university of missouri shared services initiative phase ii november 1, 2010

10
University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Upload: philip-charles

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

University of MissouriShared Services Initiative

Phase IINovember 1, 2010

Page 2: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Update on Phase I

• Comprehensive benchmarking study led by Accenture using Hackett methodology

• Over 250 staff engaged system wide over the last 6 months to benchmark administrative activities in HR, Finance, IT and Procurement

• Goal was to identify opportunities for adoption of shared services principles

Page 3: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

• A customer-focused organizational model that consolidates operations in order to reduce inefficiencies and duplicative costs, and increase customer service. It can take many forms on a continuum anywhere from consolidating transactions within a division or campus all the way to a separate standalone entity that can serve the needs of the entire system — possibly even other colleges and universities throughout the state.

Reminder – what is shared services?

3

Page 4: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

What we learned

4

• Many processes are operating at a lean per unit cost• Cost of functions, however, are often high due to:

• Policy expectations and a larger number of transactions• Manual processing retained in spite of technology implemented• IT capabilities (e.g. self service) not fully used to automate

processes • Transactions staffed fractionally – lots of generalists

classified as clerical throughout the organization• Technology implemented with higher priorities than

“delighting the end user”• Difficult to cut costs without cutting services

Page 5: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Where do we go from here?

• By implementing shared services philosophies and principles we can achieve:• Improved customer relationships through

consistent high-quality service• Reduced operating costs• Increased productivity• Increased leveraging of investment in technology• Enhanced opportunity for process reengineering

Page 6: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Guiding Principles

• To guide process improvement and efficiency efforts for the University of Missouri System the following shared services principles will guide our efforts:• Delighting the ultimate customer or end user is the top

priority• Extensively use service level agreements, metrics, etc. to

foster accountability and emphasize roles and responsibilities and measure cost containment and savings realized

• Standardization and consistency in processes used to drive out cost, improve service, and reduce rework

• Over-communicate to customers, stakeholders, functional staff, technical staff, etc.

6

Page 7: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Guiding Principles Cont’d

• Ensure that all new administrative projects are rooted in these guiding principles

• Involve people in these projects with creativity, vision and openness to innovation

• Recognition of technical diversity; priority is to standardize where possible but recognize the need for flexibility when necessary as it supports the academic enterprise

• Ensure that a change management process occurs throughout the organization such that the full benefits of innovation are realized (e.g. do not retain the steps of an old process in addition to the new one)

7

Page 8: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

Guiding Principles Cont’d

• Aggregate transactions at a division, campus or system level as it makes sense to do so taking into context:• Standardized policies exist• Cost/benefit analysis suggests it is a good fit• Level of automation achieved in the transaction• Quality of service provided• Degree to which knowledge of the activity around

which the transaction is generated is necessary• Not a one-size-fits-all and should be determined

function by function

Page 9: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

What does this mean for this project?

• Ensure stakeholder feedback is sufficient (e.g. focus groups, participation in design process, purposeful change management process, etc.)

• Consistent use of process mapping across all projects• Question everything – decision points from process mapping

must be analyzed for policies, timelines, design assumptions, etc. to maximize technology and the new process

• Standardize and aggregate transactions (requires efforts to change cultures throughout the organization)

• Mods, bolt-ons, etc. should be considered when necessary to provide stakeholders with best experience

• Need to establish metrics to measure and demonstrate success of implementation

Page 10: University of Missouri Shared Services Initiative Phase II November 1, 2010

8 Steps to Successful Change1

1. Increase urgency – inspire people to act2. Build the guiding team – right people with right emotional

commitment3. Establish the vision – simple and creative4. Communicate for buy in – involve as many as possible,

simplify, and be responsive5. Empower action – remove obstacles, enable constructive

feedback6. Create short-term wins – bite-sized chunks7. Don’t let up – foster and promote determination and

persistence8. Make Change Stick – reinforce the value of success!

1The Heart of Change, John Kotter, 1995