unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an ihop (internaonal h 2 o project)...

62
Unit 7 Atmospheric Waves and Topographically-Induced Flow Phenomena

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Unit 7 AtmosphericWavesand

Topographically-InducedFlowPhenomena

Page 2: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Reading Assignment

MR10Chap11:ThermallyForcedWindsinMountanousTerrain,pp.317-325Chap.12:MountainWavesandDownslopeWindstorms,pp.327-342Chap.13:BlockingoftheWindbyTerrain,pp.343-366

Page 3: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Atmospheric Waves Primer:

Ducted Gravity Waves, Solitary Waves, Density Currents, and Bores

Page 4: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

h = A cos (kx – ωt) Oscillation in space and time. A = Amplitude ω = ct c = phase speed k = 2π / λx

= horizontal wavenumber λx = horizontal wavelength

Wave kinematics

h = 10 cos (kx – ωt)

Page 5: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

h = 10 cos (ωt) At x=0, oscillation in time.

Wave kinematics

Page 6: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

h = 10 cos (kx) At t=0, oscillation in space.

Wave kinematics

Page 7: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  GravitywaveisawavedisturbanceinwhichbuoyancyactsastherestoringforceonparcelsdisplacedfromhydrostaNcequilibrium.

•  AlsoknownasbuoyancyoscillaNons.•  This buoyancy oscillation has a frequency related to stability,

known as the Brunt-Vaisala frequency (N)

Gravity Waves

Page 8: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Buoyancy - Driven by gravity through Archimedes’ Principle

Buoyancy

Page 9: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Buoyancy - Driven by gravity through Archimedes’ Principle

Buoyancy

Page 10: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Buoyancy - Driven by gravity through Archimedes’ Principle

Buoyancy

Page 11: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Buoyancy - Driven by gravity through Archimedes’ Principle

Buoyancy

Page 12: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Buoyancy - Driven by gravity through Archimedes’ Principle

Buoyancy

Page 13: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

• GravitywavegeneraNonmechanisms:•  Topography

•  Airflowovermountains•  Changesinsurfaceroughness

•  ConvecNon•  ConvecNvepenetraNonintostablelayersaloQ•  Densitycurrentsimpingingonstableboundarylayer.

•  Shearinstability–Kelvin-Helmholtzinstability•  GeostrophicAdjustment

Gravity Waves

Page 14: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Also known as Kelvin-Helmholtz instability

•  Occurs when Ri < 0.25

(RAM 2002)

2

2

⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎝

⎛=

dzduNRi

N g ddz

θ

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Shear instability

Page 15: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Shear Instability – KH Waves

(NOAA)

12/16/2011 - BHM

Page 16: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –
Page 17: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Shear instability

•  When stability is present above or below, internal gravity waves may radiate away from the shear layer

(Scinocca and Ford 2000)

Page 18: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

(CIMSS)

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Convection

Page 19: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Convection

(Bretherton and Smolarkiewicz 1989)

•  Contours of mixing ratio and potential temperature around simulated cumulus cloud

Page 20: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Convection

(Alexander 2002)

Page 21: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Topography

•  Flow over “two-dimensional” mountains

(NASA)

Page 22: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

ATS454/554Mesoscale 22

Exampleof“MountainWaves”•  PhototakenbyT.Lyzaduringthe

morninghoursof9June2012•  LocaNon:About20milessouthof

MilesCity,MT•  Viewingangle:towardtheNE•  RockyMountainsdistantbehind

picture

Page 23: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity wave generation mechanisms Shear instability

•  Geostrophic adjustment (unbalanced jet)

(Koch and O’Handley 1997)

Page 24: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Superposition of two internal gravity waves

•  One moving downward, one moving upward

•  Reflected above by layer with decreasing m2 (vertical wavenumber) and below by the ground

•  m2 (below), is taken from the Taylor-Goldstein Eqn, and is dependent on:

§  Stability determined by the Brunt-Vaisala freq (remember, these are buoyancy oscillations!)

§  Change in vertical shear – particularly due to curvature.

•  Thus, ducts can be created by 1) thermal inversions and 2) significant change/curvature in the vertical wind shear.

•  If duct depth is ¼ of a vertical wavelength of the internal gravity waves, the waves constructively interfere.

m Nc U

d Udzc U

k22

2

2

22=

−+

−−

( ) ( )

Page 25: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Superposition of two internal gravity waves

•  Here, vertical wavelength is 8 km, ¼ of vertical wavelength is 2 km – this is the duct.

Duct

Page 26: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Superposition of two internal gravity waves

•  Here, vertical wavelength is 8 km, ¼ of vertical wavelength is 2 km – this is the duct.

Duct

Page 27: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Flow in ducted gravity wave, u’ = A cos (kx – ωt) cos (mz)

•  u’ (and w’) sinusoidal in x and t

•  u’ maximized at surface, decreases with height

•  w’ maximized at top of duct, increases with height

Page 28: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  p’ and u’ correlated

•  Convergence and upward motion ahead of wave ridge

•  Divergence and downward motion ahead of wave trough

Page 29: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Positive perturbation shear (du’/dz) in wave trough

•  Negative perturbation shear (du’/dz) in wave ridge

Page 30: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves

(Koch and O’Handley 1997)

•  Thermal ducts

Page 31: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Ducted gravity waves •  Wind ducts (speed and direction)

Page 32: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

ATS454/554Mesoscale 32

The Role of Gravity Waves in IniEaEng and Intensifying an EF5-Producing Supercell: 25 May 2008, Parkersburg, IA

(FromNWSDesMoinesServiceAssessment,2008)

Page 33: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

ATS454/554Mesoscale 33

The Role of Gravity Waves in IniEaEng and Intensifying an EF5-Producing Supercell: 25 May 2008, Parkersburg, IA

(FromNWSDesMoinesServiceAssessment,2008)

Page 34: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

ATS454/554Mesoscale 34

The Role of Gravity Waves in IniEaEng and Intensifying an EF5-Producing Supercell: 25 May 2008, Parkersburg, IA

(FromNWSDesMoinesServiceAssessment,2008)

Page 35: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

The Role of Gravity Waves in IniEaEng and Intensifying an EF5-Producing Supercell: 25 May 2008, Parkersburg, IA

•  TheParkersburgtornadowasadevastaNngEF5tornadothatoccurredduringthelateaQernoonhoursof25May2008

•  FirstgravitywavemayhaveplayedaroleinCI,althoughexistenceofprefrontaltroughlowersconfidenceinhowmuchofaroleitplayed

•  SecondgravitywavecoincidedwithrapidintensificaNonofsupercellandmesocyclongenesis

• Wewillcoverthelinkbetweengravitywavesandmesocyclones,QLCSmesovorNces,andtornadoesinUnit6

ATS454/554Mesoscale 35

Page 36: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Layer of cooler, dense air overhead produces pressure rise, temperature drop and dewpoint rise at station as density current passes by.

•  Wind shift in direction of current motion

Density Currents

Page 37: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Often produced by cool thunderstorm downdrafts •  Typically have rear-to-front relative flow near surface •  Raised head near edge •  Vertical motion often produces condensation and lifts insects, dust. •  May produce CI

Density Currents

Seitter 1986

Page 38: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Density Currents

•  Often detected on radar due to condensation, insects, dust, etc.

Page 39: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

ATS454/554Mesoscale 39

Motion of a Density Current

•  Density current motion is tied to the depth of the cold pool and the negative buoyancy of the cold pool

•  The forward speed of a density current can be derived from forms of the hydrostatic equation and the x-equation of motion

•  Derivation time!

Page 40: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Flow suddenly changes from fast and shallow to slow and deep, maintaining constant flow rate.

•  Produces jump in height of flow

Hydraulic Jumps

Page 41: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  A bore is a moving hydraulic jump in the atmosphere •  Depth of stable BL suddenly increases, flow in direction

opposite of bore motion decreases •  A wave phenomenon •  Often produced when density current impinges on stable BL,

often at night.

Atmospheric bores

(Simpson 2007)

Page 42: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Since wave phenomenon, often move faster than density current that produced it.

•  When a bore passes, result is steady or increasing temperature (due to mixing of BL), drop in dewpoint (due to mixing), abrupt “permanent” rise in pressure.

Atmospheric bores

Page 43: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Atmospheric bores •  Initial pressure rise often followed by smaller oscillations in pressure •  Result in destabilization of atmosphere due to mixing of stable BL.

In combo with lift along leading edge of bore, may cause CI.

Page 44: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Atmospheric bores

Page 45: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Bore strength determines whether bore is smooth, undular, or turbulent (energy imbalance at bore must be dissipated by waves/turbc)

Atmospheric bores

Page 46: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  A single wave of elevation or depression in a stable layer of fluid (stable BL near surface)

•  A nonlinear form of wave between two fluids of different densities (similar to water waves)

•  Two types of dispersion occur •  Amplitude dispersion (larger waves move a little

faster, steepening wave crest) •  Wavelength dispersion (longer wavelengths move

faster)… similar process as shoaling of water waves

Solitary waves

Page 47: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  Cause temporary increase in pressure (as opposed to bores that cause more permanent increase in pressure), temporary warming and drying.

Solitary waves

Page 48: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Currents and Bores and Waves, Oh My!

•  Densitycurrents,bores,andsolitarywavescanbeplacedonasortofone-direcNonspectrumofevoluNon

•  Knupp(2006)detailstheevoluNonfromdensitycurrenttoboretosolitarywavesduringanIHOP(InternaNonalH2OProject)IOPon21June2002

ATS454/554Mesoscale 48

FromKnupp(2006)

Page 49: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Gravity Waves – Surface Trends •  DensityCurrent

•  Tempdecrease,pressureincrease,RHmayincrease.•  Bore

•  Tempsteadyorincrease•  sharppressureincrease(maybesemi-permanent)•  RHdecrease(mixing)

•  SolitaryWave–DuctedGravityWave•  Tempincreaseorsteady-Mixing•  TemporarypressureincreasewithU’windincrease•  PossibleRHdecreaseduetomixing

Page 50: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Overview

•  Topographycanimpactatmosphericflowsthroughavarietyofforcingsandscales

•  PVstretchinganditseffectsonRossbywaves(synopNcscale–DynamicsIandII)

•  ThermodynamicvariataNons(mesoscale)•  Slopeflows•  Valleyflows

•  Parceldisplacement(mesoscale)•  Mountainwaves•  Downslopewindstorms•  Terrainblocking

•  UniqueregionalclimatologicalfeaturesoQenassociatedwithtopography

•  DenverCyclone/DenverConvergenceVorNcityZone(DCVZ)•  CatalinaEddies

Page 51: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Slope Flow •  DrivenbybuoyancyvariaNonsalongamountainslope•  Atmosphereheatsfromthegroundupwardduringtheday,coolsfromthegroundupwardatnight

•  ChangeinelevaNonoflandsurface=horizontaltemperaturegradient•  BuoyancygradientduetohorizontaltemperaturegradientyieldshorizontalvorNcitygeneraNonandbothhydrostaNcandnonhydrostaNcp’(p’handp’nh)

•  Result:upslope(anabaNc)flowduringthedayanddownslope(katabaNc)flowatnight

•  AnabaNcflowp’•  Whentheslopeoftheterrainfeatureisgentle(small),p’hisdominant•  DepthofwarmsurfacelayertypicallyincreaseswithincreasingelevaNon,leadingtoanupslopePGF•  p’isconstrucNvetoupslopeflow

•  KatabaNcflowp’•  Whentheslopeoftheterrainfeatureisgentle(small),p’hisdominant•  CoolairnearsurfaceusuallybecomesdeeperwithincreasingelevaNon,leadingtoanupslopePGF•  p’isdestrucNvetodownslopeflow

•  ImplicaNon:anabaNc(upslope)windstypicallystrongerthankatabaNc(downslope)winds

•  Forsteepslope,p’nhoQendominates,leadingtop’overallacNngagainstbothanabaNcandkatabaNcflows

•  UpslopeflowtendstopeakafewhoursaQersunriseanddownslopeflowtendstopeakrightaroundsunset–peakdifferencebetweenmodifiedsurfacethermodynamicsalongslopesvs.valleytemperatures

•  AnabaNcflowstypically50-150mdeep,katabaNcflowstypically10-40mdeep

•  DepthofanabaNcflowincreaseswithincreasingelevaNon,whiledepthofkatabaNcflowincreaseswithdecreasingelevaNon

Fig.11.1fromMR10

Page 52: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

UpwardPGFAnabaNcWind

AdaptedFig.11.3fromMR10Depthofwarmersfcairincreases

Slope Flow •  Convergencezoneforms

nearzoneofpeaktemperaturegradient

•  DMCcanformwithinthisconvergencezone,orDMCthatformsattopofmountaincanintensify

•  CommonformaNonmechanismforlong-livedPlainsMCSs/MCCs

•  WithoutDMC,erodedinversionwillleadtomixingdownofflowaloQanddestroyslopeflow(e.g.westerlyflowovertheRockies)

•  DuraNonandstrengthofslopeflowinverselyproporNonaltostrengthofflowaloQinthedownslopingdirecNon(westerlyflowaloQfortheRockies)

Page 53: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Valley Flow •  DrivenbythermodynamicvariaNonsalongtheaxisofavalley

orbetweenavalleyandaplainlocatedattheendofavalley

•  Diurnalwindsflowup-valleyduetoairinsidethevalleywarmingmorethantheairabovetheplain,whilenocturnalwindsflowdown-valleyduetoairinsidethevalleycoolingmorethantheplain

•  Down-valleywindscanbeamplifiedbydownslopeflow,leadingaphenomenonknownasadrainageflow

•  Valleyflowcanbeexplainedbythefirstlawofthermodynamics

𝑄= 𝜌𝑐𝑝𝑉𝑑𝑇/𝑑𝑡 

•  Keyvariable->volume(V)•  AssumingequalheaNngovervalleyandplain,slopededgesof

valleydecreasethevolumeofairimpactedbysameheatflux•  GivenconstantQ,ρ,andcp,Nmerateofchangeoftemperature

mustchange•  Result:greatertemperaturevariaNonwithinvalleythanacross

plain

•  ThevalleydoesNOTneedtoslopeforvalleyflowtooccur!•  Amodifiedslopeflowup/downvalleycanoccurinslopedvalleys

andcontributetovalleyflow

•  TopographicamplificaNonfactor(TAF)canquanNfyhowamplifiedthediurnalcyclebecomeswithinavalley

𝑇𝐴𝐹= 𝐴𝑥𝑧𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑖𝑛/𝐴𝑥𝑧𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑦 

•  Magnitudeofvalleyflowcanreach5-10ms-1Fig.11.8and11.9fromMR10

Page 54: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Slope and Valley Flows – Combined Summary

Sunrise•  Down-valleywindpersists

•  Upslopeflowbegins•  Valleycolderthanplain

Mid-morning(0900LST)•  ValleyflowtransiNoning

fromdowntoup•  Strongupslopeflow

•  ValleysameTasplain

Noon/earlyaQ.•  Up-valleywindisstrong•  Upslopeflowbeginsto

weaken•  Valleywarmerthanplain

LateaQernoon•  Up-valleyflowconNnues

•  Noslopeflow•  Valleywarmerthanplain

Evening•  Up-valleywindweakening

•  Downslopeflowbegins•  Valleybarelywarmerthanplain

Earlynight•  ValleyflowtransiNoningfromuptodown

•  Downslopeflowpeaks•  ValleysameTasplain

Middleofthenight•  Down-valleywindmature

•  DownslopeflowconNnues

•  Valleycolderthanplain

Latenighttomorning•  Down-valleywindfillsvalley

•  Noslopeflow•  Valleycolderthanplain

Fig.11.10fromMR10

Page 55: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Mountain Waves •  Internalgravitywavesforcedbyflowapproximately

perpendiculartoaridgeorseriesofridges•  MR10discussesthecomplexdynamicsofthese

waves–wewillnot!•  Reviewandexpansionofinternalgravitywavesfrom

Unit3•  Cause:mechanicaldisplacementofaparcelthat

maintainsconstantbuoyancyintoalayerofdifferingbuoyancycharacterisNcs

•  Thus,buoyancyservesasthe“restoringforce”,i.e.theforcethataimsto“restore”theparcelbacktoastateofrest

•  Foraninfiniteseriesofsinusoidalridges:•  DerivaNonofw’forwavesoveraseriesofridges,the

wavecrestNltsupstreamforarealverNcalwavenumber(m)

•  Ifmisimaginary,thenwavesbecomeincreasinglyevanescentwithheight

•  Forasingularridge:•  Evanescenceforimaginarym•  Differentwavelengthsnowsupportedbythe

topography•  ImplicaNon->WemustapplyaFouriertransform(ugh!)

tofindthewavenumberssupported•  k2<<m2forhydrostaNcwaves->theseareconfinedto

nearthemountainridge•  Downstreamwaves,ifany,arenon-hydrostaNc•  Unlesstrapped,energywillbetransportedupward

duetok2<<m2forhydrostaNcwaves(andfornon-hydrostaNcwavesforotherreasons)

Wavesoveraseriesofridges

Fig.12.3fromMR10

misreal

misimaginary

Page 56: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Mountain Waves Wavesformedoverasingularridge

Fig.12.4fromMR10

LenNcularcloud–causedbyliQingofparcelsbyupward-propagaNonofmountainwaves

Fig.12.2fromMR10

Page 57: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  OfparNcularinterestaremountainwavesthatbecometrappedbyverNcalchangesinstabilityandshear

•  RecallfromUnit3:

𝑚2= 𝑁2/(𝑐−𝑢)2  − 𝜕2𝑢/𝜕𝑧2 /𝑐−𝑢  −𝑘2

𝑁2/(𝑐−𝑢)2  − 𝜕2𝑢/𝜕𝑧2 /𝑐−𝑢 =𝑙2 ->Scorerparameter

•  Becausek2<<m2formostmountainwaves,wavebehaviorisapproximatedwellbyanalyzingl2

•  SharpvariaNonsinstability(N2)andzonalwind(u)canleadtotwofluidlayersofdifferingScorerparameter,anupperlevel(lU)andalowerlevel(lL)

•  IflU<lL(ldecreasingwithheight),thenwaveswherelU<m<lLwillpropagateverNcallywithinthelayerwherel=lLbutwilldecayinthelayerwherel=lU(evanescentlayer)•  TheheightoftheinterfacebetweenlLandlUisdefinedasz=zr•  zrisaheightofperfectreflecNonofthewaveenergywithwavenumberm•  ReflecNonofwavesleadstoconstrucNveinterferenceamongwaveswithm=4zr(recallthatductdepth=¼verNcalwavelength,andzr=ductdepth)->thesewavesare“trapped”

Mountain Waves

Page 58: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Mountain Waves

Fig.12.1fromMR10

Visiblesatelliteimageryoftrappedmountainwaves

Fig.12.6fromMR10

Page 59: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Mountain Waves PicturebyT.LyzatakenSofMilesCity,MTonthemorningof9June2012,showingmountainwavecloudsoffoftheRockies

Fig.12.5fromMR10

LinearapproximaNon

Nonlinearapprox.–allowsforenhancementofwavesthroughnon-linearwaveinteracNons

Page 60: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Downslope Windstorms •  Intensewindstormsthatformonthedownslopesof

mountains

•  Associatedwithdeeplayersofairforcedoverterrain

•  Surfacelayeratthetopoftheterrainbarrierisusuallystronglystable

•  “CriNcallayer”presentabovestablesurfaceatcrest

•  NOTthermally-driven

•  Analogoustohydraulicjumps

•  CanbeexplainedbyusingaraNoknownastheFroudenumber

𝐹𝑟= 𝑢/𝑐 , where 𝑐= √𝑔𝐷 (shallow-waterwavespeed)

•  ForFr>1,flowissupercriNcaleverywhere(u>c)->flowslowsatopterrainpeakandacceleratesbacktooriginalvalueonthedownslope

•  ForFr<1,flowissubcriNcaleverywhere(u<c)->flowacceleratesoverpeakanddeceleratespastit

•  ForFr=1,flowisiniNallysubcriNcalbutacceleratestoasupercriNcalstate,peakingonthedownslopeoftheterrainfeatureunNlahydraulicjumprestoresflowtosubcriNcalstate

Fr>1

Fr<1

Fr=1

Fig.12.12fromMR10Fig.11.11fromMR10

Page 61: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

•  ThreemostcommoncondiNonsfordownslopewindstorms1.  BreakingofwavesinverNcally-

deepcross-mountainflow2.  BreakingofwavesatacriNcal

level(shallowcross-mountainflow)

3.  Strongly-stableairatmountainpeakwithlessstableairabove(l2interface)

• Wavesamplifyduetowavebreaking

•  “SeparaNonstreamline”important(seeFig.12.13)

Downslope Windstorms

Fig.12.13fromMR10

Page 62: Unit 7...from density current to bore to solitary waves during an IHOP (Internaonal H 2 O Project) IOP on 21 June 2002 ATS 454/554 Mesoscale 48 From Knupp (2006) Gravity Waves –

Downslope Windstorms Fixedinterface(3km) Fixedmountainheight(500m)

Fig.12.14fromMR10 Fig.12.15fromMR10