us congressional budget office (cbo) presentation: federal budget math

Upload: wmartin46

Post on 07-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    1/16

    Congressional Budget Office

    Presentation at the

    Federal Reserve Bank of New York

    Federal Bud et Math:

    We Cant Repeat the Past

    June 16, 2011Douglas W. Elmendorf

    Director

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    2/16

    Total Federal Deficits and Surpluses

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    Actual Projected

    Baseline

    Percentage of GDP

    2

    1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021

    -12

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -12

    -10

    -8

    -6

    -4

    Continuation of

    Certain Policies

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    3/16

    Federal Debt Held by the Public

    80

    100

    120

    80

    100

    120Actual Projected

    Continuation

    of Certain

    Policies

    Percentage of GDP

    3

    1940 1949 1958 1967 1976 1985 1994 2003 2012 2021

    0

    20

    40

    60

    0

    20

    40

    60

    ase ne

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    4/16

    Key Aspects of Federal Budget Policy during the

    Past 40 Years

    Revenues have averaged about 18 percent of GDP, with

    substantial variation around that level but no trend.

    Older Americans have received:

    Cash payments that have risen with average wages (throughSocial Security),

    4

    Health insurance with a significant defined-benefit subsidy(through Medicare), and

    Additional subsidies for health insurance and subsidized long-term care (through Medicaid) for many of those with very high

    medical costs or little income and assets.

    Defense spending has trended down relative to GDP.

    Outlays for all other federal programs have shown substantial

    variation relative to GDP and a slight downward trend.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    5/16

    Total Federal Revenues

    Percentage of GDP

    20

    22

    24

    20

    22

    24Actual Baseline Projection

    5

    1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021

    0

    14

    16

    18

    0

    14

    16

    18

    Average Revenues,

    1971 to 2010

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    6/16

    Average Federal Tax Rates by Quintile

    20

    25

    30

    Highest Quintile

    Fourth Quintile

    Percent

    6

    1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

    0

    5

    10

    15

    Middle Quintile

    Second Quintile

    Lowest Quintile

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    7/16

    Outlays for Social Security and Major Health Care

    Programs

    Percentage of GDP

    4

    5

    6

    Social Security

    Actual Baseline Projection

    7

    1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021

    0

    1

    2

    3

    Medicare

    Medicaid, CHIP, and Exchange Subsidies

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    8/16

    Other Components of Federal Spending

    Percentage of GDP

    5

    6

    7

    8

    DefenseDiscretionary

    Actual Baseline Projection

    8

    1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016 2021

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Mandatory Spending Other ThanSocial Security, Medicare, Medicaid,

    CHIP, and Exchange Subsidies

    Non-Defense

    Discretionary

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    9/16

    Federal Employees

    Millions Percent

    5

    6

    7

    8

    8

    10

    12

    Number of

    Federal Employees

    (left axis)

    9

    1971 1974 1977 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Federal Employees as a

    Share of the Total Workforce

    (right axis)

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    10/16

    Shares of Federal Spending in 2010

    Percent

    Transfer payments to people in the United States 47

    10

    ran s o s a e an oca governmen s

    Purchases of goods and services for defense 19

    Purchases of goods and services for nondefense 9

    Interest 8

    Other (includes transfers to people outside the U.S.) 4

    Source: National Income and Product Accounts.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    11/16

    Trends in Federal Spending during the Past 40 Years

    The costs of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and

    the Childrens Health Insurance Program have risensubstantially relative to GDP, from 4.3 percent in 1971to 8.7 percent in 2007 (before the recession).

    11

    Defense spending has fallen substantially relative toGDP, from 7.3 percent in 1971 to 3.9 percent in 2007.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    12/16

    We Cannot Repeat the Past in the Federal Budget

    Given the aging of the population and the rising cost of

    health care, the United States cannot achieve all of the

    following objectives in the future:

    Keep federal revenues at their average share of GDP

    12

    ur ng e pas years.

    Provide the same sorts of benefits for older

    Americans that we have provided in the past 40years.

    Operate the rest of the federal government in line withits role in the economy and society during the past 40

    years.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    13/16

    Components of the Federal Budget

    (percentage of GDP)

    1971-2010Average

    2021March

    BaselineProjection

    2021Presidents

    BudgetEstimate

    2022Ryan

    ProposalEstimate

    Revenues 18.0 20.8 19.3 18 1/2

    13

    Outlays 20.8 23.9 24.2 20 1/4

    Noninterest outlays 18.6 20.5 20.3 17

    Interest 2.2 3.4 3.9 3 1/4

    Deficit 2.8 3.1 4.9 2

    Note: The Ryan proposal was estimated relative to an earlier baseline, so the figures are not precisely comparable to the latest baselineprojection or estimates for the Presidents budget.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    14/16

    Noninterest Outlays (percentage of GDP)

    1971-2010Average

    2021March

    BaselineProjection

    2021Presidents

    BudgetEstimate

    2022Ryan

    ProposalEstimate

    Noninterest Outlays 18.6 20.5 20.3 17

    Social Securit

    14

    Major health programs 2.9 6.9 7.1 5 1/2

    Defense 4.8 3.6 3.1

    }6

    Other mandatory spendingand nondefense discretionaryspending

    6.7 4.6 4.8

    Note: Major health programs include Medicare, Medicaid, the Childrens Health Insurance Program, and exchange subsidies. The Ryan

    proposal was estimated relative to an earlier baseline, so the figures are not precisely comparable to the latest baseline projection or estimatesfor the Presidents budget.

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    15/16

    Outlays for Major Programs Compared with Total

    Revenues Under a Continuation of Certain Policies

    Percentage of GDP

    20

    22

    Outlays for Social Security,Major Health Programs,

    Defense, and Net Interest

    Actual Projected

    152008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

    0

    14

    16

    18Total Revenues

  • 8/6/2019 US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Presentation: Federal Budget Math

    16/16

    The Choices Confronting Policymakers

    The question is not whether to change current policies,

    but when and in what ways.

    There are trade-offs regarding the timing of implementingpolicy changes, but there are important benefits and few

    16

    apparent costs to deciding about those changes soon.

    Fiscal policy cannot be put on a sustainable path just byeliminating waste and inefficiency; instead, changes will

    need to significantly affect popular programs, peoplestax payments, or both.