELECTION g BACKGROUND CONSTRAINTS ) | MECHANICAL (GI) ANALYSES B00KAZEERNALN ''El
PAGE AND MODEL OKB BACKGROUND
DIMENSION(S) FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSESBOARD
PAGE AND EXCEL BACKGROUND ESS
PROCESSING - ECONOMIC BOOKAETERNAL MECHSYS10Dy COSTS. ANAEYSES pactAND NEXPORT
BACKGROUND OBJECT
!... COSPER ESER NMODEISOKB FIG 3
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 3 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
INPUTIOUTPUT PAGES
SCRIPTAND COMMUNICATION
EXPERTSYSTEM SHELL
USER INPUT OR PAMS OUTPUT
INPUT OR OUTPUTSECTIONS OF THE BOOK
SCRIPTOR COMMUNICATION BACKGROUNDS OR PAGES
OTHER WINDOWSAPPLICATION
I/O INFORMATION FLOW
INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN I/O SECTIONS ANDSCRIPTAND COMMUNICATION SECTIONS
INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN TOOLBOOKAND ANOTHER WINDOWSAPPLICATION
INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN CONSULTATION PHASES OR KNOWLEDGE MODULES
FIG. 4
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 9 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
. . iSERE HYDROLYTIC STABILITY N:
is a HEAT DEFLECTION. ; TEMPERATUREN
:* COLD TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESs.
AMBIENT RADATIONSTERILIZABILITY TOUGHNESS Ni
CREEP 1. :N WEATHERABILITY 'RESISTANCE DELECTRIC N
FATIGUE a. :N *COLOR RESISTANCE
.3/ TRANSPARENCY N. WEARIABRASION ( SADDITIONS ...; N SURFACE RESISTANCE N. a FINIS
--"SHAPE '', IMPACTRESISTANCE COMPLEXITY
'34 .* constant STFESS PRODUCTION VOLUME ongsun
sy.' t “DRAFT IGNITION UNDERCUIS. RESISTANCE in .
A. SIZE INSIDE CONTROL : 3. TOLERANCES ENVIRONMENTAL : 'é
A. SHAPE CONTROL LEGAL ACCURACY
RECYCLABILITY : DATA
EMISSIONS
MATERIALS WITH ALL PROCESSES REJECTED e AMAICEF SUGGEST SELECTION AND PROCESSES WITH ALL MATER ALSELMINATED SPECIFIER
25. SPECIFIER FOR PROCESSES / PROC 1 (----- Y proceets: SPECIFIER FORMATERIALS PROC3 *-i-A 1'ss
' ? Y '...SSS pRoc, MA 1 “...SS w y , 's ''', N
MAT2 MAT3 '', s 8 MATN
FIG. 10
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 12 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
St. EST LEGAL isgc/BUY a- - - - - - SUGGESTRECYCLABILITY MATCHPROCESSES RECYCLABILITY ->EXPLAN CHARACTERISTICS WITH REOUREMENTS AND
INFORM USER
SIEST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT S. -- - - - - - SUGGESTLEGAL
MATCH MATERALS FDAAPPROVAL ->EXPLAN WITH REQUIREMENTS AND
INFORMUSER
SigEST IGNITION RESISTANCE ExoMENA INPACT ----. SUGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTIONAL WALUES-DEXPLAN WITH RECUREMENTS AND
INFORM USER
SIEST STIFFNESS yo RESISTANCE ----- SUGGESTIGNITION RESISTANCE MATCH MAVERALS FUNCIONAL VALUES->EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFRE/ECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIEST IMPACTRESISTANCE SIFIESS ----- SUGGEST STIFFNESS MATCH MAVERALS FUNCIONAL WALUES->EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND AND ADD MATCHEDMAVERALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED CHECKIFAWAILABLE HIGH SHAPE OR COMPLEXITY PROCESSES CAN ENHANCE ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE PARTSTIFFNESS
SIEST PRODUCTION WOLUME ACT RESISTANCE ----- SUGGEST IMPACTRESISTANCE MATCH MATERAS FUNCTIONAL WALUES-DEXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOU/REMENTS AND AND ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED CHECKIFAWAILABLE HIGH SHAPE OR COMPLEXITY PROCESSES CAN ENHANCE ADDMAICHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CAMDIDATE PARTIMPACTRESISTANCE
FIG. 14
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 13 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
SEST LEGAL agpuCIO WOLUME ----SUGGEST PRODUCTION WOLUME MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SEST SIZE MERCUIS ----SUGGESTUNDERCUIS MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
AP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIEST SHAPE CONTROLACCURACY S5 ----SUGGEST SIZE MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERSICS --> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENIS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREECTED
ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SEST INSIDE TOLERANCES CONTROL SEPE CONTROLACCURACY ----SUGGEST SHAPE CONTROL AOCRACY -
MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
AP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SEST DRAF (SpE TOLERANCE CONTROL ----SUGGESTINSIDE TOLERANCES CONTRI -
MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
AP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
St. EST CONSTRAINS DIMENSIONALITY Aft ---SUGGEST DRAFT MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -D EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENIS AND
AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
FIG. 15
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 14 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
St. EST SHAPE COMPLEXITY SysIRIT DIMENSIONALITY---SUGGEST CONSTRAINT MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIESTADIONS SEFE COMPLEXITY ----SUGGEST SHAPE COMPLEXITY MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIEST WEARIABRASION RESISTANCE AEIONS 1---SUGGESTADDITIONS MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIEST FAIGUERESISTANCE ERABRSON RESISTANCE---SUGGEST WEAR, ABRASION MATCH MATERIAL FUNCTIONAL WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHEDMATERALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
St. EST CREEPRESISTANCE RIVE RESISTANCE ----SUGGEST FAIGUERESISTANCE MATCH MATERIAL FUNCIONAL WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OFREECED ADDMAICHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SIESTAMENT TOUGHNESS BET ---SUGGEST CREEPRESISTANCE MATCH MATERAS FUNCIONAL WALUES-> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOU/REMENTS AND
Ap MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHEDMAIERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
FIG. 16
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 15 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
SUGGESTDELECTRIC AMBIENT TOUGHNESS -----------SUGGESTAMBIENT TOUGHNESS - AND AND
MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGESTRANSPARENCY DELECTRIC ----SUGGEST DIELECTRIC AND AND MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND
AP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGESTTEXTURE TRANSPARENCY AND AND MATCH MATERALS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
----SUGGESTRANSPARENCY
SUGGESTSURFACEFINISH TEXTURE ---.SUGGESTIEXTURE AND AND MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGEST COLOR SURFACEFINISH ----SUGGESTSURFACEFINISH AND AND MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGESTWEATHERABILITY COLOR ---- SUGGEST COLOR AND AND MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
FIG. 17
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 16 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
SUGGESTRADATIONSTERILIZABILITY WEATHERABILITY ----SUGGEST AND AND WEATHERABILITY MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SS EST COLDIEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS BATON STERILIZABILITY ----SUGGESTRADATION MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION VALUES --> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND
ABP MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED
ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGEST HEAT DEFLECTIONTEMPERATURE COLD TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS --- SUGGEST COLD AND AND TEMPERATURE MATCH MATERALS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAIN TOUGHNESS WITH APPLICATION REOUREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SUGGESTHYDROLYTICSIABILITY HEAT DEFLECTIONTEMPERATURE --SUGGESTHEAT AND AND DEFLECTION MATCH MATERAS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAN TEMPERATURE WITH APPLICATION REOUREMENTS AND
AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
SEST CHEMICAL RESISTANCE HOTC STABILITY --SUGGESTHYDROLYTIC SIABILITY -
MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND
Ap MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED
ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
MATCH MATER ALS FUNCTIONAL WITH CHEMICAL RESISTANCE ---.SUGGEST CHEMICAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS INTERMS OF AND RESISTANCE CHEMICAL EXPOSURE AND TYPES OF --> EXPLAIN EXPOSURE AND
ABP MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE
FIG. 18
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 17 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
is ERCES TRANSFEREXPANATIONFORMARKET
in Sog SGESPECIMPORIANCE - DOERIDERSION AND iSEEAOYO AEI E'." IMPORTANCETOGO EPAWOWERA \so WDERSANDING isosol. COWHEN EGE OFCSIOMER SIGGESTOPPORTUNITYWFORATION CSIOMERRESIS AMD AND TRANSFEREPAIATION OFOVERALI TRANSFEREPAAION OFCSIOWER UNDERSANDING CISIOMER TOGO l COMMIMENTOGO AND --> OPPORTUNITY AND SIGGES MAJORCSOMERGOAS S. WDERSANDING
AND TRANSFEREXPANATION OFDOWBUSINESSIOGUI
s TECHNICA CAPABILITYFEASIBILITY TRANSFEREXPANATIONFORTECHNICAL an FEASIBILITY TO GI
SOEPE PROJECT TRANSFERESPAWATION OF DEVELOPMENT Act IOC
Soviet POTENTIA - > 24 DOWBSINESS EPANOVERALIUNDERSANDING E. yo OFDOWREVENUE DOWBUSINESSRESS
AMD SR ANDSTRATEGES
TRANSFEREPANATION FORASSESAND E. IOGUI so COMPEINEADAMAGE
TRANSFEREPANATIONFORDONCOMPEIVE ADAMAGEOG
FIG. 19
U.S. Patent
SIGEST PRESSURE SUGGEST DIRECT COMPETITION
SIGEST BARGANINGLEVERAGE SUGGEST PRICE SENSI/VITY
EWALUATE TOP3 CUSIOMERAND FAUAE COST TOSWITCH RESIN EWALUATEABILITY TO BACKWARD INTEGRATE AND AAIF ALTERNATIVESUPPLIERS EWALUATEDIFFERENTIATION POSITION
5% AIE PROFITABILITY EWALUATE RESIN COST AND EWALUATE RESIN SOLDAT DISCOUNT AND EWALUATE REAL PRICE GROWTH
5% AIE CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 18 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
AEATRACTENS -> EAN MARKETATTRACTIVE
CONCLUDEABOUTMARKETATTRACTIVENESS BASED ON PRESSURE AND DIRECT COMPETITION
PRESSURE - - - - - - SUGGEST AND PRESSURE
-> EAN PRESSURE CONCLUDEABOUT PRESSURE BASED ON BARGANINGLEWERAGE AND PRICE SENSITWITY
1------ SUGGEST MARKET ATRACTIVENESS
BARGANINGLEWERAGE as s - - - SUGGEST AND BARGANING
-> EAN BARGANINGLEVERAGE LEVERAGE CONCLUDEABOUTBARGANINGLEWERAGE
SE SENSI/VITY -> EAN PRICESENSI/VITY
CONCLUDE PRICESENSI/VITY
------ SUGGEST PRICE
DIRECT COMPETITION -- - - - - - SUGGEST DIRECT AND COMPETITION
SUGGEST PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION -> EXPLAINDIRECT COMPETITION AND SUGGEST COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION AND EWALUATE MARKET GROWTH
A UAE SELLING/MKGT COST 5% AIE PRICE WARIATION EWALUATEABILITY TO BRAND
EWALUATE TOP2 SHARE OF MARKET AND SUGGEST TOP5 SHARE OF MARKET
AND CONCLUDEDIRECT COMPETITION BASED ON CAPACITYUTILIZATION PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION, COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION AND MARKET GROWTH
agpuCT STANDARDIZATION ------- SUGGEST PRODUCT STANDARIZATION
-> EAN PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION CONCLUDE PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION
FIG. 20
COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION ------ SUGGEST -> AND COMPETIOR
EXPLAIN COMPETITOR
AcENRTON CONCLUDE COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION
FIG 21
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 21 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
SUGGEST PROBABILITY TECHNICAL CAPABILITY....... SUGGESTECHNICAL TECHNICAL SUCCESS FEASIBILITY CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY AND -> AND SUGGESTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY EXPLAINTECHNICAL SUCCESS DOWAND CUSIOMER AND
CONCLUDETECHNICAL CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY
EVALUATEAPPLICATION TYPE - PROBABILITYTECHNICAL SUGGEST PROBABILITY AND SUCCESS -- - - - - - - - TECHNICAL SUCCESS EWALUATE MAVERALS IN AND EXISTING PRODUCT EXPLAIN PROBABILITY AND TECHNICAL SUCCESS EWALUATE MAERAL IN MEWSOLUTION SUGGESTMATERAL TECHNICAL TECHNICAL FEASIBILITYDOW SUGGESTTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY is Uy -> AN CUSIOMER ----- DOWAND CUSIOMER SUGGEST PROCESSAND EXPLAINTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY By AND CUSIOMER
CONCLUDETECHNICAL FEASIBILITY DOWAND CUSIOMER
EWALUATE MATERAL NEW MAVERALTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SUGGESTMATERIAL TECHNICAL SOLUTION - > AND <-- FEASIBILITY AND EXPLAIN MATERIAL TECHNICAL SUGGESTMAVERAL CAPABILITY is BUY
CONCLUDEMATERAL TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
54 AE DOW AFA. CAPABILITY EWALUATE CUSIOMER PEXPLAIN MATERIAL
CAPABILITY AND CONCLUDEMATERAL CAPABILITY
EVALUATEAPPLICATION TYPE - D PROCESSANDDESIGN ... SUGGEST PROCESSAND DESIGN AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SUGGEST PROCESS AND AND DESIGN CAPABILITY EXPLAIN PROCESSAND
DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY AND CONCLUDE PROCESSAMD DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY
EWALUATEDOW PROCESS AND DESIGN AND CAPABILITY EWALUATECUSIOMER - D AND
EAN MATERAL CAPABILITY CONCLUDEMAVERAL CAPABILITY
FIG. 24
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 22 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
EVALUATEACTIVITIES - > DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ... SUGGESIDEVELOPMENI PROJECT AND AND EWALUATE PERSON-TIME EXPLAIN DEVELOPMENT FORECAST PROJECT AND AND 5%uAIE RESOURCES CONCLUDE PROJECT EVALUATE TIME FRAME
FIG. 25
5%uAIE Ib OF RESIN/YEAR E9 REVENUE POTENTIAL SUGGESTDOW REVENUE - POTENTIAL - EWALUATE EXPANSION -> EXPLAINDOW REVENUE POTENTIAL POTENTIAL AND AND EWALUATE MAXIMIZE REVENUE CONCLUDE DOW REVENUE
POTENTIAL
FIG. 26
EWALUATE COMPETITIVE ASSETS AND STRATEGIES, SUGGESIASSETS AND ADWANTAGE AND STRATEGIES AND - > EXPLAINASSETS AND EVALUATE PROJECT FIT STRATEGIES WITH STRATEGIES AND
CONCLUDE ASSETS AND STRATEGIES
FIG. 27
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 23 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
SUGGESTDOW COST --> DOW COMPETITIVE SUGGESTDOW POSITION WS. COMPETITION ADVANIAGE ... COMPETITIVE AND AND ADWANTAGE SUGGESTDOW DIFFERENTIATION EXPLAINDOW COMPETITIVE WS. COMPETITION APNA GE
CONCLUDE DOW COMPETITIVE
SUGGEST MANUFACTURING DOW COST POSITION SUGGESTDOW COST COSTS WS. COMPETITION ... POSIONWS AND -> AND COMPETITION SUGGEST PRODUCTION EXPLAIN DOW COST ABILITY ESTION WS. COMPETITION EVALUATE COST OF CAPITAL CONCLUDE DOW COST REOUIREMENTS POSITION WS. COMPETITION
EVALUATE CONVERSIONS MANUFACTURING COSTS SUGGEST COSTS AND ----- MANUFACTURING AND EXPLAIN MANUFACTURING COSIS EWALUATE RAWMATERIALS SR5IS
CONCLUDEMANAUFACTURING
EWALUATE DOWPLANT CAPACITY PRODUCTION CAPABILITY SUGGEST UTILIZATION AND ----- PRODUCTION AND D EXPLAIN PRODUCTION CAPABILITY AUAE PLANTAGE ABILITY EVALUATE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CONCLUDE PRODUCTION CAPABILITY
SUGGEST DIFFERENTATION DOW DIFFERENTATION SUGGESTDOW WS. COMPETITIONSUM > spOMPETION --- DIFFERENTATION VS.
COMPETITION EXPLAINDOW DIFFERENTATION
S5OMPETITION CONCLUDE DOW DIFFERENTATION WS. COMPETITION
EVALUATEACCOUNT C DIFFERENTATION WS. COMPETITION SUGGEST
EFIRATION St. ... DiffSTATION WS. COMPETITION EWALUATE DESIGNASSISTANCE EXPLAINDIFFERENTIATION VS. SUM AND COMPETITIONSUM EWALUATE GLOBAL SUPPLY AND AND CONCLUDE DIFFERENTATION EWALUATE HISTORIC INDUSTRY WS. COMPETITIONSUM
RESENCE AuAIE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 5%uAIE UNIQUEDELIVERYOPTION EVALUATE UNIQUE PRODUCT PREFORMANCE
FIG. 28
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 24 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
MARKETATTRACTIVENESS -- - - - - - - -
PROJECT IMPORTANCE -- - - - - - - -
s CUSTOMER COMMITMENT --------- CUSTOMER MAJOR GOALS "
UNDERSTANDING THE CUSTOMER
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY ---------
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT --------
DOW BUSINESS REVENUE ---------
N ASSETS AND STRATEGIES ---------
COMPEIVE ADVANIAGE ---------
- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES
-- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE
FIG. 29
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 26 of 103
HI/M085) WO|| 70/Tdd7N
/50N7THÕEIWIT TÕETÕEE| ------>
Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 30 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
1- - - - - - - - DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - ACT WITIES PERSON TIME FORECAST RESOURCES TIME FRAME
1- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES
re- - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE
FIG. 35
tes s a was s REVENUE 1H-e- ESAIED Lb OF RESINPER
EXPANSION POTENTIAL POTENTIAL FOR MAXIMIZING REVENUE
- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES
-- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE
FIG. 36
-- - - - - - - - ASSETS & STRATEGIES DOWADVANTAGE FIT WITH CORPORATE
-- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES
1- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHER FIGURE
FIG. 37
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 31 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
<!— (NOLIWWWIdXE ISHQ 01 JONEHEHNI NOI1000G/) HEHNI
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 32 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
STRUCTURAL REACTION INJECTION MOLDING MATERIAL MODEL
PLEASE ENTER THE FILLER FORSRIM POLYURETHANE 60%GF GRADE OF MATERIAL FILLER 1 %. FILLER 1 PLIES FILLER 1 GLASS MAT0.75 OZ
FILLER2 %. FILLER2 PLIES FILLER2 KEWLAR08 OZ WOWN
FILLER3 %. FILLER3 PLIES FILLER3 NO FILLER
PROFILE EXTRUSION PROCESS SPECIFIC INFORMATION
LENGTH OF THE PART IN.
FILLER2 NUMBER OF HOLLOW
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 33 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP <<APPLICATIONDOMANSOPPORTUNITY DENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE
TECHNICAL
EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S) CONSTRAINTS & RECUREMENTS IMPORTANCE IMPORTANC
WAITING FOR USER INPUT.
FIG. 42
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 34 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
PAMSSYS1, 2093 v. C. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULTATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP
<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITYIDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL
EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S) CONSTRAINTS & REOUREMENTS IMPORTANCE IMPORTANC
<< 1 >>
RELIABILITY
WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.
FIG. 43
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 35 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
a PAMSSYS1, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM W W HELP
<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY DENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL
EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S)
MATERIAL USED DOWMATERIAL
CURRENT
8
WEARNET auxu
NETSHAPE NEWTO-THE-WORLD
WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.
FIG. 44
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 36 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
- PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENIS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP
<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL
CAPABILITY
CUSTOMER
s i DOW WEAK
WAITING FOR USER INPUT.
FIG. 45
- PAMSSYS1, 2093 v FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULTATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP
<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE BUSINESS
CUSTOMER MAJOR GOALS
PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS
WAITING FOR USER INPUT.
FIG. 46
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 37 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM W W HELP
<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE BUSINESS
<<PREVIOUS DOW CUSTOMER INTEREST & BUSINESS
ABILITY TO BRAND AVERAGE
WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.
FIG. 47
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 38 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
?TER MTM WEIS?S HGOW NIWTdX? SNOIIVITOSNÕÕ SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÒZ ‘ISAS SWyd
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 42 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
?TER MTM WEIS?S EGO W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÒZ ‘ISAS SWyd
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 49 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
?TIL, DJ ???ÇÇ TEMET
?TER MTM WHISKS HGOW NIWTdX? NOIIVIT/\SNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTIJ 86ÖZ ‘ISAS SWyd
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 50 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
?TER MTM WEIS?S EGO W NIWTdX? SNOLIVITOSNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÖZ ‘ISAS SW7d=
| << ET NIIN00 ||
| ? | a |
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 54 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
HVJÁ/SIINI) ; 00000||
(GENIIN00) BdVHS
d?EF ATM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|I/II/ISNO? SINJWW00 10087 JT? 86DE ‘ISAS SWºd =
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 56 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
1437X0/70 103THS OI
W0/10/1008'd
?TER MTM WHIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 l/1087 JTË
| } |a| - 860, SASSW, E
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 59 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
N0/10/1008'd
?TER MTM WEIS?S ?GOW NIWTdX? SNO|I/III/SNO? SINJWWOO I/1087 JTË 8603 ‘ISAS SWyd =
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 61 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
| HWM-TOM
dTER MTM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 l/1087 JTË 86?Z ‘ISAS SWyde=
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 62 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
0|100008'de S?f?OBEGNI)
dTER MTM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNOIIVITOSNO? SINJWW00 10087 TI? 86Ö? ‘ISAS SWyd =
N00) HdVHS
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 67 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
1) OPENINGS NEED TO BE COWERED YE
2) INSIDE OBJECTS NEED TO BE ATACHED LOCATED SEPARATED NONE OF THE ABOVE
3) OUTSIDE OBJECTS NEED TO BEATTACHED TO THE PART HANDLE OR MANIPULATE THE PART NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE PART NEED TO BESEPARATED BY THE PART NONE OF THE ABOVE
INSIDESURFACE MUST BESMOOTH OUISIDESURFACE MUST BESMOOTH PROVIDESA GAP WITHA SUPPORTING SURFACE REOUIRES DIVIDINGSECTIONS
FIG. 77
GUI DYNAMICS 1 3 OBJECTS=NONE DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE" QUESTIONS 2, 3, 5,
DiSABLE ADDITIONS GUESiiONSi2 GUI DYNAMICS2 BASICSHAPE OF THE PART DOES NOT HAVE SYMMETRY OFREVOLUTION
DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE" OUESTIONS 10C
GUI DYNAMICS 3 OVERALL SHAPE IS FOLDED DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE"QUESTIONS 10B, PLATE 10C
GUI DYNAMICS 4 HASA CLOSED-SHAPE DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE"QUESTIONS 10E CROSS-SECTION
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 68 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
1) OVERALL SHAPE CLASS
2) ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED
3) POSSIBLE SHAPEDECOMPOSITION
FIG. 79
LEGEND
MULTI-LINE TEXT
SINGLE OR MULTIPLE FIRST BOX
HELP BOX
FIG. 80
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 69 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
1) EXISTENCE OF OBJECTS TOTALTY ENCLOSED (ORSEPARATE COMPONENTS) PARTIALLY ENCLOSED
GOINIOUT THE PART NONE
2) ACCESS OF OBJECTS INSIDE YES Hi PART NECESSARY DURING NO
3) ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF LARGEST OPENING COMPARED TO THE ORDER OF E5EGEEEEEEEE|39AFM OF THE OF THE PARTIS (INA DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE OPENING)
4) RELATION WITH A SOLIDSUPPORTING NO CONTACT SURFACE PART SHAPE PROVIDES ORIENTATION
PART SHAPE DOES NOT PROVIDE ORIENTATION ORIENTATION IS REQUIRED ORIENTATION IS NOT REQUIRED
5) RELATION WITH OTHER OBJECT PART SHAPE PROVIDES ORIENTATION PART SHAPE DOES NOT PROVIDE ORIENTATION
6) AESTHETICS NOT IMPORTANT A FACTOR VERY IMPORTANT
7) LOAD MAGNITUDE LARGE MEDIUM SMALL
FIG. 81
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 70 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
APPLICATIONS VA CHOOSE LEVEL 35APPLICATION DOMAIN (DOUBLE CLICK TO EXPTO LEVEL 45)
AGRICULTURAL AIRCRAFT APPLIANCES s :33:8:
BUILDIN COMPUTER & BUSINESSEQUIPMENT CONSUMERELECTRONICS FURNITURE HEALTHCARE HOSE TUBBING & PIPE HOUSEWARES INDUSTRIAL/MISC LAWN & GARDEN MARINE PERSONAL CARE RECREATION & LESURE TELECOMMUNICATION & DATA STORSGE TOYS
FIG. 82
PARTSPECIFICATIONS: SURFACE VA
SURFACE FINISH CLASSA NOT NECESSARY X 2.
COLOR PAINT EX 2
TEXTURE FINE X
TRANSPARENCY < > X 2.
FIG. 83
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 71 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
P PARTSPECIFICATIONS: SURFACE VA 4.
EXTERIORADDITIONS EXTERIOR PROJECTIONS EXTERIORRIBS
INTERIOR PROJECTIONS INTERIORRIBS
P PARTSPECIFICATIONS: MISCELLANEOUS VA
FEATURES
NONE
SHAPE CLASSES 3-D OPENED X 2.
DRAFT (DEGREE)> = <= D > X 2
INSIDE TOLERANCE IMPORIANT X 2. CONTROL
DELECTRIC 3-D OPENED X 2. PROPERTIES
PRODUCTION 100000 X VOLUME
FIG. 85
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 72 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
= PARTSPECIFICATIONS MECHANICAL VA
AMBENT MEDIUM TOUGHNESS
CREEPRESISTANCE Low I X 2.
FATIGUE MEDIUM IX 2 RESISTANCE
PART TOUGHNESS MEDIUM X 2.
PART STIFFNESS HIGH X 2.
WEAR-ABRASION LOW X 2 RESISTANCE
FIG. 86
p PARTSPECIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & LEGAL VA
EMISSIONS WARNING X 2.
ENVIRONMENTAL INO WARNING X 2. IMPACT
LEGAL WARNING TX
RECYCLABILITY WERNING
FIG. 87
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 73 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
p PARTSPECIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENT VA
CHEMICAL EXPOSURE
CHEMICAL-TYPES AMINES AROMATIC BASES CONCENTRATED BASES DILUTED
HYDROLYTIC STABILITY
190
HDT (t) { D > X 2.
COLD TEMPERATURE MEDIUM X TOUGHNESS
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 78 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
MESSAGE IV ATIENTION >>>>....THERE IS NO COMPATIBLE PROCESSES LEFT FORABS
ABS WILL NOT BE INCLUDED INFURTHER AWALYSES {SYS4 ANDECONOMICS) UNLESS SOME OF THE COMPATIBLE PROCESSES ARE RE-SELECTED, THE COMPATIBLE PROCESSESARE:
(EXTRUSION-BLOW-MOLDING-PROFILE-EXTRUSION ROTATIONAL-MOLDING THERMOPLASTIC-INJECTION-MOLDING DRAPE-FORMING MATCHED-MOLD-FORMING TWIN-SHEET-FORMING THERMOFORMING COMPRESSION-MOLDING)
FIG.91
MESSAGE IV THERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS FLUORINATED GRAPHITE FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES.
NHERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS GLASS FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES. fHERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS CROSSLINKABLE GRAPHITE FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES.
FIG. 92
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 81 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
ECONOMICS VA
PRODUCTION VOLUME (PARIS/YR) 100000 2
PART PROJECTED AREA (N12) 1 ?
PARTSURFACE AREA (N12) 2
PART THICKNESS (IN) 0.1 2 O
PART VOLUME(IN 3) f 2
PRODUCT LIFE (YEARS)
FIG. 95
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 82 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
PROCESSES AND MATERIAL FAMILES VA
PROCESSES FAMILIES
GASSED-ASSISTED-INJECTED-MOLDING REACTION-INNECTION-MOLDING
nPPO STRUCTFOAM E.
8
s
PC BLOWMOLD sg,
FIG. 96
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 83 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
PROCESSES AND MATERIAL FAMILES VA
PROCESSES FAMILIES
GASSED-ASSISTED-INJECTED-MOLDING LCP INUMOLD REACTION- TION-MOLDI is: mPPO EXTRUSION
mPPO INUMOLD mPPO STRUCTFOAM NYLON AMORPHOUS PC ABS PC ABS 10%GF PC ABS 20%GF PC ABS IR PC BLOWMOLD PC INIMOLD PC IR PC OPTICAL PC PBT PC PBT PC PBT 10%GF PC PBT 30%GF PC PET PC PET 10%GF PC PET 20%GF PC SHEET PC STRUCTFOAM POLYUREA PP COPOLYMERS 20%GF PP COPOLYMERS 30%GF PP COPOLYMERS 40%GF
&
fiftSifficitotitive
FIG. 97
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 84 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
p PROCESSES AND MATERAL FAMILIES VA s
PROCESSES FAMILIES
GASSED-ASSISTED-INECTED-MOLDING REACIONNECIONMOLDING SS
top existow M
rispyists
FIG. 98
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 85 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
STRUCTURAL REACTION INFECTIONMOLDING PROCESS SPECIFIC INFORMATION
LENGTH OF THE PART IN.
WDTH OF THE PART IN.
STRUCTURAL REACTION INJECTION MOLDING MATERIAL MODEL
PLEASE ENTERFILLER INFORMATION FORSRIRA POLYURETHANE 38% GF GRADE OF MATERIAL
FILLER 1 %FILLER 1 PLIES FILLER 1 GLASS MAT 1 OZ 0
FILLER2 %FILLER2 PLIES FILLER2 GLASS MATCSM M8605 0
FILLER3 %FILLER3 PLIES FILLER3 NO FILLER 0 0
OK OK
FIG 100
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 86 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
ANALYSES RESULIS v A
PROCESSES FAMILIES DEMINSIONCN) WEIGHT(b) COSTPART(8) SIRUCTURE REACTIONNECTIONMOLDING SIRM-POZYUREIHAME-30%GF O. O.09 83.64 SIRUCTURE REACTIONNECTIONMOLDING SIRM-POZYUREIHAME-60%GF 0 003 $140 THEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-8%GF 0 1 003 8038 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-20%GF O. O.09 8040 THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-30%GF O. O. SO43 THEROPASIC-MECTIONMOLDING ABS-40%GF O. O. SO44 IHEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-HIHEAT 0 003 $432 IHEROPASTICIMIECTIONMOLDING ABS-IN MOD 0 003 $4.38 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-IP 0 009 $434 THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-PLAYING 0 003 NIDO THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS-701-GF40 Of 0.11 S856 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS-701-GR60 Of O2 S862 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS 202-LGFAO O. O. 11 88.65 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS 202-LGF60 Of Of2 S862 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ICP-MARGOD O. O. NIDO THEROPIASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING IIPPOMARIGOD O. O.09 $429 IHEROPIASIC-INVECTIONMOLDING MOM-AMORPHOUS O. O.08 NIDO IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS O. O.08 S830 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS-10%GF O. O.09 S834 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS-20%GF 0 009 $837 IHEROPASIC-MECTIONMOLDING PCABS-6 O. O.08 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCIRPHOIDE O. O.03 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PC-06 O. O.09 S835 IHEROPIASIC-MECONMOLDING PC-SPECIAL O. O.09 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PC-BPS O. O.03 NIDO IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPB.0%GF O. O.03 MIDO HEROPIASIC-MECTIONMOLDING PCPB-20%GF O. O.3 NIDO THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPEI O. O.09 NIDO THEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPE.10%GF 0 009 MIDO IHEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING PCPEP20%GF O. Of NIDO THEROPASIC-INVECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-20%GF Of 007 SO.19 IHEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-80%GF Of THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-40%GF 0.
FIG. 101
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 87 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
a MICROSOFTEXCEL-Ecosys95.XLW VA PFILE EDT FORMULA FORMAI DATA OPTIONS MACRO
WINDOW HELP
de BIA A
WORKBOOK CONTENTS
EEE INJECTIONMOLDING-------------------------------------------------------------. EE DECASTING -------------------------------------------------------------. EEE PROFILE EXTRUSION-------------------------------------------------------------- EEE EXTRUSION BLOWMOLDING ---------------------------------------------------- EEE EXTRUSIONTHERMOFORMING...................................................
EEE TABLE XLS------------------------------------------------------------------------ de SPECIFICXLM--------------------------------------------------------- de MACR01------------------------------------------------------------------------- EEE ENGINEERING--------------------------------------------------------------------- p EEE FILLERDAIA ----------------------------------------------------------------------
ADD REMOVE
FIG. 102
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 88 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
p MICROSOFTEXCELECOSYS95.XIWS VA FILE SELECTION DESIGN ECONOMICS HELP
SELECT ONE FAMILY SELECT ONE OR SEVERAL FAMILIES
ABS-18%GF ABS-18%GF ABS-38%GF ABS-28%GF ABS-45%GF ABS-33%GF ABS-34%GF ABS-46%GF ABS-HIHED ABS-HIHED ABS-TNUMOLD ABS-INUMOLD ABS-IR ABS-IR ABS-PIPE ABS-PIPE ABS-PLATING ABS-PLATING ABS-SHEET ABS-SHEET ABS-STRUCTFOAM ABS-STRUCTFOAM ABS-TPU ABS-IPU ACID-COPOLYMER ACRLICS-COPOLYMER ACID-HOMOPOLYMERS ACRLICS-HOMOPOLYMER ACRYLICS ALUMINUM-355/356 ALUMINUM-355/356 ALUMINUM-368 ALUMINUM-368 ALUMINUM-388/384 ALUMINUM-388/384 ALLUMINUM-SHEET ALUMINUM-SHEET ASA ASA ARDEL ARDEL BM-38%GRAPH BM-38%GRAPH BM-56%GRAPH BM-655GRAPH EPOXY RESINS-38%GF EPOXY-RESINS-38%GF EPOXYRESINS-35%GRAPH EPOXY RESINS-35%GRAPH
FIG. 103
US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 89 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent
(N)SNOISNEWIQ ? SHITIWWA
I?HSTWINIWTTW 803 (N) SSHNXOIHI JHI HEINE JSVETd
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 90 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
E MODELS AND FAMILES IVA
MODELS FAMILIES
CIRCULAR PLATE-FXED ABS-HIHEAT CIRCULAR PLATE-SIMPLYSUPPORTED ABS-MMOLD EQUAL-LEGGED-ANGLE EQUILATERAL-TRIANGLE-PLATE HOLLOW-CIRCULAR HOLLOW-RECTANGULAR HOLLOW-SQUARE-ROIATED-45 |PROFILE LPROFILE
SOLID-RECTANGULAR SOLID-SOUARE SOLID-SOUARE-ROIATED-45 ALUMINUM-SHEET SYMMETRIC-HAT ASA TEE AZDEL IHIN-AMWULAR BM-30%GRAPH U-PROFILE-CHANNEL BM-65%GRAPH
EPOXYRESINS-30%GF EPOXYRESINS-35%GRAPH EPOXYRESINS-65%GRAPH EYRESINS-70%GF
FIG. 105
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 91 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
p RECTANGULAR PLATEEDGESIMPLY SUPPORTED VA s
CONSTRAINTS
LOAD (Ibf): 10
DEFLECTION (M) 00031207
LENGTH (IN) 10
DIMENSIONS (IN) 0.86794.1963
MODEL VALIDITY TES
FIG. 106
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 94 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
MICROSOFTEXCEL-ECOSYS95.xls IVA FFLE EDT FORMULA FORMAT DAIA OPTIONS MACRO WINDOW HELP
NORMAL SBIAA RECIPLAEFXB 4
A B C D E F G H II A PMSSYS944094-MECHANICALANAYSES (STANDARDSHAPES)
(QCOPYRIGHT THEDOWCHEMICAL COMPANY
6 COLORISED FORDEAP DOWCWFIDEVA
8 COLORFORDEMPIOIPI 9 COLORISEFORDECIPI
HYPOTHESES MODESASEACOMSAVIATICKESS BEINGMODE AVERALENGINEERINGPROPERIES
YOVGMODIS 4SE-04 (PS) f 15 PARGENERCDIMESOS
SPAN E.ON OVERALSIFFESCCATIONS
MOMENT OFWERIS 366-07 N° 4 20ERAILSIFFNESS 167E-4 (NAS)
CONSTRAWSANDBEAMEONATION LOAD IOE-03
2MAXIMUMDEFECTION 3MAXWBONDINGNOMEW fif 4AXIMSTRESS 3.84E+10 BFFY2 5 DISTANCEFROM THE CENIROIDIOTHE EXIREMEFIBER IISE-00 IV
MODEADIY BEAMAXIMUMSOPE OOSSHOULDBE (927 RADAS
2RATRAREAD SOIOSSAPPLICABLE OSION FORTHEECONOMICODES
AVERAGENATHICKESS O767SR22 2SRACEARE SIA: 3 PROJECTEDAREA s 2 40AE All-SE
REGINGAPAIEDGESIPISA SOLDREGIANGIEHOLOWRECIAGE ECHWE CHOOSEHESANDARDSHAPE AODE- E. CRGIARPAIESPYSPO CHOOSETHEAXIS SOVER NXPTEST
OFDMDASION SOVERTEST I HASCOWERGED TOCURRENTSOLUTION XPCHOICE
2 CAMOT IMPROVE THE GIRRENSOLICY 3HASTEMAXIMIMEORKERATIONLI 4 REACHEDAPOWWHERETHEVALUESDO NOTCHANGE SCIDMOTFWDAFEASBESOLION 7 FOUND THAT THELINEARY CONDITIONSWOTSAISHED 8ECOWEREDAWERRORIAE 9 DOES NOTAEEOIGHEORYAAIBE OSISEDEYANOTHERSESON OFMCROSOFTECE. |:
D
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 95 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1
114
ENTERPART 112 Si:SES 116 118 CHOOSE p EMEY ENTERREQUIRED ENTERKNOWN
APPLICATION -MEgypal PARTFEATURES SHAPE CLESS - SURFACE
- MISCELLANEOUS 113 117
SHAPE DEFAULT SELECTION REQUIREMENTS RESULTS
110
PROCESS AND
MATERAL SELECTION RESULTS
120
STRUCTURAL. 125 130 AWALYSIS FOREACH
MATERIAL OPTION - PLATES
REQUIRED PART ECONOMIC THICKNESS FOR MODELS FOR EACH MATERIAL EACH PROCESS
- SHELLS OPTION OPTION - BEAMS
- EOUWALENT THICKNESS
135 PART COST FOREACH MATERIAL/ PROCESS OPTION
FIG 110
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 96 of 103
FIG. 111A
FIG. 111B
FIG. 111D
FIG. 111E
FIG. 111F | FIG. 111G
FIG. 111C
FIG. 111
US 6,220,743 B1
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 97 of 103
START 200
LOAD KNOWLEDGE 202
BASES
205 LOADDAIA BASES
207 INTIALIZE
DEFAULT VALUES
209 STARTUSER INTERFACE
THIS ALSO GET 211 FEEDS THE
APPLICATION "PROCESS FILTER" REQUIREMENTS
THIS ALSO PRESENTA 213 FEEDS THE VARITY OF
PREDEFINED APPLICATIONS
TO USER
His: USERSELECTSA PARTICULAR 25"PROCESS FILTER APPLICATION
(e. gigs NG THIS FEEDS
CAMCORDER") THE "DESIRED MATERAL PROFILE"
SYSTEM LOADS 218 DEFAULTS VALUES
FOR GIVEN APPLICATIONS
USERREFINES/ 220 MODIFIES WALUES ACCORDINGLY
F.G. 111A
247
230 "MECHANICAL MODELS"
227
st
US 6,220,743 B1
243 THIS FEEDS THE "DESIRED MATERAL PROFILE"
242
THIS FEEDS THE MECHANICAL MODELS
241
USER REFINES/ MODIFIES WALUES ACCORDINGLY
240
SYSTEM LOADS DEFAULTWALUES
FOR GIVEN SHAPE
238
USERSELECTSA PARTICULAR
SHAPE
236 PRESENTA COLLECTION
OF PREDEFINED . SHAPES TO
USER
233
GET SHAPE SPECIFICATION
31
SHAPE SELECTION
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 98 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1
(A) 249 251 253
DERVE DERIVE USE
E. ERR, APPLICATION
USE SHAPE SPECIFICATION
258 265 263
260 PATTERN-MATCH
USESSA | | A.S.E PRE-SELECT SPECIFIED BY FUNCTIONAL CC) MATERIALS THE DESIRED WALUES STORED
MATERAL IN THE MATERALS DATA BASE
280 275 278 PATTERN-MATCH THE
IDENTIFYTHOSE PER-SELECTED MATERIALS PRE-SELECTION PROCESSES THAT AGAINST THE MATERIALS FABRICATION CAN FABRICATE A999ESES-CD PROCESSES EACH OF THE CAPABLE OFFABRICATING
PRE-SELECTED LOOK UPDATA STORED MATERALS IN THE PROCESSES
DATA BASE
FIG. 111B
U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001
255
"TRANSLATE" OR MAPAPPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SHAPE INFORMATION
TO PREDEFINED FUNCTION WALUES
SELECT THOSE MATERALS IN
DATA BASE WHOSE FUNCTIONAL WALUES CLOSELYMATCH THE DESIRED MATERIAL
PROFILE
288
EACH PRE-SELECTED MATERAL MAYBE
ACCOMMODATED BY MORE THAN ONE
FABRICATION PROCESSES
Sheet 99 of 103
287
SOME PRE-SELECTED MATERIAL MAY NOT BE ACCOMMODATED BY MORE THAN ONE
FABRICATION PROCESSES
293 THERE MAYBE KNOWN
FABRICATION PROCESSES THAT ARE NOT"CALLED FOR" BYANY OF THE
PRE-SELECTED MATERALS
FIG. 111C
268 GENERATE
RATIONALE FOR PRE-SELECTING
CERTAIN MATERALS
GENERATE RATIONALE FOR REJECTING CERTAIN
MATERALS
283
GENERATEFURTHER RATIONAL FOR PRE-SELECTING
CERTAIN PROCESSES
292
GENERATEFURTHER RATIONALE FOR
REJECTING CERTAIN PRE-SELECTED MATERALS
298
GENERATE RATIONALE FOR
REJECTING CERTAIN PROCESSES
US 6,220,743 B1