usoo6220743b1 (12) united states patent (10) patent … · u.s. patent apr. 24, 2001 sheet 2 of 103...

148
USOO6220743B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,220,743 B1 Campestre et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 24, 2001 (54) PROCESSES AND MATERIALSSELECTION 3,626,377 * 12/1971 Markely et al. .................. 340/172.5 KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM 3,628,004 12/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/193 4,807,108 2/1989 Ben-Arich et al. .................. 364/148 (75) Inventors: Jean R. Campestre, Vacaville, CA 4,827,423 * 5/1989 Beasley et al. ...................... 364/468 (US); Alex N. Kalos, Lake Jackson, TX 5,241,465 8/1993 Oba et al. ............................ 364/101 (US); Robert E. Cramer; John F. 5.249,120 * 9/1993 Foley ................................... 364/401 5,260,882 11/1993 Blanco et al. ....................... 364/499 Braley, both of Midland, MI (US); 5,424,954 6/1995 Makishima ........................... 364/473 Nathan M. Lacoff, Sugar Land, TX 5.463.564 * 10 2 - - -2 /1995 Agrafiotios et al. ................. 364/496 (US); Ranganath K.Shastri, Midland, 5,542,024 7/1996 Balint et al. ......................... 395/161 MI (US); James H. Barron, Brazoria, 5,586,039 * 12/1996 Hirsh et al... ... 364/468.01 TX (US) 5,600,779 * 2/1997 Palmer et al. ....................... 395/340 5,701,400 12/1997 Amado ................................... 395/76 (73) Assignee: The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS *) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 66 (*) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ESR-Alarge Knowledge-Based Project od European U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days Generation Industry”, Expert System With Applications, a -- vol. 5, pp. 465,477 (1993), Jovanovic et al., Sep. 1993.* 21) Appl. No.: 08/826,651 (21) Appl. No 1826, * cited by examiner (22) Filed: Apr. 4, 1997 Related U.S. Application Data Primary Examiner Paul P. Gordon (60) Provisional application No. 60/014.941, filed on Apr. 5, ASSistant Examiner Ramesh Patel 1996. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm J. M. Mark Gilbreth (51) Int. Cl. .............................. G06F 19/00; G06G 7/66 (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. Cl. ................................ 364/468.03; 364/468.04; 364/468.02; 364/468.05; 707/3; 707/10 A computer implemented knowledge-based System for the (58) Field of Search ......................... 364/468.07, 468.02, selection of materials and/or fabrication processes for a 364/468.03, 468.04, 468.05, 513; 707/3, durable goods application. The System consists of a graphi 10, 106, 500, 501; 395/50, 76, 650, 54, cal user interface, an expert System shell and a models and 68, 52 data base program. The System provides rapid, consistent and accurate techno-economic comparisons of processes (56) References Cited and materials to Select the best materials and fabrication processes for the durable goods application. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 3,560,725 2/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/184 19 Claims, 103 Drawing Sheets 10 15 EXPERT SYSTEM SHELL DLL 11 13 '-18 GUI HyPEETEXT (e. DOE DEE DLL K , 16 SPREAD SHEET

Upload: duonglien

Post on 28-Aug-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

USOO6220743B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,220,743 B1 Campestre et al. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 24, 2001

(54) PROCESSES AND MATERIALSSELECTION 3,626,377 * 12/1971 Markely et al. .................. 340/172.5 KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM 3,628,004 12/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/193

4,807,108 2/1989 Ben-Arich et al. .................. 364/148 (75) Inventors: Jean R. Campestre, Vacaville, CA 4,827,423 * 5/1989 Beasley et al. ...................... 364/468

(US); Alex N. Kalos, Lake Jackson, TX 5,241,465 8/1993 Oba et al. ............................ 364/101 (US); Robert E. Cramer; John F. 5.249,120 * 9/1993 Foley ................................... 364/401

5,260,882 11/1993 Blanco et al. ....................... 364/499 Braley, both of Midland, MI (US); 5,424,954 6/1995 Makishima ........................... 364/473 Nathan M. Lacoff, Sugar Land, TX 5.463.564 * 10 2 - - -2 /1995 Agrafiotios et al. ................. 364/496 (US); Ranganath K.Shastri, Midland, 5,542,024 7/1996 Balint et al. ......................... 395/161 MI (US); James H. Barron, Brazoria, 5,586,039 * 12/1996 Hirsh et al... ... 364/468.01 TX (US) 5,600,779 * 2/1997 Palmer et al. ....................... 395/340

5,701,400 12/1997 Amado ................................... 395/76 (73) Assignee: The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI

(US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS

*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 66 (*) patent is extended or adjusted under 35 ESR-Alarge Knowledge-Based Project od European U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days Generation Industry”, Expert System With Applications,

a -- vol. 5, pp. 465,477 (1993), Jovanovic et al., Sep. 1993.* 21) Appl. No.: 08/826,651 (21) Appl. No 1826, * cited by examiner (22) Filed: Apr. 4, 1997

Related U.S. Application Data Primary Examiner Paul P. Gordon (60) Provisional application No. 60/014.941, filed on Apr. 5, ASSistant Examiner Ramesh Patel

1996. (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm J. M. Mark Gilbreth (51) Int. Cl. .............................. G06F 19/00; G06G 7/66 (57) ABSTRACT (52) U.S. Cl. ................................ 364/468.03; 364/468.04;

364/468.02; 364/468.05; 707/3; 707/10 A computer implemented knowledge-based System for the (58) Field of Search ......................... 364/468.07, 468.02, selection of materials and/or fabrication processes for a

364/468.03, 468.04, 468.05, 513; 707/3, durable goods application. The System consists of a graphi 10, 106, 500, 501; 395/50, 76, 650, 54, cal user interface, an expert System shell and a models and

68, 52 data base program. The System provides rapid, consistent and accurate techno-economic comparisons of processes

(56) References Cited and materials to Select the best materials and fabrication processes for the durable goods application.

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

3,560,725 2/1971 Claxton et al. ...................... 235/184 19 Claims, 103 Drawing Sheets

10 15

EXPERT SYSTEM SHELL

DLL

11 13 '-18 GUI HyPEETEXT (e.

DOE

DEE

DLL K

, 16

SPREAD SHEET

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 1 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

EXPERT SYSTEM SHELL

- 18 a a s DEE

DLL

f N SPREAD SHEET

10

13

GUI HYPERTEXT

15

DLL

11

6

F.G. 1

41 71 PROCESSES SHAPES MATERIAL r FEATURES

40 70 SELECTION SHAPE SELECTION

ust 11 - 4 - aws 100 50 N 60 Michauci, Economic

ANALYSES ANALYSES

Y 61 51 . cost DIMENSIONS

FIG. 2

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 2 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

CONSULIATION --> PAMS PAGE-4

CUSTOMER L APPLICATION APPLICATION PAGE

BACKGROUND APPLICATIONS

CUSTOMER IEEAD, BSSEP BUSINESS NEEDS NEXPORT OBJECT OA.CKB

CE:...OPEgly D (OA) PARAMETER DOW PAGE AND

BUSINESS BACKGROUND POTENTIAL BOOK

ALTERNATE

--> RECOMMENDATIONS

PAGE AND EXCEL BACKGROUND APPLYS1.5K

PROCESSES PRESELECTION PROCSYS1.5K BOARD MALSYS1.5K FUNCTIONAL

REQUIREMENTS -Ho

PAGE AND NEXPORT MATERALS BACKGROUND OBJECT

BOOKAIETERNAL MODELCKB

CANDIDATE AND br m on an REJECTED PROCESS

AND MATERIALS

PAGE AND BACKGROUND EXCEL DESIGN BOARD ENGSYS 1.5K PAGE AND / MECHSYS1.0DW SHAPE

MECHANICAL SELECTION g BACKGROUND CONSTRAINTS ) | MECHANICAL (GI) ANALYSES B00KAZEERNALN ''El

PAGE AND MODEL OKB BACKGROUND

DIMENSION(S) FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSESBOARD

PAGE AND EXCEL BACKGROUND ESS

PROCESSING - ECONOMIC BOOKAETERNAL MECHSYS10Dy COSTS. ANAEYSES pactAND NEXPORT

BACKGROUND OBJECT

!... COSPER ESER NMODEISOKB FIG 3

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 3 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

INPUTIOUTPUT PAGES

SCRIPTAND COMMUNICATION

EXPERTSYSTEM SHELL

USER INPUT OR PAMS OUTPUT

INPUT OR OUTPUTSECTIONS OF THE BOOK

SCRIPTOR COMMUNICATION BACKGROUNDS OR PAGES

OTHER WINDOWSAPPLICATION

I/O INFORMATION FLOW

INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN I/O SECTIONS ANDSCRIPTAND COMMUNICATION SECTIONS

INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN TOOLBOOKAND ANOTHER WINDOWSAPPLICATION

INFORMATION FLOWBETWEEN CONSULTATION PHASES OR KNOWLEDGE MODULES

FIG. 4

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 4 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

SESS500Bd W0 || SITTIS?H 70

````

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 5 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 7 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 9 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

. . iSERE HYDROLYTIC STABILITY N:

is a HEAT DEFLECTION. ; TEMPERATUREN

:* COLD TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESs.

AMBIENT RADATIONSTERILIZABILITY TOUGHNESS Ni

CREEP 1. :N WEATHERABILITY 'RESISTANCE DELECTRIC N

FATIGUE a. :N *COLOR RESISTANCE

.3/ TRANSPARENCY N. WEARIABRASION ( SADDITIONS ...; N SURFACE RESISTANCE N. a FINIS

--"SHAPE '', IMPACTRESISTANCE COMPLEXITY

'34 .* constant STFESS PRODUCTION VOLUME ongsun

sy.' t “DRAFT IGNITION UNDERCUIS. RESISTANCE in .

A. SIZE INSIDE CONTROL : 3. TOLERANCES ENVIRONMENTAL : 'é

A. SHAPE CONTROL LEGAL ACCURACY

RECYCLABILITY : DATA

EMISSIONS

MATERIALS WITH ALL PROCESSES REJECTED e AMAICEF SUGGEST SELECTION AND PROCESSES WITH ALL MATER ALSELMINATED SPECIFIER

25. SPECIFIER FOR PROCESSES / PROC 1 (----- Y proceets: SPECIFIER FORMATERIALS PROC3 *-i-A 1'ss

' ? Y '...SSS pRoc, MA 1 “...SS w y , 's ''', N

MAT2 MAT3 '', s 8 MATN

FIG. 10

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 11 Of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

WIWQ JMRIHEHIST000S J

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 12 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

St. EST LEGAL isgc/BUY a- - - - - - SUGGESTRECYCLABILITY MATCHPROCESSES RECYCLABILITY ->EXPLAN CHARACTERISTICS WITH REOUREMENTS AND

INFORM USER

SIEST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT S. -- - - - - - SUGGESTLEGAL

MATCH MATERALS FDAAPPROVAL ->EXPLAN WITH REQUIREMENTS AND

INFORMUSER

SigEST IGNITION RESISTANCE ExoMENA INPACT ----. SUGGEST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTIONAL WALUES-DEXPLAN WITH RECUREMENTS AND

INFORM USER

SIEST STIFFNESS yo RESISTANCE ----- SUGGESTIGNITION RESISTANCE MATCH MAVERALS FUNCIONAL VALUES->EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFRE/ECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIEST IMPACTRESISTANCE SIFIESS ----- SUGGEST STIFFNESS MATCH MAVERALS FUNCIONAL WALUES->EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND AND ADD MATCHEDMAVERALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED CHECKIFAWAILABLE HIGH SHAPE OR COMPLEXITY PROCESSES CAN ENHANCE ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE PARTSTIFFNESS

SIEST PRODUCTION WOLUME ACT RESISTANCE ----- SUGGEST IMPACTRESISTANCE MATCH MATERAS FUNCTIONAL WALUES-DEXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOU/REMENTS AND AND ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED CHECKIFAWAILABLE HIGH SHAPE OR COMPLEXITY PROCESSES CAN ENHANCE ADDMAICHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CAMDIDATE PARTIMPACTRESISTANCE

FIG. 14

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 13 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

SEST LEGAL agpuCIO WOLUME ----SUGGEST PRODUCTION WOLUME MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SEST SIZE MERCUIS ----SUGGESTUNDERCUIS MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

AP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIEST SHAPE CONTROLACCURACY S5 ----SUGGEST SIZE MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERSICS --> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENIS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREECTED

ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SEST INSIDE TOLERANCES CONTROL SEPE CONTROLACCURACY ----SUGGEST SHAPE CONTROL AOCRACY -

MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

AP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SEST DRAF (SpE TOLERANCE CONTROL ----SUGGESTINSIDE TOLERANCES CONTRI -

MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

AP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADDMAICHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

St. EST CONSTRAINS DIMENSIONALITY Aft ---SUGGEST DRAFT MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -D EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENIS AND

AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

FIG. 15

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 14 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

St. EST SHAPE COMPLEXITY SysIRIT DIMENSIONALITY---SUGGEST CONSTRAINT MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIESTADIONS SEFE COMPLEXITY ----SUGGEST SHAPE COMPLEXITY MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIEST WEARIABRASION RESISTANCE AEIONS 1---SUGGESTADDITIONS MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIEST FAIGUERESISTANCE ERABRSON RESISTANCE---SUGGEST WEAR, ABRASION MATCH MATERIAL FUNCTIONAL WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHEDMATERALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

St. EST CREEPRESISTANCE RIVE RESISTANCE ----SUGGEST FAIGUERESISTANCE MATCH MATERIAL FUNCIONAL WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OFREECED ADDMAICHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SIESTAMENT TOUGHNESS BET ---SUGGEST CREEPRESISTANCE MATCH MATERAS FUNCIONAL WALUES-> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOU/REMENTS AND

Ap MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHEDMAIERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

FIG. 16

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 15 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

SUGGESTDELECTRIC AMBIENT TOUGHNESS -----------SUGGESTAMBIENT TOUGHNESS - AND AND

MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGESTRANSPARENCY DELECTRIC ----SUGGEST DIELECTRIC AND AND MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND

AP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGESTTEXTURE TRANSPARENCY AND AND MATCH MATERALS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION RECUREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

----SUGGESTRANSPARENCY

SUGGESTSURFACEFINISH TEXTURE ---.SUGGESTIEXTURE AND AND MATCHPROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGEST COLOR SURFACEFINISH ----SUGGESTSURFACEFINISH AND AND MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSESTO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGESTWEATHERABILITY COLOR ---- SUGGEST COLOR AND AND MATCH PROCESSES CHARACTERISTICS -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED PROCESSES TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

FIG. 17

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 16 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

SUGGESTRADATIONSTERILIZABILITY WEATHERABILITY ----SUGGEST AND AND WEATHERABILITY MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SS EST COLDIEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS BATON STERILIZABILITY ----SUGGESTRADATION MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION VALUES --> EXPLAN WITH APPLICATION REOUIREMENTS AND

ABP MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED

ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGEST HEAT DEFLECTIONTEMPERATURE COLD TEMPERATURE TOUGHNESS --- SUGGEST COLD AND AND TEMPERATURE MATCH MATERALS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAIN TOUGHNESS WITH APPLICATION REOUREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SUGGESTHYDROLYTICSIABILITY HEAT DEFLECTIONTEMPERATURE --SUGGESTHEAT AND AND DEFLECTION MATCH MATERAS FUNCTION VALUES -> EXPLAN TEMPERATURE WITH APPLICATION REOUREMENTS AND

AEP MATCHEDMATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREIECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

SEST CHEMICAL RESISTANCE HOTC STABILITY --SUGGESTHYDROLYTIC SIABILITY -

MATCH MATERIALS FUNCTION WALUES -> EXPLAIN WITH APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND

Ap MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED

ADD MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

MATCH MATER ALS FUNCTIONAL WITH CHEMICAL RESISTANCE ---.SUGGEST CHEMICAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS INTERMS OF AND RESISTANCE CHEMICAL EXPOSURE AND TYPES OF --> EXPLAIN EXPOSURE AND

ABP MATCHED MATERIALS TO THE LIST OFREECTED ADD MATCHED MATERALS TO THE LIST OF CANDIDATE

FIG. 18

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 17 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

is ERCES TRANSFEREXPANATIONFORMARKET

in Sog SGESPECIMPORIANCE - DOERIDERSION AND iSEEAOYO AEI E'." IMPORTANCETOGO EPAWOWERA \so WDERSANDING isosol. COWHEN EGE OFCSIOMER SIGGESTOPPORTUNITYWFORATION CSIOMERRESIS AMD AND TRANSFEREPAIATION OFOVERALI TRANSFEREPAAION OFCSIOWER UNDERSANDING CISIOMER TOGO l COMMIMENTOGO AND --> OPPORTUNITY AND SIGGES MAJORCSOMERGOAS S. WDERSANDING

AND TRANSFEREXPANATION OFDOWBUSINESSIOGUI

s TECHNICA CAPABILITYFEASIBILITY TRANSFEREXPANATIONFORTECHNICAL an FEASIBILITY TO GI

SOEPE PROJECT TRANSFERESPAWATION OF DEVELOPMENT Act IOC

Soviet POTENTIA - > 24 DOWBSINESS EPANOVERALIUNDERSANDING E. yo OFDOWREVENUE DOWBUSINESSRESS

AMD SR ANDSTRATEGES

TRANSFEREPANATION FORASSESAND E. IOGUI so COMPEINEADAMAGE

TRANSFEREPANATIONFORDONCOMPEIVE ADAMAGEOG

FIG. 19

U.S. Patent

SIGEST PRESSURE SUGGEST DIRECT COMPETITION

SIGEST BARGANINGLEVERAGE SUGGEST PRICE SENSI/VITY

EWALUATE TOP3 CUSIOMERAND FAUAE COST TOSWITCH RESIN EWALUATEABILITY TO BACKWARD INTEGRATE AND AAIF ALTERNATIVESUPPLIERS EWALUATEDIFFERENTIATION POSITION

5% AIE PROFITABILITY EWALUATE RESIN COST AND EWALUATE RESIN SOLDAT DISCOUNT AND EWALUATE REAL PRICE GROWTH

5% AIE CAPACITY UTILIZATION

Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 18 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

AEATRACTENS -> EAN MARKETATTRACTIVE

CONCLUDEABOUTMARKETATTRACTIVENESS BASED ON PRESSURE AND DIRECT COMPETITION

PRESSURE - - - - - - SUGGEST AND PRESSURE

-> EAN PRESSURE CONCLUDEABOUT PRESSURE BASED ON BARGANINGLEWERAGE AND PRICE SENSITWITY

1------ SUGGEST MARKET ATRACTIVENESS

BARGANINGLEWERAGE as s - - - SUGGEST AND BARGANING

-> EAN BARGANINGLEVERAGE LEVERAGE CONCLUDEABOUTBARGANINGLEWERAGE

SE SENSI/VITY -> EAN PRICESENSI/VITY

CONCLUDE PRICESENSI/VITY

------ SUGGEST PRICE

DIRECT COMPETITION -- - - - - - SUGGEST DIRECT AND COMPETITION

SUGGEST PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION -> EXPLAINDIRECT COMPETITION AND SUGGEST COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION AND EWALUATE MARKET GROWTH

A UAE SELLING/MKGT COST 5% AIE PRICE WARIATION EWALUATEABILITY TO BRAND

EWALUATE TOP2 SHARE OF MARKET AND SUGGEST TOP5 SHARE OF MARKET

AND CONCLUDEDIRECT COMPETITION BASED ON CAPACITYUTILIZATION PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION, COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION AND MARKET GROWTH

agpuCT STANDARDIZATION ------- SUGGEST PRODUCT STANDARIZATION

-> EAN PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION CONCLUDE PRODUCTSTANDARDIZATION

FIG. 20

COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION ------ SUGGEST -> AND COMPETIOR

EXPLAIN COMPETITOR

AcENRTON CONCLUDE COMPETITOR CONCENTRATION

FIG 21

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 20 Of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 21 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

SUGGEST PROBABILITY TECHNICAL CAPABILITY....... SUGGESTECHNICAL TECHNICAL SUCCESS FEASIBILITY CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY AND -> AND SUGGESTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY EXPLAINTECHNICAL SUCCESS DOWAND CUSIOMER AND

CONCLUDETECHNICAL CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY

EVALUATEAPPLICATION TYPE - PROBABILITYTECHNICAL SUGGEST PROBABILITY AND SUCCESS -- - - - - - - - TECHNICAL SUCCESS EWALUATE MAVERALS IN AND EXISTING PRODUCT EXPLAIN PROBABILITY AND TECHNICAL SUCCESS EWALUATE MAERAL IN MEWSOLUTION SUGGESTMATERAL TECHNICAL TECHNICAL FEASIBILITYDOW SUGGESTTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY is Uy -> AN CUSIOMER ----- DOWAND CUSIOMER SUGGEST PROCESSAND EXPLAINTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY By AND CUSIOMER

CONCLUDETECHNICAL FEASIBILITY DOWAND CUSIOMER

EWALUATE MATERAL NEW MAVERALTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SUGGESTMATERIAL TECHNICAL SOLUTION - > AND <-- FEASIBILITY AND EXPLAIN MATERIAL TECHNICAL SUGGESTMAVERAL CAPABILITY is BUY

CONCLUDEMATERAL TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

54 AE DOW AFA. CAPABILITY EWALUATE CUSIOMER PEXPLAIN MATERIAL

CAPABILITY AND CONCLUDEMATERAL CAPABILITY

EVALUATEAPPLICATION TYPE - D PROCESSANDDESIGN ... SUGGEST PROCESSAND DESIGN AND TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SUGGEST PROCESS AND AND DESIGN CAPABILITY EXPLAIN PROCESSAND

DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY AND CONCLUDE PROCESSAMD DESIGNTECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

EWALUATEDOW PROCESS AND DESIGN AND CAPABILITY EWALUATECUSIOMER - D AND

EAN MATERAL CAPABILITY CONCLUDEMAVERAL CAPABILITY

FIG. 24

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 22 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

EVALUATEACTIVITIES - > DEVELOPMENT PROJECT ... SUGGESIDEVELOPMENI PROJECT AND AND EWALUATE PERSON-TIME EXPLAIN DEVELOPMENT FORECAST PROJECT AND AND 5%uAIE RESOURCES CONCLUDE PROJECT EVALUATE TIME FRAME

FIG. 25

5%uAIE Ib OF RESIN/YEAR E9 REVENUE POTENTIAL SUGGESTDOW REVENUE - POTENTIAL - EWALUATE EXPANSION -> EXPLAINDOW REVENUE POTENTIAL POTENTIAL AND AND EWALUATE MAXIMIZE REVENUE CONCLUDE DOW REVENUE

POTENTIAL

FIG. 26

EWALUATE COMPETITIVE ASSETS AND STRATEGIES, SUGGESIASSETS AND ADWANTAGE AND STRATEGIES AND - > EXPLAINASSETS AND EVALUATE PROJECT FIT STRATEGIES WITH STRATEGIES AND

CONCLUDE ASSETS AND STRATEGIES

FIG. 27

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 23 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

SUGGESTDOW COST --> DOW COMPETITIVE SUGGESTDOW POSITION WS. COMPETITION ADVANIAGE ... COMPETITIVE AND AND ADWANTAGE SUGGESTDOW DIFFERENTIATION EXPLAINDOW COMPETITIVE WS. COMPETITION APNA GE

CONCLUDE DOW COMPETITIVE

SUGGEST MANUFACTURING DOW COST POSITION SUGGESTDOW COST COSTS WS. COMPETITION ... POSIONWS AND -> AND COMPETITION SUGGEST PRODUCTION EXPLAIN DOW COST ABILITY ESTION WS. COMPETITION EVALUATE COST OF CAPITAL CONCLUDE DOW COST REOUIREMENTS POSITION WS. COMPETITION

EVALUATE CONVERSIONS MANUFACTURING COSTS SUGGEST COSTS AND ----- MANUFACTURING AND EXPLAIN MANUFACTURING COSIS EWALUATE RAWMATERIALS SR5IS

CONCLUDEMANAUFACTURING

EWALUATE DOWPLANT CAPACITY PRODUCTION CAPABILITY SUGGEST UTILIZATION AND ----- PRODUCTION AND D EXPLAIN PRODUCTION CAPABILITY AUAE PLANTAGE ABILITY EVALUATE PROCESS TECHNOLOGY CONCLUDE PRODUCTION CAPABILITY

SUGGEST DIFFERENTATION DOW DIFFERENTATION SUGGESTDOW WS. COMPETITIONSUM > spOMPETION --- DIFFERENTATION VS.

COMPETITION EXPLAINDOW DIFFERENTATION

S5OMPETITION CONCLUDE DOW DIFFERENTATION WS. COMPETITION

EVALUATEACCOUNT C DIFFERENTATION WS. COMPETITION SUGGEST

EFIRATION St. ... DiffSTATION WS. COMPETITION EWALUATE DESIGNASSISTANCE EXPLAINDIFFERENTIATION VS. SUM AND COMPETITIONSUM EWALUATE GLOBAL SUPPLY AND AND CONCLUDE DIFFERENTATION EWALUATE HISTORIC INDUSTRY WS. COMPETITIONSUM

RESENCE AuAIE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 5%uAIE UNIQUEDELIVERYOPTION EVALUATE UNIQUE PRODUCT PREFORMANCE

FIG. 28

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 24 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

MARKETATTRACTIVENESS -- - - - - - - -

PROJECT IMPORTANCE -- - - - - - - -

s CUSTOMER COMMITMENT --------- CUSTOMER MAJOR GOALS "

UNDERSTANDING THE CUSTOMER

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY FEASIBILITY ---------

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT --------

DOW BUSINESS REVENUE ---------

N ASSETS AND STRATEGIES ---------

COMPEIVE ADVANIAGE ---------

- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES

-- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE

FIG. 29

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 26 of 103

HI/M085) WO|| 70/Tdd7N

/50N7THÕEIWIT TÕETÕEE| ------>

Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 27 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

- - - - - - - -J>

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 28 Of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 30 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

1- - - - - - - - DEVELOPMENT PROJECT - ACT WITIES PERSON TIME FORECAST RESOURCES TIME FRAME

1- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES

re- - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE

FIG. 35

tes s a was s REVENUE 1H-e- ESAIED Lb OF RESINPER

EXPANSION POTENTIAL POTENTIAL FOR MAXIMIZING REVENUE

- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES

-- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHERFIGURE

FIG. 36

-- - - - - - - - ASSETS & STRATEGIES DOWADVANTAGE FIT WITH CORPORATE

-- CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES

1- - - - - - - - CONNECTION BETWEEN RULES FROMANOTHER FIGURE

FIG. 37

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 31 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

<!— (NOLIWWWIdXE ISHQ 01 JONEHEHNI NOI1000G/) HEHNI

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 32 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

STRUCTURAL REACTION INJECTION MOLDING MATERIAL MODEL

PLEASE ENTER THE FILLER FORSRIM POLYURETHANE 60%GF GRADE OF MATERIAL FILLER 1 %. FILLER 1 PLIES FILLER 1 GLASS MAT0.75 OZ

FILLER2 %. FILLER2 PLIES FILLER2 KEWLAR08 OZ WOWN

FILLER3 %. FILLER3 PLIES FILLER3 NO FILLER

PROFILE EXTRUSION PROCESS SPECIFIC INFORMATION

LENGTH OF THE PART IN.

FILLER2 NUMBER OF HOLLOW

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 33 Of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP <<APPLICATIONDOMANSOPPORTUNITY DENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE

TECHNICAL

EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S) CONSTRAINTS & RECUREMENTS IMPORTANCE IMPORTANC

WAITING FOR USER INPUT.

FIG. 42

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 34 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

PAMSSYS1, 2093 v. C. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULTATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP

<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITYIDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL

EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S) CONSTRAINTS & REOUREMENTS IMPORTANCE IMPORTANC

<< 1 >>

RELIABILITY

WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.

FIG. 43

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 35 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

a PAMSSYS1, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM W W HELP

<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY DENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL

EXISTING PRODUCT NEWSOLUTION(S)

MATERIAL USED DOWMATERIAL

CURRENT

8

WEARNET auxu

NETSHAPE NEWTO-THE-WORLD

WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.

FIG. 44

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 36 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

- PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENIS CONSULIATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP

<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE TECHNICAL

CAPABILITY

CUSTOMER

s i DOW WEAK

WAITING FOR USER INPUT.

FIG. 45

- PAMSSYS1, 2093 v FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULTATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM V V HELP

<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE BUSINESS

CUSTOMER MAJOR GOALS

PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENTS

WAITING FOR USER INPUT.

FIG. 46

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 37 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

PAMS syst, 2093 v. FILE ABOUT COMMENTS CONSULATIONS EXPLAIN MODE SYSTEM W W HELP

<<PREVIOUS OPPORTUNITY IDENTIFICATION PROTOTYPE BUSINESS

<<PREVIOUS DOW CUSTOMER INTEREST & BUSINESS

ABILITY TO BRAND AVERAGE

WAITING FOR USER INPUTI.

FIG. 47

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 38 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

?TER MTM WEIS?S HGOW NIWTdX? SNOIIVITOSNÕÕ SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÒZ ‘ISAS SWyd

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 40 0f 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 42 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

?TER MTM WEIS?S EGO W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÒZ ‘ISAS SWyd

US 6,220,743 B1 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 48 0f 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 49 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

?TIL, DJ ???ÇÇ TEMET

?TER MTM WHISKS HGOW NIWTdX? NOIIVIT/\SNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTIJ 86ÖZ ‘ISAS SWyd

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 50 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

?TER MTM WEIS?S EGO W NIWTdX? SNOLIVITOSNO? SINJWW00 10087 JTË 86ÖZ ‘ISAS SW7d=

| << ET NIIN00 ||

| ? | a |

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 54 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

HVJÁ/SIINI) ; 00000||

(GENIIN00) BdVHS

d?EF ATM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|I/II/ISNO? SINJWW00 10087 JT? 86DE ‘ISAS SWºd =

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 56 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

1437X0/70 103THS OI

W0/10/1008'd

?TER MTM WHIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 l/1087 JTË

| } |a| - 860, SASSW, E

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 59 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

N0/10/1008'd

?TER MTM WEIS?S ?GOW NIWTdX? SNO|I/III/SNO? SINJWWOO I/1087 JTË 8603 ‘ISAS SWyd =

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 61 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

| HWM-TOM

dTER MTM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNO|IWITI SNO? SINJWW00 l/1087 JTË 86?Z ‘ISAS SWyde=

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 62 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

0|100008'de S?f?OBEGNI)

dTER MTM WEIS?S 300W NIWTdX? SNOIIVITOSNO? SINJWW00 10087 TI? 86Ö? ‘ISAS SWyd =

N00) HdVHS

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 65 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001

86ÖZ ‘ISAS SWyd|=

U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 66 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 67 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

1) OPENINGS NEED TO BE COWERED YE

2) INSIDE OBJECTS NEED TO BE ATACHED LOCATED SEPARATED NONE OF THE ABOVE

3) OUTSIDE OBJECTS NEED TO BEATTACHED TO THE PART HANDLE OR MANIPULATE THE PART NEED TO BE LOCATED ON THE PART NEED TO BESEPARATED BY THE PART NONE OF THE ABOVE

INSIDESURFACE MUST BESMOOTH OUISIDESURFACE MUST BESMOOTH PROVIDESA GAP WITHA SUPPORTING SURFACE REOUIRES DIVIDINGSECTIONS

FIG. 77

GUI DYNAMICS 1 3 OBJECTS=NONE DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE" QUESTIONS 2, 3, 5,

DiSABLE ADDITIONS GUESiiONSi2 GUI DYNAMICS2 BASICSHAPE OF THE PART DOES NOT HAVE SYMMETRY OFREVOLUTION

DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE" OUESTIONS 10C

GUI DYNAMICS 3 OVERALL SHAPE IS FOLDED DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE"QUESTIONS 10B, PLATE 10C

GUI DYNAMICS 4 HASA CLOSED-SHAPE DISABLE"OVERALL SHAPE"QUESTIONS 10E CROSS-SECTION

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 68 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

1) OVERALL SHAPE CLASS

2) ATTACHMENTS REQUIRED

3) POSSIBLE SHAPEDECOMPOSITION

FIG. 79

LEGEND

MULTI-LINE TEXT

SINGLE OR MULTIPLE FIRST BOX

HELP BOX

FIG. 80

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 69 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

1) EXISTENCE OF OBJECTS TOTALTY ENCLOSED (ORSEPARATE COMPONENTS) PARTIALLY ENCLOSED

GOINIOUT THE PART NONE

2) ACCESS OF OBJECTS INSIDE YES Hi PART NECESSARY DURING NO

3) ORDER OF MAGNITUDE OF LARGEST OPENING COMPARED TO THE ORDER OF E5EGEEEEEEEE|39AFM OF THE OF THE PARTIS (INA DIRECTION PERPENDICULAR TO THE OPENING)

4) RELATION WITH A SOLIDSUPPORTING NO CONTACT SURFACE PART SHAPE PROVIDES ORIENTATION

PART SHAPE DOES NOT PROVIDE ORIENTATION ORIENTATION IS REQUIRED ORIENTATION IS NOT REQUIRED

5) RELATION WITH OTHER OBJECT PART SHAPE PROVIDES ORIENTATION PART SHAPE DOES NOT PROVIDE ORIENTATION

6) AESTHETICS NOT IMPORTANT A FACTOR VERY IMPORTANT

7) LOAD MAGNITUDE LARGE MEDIUM SMALL

FIG. 81

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 70 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

APPLICATIONS VA CHOOSE LEVEL 35APPLICATION DOMAIN (DOUBLE CLICK TO EXPTO LEVEL 45)

AGRICULTURAL AIRCRAFT APPLIANCES s :33:8:

BUILDIN COMPUTER & BUSINESSEQUIPMENT CONSUMERELECTRONICS FURNITURE HEALTHCARE HOSE TUBBING & PIPE HOUSEWARES INDUSTRIAL/MISC LAWN & GARDEN MARINE PERSONAL CARE RECREATION & LESURE TELECOMMUNICATION & DATA STORSGE TOYS

FIG. 82

PARTSPECIFICATIONS: SURFACE VA

SURFACE FINISH CLASSA NOT NECESSARY X 2.

COLOR PAINT EX 2

TEXTURE FINE X

TRANSPARENCY < > X 2.

FIG. 83

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 71 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

P PARTSPECIFICATIONS: SURFACE VA 4.

EXTERIORADDITIONS EXTERIOR PROJECTIONS EXTERIORRIBS

INTERIOR PROJECTIONS INTERIORRIBS

P PARTSPECIFICATIONS: MISCELLANEOUS VA

FEATURES

NONE

SHAPE CLASSES 3-D OPENED X 2.

DRAFT (DEGREE)> = <= D > X 2

INSIDE TOLERANCE IMPORIANT X 2. CONTROL

DELECTRIC 3-D OPENED X 2. PROPERTIES

PRODUCTION 100000 X VOLUME

FIG. 85

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 72 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

= PARTSPECIFICATIONS MECHANICAL VA

AMBENT MEDIUM TOUGHNESS

CREEPRESISTANCE Low I X 2.

FATIGUE MEDIUM IX 2 RESISTANCE

PART TOUGHNESS MEDIUM X 2.

PART STIFFNESS HIGH X 2.

WEAR-ABRASION LOW X 2 RESISTANCE

FIG. 86

p PARTSPECIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & LEGAL VA

EMISSIONS WARNING X 2.

ENVIRONMENTAL INO WARNING X 2. IMPACT

LEGAL WARNING TX

RECYCLABILITY WERNING

FIG. 87

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 73 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

p PARTSPECIFICATIONS ENVIRONMENT VA

CHEMICAL EXPOSURE

CHEMICAL-TYPES AMINES AROMATIC BASES CONCENTRATED BASES DILUTED

HYDROLYTIC STABILITY

190

HDT (t) { D > X 2.

COLD TEMPERATURE MEDIUM X TOUGHNESS

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 74 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

Lady>>'; |<<EMOWEJ SITTISH H SNO|10373S

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 75 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 76 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

SITTISH H N0||10373S

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 77 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 78 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

MESSAGE IV ATIENTION >>>>....THERE IS NO COMPATIBLE PROCESSES LEFT FORABS

ABS WILL NOT BE INCLUDED INFURTHER AWALYSES {SYS4 ANDECONOMICS) UNLESS SOME OF THE COMPATIBLE PROCESSES ARE RE-SELECTED, THE COMPATIBLE PROCESSESARE:

(EXTRUSION-BLOW-MOLDING-PROFILE-EXTRUSION ROTATIONAL-MOLDING THERMOPLASTIC-INJECTION-MOLDING DRAPE-FORMING MATCHED-MOLD-FORMING TWIN-SHEET-FORMING THERMOFORMING COMPRESSION-MOLDING)

FIG.91

MESSAGE IV THERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS FLUORINATED GRAPHITE FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES.

NHERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS GLASS FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES. fHERE IS NO PROCESS COMPATIBLE WITH EPOXY RESINS CROSSLINKABLE GRAPHITE FILLED IN THE ACTUAL LIST OF CANDIDATE PROCESSES.

FIG. 92

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 79 0f 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 81 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

ECONOMICS VA

PRODUCTION VOLUME (PARIS/YR) 100000 2

PART PROJECTED AREA (N12) 1 ?

PARTSURFACE AREA (N12) 2

PART THICKNESS (IN) 0.1 2 O

PART VOLUME(IN 3) f 2

PRODUCT LIFE (YEARS)

FIG. 95

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 82 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

PROCESSES AND MATERIAL FAMILES VA

PROCESSES FAMILIES

GASSED-ASSISTED-INJECTED-MOLDING REACTION-INNECTION-MOLDING

nPPO STRUCTFOAM E.

8

s

PC BLOWMOLD sg,

FIG. 96

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 83 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

PROCESSES AND MATERIAL FAMILES VA

PROCESSES FAMILIES

GASSED-ASSISTED-INJECTED-MOLDING LCP INUMOLD REACTION- TION-MOLDI is: mPPO EXTRUSION

mPPO INUMOLD mPPO STRUCTFOAM NYLON AMORPHOUS PC ABS PC ABS 10%GF PC ABS 20%GF PC ABS IR PC BLOWMOLD PC INIMOLD PC IR PC OPTICAL PC PBT PC PBT PC PBT 10%GF PC PBT 30%GF PC PET PC PET 10%GF PC PET 20%GF PC SHEET PC STRUCTFOAM POLYUREA PP COPOLYMERS 20%GF PP COPOLYMERS 30%GF PP COPOLYMERS 40%GF

&

fiftSifficitotitive

FIG. 97

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 84 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

p PROCESSES AND MATERAL FAMILIES VA s

PROCESSES FAMILIES

GASSED-ASSISTED-INECTED-MOLDING REACIONNECIONMOLDING SS

top existow M

rispyists

FIG. 98

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 85 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

STRUCTURAL REACTION INFECTIONMOLDING PROCESS SPECIFIC INFORMATION

LENGTH OF THE PART IN.

WDTH OF THE PART IN.

STRUCTURAL REACTION INJECTION MOLDING MATERIAL MODEL

PLEASE ENTERFILLER INFORMATION FORSRIRA POLYURETHANE 38% GF GRADE OF MATERIAL

FILLER 1 %FILLER 1 PLIES FILLER 1 GLASS MAT 1 OZ 0

FILLER2 %FILLER2 PLIES FILLER2 GLASS MATCSM M8605 0

FILLER3 %FILLER3 PLIES FILLER3 NO FILLER 0 0

OK OK

FIG 100

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 86 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

ANALYSES RESULIS v A

PROCESSES FAMILIES DEMINSIONCN) WEIGHT(b) COSTPART(8) SIRUCTURE REACTIONNECTIONMOLDING SIRM-POZYUREIHAME-30%GF O. O.09 83.64 SIRUCTURE REACTIONNECTIONMOLDING SIRM-POZYUREIHAME-60%GF 0 003 $140 THEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-8%GF 0 1 003 8038 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-20%GF O. O.09 8040 THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-30%GF O. O. SO43 THEROPASIC-MECTIONMOLDING ABS-40%GF O. O. SO44 IHEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-HIHEAT 0 003 $432 IHEROPASTICIMIECTIONMOLDING ABS-IN MOD 0 003 $4.38 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ABS-IP 0 009 $434 THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING ABS-PLAYING 0 003 NIDO THEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS-701-GF40 Of 0.11 S856 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS-701-GR60 Of O2 S862 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS 202-LGFAO O. O. 11 88.65 THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING IOSPAS 202-LGF60 Of Of2 S862 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING ICP-MARGOD O. O. NIDO THEROPIASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING IIPPOMARIGOD O. O.09 $429 IHEROPIASIC-INVECTIONMOLDING MOM-AMORPHOUS O. O.08 NIDO IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS O. O.08 S830 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS-10%GF O. O.09 S834 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCABS-20%GF 0 009 $837 IHEROPASIC-MECTIONMOLDING PCABS-6 O. O.08 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCIRPHOIDE O. O.03 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PC-06 O. O.09 S835 IHEROPIASIC-MECONMOLDING PC-SPECIAL O. O.09 S835 IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PC-BPS O. O.03 NIDO IHEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPB.0%GF O. O.03 MIDO HEROPIASIC-MECTIONMOLDING PCPB-20%GF O. O.3 NIDO THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPEI O. O.09 NIDO THEROPIASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PCPE.10%GF 0 009 MIDO IHEROPASIC-IVECTIONMOLDING PCPEP20%GF O. Of NIDO THEROPASIC-INVECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-20%GF Of 007 SO.19 IHEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-80%GF Of THEROPASIC-NECTIONMOLDING PPCOPOLYMERS-40%GF 0.

FIG. 101

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 87 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

a MICROSOFTEXCEL-Ecosys95.XLW VA PFILE EDT FORMULA FORMAI DATA OPTIONS MACRO

WINDOW HELP

de BIA A

WORKBOOK CONTENTS

EEE INJECTIONMOLDING-------------------------------------------------------------. EE DECASTING -------------------------------------------------------------. EEE PROFILE EXTRUSION-------------------------------------------------------------- EEE EXTRUSION BLOWMOLDING ---------------------------------------------------- EEE EXTRUSIONTHERMOFORMING...................................................

EEE TABLE XLS------------------------------------------------------------------------ de SPECIFICXLM--------------------------------------------------------- de MACR01------------------------------------------------------------------------- EEE ENGINEERING--------------------------------------------------------------------- p EEE FILLERDAIA ----------------------------------------------------------------------

ADD REMOVE

FIG. 102

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 88 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

p MICROSOFTEXCELECOSYS95.XIWS VA FILE SELECTION DESIGN ECONOMICS HELP

SELECT ONE FAMILY SELECT ONE OR SEVERAL FAMILIES

ABS-18%GF ABS-18%GF ABS-38%GF ABS-28%GF ABS-45%GF ABS-33%GF ABS-34%GF ABS-46%GF ABS-HIHED ABS-HIHED ABS-TNUMOLD ABS-INUMOLD ABS-IR ABS-IR ABS-PIPE ABS-PIPE ABS-PLATING ABS-PLATING ABS-SHEET ABS-SHEET ABS-STRUCTFOAM ABS-STRUCTFOAM ABS-TPU ABS-IPU ACID-COPOLYMER ACRLICS-COPOLYMER ACID-HOMOPOLYMERS ACRLICS-HOMOPOLYMER ACRYLICS ALUMINUM-355/356 ALUMINUM-355/356 ALUMINUM-368 ALUMINUM-368 ALUMINUM-388/384 ALUMINUM-388/384 ALLUMINUM-SHEET ALUMINUM-SHEET ASA ASA ARDEL ARDEL BM-38%GRAPH BM-38%GRAPH BM-56%GRAPH BM-655GRAPH EPOXY RESINS-38%GF EPOXY-RESINS-38%GF EPOXYRESINS-35%GRAPH EPOXY RESINS-35%GRAPH

FIG. 103

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 89 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

(N)SNOISNEWIQ ? SHITIWWA

I?HSTWINIWTTW 803 (N) SSHNXOIHI JHI HEINE JSVETd

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 90 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

E MODELS AND FAMILES IVA

MODELS FAMILIES

CIRCULAR PLATE-FXED ABS-HIHEAT CIRCULAR PLATE-SIMPLYSUPPORTED ABS-MMOLD EQUAL-LEGGED-ANGLE EQUILATERAL-TRIANGLE-PLATE HOLLOW-CIRCULAR HOLLOW-RECTANGULAR HOLLOW-SQUARE-ROIATED-45 |PROFILE LPROFILE

SOLID-RECTANGULAR SOLID-SOUARE SOLID-SOUARE-ROIATED-45 ALUMINUM-SHEET SYMMETRIC-HAT ASA TEE AZDEL IHIN-AMWULAR BM-30%GRAPH U-PROFILE-CHANNEL BM-65%GRAPH

EPOXYRESINS-30%GF EPOXYRESINS-35%GRAPH EPOXYRESINS-65%GRAPH EYRESINS-70%GF

FIG. 105

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 91 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

p RECTANGULAR PLATEEDGESIMPLY SUPPORTED VA s

CONSTRAINTS

LOAD (Ibf): 10

DEFLECTION (M) 00031207

LENGTH (IN) 10

DIMENSIONS (IN) 0.86794.1963

MODEL VALIDITY TES

FIG. 106

US 6,220,743 B1 Sheet 92 of 103 Apr. 24, 2001 U.S. Patent

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 94 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

MICROSOFTEXCEL-ECOSYS95.xls IVA FFLE EDT FORMULA FORMAT DAIA OPTIONS MACRO WINDOW HELP

NORMAL SBIAA RECIPLAEFXB 4

A B C D E F G H II A PMSSYS944094-MECHANICALANAYSES (STANDARDSHAPES)

(QCOPYRIGHT THEDOWCHEMICAL COMPANY

6 COLORISED FORDEAP DOWCWFIDEVA

8 COLORFORDEMPIOIPI 9 COLORISEFORDECIPI

HYPOTHESES MODESASEACOMSAVIATICKESS BEINGMODE AVERALENGINEERINGPROPERIES

YOVGMODIS 4SE-04 (PS) f 15 PARGENERCDIMESOS

SPAN E.ON OVERALSIFFESCCATIONS

MOMENT OFWERIS 366-07 N° 4 20ERAILSIFFNESS 167E-4 (NAS)

CONSTRAWSANDBEAMEONATION LOAD IOE-03

2MAXIMUMDEFECTION 3MAXWBONDINGNOMEW fif 4AXIMSTRESS 3.84E+10 BFFY2 5 DISTANCEFROM THE CENIROIDIOTHE EXIREMEFIBER IISE-00 IV

MODEADIY BEAMAXIMUMSOPE OOSSHOULDBE (927 RADAS

2RATRAREAD SOIOSSAPPLICABLE OSION FORTHEECONOMICODES

AVERAGENATHICKESS O767SR22 2SRACEARE SIA: 3 PROJECTEDAREA s 2 40AE All-SE

REGINGAPAIEDGESIPISA SOLDREGIANGIEHOLOWRECIAGE ECHWE CHOOSEHESANDARDSHAPE AODE- E. CRGIARPAIESPYSPO CHOOSETHEAXIS SOVER NXPTEST

OFDMDASION SOVERTEST I HASCOWERGED TOCURRENTSOLUTION XPCHOICE

2 CAMOT IMPROVE THE GIRRENSOLICY 3HASTEMAXIMIMEORKERATIONLI 4 REACHEDAPOWWHERETHEVALUESDO NOTCHANGE SCIDMOTFWDAFEASBESOLION 7 FOUND THAT THELINEARY CONDITIONSWOTSAISHED 8ECOWEREDAWERRORIAE 9 DOES NOTAEEOIGHEORYAAIBE OSISEDEYANOTHERSESON OFMCROSOFTECE. |:

D

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 95 of 103 US 6,220,743 B1

114

ENTERPART 112 Si:SES 116 118 CHOOSE p EMEY ENTERREQUIRED ENTERKNOWN

APPLICATION -MEgypal PARTFEATURES SHAPE CLESS - SURFACE

- MISCELLANEOUS 113 117

SHAPE DEFAULT SELECTION REQUIREMENTS RESULTS

110

PROCESS AND

MATERAL SELECTION RESULTS

120

STRUCTURAL. 125 130 AWALYSIS FOREACH

MATERIAL OPTION - PLATES

REQUIRED PART ECONOMIC THICKNESS FOR MODELS FOR EACH MATERIAL EACH PROCESS

- SHELLS OPTION OPTION - BEAMS

- EOUWALENT THICKNESS

135 PART COST FOREACH MATERIAL/ PROCESS OPTION

FIG 110

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 96 of 103

FIG. 111A

FIG. 111B

FIG. 111D

FIG. 111E

FIG. 111F | FIG. 111G

FIG. 111C

FIG. 111

US 6,220,743 B1

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 97 of 103

START 200

LOAD KNOWLEDGE 202

BASES

205 LOADDAIA BASES

207 INTIALIZE

DEFAULT VALUES

209 STARTUSER INTERFACE

THIS ALSO GET 211 FEEDS THE

APPLICATION "PROCESS FILTER" REQUIREMENTS

THIS ALSO PRESENTA 213 FEEDS THE VARITY OF

PREDEFINED APPLICATIONS

TO USER

His: USERSELECTSA PARTICULAR 25"PROCESS FILTER APPLICATION

(e. gigs NG THIS FEEDS

CAMCORDER") THE "DESIRED MATERAL PROFILE"

SYSTEM LOADS 218 DEFAULTS VALUES

FOR GIVEN APPLICATIONS

USERREFINES/ 220 MODIFIES WALUES ACCORDINGLY

F.G. 111A

247

230 "MECHANICAL MODELS"

227

st

US 6,220,743 B1

243 THIS FEEDS THE "DESIRED MATERAL PROFILE"

242

THIS FEEDS THE MECHANICAL MODELS

241

USER REFINES/ MODIFIES WALUES ACCORDINGLY

240

SYSTEM LOADS DEFAULTWALUES

FOR GIVEN SHAPE

238

USERSELECTSA PARTICULAR

SHAPE

236 PRESENTA COLLECTION

OF PREDEFINED . SHAPES TO

USER

233

GET SHAPE SPECIFICATION

31

SHAPE SELECTION

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001 Sheet 98 0f 103 US 6,220,743 B1

(A) 249 251 253

DERVE DERIVE USE

E. ERR, APPLICATION

USE SHAPE SPECIFICATION

258 265 263

260 PATTERN-MATCH

USESSA | | A.S.E PRE-SELECT SPECIFIED BY FUNCTIONAL CC) MATERIALS THE DESIRED WALUES STORED

MATERAL IN THE MATERALS DATA BASE

280 275 278 PATTERN-MATCH THE

IDENTIFYTHOSE PER-SELECTED MATERIALS PRE-SELECTION PROCESSES THAT AGAINST THE MATERIALS FABRICATION CAN FABRICATE A999ESES-CD PROCESSES EACH OF THE CAPABLE OFFABRICATING

PRE-SELECTED LOOK UPDATA STORED MATERALS IN THE PROCESSES

DATA BASE

FIG. 111B

U.S. Patent Apr. 24, 2001

255

"TRANSLATE" OR MAPAPPLICATION REQUIREMENTS AND SHAPE INFORMATION

TO PREDEFINED FUNCTION WALUES

SELECT THOSE MATERALS IN

DATA BASE WHOSE FUNCTIONAL WALUES CLOSELYMATCH THE DESIRED MATERIAL

PROFILE

288

EACH PRE-SELECTED MATERAL MAYBE

ACCOMMODATED BY MORE THAN ONE

FABRICATION PROCESSES

Sheet 99 of 103

287

SOME PRE-SELECTED MATERIAL MAY NOT BE ACCOMMODATED BY MORE THAN ONE

FABRICATION PROCESSES

293 THERE MAYBE KNOWN

FABRICATION PROCESSES THAT ARE NOT"CALLED FOR" BYANY OF THE

PRE-SELECTED MATERALS

FIG. 111C

268 GENERATE

RATIONALE FOR PRE-SELECTING

CERTAIN MATERALS

GENERATE RATIONALE FOR REJECTING CERTAIN

MATERALS

283

GENERATEFURTHER RATIONAL FOR PRE-SELECTING

CERTAIN PROCESSES

292

GENERATEFURTHER RATIONALE FOR

REJECTING CERTAIN PRE-SELECTED MATERALS

298

GENERATE RATIONALE FOR

REJECTING CERTAIN PROCESSES

US 6,220,743 B1