united states district court western district of … · case 3:16-cv-00285-gcm document 165 filed...
TRANSCRIPT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLOTTE DIVISION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v. RICHARD W. DAVIS, JR.,
Defendant, and
DCG REAL ASSETS, LLC, et al.,
Relief Defendants.
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-285
RECEIVER’S SEVENTH REPORT
A. Cotten Wright as Receiver (the “Receiver”) for the assets of DCG Real Assets, LLC;
DCG Commercial Fund I, LLC; H20, LLC; DCG PMG, LLC; DCG PMF, LLC; Finely Limited,
LLC; DCG Funds Underwriting, LLC; DCG ABF Management, LLC; DCG Funds Management,
LLC; Davis Capital Group, Inc.; Davis Financial, Inc.; DCG Partners, LLC; DCG Real Estate
Development, LLC; Huntersville Plaza Phase One, LLC; Huntersville Plaza Phase Two, LLC;
North Lake Business Park, LLC; and Richard Davis Enterprises, LLC (collectively, the
“Receivership Defendants”), files this Receiver’s Seventh Report pursuant to this Court’s
Temporary Receivership Order entered on June 8, 2016, which was made permanent by Orders
entered on August 5, 2016 and September 22, 2016 (collectively, the “Receivership Order”).
This report focuses on the Receiver’s activities for the quarter ending December 31, 2017 (the
“Reporting Period”) in conformance with paragraphs 23 and 24 of the Receivership Order.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 1 of 22
2
I. SUMMARY OF RECEIVER’S ACTIVITIES
A. Summary of Operations.
Each of the Receivership Defendants had ceased operations before the receivership (the
“Receivership”) was filed. Therefore, the Receiver did not operate any business of the
Receivership Defendants during the Reporting Period and, likewise, will not be operating any
business of the Receivership Defendants during the pendency of this case.
With respect to Receivership operations, the Court entered its Order Establishing
Procedures for Miscellaneous Motions; Procedures for the Sale of Assets; and Case Closing
Procedures (the “Procedures Order”) on August 5, 2016, which sets out certain procedures to be
followed in this case. In particular, the Procedures Order outlines the process to be followed in
connection with sales of real property.
B. Cash on Hand / Receipts and Disbursements.
On June 23, 2016, the Receiver established an account for the Receivership at Rabobank,
N.A. Funds on deposit with Rabobank are insured by the F.D.I.C. A report as to activity in that
account through December 31, 2017 is attached as Exhibit A.
C. Description of Known Receivership Property.
The Receiver has continued her efforts to marshal and liquidate receivership property (the
“Receivership Assets”). On July 5, 2016, the Receiver and her counsel had a phone conference
with Defendant Richard Davis during which they requested information about a number of
Receivership matters. In particular, the Receiver asked Davis to identify any assets that he may
not have previously disclosed.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 2 of 22
3
Identification of Assets. Attached as Exhibit B is an updated chart listing all assets
identified by the Receiver as assets of the Receivership Defendants along with either the amounts
that the asset sold for or their estimated gross values, which either reflect the tax values or
appraised value of the parcels of real property listed on Ex. B. With respect to property that has
not been sold yet, recorded liens or litigation claims are noted in the descriptions of those
properties on Ex. B but have not been deducted from the values indicated. The Receiver’s
investigation of the validity of alleged liens and litigation claims will continue as various assets
are liquidated, and asset values will be adjusted accordingly. Information regarding specific
estate assets is summarized below.
(1) Real Property in Mecklenburg County, NC. The Receiver has previously
obtained limited title searches on each of the four (4) parcels of undeveloped real
property in Huntersville, Mecklenburg County, North Carolina.
(a) Property contiguous to the Town of Huntersville property. Two
parcels of Receivership property, 102 S. Old Statesville Road and 109 Gilead
Road, were surrounded by or adjacent to property owned by the Town of
Huntersville. Additionally, the Receiver foreclosed on deeds of trust held by
Aegis/DCG Asset Backed Fund, LLC, now known as DCG Commercial Fund I,
LLC, on a portion of two additional parcels that are contiguous to property owned
by the Town, identified as Mecklenburg County Tax Parcel Nos. 017-116-18 and
017-116-43. During the prior reporting period and with the approval of the Court,
the Receiver sold all the Receivership property adjacent to parcels owned by the
Town of Huntersville to the Town for a total sale price of $165,000.00.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 3 of 22
4
(b) Property titled to Finely Limited, LLC. The Receivership property
located at 11711 Alexandriana Road, Huntersville, North Carolina, is being
marketed for sale by the Receiver’s realtor, Trinity Partners.
(c) Property titled to Huntersville Plaza Phase One, LLC. During the
Reporting Period, the Receiver negotiated a contract for the sale of receivership
property located at 16614 Old Statesville Rd, Huntersville, NC for a gross sale
price of $700,000.00. That sale closed, with Court approval, on December 21,
2017, and the net proceeds were deposited to the Receivership account.
(d) Property titled to Davis Financial, Inc. The residential real
property located at 9137 Mount Holly-Huntersville Road, Huntersville, North
Carolina (the “Residential Property”), was sold during the Reporting Period. This
property was titled jointly to Davis Financial, Inc. and M.B. and Bina M. Shah.
Because the property required extensive repairs, two potential buyers backed out
of their sale contracts after the sales had been advertised in accordance with the
Case Procedures Order. Eventually, the Receiver and the Shahs agreed to accept
an offer of $140,000.00, a sale price that had previously been advertised, and that
sale closed on November 28, 2017.
Following the sale of the Residential Property, the Receiver negotiated
with counsel for the Shahs as to the appropriate allocation of the net sale proceeds
based on the respective interests held by the Shahs and the Receivership estate.
The Receiver disputed the validity of one of the three deeds pursuant to which
Davis Financial purported to transfer fractional ownership interests to the Shahs.
Additionally, the Receivership had borne the costs of maintaining the property
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 4 of 22
5
while was marketed. On December 15, 2017, the Court entered a Consent Order
whereby the Shahs agreed to accept 55% of the sale proceeds, less the 55% of the
expenses associated with maintaining the Residential Property, and the
Receivership retained 45% of the proceeds, net of the Receivership’s share of the
expenses.
(2) Real Property in McDowell County, N.C. As previously reported, the
Receivership obtained turnover of surplus tax foreclosure sale proceeds with respect to
property formerly owned by H20, LLC in McDowell County. Other McDowell County
property titled to H20, LLC was abandoned pursuant to an Order entered by the Court.
(3) Real Property in Grayson County, VA. During the Reporting Period, the
real property titled to H2O, LLC in Grayson County, Virginia, remained on the market
for a list price of $1,100,000.00. On April 24, 2017, the Court entered an Order
approving a proposed settlement with Ken Hageman, who had brought a pre-
Receivership complaint alleging a constructive trust as to the Grayson County Property.
Although previously the Receiver had negotiated as to the sale of the Grayson
County Property with an entity identified as Venture Corb, Inc., a Wyoming corporation,
that entity appeared to have lost interest during the Reporting Period. Meanwhile, the
Court has instructed the Receiver that she should negotiate a finder’s fee with Davis in
the event that he procures a buyer for Receivership property. Venture Corb’s principal,
Mr. Corbitt, was referred to the Receiver’s realtor by Davis.
(4) Real Property in Caldwell County, NC. The residential lot titled to
Richard Davis Enterprises, LLC located at 5330 Beacon Ridge, Granite Falls, Caldwell
County, North Carolina, remained on the market during the Reporting Period with an
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 5 of 22
6
asking price of $18,000.00.
(5) Bank Funds. During prior reporting periods, the Receiver obtained
turnover of funds held in various bank accounts owned by the Receivership Defendants
as set out in Ex. A. Despite having issued subpoenas to various banks, the Receiver did
not identify any additional funds.
(6) Disgorgement as to DCG Commercial Holdings, LLC and DCG
Commercial, LLC. During a prior reporting period, DCG Commercial Holdings, LLC
and DCG Commercial, LLC were dismissed from this case upon their compliance with
an Order requiring disgorgement of $13,677.57 to the Receivership account.
(7) Mining Claims. Early in the Receivership case, the Receiver confirmed
that no mining claims or interests were held by any of the Receivership Defendants as of
the date of the Receivership.
(8) Arbitration Award Regarding Willow Creek Mine. On April 10, 2015, an
Arbitration Award was made in favor of Ray E. Bluff against Davis, Davis Capital
Group, Inc., and Integrity Mining, LLC (the “Respondents”) relative to an agreement by
Davis Capital Group to purchase a fifty percent (50%) interest in Willow Creek Placer
Group, LLC, the owner of certain real property that is the site of the Willow Creek mine
in Pershing County, Nevada. The arbitration panel concluded that the full consideration
for the agreed-to purchase had not been provided and terminated whatever interest
Respondents held in Willow Creek Placer Group, LLC, if any. In addition, however, the
arbitration decision provided that Ray Bluff was to return $175,000.00 to the
Respondents provided that all equipment and living units belonging to them or under
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 6 of 22
7
their control were removed from the Willow Creek mine area within sixty (60) days (the
“Arbitration Award”).
Davis appealed the Arbitration Award with the Pershing County, Nevada, District
Court, which appeal was pending on the date of the Receivership. During the prior
reporting period, the Receiver’s attorneys entered into discussions of a possible resolution
of the Nevada civil action with attorneys for Ray E. Bluff. On August 25, 2017, the
Receiver filed a motion to approve a settlement of the Nevada litigation that provided for
dismissing the appeal and motion to vacate the arbitration award; allowing Guy Bluff to
file a claim in the Receivership Case, subject to the Receiver’s objection; and
acknowledging this Court’s exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether or not Bluff
should be required to pay the $175,000.00 Arbitration Award to the Receivership. On
September 15, 2017, Davis filed an opposition to that motion, and the Receiver filed a
reply. The Court entered an order approving the settlement motion on November 7,
2017.
(9) Mining Equipment. During prior reporting periods, the Receiver
identified certain mining equipment, vehicles, and the like that constitute Receivership
property existing in Nevada (the “Mining Equipment”). The Receiver opted to engage the
services of a private investigator to locate and retrieve the Mining Equipment. The
Receiver’s investigator, working together with local law enforcement and a heavy
equipment hauling company, attempted to take possession of the Mining Equipment;
however, certain individuals controlling the Mining Equipment refused to surrender
possession thereof to the Receiver. Thereafter, on June 2, 2017, the Receiver filed a
lawsuit to recover possession of the Mining Equipment and obtained a permanent
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 7 of 22
8
injunction freezing any disposition of the Mining Equipment and directing the defendants
(the “Mining Equipment Defendants”) to turn it over to the Receiver. During the
Reporting Period, the Receiver reached a settlement of the remaining claims in the
lawsuit with counsel for the Mining Equipment Defendants, and a motion to approve the
settlement was filed on October 26, 2017. The Court entered an order approving the
settlement motion on November 13, 2017.
Meanwhile, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers was approved by the Court to auction the
Mining Equipment and held auctions for certain of the Mining Equipment during the
Reporting Period. As of the close of the Reporting Period, the Receiver had not received
a settlement statement from Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers for the auction of the Mining
Equipment.
(10) Miscellaneous Personal Property.
(a) 2014 Dodge RAM 2500. During a prior reporting period, the
Receiver obtained an Order allowing a Dodge Ram that was titled to Richard
Davis Enterprises, LLC to be abandoned because it was encumbered by a lien that
exceeded its value.
(b) Personal Property Stored at 9137 Mount Holly-Huntersville Road.
During a prior reporting period, Mr. Davis removed his personal property from
the house at 9137 Mount Holly-Huntersville Road in accordance with an Order
entered by the Court.
D. Description of Claims Held by the Receivership Estate. Claims relative to the
Receivership’s real property interests are reported above. The Receiver has not yet identified
any other claims that may be held by the Receivership Estate.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 8 of 22
9
E. Communications with Investors. In accordance with her duties as Special
Master in the criminal case against Richard Davis (United States v. Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.,
3:16CR312 (W.D.N.C.)), the Receiver has provided updates to victim-investors through the
Receivership webpage and email notices. On December 3, 2017, Davis filed a motion to dismiss
the government’s indictment as to allegations of wire fraud and securities fraud, which drew a
response from the government on December 12, 2017. Davis filed a reply to the government’s
response on December 13, 2017. The trial in the criminal case is set for February, 2018.
Meanwhile, however, on December 12, 2017, the Receiver was informed that the
government is considering a plea agreement with Davis. If a plea agreement is reached, the
Receiver will give investor-victims as much notice as possible of the same.
Early in this case, the SEC provided the Receiver with lists of investors in the
Receivership Defendants. Additional parties have also contacted the Receiver indicating that
they were investors in one or more of the Receivership Defendants. The Receiver has contact
information for most of investors. However, there remain purported investors for whom the
Receiver does not have contact information. As additional investors are identified, their names
and contact information will be added to the investor list. Upon the Court’s direction, the
Receiver is prepared to file (under seal or otherwise) a list of purported investors known to the
Receiver.
The Receiver has received informal information as to certain creditors of the
Receivership Defendants, including the attorney who represented Davis Capital Group in the
Nevada arbitration and a Charlotte lawyer who represented Huntersville Plaza Phase Two, LLC
in filing for bankruptcy protection.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 9 of 22
10
On November 13, 2017, the Court entered Orders approving the Receiver’s fifth
application for compensation and the third application for compensation by Middleswarth
Bowers & Company (“Bowers”), the accountant for the Receiver. On December 28, 2017, the
Receiver made a partial distribution on approved fees for Grier Furr & Crisp. The Receiver
expects to pay approved professional fees in full in the next quarter in conformance with the SEC
Guidelines, which limit compensation and expense reimbursement available to the Receiver and
her professionals to thirty percent (30%) of any net recoveries.
F. Other Issues.
During the prior reporting period, the Receiver had received requests for information as
to any pre-receivership funds paid to certain relatives of Davis and from the Internal Revenue
Service. After searches of Receivership records proved inefficient and unproductive, the
Receiver requested that her accountants search the QuickBooks files for this information.
Ultimately, the Receiver’s accountants prepared an accounting satisfactory to the I.R.S. during
the Reporting Period.
G. Status of Claims Proceedings.
Claims Process. During the prior reporting period, the Receiver’s 93 claims were filed
by investors in accordance with procedures approved by the Court. The Receiver is in the
process of reviewing those claims. Ultimately, the Receiver intends to recommend to the Court
the allowance of the principal amount invested by each investor, not to include any profit that
may have been reported by the Receivership Defendants and, for purposes of distributions by the
Receiver, taking into account any withdrawals by investors.
Distribution Procedures. The Receiver intends to file a motion with the Court seeking
approval of a distribution procedure after reviewing the claims that were filed and upon
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 10 of 22
11
sufficient liquidation of Receivership assets. The Receiver will give investors notice and an
opportunity to object to the proposed distribution process when that motion is filed.
Net Winner Investors. As of the date of this Report, the Receiver has not identified any
investors as “net-winners” by virtue of their having withdrawn more than they invested in the
Receivership Defendants. To the extent that any such “net-winners” are identified, the Receiver
will determine the appropriate steps to take.
Distribution. Once the Receiver is satisfied from her investigation as to the amounts
invested by investors and any withdrawals taken by investors, and after the Court has approved
the Receiver’s proposed distribution method, the Receiver plans to recommend approval of an
interim distribution. Ultimately, all funds collected by the Receiver as property of the
Receivership Estate, less the costs of administration of the Receivership and any other
disbursements approved by the Court, will be available for distribution to investors.
G. Receiver’s Recommendations.
The Receiver recommends that the Receivership be continued in order to allow for
sufficient time to liquidate Receivership Assets for the benefit of the investors. At this point, the
Receiver cannot predict how long it will take to liquidate the various parcels of real property
owned by the Receivership Defendants, which reflect the bulk of the Receivership Estate.
Further, to the extent that litigating issues related to assets is necessary, that process would likely
take months. Accordingly, the Receiver is unable to forecast how long it will take to convert all
Receivership assets to cash, but will, by filing periodic reports, keep the Court and investors
apprised of her best estimate of the progress of the Receivership and the estimated time it will
take to conclude it.
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 11 of 22
12
Respectfully submitted, this 9th day of January, 2018.
/s/ A. Cotten Wright A. Cotten Wright (State Bar No. 28162) Grier Furr & Crisp, PA 101 North Tryon Street, Suite 1240 Charlotte, North Carolina 28246 Phone: 704.375.3720; Fax: 704.332.0215 [email protected] Exhibits:
A. Receipts and Disbursements B. List of Assets
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 12 of 22
EXHIBIT A
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 13 of 22
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 14 of 22
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 15 of 22
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 16 of 22
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 17 of 22
EXHIBIT B
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 18 of 22
Opened / Filed:
Case Asset Report
01/09/18Period Ending:
Trustee: A. Cotten Wright
Asset Description
Estimated Net Value
(Original Value
Less Liens, Exemptions,
and Other Costs)
Sale/Funds
Received by
the Estate
Asset Fully
Administered (FA)/
Gross Value of
Remaining Assets
Case Number:
Page: 1
3:16-CV-285 GCM
Ref. #
Case Name: DCG RECEIVERSHIP 06/08/16
(530380)
11711 Alexandriana Rd, Huntersville, NC - 13 acr
Parcel No. 017-051-06, Mecklenburg County, NC. Property titled to Finely Limited, LLC. Value
shown is appraised value as of 1/26/17. Tax value is $1,020,900. Currently listed for sale by Trinity
Partners. (See Asset #20 for compensation for sale of easement across this property.) (See Footnote)
846,000.00846,000.00 0.001
16614 Old Statesville Rd, Huntersville - 1.25 ac
Parcel ID No. 011-021-45, Mecklenburg County, NC. Property titled to Huntersville Plaza Phase
One, LLC. Property was sold on December 21, 2017. The lien in favor of receivership defendant DCG
Commercial Fund I, LLC, f/k/a Aegis / DCG Asset Backed Fund was released in connection with the
sale. The original value reflects appraisal dated 9/22/16.
FA550,000.00 700,000.002
102 S Old Statesville Rd, Huntersville - .04 ac
Parcel ID No. 017-116-11, Mecklenburg County, NC. Property is titled to DCG Commercial Fund I,
LLC. Value shown is tax value. Lien in the amount of $100,000 is held by receivership defendant
DCG Real Assets, LLC. Property at 109 Gilead Rd, Huntersville is collateral for the same lien. This
property is subject to a pending Court approved sale to the Town of Huntersville.
FA11,700.00 11,700.003
109 Gilead Rd, Huntersville, NC - .25 acres
Parcel No. 017-116-99, Mecklenburg County, NC. Property is titled to DCG Commercial Fund I, LLC.
Value shown is tax value. Property is subject to lien in the amount of $100,000 held by receivership
defendant DCG Real Assets, LLC. Property at 102 S Old Statesville Rd is subject to the same lien.
This property is subject to a pending Court approved sale to the Town of Huntersville.
FA114,600.00 114,600.004
Hwy 221, Marion, NC - 2 acres
Parcel No. 171700245000, McDowell County, NC. Property is titled to H2O, LLC. Property is subject
to a lien in the amount of $110,000 held by John Hyatt. This asset was abandoned pursuant to Order
entered on 9-16-16, DE 62.
FA0.00 0.005
Land & warehouse, Grayson County, VA - 305 acres
Lots 52-A-43, 52-A-43A & 52-A-43B, Grayson County, VA. Property is titled to H2O, LLC. The Court
has approved a settlement of litigation brought by Kenneth Hageman in Grayson County, VA in which
he claimed a constructive trust. Value shown is appraised value as of 1/5/2017. This property is
1,250,000.001,250,000.00 0.006
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 19 of 22
Opened / Filed:
Case Asset Report
01/09/18Period Ending:
Trustee: A. Cotten Wright
Asset Description
Estimated Net Value
(Original Value
Less Liens, Exemptions,
and Other Costs)
Sale/Funds
Received by
the Estate
Asset Fully
Administered (FA)/
Gross Value of
Remaining Assets
Case Number:
Page: 2
3:16-CV-285 GCM
Ref. #
Case Name: DCG RECEIVERSHIP 06/08/16
(530380)
currently listed for sale at $1,100,000.00 based on realtor's advice. (See Footnote)
Surplus Foreclosure Proceeds - McDowell County,
Surplus proceeds from tax foreclosure sale of property titled to H2O, LLC located in McDowell
County, NC.
FA196,225.56 196,225.567
Cash - Bank of North Carolina
Remaining balance in Bank of North Carolina account -0344 held by DCG PMF, LLC.
FA1.53 1.538
Cash - Bank of the Ozarks
Remaining cash held in account at Bank of the Ozarks for Huntersville Plaza Phase Two, LLC
FA22.00 22.009
Cash - Aquesta Bank - DCG Real Assets FA1,975.00 1,975.0010
Cash - Aquesta Bank - Finely Limited FA956.00 956.0011
Mining Equipment in Nevada
Certain mining equipment was left in three different locations in Nevada near the Willow Creek mine.
The Receiver learned the whereabouts of the equipment and filed suit to obtain an injunction as to
certain defendants who have been using the equipment.
UnknownUnknown 0.0012
Potential Arbitration Award
Potential recovery on Arbitration Award relative to the Willow Creek mine that was pending appeal as
of the date of the Receivership.
175,000.00175,000.00 0.0013
Turnover per Court Order
Asset reflects funds disgorged by DCG Commercial Holdings, LLC and DCG Commercial, LLC
pursuant to Order entered on 8/5/16, DE 50.
FA13,677.57 13,677.5714
Lot - 5330 Beacon Ridge, Granite Falls, NC
Caldwell County Parcel #08145549; value reflects appraised value; tax value is $52,000. Tilted to
Richard Davis Enterprises, LLC. Property is currently listed for sale at $18,000.00. (See Footnote)
20,000.0020,000.00 0.0015
Lien Rights - Vacant land, Huntersville, NC
Aegis/ DCG Asset Backed Fund (now DCG Commercial Fund I) held lien on a portion of
FAUnknown 28,992.4216
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 20 of 22
Opened / Filed:
Case Asset Report
01/09/18Period Ending:
Trustee: A. Cotten Wright
Asset Description
Estimated Net Value
(Original Value
Less Liens, Exemptions,
and Other Costs)
Sale/Funds
Received by
the Estate
Asset Fully
Administered (FA)/
Gross Value of
Remaining Assets
Case Number:
Page: 3
3:16-CV-285 GCM
Ref. #
Case Name: DCG RECEIVERSHIP 06/08/16
(530380)
Mecklenburg County Parcels #017-116-18 and #017-116-43. The Receiver foreclosed on that lien and
took title to the property. This property, along with property located at 102 Old Statesville Rd and 109
Gilead Rd, is subject to a Court approved pending sale to the Town of Huntersville.
Interest-9137 Mt. Holly-Huntersville Rd, Hunters
The origianl value shown reflected half of the appraised value of $195,000.00. The property was sold
on 11/28/17 for a gross sale price of $140,000.00. In addition, a defaulting buyer forfeited $1000 in
earnest money prior to the sale. The Receiver and the co-owners reached an agreement whereby the
receivership estate retained 45% of the sale proceeds, net of closing costs, taxes, realtor
commissions, and funds paid by the estate to maintain and repair the property, for a total of
$54,069.10.
FA97,500.00 141,000.0017
2014 Dodge Ram 2500 Truck
Taking into consideration the amount of the lien against this asset and the cost to liquidate it, the
Receiver determined that it had no value for the Receivership estate and moved to abandon it. An
Order allowing abandonment was entered on 1/5/2017.
FA2,334.27 0.0018
Personal property at 9137 Mt. Holly-Huntersville
The Receiver was authorized to abandon personal property located at 9137 Mount Holly-Huntersville
Rd by an Order entered on April 4, 2017.
FA0.00 0.0019
Easement across 11711 Alexandriana Rd
On April 18, 2017, the Court authorized the Receiver to grant an easement to Blue Green Capital
Partners I, LLC in exchange for $5,350.00 in compensation. The value of the easement was
determined by the appraisal of the real property. (See Footnote)
FA5,350.00 5,350.0020
Refund from Duke Energy - 9137 Mount Holly-Hunte
Partial refund of deposit for service at 9137 Mount Holly-Huntersville Rd.
FA20.92 20.9221
(Excluding unknown values) $3,285,362.85 $1,214,521.00 $2,291,000.0021 Assets Totals
RE PROP# 1 SCHEDULED / APPRAISED
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 21 of 22
Opened / Filed:
Case Asset Report
01/09/18Period Ending:
Trustee: A. Cotten Wright
Asset Description
Estimated Net Value
(Original Value
Less Liens, Exemptions,
and Other Costs)
Sale/Funds
Received by
the Estate
Asset Fully
Administered (FA)/
Gross Value of
Remaining Assets
Case Number:
Page: 4
3:16-CV-285 GCM
Ref. #
Case Name: DCG RECEIVERSHIP 06/08/16
(530380)
RE PROP# 6 SCHEDULED / APPRAISED
RE PROP# 15 SCHEDULED / APPRAISED
RE PROP# 20 SCHEDULED / APPRAISED
Case 3:16-cv-00285-GCM Document 165 Filed 01/09/18 Page 22 of 22