universal efimov spectrum & interaction-induced zero mode...
TRANSCRIPT
Universal Efimov spectrum & interaction-induced zero mode transport in graphene
Reinhold Egger
Natal Workshop17-21 Aug 2015
Outline Brief introduction to graphene Electric dipole potential via adatoms
Universal Efimov scaling of bound state energies Prediction: observable in tunnel spectroscopy
De Martino, Klöpfer, Matrasulov & Egger, PRL 112, 186603 (2014)
Magnetic graphene waveguide: e-e interaction induced zero-mode conductance Flat E=0 band: no conductance without interactions Can interactions generate finite conductance for zero
modes? Yes they can! Characteristic filling dependence of conductance
Cohnitz, Häusler, Zazunov & Egger, PRB in press(arXiv:1506.05362)
Graphene: Tight binding description
Basis contains two atoms; nearest-neighbor hopping connects different sublattices:
Pseudospin
nmdda 14.0,3 ==
Wallace, Phys. Rev. 1947
Low energy limit
Two independent corner points K, K´ in 1st Brillouin zone
Valence and conduction bands touch K, K´ at E=0 „Dirac point“ = Fermi points in
undoped graphene Low energy:
Dirac light cone dispersion Emergent Lorentz invariance Smooth perturbations: no valley mixing!
( )
sec/10300 6 mcvKkq
qvqE
F
F
=≈
−=
±=
Relativistic quantum mechanicsLow energy continuum limit: only momenta close to K or K´ matter:relativistic Dirac Hamiltonian
Dirac spinorPauli matrices in pseudospin space:
Experimental confirmation for massless Dirac fermions in graphene monolayers:
cyclotron resonance and „half-integer“ quantum Hall effect
00 σσ VAceivH F +
+∇−⋅=
),(),( χφ=Ψ yx),( yx σσσ =
Novoselov et al., Nature 2005, Zhang et al., Nature 2005
Dirac fermion massFinite mass gap ∆ can (for example) be induced by strain effects (artificial) spin-orbit couplings substrate superlattice finite-size effects
first without magnetic field:
( ) ( ) 00 , σσσσ yxVivH zyyxxF +∆+∂+∂−=
potential e.g. due to adatoms
STM manipulation of charged impuritiesCrommie group, Nature Phys. 2012, Science 2013
Eva Andrei group, PRL 2014
charge on individual monomer is gate-tunable
Part I: Universal bound-state spectrum for gapped graphene in a dipole potential
Electric dipole in graphene
Dirac problem in electrostatic potential of two oppositely charged impurities ±Q at distance d
At long distance >> d: electric dipole potential, dipole moment p=Qd
Particle-hole symmetry: Energy spectrum comes in ± pairs, no zero mode!
De Martino, Klöpfer, Matrasulov & Egger, PRL 112, 186603 (2014)Gorbar, Gusynin & Sobol, arXiv:1506.08379
( )( ) ( )
2
2222
cos
2/2/,
rp
ydx
Q
ydx
QyxV
θ−→
+−−
++=
Qualitative pictureCoulomb impurities (e.g. Co atoms) arranged by STM tip
→ probe tunneling DoS by tunnel spectroscopy Wang et al. (Crommie group), Nature Phys. 2012 and Science 2013;
Luican-Mayer et al. (Eva Andrei group), PRL 2014
Near band edge Consider E=-∆+ε near (lower) band edge Dirac equation maps to effective Schrödinger equation
for „large“ (lower) spinor component
Solvable by separation ansatz Angular part: Mathieu functions Radial part: MacDonald functions
Dipole potential leads to universal hierarchy of infinitely many bound states
( ) 0,cos21
22 =
++∇
∆θχεθ r
rp
( ) ( ) ( )θθχ YrRr =,
Angular problem
With separation constant γ, angular part obeys energy-independent Mathieu equation
2π periodic solutions exist only at characteristic values
Quantum numbers: Parity κ=± & „angular momentum“ j=0,1,... (with j+κ>-1)
Mathieu functions
( ) 0cos22
2
=
∆−+ θθγ
θYp
dd
( )pj κγγ ,=
( ) ( )( ) ( )∆=
∆=
−
+
pYpY
jj
jj
4,2/se4,2/ce
2,
2,
θθ
θθ( ) ( )
( ) ( )∆=
∆=
−
+
pbp
pap
jj
jj
441
441
2,
2,
γ
γ
Radial problem
Radial equation
General solution (with decay at ∞) isMacDonald function Divergent at origin: fall-to-center problem Regularize by Dirichlet condition at r=r0=d/4
precise value from comparison to full solution of two-center problem
Eigenenergies follow from zeroes of MacDonald function: zeroes exist only when γ<0
( )pj κγγ ,=
( ) 02122
2
=
∆−−+ rR
rdrd
rdrd εγ
( )rK ∆εγ 2
Bound state energies
Bound state energies come in towers (radial quantum number n=1,2,...) at given (j,κ) Tower (j,κ) appears only above critical dipole
strength p>pj,κ where γj,κ(p) <0 lowest tower (j=0, κ=+) always realized
Universal Efimov scaling
Efimov scaling (within tower) involves universal numbers
accumulation of bound states near band edge infinitely many bound states in each tower
... reflects the long-distance behavior of the dipole potential, cf. three-boson problem
Efimov scaling follows also from Abramov-Komarov asympotic solution of full two-center problem
( )( )
0),0(,
,956.0,2
,, >
+=
∆−
∆=
jj
ppp
sj
j
κ
κκ
κπ
εε ,/21 js
n
n e−+ =
Density distribution
Mathieu functions: characteristic asymmetric angular features
MacDonald function explains radial density distribution
Probe by tunneling spectroscopy !
5=∆p
1=n 2=n
( )+,0
( )−,1
Away from band edge: Numerical diagonalization of Dirac equation
Numerics for dipole potential: graphene disk of radius 40d
No zero modes !
Part II: Interaction-induced zero mode conductance
Orbital magnetic field
Now consider inhomogeneous magnetic field & massless case
Single-particle problem: Dirac equation
relativistic Landau levels for homogeneous caseInhomogeneous fields: Confine electrons in magnetic dots, guide electrons in channels, magnetic barriers ...
De Martino, Dell‘Anna & Egger, PRL 2007
AeyxBB z
×∇== ),(
( ) Ψ=Ψ⋅
+∇− EyxA
ceivF σ
,
Inhomogeneous magnetic fields
Almost arbitrary magnetic field profiles can be experimentally created Deposition of lithographically defined
ferromagnetic layers on graphene covered by thin insulating layer Cerchez, Hugger, Heinzel, Schulz, PRB 2007
Here: disorder-free (clean) case Another possibility: strain-induced pseudo-
magnetic fields
Magnetic graphene waveguide (MGW) Magnetic field reversed within
central strip of width d Precise form of field profile
not important Classical snake orbits along
zero field lines: waveguide Quantum-mechanical
dispersion relation?
Magnetic length
Magnetic energy
eBclB =
BFB lvE /=
Single-particle problem
Landau gauge
Momentum (k) conserved along waveguide
Particle-hole symmetry:Inversion symmetry:
( )
2/2/||2/
,,,
)(
ˆ
dxdxdx
dxxdx
BxA
exAA y
><−<
−−+
⋅=
=
( ) ( )xeL
yx
EH
kniky
ykn
knknkn
,,
,,,0
1, ψ=Ψ
Ψ=Ψ ( ) ( )( )
=
xix
xkn
knkn
,
,, χ
φψ
1D states
real functions
knkn EE ,,0 −≠ −=
knkn EE ,, =−
Single-particle spectrum
Match wavefunctions in different regions with constant field (then expressed in terms of parabolic cylinder functions)
Ghosh, De Martino, Häusler, Dell‘Anna & Egger, PRB 2008
Probability maximum in x direction is at X ~ - k Approach to Landau
levels for |k|>>d Pair of snake states
(linear dispersion), electron- or hole-like
waveguide states: |k|<d Flat band (n=0) :
zero mode
Bld 2=
Zero mode band
Eigenstates for n=0:
All zero-mode current matrix elements vanishsince there is no upper spinor component
( )
( ) 2/2/
,
,1~
0
2222
/2/2/)/(/||
,0
,0,0
dxdx
ee
xi
B
BBBldx
kllxlxdk
kk
<>
⋅
=
−+−χ
χψ
0',0,0',0;,0 == ∫ +kykFkk dxvI ψσψ
Transport through finite-energy bands
If Fermi level intersects n=1 band: transport through quantum-mechanical snake orbits
Snake states spatially well separated for d>lB → Weak disorder / irregularities in magnetic field irrelevant:conductance quantization
independent of n=1 band filling (i.e. Fermi momentum)
Include Coulomb interactions: no change in G at T=0 → Luttinger liquid
heG /2=
Häusler, De Martino, Ghosh & Egger, PRB 2008
What if zero mode is partially filled?
All zero-mode current matrix elements vanish→ without interactions conductance vanishes Finite-energy bands have quantized conductance,
qualitatively different Intra-band n=0 Coulomb interaction matrix
elements cannot generate upper spinor component →
Finite zero-mode conductance requires inter-band transitions !
Coulomb interaction consider 3D Coulomb interaction potential,
neglect retardation effects include image potential due to parallel
metallic backgate at distance D Interaction strength: effective fine structure
constant
For density n, typical kinetic energy Typical Coulomb energy:
nEk ~
nreEC ~~
2
rFrk
C
ve
EE
εεα 2.22
≈==
not tunable through density!
Conductance for partially filled zero mode: Strategy
1. Hartree-Fock theory for intra-band interactions → break huge degeneracy of zero mode band
2. Then: Perturbation theory in inter-band Coulomb matrix elements → Compute T=0 conductance from Kubo formula vs filling factor
degeneracy (index theorem): ( )22
2
B
yxs l
LdLN
π−
=
sNN=ν
HF theory for zero mode bandAfter projection to n=0 band: self-consistent calculation of HF parameters with constraint
→ HF orbital energies
kkk ccn ,0,0+=
∑ ==k
sk NNn ν
( ) ''
)0(';',
)0(0;', k
k
nkkqkk
nqkkk nVV∑ =
−==
= −=ε
5.02
===
αBldD
HF „single-particle“ dispersion Dips for |k|<d, correspond to waveguide states Pauli holes at boundaries also follow from d=0 analytical
considerations, do not contribute to conductance Interaction-induced Fermi momentum and Fermi velocity
Diagrammatic expansionConductance computed by perturbative expansion in powers of W = residual inter-band interactions
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e)
(f) (g)
First order diagrams: G=0 still holds
Second-order diagrams: G>0
Zero-mode conductance
0.1 0.15 0.2 0.250
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
G / G0 0 0.2 0.4 0.60
0.5
1G / G
0
Zero mode conductance
Pronounced dependence of G on filling factor Interplay of current matrix renormalization by virtual
inter-band transitions and electron-hole pair fluctuation effects
Both effects compete: minimum at finite filling No conductance quantization anymore! For finite-energy bands completely different behavior
Interaction-induced zero-mode conductor→ direct probing of electron-electron interactions
Cohnitz, Häusler, Zazunov & Egger, PRB in press (arXiv:1506.05362)
Summary
Introduction Electric dipole in graphene
Universal Efimov scaling for bound state energies Observable in tunnel spectroscopy
De Martino, Klöpfer, Matrasulov & Egger, PRL 112, 186603 (2014)
Magnetic graphene waveguide: interaction induced zero mode conductance Flat band: zero conductance without interactions! Can interactions generate finite conductance for zero
modes? Yes they can! Filling factor dependence of conductance
Cohnitz, Häusler, Zazunov & Egger, PRB in press (arXiv:1506.05362)
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!